@@DoDaDaDaDaCaDa or reincarnation of 1840's~ jonn brown and his men, one of them i believe was Samuel price 😉, or early experience with UAW and coal mining protesters etc, government officials or elites will not contain that as this has been tried before historically and fails in some cases escalated into civil war etc war crimes that anonymous members exposed was the right choice as if Germans 1946 can't do horrible things neither should the USA 🇺🇸 etc same for scumbag corporation/elites they should be held accountable for their choice's and actions equally, as far as some of A acts/method's im on the fences about or at least sympathy to as a group but count me out joining/associating them in general, political ( even mid-riots, as it's better to let steam-off then assignation/coo's happen etc ) protests should be protected as the other outcome is violence or failed-government which is worse outcome's
Anonymous just like mist Americans don't believe in sourcing your information on history. I mean they were there to see moors as white people. Maybe Anonymous can time travel.
The problem with trying to pin down Anonymous is that it’s not REALLY an organized group. There is a core of high level hackers that interact with one another, but it’s closer to a movement than a singular organization.
a core ? are you even on the IRC rooms ? hackers are a very small part of most ops everyone has skills to offer in most ops. And as for the hacking most ops use well know vulnerabilities known as CVEs no real pentesting needs to be done in most cases. You cant track down anon because we are all anon, No one face runs anon its a social movement
@tropics8407 Thay just it, the feds don't care about the little guys. That's way ransomware and blackmail are so lucrative as long as you stick with the small fish
@davidmccoin2547 Yeah I mean you're not wrong. Hacker is pretty vague and broad definition. And a lot of scammers and phishers like to call themselves hackers
Moral to the story.The state will go to any length to continue it's self appointed right to carry out their daily vile activities and their corporate enablers.
The crazy thing is that if you really think about it, the corporations the government protects doesn't even contribute in a meaningful way. They're all evading taxes, etc. So what am I missing? Seems like the government would tell corporations "good luck"
@@Nauticunt mate, please don't comment if you can neither: a. Watch the video in full b. Refuse to read comments which answer your very question (within this comment thread in fact) The video does state it, people have commented as such, and yet you chose to be ignorant?!
we need their authorization to protest? protesting is a human right - it is socialist and left wing, but it is our right to speak disapproval and disdain with what our government is doing
Shawn Henry recommends legal avenues of cyber protesting. I've tried protesting a local smelter and raising awareness to the danger of toxic metal fumes and Ring, the doorbell camera company, took down my posts and wrote that their service was not to be used for political purposes. Public Health should never be political.
Local AQMD requires 6 or more people during off hours to call before they will dispatch an inspector. A lighter than daytime crew, large area to cover and contributions to local politicians and school district prevent any meaningful investigation. Most offgassing is done after business hours. The smelter is directly adjacent to a junior high school. An indoor gymnasium was even constructed with donations from the foundry. The odor is strongly metallic and slightly chlorinated. I have canvassed the area and neighbors report the issue when asked, but not really motivated to call or too busy to notice. Complacency is what this company is depending on to continue operating.
@Player-pj9kt Specifically, no. My Ring cameras only cover the immediate area. I typically would post a notification when they offgassed and provided the phone number asking neighbors to report the foundry. That was enough to get my posts removed.
Side note, A LOT of British people still say Guy Fawkes (2:20) was the last person to enter parliament with true intentions - meaning we know every other person (politician) is a liar!
Wow there, a couple of people might have because they do tours right? Or maybe someone who doesn't know what building it is wandered in for a few seconds! hahahahaha
"Anarchy is no guarantee that some people won't kill, injure, kidnap, defraud, or steal from others. Government is a guarantee that some will." Gustave de Molinari
With the camera angles, those railroad tracks and that crossing, the fact Vice straight up gave his country of origin away (he said Canada, not me), it would be incredibly easy to pin Bio down. For a hacker he should probably know better. Makes me think Vice slapped a bandana on a kid and told him to start talking hacker.
I agree. I very much doubt the person interviewed in the end is the real Bio. And I don't think VICE intended for us to believe he was either. It's just a stylistic choice to have someone stand in and act out Bio's answers rather than going the classic route of darkening or blurring the shots.
The Canadian government doesn't give two shits about some skid with LOIC. Anonymous has been a complete joke ever since it was founded and doubly so in the last few years, no one cares enough to track him down.
pre Reagan president railroaders and UAW and teamsters would love to force FBI man to reality that's false information historically but his right about corporation villains/violence ( and the ww1 bonus-army and president firing on veterans asking/peacefully protesting for assistance ) against average people in the USA 🇺🇸
unfortunately, with the current events and protests for Palestine, we see that any protest against the government's decisions is not going to be tolerated. Free speech, but until you speak against the leaders.
Was the lady named Mercedez Nohaver? That names slightly funny if you think about it 😂 Esp since she probably "wouldnt be caught dead in a Mercedes", which her name reflects perfeftly 😊
I used to be part of Anonymous while ago. We were a movement that was structured by a process, we were never an organisation. I still don't know anyone by names, we all used username, P2P channels, we had to collaborate on tasks that we believe they helped humanity in general and that was the only common thing. We voted on many things to avoid any bias in many decisions and that's pretty much it from my experience. I used to be part of operations in WikiLeaks about the Arab spring, the Israeli occupation, and US elections.
I don"t know if you are lying, or if you were lied to, but there is no "process" inside anonymous or anything like that. Anonymous is a descentralized movement, the groups that call themselves anonymous can have a process and even a hierarchy, but they are only a part of the movement, there was lots of well know groups that called themselves anonymous, some good, others not so much, and there always will be since anyone can say "I am an anonymous". Nowadays, most people who calls themselves anonymous is just a script kid, lammer, or a troll. Big groups who make large data breaches and use the name anonymous do that because it is a great marketing strategy, and it is no secret to anyone, after all, if your company is being attacked by a group who call themselves anonymous and you are not an expert, you are most likely to pay what they are charging you, because it is a "group" that you know that have made great things before. But probably it is not event them who are attacking you, and just a bunch of indians making scams in small companies
@@DoubleStandardGaming crashing implies it has stopped working completely. Overloading it through a ddos attack isn't strictly crashing it, it's just decreasingly the likelihood of authentic data being processed.
@@AnEntityBrowsingYTthat is true, but at some point like if only 10% of the processed data is legitimate, and, or, its users have problems its a crash. Todays ddos attacks are more sophisticated tho, and so are the counter measures. Its an ongoing battle for both sides.
In computing, a crash, or system crash, occurs when a computer program such as a software application or an operating system stops functioning properly. So, a successful DDoS attack does leads to a crash. And nowadays it is not so hard if you have money to do it, there are giant farms made for you to rent and attack an specific target with more than 100 million requests per second
@@JAODc-fo9gf Well i guess that depends on your definition of 'properly' The system is still functioning, it is processing each request just as it was programmed to do. So I'll hold true to my original comment, A DDoS attack doesn't necessarily mean a service has crashed.
Hey, how did you do this? could you point me towards some helpful resources to learn hacking for the same purpose? I want to strengthen defenses of our country by trying to stop scammer types from praying on the UKs elderly, one of my friends grandfathers took his own life after being scammed his money in some manner. I'd be starting from the ground up so even if some site linked me to resources I could use would be excellent. Thanks :)
As someone whos been around the block I can definitely confirm "none of these targets where particularly difficult to hack. A 3 year old could do it" is very true. I always tell people those systems aren't as secure as they make it out to be, and the small handful of people that have any kind of knowledge on them can easily find exploits. Or just take a system down entirely.
@@coolinmac I'm a Net and Sys admin who works for the government. You're a kid living In your parents basement trying to compensate for something. The fact you provided 0 evidence already says enough about your claim. Sounds like I'm a little more qualified to talk about what I, myself, know. Go back to watching tick tock like a good kid.
@@silvy7394 they provided as much evidence for their claims as you did yours Sounds like someone talking out of their (you know what) to me just saying
They have done credit bureaus I believe, insurance companies have been regular hacked but likely would be a huge liability if they made a big public fuss. However, I'm aware of scammers blackmailing an elderly man running a financial business and they nearly wiped him out. Really sad... But that wasn't anonymous, just scammers. As an IT specialist, my honest best advice is to store as much private info in paper files offline. For voting, in person, paper ballots with purple thumb ink. Perfect security is impossible, especially if the software requires maintenance or logins that people often forget, so someone needs to gain access on a locked system, hence backdoors and keys for the IT specialists. So there's always a built in vulnerability besides any accidental ones. 😎👍
They've gone after many people, companies, countries, etc. They're more about the world rather than just the US or one country. They've helped with finding evidence on the Epstein case, punishing bad leaders/government in diff countries, provided aid to people in need and more. They're not as insanely strict like they were in early 2000-2015 but they still do some stuff here and there. Early 2000s Anonymous were a bunch of demons LMFAO, no corrupted person/company/country was safe
@@igaraider governments are run by politicians who are always corrupt. But like cops, many politicians do good things throughout their career at one point or another. Corporations on the other hand are not humans and care not for humanity, only profit, by design. Some are exceptionally worse than others. Yet, these vigilante hackers never target the most evil of corporations. Shame
Same, except even earlier. The days of when AOL was the main gateway that the average person had for getting onto the internet and broadband was right on the cusp of becoming widely available, were wild as hell, truly the wild west times.
@@Stryke_Gently I’m sure there are a some that would, but back then it was more common even among the lesser skilled people. From pirating to basically running IT in corporates, these were normal things then.
Yeah, but I thin that's the point, right? That it goes two ways: Governments can't expect that people will protest using only the "authorized methods," and protesters can't expect that protesting outside of authorized ways will results in anything less than arrest.
@@andrewnavarro1185 I mean only if those being protested don't capitulate, and then choose to use force to subjugate. I mean it doesn't HAVE to be that way, the way you're suggesting. But a protest is, be definition, not authorized. So if a protest is authorized, it is not a protest. Sort of a tautological thing, ya know.
@@SpencerRoberg Protests can definitely be legally authorized and still be protests. There are legal and illegal versions of strikes and marches, and there are consequences for the illegal ones. It DOES have to be that way unless we vote to change those laws, because laws are required to be enforced.
How did you manage to get all these guys on camera??? I’ve followed this story for years and I’ve never seen people like tflow and anon panda on camera
Wrong. Nobody is in Anonymous, and everyone is in Anonymous. It's NOT a group with members. Some rando calls out something, enough people agree and pass it on, making the round until enough people capable of taking action get wind of it. "We are Anonymous" is a call to action more than anything. Now you're Anonymous, now you're not. That's why enforcement will never be able to "catch everyone". They mostly catch individuals or small groups of friends that aligned behind a shared thought ideal. It's called a Stand Alone Complex. =)
Nobody likes a snitch... Said no1 ever. Unless they went through some other unfortunate things but I am not about this life.This is ppl too intricate & patient for me. So, In short they snitched on each other & 1 side got locked up & the other whole 1 went and worked for the man? That should turn out great. Sounds like a movie.
That is not the real Bio, I can almost guarantee that it's a stand-in for what was a text interview or POSSIBLY a conversation over telephone (but I doubt it).
@@DiscoPornoSatan I agree, DiscoPornoSatan. That was my second thought. You would have to br incredibly dumb to show yourself in that way and where you are (wherever that bridge is), so it wouldn't make sense for someone who's truly wanted to out themselves like that. Why they didn't go for just reading what he wrote, but instead wanting someone to appear on camera is just dumb. Sure it's better if you can hear the person themselves, but if it's not that person themselves, it's stoopid.
Shawn Henry recommends legal avenues of cyber protesting. I've tried protesting a local smelter and raising awareness to the danger of toxic metal fumes and Ring, the doorbell camera company, took down my posts and wrote that their service was not to be used for political purposes. Public Health should never be political.
10:42 - My god, the joke, the socially awkward delivery, the pause after that lame programer joke. It's just some top notch quality cringe. Chef's kiss. 👌🏼
Anonymous is full of skids and always have been. They did basic attacks and always had. They weren't hackers but more of people who use hacking tools that were so basic but effective because the lack of security back in the day, they didn't create exploits/tools etc like an actual experienced hacker/pentester or lived up to their hype. Btw you sound cringey saying that just glazing anonymous
It's always fascinating to delve into the origins of significant movements and groups, especially in the digital age. Anonymous has certainly had a huge impact on the landscape of online activism and digital culture. Exploring their beginnings not only gives us a clearer understanding of their motives and actions but also offers a unique perspective on the evolution of internet communities and cyber activism. It's intriguing to see how groups like these have shaped the dialogue around digital privacy and freedom of speech. What an engaging and thought-provoking topic!
I happened to be one of the few people walking past Anonymous’ first gathering, a protest outside a Scientology center in Portland, like 20 years ago. My mother stopped and talked with the one guy there who wasn’t wearing a mask, a former prominent Scientologist. It’s crazy I had something to do with a turning point in history.
@@TheMrleeyang honestly, it’s strange you’d react with such animosity. It would seem you subconsciously connote some sort of inherent worth to someone who would witness what I did, which is even more strange, because I certainly didn’t imply that. It’s a weird thing to be jealous of. I’m sure there’s plenty of things you’re good at, so there’s no reason to react like that. Maybe seeing a therapist would be good, especially if you think speaking like that is normal or appropriate.
@@graceg3250 Nah...maybe you should see a therapist, dude. You're the one thinking you "had something to do with a turning point in history" just because your mom talked to someone who actually did.
I was in my elementary school days when Anonymous was big. I remember being intrigued by their mission and collective strength at a young age. To me, the Anonymous collective is synonymous with online childhood memories and the days before TH-cam and Google became blatantly flooded with advertisements and censorship.
6:35 what's the difference between a DDOS attack and blocking freeways or blocking entrances to stores in protest .. in my opinion nothing... so why is ddosing illegal?
Why? If they hacked into your computer and exposed your life would you feel the same? They exposed serious state secrets, that's why they are called secrets. If they hack into a criminal org. it's fine with me, but who are these young kids to determine who needs hacking?
@@sniferlip because the state shouldn't have secrets. In a democracy, everyone should be equal and share the same knowledge. No one group or individual, whether government or the wealthy, should have power over everyone else.
@@sniferlipSo you trust the NSA with all your data but the other way around is too much? Do you remember the war crimes that were uncovered with these leaks? People risk jail just to reveal the horrors executed by the state.
The thing about the FBI letting Stratfor get hacked... it's a valid point. The other side of the coin is that if they had prevented the hack, then fewer Anonymous members would have been vulnerable to prosecution... which, realistically, means that they (Anonymous members) would have wandered off and found another target. Or come back at Stratfor some other time. So, as the saying goes, the FBI gave the Anonymous members enough rope to hang themselves. I'm no cheerleader for many of the things the FBI has done, but from their perspective, the Stratfor thing was a rational decision. Ultimately, the question in this type of situation is whether or not society wants police to be able to take action on someone they *think* is going to do something, or do we want the police to wait until someone has *actually* done that thing?
Anonymous is anyone who truly cares about freedom in my opinion. That doesn't mean you have to actively participate in their campaigns, just being a supporter is enough. They wont find them because it could be any/all of of us.
Meeting the FBI spy at a bar to confirm that anonymous are, in fact, anonymous, is brilliant.
Yeah that was pointless. Just not have got anything useful from that interview.
The only thing I got out of that is that governments don't like protests that they can't ignore
What I got from this is that Anonymous is the goverment.
@@DoDaDaDaDaCaDa or reincarnation of 1840's~ jonn brown and his men, one of them i believe was Samuel price 😉, or early experience with UAW and coal mining protesters etc, government officials or elites will not contain that as this has been tried before historically and fails in some cases escalated into civil war etc
war crimes that anonymous members exposed was the right choice as if Germans 1946 can't do horrible things neither should the USA 🇺🇸 etc same for scumbag corporation/elites they should be held accountable for their choice's and actions equally, as far as some of A acts/method's im on the fences about or at least sympathy to as a group but count me out joining/associating them in general, political ( even mid-riots, as it's better to let steam-off then assignation/coo's happen etc ) protests should be protected as the other outcome is violence or failed-government which is worse outcome's
Anonymous just like mist Americans don't believe in sourcing your information on history. I mean they were there to see moors as white people. Maybe Anonymous can time travel.
The problem with trying to pin down Anonymous is that it’s not REALLY an organized group. There is a core of high level hackers that interact with one another, but it’s closer to a movement than a singular organization.
a core ? are you even on the IRC rooms ? hackers are a very small part of most ops everyone has skills to offer in most ops. And as for the hacking most ops use well know vulnerabilities known as CVEs no real pentesting needs to be done in most cases. You cant track down anon because we are all anon, No one face runs anon its a social movement
Exactly that they aren't centralized obviously
@@sud0gh0styou better check your opsec and get out of comment sections
@@sud0gh0stdude said what you just said lol
keyboard warrior with zero clue how to hack lol @@sud0gh0st
Nobody cares about hackers until someone wealthy loses money
Little shitty companies are being extorted now
@tropics8407 Thay just it, the feds don't care about the little guys. That's way ransomware and blackmail are so lucrative as long as you stick with the small fish
Those are not really hackers, they are phishing.
@davidmccoin2547 Yeah I mean you're not wrong. Hacker is pretty vague and broad definition. And a lot of scammers and phishers like to call themselves hackers
Well yeah, the politicians have to protect their sugardaddies. 😁
"Ideas are bulletproof"
-Vendetta
"everyone has rights or I don't have rights." Fckn gold right there
😂😂😂😂
Moral to the story.The state will go to any length to continue it's self appointed right to carry out their daily vile activities and their corporate enablers.
Of course. The “law” exists for us only.
The crazy thing is that if you really think about it, the corporations the government protects doesn't even contribute in a meaningful way. They're all evading taxes, etc. So what am I missing? Seems like the government would tell corporations "good luck"
Its starts with a J and ends in ěŵs. They are ew looking too
The corporations provide what the government can’t/ won’t do for the public. The two evils have so much to gain from supporting one another.
@@McToasterBathcorporations is how they run the country without being regulated and non profits
to be clear: this episode is from during/before 2020. hammond was released Nov 2020
2016 according to the description.
22:24
yeah the video mentions that fact, dude.
@@Nauticunt mate, please don't comment if you can neither:
a. Watch the video in full
b. Refuse to read comments which answer your very question (within this comment thread in fact)
The video does state it, people have commented as such, and yet you chose to be ignorant?!
They're recycling videos because they're BROKE.
This program should be an hour long.
Oh yeah, would love that! ❤
Or longerrrfrrrr gadam could be wayyy longer
Should be a 3 hour long movie.
Mathematics!
I wouldn't watched it if it is an hour long.
Balance, my friend. Balance) ❤
"There are "authorized" ways that people can protest." Spoken like a true authoritarian.
wow this comment just made me see the connection authority and authorized for the first time hahaha. Cant believe I missed that my entire life
#1312 couldnt be more right
So if you don't like something you should be allowed to do whatever you want against them?
@@mikeb2675 I don’t think you get to choose how people protest. I don’t think that’s how it works.
we need their authorization to protest? protesting is a human right - it is socialist and left wing, but it is our right to speak disapproval and disdain with what our government is doing
The fact they admit how easy was to hack down corporate targets clearly expose how vulnerable is the system we live in.
Hopefully it continues so we can be free of our current slavery adjacent servitude.
It's shocking how Watch Dogs games in a way predicted the events.
Just for a note. At 4:20, the point of the black faxes was so it would use all of the ink in the fax machine. It's funny and kinda genius.
I would have made it cyan 🤣🤣🤣
@@DubultaisT damn, some people really do wake up and choose violence
4:20 yeah
I was thinking the same thing, thanks for confirming 😂
Cyan cat faxes @@DubultaisT
5:08 "scentogy cured my dislexia" 😂😂
Thank Dog four that
Shawn Henry recommends legal avenues of cyber protesting. I've tried protesting a local smelter and raising awareness to the danger of toxic metal fumes and Ring, the doorbell camera company, took down my posts and wrote that their service was not to be used for political purposes. Public Health should never be political.
WOW that is ridiculous
what happened? did u use your doorbell footage and post it online?
Local AQMD requires 6 or more people during off hours to call before they will dispatch an inspector. A lighter than daytime crew, large area to cover and contributions to local politicians and school district prevent any meaningful investigation. Most offgassing is done after business hours. The smelter is directly adjacent to a junior high school. An indoor gymnasium was even constructed with donations from the foundry. The odor is strongly metallic and slightly chlorinated. I have canvassed the area and neighbors report the issue when asked, but not really motivated to call or too busy to notice. Complacency is what this company is depending on to continue operating.
@Player-pj9kt Specifically, no. My Ring cameras only cover the immediate area. I typically would post a notification when they offgassed and provided the phone number asking neighbors to report the foundry. That was enough to get my posts removed.
Everyone knows ring can only be used for their own corpo political purposes.
Side note, A LOT of British people still say Guy Fawkes (2:20) was the last person to enter parliament with true intentions - meaning we know every other person (politician) is a liar!
Wow there, a couple of people might have because they do tours right? Or maybe someone who doesn't know what building it is wandered in for a few seconds! hahahahaha
"Anarchy is no guarantee that some people won't kill, injure, kidnap, defraud, or steal from others. Government is a guarantee that some will." Gustave de Molinari
"you can't jail an idea"
Every dictatorship tries anyway
ask the 7 from chicago
The people with the ideas however...
except China CCP
Nah. US is just weak. China seems capable of completely controlling their populace.
Org’s like Anonymous are absolutely needed to defend regular citizens
Sure. But without the stupid masks
Untill they fixate on you. If they do, you’re history. Never give to much power to a nerd. Their self hatred will come out in ceros and ones
@@axelmenzel773 *too
@@charjl96they probably watching you right now while youre using your phone in the northern parts of somewhere.
@@parengthonycastillo4272 true
With the camera angles, those railroad tracks and that crossing, the fact Vice straight up gave his country of origin away (he said Canada, not me), it would be incredibly easy to pin Bio down. For a hacker he should probably know better. Makes me think Vice slapped a bandana on a kid and told him to start talking hacker.
I agree. I very much doubt the person interviewed in the end is the real Bio. And I don't think VICE intended for us to believe he was either.
It's just a stylistic choice to have someone stand in and act out Bio's answers rather than going the classic route of darkening or blurring the shots.
The Canadian government doesn't give two shits about some skid with LOIC. Anonymous has been a complete joke ever since it was founded and doubly so in the last few years, no one cares enough to track him down.
It could be a text interview with the real Bio. Then VICE found an actor and replayed the conversation.
I 100% know the area and have used it as a back up location for a music video in 2018
@@eluna34 Was it a flute video? Do people make flute videos? IDK
This is from their Cyberwar series and is quite old, seems many people don't know that. All episodes are a must watch!
The lack of eye contact is strong in these interviewees
Huh, I wonder if it’s cuz they’re all socially awkward? No it couldn’t possibly be that… let’s keep thinking… hmmmm…
“there are ways of protests that we allow and disrupting corporations is not one of them” -former FBI man
pre Reagan president railroaders and UAW and teamsters would love to force FBI man to reality that's false information historically but his right about corporation villains/violence ( and the ww1 bonus-army and president firing on veterans asking/peacefully protesting for assistance ) against average people in the USA 🇺🇸
in other words "you can protest in that corner but if you annoy the people that is causing you to protest in the first place I'll get very very cross"
fuk yo feelings
unfortunately, with the current events and protests for Palestine, we see that any protest against the government's decisions is not going to be tolerated. Free speech, but until you speak against the leaders.
Boycotting is great also don't buy no more post bad things about them.
Making the Guy Fawkes mask iconic.
Was the lady named Mercedez Nohaver? That names slightly funny if you think about it 😂
Esp since she probably "wouldnt be caught dead in a Mercedes", which her name reflects perfeftly 😊
@@jonslg240 yeh... I know right it did sound weird. She's cute though!
Guy fawkes did that bri the og terrorist
It's appropriate I guess. Fawkes ratted on everyone that he knew as well.
I used to be part of Anonymous while ago. We were a movement that was structured by a process, we were never an organisation. I still don't know anyone by names, we all used username, P2P channels, we had to collaborate on tasks that we believe they helped humanity in general and that was the only common thing. We voted on many things to avoid any bias in many decisions and that's pretty much it from my experience. I used to be part of operations in WikiLeaks about the Arab spring, the Israeli occupation, and US elections.
Thank you❤❤❤❤ you are being a voice for the voiceless and helping fight back against oppression
Oh you were? What was your handle back then?
I dunno if you remember me…
LMFAOOOO
I don"t know if you are lying, or if you were lied to, but there is no "process" inside anonymous or anything like that. Anonymous is a descentralized movement, the groups that call themselves anonymous can have a process and even a hierarchy, but they are only a part of the movement, there was lots of well know groups that called themselves anonymous, some good, others not so much, and there always will be since anyone can say "I am an anonymous". Nowadays, most people who calls themselves anonymous is just a script kid, lammer, or a troll. Big groups who make large data breaches and use the name anonymous do that because it is a great marketing strategy, and it is no secret to anyone, after all, if your company is being attacked by a group who call themselves anonymous and you are not an expert, you are most likely to pay what they are charging you, because it is a "group" that you know that have made great things before. But probably it is not event them who are attacking you, and just a bunch of indians making scams in small companies
"A three year old could do it"
Fam i gotta reset my passwords almost every time im asked. Not sure what three year olds this guys met. 😂
The exploits were too easy to gain access
I would have completely refused to appear on camera if I were him.
it’s ironic @7:16 he says Stealing and breaching isn’t a way to go about something but this whole nation is built on that 🤦🏾♂️
Yeah a very messed up world we live in, with many ironies. Same as arresting drug dealers, yet the Gubment is the biggest drug peddlers around.
As is every other nation ever.
The pizzas and black faxes is just gold.
I feel bad for the pizza guy.
A DDoS attack doesn't necessarily crash a service, it simply floods it with noisy data so that the service cannot process legitimate data
So essentially it "crashes" the service, what you just described lol. Its in the name. Denial of service.
@@DoubleStandardGaming crashing implies it has stopped working completely. Overloading it through a ddos attack isn't strictly crashing it, it's just decreasingly the likelihood of authentic data being processed.
@@AnEntityBrowsingYTthat is true, but at some point like if only 10% of the processed data is legitimate, and, or, its users have problems its a crash. Todays ddos attacks are more sophisticated tho, and so are the counter measures. Its an ongoing battle for both sides.
In computing, a crash, or system crash, occurs when a computer program such as a software application or an operating system stops functioning properly. So, a successful DDoS attack does leads to a crash. And nowadays it is not so hard if you have money to do it, there are giant farms made for you to rent and attack an specific target with more than 100 million requests per second
@@JAODc-fo9gf Well i guess that depends on your definition of 'properly'
The system is still functioning, it is processing each request just as it was programmed to do. So I'll hold true to my original comment, A DDoS attack doesn't necessarily mean a service has crashed.
These guys are the ones made me in love with IT and ended up learning Cybersecurity ❤
Hey, how did you do this? could you point me towards some helpful resources to learn hacking for the same purpose? I want to strengthen defenses of our country by trying to stop scammer types from praying on the UKs elderly, one of my friends grandfathers took his own life after being scammed his money in some manner.
I'd be starting from the ground up so even if some site linked me to resources I could use would be excellent.
Thanks :)
That fine line between genius and insanity...
We need a report for Julian Assange..
He's probably dead now, unfortunately.
And most people won't even know who he was nor what he did
no he's not dead, iirc Australia recently turned in his favor
@@CockatooDude he isnt dead but he is in a very bad mental state
He's in jail in the UK, his wife, and 2 little kids still in London, all scared he will be extradited to the US, which would be very bad for him.
As someone whos been around the block I can definitely confirm "none of these targets where particularly difficult to hack. A 3 year old could do it" is very true. I always tell people those systems aren't as secure as they make it out to be, and the small handful of people that have any kind of knowledge on them can easily find exploits. Or just take a system down entirely.
You are also trying to sound like you know what you’re talking about yet you don’t.
@@coolinmac I'm a Net and Sys admin who works for the government. You're a kid living In your parents basement trying to compensate for something.
The fact you provided 0 evidence already says enough about your claim.
Sounds like I'm a little more qualified to talk about what I, myself, know.
Go back to watching tick tock like a good kid.
@@silvy7394 i believe you!
@@silvy7394
they provided as much evidence for their claims
as you did yours
Sounds like someone talking out of their (you know what) to me
just saying
@@silvy7394 Whatever you are, you shouldn't be advertising it online. Your making yourself a target.
"The 90's called and it wants it's fkn security vulnerabilities back" hahahah
We need a part 2!
It’s here kid thanks for ur ssc
10:41 - 10:45 😂😂😂😂 bro really thought he ate that one look at his face! Haha.
I like that Vice us posting or reposting stuff from 2016 and 2017, their best years.
I think them going to North Korea is their best years.
Agreed but I gotta say this is the vice content I like. Before I feel like the good doco outweighed the bad ones but the opposite now@@tecpaocelotl
@@tecpaocelotl
They shouldn't have come back.
i think vice basically went completely under.
? not sure they'd even have new content to publish
@@veryhuman7472 every now and then, a short piece comes out. But Vice as we used to know it is gone.
We miss this era.
Man I wish they would go after the truly evil companies like insurance and credit bureaus.
They have done credit bureaus I believe, insurance companies have been regular hacked but likely would be a huge liability if they made a big public fuss.
However, I'm aware of scammers blackmailing an elderly man running a financial business and they nearly wiped him out. Really sad... But that wasn't anonymous, just scammers.
As an IT specialist, my honest best advice is to store as much private info in paper files offline.
For voting, in person, paper ballots with purple thumb ink.
Perfect security is impossible, especially if the software requires maintenance or logins that people often forget, so someone needs to gain access on a locked system, hence backdoors and keys for the IT specialists. So there's always a built in vulnerability besides any accidental ones. 😎👍
evil governments
They've gone after many people, companies, countries, etc. They're more about the world rather than just the US or one country. They've helped with finding evidence on the Epstein case, punishing bad leaders/government in diff countries, provided aid to people in need and more. They're not as insanely strict like they were in early 2000-2015 but they still do some stuff here and there. Early 2000s Anonymous were a bunch of demons LMFAO, no corrupted person/company/country was safe
Seriously
@@igaraider governments are run by politicians who are always corrupt. But like cops, many politicians do good things throughout their career at one point or another. Corporations on the other hand are not humans and care not for humanity, only profit, by design. Some are exceptionally worse than others. Yet, these vigilante hackers never target the most evil of corporations. Shame
15:08 Sabu single handedly set back social progress. By getting Jeremy caught.
Don't forget that this is a re-upload. Vice hasn't put out content this good in years
2007-2014 IT was wild
Kids today wouldn’t believe the things we did in our teens/early 20s 😂😂
Likewise 98-200X
Same, except even earlier. The days of when AOL was the main gateway that the average person had for getting onto the internet and broadband was right on the cusp of becoming widely available, were wild as hell, truly the wild west times.
Casual. It’s only gotten wilder. Kids today would run circles around you.
@Alan-gy9ws maybe you because you have a one month account but kids in the early 00's had some skills also
@@Stryke_Gently I’m sure there are a some that would, but back then it was more common even among the lesser skilled people. From pirating to basically running IT in corporates, these were normal things then.
An "authorized protest" is not a protest, lol.
Yeah, but I thin that's the point, right? That it goes two ways:
Governments can't expect that people will protest using only the "authorized methods," and protesters can't expect that protesting outside of authorized ways will results in anything less than arrest.
@@andrewnavarro1185 I mean only if those being protested don't capitulate, and then choose to use force to subjugate. I mean it doesn't HAVE to be that way, the way you're suggesting. But a protest is, be definition, not authorized. So if a protest is authorized, it is not a protest. Sort of a tautological thing, ya know.
@@SpencerRoberg Protests can definitely be legally authorized and still be protests. There are legal and illegal versions of strikes and marches, and there are consequences for the illegal ones. It DOES have to be that way unless we vote to change those laws, because laws are required to be enforced.
@andrewnavarro1185 Wrong this isnt 1930s Germany.
Dude looks so uncomfortable hunched over that table.
There's a difference between a hacker and a terrorist.
music balance is too loud for how quiet these interviews are
Simple answer, anonymous isn't one group. It's a lot of groups and people with similar ideals.
it's such a good tactic, another group called ALF does the same where if you have the same ideology, you're a part of them.
The good ol days. When the internet didn't sucked
We do not forget.
Bring this show back
How did you manage to get all these guys on camera??? I’ve followed this story for years and I’ve never seen people like tflow and anon panda on camera
a lot of these guys are "tapped" out, meaning they are not active in ops. It wouldn't be a problem them coming out on camera
@@sanantohomie man how do they even find each other is 4chan still a thing or is everyone on discord now lol
if youre in anonymous, you never tell anyone that youre in anonymous
Wrong. Nobody is in Anonymous, and everyone is in Anonymous. It's NOT a group with members. Some rando calls out something, enough people agree and pass it on, making the round until enough people capable of taking action get wind of it. "We are Anonymous" is a call to action more than anything. Now you're Anonymous, now you're not. That's why enforcement will never be able to "catch everyone". They mostly catch individuals or small groups of friends that aligned behind a shared thought ideal.
It's called a Stand Alone Complex. =)
I just renewed my membership card for another 4 years gg
@@sanantohomieI thought u only played video games
@@mistakoolthe internetz is my video game as the infamous fox11 newscast on anon says " treating the web like a real life video game..." LOLZ
Nobody likes a snitch... Said no1 ever. Unless they went through some other unfortunate things but I am not about this life.This is ppl too intricate & patient for me. So, In short they snitched on each other & 1 side got locked up & the other whole 1 went and worked for the man? That should turn out great. Sounds like a movie.
19:46 - "Bio could go to jail, if his identity is revealed".
*Basically shows the guys whole face, his voice inflection and body type*
That is not the real Bio, I can almost guarantee that it's a stand-in for what was a text interview or POSSIBLY a conversation over telephone (but I doubt it).
@@DiscoPornoSatan
I agree, DiscoPornoSatan.
That was my second thought. You would have to br incredibly dumb to show yourself in that way and where you are (wherever that bridge is), so it wouldn't make sense for someone who's truly wanted to out themselves like that.
Why they didn't go for just reading what he wrote, but instead wanting someone to appear on camera is just dumb. Sure it's better if you can hear the person themselves, but if it's not that person themselves, it's stoopid.
Shawn Henry recommends legal avenues of cyber protesting. I've tried protesting a local smelter and raising awareness to the danger of toxic metal fumes and Ring, the doorbell camera company, took down my posts and wrote that their service was not to be used for political purposes. Public Health should never be political.
10:42 - My god, the joke, the socially awkward delivery, the pause after that lame programer joke. It's just some top notch quality cringe. Chef's kiss. 👌🏼
Good stuff!
Hat-Tip to the hackers out there fighting the good fight
been waiting for this one
"Basically he's the internet loud mouth"..😂😂😂
Me no you
Salute. Great storytelling, really great work.
Anonymous isn’t an entity. It is a collective.
Wow so powerful dude 😮😱
A collective of virgins maybe lol
Anonymous is full of skids and always have been. They did basic attacks and always had. They weren't hackers but more of people who use hacking tools that were so basic but effective because the lack of security back in the day, they didn't create exploits/tools etc like an actual experienced hacker/pentester or lived up to their hype. Btw you sound cringey saying that just glazing anonymous
@@Marco-wz3pz
Virgin's who got results.
@@Marco-wz3pz It's funny, yet sad how idiots like you continue to portray tech-minded people as wimpy. Your insecurities are showing. 😭😂
Dang, vice hasn’t put something this good out in a long while.
Right. Because it's multiple years old😂😂😂 smfh
hahahahaaaaa@@onlyhannahfans
It's always fascinating to delve into the origins of significant movements and groups, especially in the digital age. Anonymous has certainly had a huge impact on the landscape of online activism and digital culture. Exploring their beginnings not only gives us a clearer understanding of their motives and actions but also offers a unique perspective on the evolution of internet communities and cyber activism. It's intriguing to see how groups like these have shaped the dialogue around digital privacy and freedom of speech. What an engaging and thought-provoking topic!
I wish I had one of these as a friend. Just clever people wish I could learn more obviously for the good but do as a career
Love the command prompt at the beginning of typed on screen graphics.
if you talk to vice as a hacker, drugdealer or criminal you already lost.
depends on what you say during said interview
I happened to be one of the few people walking past Anonymous’ first gathering, a protest outside a Scientology center in Portland, like 20 years ago. My mother stopped and talked with the one guy there who wasn’t wearing a mask, a former prominent Scientologist. It’s crazy I had something to do with a turning point in history.
Erm, no you do not have anything to do with that. Stop overinflating your ego.
@@TheMrleeyang? Because I was a witness?
@@TheMrleeyang honestly, it’s strange you’d react with such animosity. It would seem you subconsciously connote some sort of inherent worth to someone who would witness what I did, which is even more strange, because I certainly didn’t imply that. It’s a weird thing to be jealous of. I’m sure there’s plenty of things you’re good at, so there’s no reason to react like that. Maybe seeing a therapist would be good, especially if you think speaking like that is normal or appropriate.
@@graceg3250 We call those ppl "haters" sir. They aren't living their happiest lives...
@@graceg3250 Nah...maybe you should see a therapist, dude. You're the one thinking you "had something to do with a turning point in history" just because your mom talked to someone who actually did.
The FBI guy says "There are authorized ways to protest" ... Sounds like a "contradictio in treminis" to me.
what an absolute moron, I bet he cant even see the hypocrisy
the most amazing fact : The guy named "AVunit" was never caught, he was one of the members of anonymous and later lulzsec as well..crazy guy
Amazing advice, amazing how spot on this is with the struggle!
I was in my elementary school days when Anonymous was big. I remember being intrigued by their mission and collective strength at a young age. To me, the Anonymous collective is synonymous with online childhood memories and the days before TH-cam and Google became blatantly flooded with advertisements and censorship.
Glad it invokes good memories for you
yea well the name got co opted by a leftist mob defending assange, who broke hacker code revealing personal info.
I remember this, the stuff you were finding on 4chan was crazy
"theres nothing more dangerous than a bored hacker" *nerd emoji* ahhh
Your TH-cam skills are getting better lol
It was never an organized group, by it's nature and namesake anyone could be anonymous. It's potentially everyone.
Thanks vice for keeping the public informed on current issues like anonymous
We are legion
We do not forgive
We do not forget
Expect us
"We Are The Many , They Are The Few" ... 💯%
6:35 what's the difference between a DDOS attack and blocking freeways or blocking entrances to stores in protest
.. in my opinion nothing... so why is ddosing illegal?
Thanks a lot from New Zealand! 🇳🇿
I respect the hell out of these guys.
and girls*
Why? If they hacked into your computer and exposed your life would you feel the same? They exposed serious state secrets, that's why they are called secrets. If they hack into a criminal org. it's fine with me, but who are these young kids to determine who needs hacking?
@@sniferlip because the state shouldn't have secrets. In a democracy, everyone should be equal and share the same knowledge. No one group or individual, whether government or the wealthy, should have power over everyone else.
@@sniferlipSo you trust the NSA with all your data but the other way around is too much?
Do you remember the war crimes that were uncovered with these leaks?
People risk jail just to reveal the horrors executed by the state.
Anon hasn't been relevant in 15 years. Individual cells will always exist but it's never going to be what it was
show me on the doll where Anonymous hurt you
When You arrest someone, you create someone.
The thing about the FBI letting Stratfor get hacked... it's a valid point. The other side of the coin is that if they had prevented the hack, then fewer Anonymous members would have been vulnerable to prosecution... which, realistically, means that they (Anonymous members) would have wandered off and found another target. Or come back at Stratfor some other time. So, as the saying goes, the FBI gave the Anonymous members enough rope to hang themselves. I'm no cheerleader for many of the things the FBI has done, but from their perspective, the Stratfor thing was a rational decision.
Ultimately, the question in this type of situation is whether or not society wants police to be able to take action on someone they *think* is going to do something, or do we want the police to wait until someone has *actually* done that thing?
Best Vice piece in a while
I wonder if Sabu has suffered any consequences for his betrayal. Is he so good (or protected) that he can live his life in peace?
Is it betrayal or is it coming to realize his actions were criminal? I think the latter
@@sniferlip he only did it under threat by the FBI... It's hardly a reflection of his morals
@@sniferlip "Coming to realize" _because you've been pinched_ is betrayal, pure and simple.
I mean he did serve time, was forced to be a white hat & is being monitored for life...if that counts
Sabu works for the feds now, so, yeah
'authorized ways to protest' come on!
you're not the only one who caught that!
We are still here.
We Are Legion For A Reason.
blackdreamhunk2 is still here
moors were black!!!!!!!!
we love u bro
Is it an idea to put the original publication date of these docs in the title? I feel it's essential.
this stuff is brilliant, excellent work by vice
Anonymous does not exist anymore
Our government can change every law they want if stratfor can do it these guys can legally it's a violation of rights to jail them
Vice News High quality documentry Producer.
ANONYMOUS IS AN IDEA, WE HAVE NO LEADERS NOR IS THERE ONE SPECIFIC FOUNDER
Note: Anonymous is not a group but rather a movement
RIP Aaron Swartz❤️
Anonymous is anyone anywhere and thats the power of it. if you understand
he’s all of us
Anonymous is anyone who truly cares about freedom in my opinion. That doesn't mean you have to actively participate in their campaigns, just being a supporter is enough. They wont find them because it could be any/all of of us.
That Irish hacker was hilarious and refreshingly honest
This is dumb. They call me a criminal, why ? I did something illegal, multiple times, and don't plan on stopping. How unjust.
Maybe they'll be back this summer 🤔
I heard that 4chan is a mongolian basket weaving forum, is that true?
He’s a hacker. But do we even know who is this person 4Chan?
it's a tendie trading hub
@@MildMisanthropeMaybeMassiveIt's true
Yes, there was much basket weaving.
Is OP /ourguy/?