Thanks guys! You need to know, that a F1-car do not even "work" in such low speed like 0-62 miles/hour. It starts "working only way over 100 miles/hour. And after that, it is adios to any other racing car. There are actually videos where all these cars really are racing on the same track in the US. And the only "purpose" for that is/was how many times the F1-car would over take all the other cars in a given time/laps. And those other cars were given a significant head start according their theoretical lap speed. Well, it was quite clear what happened in a real track.
F3 is training for F2 which in turn is training for F1, having said that drivers need to be winners before F1 will consider them or be the son of an owner. Have a look at an F1 pit crew working during a race.
F1 is considered as the top or the peak of any 4-wheel racing discipline in the world. If I remember correctly there is only 1 driver who came from NASCAR and made it to F1, that was Mario Andretti in the '60s, there is another dude from CAN-AM who had experience in NASCAR who made it to F1, but only Andretti made it to NASCAR to F1 strictly in that order. On the other hand, there are more F1 drivers who transitioned to NASCAR, INDYCAR, or any other racing disciplines after retiring from F1, there are a lot of them. Well Juan Pablo Montoya is one F1 driver who comes to mind, that guy raced in almost every 4 wheel racing discipline out there.
Mario Andretti did not come from NASCAR, he came from IndyCar(or simply "USAC Championship Cars" as they were known at the time). He did dabble in NASCAR now and then(won the 1967 Daytona 500 - two years before he won Indy), but he never raced full time, and I think he only ever did two or three races a year. Montoya also raced in US open wheelers(during the split) before he went to F1. Won the 1999 CART championship and the 2000 Indy 500 before heading off to F1.
Also can you react to this please it’s how the new nascar next gen car works this is it’s first season and it has improved the racing at some tracks and has allowed for a closer field but some of its safety features are questionable mainly due to how the car bends or lack of bending when it crashes which will cause the driver to feel the crashes more which has sidelined Kurt Busch more than likely for the rest of the year
Romain Grosjean switched from F1 to Indy after his heavy crash in his last season with Alpha Romeo. If you haven't seen that incident, I'd recommend giving it a view. It isn't often these days in F1 where the car bursts into flames from a crash.
If you're interested in doing some IndyCar reactions, here's a good starting point: th-cam.com/video/mt7MQD0cmks/w-d-xo.html It's a VERY abridged history of IndyCar - any history lesson on IndyCar that takes less than about two hours to give will be heavily abridged simply due to the fact that IndyCar's history stretches over 100 years. Not an exaggeration - LITERALLY 100 years. Now, the person who made the videos is primarily a NASCAR fan, and he makes a couple of errors, but they're all very small things that are of little consequence to the overall history lesson and they still adequately highlight the matter, so it's still a good short-form starting point for learning about IndyCar, which may very well be the greatest motorsport in the world....that everyone forgot about.
Having F1 racing on an Indy oval would be intresting to se but before even comparing them in a fictional situation 1 thing must be made very clear. Indy cars are designed to be cheap relativly speaking and as far as i know once the car have been approved there are very few changes allowed to be made. This is not the case for F1 and becouse F1 cars are allowed to be redesigned and upgraded mid season aslong as they pass the crash tests it causes a big problem for our comparison. If u just place an F1 car into an Indy race without allowing the team to adapt it to work as best as possable on an oval then i would say that the Indy cars higher topspeed and the F1 cars more designed for tracks with alot of corners would be enough for Indy to beat the F1 car. However that is not how the F1 rules operate and to make that comparison fair the F1 teams must still be allowed to make changes to the car as if they were still racing in F1. Now some may say that would be unfair becouse F1 allow more changes then Indy but thats kinda the point here. To trully be able to test which racing series would be faster u cant restrict 1 series rules just becouse they allow more changes when racing against a series with more restricted rules. Now no F1 team would ever redesign a car for just a test like that so for an accurate test we have to assume that this would be part of the regular F1 race tracks so the teams actually have a valid reson to build a car made for an oval. With all this in mind the F1 car would obviously lose its big advantage in cornering speed for a faster car with so few corners on an oval and could focus mutch more into top speed. So with the down right outrages budget teams use on these cars i have no doubt that the F1 car would still end up as the faster car in the end. Indy would ofc also be allowed to adapt there car if they did race on an F1 track but becouse Indys rules wont allow for many chassi changes i cant se any possable way that they would ever beat F1 on an F1 race track.
Only seen a couple of your videos and have a few constructive criticism. Please pause the video if you are going speak are speaking over vital information which results in you having incorrect or incomplete conclusions. This is me commenting five months after the video was posted so hope you have taken this advised as suggested in the other F1 video I saw. Besides that love the content and you enthusiasm 😃.
F1 to nascar YES theres a few that did that towards the end of the career,nascar to f1 NO .F3/F2/F1 to indy YES ,indy to f1( Maybe) is hard and are somewhat similar but not since the urly 2000 has it got any results (the ones after the mid 2000's dear god worse drivers ever).best way to f1 is to start young with karts at 4/5 years old ,go into pro at 10 ,and by 16( or 15 forgot the exact age) to race in open wheel cars(f4 ,f3 ) and move towards f1 if you are good enough & have the money to push you there.
nascar to f1 doesent happen becuz f1 is a very much pay to play series and their drivers are way richer nascar drivers cant afford to race f1 but f1 drivers do occasionally race in nascar kimi raikkonen daniel kyvat just raced their first races in the past month but typically open wheel drivers like f1 or indycar arent successful transitioning to nascar juan pablo is the most successful and he had a mid career at best never came close to a championship or anything but nascar drivers have found success in indycar tony stewart is the main one that comes to mind and andretti was great in both open wheel and stock car
No offense... But just a little suggestion. If you are speaking during the video, you are missing out on important details explained in the video. Also, you may not know somethings, but commenting on every small thing is not needed. You can use that time to absorb the content and then discuss about it at the end. Better first listen to everything till you fully get used to the concepts of racing and once you are comfortable you can proceed with terminology, specifics, jargon of the racing world. Then it'll give you a chance to be in the same page as what is being discussed in the video, and contribute to the discussion and give your thoughts. But now, whatever you are trying to say during the video, it is 1. Distracting you from listening and fully comprehending the information (the general concepts) properly, 2. Come to wrong conclusions prematurely which doesn't help you to grow. Rather you can be patient and slowly learn stuff, rather than trying to grasp everything at once, but Paying attention to every single detail, so that it'll be in back of your mind and it'll connect instantly when you encounter it later. That way you'll learn about it properly in the long term. And in short term, in this video alone, after watching the video you could've come up with a proper discussion of better quality, if you've absorbed it better. Anyway it's great to see people attracted to motorsports, it is kinda overwhelming, but things become simpler when you understand the basics properly, without getting confused by the specifics, names, or rankings, etc etc.
Indy to f1 not that much,montoya was the last good driver and thats 20 years old now,since then all indy drivers have been poor,better get drivers from f2 than indy.
Which car do you think is the best all around race car?
Red bull
F1 RED BULL MAX VERSTAPPEN
Rally car
The difference between driving an F1 car and a Nascar stock car is like the difference between a Corvette and a dump truck.
Thanks guys! You need to know, that a F1-car do not even "work" in such low speed like 0-62 miles/hour. It starts "working only way over 100 miles/hour. And after that, it is adios to any other racing car. There are actually videos where all these cars really are racing on the same track in the US. And the only "purpose" for that is/was how many times the F1-car would over take all the other cars in a given time/laps. And those other cars were given a significant head start according their theoretical lap speed. Well, it was quite clear what happened in a real track.
I have seen ppl doing that test in racing games. However dident know its really been done.
F3 is training for F2 which in turn is training for F1, having said that drivers need to be winners before F1 will consider them or be the son of an owner. Have a look at an F1 pit crew working during a race.
Thanks for the info!! I know it has to be tough for drivers to win. We will check out the F1 pit crew soon.
F1 is considered as the top or the peak of any 4-wheel racing discipline in the world. If I remember correctly there is only 1 driver who came from NASCAR and made it to F1, that was Mario Andretti in the '60s, there is another dude from CAN-AM who had experience in NASCAR who made it to F1, but only Andretti made it to NASCAR to F1 strictly in that order. On the other hand, there are more F1 drivers who transitioned to NASCAR, INDYCAR, or any other racing disciplines after retiring from F1, there are a lot of them. Well Juan Pablo Montoya is one F1 driver who comes to mind, that guy raced in almost every 4 wheel racing discipline out there.
Mario Andretti did not come from NASCAR, he came from IndyCar(or simply "USAC Championship Cars" as they were known at the time). He did dabble in NASCAR now and then(won the 1967 Daytona 500 - two years before he won Indy), but he never raced full time, and I think he only ever did two or three races a year.
Montoya also raced in US open wheelers(during the split) before he went to F1. Won the 1999 CART championship and the 2000 Indy 500 before heading off to F1.
Thanks for the information!! We look forward to learning more about the sport.
@@FormulaFox Thanks for clarifying.
Also can you react to this please it’s how the new nascar next gen car works this is it’s first season and it has improved the racing at some tracks and has allowed for a closer field but some of its safety features are questionable mainly due to how the car bends or lack of bending when it crashes which will cause the driver to feel the crashes more which has sidelined Kurt Busch more than likely for the rest of the year
Romain Grosjean switched from F1 to Indy after his heavy crash in his last season with Alpha Romeo. If you haven't seen that incident, I'd recommend giving it a view. It isn't often these days in F1 where the car bursts into flames from a crash.
His crash wasn't with Alpha Romeo, it was with Haas.
@@janelc1843 Oh yeah, cheers for that one.
If you're interested in doing some IndyCar reactions, here's a good starting point: th-cam.com/video/mt7MQD0cmks/w-d-xo.html
It's a VERY abridged history of IndyCar - any history lesson on IndyCar that takes less than about two hours to give will be heavily abridged simply due to the fact that IndyCar's history stretches over 100 years. Not an exaggeration - LITERALLY 100 years.
Now, the person who made the videos is primarily a NASCAR fan, and he makes a couple of errors, but they're all very small things that are of little consequence to the overall history lesson and they still adequately highlight the matter, so it's still a good short-form starting point for learning about IndyCar, which may very well be the greatest motorsport in the world....that everyone forgot about.
Thanks for the recommendation we will start doing Indy reactions really soon!!
American Mario Andretti is the only driver ever to win the Indianapolis 500 (1969), Daytona 500 (1967) and the Formula One World Championship (1978).
for me the wildest thing is how unprotected the superbike drivers are compared to the rest
Having F1 racing on an Indy oval would be intresting to se but before even comparing them in a fictional situation 1 thing must be made very clear. Indy cars are designed to be cheap relativly speaking and as far as i know once the car have been approved there are very few changes allowed to be made. This is not the case for F1 and becouse F1 cars are allowed to be redesigned and upgraded mid season aslong as they pass the crash tests it causes a big problem for our comparison. If u just place an F1 car into an Indy race without allowing the team to adapt it to work as best as possable on an oval then i would say that the Indy cars higher topspeed and the F1 cars more designed for tracks with alot of corners would be enough for Indy to beat the F1 car. However that is not how the F1 rules operate and to make that comparison fair the F1 teams must still be allowed to make changes to the car as if they were still racing in F1. Now some may say that would be unfair becouse F1 allow more changes then Indy but thats kinda the point here. To trully be able to test which racing series would be faster u cant restrict 1 series rules just becouse they allow more changes when racing against a series with more restricted rules. Now no F1 team would ever redesign a car for just a test like that so for an accurate test we have to assume that this would be part of the regular F1 race tracks so the teams actually have a valid reson to build a car made for an oval. With all this in mind the F1 car would obviously lose its big advantage in cornering speed for a faster car with so few corners on an oval and could focus mutch more into top speed. So with the down right outrages budget teams use on these cars i have no doubt that the F1 car would still end up as the faster car in the end.
Indy would ofc also be allowed to adapt there car if they did race on an F1 track but becouse Indys rules wont allow for many chassi changes i cant se any possable way that they would ever beat F1 on an F1 race track.
Only seen a couple of your videos and have a few constructive criticism.
Please pause the video if you are going speak are speaking over vital information which results in you having incorrect or incomplete conclusions. This is me commenting five months after the video was posted so hope you have taken this advised as suggested in the other F1 video I saw.
Besides that love the content and you enthusiasm 😃.
F1 to nascar YES theres a few that did that towards the end of the career,nascar to f1 NO .F3/F2/F1 to indy YES ,indy to f1( Maybe) is hard and are somewhat similar but not since the urly 2000 has it got any results (the ones after the mid 2000's dear god worse drivers ever).best way to f1 is to start young with karts at 4/5 years old ,go into pro at 10 ,and by 16( or 15 forgot the exact age) to race in open wheel cars(f4 ,f3 ) and move towards f1 if you are good enough & have the money to push you there.
React to the biggest stories of f1 in 2021
th-cam.com/video/28qOeIFnA2Q/w-d-xo.html
Thanks for the recommendation we will add it to our watchlist!!
Indycar is awesome you guys should definitely check it out. I went to my first indy500 this year it was great.
nascar to f1 doesent happen becuz f1 is a very much pay to play series and their drivers are way richer nascar drivers cant afford to race f1 but f1 drivers do occasionally race in nascar kimi raikkonen daniel kyvat just raced their first races in the past month but typically open wheel drivers like f1 or indycar arent successful transitioning to nascar juan pablo is the most successful and he had a mid career at best never came close to a championship or anything but nascar drivers have found success in indycar tony stewart is the main one that comes to mind and andretti was great in both open wheel and stock car
All the racing types are super different disciplines. But get ready for a huge party at the nascar race.
Thanks for your comment. We are looking for to the Nascar race!!!
Nascar is so much better this year has been the most competitive nascar season in along time 10 races left and there have been 16 different winners
No offense... But just a little suggestion.
If you are speaking during the video, you are missing out on important details explained in the video. Also, you may not know somethings, but commenting on every small thing is not needed. You can use that time to absorb the content and then discuss about it at the end.
Better first listen to everything till you fully get used to the concepts of racing and once you are comfortable you can proceed with terminology, specifics, jargon of the racing world.
Then it'll give you a chance to be in the same page as what is being discussed in the video, and contribute to the discussion and give your thoughts.
But now, whatever you are trying to say during the video, it is
1. Distracting you from listening and fully comprehending the information (the general concepts) properly,
2. Come to wrong conclusions prematurely which doesn't help you to grow. Rather you can be patient and slowly learn stuff, rather than trying to grasp everything at once, but Paying attention to every single detail, so that it'll be in back of your mind and it'll connect instantly when you encounter it later. That way you'll learn about it properly in the long term.
And in short term, in this video alone, after watching the video you could've come up with a proper discussion of better quality, if you've absorbed it better.
Anyway it's great to see people attracted to motorsports, it is kinda overwhelming, but things become simpler when you understand the basics properly, without getting confused by the specifics, names, or rankings, etc etc.
F1 drivers go to indycar and Indy to f1 a lot
Indy to f1 not that much,montoya was the last good driver and thats 20 years old now,since then all indy drivers have been poor,better get drivers from f2 than indy.