Secure Multi-party Computation and the Millionaires' Problem explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @4amalreadyy
    @4amalreadyy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Finally a video that made me understand Yao's Millionaires Problem , Thank you. The pratical example really helped!

  • @the-dark-matter
    @the-dark-matter 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are a legend!

  • @dianaayt
    @dianaayt ปีที่แล้ว

    is Db que thing that will desencripte the function EB(x)?

    • @SecPrivAca
      @SecPrivAca  ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly, Db is the decryption function using Bob's private key.

  • @othercandidate7162
    @othercandidate7162 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why there is an inconsistancy in this video, you said if f(x) in Zi, alice earns more in the beginning, but the result shows f(x) + 1 in Zi, shouldn't it be Bob earns more, but you said Alice earns more?

    • @SecPrivAca
      @SecPrivAca  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, there is a mistake during the theory part of the video. The example is however correct. If f(x)+1 is in Z_i then Alice earns more (as we see in the example).

  • @PMA65537
    @PMA65537 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dislike music in the background.

    • @SecPrivAca
      @SecPrivAca  ปีที่แล้ว

      I have removed it in my later videos.

  • @annaszuchy1735
    @annaszuchy1735 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What happens when there's equality?

    • @SecPrivAca
      @SecPrivAca  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If Bob also earns 8, he would increase all numbers following the 9th number, i.e. 9.67 becomes 10.67
      So, 8.33 would be unchanged and f(x) would be in the series. That means that Alice knows that she does NOT earn more than Bob. She does not know that he earns as much.

  • @ShivananChetia
    @ShivananChetia 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Worst explanation

    • @SecPrivAca
      @SecPrivAca  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what part did you find challenging to understand?