@@mikehh8020 Especially arrogant given a bunch of people who wouldn't even know what end the bullet exits the barrel pretend they are schooling someone obviously familiar with guns. I see the same arrogance when anti-gunners tell me an AR can't be used for hunting because it'd "blow up" the animal and there wouldn't be any meat left to eat.
As a handicapped individual with nerve damage I would expect a full apology from Mr Cicilline. He's either made a decision to be wrong or he's ignorant of the facts . Either way these people are making decisions that effect the lives of the impaired . It's dangerous not to use the brace if needed .
I never went to the ER and professed to know what the docs know just because I saw ER on TV yet these Congress critters are shameless and lacking self awareness.
This is so damn dumb it's funny as hell. I totally didn't notice it until you pointed it out, but I'm still laughing about it. Good eye sir, good eye. 🤣🤣
Eventually they will realize how wrong and clueless they are. Oops.. McBath or Cicilline have likely never held a firearm. Tom Massie, my Congressman BTW, is obviously very knowledgeable. He owns multiple NFA MGs.
It’s depressing how people are so happily anchored in their insistence to remain aesthetically willfully ignorant about things they want to do in order to hurt fellow citizens in order to get their way in violation national law. This guy deserves all the shade that gets thrown his way
The first minute I heard this video, I could tell the guy had no idea what a stabilizing arm brace is. Literally a brace attached to the pistol that you put your arm through to hold it when shooting. You can't put your hand through a bump stock.
the technique of bump fireing is harnessing the inherent instability of the weapon. a bump stock is a device to make that easier (its really just a cheat for people that cant do it themselves). a brace when used properly STABILIZES the weapon making such a technique impossible. tldr you have people that know dick making laws.
@@jonyoung4793 I know. I was doing the exact same thing at the TV. I boils my blood to see that level of ignorance. I hope the democrat communist are happy with the stupid people that they elect.
It’s even worse if they understand the mechanics and are using disinformation. They should be required to take a lie detector prior and post of the debate to determine if they lied. Any lie gets them booted and the bill in the trash can.
I started giggling when he said it was a "bump stock"... it's an arm brace. I know people that have limited grip due to being partially paralyzed use it to maintain control of a weapon. What a loser
I never thought our Politicians could be so uninformed about and not have true knowledge of what they are voting on ! They just want total control of our lives because their the boss.
When attempting to strip the United States of The Constitution, you should not be paid U.S. tax dollars, let alone be allowed to vote upon demonstrating such flagrant ignorance and bias on a topic.
This is actually making me sick to my stomach that people who can't get a job working at McDonald's based on their intelligence are able to get a job as a politician.
It's amazing how all of these representatives are in active violation of the second amendment and the Constitution as a whole. No consequences whatsoever.
This reminds me of Scott Weiner standing up at a press conference claiming assault rifles can fire incindiary rounds that are heat seaking and follow their targets. Or Sheila Jackson Lee claiming an AR15 fires a .50 caliber round and weighs as much as 10 heavy boxes. Can't make this up.
Well, depends on what they mean by .50 cal. If she’s talking about .50 Beowulf, then it can. That requires swapping the upper and the buffer tube. If however, she’s talking about .50 BMG, then no, it can’t.
As someone who owns a stabilizing brace. It's a substitute for a stock for arps. The brace does not do anything for bumpfiring a rifle. It's a fixed position. If anything it made the weapon more useless as when used as directed. U can't line up sights without holding the rifle 1 handed way infront of you. And makes handling it more difficult "unless ur handicapped which I could see it helping"
Someone has misheard the word "Buttstock" and thinks every weapon stock is now accelerating the fire rate of any firearm. This is like letting bicyclists make laws about airplanes. They have no clue what is going on and how things work.
And a "bump stock" is not needed for a semi automatic rifle to fire as fast as the mechanism can fire..... These people have no idea what they are talking about....
Ignorance of things you don’t really care about is understandable, but when representing literally millions of other people and their interests. It is a complete and total dereliction of your duties to not gain a cursory understanding of the topics at hand. This goes for more than just gun rights but seems even more lacking in matters related to firearms.
where and what part of the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED does NO ONE understand? There should be no debate on anything of this nature. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
If they are this willfully ignorant on this, it means they are likely as ignorant on everything else, doubly so on anything they disagree with. And they are writing our laws.
@@quixote1965 WOW... that was a jump in logic and a dumbass assumption. I'd try and answer your question, but it's clear from you opening statement you have NO interest in actually hearing what I have to say.
No one should be so sure of themselves when they are so obviously wrong about something. It only serves to cast doubt on the validity of everything they say, no matter the subject. His confidence in the accuracy of his claim when it is so blatantly ridiculous only points out his stupidity. Ignorance can be overcome. Stupid is forever.
This would be comical if it weren’t so absolutely ridiculous. I kept waiting on Rep. Massie to explain that it was not physically possible for a stabilizing brace to do what Cicilline claimed it would do. Not that Cicilline would let facts educate him.
Could've just explained that the stabilizing brace locks into place on the buffer tube, preventing it from moving in a manner in which a bump stock might.
People complaining that these people don’t know anything about guns yet are making laws are missing the point. The point is that these people can care less about what they know and don’t know. It will never happen that they will be magically enlightened because all they care about is power. So if they have to make up some BS to get it, they will do so.
These people are so ignorant it makes me sick . I don’t know who “educated” them on things for this bill but that person need fired and so do the people that vote for a obviously unconstitutional bill but that’s besides the point.
The way he described it... The brace allows you to stabilize the weapon and fire it more rapidly. Well yes sir that is true, if you hold an AR style weapon properly with a stock you can in fact fire more quickly. A bump stock requires you to hold your weapon improperly. Using a bump stock you must apply forward pressure to facilitate the firing of multiple rounds in rapid succession. This way of rapidly firing any form of auto loading rifle can be achieved using your belt loop(on your pants). Do you propose a ban on pants with belt loops? I yield my time.
The stock literally locks into place! The stock can't freely move over the buffer tube unless you release the locking mechanism to shorten or lengthen the stock. It's never ben free flowing and can't be fre flowing when the gun is fired.
Just go to a range. shoot the weapons your trying to ban. understand the attachments function. There is no way I would ever in my lifetime follow a law when it was written out of ignorance.
the dems obviously have no clue that since the gun has some recoil the buffer tube and the spring act as a way to absorb some of the recoil to make sure you dont hit something your not when shooting
I was like, "it has a buffer tube while being a stabilizing brace." is like saying, "this peanut brittle is peanut butter, why can't you see that?" lmao so much stupid
So are we just gonna ignore the fact that the lady said that they “accessorize a weapon as an assault weapon” that literally means she wants to ban it because it makes it look scary….
I lost any faith I had left in the American public schools when I saw a Video of Rep. Hank Johnson, a Georgia Democrat, In a congressional hearing ask if adding a few thousand people to Guam would make the island "become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize." . True story, the vid is still out there.
@@robinstewart6510 It stabilizes it by having 2 points of contact on you. For what purpose? To make it less dangerous for the shooter. To shoot repeatedly, you pull the trigger again, if you wanna shoot fastee, you pull the trigger faster. No need to modify the furniture of the stock to "shoot repeatedly"
It's an embarrassment that our representatives put forward, vote on, and ultimately enact legislation on topics which they have no functional understanding. As frustrating as these few minutes are for anyone with basic mechanical knowledge, or even just the ability to imagine how mechanical assemblies work... This particular example is just the tip of the iceberg, the rest of the iceberg rides in thousand pages omnibus bills which 'have to be passed so we can know what's in it.' Most of these people, beyond the procedural aspect of how Washington operates, are beyond ignorant in every aspect of what they do, and how it affects us all.
I doubt that it will make any difference when the Dems learn what a pistol brace is/does. They are bound and determined to ban, ban, ban, never mind small details like "your reason for banning isn't valid". Remember, Dems are the party that wants to ban guns for having a collapsible stock (so my wife can shorten the stock to fit her arm length), a bayonet lug, or a barrel shroud.
Hold up, do you honestly believe that they could both be that stupid AND just happen to always be wrong in a way that abuses stupid voters but helps their careers? These people have literal teams dedicated to doing research and making presentations, this kind of "ignorance" is simply not possible unless its willing
@@headwrinkle9896 I DO believe they are that stupid. And the teams of researchers are most likely a bunch of wokester/betas who learn all they know about guns from Hollywood and the dinosaur media (who in tern learns all THEY know from politicians).
@@headwrinkle9896 You assume their teams of people are likewise any better than completely ignorant. What's her name, you know the one who felt it necessary to interject with her own special flavor of ignorance, claimed to have extensive experience with 'experts' of some kind. She may well believe she does have experts. Most likely what we see is a little out of column A and a little out of column B.
I never heard of Massie. He looks like a fatter Rand Paul. Is he also from KY? What do they put in the water over there? I mean that state consistently produces legitimate politicians, so it would seem.
Anyone in government that goes against the Constitution in any way shape or form is committing an act of treason and should be held accountable by law.
@@godswill2260 yes happy too. The constitution while not forbidding gun ownership does not include a right for personal gun ownership and therefore gun regulations are not "against the constitution"
People making laws about things they know absolutely nothing about...
They think they know what they’re talking about, which is worse.
They think they are our betters.
@@kevinbarbour2771 The tail continues to shake the dog.
@@mikehh8020 Especially arrogant given a bunch of people who wouldn't even know what end the bullet exits the barrel pretend they are schooling someone obviously familiar with guns. I see the same arrogance when anti-gunners tell me an AR can't be used for hunting because it'd "blow up" the animal and there wouldn't be any meat left to eat.
Unfortunately that happens all the time.
Homie really tried to sit here and say “if it has a stock on it, then it is always a bump stock!” 😂😂😂😂
OMG🤦♂️ These guys know nothing.
Welcome to government bureaucrats bunch of overpaid professional useless people.
They have no clue what they are talking about!
As a handicapped individual with nerve damage I would expect a full apology from Mr Cicilline. He's either made a decision to be wrong or he's ignorant of the facts . Either way these people are making decisions that effect the lives of the impaired . It's dangerous not to use the brace if needed .
i positively adore how confidently wrong he is. refreshing truly.
I never went to the ER and professed to know what the docs know just because I saw ER on TV yet these Congress critters are shameless and lacking self awareness.
Good for you Mr. Massie
Terrifying that these people are making our laws on things they know nothing about.
I found it hilarious that the picture he used for his brace argument has a vertical grip installed on an ar-15 pistol. Someone call ATF. Lol
This is so damn dumb it's funny as hell. I totally didn't notice it until you pointed it out, but I'm still laughing about it. Good eye sir, good eye. 🤣🤣
They were totally going for the most criminal looking weapon they could put together.
If more than 26” long it can have a vertical grip
That is the perfect example behind "not to be infringe "
Eventually they will realize how wrong and clueless they are. Oops.. McBath or Cicilline have likely never held a firearm. Tom Massie, my Congressman BTW, is obviously very knowledgeable. He owns multiple NFA MGs.
They're Dems even when they learn the truth, they will never admit they were wrong.
*Eventually they will realize how wrong and clueless they are.*
Nope. And that's assuming they don't know that what they are saying is already wrong.
It’s depressing how people are so happily anchored in their insistence to remain aesthetically willfully ignorant about things they want to do in order to hurt fellow citizens in order to get their way in violation national law. This guy deserves all the shade that gets thrown his way
The first minute I heard this video, I could tell the guy had no idea what a stabilizing arm brace is. Literally a brace attached to the pistol that you put your arm through to hold it when shooting. You can't put your hand through a bump stock.
After he indicated that adding a stabilizing brace will increase the rate of fire, I started yelling at my phone.
the technique of bump fireing is harnessing the inherent instability of the weapon. a bump stock is a device to make that easier (its really just a cheat for people that cant do it themselves). a brace when used properly STABILIZES the weapon making such a technique impossible. tldr you have people that know dick making laws.
@@jonyoung4793 I know. I was doing the exact same thing at the TV. I boils my blood to see that level of ignorance. I hope the democrat communist are happy with the stupid people that they elect.
The sad thing is that this brace by design ends the effect a bump stock needs to function lol.
@@jonyoung4793 I was pissed! I got ripped off. My brace didn't increase my rate of fire at all!
Wow. This entire administration is beyond clueless, in everything
Never before have I seen legislation put forward by people who have NO IDEA what they’re talking about!
You must not have been watching politics for very long
@@Spyder_King he’s being sarcastic
It’s even worse if they understand the mechanics and are using disinformation. They should be required to take a lie detector prior and post of the debate to determine if they lied. Any lie gets them booted and the bill in the trash can.
That's all they've ever done.
And remember, this is 'common sense' legislation!
It makes me Ill every time they refer to it as an assault rifle
And listen to her she even called it a hand brace so she recognizes it's a hand brace and keeps trying to lie and say it's a bump stock
This is just RIDICULOUS! No wonder we have stupid laws and things take forever to get thru congress!
Since when could ordinary citizens get "Automatic Weapons"???? 😂😂😂
“The stabilizing brace, when combined with the buffer tube turns it into a bump stock…”
These people are absolute CLOWNS! My mind is blown…
They are full of it
I started giggling when he said it was a "bump stock"... it's an arm brace. I know people that have limited grip due to being partially paralyzed use it to maintain control of a weapon. What a loser
I never thought our Politicians could be so uninformed about and not have true knowledge of what they are voting on ! They just want total control of our lives because their the boss.
When attempting to strip the United States of The Constitution, you should not be paid U.S. tax dollars, let alone be allowed to vote upon demonstrating such flagrant ignorance and bias on a topic.
who says it is US money they are taking?
Blatantly anti-Constitutional legislation is the real insurrection, not that clownshow that happened on January 6th.
We the people are rejecting all gun laws. How do you like them apples
Become ungovernable
Bump stock!?! These people are badly misinformed. Smh
This is actually making me sick to my stomach that people who can't get a job working at McDonald's based on their intelligence are able to get a job as a politician.
We have the right to automatic weapons. That's it. Arguments like this have always been to blind people to that.
It's amazing how all of these representatives are in active violation of the second amendment and the Constitution as a whole.
No consequences whatsoever.
Isnt there some precedent that one sue because if intentional misinformation?
This reminds me of Scott Weiner standing up at a press conference claiming assault rifles can fire incindiary rounds that are heat seaking and follow their targets. Or Sheila Jackson Lee claiming an AR15 fires a .50 caliber round and weighs as much as 10 heavy boxes. Can't make this up.
Well, depends on what they mean by .50 cal. If she’s talking about .50 Beowulf, then it can. That requires swapping the upper and the buffer tube. If however, she’s talking about .50 BMG, then no, it can’t.
I doubt she could tell the difference.
I thought I was watching a SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE comedy skit.
@@Exl6243 Still wouldnt be heat seeking or incendiary.
How can that many oxygen thieves be in one room.
I'm done 💀💀💀💀💀
As someone who owns a stabilizing brace. It's a substitute for a stock for arps. The brace does not do anything for bumpfiring a rifle. It's a fixed position. If anything it made the weapon more useless as when used as directed. U can't line up sights without holding the rifle 1 handed way infront of you. And makes handling it more difficult "unless ur handicapped which I could see it helping"
Their level of ignorance is truly shocking....Cicilline is a fool, and an ignorant fool too... But he doesn't want to know the truth.
Someone has misheard the word "Buttstock" and thinks every weapon stock is now accelerating the fire rate of any firearm.
This is like letting bicyclists make laws about airplanes. They have no clue what is going on and how things work.
And a "bump stock" is not needed for a semi automatic rifle to fire as fast as the mechanism can fire..... These people have no idea what they are talking about....
Could anyone imagine this guy trying to change there windshield wipers lol
David Cicilline's ignorance is appalling.
Ignorance of things you don’t really care about is understandable, but when representing literally millions of other people and their interests. It is a complete and total dereliction of your duties to not gain a cursory understanding of the topics at hand. This goes for more than just gun rights but seems even more lacking in matters related to firearms.
These are no gentlemen you are yielding to good sir
how are they gonna make an arm brace illegal when you can make your own out of duct tape? or literally just your belt.
These are not weapons of war. They are defensive weapons. Just like we don't have a war department, but department of defense.
Strange.
Almost like this is exactly why the 2nd amendment exists....
where and what part of the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED does NO ONE understand? There should be no debate on anything of this nature. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
I guess they’ll want to Ban Jerry Miculek’s finger next !
I guess they haven’t heard of belt loops and index fingers…😂
The funny part is all they are trying do is ban a single piece of strap
Omg! Just OMG, can we take an hour and go to the range to demonstrate, this is not a bump stock. We are screwed if these are the clowns making law.
If they are this willfully ignorant on this, it means they are likely as ignorant on everything else, doubly so on anything they disagree with. And they are writing our laws.
@@quixote1965 WOW... that was a jump in logic and a dumbass assumption. I'd try and answer your question, but it's clear from you opening statement you have NO interest in actually hearing what I have to say.
You can’t fix stupid. But you can vote it out!
Sharp as marbles.....
No one should be so sure of themselves when they are so obviously wrong about something. It only serves to cast doubt on the validity of everything they say, no matter the subject. His confidence in the accuracy of his claim when it is so blatantly ridiculous only points out his stupidity. Ignorance can be overcome. Stupid is forever.
The first time I saw the rapid fire "bumpstock" effect, the shooter used a rubber band. Good lord, these anti-gunners are ignorant as hell.
Unreal. They have no clue. How can you attempt to make laws on ANY subject matter with no intimate knowledge of the subject at hand?
This would be comical if it weren’t so absolutely ridiculous.
I kept waiting on Rep. Massie to explain that it was not physically possible for a stabilizing brace to do what Cicilline claimed it would do.
Not that Cicilline would let facts educate him.
I removed my brace so since it's removed now I own a bump stock
The Overton window on the Democrats on this panel is perfect.
Could've just explained that the stabilizing brace locks into place on the buffer tube, preventing it from moving in a manner in which a bump stock might.
And theses people make the laws
That firearm in the picture is illegal, because that is an aow . You need a 5$ tax stamp to have that.
That's so funny their ignorance 🤣
People complaining that these people don’t know anything about guns yet are making laws are missing the point. The point is that these people can care less about what they know and don’t know. It will never happen that they will be magically enlightened because all they care about is power. So if they have to make up some BS to get it, they will do so.
Massi is exactly right
" I never said it was a bump stock! "
Proceeds to claim its a bump stock like dude cmon
I wonder who are these "experts" are that Ms McBath asked, because they not are.
They do know most braces are fixed position right?
America amazes me each time i watch a vid or news. Politicians claiming they know how something works but being oblivious they are in the wrong xD
Cicilline - “ pride of Rhode Island” 😡😡
My head exploded
"its acting as a bump stock because its replacing the butt of the gun." so a buffer tube is a bump stock aswell? you lost me.
These people are so ignorant it makes me sick . I don’t know who “educated” them on things for this bill but that person need fired and so do the people that vote for a obviously unconstitutional bill but that’s besides the point.
I only want to go to engineering school to learn how to make air guns as powerful as firearms so I don't have to deal with stupid laws
The way he described it... The brace allows you to stabilize the weapon and fire it more rapidly. Well yes sir that is true, if you hold an AR style weapon properly with a stock you can in fact fire more quickly.
A bump stock requires you to hold your weapon improperly. Using a bump stock you must apply forward pressure to facilitate the firing of multiple rounds in rapid succession.
This way of rapidly firing any form of auto loading rifle can be achieved using your belt loop(on your pants).
Do you propose a ban on pants with belt loops?
I yield my time.
I wrapped my M98 Mauser sling around the stock, and I could not fire like an MG42 Hmmmmm
If you have no real knowledge of the subject matter ,you should not be able to pass laws on subjects you have NO KNOWLEDGE OF....
A pistol brace is not a bumpstock what a liar
The stock literally locks into place! The stock can't freely move over the buffer tube unless you release the locking mechanism to shorten or lengthen the stock. It's never ben free flowing and can't be fre flowing when the gun is fired.
Bump stocks.
Do we actually believe this guy doesn’t know what the brace does or that it can’t function as a bump stock?
Wow... talk about people wanting to ban things that they have no idea how things work.
Can Mr Cicilline use a brace as a bump stock?
This is painful. Cicciline acting like the Patrick meme
Just go to a range. shoot the weapons your trying to ban. understand the attachments function. There is no way I would ever in my lifetime follow a law when it was written out of ignorance.
We need to start our government over again peacefully. These people should not be in power.
"because it replaces a stock, makes it a bumpstock" God. These people are MAKING LAWS for us. They are actually making laws.
Help us.
Pray the Senate saves us again.
Do NOT comply
Oh, come on. It's not just a replacement stock. Not even the manufacturer claims that. Read their advertising.
I’m not sure they realize that you don’t need a stock to bump fire a weapon
@@poseidenforceccj2528 lmao wait till they find that out
"I'm not saying it's a bumpstock, I'm saying it makes it perform like a bumpstock because it has a buffer tube"
I think my brain just broke.
It's clear that Cicilline's brain is broke.
No. Military experience or gun knowledge for that dumb ass!!!!!
Same
the dems obviously have no clue that since the gun has some recoil the buffer tube and the spring act as a way to absorb some of the recoil to make sure you dont hit something your not when shooting
I was like, "it has a buffer tube while being a stabilizing brace." is like saying, "this peanut brittle is peanut butter, why can't you see that?" lmao so much stupid
David Cicilline: "What type of bump stock is this?"
"Sir, this is a tortoise"
"I like turtles"
😂
“Can i get a- uuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh baconater?”
Is this a cat in a hat?
Very nice. 🤣🤣🤣
This is type of sheer stupidity that we are up against. Willful ignorance.
Only one cure for that
Not just that. I think they are LYING to push a narrative. We all know this. They want to dis-arm the populous to better control us.
Guarantee they know better they are just going after everything they can
So are we just gonna ignore the fact that the lady said that they “accessorize a weapon as an assault weapon” that literally means she wants to ban it because it makes it look scary….
Imagine arguing as a representative that a STABILIZING feature facilitates movement.
Haha, brilliant. Cicilline doesn't understand inertia. Newton be damned. We all saw the proof. LOL.
I lost any faith I had left in the American public schools when I saw a Video of Rep. Hank Johnson, a Georgia Democrat, In a congressional hearing ask if adding a few thousand people to Guam would make the island "become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize." . True story, the vid is still out there.
What a great way to put it!
Run for Congress. Please. America needs everyday simple people saying things this simply.
@@robinstewart6510
It stabilizes it by having 2 points of contact on you. For what purpose? To make it less dangerous for the shooter.
To shoot repeatedly, you pull the trigger again, if you wanna shoot fastee, you pull the trigger faster. No need to modify the furniture of the stock to "shoot repeatedly"
It's an embarrassment that our representatives put forward, vote on, and ultimately enact legislation on topics which they have no functional understanding. As frustrating as these few minutes are for anyone with basic mechanical knowledge, or even just the ability to imagine how mechanical assemblies work... This particular example is just the tip of the iceberg, the rest of the iceberg rides in thousand pages omnibus bills which 'have to be passed so we can know what's in it.' Most of these people, beyond the procedural aspect of how Washington operates, are beyond ignorant in every aspect of what they do, and how it affects us all.
As horrible as this sounds you are absolutely correct on this.
I doubt that it will make any difference when the Dems learn what a pistol brace is/does. They are bound and determined to ban, ban, ban, never mind small details like "your reason for banning isn't valid". Remember, Dems are the party that wants to ban guns for having a collapsible stock (so my wife can shorten the stock to fit her arm length), a bayonet lug, or a barrel shroud.
Hold up, do you honestly believe that they could both be that stupid AND just happen to always be wrong in a way that abuses stupid voters but helps their careers? These people have literal teams dedicated to doing research and making presentations, this kind of "ignorance" is simply not possible unless its willing
@@headwrinkle9896 I DO believe they are that stupid. And the teams of researchers are most likely a bunch of wokester/betas who learn all they know about guns from Hollywood and the dinosaur media (who in tern learns all THEY know from politicians).
@@headwrinkle9896 You assume their teams of people are likewise any better than completely ignorant. What's her name, you know the one who felt it necessary to interject with her own special flavor of ignorance, claimed to have extensive experience with 'experts' of some kind. She may well believe she does have experts.
Most likely what we see is a little out of column A and a little out of column B.
This is what happens when an Engineer, Thomas Massie, tries to explain how things work to lawyers.
To those who "get it", no explanation is required:
To those who "don't get it", no explanation is possibly sufficient.
Most Attorneys are attorneys because there is literally no math or engineering requirements. BTW, these are the basics of deductive reasoning.
I never heard of Massie. He looks like a fatter Rand Paul. Is he also from KY? What do they put in the water over there? I mean that state consistently produces legitimate politicians, so it would seem.
@@yakamen his district is in Northern Kentucky. Near Cincinnati.
And lawyers who are Democrats to boot.
It's like having a 14 years old kid with no knowledge about meteorology, giving speeches about climate change....wait..
"HOW DARE YOU"!!
@@Mike-gt1cs LOL!!!!!!!! 😂😂😂
*Greta Toonberg has entered the chat*
@@Mike-gt1cs
Dawn bro..you pulled that reverse card on me...?..lol..nice one..
Wait, Whats this?
It’s hard to have a conversation with people who are willfully ignorant.
You mean, Democrats and liberals, sadly.
Every stinking one of them.
There are none so blind as those that will not see; none so deaf as those that will not hear...
They arent ignorant, they are liars, big difference.
This is not ignorance, but dishonesty
Your mistake is thinking this is caused by stupidity and not malice.
7:18 - "Because you're gonna be famous.."
He isn't *wrong*
Anyone in government that goes against the Constitution in any way shape or form is committing an act of treason and should be held accountable by law.
if only you understood the constitution
Those thst make the law will never be accountable by the laws they create. Hence American Revolution
Agree wit that
@@benadam7084 Please do explain
@@godswill2260 yes happy too. The constitution while not forbidding gun ownership does not include a right for personal gun ownership and therefore gun regulations are not "against the constitution"
And they double-downed on their stupidity.... God, that was hard to watch.