You are the only guy that's ever been explained it in depth I could never figure out what other people were talking about or they say just pick something on the wall or something thank you I'm going to work on that one I'm sure I'll figure it out right away
I debated this... but... maybe I will... I just want it to get out to as many people as possible before copycats jump on so my name is on it. I dunno. I suppose I am not business minded enough.
I would show the base system and keep the table size, speed and XY adjustments for those who pay. Chris - I've watched and read a lot of stuff - and this is far more innovative than anything I've seen.
@@MrAndydavis78 Thanks! I am so torn. I obviously took some videos down today, and while I did get more PDF sales, the channel slowed to a crawl. But I appreciate your feedback on the situation and your compliments of the material.
An easy way to cheat a ball to one side or another is to just adjust your aim 1/4 ball (about 1/2 an inch) to either side and it will adjust 1/2 ball for your target.
Indeed people using it are making it their own and finding cool ways to add to it. Will note this one. Another comment asked about 7 ft distances- i find 80x40 most common, so that is 58/10. = 5.8 -3.3 = 2.5. But yes 3.3 diamonds is the benchmark for any table to begin testing.
Many people report the system translating very well to their home or bar 8 foot table, but not everyone. The biggest issue so far are tables with seriously old/dead rails. In such cases, the fast speed and slow speed aiming points are much closer than rails that are not stiff from age. I cannot promise my numbers work exactly, but they should be close.
I bought a pool table before I bought my house and I put it up in my mom's basement and I had to be quiet at night so I was just kicking and I figured out all these 1 and 1/4 1 1/2 you know one and it was a home Model 8 ft but anyway I had a different system but it's still relative
I've definitely wondered if anyone has tinkered with this before. There is likely other ways to do a similar process. I know people have tried to define the spot in terms of diamonds off the table, but I think I am the first to intentionally align past the target ball. Did you also use the cue as a measuring tool?
This can work for banking too, with the object ball taking the place of the cue ball. I can explain it best after I teach how to adjust for speed, and this routine can actually diagnose the speed of a full ball hit bank shot for any ball position that is possible to bank without a cut. I'll get to it. Stay tuned.
Yes, it adds complexity. But the rebound of a ball off a rail is complex - it is far more related to multiple inputs related to physics rather than a single geometric calculation. Kicks and banks are complex. Simple answers only provide ballpark points of aim. My goal is ridiculous accuracy.
You are the only guy that's ever been explained it in depth I could never figure out what other people were talking about or they say just pick something on the wall or something thank you I'm going to work on that one I'm sure I'll figure it out right away
Glad it makes sense! Let me know if it works for you and any adjustment you need to make.
This system is scary good!
I bought the pdf, and i think these videos should be behind paywall - you're giving the milk away for free!😮
I debated this... but... maybe I will... I just want it to get out to as many people as possible before copycats jump on so my name is on it. I dunno. I suppose I am not business minded enough.
I would show the base system and keep the table size, speed and XY adjustments for those who pay.
Chris - I've watched and read a lot of stuff - and this is far more innovative than anything I've seen.
@@MrAndydavis78 Thanks! I am so torn. I obviously took some videos down today, and while I did get more PDF sales, the channel slowed to a crawl. But I appreciate your feedback on the situation and your compliments of the material.
Very interesting. I will be trying this. Subscribed.
Thanks! Let me know if you get it to work, and if you had to adjust anything.
it worked 100\100 thank you sir
Awesome! Glad it makes sense.
Anytime I watch your videos I bank and kick like a monster for like a month straight 😜
Ha! Awesome!
An easy way to cheat a ball to one side or another is to just adjust your aim 1/4 ball (about 1/2 an inch) to either side and it will adjust 1/2 ball for your target.
Indeed people using it are making it their own and finding cool ways to add to it. Will note this one. Another comment asked about 7 ft distances- i find 80x40 most common, so that is 58/10. = 5.8 -3.3 = 2.5. But yes 3.3 diamonds is the benchmark for any table to begin testing.
Much appreciated. Do you find all 8’ tables work the same or is every 8’ table different?
Many people report the system translating very well to their home or bar 8 foot table, but not everyone. The biggest issue so far are tables with seriously old/dead rails. In such cases, the fast speed and slow speed aiming points are much closer than rails that are not stiff from age. I cannot promise my numbers work exactly, but they should be close.
👍👍🎱
I bought a pool table before I bought my house and I put it up in my mom's basement and I had to be quiet at night so I was just kicking and I figured out all these 1 and 1/4 1 1/2 you know one and it was a home Model 8 ft but anyway I had a different system but it's still relative
I've definitely wondered if anyone has tinkered with this before. There is likely other ways to do a similar process. I know people have tried to define the spot in terms of diamonds off the table, but I think I am the first to intentionally align past the target ball. Did you also use the cue as a measuring tool?
Is this work for banking or just kicking method?
This can work for banking too, with the object ball taking the place of the cue ball. I can explain it best after I teach how to adjust for speed, and this routine can actually diagnose the speed of a full ball hit bank shot for any ball position that is possible to bank without a cut. I'll get to it. Stay tuned.
@@PoolandBilliards Awesome! Thanks for teaching this system
Seems like a super complicated way to do this
Yes, it adds complexity. But the rebound of a ball off a rail is complex - it is far more related to multiple inputs related to physics rather than a single geometric calculation. Kicks and banks are complex. Simple answers only provide ballpark points of aim. My goal is ridiculous accuracy.
This might be what Chris melling use
That'd be wild, because I just invented this method.
I just use my imagination , picture a mirror on the seam
Have you ever aligned a mirror over the rail? I have. It does not produce very good results.