LA County Gives Free Eviction Lawyers To Tenants Who Didn't Pay Rent

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
  • The Los Angeles County, California board of supervisors voted to provide taxpayer funded eviction lawyers to Tenants facing eviction. The grand majority of Tenants facing eviction are for not paying rent.
    laist.com/news...

ความคิดเห็น • 114

  • @hermitbob7304
    @hermitbob7304 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    What better way to spend taxpayer money. Probably spend $80k in lawyers fees per tenant, rather than just pay the past due rent and maybe a year in advance.

  • @justjen12345
    @justjen12345 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    It sure makes you want to take matters into your own hands. Taxpayers money shouldn't go to this ridiculous law. The landlords pay taxes too. Sick

    • @guitaristxcore
      @guitaristxcore หลายเดือนก่อน

      I hope you take matters into your own hands with the wrong person.

  • @TL-wy1nk
    @TL-wy1nk หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    They are not preventing homelessness. If you don't pay rent , just get out. You are not entitled to anything.

    • @elpanchosancho2
      @elpanchosancho2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah. Quit jacking up the price. People deserve to keep the financial slumlords houses

    • @bassman5123
      @bassman5123 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@elpanchosancho2 There already is rent control on most housing in CA, especially in LA county. And the price? Are you kidding me? These freeloaders aren't paying one penny. That's the point! And they want the taxpayers to pay 5 million per month for this crap.

  • @willismartin9196
    @willismartin9196 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    California Dreaming, is now the California Nightmare 😢

  • @cdrone4066
    @cdrone4066 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    They do this in NYC, L&T is a shit show in NYC.

  • @ctjk1982
    @ctjk1982 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    And then people are complaining that landlords are not doing repairs now. The state better not complain when the landlord stops paying any and all property taxes and bills. What's the state going to do. Take the building. The state has no money.

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      Eminent domain!!!

  • @julietewing4847
    @julietewing4847 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    State funded, county funded, or government funded?
    I thought it had been reported/stated that California was broke?

    • @bassman5123
      @bassman5123 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It is broke. But the morons who run the state just keep doubling (or more) down anyway!

  • @user-tw3kr9if1f
    @user-tw3kr9if1f หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    As a Life-long L.A County resident its obvious why the quality of life and the County is going down the crapper tax payer revenues going to deadbeat renters.

  • @andymalanga
    @andymalanga หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    No wonder the rent is so high in. Los Angeles!

  • @lucyhallinan
    @lucyhallinan หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I have a renter who paid $0.00. I saw 3 Xmas go by. He's.... They're finally out.Feb, I enter my ct papers for a Dec date(10 mo) judge cancel to April(14 mo) 1 month waiting ... 3 no for sherriff papers. I went to ct to find my sherriff papers lost. I had to redo sherriff papers. 21 mo... Def quit his job. The Justice system message to LL holding legal rental contracts bet adults .... Cts and renters are BULLIES. Cts favor renters. This gv my def FREE rental Free ESQ FREE job time and FREE escape time it's why LL are quitting

    • @Jon.......
      @Jon....... หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      too many abbreviations

  • @WinWinRealtorsTV
    @WinWinRealtorsTV หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You are spot on, Chief. It’s sad.

  • @OldsmobileCutlassSupremeConver
    @OldsmobileCutlassSupremeConver หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    San Diego does it too.
    It's all about the Attorney/Advocate Eviction cash cow, cottage industry.
    The Rental business is a Sucker's Bet now.

  • @apllu17
    @apllu17 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    L.A county assumes that landlords are too rich for the same support.

  • @charlesphilhower1452
    @charlesphilhower1452 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Legal aid has always provided free lawyers, it is just that they would not waste time and money on clear cut cases where the tenant failed to pay rent.

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      In LA that's about the only way to get rid of a tenant! And it take many months and can cost thousands!

  • @sidwhiting665
    @sidwhiting665 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Free? Hah, not free. "Taxpayer funded" is the correct term. I know that's not you saying "free", Tony. But sadly it's how people will think of it.
    Anyway, it will just make landlords far less likely to take marginal tenants. Anyone who might not pay (bad credit, bad LL references, low income) will be rejected, because no landlord will want to pay to fight the inevitable non-payers. This will increase the homeless population, the precise opposite of the intended effects.
    CA landlords are gluttons for punishment. I would never invest there. Banks should stop lending there, due to the increased risks of non-payment.

    • @rosesmith6208
      @rosesmith6208 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      do you think they are doing this on purpose because they do understand consequences of violating rights and justice, so that private landlords will dissappear and corporations can come in buy it up cheap and get laws rescinded that protect tenants? you know problem reaction solution (or problem bad effects solution?

    • @georgewagner7787
      @georgewagner7787 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@rosesmith6208 I think they're too stupid to understand unintended consequences

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rosesmith6208 I want to sell to a huge corporation just for this reason!

  • @Lee-yc1if
    @Lee-yc1if หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Look up sang Kim in Bellevue Washington he has been evicted four times. The city of Seattle paid his $86,000 in back rent so he can live in a 2 million house rent-free along with his legal fees. While the landlord has to pay all the legal fees of his on his own

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      How much would it cost to put him in jail for a year or so?

    • @Lee-yc1if
      @Lee-yc1if หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iccsmmc I googled it and it said between 40 and 60 Grand. And the landlord wouldn't have to go to court factoring in costs and lawyer fees is probably over 100,000 this guy's cost to State

  • @sp-cn8pm
    @sp-cn8pm หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm so curious to see how it pans out in the next 5 years.

  • @skyelizkhalil3950
    @skyelizkhalil3950 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This already happens in Westchester county in New York. All tenants are given free counsel and translators.

  • @user-gb8sc2fy8t
    @user-gb8sc2fy8t หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tax money we all pay for it

  • @kcgunesq
    @kcgunesq หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is great news. For attorneys. Since most rental agreements make tenants responsible for costs of evictions, having an attorney that will at best, prolong the hearing or process will just mean that the landlord's attorney will just make more. Also, the tenant attorneys will get a regular source of income. I hope this idea rolls out nationwide as it could be a great source of income for those in the legal profession.
    Of course, it will just drive up the cost of renting for everyone else, including those on fixed budges that pay on time. But that's a small price to pay for ensuring attorneys make more.

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      As well as the huge costs of a jury trial demanded by the "tenant's" free attorney.

  • @stevengoldstein114
    @stevengoldstein114 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is amazing is that the only reports you see in the news regarding the markets are those with financial conflicts of interest. Meaning you are getting what the private sector pays to present, not the real data. Which is why many landlords get surprised when things do not go the way they were promised.

  • @terrysmith1774
    @terrysmith1774 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Are the landlords going to be made to do repairs? Los Angeles has soooo many buildings that are in need of repairs. But I hope that they put a time restraint on how long these lawyers can drag out these cases. There are soooo many laws in California already that “protect tenant rights,! Let’s STOP all these “Non Effective” so called remedies, a make Landlord repair their properties and make tenants pay their rent!!!
    It doesn’t take a Rocket scientist to see that there is a feasible resolve to this problem!
    Smh

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      In Los Angeles, the tenants love to complain to LAHD ( Los Angeles Housing Authority), and the LADBS (Los Angeles Department of Building and safety) about any repair usually caused by the tenant's ignorance or outright vandalism!

  • @miscprojects9662
    @miscprojects9662 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What is it going to take. Does there have to be a class action lawsuit to end over taxation so that there is no money for these insane programs. Crazy that there is no money to repair sidewalks and streets or remove graffiti but there is money to give to dead beats who breech their rental contracts. Enough is enough.

    • @stevengoldstein114
      @stevengoldstein114 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What grounds is there a case? There is nothing unconstitutional, the lawyers enforce public policies. Under the constitution, the tenants are required to have due process and the lawyers are assurance of it.

    • @georgewagner7787
      @georgewagner7787 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No taxation without representation

    • @stevengoldstein114
      @stevengoldstein114 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@georgewagner7787You are represented, the legislators were elected.

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      AAGLA, AOA USA, Howard Jarvis Group, are litigating all the time on behalf of the honest hard working landlords but it takes big bucks to go against the politicians who can use our tax money against us!!!!

    • @stevengoldstein114
      @stevengoldstein114 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iccsmmc again due process is required, and if an attorney is necessary to assure due process, so be it. You are not being denied due process.

  • @dnandez79
    @dnandez79 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sue the county for misappropriation of tax payer funds. Its bullshit that they take homeowners taxes and then use those taxes to screw the owner.

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      AAGLA, AOA USA, Howard Jarvis group are litigating all the time but it takes big bucks to go against the politicians who, like you say, use our tax money against us!!!

  • @fremontusc
    @fremontusc หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In the city of Los Angeles, they do provide lawyers for low income landlords. I wonder if the LA County system does the same?

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow can you provide the contact information for "free" legal. My lawyer charges $890. per Unlawful Detainer!!!!

    • @fremontusc
      @fremontusc หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iccsmmc Los Angeles County is the program that provides for low income, property owners filing eviction

  • @bassman5123
    @bassman5123 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    When is Holly Mitchell going to start allowing the homeless to stay in her house (or even her yard)?

  • @maryanngullo1
    @maryanngullo1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What they dont mention is how many of the city council are renters. Yah just take a look.

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably only the new ones. Afterall, why do most aspiring autocrats want to hold political office!

  • @vintageradio58
    @vintageradio58 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    FREE lawyers for tenants has been in place for the last 30 + years.

    • @cdrone4066
      @cdrone4066 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There is legal aid but they don’t take many cases.

    • @bassman5123
      @bassman5123 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Not on this scale, silly. This is a whole new ball game!

  • @bassman5123
    @bassman5123 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How many of these freeloaders even pay income tax that will help pay for this? I suspect very few!

  • @ddrhazy
    @ddrhazy หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is a sound in your video. Maybe your microphone is right next to an HVAC register blowing air?

  • @ilikestuff7598
    @ilikestuff7598 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nani Nani boo boo.

  • @user-ip2bw8hf2q
    @user-ip2bw8hf2q หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lol just another way for them to pit landlords against tenants. Another distraction from the horrible shit they do daily

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      How else would career autocrats keep getting elected by their tenant base?!?!?

  • @georgewagner7787
    @georgewagner7787 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wear a different tshirt on that sofa.

  • @stevengoldstein114
    @stevengoldstein114 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the kind of news most landlords work to avoid spreading, here is one instance however $1.5B San Francisco loan heads to servicing; Maximus Real Estate Partners owns Parkmerced, a 3,221-unit housing complex in San Francisco." Published April 30, 2024
    The 152-acre, 3,200-unit multifamily complex known as Parkmerced was recently appraised at $1.4 billion, about $400 million less than the amount owed and down $700 million from 2019, the servicer said.
    That kind of loss forces lenders to shut the loans down
    Maximus Defaults on $1.8B Loan for Parkmerced in San Francisco
    Maximus Real Estate Partners defaults on a $1.8B in loans for Parkmerced, San Francisco’s largest apartment community.

  • @guitaristxcore
    @guitaristxcore หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love that LA County is doing this. Great work. Fuck the landlords.

    • @doom4067
      @doom4067 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, how dare they provide housing to people...

    • @iccsmmc
      @iccsmmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a competition between LA City and LA County who can chase small honest, dedicated family housing providers away from California the fastest, leaving the huge Wall Street Syndicates who really don't give a damn about tenants!!!!!!!

  • @stevengoldstein114
    @stevengoldstein114 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is a rerun. You talked about it more than 4 times

    • @pissedoffshitzu601
      @pissedoffshitzu601 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tony could be on vacation.

    • @YoPhocFays
      @YoPhocFays หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      He's back. 😂

    • @sidwhiting665
      @sidwhiting665 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@YoPhocFays Tenant Wars II: Goldstein Strikes Back!
      A long time ago, in a rental market far, far away....

    • @YoPhocFays
      @YoPhocFays หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @sidwhiting665
      Part 3: "The Return of the Squatter"

    • @mapleaf6672
      @mapleaf6672 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@YoPhocFays @sidwhiting665 "The Thing That Wouldn't Leave"

  • @stevengoldstein114
    @stevengoldstein114 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4 days ago it was approved. So it is a done deal.

    • @johnniebeavers4003
      @johnniebeavers4003 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Landlords can still get out of being lanclords. I know if this law comes to where I live I will not let anybody live in my rentals.

    • @stevengoldstein114
      @stevengoldstein114 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnniebeavers4003 Your choice. But you still need to operate your business, right?

    • @johnniebeavers4003
      @johnniebeavers4003 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@stevengoldstein114 Yes it would be my choice. Why would I want to house people for free? I wouldn't let somebody stay in my rentals for free people need to pay their rent or buy their own house. It seems to me people that don't have a house of their own and has to rent and has to depend on a landlord for a place to live think they should not get evicted for non payment of rent. Not everybody thinks that way but it seems a lot of people think a landlords owes them a place to live. Well its not a landlords place to house people for free.

    • @stevengoldstein114
      @stevengoldstein114 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnniebeavers4003 But in CA in 1995 the LANDLORDS promised affordable housing to pass the Costa Hawkins and Ellis Acts. They made a false promise to avoid market regulations. So yes the DID take that responsibility. The same went for the Reagan Admin, privatizing public housing. The same FALSE promise. And so now the population growth is nearly zero and the housing shortages were designed to force prices up. When the population starts dropping, and it will, the market will implode

    • @georgewagner7787
      @georgewagner7787 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I can't afford to House people for free i barely earned 30,000 when i was working and now I'm retired my first tenant got behind on the rent and finally i told her if she didn't catch up i was gonna have to sell so now she's catching up she's good people but i can't support other adults i have a lot of medical bills