I would play 5 Double Streets, put $20 on 3 Double Streets, and $15 on 2 other Double Streets. The result is the same, but you can divide up the whacks better this way. Also, only add to your bets after every 2nd loss.
Don't you think since you covered 30 numbers, is better to do positive progression, for example, when you win add one set to all your bet until you win $100 ,after that restart again. And if you lose stay with seam bet
Tried this one out. Used waaaaaay smaller bets on a ERG table. 4X on a loss and if I hit the high 19-36 I still made some profit and when hitting one of the double streets it brought me back to the break even. I'd give this one a B+ to an A- and the only reason is it becomes really a boring strategy after a while. Also the player doesn't have to bet 4 units on the 50/50 bet and 1 unit on two double streets. I play 2 units on a 50/50 and one unit on the opposite dozen that has no coverage. I play on ERG tables with .20 units to build up the bankroll then when I progressively increase the unit amounts. On a penny roulette table I've started off with as little as .02 cent units which then gives me the most amount of donks I can absorb if I fall into an unlucky streak.
You have to be lucky no matter what the bet. This type of bet is quite good because your immediate response to losing will return your loss. Most systems you have to play many spins to recover. Maybe good for a couple to play together.
So when you win on second tier your still short of when you first started and have to make everything back? That's all progress lost and still out of pocket
3x Martingale is how to recover when betting 2 dozens or 2 columns. I've calculated in the past that I could make 7 full bets with a 3x Martingale, and I've seen 7+ in a row on the same dozen before. I even devised a Martingale strategy for one dozen or one column with a different progression than doubling when I first started playing roulette, and I lost my bankroll when the column that I was betting on didn't show up for 18 spins. You really just can't tell.
I just don't like betting methods where you put money down only to hedge or break even. So i would use your modification but add $5 to the dozen bet. I would change the martingale to where you have to get whacked 2 times in a row before increasing your bet. I would also add if some numbers becomes hot i would start doing straight up single number bets .
x3 martingale one a single loss is extreme for me especially when your ahead. Like the first loss you were still up 40 bucks. 60 to win 20, sounds like you're better off betting 2 dozens, 60 would get you 30. Yes you get more numbers to loss but you get half the money as a win with no push, here you get 1/3rd. Personally I don't like making beats where I beat risk more to get less.
If you check the comments on that video, I mentioned that they bet on 37 numbers, which is always a Durian from me. I may have a more detailed video on it later, though.
First please only do double zero. Everything is better with single zero and just not typically found near mot people casinos. Also could you start a series on Craps? I'd really like to hear your input on systems there. I really like craps, nothing like the payouts and simplicity. Personally expanding my gaming into other games to shake things up. So doesn't have to be my suggestion but tryout more then just roulette and blackjack. Just an idea, if you don't like those games then I understand.
How come you don't rate the system that makes the most money as a Grapefruit? I just checked out your site and Hopscotch was rated a Grapefruit from you but you lost money? Isn't the purpose of a Grapfruit System - to make money?
I don't think how much you win in a short session is the best indicator of a good system. In such a small sample size, pretty much anything can happen. And the systems that CEG rates have a wild range of buy-in amounts and average bet sizes. It's easy for a trial to make a ton of money if you're betting thousands per spin on Red. And a lot of the systems that are reviewed can help ensure that the short term result is positive with 2 major properties - they cover a large percentage of the field AND they mask losses with Martingale. These tactics are good for elevating the probability of a short term win at the expense of a potential devastating loss. These tactics are good for making videos, but can be disastrous in real-world conditions for real money.
Although the house edge is almost double, the outcomes in a short TH-cam video shouldn't necessarily affect the demonstration too much. He prefers using a single 0 wheel for demonstrations, and I doubt he would make 2 videos for every single roulette strategy.
@@Dj87887 I was responding to his question in the video: He asked the audience if they wanted him to use a 2-zero wheel. I am simply informing him that I would like to see his demonstrations on an American Roulette wheel (2-zeroes).
Any roulette strategy can lose. I've lost with plenty of strategies. The point of modifications is that the original systems are usually terrible, and the modifications will lose you less money, not make you more money. One glaring example is the strategy reviewed on CEG where the submitter's strategy was to bet on every single corner. This means that you are doubling on the middle column and halving on the first and third columns, meaning you literally lose money when hitting on the first and third columns. If you're already planning to lose when hitting on first and third, then by simply making just one middle column bet, you can spend less money for the same exact profits and same exact losses when hitting 1-36 and lose less when 0/00 hits. That's the point of a modification. Lose less, not win more.
You're missing the point. He's making bets on a single zero wheel that you can't make in real life in most casinos. That us why he should demonstrate in a double zero wheel
I had a poll and the results were very close…single 0 came out on top…but I plan on doing some Single 0 videos very soon. Edit: Whoops - I meant I'll do some DOUBLE 0 videos soon!
I would play 5 Double Streets, put $20 on 3 Double Streets, and $15 on 2 other Double Streets. The result is the same, but you can divide up the whacks better this way. Also, only add to your bets after every 2nd loss.
Don't you think since you covered 30 numbers, is better to do positive progression, for example, when you win add one set to all your bet until you win $100 ,after that restart again. And if you lose stay with seam bet
Ok,when you will show as your top of the top,the best of the best system or top 3 systems.Thank you
I agree all negative ones rather just see the ones he likes...lol
Yes please, can you review the top 3 systems ? 😜🙏
great and informative videos. keep it up. you got a subscriber here
Tried this one out. Used waaaaaay smaller bets on a ERG table. 4X on a loss and if I hit the high 19-36 I still made some profit and when hitting one of the double streets it brought me back to the break even. I'd give this one a B+ to an A- and the only reason is it becomes really a boring strategy after a while.
Also the player doesn't have to bet 4 units on the 50/50 bet and 1 unit on two double streets. I play 2 units on a 50/50 and one unit on the opposite dozen that has no coverage. I play on ERG tables with .20 units to build up the bankroll then when I progressively increase the unit amounts. On a penny roulette table I've started off with as little as .02 cent units which then gives me the most amount of donks I can absorb if I fall into an unlucky streak.
You have to be lucky no matter what the bet. This type of bet is quite good because your immediate response to losing will return your loss. Most systems you have to play many spins to recover. Maybe good for a couple to play together.
No need to Martingale if you are already up with 60+.
I know this is a dumb question but….If you were forced to play 000 wheel what would you recommend ?
If you were forced to play 000, just bet min.
If I were forced to play 000, I’d probably play a system where I wait for 1000 Reds to hit in a row, then I’d bet $1 on Red.
So when you win on second tier your still short of when you first started and have to make everything back? That's all progress lost and still out of pocket
Would you be more ok with the 3x martingale when playing super low limit with a sizeable bankroll?
3x Martingale is how to recover when betting 2 dozens or 2 columns. I've calculated in the past that I could make 7 full bets with a 3x Martingale, and I've seen 7+ in a row on the same dozen before. I even devised a Martingale strategy for one dozen or one column with a different progression than doubling when I first started playing roulette, and I lost my bankroll when the column that I was betting on didn't show up for 18 spins. You really just can't tell.
I just don't like betting methods where you put money down only to hedge or break even. So i would use your modification but add $5 to the dozen bet. I would change the martingale to where you have to get whacked 2 times in a row before increasing your bet. I would also add if some numbers becomes hot i would start doing straight up single number bets .
Cover six numbers for three spins then martingale. It's always better with less numbers covered on the board
x3 martingale one a single loss is extreme for me especially when your ahead. Like the first loss you were still up 40 bucks. 60 to win 20, sounds like you're better off betting 2 dozens, 60 would get you 30. Yes you get more numbers to loss but you get half the money as a win with no push, here you get 1/3rd.
Personally I don't like making beats where I beat risk more to get less.
Another great video ty. Please could you cover the CEG Win $126 a Spin with this Roulette Strategy video that you commented on. Thanks.
If you check the comments on that video, I mentioned that they bet on 37 numbers, which is always a Durian from me. I may have a more detailed video on it later, though.
How is that possible when the minimum is 10 and maximum is 500
First please only do double zero. Everything is better with single zero and just not typically found near mot people casinos.
Also could you start a series on Craps? I'd really like to hear your input on systems there.
I really like craps, nothing like the payouts and simplicity. Personally expanding my gaming into other games to shake things up. So doesn't have to be my suggestion but tryout more then just roulette and blackjack. Just an idea, if you don't like those games then I understand.
Maybe split your play 1/2 on 0 and half the play on 00. Or if you have more American than do 00 if more European players single 0.
Now that I have a simulator, most reviews will have simulated stats for single 0, double 0, and even 000.
How come you don't rate the system that makes the most money as a Grapefruit? I just checked out your site and Hopscotch was rated a Grapefruit from you but you lost money? Isn't the purpose of a Grapfruit System - to make money?
I don't think how much you win in a short session is the best indicator of a good system. In such a small sample size, pretty much anything can happen. And the systems that CEG rates have a wild range of buy-in amounts and average bet sizes. It's easy for a trial to make a ton of money if you're betting thousands per spin on Red.
And a lot of the systems that are reviewed can help ensure that the short term result is positive with 2 major properties - they cover a large percentage of the field AND they mask losses with Martingale. These tactics are good for elevating the probability of a short term win at the expense of a potential devastating loss. These tactics are good for making videos, but can be disastrous in real-world conditions for real money.
Please use an American Roulette wheel.
Although the house edge is almost double, the outcomes in a short TH-cam video shouldn't necessarily affect the demonstration too much. He prefers using a single 0 wheel for demonstrations, and I doubt he would make 2 videos for every single roulette strategy.
@@Dj87887 I was responding to his question in the video: He asked the audience if they wanted him to use a 2-zero wheel. I am simply informing him that I would like to see his demonstrations on an American Roulette wheel (2-zeroes).
Who play in real live with 2000000 bank?When you will show a normal reali winning system?The best one...
Hi Hawaii man..if you lose more than 4 times..bye bye your moneyhhhhh
340 winnnn
well hav lost playing u modified MLM....😁
Any roulette strategy can lose. I've lost with plenty of strategies. The point of modifications is that the original systems are usually terrible, and the modifications will lose you less money, not make you more money. One glaring example is the strategy reviewed on CEG where the submitter's strategy was to bet on every single corner. This means that you are doubling on the middle column and halving on the first and third columns, meaning you literally lose money when hitting on the first and third columns. If you're already planning to lose when hitting on first and third, then by simply making just one middle column bet, you can spend less money for the same exact profits and same exact losses when hitting 1-36 and lose less when 0/00 hits. That's the point of a modification. Lose less, not win more.
What is the best to have a chance to win
NO stay on European!!! Why would u play 00
You're missing the point. He's making bets on a single zero wheel that you can't make in real life in most casinos. That us why he should demonstrate in a double zero wheel
I don't understand why you continue to use a single zero wheel when most of your subscribers only have access to a double zero wheel
I had a poll and the results were very close…single 0 came out on top…but I plan on doing some Single 0 videos very soon.
Edit: Whoops - I meant I'll do some DOUBLE 0 videos soon!
@@JackAceDotCom I hope you mean double zero lol
@@DT-ol6nj Yeah, I meant I'll do some 00 videos soon. Keep watching!