Climate Change - Myth or Reality?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ค. 2024
- Climate Change - Myth or Reality? Patrick Bet-David takes a neutral stance in looking at both sides of the climate change argument.
Are you a climate change scientist, or know an expert on the subject, we want to hear from you - comment below. Subscribe to for all notifications bit.ly/2aPEwD4
Share your thoughts with Patrick Bet-David by texting 310.340.1132 or send a tweet
to / patrickbetdavid
You can reach the Valuetainment team: info@valuetainment.com
External Links and Articles:
Ice melting time lapse and speech by James Balog:
• Time-lapse proof of ex...
vimeo.com/168243535
www.statista.com/statistics/2...
www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-...
vimeo.com/5963395
cleantechnica.com/files/2019/...
• The Biggest Lie About ...
www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/wo...
climate.nasa.gov/causes/
www.co2.earth/co2-ice-core-data
skepticalscience.com/10000-ye...
Other sources to reference:
• The research agrees: H...
• Climate Science: What ...
• What Most People Don't...
• The Biggest Lie About ...
• What is the greenhouse...
www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/wo...
stake-over-russia-sanctions.html
www.co2.earth/co2-ice-core-data
www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck...
climate.nasa.gov/causes/
www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck...
• Albedo Effect Explained
Share your thoughts with Patrick Bet-David by texting 310.340.1132 or click here my.community.com/patrickbetdavid
Why not address the people on the climate change side that have money to gain, its not just the oil and gas companies.
NASA said that the ice is increasing last year, they just can’t definite the depth of the ice.
As a scientist, I argue that climate change takes place non-linearly and exponential. It is slow now, but after few years, non-linear change might happen. Another point that I want to make is that climate change and air pollution are correlated. right? Most of the perturbation that leads to air pollution end up in climate change. Therefore, taking precautions to control climate change is crucial.
Without question, Tony Heller from realclimatescience.com ...
@@sureshkumar-kx2xz I'm curious, are you able to explain how the Laurentide ice sheet was formed? What caused it to disappear almost completely within just about 1,000 years? Why did it form over Canada and not the pole? How did humans survive 300-400 foot increase in global sea levels over the course of a very small time frame? How did humans of around 13,000 years ago survive 18 degree temperature swings over the course of decades?
If we today cannot survive a 1.5 degree temperature change over a century, how did we survive over the last 20,000 years?
If you cannot explain how the climate changes into and out of a glacial period, I don't think there is any consensus over climate change.
There is no consensus over how the global temperature fluctuated 18 degrees on the span of decades when atmospheric CO2 remained stable and low.
The scientific community is at the beginning of understanding global climate change, not the end.
You left out the Ocean that releases more Co2 then anything else in this planet.
Some wise words to be said by the man himself Charlie munger
"I never allow myself to hold an opinion on anything that I don't know the other side's argument better than they do"
Xxsunber - “im convinced I could make my opponents case better than them each time. And we are both better off for it”. Hitchens
My new favorite quote! Thank you!
I never take heed of the words spoken by a dude named "munger".
Although it sounds fancy, his stance on bitcoin shows a CLEAR lack of understanding of what it is. And holding onto his belief so strongly goes exactly, against that.
Activists: We only have 12 years to live.
Banks: _Here is your 50-year mortgage plan_
& for your new ocean front property. Mom renewed her loan for beach house & they didnt say 1 word.
@@kevinodom2918 The bank doesn't hold the mortgage. They have no issues selling it to investors.
'12 years to deal with climate change' - not '12 years to live'. Quite a big difference.
If the 12 years is true in the prospectus it would show that you're screwed.
@@ericmccance4149 Essentially it's the estimate that to cut CO2 emissions to net zero by 2050 (to avoid more than 1.5 Celsius warming), emissions would have to be on a path to fall by about 45 percent by around 2030 (so 11 years now).
When I was a kid in the 80s and 90s our science classes told in in early 2000s global warming was going to cause Florida to be submerged, NYC to be flooded and California to be an island. This is the problem with linear thinking, when clearly our environment works on cycles.
things like that is easy tell: one side wants argument and debate, the other said: debate is over, take whatever I give you. so, it's clear.
@@seanleith5312 Yes. We are the science!
And nothing happened
How does it demonstrate linear thinking? I mean, what do you want to say when using that phrase? People who extrapolate a trend linearly and makes conclusions on it?
@@FrederikFalk21 you got it exactly. The government officials take the studies that feed their agenda and use linear charts. A Lot of gov thinking is if this then that across a trend line. They don't use logarithmic or higher type scales because they don't understand them, only the scientists use those models.
You know he's on to something when they have to put a disclaimer on the page just because he wants people to have an actual conversation about this topic.😏
Great video Patrick
Exactly. Anyone who doesn't have there head up the're butts would see that too
We don't need some idiot TH-cam middleman to pollute the conversation.
Not a mention of chemtrailing yet its being debated in Congress.
If I link it, the algorithm or human censorship will chop this comment, but the debate is about the patented elements known to cause weather modification.
Barium, strontium, and aluminium nano particles are the biggest, with silver dioxide and now graphine oxide proven in laboratory's to be coming out of 100 ton payload jumbo jets times however many are flying every day in every continent.
Could there be an elephant in this room we call the sky?
Let's start with the fact that, long ago, the Earth was 6ﾟ warmer, there were no icecaps, deserts were green and carbon dioxide ppm was in the 1000's not the 100's. The Earth did not burn up and life was thriving. The idea that life will not exist in 12 years is kind of stretch especially since the temperature rise has stalled out since about 1998. I think we have some time for rational discourse.
PS Electric cars, solar panels and windmills are not carbon neutral and have some very real pollution drawbacks. I am all for clean energy but the truth behind our current proposed solutions would be nice. If our C02 output is actually a problem, nuclear is about the only real solution currently.
Reality; Just not because of You @Noel D or Co2.
We live in an electric universe powered by double torus magnets with the Sun's planets & moons held in position by and between the two energies.
The (Galactic) Milankovitch cycles cause our climate cycles with Obliquity causing climate trends between Aphelion & Perihelon with he galactic bulge every 60,000 years, Precession causing cataclysmic END TIMES climate change when our solar system eclipses the centre of our galaxies Magnetic Nucleus at Alpha Omega equinoxes NOW & Eccentricity the 235,000 year rotation of the galactic bulge being the EM driver outside force.
The Antikythera device was a predictor of the (Galactic) Milankovitch cycles.
Jesus warned us about the Anti-Goylumites & these the climate change END TIMES with the book of REVELATION & the cause with the 7 north stars of the PRECESSION of the Alpha Omega equinoxes he held in his hand.
The climate change disasters your witnessing now are just the birthing pains Mother Earth's WATER won't break until 2033 when teh conjunction of the planets pulls the oceans around the planet east to west 800 mph at the equator. And then every 40 years when the planets are in conjunction for the millennium it takes to cross the Milky Way.
The last equinox when we eclipsed the galactic plain was 12,000 years ago as recorded in geological, astronomical, archaeological, Biblical, Vedas, evidence. Sphinx water erosion, Younger dryas boundary layer, Clovis people, Washington scablands, Gobekli Karahn tepe were buried by 19 separate tsunami's spaced 40 years apart spanning a millennium according to Klaus Schmidt's report.
Any time I see the fact-checking "context" warning on a TH-cam video, I know I'm about to see something that is a) going to be good and b) something the tech giants would really like to censor.
TH-cam does often do remove it. I have watched several channels that are gone. I found out they were defunded later removed. They did not fit the corporate line.
Same thought here👋😉
Absolutely ‼️‼️👍🇺🇸
If people don't want u to see it. Theres a massive reason why. And if u can only think of a tiny minor reason, keep looking cause it's bigger then u think
@@garyreed6310 You did ur
Homework.
It's a presentation that needs to be taken seriously. What an amazing guy!
Nice effort, but he's 40 years too late for that.
this typ of content is pure fire. Arguments and counterarguments, clearly presented. epic stuff, I hope to see more.
No. Without empirical evidence that humans are causing climate change, there is no argument. It's simple pseudoscience.
@viktorvaneeden
Yeah, concluded without any evidence. That's a big problem when anyone is trying to prove a story, it's a complete failure when you claim to be a scientist.
@viktorvaneeden
My apologies, I thought you might be someone who required evidence. My mistake.
@@_viktor_w
No. You believe in something for which scientists have no evidence.
I note you have none to offer, either.
Lynchmob mentality?
Anything that you're not allowed to argue in a public forum without being attacked clearly has something else going on
I've been told at least 4 times in my lifetime that we have 12 years before we're extinct. In the 70's we were supposed to be on the verge of a new ice age. Now we are alternately cooking or freezing depending on the weather holocaust of the week. Actually, it appears to be morphing into, "the weather itself will kill us all," as opposed to any particular temperature gradient. We're still here.
Also I'm pretty fucking sure we were supposed to run out of gas right around now. Fuck happened to that? Oh they found out we have a lot more gas lmfao
@@fuckjewtube69 lmao
Lmao
@@fuckjewtube69 Yes and when the California Governor gets his way by pushing his EV agenda there will be a lot more Gas available,Lol.
Um I doubt that, especially since you're not sure exactly how many times you've supposedly been told that. Another dude clinging to what he believes the "strong men" of industry want to hear because he's afraid he'll be fired. Exxon was at the forefront of climate change research, they're the ones who discovered that it is happening and how, then they got busy burying the findings for decades. Do your research and don't buy any property in Florida unless kayaking across your house is for you.
This guy is a GREAT teacher. We really need more like him.
I fully agree with you 💯💯💯
Shame he does not understand how science works.
*sniffle sniffle*
preacher*
@Jim Leask you don't have to be a scientist. High school education science covers this. Physics of light ( he clearly missed this in high school ) chemistry of gasses ( he wasn't paying attention ) statistical analysis ( you need this even in business course in high school) On the latter he has problems in this and virus video. Use of statistical fallacies galore.
Excellent job. You distilled a complex subject down to an 18 minute presentation that was entertaining and concise. Thank you.
*RE: "Excellent job. You distilled a complex subject down to an 18 minute presentation that was entertaining and concise. Thank you."*
......Almost as good as a Roadrunner cartoon. Equally concise and entertaining.
When I was growing up in the 70’s we were told that an ice age was going to happen by 2000.
Restrictions & control.
The clip of the ice melting in Alaska was filmed in the summer, and that happens every summer but it's frozen up again every winter
Omg load of funny shit over 9 years. This fruitcake is saying? 😆😆😆
THE PERMAFROST IS MELTING IN RUSSAI AND ALASKA, CLIMATE CHANGE IS REAL AND IS HERE WITH A VENGANCE
Most glaciers are receding and have been since recorded history. The glaciers where I live in Juneau have receded noticeably in my lifetime but I can easily see evidence of their presence on land 10,000 yrs ago. Climate change is not a new phenomena.
@@cooganalaska3249 NO, BUT BEFORE HUMANS IT WAS A DIFFEERENT STORY, NOW EVER SINCE THE INDUSTRIAL AGE STARTED HUMANS ARE THE CANARY IN THE COAL MINE, AND NOW ARE CAUSING THE EXCESS HEAT, STORMS, FLOODS, HURRICANS AND TYPHONES THAT ARE ALL STRONGER NOW THEN BEFORE,
I like it; 'Bro science'
You should also point out the trees and rainforest are healthier than ever. We plant more than we cut its a renewable, they make what we need oxygen and we make what they need, also we always here about running out of water, we have the same amount as we had a million years ago. It stays here.
We're running out of water lakes and rivers drying up or being drained to product our beverages, which in your body or say vehicle if you let the water run low your body or vehicle runs hotter which damages your brain or in a vehicle damages your engine.
This is a great podcast with heaps of useful info! Thanks again!
Young Student's are being taught "What to Think" rather than "How to think"...so you can see where the future is going..!
Whose students? Not mine
If that is true, it is no different than previous generations. Why do you think racism, poverty, and neoliberalism has lasted for such a long time? The world is getting more and more polluted and you seem to try to ignore that this is a result from the previous generations
I agree
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but how it thinks”
Something like that
(Christopher Hitchens)
the problem is that they don't teach you logic and true open mindedness in school. Logic used to be a requirement with the first universities that Muslims created, and I believe it was also continued in the Christian universities that followed. They both studied Greek philosophy in depth and understood that all discussion had to be based on a rational basis. If there's no one to understand logical communication and there is no demand for us to communicate in the language of logic, then anyone can say anything and you wouldn't know the weaknesses in their arguments and you wouldn't know how to question that person to arrive at the truth. Then everything becomes about emotion like we see today - emotion + superficial logic
This is indeed a huge problem, perhaps the biggest one we will face. Critical thinking as is sjown in this video isn't bring taught in schools and universities.
I would carefully monitor your metrics after this video if I were you. I have a feeling TH-cam’s algorithm wont like this.
John that’s the only certain thing 🙄
If I were you John, I would watch Dane Wigington…..as you appear to be clueless about this matter as well.
Why wouldn't youtube like it? This whole piece as spun as being neutral but in reality it supports the hypothesis that man made climate change is real and its bad. He doesn't mention that 20 times more people are killed by cold than by heat . he claims scientists that say climate change is fake are bought off while the others are "Honest" he lies about ice in Antarctica is receding while the truth is its increasing. The lies permeate threw this whole piece.Its clearly bias.
Encouraging critical thought is against Googles Terms of Service.
The channel deletions will continue until all channels conform.
he is a man of honour so he will definitely willingly "sacrifice" some of his metrics for the search of truth..
his idea was so briliant tho, gather the 2 side, talk for 3 hours minimal, show both side best arguments, and then we decide, to be neutral or leaning to one side 👍👍👍
This dude reminds me of the sniper character in the movie 'Behind Enemy Lines'. Even the sweater he's wearing! 😂
I so want this debate soooo badly. I really want it to be run properly too.
Jordan peterson was right when he said we're not even capable of having a sensible discussion about this kind of stuff
This is probably the single strongest indicator that something dishonest is going on.
@@ryanm7263
True
Jordan Peterson also believes the only TRUTH that exists is that which benefits HUMANITY.
@J P AGW is by definition not a natural process.
Rate of change is the problem. AGW effects this rate of change. GW on its own is not a problem. Ice cores indicate these processes occurring over 100,000's of years. It previously took 20,000 years to see 100ppm increase in CO2. Recently, its taken 50 years of industrial revolution. Go figure.
If the Sopranos ever opened a school the teachers would all look like this.
Yeah, machinegun-teaching LOL
Lol
The first question is the earth warming.? The second question is how much? The third question is there an optimal healthy level of the global temperature? The third question is whether there an increase in inclemency with a rise in temperature? The fourth question is how much is human caused, which determines how much conservation can modulate climate change. Let's get to the brass tacks, if we are forced to conserve forget about air conditioning and personal transportation.
6:23 Thank you. I couldn’t properly fathom that distance until you put it into km.
Regardless of what side a person takes, we NEED to clean up our act. This planet is a beautiful gift.
The problem is, when a solution is met a big name company either buys out the owner and discards the idea or threatens the owner into burying the idea.
If not for big companies the government itself more than likely has a plethora of solutions to different problems, but due to outside influences are keeping quite about it.
The people may want change, but can we really say the same for those in charge?
@Pouty MacPotatohead
No, not yet. The truck are still some time away. The weight plus distance makes the batteries very very heavy, making payload small.
I disagree it’s more like a nightmare. This world is filled with organisms eating each other, and chocked full of deadly natural conditions from ice ages, earth quakes, Tsunamis, floods, disease epidemics, etc. In spite of all this conflict and pain we have managed at great sacrifice to impose a small measure of order and stability with technology and determination.
The idea that our CO2 emissions are a big problem is a big fat lie. There are 100 more pressing issues and most of them are due to natural forces we don’t have much control over.
I like a clean act as much as the next person. But it wasn’t too long ago that the developed countries has institutionalized slavery, genocide and nasty sanitation problems plus a long list of disgusting habits.
I say wait another 20 years to watch the IPCC predictions fail like they have for the last 20.
@Pouty MacPotatohead
I see. But wouldnt weight requirement laws probably be based off infrastructure limitations. Thousands of old bridges, ramps, culverts, road matterials? For the sake of arguing lol.
Gift from who or from where?
"Ocean levels are rising"
"In other news, huge sky-scraper to be built in Miami Beach, investments top half a billion dollars."
Al Gore bought a Beach Mansion in Florida although he warned the public of rising sea levels in his movie An Inconvenient Truth.
@@Simon-pb9cs You think a multi-millionaire can't do on the scale of one mansion what the Netherlands have done on the scale of a country? Also he might have been hoping that humanity would listen to him and not sink his house
@@iwersonsch5131 Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha dont have children and please give back the drivers license you found in the Cornflakes package!!!
@@Simon-pb9cs That's because the rise is tiny at the moment. If the Greenland Ice sheet goes though then get ready for a 7m sea level rise and mass migration.
we are supposed to be underwater right now, the issue with the scientific predictor methods Gore went off is the massive difference in variability as more time passes. also the evaporation of water due to increased temp. .... Gore did more damage to the cause of global warming with his fear mongering than good
I f****** love valuetainment. Keep doing what you doing. In a world with a lot of censorship and propaganda it's great to hear the truth on valuetainment. I don't watch it very often but when I do I know I'm getting the truth and not a bunch of manipulation or censorship. Thank you Patrick bet-david. I feel like this is like me in the most important ways.
O.k. i might be missing something but is the atmosphere is getting thicker keeping the suns heat from leaving the earth then would it not keep the sun rays from coming in and making it hotter?
Great question. And I'm sorry that in 7 months I'm the only one who has replied. Hopefully someone smarter will come along and give you a better answer, but for now I'll take a stab at it. So, the sun emits radiant heat, which the ozone controls how much enters the atmosphere. The co2 acts as a multiplier, not heat itself. So, as the name implies, think of it as a green house. I know that's not a great explanation, but I hope it helps. 🤗
that was a very good video, and getting experts from both sides o the argument to state their case in a boardroom on camera is exactly what is needed with this topic lets hear both sides of the argument
fuck that, what do YOU think?
and you still voting for Oil and Gas funded politicians? THAT is what will decide the fate of nations.
My prof has a really good take that I’ve adopted as well. He states that he doesn’t believe in climate change, rather climate volatility. Are temps changing? Yes, they always have, and we’ve been hot before such as in the medieval ages, and cold in various ice ages, and this was before we had a large scale impact. The other point is that the earth has numerous negative feedback loops that prevent large change, such as clouds cooling the earth back down. In regards to greenhouse gases we have cycles for those just as there is a water cycle. Nitrogen, CO2, etc, all have cycles that naturally occur. Volatility occurs in any large scale “system”, and the earth is no exception, rather a miracle.
Yes I too wonder how much longer our luck may hold....or not.
That all true!
The only difference with medieval ages is that we have gasoline cars and plastic since 200 years.
That's speeding up the process.
Without that nature would fix itself again.
I agree. However, we could certainly manage our resources better to maintain a better balance and leave less of an net negative impact on the Earth. We take and take without replenishing adequately.
Oh, did you “pick” (find) something that appeased your lizard brain? That’s a good little lemming...
Yeah that's all fine until you throw humans in the mix...which accelerate what your professor calls climate "volatility" which is kind of a misnomer because climate changes extremely slowly. Weather is volatile.
This quote resonates in this debate...
“Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.”
-Voltaire
Ummm... That could be applied to flat eathers prespective as well.
The evidence is pretty certain that climate change is NOT what they (media, leftwing politicians, climate activists) say. Check our comment above for some REAL perspective.
Vinny Holiday didn’t mean to put a stake in the ground. I practice the scientific method day in and day out. If I’ve learned one thing, it’s that the truth, the real truth, is an elusive beast that you always think you have in your crosshairs, but always escapes leaving you with something less. What you are left with is still a useful nugget which describes incredibly well what you are studying, but it’s still falls short of the pure truth.
All I’m saying is that if the history of humans practicing the scientific method has thought us anything, it’s that it can’t provide us with certainty. Anthropogenic global warming may be the truth, but we should always question that truth and never be afraid to do so.
Vinny Holiday
I'm told that atmospheric carbon only "traps" heat for about one third of a second before releasing it in various directions. Does Co2 behave differently?
@@pokerwiz101 Interestingly, no culture has thought the world was flat - Bertrand Russell made it up - on a seemingly solid basis. Just an interesting note.
I keep hearing, "We'll all be dead in ten years!!!!" then eleven years later, "It's much worse than we thought!!!"
All about money more money for the elite who call us fools
Al Gore: The shorelines are gonna be disappearing!!
Also Al Gore: *Buys Oceanfront Property*
Don
Hahaha
Don even Obama bought oceanfront property not too long ago
BDom
Don't forget bathhouse Marco Rubio
Rafael Pola
He has a house in Qatar
Danibolical 1
Grumpy Greta
Coming from a Natural Resources Management major and teacher, you did an amazing and clear mini course here. Lots of ❤️ and blessings being sent your way.
I will never trust PBD on climate change until he interviews Randall Carlson
In the 70s, some scientists were warning that evidence was pointing toward an upcoming ice age.
But just believe scientists.
Amazing, just amazing. This is such a healthy way to consume information. You give me the respect to let me make my own decisions.
Yes, I agree bet-david is very cool and professional.
He got a few things wrong though. 1) Northern Irish government didn't collapse because of one scandal. You'd need to only understand how politics works there to understand what happened. In relation to the scandal, the issue was the lack of proper oversight. 2) He said there's no way of measuring how much of the carbon in the air is because of man. That's completely wrong. The carbon emitted from burning organic matter (eg fossil fuels) is different from carbon emitted in any other way. Scientists know exactly how much is becuase of man.
He left out so much information and reduced it to talking points. Go to Potholer54's channel here on TH-cam if you want a comprehensive explanation on the science.
@@jarletto Interesting, at the end he explained this is a challenge for a debate he is going to host.
More like he completely misrepresents the scientific consensus as if it's 50/50 and then says "make your own decisions" after poisoning the well for 20 minutes.
Human-based greenhouse gases cause global warming: www.climatelevels.org
"Greenhouse gas emissions from human activities are the only factors that can account for the observed warming over the last century; there are no credible alternative human or natural explanations supported by the observational evidence." nca2018.globalchange.gov/chapter/2/#fig-2-1
The total CO2 released from coal, oil & gas over the last 30 years, is greater than the rest of all human history.
ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co2-emissions-region?stackMode=absolute
It is so nice to see someone that's searching for the truth, good luck and I'm looking forward to watching it if you get the people together to do it
me personally, I don’t understand why is he even explaining the green house effect, all general aspects of atmosphere, physics etc. don’t people have to know that already? I really liked to hear different explanations and maybe some more advanced science he got into, but seriously other people don’t who don’t know what the green house effect or people who don’t know what the atmosphere is? people don’t know all those basics that they were supposed to learn in school? If not well here is your reason why this country is going on the way the hard bottom. absolute ignorance.
Another consideration is our current civilization only thrived in a small temperature band. This band will eventually change even we don’t force the change. So we need to also consider this. In the long run, will we have to artificially moderate our climate to keep it within a band? To me we are contributing to the greenhouse warming effect and this is risky; however, even a little ice age is also risky.
What happened with this invite mate at the end of your video? Did you make that video debate?
Awesome, unbiased, common sense outlook on this increasingly important topic! I completely agree with your idea of a 3- hour debate. We’re you ever able to make it happen? Would love to watch it! Thanks again, good stuff!!
The climate alarmist won’t debate because the science is settled, that should tel you something.
I came out of this video convinced we have never been on the moon. If those moon Temps are for real. I gotta look into that.
@@Bobswartz It's 'Soyance'.
it is not increasingly anything lol 50 years ago they said the same thing as this guy florida will be under water lol
The 'Eco-Terrorist'..Left Fears the 'Truth'...will Never Even Debate it...Says its Settled Science...Total..B.S...!!!
All I know is that the subject of climate change is a massive money maker for lot of people
For example...?
Can you back up hollow statements like this?
Al Gore, Bill Nye the government aka "the carbon tax". Billions are being generated for something that may or may not be an issue
The oil industry is a bigger money maker.
@@ericselectrons that may be but we also know oil is 100% real. We can't say the same for climate change. Tell me in the year 2089 if it's real or not
Very happy to hear an honest debate. Did this ever happen?
3 years after the fact: what do you think.
It won't happen as these climate alarmists are not good enough at debating live, having to spin untruths, & manipulated data, to appear credible.
It's the same reason no, so-called historical experts will ever debate Graham Hancock, on a pre-diluvian Human advanced culture; he would destroy their credibility, by debunking their apparent truths. Far easier to call him a racist, even though he is married to a dark skinned woman, & has mixed race children.
Same with Dr. Peter McCullough debating Anthony Fauci, on the Covid fluff.
An increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere also increases vegetation on the earth, as plants need carbon dioxide for photosynthesis and the plants excrete oxygen.
Pollution is are biggest issue. The earth will always be here, with or without mankind.
yup, but the mankind part pretty important if you're a man.
*our biggest issue. 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
eventually even the earth will be consumed by something.
There are two other factors that you did not discuss that contribute to the fluctuations of earth's climate. One is water vapor. Check the percentage of water vapor in the air, which also traps heat. And the second is solar flares and sunspots. These phenomena are cyclical and affect the amount of heat we get from year to year.
You should also mention the fact that Earth's magnetic field has been weakening, since about 1859, when the Carrington event occurred. This is cyclical, which occurs about every 12000 years. This allows the solar plasma, & non-visible radiation to penetrate further into our atmosphere. This is evident from the ground-up lightening, as well as aurora being visible, from far lower latitudes, than has occurred, in our lifetime.
The scientists say that clouds are a major factor in the temp.
@@garyrodriguez8414clouds are a major factor in temperature but not much in climate change.
@@mthunzimapatwanathe climate is always changing as evident with the Greenland ice cores.
The Roman and mid evil warm periods were warmer than today plus the climatic optimum.
There have also been points in the past where CO2 was 10 times the current amount at 4000ppm and the earth was entering an ice age.
CO2 is a trace gas making up only 0.0004% of our atmosphere and is basically plant food.
China and India combined emit around 75% of all co2 emissions so if everyone else stopped completely, CO2 concentration would continue to rise.
Sea levels were rising and glaciers melting with temps rising a full 40 years before the industrial revolution and haven't deviated from that trend at all.
They don't know crap about the future of the earths climate and can't even explain the past like how was a polar ice sheet all the way down over Cincinnati Ohio while Islands 400 miles from the north pole were lush and green and supported a massive megafauna populations.
Those same islands can't have Vegetation today as they are in total darkness 6 months of the year.
It's all a sham.
@@citizengkar7824I personally don't think the magnetic field records are accurate. We see clear reversals on enormous timescales but what happens in between?!
The earths crust is what moves, not the magnetic pole.
The earth takes care of itself. That’s the way it was designed.
When North America was covered in ice up to 3000 ft thick, the world average temperature was only about 5 to 9C less than it is now. It doesn't take much of a temperature change to have a large effect on the earth's climate.
6:26 « for some of you guys in Europe »
Canada: Am I a joke to you?
Yeah, that was an odd remark. Love to David from metric NZ - one of apparently 192 countries that use the metric system. The countries that use imperial: The U.S., Myanmar and Liberia, lol.
Man thank you so much for putting this video out. Why can’t others just be this honest! Pat this is amazing!
The weather is weaponized
Climate change is caused because of evil. All of creation is crying out to be delivered from all the evil that has taken over the world. The blood of aborted babies are crying out. Gender confusion being taught to the young generation . Every kind of evil & debasement is taking place. The people have chosen evil instead of good.
It's like telling ghost stories around the campfire. Fear and control is the game.
I wish more people would look at both sides of every issue as you have presented this.
WELL, EITHER YOU BELIEVE IN SCIENCE AND DATA, OR YOU DON'T, HOT AIR HOLDS MORE MOISTURE THAN COLD AIR, AS A TESTAMENT TO THAT AND PROOF, JUST LOOK AT CALIFORNIA RIGHT NOW, LOTS OF RAIN WHEN IT DUMPS, ALL A SIGN OF THE EARTH HEATING UP AND THIS WILL GET WORSE CLIMTE CHANGE IS NO LONGER DEBATABLE, ITS HERE IN FULL FORCE
It's a complete fraud, it's a fact that man made climate change doesn't exist and never existed
@@ethanshelbyskateboarding9980 YES, THAT IS WHY IT IS NOW BREAKING HEAT RECORDS IN ALL THE SOUTHEAST AND FLORIDA NOW AT 90 DEGREES TWO MONTHS AHEAD OF TIME FOR FEB. AND MORE COMIMING, MASSIVE FLOODS NOW IN BRAZIL, MANY PEOPLE DEAD, HMMMM, WARM AIR HOLDS MORE MOISTURE THEN COLD AIR, H MMMMMM DO YOU WOUNDER IF THERE IS A CONNECTION
@@domcizek irrelevant man made climate change is a HOAX
@@ethanshelbyskateboarding9980 KEEP RIDING YOUR SKATEBOARD, AND IN THE FUTURE IT WILL BE A SURFBOARD WITH OCEAN RISE ON THE WAY,
Keep it up Pat ...we love your passion for teaching !✅
Hey Pat! You gotta tell the "whole truth' ABOUT RAYMOND! While he was CEO of Exxon he spearheaded the merger w/MOBIL and the two Cos. turned out to be way more valuable then each separately, so he unlocked a lotta hidden value >THAT'S why he was given the huge farewell pkg!!! Come on Pat! You gotta be more honest than the JewsMedia!!!
Why does he show a nuclear reactor and say fossil fuels. Lol. Nuclear is no carbon.
Nomadic Fanatic stickers maybe because the green fascists are against nuclear power as well. You are right though.
Maybe areas with fault lines and storms with names shouldn’t have nuclear reactors.
@@MrBrendanabc and with low quality security and control standarts and threats of tsunamis and earthquakes simultaneously. by today's technology, you actually have to TRY to mess it up, in order to repeat fukushima.
it looks to be emitting a lot, even though its all water vapor
Running full steam. Everybody’s charging their cars. Lol
It’s not a conversation it’s done, we can see it happening in real time. The debate was finished 10 years ago. The people left squeaking about hoaxes and solar flares are irrelevant, the grown ups are getting on wit it.
Even the Pentagon knows the Earth is warming. It’s settled science.
I love the way you simply nail down the facts on both sides, and then come up with the right questions. Absolutely, it's a question of the % of damage/no damage from natural cycles or manmade. Thank you for yet another video of facts, and the admonition to now go out and study it for yourself!
You know you're doing something right when the TH-cam Commisars put a disclaimer on your video.
Best truth Ive heard for a while! Thanks for being enlighted!!
John Harvey It’s on literally any topic that’s political now. It’s because there’s such an insane amount of misinformation on the platform now.
@@ballbag9641 Not at all the reason. Its because theres a lot of mythbusters and truth speakers. And those are the ones being shut down. It is not politically correct to give a correct explanation of the climate and other sensitive topics.
James last You’re the prime example of why these disclaimers are needed. You’ve fallen hook line and sinker into the youtube truthseeker delusions.
@@ballbag9641 And you are the prime example why parents shouldnt give ipads to their toddlers
You are doing humanity right! Bless you!🇺🇸👍❤️
The correlation of higher co2 levels and higher tempretures does mean that the higher co2 is causing higher temps. In science, correlation does not always equal causation. Politicians are not scientists.
The ability to assess both sides is the first step.
You are one of the few people I know who really cares about facts, truth and intellectual honesty. Thank you Patrick (from Angola, Africa). All the best .
We DO have a major trash and waste problem going on. Everything needs to be recyclable or bio degradable. IF each people only generated 1 gallon of trash per week, times that by 7 billion people times 52 weeks per year, times x amount of years
Did anything happen with your request for this meeting?
I totally agree with you, especially with your final questions about exact percentages. Thanks for your content Pat. In Germany you are not able to discuss this topic, they instantly call you a climate change denier,allthough you just ask some skeptical questions.
Wilhelm G lmao poor Germany you guys are reeeaallllyyy paying for being a country that had balls.
Yeah. Did you hear that the biggest German psychology institution is suggesting to treat climate change deniers?
That reminds me of something we discussed in history class that happened like 80 years ago
Hi Wilhelm! Percentages could be misleading. Human carbon emissions are so minimal compared to the natural carbon cycle, yet these minimal values are enough to inbalance earths system
HiFisch94 yep
Paco Rutten I heard about that, but do you Really think the earth would be so unstable?
Thanks for being a grownup. It is Sooo refreshing to see someone who is not just hooked like a fish by other people's agendas. I don't think that anyone wants to destroy our planet but let's just get to the truth of it all and find out honestly how much time we have to make a meaningful plan that makes since and is free of bickering politics.
WELL, THE PLAN IS ALREADY IN MOTION, SOLAR, WIND, NUCLEAR, AND HYDROGEN IS NOW FRONT AND CENTER, AND SOON ALL GAS STOVES WILL NOT BE SOLD ALSO, TO MUCH CO2 AND METHANE GOING UP INTO THE AIR
LMFAO. This is the agenda. 99% of climate scientists agree. This is kind of a big deal. No one is saying we only have 12 years left to live, despite this moron, but if we don't act now, then there will be a point where we will not be able to stop it, per the SCIENTISTS WHO STUDY THIS.
@@employee0 YES, THE MELTING PERMAFROST IN SIBERIA CREATING MASSIVE BLOWOUT CRATERS IS ENOUGH FOR ME TO BELIEVE IT IS GETTING WARMER, AND METHANE IS 25 MORE DEADLY THEN CO2
Oil companies knew that climate change was real and caused by our greenhouse gas emissions in 1977. Then what happened ? They instilled a slight doubt in people minds. They didn't need more to slow down the transition.
And 46 years later, here we are. With incompetent people making videos on a topic out off their area of expertise, because they didn't understand that the time for debate is gone. It doesn't really matter if IPCC exaggerates a little or underestimates the problem. These are projections, by definition not accurate.
Look at what is happening in Spain, South of France, Greece. It's happening.
The house is burning, said president Chirac in 2002. Stop finding excuses.
So when do we see this debate on PBD Podcast
Was there a video you did with top scientists?
This guy is great. Just discovered him. His most important message is about looking at all sides of an issue!!
I give you 1 more to think. If we are not sure what we are doing the most vise thing is stop what we are doing.
Actually we are experimenting with our children future!
The both sides approach is dangerous. One of them is true and one of them is false. If you asked me how are babies made and I told you it was storks brought them to the mothers and then you ask someone else and they say it's through sex one of us is wrong and one of us is right. Should we consider history from the Viewpoint of nazis? The s*** we consider what child molesters think about how they should be allowed to interact with children? In any given situation there is only one objective truth and sooner we can all come to that truth and start working on the problem the better
Great teaching, the GW alarmist won’t talk about the fact that even though we have exponentially increased fossil fuel use globally, yet global warming has only increased 1 degree, as you mentioned. There are deserts 🌵 that have actually turned green by absorbing carbon dioxide. I think we need to clean our environments rationally, slowly. The sky isn’t falling, God will provide for what he created. God bless you all.
Makes sense
We just need to deal with pollution then it will look after itself.
We don't need another trading scheme like carbon credits just more bs
Exactly and if you know anything about the bible and God you should know that he's coming back soon and the last thing that we should worry about is climate change!!!
Right now every bible on earth has been supernaturally changed and I believe it's a huge end times sign!!!
Amos 8 11 says that there will be a famine not for food or water but for God's word and we are in that famine right now!
Check out the site, Truth Shock TV on youtube and see how badly the bible has been corrupted!!!
Also Jesus said that not one generation would pass and Israel is 74 years old so by strength a generation is 80 years and that means 6 years left!!!
The bible has never been wrong not once until recently with these changes and humanity better take notice and start watching for his return!!!
God bless!!!
Agreed
When they said go green, they meant Soylent Green
Patrick, I absolutely love this video and I agree with you on getting the story from both sides or even from those who are on both sides. I would recommend two people... Michael Reynolds from Earthship Biotechture because whether you believe in it or not, his housing is a miraculous thing you should all see. And the 2nd being Randall Carlson .
One of my favourite podcasts was the debate Joe Rogan hosted between Graham Hancock and Michael Shermer. Of course their topic was slightly more interesting but kudos all the same!
Not a single pro climate scientist will accept that challenge. It's been offered and declined every time.
What challenge? The percentage of climate change caused by man is easily determined by looking at the historic (800,000 years) increases in carbon concentrations found in ice samples, versus what we have seen over the past 170 years (since the start of the 2nd industrial revolution). We have done in 170 years (primarily 50 years) what has historically taken thousands of years. Bottom line, look at any 170 year period starting 800,000 years ago up until 1830 and compare to the past 170 years. You will likely find that man is responsible for 90% (or more) of the increased carbon...i.e. global warming.
I love this guy. I hope he gets this debate going.
Nate_The_Mechanic people are we too dumb to debate this, sadly
"People are we too dumb..."
@@derekmarks8969 ?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
These debates have happened many times, every debate I have watched in the 10 years was won by the real scientists. The ones that have made different facets of the climate their lifes work. Richard Lindzen, Nills Axel Morner, William Happer, Patrick Michaels, Patrick Moore, Tim Ball the list is so much longer and none of these guys get paid to do these debates, none areonany oil companies payroll.
In the last few years historians have gotten on board , ( Tony Heller & John Robson)they are debunking so many of the IPCC’s misinformation statements and showing in their videos where the written word from the past has proven that the climate hostory is being changed to suit the IPCC narritive. The Polar Bear extinction story is a lie, The death of the Great Barrier Reef is a lie (Dr. Peter Ridd Austrailia)
Take a few minutes , google how CO2 at 600 to 800 ppm improves the plant life in greenhouses, it makes the vegetables larger, more succulent and they resist disease much better..
We are Carbon based creatures, everything on the planet that has LIFE is the result of CO2, cut the CO2 as John Kerry says (0 ppm)
Is what infact will cause all life on this planet to cease to exist.
@@floroy9265 that is all lies...
Patrick seems like a pretty good guy and also fair. The scientists who don’t go along with the man-made global warming/climate change narrative are largely censored and demonized by the Left. It’s as if you don’t accept the extremist ideology of the Left, you’re a “denier” or an “infidel” for not believing in their religion of man-made climate change. Even when you mention the names of the top scientists and climate experts who have data that supports their position, it’s just automatically ignored or discounted. While there might be some elements of truth in both camps, it’s important to know what so-called evidence is fabricated or is intentionally misleading.
The science was settled in 1890, and developed further over the last 130 years.
I have seen articles today saying that Venice canals are dry now. So, which is it ice caps melting and flooding everywhere or severe drought and ocean levels are dropping?
Well done video. I agree, we need actual debate on this topic. I'm in the camp that thinks this is all about control and has nothing to do with the climate. That said, I am open and interested in listening to a real debate from both sides, but I fear that will never happen.
It's the biggest scam ever put on humans. It use to be acid rain, hole in the ozone layer, etc.
I really appreciate this presentation. it's well argued and honest.
No one is denies climate change...The climate has been changing since the beginning of time!
Hi Pat, Did you ever get the scientists on both sides together? That is definetely the way forward and I would love to see that!
Hi Saskia. If this were 1950, there might be significant climate scientists doubting human-caused dangerous climate change, but in 2023 almost no legitimate climate expert would consider such a point of view. The forces arguing "hoax" are much like the cigarette makers in my youth saying cigarettes were good for you.
@@dfgriggsI wouldn't be so certain. I've met a climate data analyst that worked for NASA that didn't believe that the data pointed towards man made climate change. I've heard of one other "thru the grapevine" admittedly, but they are out there.
@@knarfweasel Hi, Phillip. I said "almost' -- I'm sure there must be some out there. Can you give us a pointer to these folks so we can take a look at their credentials and publications?
@@dfgriggs I am unsure if these particular individuals had any published works, and don't feel great about posting their names online without asking them. I understand that doesn't inspire confidence in an online discussion, but I wanted to share their thoughts, even if only anecdotally. One of them worked on an instrument that was installed on weather satellites. The other I'm not as sure what they did, besides "working for NASA" admittedly. As previously mentioned the other was a 2nd hand source.
Thank you so much for educating the public. You are able to explain everything so everyday people can understand all without sounding arrogant. Peace be with you!!
The Earth was warming from 1890 to 1940 and then it started cooling from 1940 to 1973 (remember how all the scientists were saying we are entering into a new ice age ) and it warmed again until 2012 and now it is starting to cool again.
That's why the climate alarmists changed the name of their movement from Global Warming to Climate Change, because they can never be wrong as the climate changes cyclically all the time.
Seems like it is fine tuning....or maybe our creator is doing so.
A negative feedback loop
That’s why they changed their language to climate change from global warming and or global cooling
I think one of the main points is if you're believing any words out of any politician's mouth about the weather or anything else for that matter, there's something wrong with you. Your parents and teachers have failed you. I thought it was common knowledge to never trust a politician. Especially when you have years of video evidence of every single thing they say is a lie.
A big problem is that any dissenting scientific literature opposing climate change is often banned, ridiculed, and not spoken off. Also, many scientists are afraid of opposing it as they will be ridiculed and canceled. Any opposition to climate change is often silenced.
The great thing about peer review, is it exposes bought scientists being called out by honest competitors, which there is no lack of. Buying a scientist only gets the buyer errors and biases, which do not get published in peer reviews. And on the rare occasion that BS gets published, rivals and competitors pounce.
Government grants, the UN, and other funding have no effect on atmospheric physics. Two much fierce competition to pull off lying about the physical sciences. Plus no one in main stream science wants the findings from science to be “correct” so to speak because any researcher who could bust two hundred years of climate research would be unstoppable. Hundreds of thousands of real scientists thrive on refuting a hypothesis and busting scientific theories and can't be "silenced" nor are afraid to try to bust the principle findings of climate science, as they know the would be the biggest name since Einstein and rich to boot if they could.
Those "dissenting" peer reviews on climate change or are ridiculed for it are usually washouts that couldn't cut in in applied physics. Even the fossil fuel lobby knows this and this is why movements like the CCCM exists to employ PR flacks and advertising professionals, pollsters, lobbyists, and a few retirees from science who disagree with some aspect of conventional climate science in order to to undermine public confidence in science.
If the climate stopped changing I'd be scared.
I like your presentation Pat, but as you know, the earth has had fluctuating climate for all of it's existence ..... 4-1/2 billion years. I know you are familiar with the reasons for climate change in the past Billions of years, but maybe your audience is not, so here we go. The Earth's climate is governed by four items; Solar radiation, Axial tilt, Axial precession and Earth's Orbital changes from circular to eclipse, the latter three being called the Milankovitch Cycles. Axial Tilt has had the greatest influence on the Earth's climate, with a tilt that ranges from 22.1 to 24.5 degrees from the Ecliptic Plain, called the Obliquity of the Ecliptic. In fact it is this Obliquity change that has been the primary cause of the last 26 ice ages during the last 2.6 million years. We are presently in an Interglacial Minimum, between Ice Ages, where the Earth's temperature is unusually warm. We will soon enter another Ice Age. I agree that man is contributing to the present warming cycle, but It is such a small contribution that it is probably not measurable. Other elements that contribute 5-10 times more than CO2 are Methane, Water Vapor and Dust that are circulating in the Earth's atmosphere and are never mentioned as contributors to climate change. When we discuss "Climate Change", we need to put more science into it, instead of treating it as a Religion or as a discussion of more people believe this or more people believe that. Science is not a democracy, it is a method of analyzing facts. Thank you again for your great review.
No
90% spot on. Note IPCC 6 also include particle forcing impacts from the sun into the earths climate. None of the current models that use IPCC 6 include any modeling of the effects of particle forcing from solar wind or magnetic coupling. Interesting that numerous scientific papers in peer reviewed publications over decades of research highlight the mechanisms yet few discuss the impacts or accounting in computer modeling.
How about we all quit acting like we know WTF has been going on "the past billions of years", and continue doing what works until a better alternative presents itself.
@@vincentratliff9419 Right, I’m amazed by the sheer mass of climate scientists in the comment section.
th-cam.com/video/CA1zUW4uOSw/w-d-xo.html
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
Please help people know facts
This is how news SHOULD be... both sides and YOU decide...well done Patrick, blessings brother.
This gives the illusion that climate change is up for debate....
@@gypsylips1950 Exactly, the reason it's taking so long to combat climate change is because idiots are still debating it. I love Pat, but he always tries to be too neutral, unbiased is one thing, but when you pretend both sides are valid with everything it's fucking stupid.
Science is never fully settled. Just read a science text book from a 100 years ago. Do you think the science books we have today are fool proof 100 years from now? I'm not saying the evidence isnt conclusive for climate change... I'm just saying anyone who says dont bother showing two sides is closed minded....and closed minded people are people who can never truly learn
@@bc6893 The problem is, we've been having this debate for decades. It's enough, EXON has known about it since the 50s. We can't perpetually argue while our planet is literally burning. You think Elon is giving his patents away for no reason? This bullshit debate is the reason we haven't already solved this problem.
@@stormsurge1850 actually it's the day that those who bring such attention to the matter ACTUALLY practice what they preach... when Bernie and al Gore and all these other hypocrites actually live out what they say (sell all your mansions, fancy cars, etc) then maybe will see change...
Patrick this sounds like a great idea. Yes, get them all together. Let's see a debate about this.
Earth has been heating up since the last ice age. In fact between 1690 and 1730 (before the industrial revolution), the earth heated up more than in the last 50 years..
In the UK we use half the amount of oil today than we did in the 70s.
Despite this it is good to conserve resources and be green simply for good quality air.
I like that you show both sides. Too many people only look at one side and consider people who think otherwise are idiots.
JonnyBeoulve
And that's what is wrong with today's society
Nobody knows how to agree to disagree
Danibolical 1
And he made a lot of money selling his cable TV network to Al Jazeera
I disagree one side is clearly right, truth doesn't have multiple perspectives - 2+2=4 u know
sayit1196
The side that Is right is the side that disagrees that the world will end in 12 years
I look forward, Pat, to seeing this great panel of scientists on both sides to settle this issue. Thank you and love your videos!
Great video, well presented and articulated. Personally i've researched this topic quite heavily over the past 25 years, and what i've learnt is; There is so much misinformation, not only on this topic but its at an unhealthy level for anyone wanting to understand it. Too many have a closed-minded view on this and therefor its sometimes hard to have a conversation about it. The attack on peoples anxiety by constantly throwing doomsday threats in the media is not healthy, for or against any arguement, and with age we grow tired of it and stop believing anything they say. Lastly, from everything I have learnt to date worst case scenario humans are contributing to about 1% (this is not proven, just based on most of the information we actually know) and best case scenario we are contributing next to nothing (again depends on a lot we dont know). Theres a lot of good things we can do to make this world better, and over time we seem to manage that pretty well for the most part, I am not worried about the future of the climate, our progress will keep up with what we can control.
I would like to add that IF global warming is in fact true and I say a big IF, then our global warming will help alleviate the coming next global cooling event like the little ice age we experienced back in the thirty,
A bit slow out of the blocks here, but I've seen nothing that comes close to how I feel, as this video. Pat, (If you're watching!) Your desire for truth is truely admirable.
Okay wait wait. It’s incredibly important to regard the fact that nobody says there wouldn’t be a climate change without humans. It’s normal for the earths climate to shift from an ice age(in wich we currently are in->frozen poles) to a warmer climate. The problem is not the climate change itself but the fact that irresponsible use of fossil fuel etc. is accelerating this change in a really dangerous way. And it shouldn’t be a discussion if it’s real or not because there is a scientific consensus that climate change IS reality and it doesn’t care if you believe in it or not because you will suffer it’s consequences like everybody else.
thank you for clearing the shroud amongst confused people in a informative manner.
Milan Meyer yeah I don’t buy. Water levels have barely risen since my dad was a kid. He’s told me they’ve been feeding this global warming, climate change shit to people forever. They always say in 12 years, then 12 years comes and the earth is fine. I don’t believe that humans, who don’t even fully understand how the climate of earth works due to so many different complexities, can produce a computer model that can accurately predict the earths climate because i call bullshit. go do some research yourself and not listen to everything the MSM tells you because it’s a fuckin joke. look up tony heller and watch some of his vids and tell me that the climate change alarmists are 100% full proof, bet u can’t
@@mispap1 1. Unless you or your dad is a climate scientist your thoughts and opinions are worth jack shit when it comes to the actual science of sea level change, which you should read by the way: science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/12/
2. "They always say in 12 years, then 12 years comes and the earth is fine" -- the only people who say this are dipshit politicians and those in the media. The science would never predict something so stupid, and it never has. This quote is often misunderstood from an actual report by the IPCC ( www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ ) that says we only have 11 years (as of right now) to seriously change the amount we rely on fossil fuels if we want to try and keep global temperatures from rising above 1.5C
3. "I don’t believe that humans, who don’t even fully understand how the climate of earth works due to so many different complexities, can produce a computer model that can accurately predict the earths climate because i call bullshit." -- Well lucky for us, we don't have to rely on you simply not understanding how it works, we can look at the actual evidence and decide for ourselves. If you have evidence to suggest we've gotten our climate models wrong, I'd love to see it.
( www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/globaltemps_agency_comparison_2018.gif )
4. "go do some research yourself and not listen to everything the MSM tells you" I 100% agree that you shouldn't listen to everything MSM says about science, after all, you still have news channels that want to promote the idea that it isn't even a problem or has nothing to do with humans. You should go look at the actual science instead!
5. "look up tony heller" Tony Heller is completely full of shit when it comes to the science of climate change. I dare you to produce one peer-reviewed scientific research paper that is published in a credible scientific journal that agrees with the dumb shit he spews out.
@J P I responded in your other comment
@@mispap1 I agree. To say "is accelerating this change in a really dangerous way" is something that could not be proven even if it were all true. You would need 2 earths, one with our conditions and one with less carbon dioxide observed over generations. LOL. I think the solar output cycles (surely) and (it seems, possibly) changes in earths magnetic field may have more to do with it. They cannot even say there has been average warming globally in the last decade anyway, hence changing the name to climate change. We have many environmental issues but I doubt 400 parts per million ( 0.04 %) of atmospheric carbon dioxide is amongst the most pressing.
John stossel literally just tried this. The pro climate change activists didn't want to debate. Good luck I'd love to see this.
Stosels a shill
@@rudystraight1750 A shill of whom?
He purposely edits out educated debaters just just The Daily Wire does.
I saw that video too. Love John Stossel.
Stosel's is one of the few real honest journalist left
Being an Eclectic aggregator of information and distilling the information is crucial for a being a free conscious individual
Also, if we accept that there is some amount of natural and man made climate change we don’t know if nature is going colder or warmer on its own. So, hypothetically, nature could have made it 5deg colder in 50 years and man has made it 6 deg warmer netting 1deg warmer.
Pat, your videos are POWERFUL! Grateful to have the chance to learn from you and be inspired by what you do. Thank you!!
Says "Burning of fossil fuels" then shows a clip of a Nuclear power plant...LOL
for those that don't know, that stuff is actually just steam.
I saw that too
nuclear power plants do not use fossil fuels...
The power plant shown at 8:47 is a fossil-fueled plant, as evidenced by the red/white exhaust stacks that a nuclear powered plant does not have. The large cooling towers in the foreground and back ground eject heat to the atmosphere instead of to a lake or other body of water. The white plumes are water vapor from the evaporative cooling that takes place in the towers and are not pollutants/emissions.
raeon ™ - no they don’t use abionic fuel - they are much much more dangerous.
And one town did a study that they painted all of the blacktop white and they saw dramatic temperature decrease in the summertime. Back in the late 1800s in the early 1900s we had nothing but dirt roads now we have more pavement, sidewalks, cement everywhere that holds the heat in and nobody wants to recognize that. I don’t think fossil fuel has anything to do with climate change. I honestly think it has to do with all of the asphalt cement that we’re putting down on dirt has an issue with climate change.