Just what I am looking for. I and from Gold Rush City/town of Nome, Alaska. Many unexplained phenomenon going here. Esp now after the world is more in crisis. I shit you not, World. These events are truly horrifying and realistic. Only we that explore the after-time will know the meaning beyond our Otherworldy connections
RIP Mr. Grosse. You were an amazing person. Would have love to meet you and work with you. Alas, God called you to him. May God give you heaven. You helped so many people. Amen 🙏 🙏🙏🌹
Whilst going down my drive in my car I notice jogging along the road a woman with a phone to her ear.She needed to pass my neighbours hedge before I would be able to see her.I waited and she did not appear eventually I edged forward down the drive aware she must be there.I get to the pavement and she is not there completely disappeared ,she certainly did not pass in front of me and she did not retreat back up the road as I had a clear view back up the road when I was on the drive.Did I see a ghost ?? I have no other explanation.
I believe wholeheartedly in ghosts, but I also believe in Photoshop and basic photo trickery and know how to use both believably (Hell I put a new arm on a picture for a class and the teacher who stares at photoshop art all day couldn't tell until I showed him the four images separate). Just because I believe doesn't mean I won't guard myself from being tricked by bored people with basic technology and know how.
being in the photographic business 9years some of these are double exposures, ive seen so many of photos like these and they arent all photos of ghosts
Hi ok on the old film cameras you could take the photos and get them developed but if you used up the film and didn't get it developed and use the film again you'd get two lots of photos in one picture overlapping, it's easily done so it's called a double exposure and this is a fine example of one, nothing spooky here.
No legs at the end was creepy Maybe it has something to do with shutter speed. Allow fragments of what is light. Through the visible spectrum. That otherwise our eyes can not detect
The last one has been explained many years ago, by the "ghost" herself who was shocked to see that she's been pinned as a ghost. She was running at the time. One leg is behind the post, the other is behind her.
To be sure about what something is not, you need to know what it is first. And I don't think anyone is any closer nor do they even really know what a "Ghost" is?. Anythings possible. Even the impossible.
This is a Philip Schofield TV show, not exactly a powerhouse of scientific excellence just so you know. I think #1 is a double exposure (the woman in the table looks just like the real woman immediately to the right, like she moved her head when the shutter was closed - perfectly sensible explanation). Can't explain #2 and #3 but #4 has already been explained and is just a member of the public passing by. Maurice Grosse died in October 2006, in case anyone's curious.
I was looking at it too and the fact there is a piller there that can obscure her legs kills the notion of her being a ghost, she does look like she's running which would also explain why her legs are not visible, they're postioned in a different angle behind the piller.
I had a friend say a ghost did physically touch (scratch) him though. We didn't used to believe his story, until I saw something exactly as he described years later, only it didn't touch me. I pulled the covers over my head and it was gone when I looked again. I never believed in the paranormal until that experience. Now I know. It took me about a year to be able to sleep without a night light on after that.
one of my cats died a few days ago. i need a solid proof of ghosts just to know he is fine. i'm crying and begging god to send me a sign that my cat is fine.
Fwiw, I had an NDE at 19 and was greeted by my great-grandfather and an old family dog who both looked young again vs how they did before dying several years prior. The most powerful part of the experience for me - and the overriding trait of most NDEs - was the enormous love that I felt out of body. Paz y luz
And the legless lady? It's simply an odd angle and trick of camera as she was mid-step. Her other leg is obstructed by the black barrier thingy. These are almost comical.
tvargan, yours is the best explanation I've heard for why this woman's head is in the picture. The camera malfunctioned and only half-registered the waitress squatting down. Cameras can do weird things to images when they don't expose an image properly. As for the others, they were pretty laughable, although the legless lady almost had me for a bit.
You put up some great videos. I really enjoyed this and put it in the favorites. One of the pics reminds me of one of mine in Columbia Station Haunted House Part 1. I have an image of a blurred face like the pic they showed here at the table.
I don't know about the electric chair one being debunked but there's a very simple explanation which could explain it, if I turn out to be correct. The poster wasn't inside the tunnel, it was inside the train car itself. It's not unreasonable to suggest the camera flash lighting up the train car and catching the poster's reflection. The poster would obviously be on the train line which stops near Madame Tussaud's because it's a local attraction.
I find it rather interesting how in the first example shown the woman to the right of the supposed apparition has moved over to her right by as much as a foot from where she was in the first photo. You can determine this by noticing her head in relation to the vertical trim on the wall behind her head from one pic to the next. Had she not done so she would have been covered by the 'apparition'. Everyone else in the photos appear to be in relatively the same position in each photo...curious!
Yeah, I just don't get people sometimes. I'm a passionate person and get a bit over-zealous about things, I guess, but some things really get to me. It's stupid to be gullible and believe everything, but it's even stupider to not believe or believe in anything.
For the last picture I heard a very good explanation. The woman had one foot on the ground behind that pole which isn't visible from that angle, and her other leg is up in the air behind her body because she is running. Seems logical enough. The other pictures are very convincing, however.
The photo with the woman's mom and step-dad is scary...I remeber seeign these in a magazine at the same time as the programme and Maurice Grosse commented in the magazine as well, saying again that there is no explation for the images. The one with the extra person at the table is very freaky...So it is true about the one with the "legless" woman - she wasn't really a ghost and she was just running at the time?
LOL, thanks for letting me know, the reply was a tad confusing, b/c it does sound like a new comment rather than a reply to me. ;) Thanks again, and take care!
just saw the first one and if you see the beer glass that is losest to the guy who took the photo is realy near the one to the left.. and at the second photo its in the same spot but the glass that was next to it wasnt and changed places...
photo number 3 is a double exposure and i have no doubt about it. Having been developing photographs for 9 years processing peoples holiday photos etc ive seen plenty of theses.
I'm sorry but the first 1 is a double exposure. The glasses don't necessarily rule it out. Same thing with the parents behind the stage. I mean it's almost undeniably a double exposure. C'mon. Also, guess what, ppl lie 😂
Love a ghost story, but these all have simple explanations: Photo #1. it's the lady with the black hair who was leaning forward and has leaned back whilst the non-flash slower exposure shot is being taken #2. poster in the tube put up by unofficial persons (possibly artist) #3. Double exposure from an old film (I've done this loads of times by accident) 4. This one has been proven a mistake, the lady is alive and annoyed at all the attention she got from people thinking she was dead
When the lady with the black hair leaned forward, did she grow and change the color of her shirt from black to white? And then there's TWO of her, with two different shirts??
First of all, God Bless Mr. Grosse's soul. I'm sorry to hear that he's no longer with us. Question: Since Maurice Grosse pretty much dedicated his life to studying the paranormal, then how come he's not trying to communicate with us now that he's dead? Just a thought . . .
the woman with no legs was explained years ago. She is leaning into her next step...both her legs are out of shot. Poor woman is quite alive and has been plagued by this photo!
oh i understand what ur sayin. but these ppl dont fake the photo. the photo with the 2 couple floating at the concert was acually an overlaping with other photos. its hard for me to explain.
In the opening frame of this video I was looking at what I now realize is a letter "Q" to the mans right expecting to see a ghost pop up or something inside of it 😂
Regarding the famous Austrian photo - interesting how the two ladies sitting either side of the so called apparition are conveniently sitting further apart to let her in ... 🤔
@Lyndam98 Well the sun isn't shinning, but wouldn't her legs cast some kind of shadow? If she had them, plus she doesn't look right some how. Isn't she a little to close to the woman & child?
@63tennesseeflower This isn't only my opinion, several sites on the net say the same thing. One leg is behind the post, the other is raised up and is under her coat as she takes the next step. Trust me on this. The photo, while not a fake, is a mistake. Of course it's just an opinion. I choose to believe it is unfortunate timing.
@47tooter That's probably the case. But seems to me if both legs are behind the pillar, she's gonna fall right on he face! Because there's nothing supporting her.
Caleb, I had to laugh at your comment, only because I feel the same way when I read the shit other people write. I'm the guy who comments about people who just nit pick the shit out of every video. Keep up the good work bro.
To me it just looks like bad photo development. Maybe some other pictures taken on the camera somehow fused with those pictures, causing it to look like there's extra people.
it could be fake...but that is creep having some strange person or someone u know who has been dead for years suddenly appear on your picture like that O_o
...and over the years I've witnessed cats, dogs and birds following something invisible in the air in my home. I have also experienced "ghost cats" jumping on my bed. Proof? No proof, sorry.
The one of the old coiple is fake, its called something like photo overlap. The photo was edited and the entertainers have been put over the others, there is another method of this that was discovered by a victorian photographist, easier anyhow.
@aimeerenee2 i love the way how some people commenting on the video think they have an explanation after watching the video on youtube. as the video states proffessionals have examined the photos and omg if only they coud read the comments they would have all the questions answered and feel like idiots for not realising themselves. these photos are credible for a reason. as if all the people at a dinner would suddenly decide to fake a ghost photo. look at them ffs.
Maurice Grosse was certainly a brilliant paranormal investigator. But most famous for his role in The Enfield Haunting
RIP Maurice Grosse
Those are the most extraordinary pictures I've ever seen. This could prove once and for all that spirits exist!
Just what I am looking for. I and from Gold Rush City/town of Nome, Alaska. Many unexplained phenomenon going here. Esp now after the world is more in crisis. I shit you not, World. These events are truly horrifying and realistic. Only we that explore the after-time will know the meaning beyond our Otherworldy connections
😂😂😂
RIP Mr. Grosse. You were an amazing person. Would have love to meet you and work with you. Alas, God called you to him. May God give you heaven. You helped so many people. Amen 🙏 🙏🙏🌹
R.i.P mate
RiP mate. true legend
Whilst going down my drive in my car I notice jogging along the road a woman with a phone to her ear.She needed to pass my neighbours hedge before I would be able to see her.I waited and she did not appear eventually I edged forward down the drive aware she must be there.I get to the pavement and she is not there completely disappeared ,she certainly did not pass in front of me and she did not retreat back up the road as I had a clear view back up the road when I was on the drive.Did I see a ghost ?? I have no other explanation.
0:57 notice how the image of the apparition distorts behind the glass bottle, how do you fake that?
Well noticed.
I believe wholeheartedly in ghosts, but I also believe in Photoshop and basic photo trickery and know how to use both believably (Hell I put a new arm on a picture for a class and the teacher who stares at photoshop art all day couldn't tell until I showed him the four images separate). Just because I believe doesn't mean I won't guard myself from being tricked by bored people with basic technology and know how.
Id like a rational explanation for Schofield still working as a presenter?
He's just come out as a gay boy after 26 years being married to a woman with whom he had children. Bastard ruined their lives.
There isn’t one apart from perhaps he needs the cash?
Ah, Nick. Being a Karen.
being in the photographic business 9years some of these are double exposures, ive seen so many of photos like these and they arent all photos of ghosts
What is a double exposure
Hi ok on the old film cameras you could take the photos and get them developed but if you used up the film and didn't get it developed and use the film again you'd get two lots of photos in one picture overlapping, it's easily done so it's called a double exposure and this is a fine example of one, nothing spooky here.
@@samsam-tu7im I understand BUT those are not good examples of double exposure, this is trying to explain away what you won't accept....
@@samsam-tu7im where can we find examples of double exposure look these ???I've been looking and can't find any.
@@homerdadon6363
Google has plenty of examples.
coolest mustache ever
No legs at the end was creepy
Maybe it has something to do with shutter speed. Allow fragments of what is light. Through the visible spectrum. That otherwise our eyes can not detect
Great Video
These are all 100% real. Why the hell are people so closed-minded and skeptical?
The last one has been explained many years ago, by the "ghost" herself who was shocked to see that she's been pinned as a ghost. She was running at the time. One leg is behind the post, the other is behind her.
Lol yeah right, if she was running why was her arms not in motion, why wasn't she looking where she was running ???
Bs! Its a ghost! U cant see WiFi but u KNOW its all around u! Explain that then?!! Bloody debunkers go n debunk a monotheistic religion! 😂
To be sure about what something is not, you need to know what it is first. And I don't think anyone is any closer nor do they even really know what a "Ghost" is?. Anythings possible. Even the impossible.
A mate of mine once saw a ghost.
This is a Philip Schofield TV show, not exactly a powerhouse of scientific excellence just so you know.
I think #1 is a double exposure (the woman in the table looks just like the real woman immediately to the right, like she moved her head when the shutter was closed - perfectly sensible explanation).
Can't explain #2 and #3 but #4 has already been explained and is just a member of the public passing by.
Maurice Grosse died in October 2006, in case anyone's curious.
I was looking at it too and the fact there is a piller there that can obscure her legs kills the notion of her being a ghost, she does look like she's running which would also explain why her legs are not visible, they're postioned in a different angle behind the piller.
I had a friend say a ghost did physically touch (scratch) him though. We didn't used to believe his story, until I saw something exactly as he described years later, only it didn't touch me. I pulled the covers over my head and it was gone when I looked again. I never believed in the paranormal until that experience. Now I know.
It took me about a year to be able to sleep without a night light on after that.
one of my cats died a few days ago. i need a solid proof of ghosts just to know he is fine. i'm crying and begging god to send me a sign that my cat is fine.
Fwiw, I had an NDE at 19 and was greeted by my great-grandfather and an old family dog who both looked young again vs how they did before dying several years prior.
The most powerful part of the experience for me - and the overriding trait of most NDEs - was the enormous love that I felt out of body.
Paz y luz
And the legless lady? It's simply an odd angle and trick of camera as she was mid-step. Her other leg is obstructed by the black barrier thingy. These are almost comical.
tvargan, yours is the best explanation I've heard for why this woman's head is in the picture. The camera malfunctioned and only half-registered the waitress squatting down. Cameras can do weird things to images when they don't expose an image properly.
As for the others, they were pretty laughable, although the legless lady almost had me for a bit.
@Kalorifer133 don't think photoshop existed during the 90's
2:50 to be fair she could have just not shown him the real photograph
@ShaneThompson94 Is Halifax far Manchester? I'm visiting a friend in Manchester soon and I want to go to Shibden Hall.
Holy crap, that last photo was VERY scary...might need to watch an episode of TWD or AHS to palette cleanse my brain before bed!!
ACK!
It kinda looks like a cloaked / hooded shadow person taking form.
You put up some great videos. I really enjoyed this and put it in the favorites. One of the pics reminds me of one of mine in Columbia Station Haunted House Part 1. I have an image of a blurred face like the pic they showed here at the table.
I don't know about the electric chair one being debunked but there's a very simple explanation which could explain it, if I turn out to be correct. The poster wasn't inside the tunnel, it was inside the train car itself. It's not unreasonable to suggest the camera flash lighting up the train car and catching the poster's reflection.
The poster would obviously be on the train line which stops near Madame Tussaud's because it's a local attraction.
Cool, I remember these from when I was a kid.
Lov it, Gonna be the best halloween of y life
holy mother, im getting chills
1:05 I just want some beer!!!
1:09 "she's 15 percent too large, and slightly out of focus", marvelous words stated from a (so-called) paranormal investigator
I find it rather interesting how in the first example shown the woman to the right of the supposed apparition has moved over to her right by as much as a foot from where she was in the first photo. You can determine this by noticing her head in relation to the vertical trim on the wall behind her head from one pic to the next. Had she not done so she would have been covered by the 'apparition'. Everyone else in the photos appear to be in relatively the same position in each photo...curious!
this is creepy. it gave me chills. don't know what to believe though.
Quite fancy Maurice!!!
Yeah, I just don't get people sometimes. I'm a passionate person and get a bit over-zealous about things, I guess, but some things really get to me. It's stupid to be gullible and believe everything, but it's even stupider to not believe or believe in anything.
For the last picture I heard a very good explanation. The woman had one foot on the ground behind that pole which isn't visible from that angle, and her other leg is up in the air behind her body because she is running. Seems logical enough. The other pictures are very convincing, however.
The photo with the woman's mom and step-dad is scary...I remeber seeign these in a magazine at the same time as the programme and Maurice Grosse commented in the magazine as well, saying again that there is no explation for the images. The one with the extra person at the table is very freaky...So it is true about the one with the "legless" woman - she wasn't really a ghost and she was just running at the time?
LOL, thanks for letting me know, the reply was a tad confusing, b/c it does sound like a new comment rather than a reply to me. ;) Thanks again, and take care!
Could the photo of the mother and father in the background been caused by taking a new photograph over the existing film? Similar to a video tape???
That's what they meant by 'double exposure'.
just saw the first one and if you see the beer glass that is losest to the guy who took the photo is realy near the one to the left.. and at the second photo its in the same spot but the glass that was next to it wasnt and changed places...
photo number 3 is a double exposure and i have no doubt about it. Having been developing photographs for 9 years processing peoples holiday photos etc ive seen plenty of theses.
@coluna09 I dont think you can explain me how they used photoshop before it was out
Double exposure, I agree" I myself have photos/cameras that have done this 'its kinda neat...
I'm sorry but the first 1 is a double exposure. The glasses don't necessarily rule it out. Same thing with the parents behind the stage. I mean it's almost undeniably a double exposure. C'mon. Also, guess what, ppl lie 😂
Here here...could not agree with you more! Good comment lucasaccardo!
I thnk it is when the camera spool get's stuck and it's 2 pics on top of each other
what exactly is a double exposure?
Love a ghost story, but these all have simple explanations: Photo #1. it's the lady with the black hair who was leaning forward and has leaned back whilst the non-flash slower exposure shot is being taken #2. poster in the tube put up by unofficial persons (possibly artist) #3. Double exposure from an old film (I've done this loads of times by accident) 4. This one has been proven a mistake, the lady is alive and annoyed at all the attention she got from people thinking she was dead
Double exposure was a common glitch with film but should be non existent with digital cameras
When the lady with the black hair leaned forward, did she grow and change the color of her shirt from black to white? And then there's TWO of her, with two different shirts??
@watchensee She was in the middle of walking briskly so she was leaning forward slightly.
First of all, God Bless Mr. Grosse's soul. I'm sorry to hear that he's no longer with us.
Question:
Since Maurice Grosse pretty much dedicated his life to studying the paranormal, then how come he's not trying to communicate with us now that he's dead?
Just a thought . . .
Just because you have not heard from him, doesn't mean he's remaining out of contact.
😂
were never alone spirits are always watching out over us or driving us crazy..lol
This video is real... I know this because i am the grandson of the narrator.
I don't think anyone doubts the authenticity of the video, mate.
the woman with no legs was explained years ago. She is leaning into her next step...both her legs are out of shot. Poor woman is quite alive and has been plagued by this photo!
How silly. Of course, she hasn't been 'plagued'. 😂
now i want to watch ghost stuff!
3:26 there were part apparitions in the Enfield poltergeist case.
oh i understand what ur sayin. but these ppl dont fake the photo. the photo with the 2 couple floating at the concert was acually an overlaping with other photos. its hard for me to explain.
@Decoder099 How cool to have Maurice Grosse for a grandfather...he's the daddy !!
In the opening frame of this video I was looking at what I now realize is a letter "Q" to the mans right expecting to see a ghost pop up or something inside of it 😂
0:18 is that Buzz Killington? :D
Why r they not double exposures then
ths is in the 90s
did they have photoshop then
those are real.. believe it or not.. its up to you guys..
second pic @ 1:29 looks cool! whether it's real or not
Photoshop?
Regarding the famous Austrian photo - interesting how the two ladies sitting either side of the so called apparition are conveniently sitting further apart to let her in ... 🤔
@Lyndam98 Well the sun isn't shinning, but wouldn't her legs cast some kind of shadow? If she had them, plus she doesn't look right some how. Isn't she a little to close to the woman & child?
where does one find a ghost expert?.
Interesting, yet creepy! I guess that woman that showed up in that photo, was probably a deceased relative.
LOL Colonel Mustard!
@63tennesseeflower This isn't only my opinion, several sites on the net say the same thing. One leg is behind the post, the other is raised up and is under her coat as she takes the next step. Trust me on this. The photo, while not a fake, is a mistake. Of course it's just an opinion. I choose to believe it is unfortunate timing.
Do not curse at me! I do care if they're fake or not, frankly. They're entertaining.
Photoshop and programs like it have been around since the mid 80s.
The third photo is totally ridiculous! So fake! Lol
jesus thats scary as fuck that.schofield with dark hair.sends shivers down my spine that.
OW MAH GAAAAAAAAAAWD
@47tooter That's probably the case. But seems to me if both legs are behind the pillar, she's gonna fall right on he face! Because there's nothing supporting her.
Caleb, I had to laugh at your comment, only because I feel the same way when I read the shit other people write. I'm the guy who comments about people who just nit pick the shit out of every video. Keep up the good work bro.
Limited vocabulary, too.
3:04 When I going to youtube in 2007 I see this
Photo 1. Photoshop
2. Mannaquin in the chair or double exposure or photoshop. Take your pick.
3. Double exposure.
I don´t get the second one , but the third one is obviously a double exposure, lol
Philip scholfield is harry potter!!!
Maurice grosse i wander were he was buried id like to pay my respects ❤❤
To me it just looks like bad photo development. Maybe some other pictures taken on the camera somehow fused with those pictures, causing it to look like there's extra people.
People these pics are OLD. They didnt have photoshop as good as we do now.
it could be fake...but that is creep having some strange person or someone u know who has been dead for years suddenly appear on your picture like that O_o
...and over the years I've witnessed cats, dogs and birds following something invisible in the air in my home. I have also experienced "ghost cats" jumping on my bed. Proof? No proof, sorry.
The one of the old coiple is fake, its called something like photo overlap. The photo was edited and the entertainers have been put over the others, there is another method of this that was discovered by a victorian photographist, easier anyhow.
@aimeerenee2 i love the way how some people commenting on the video think they have an explanation after watching the video on youtube. as the video states proffessionals have examined the photos and omg if only they coud read the comments they would have all the questions answered and feel like idiots for not realising themselves. these photos are credible for a reason. as if all the people at a dinner would suddenly decide to fake a ghost photo. look at them ffs.
Really that's your thing to scar people
When did Harry Potter become a host of a TV show???
If you can't stand peoples' ability to doubt something they are told on TV, maybe you shouldn't be on the internet.
Well she must have for walking around without legs like that... That's the mark of the dark art: Loss of limbs, and yet you still use them.
@Decoder099 real ?please for people who dont know photoshop
0:52 ghost photobomb