HUGE POTENTIAL...SMALL BUY-IN! 🐔🐔 "Dirty Bird"

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 84

  • @JoeKind1958
    @JoeKind1958 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Here is my version. Play 3 streets with 3 units on each street. I just dropped the 10th bet. You can spin 3 times and then add 3 more units on each street or simply add 1 unit on each, each spin. With 11 to 1 win on a single street I have found that Martingale is simply not needed. I am a low roller so my playing style is all about keeping the built up losses as low as possible. I have lost too many bankrolls to Martingale, never again. I do well using slow progressions, why change now 😁

  • @GrahamPopp
    @GrahamPopp ปีที่แล้ว +7

    (LVL 1) 10$ - Lose 3 in a row go to next level
    (LVL 2) 20$ - Lose 2 in a row go to next level
    (LVL 3) 40$ - Lose 2 in a row go to next level
    (LVL 4) 80$ - Lose 2 in a row go to next level
    After losing the 3 in a row on LVL1, double the bet after losing 2 rounds to cover your losses and make a small profit.
    With this system I use a buy-in of 235$ on a $5 minimum ($0.50 units) E-Roulette game, allows for 9 losses and a chance of redemption on the 10th round.

    • @gregoriopinero1590
      @gregoriopinero1590 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      money maker

    • @JamesMichael333
      @JamesMichael333 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That does leave you enough tries to hit though. The wheel can be spun easily 15 or 16 times without landing on the 10 bet numbers. So you really need that 3rd spin before you double, even if that 3rd spin does bring you back to your profit level.

  • @edwardjackson9871
    @edwardjackson9871 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    You explain things a lot better than. CEG guys

    • @JamesMichael333
      @JamesMichael333 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CEG is complete trash. They don’t explain ANYTHING. And when they do it’s incoherent babble.

  • @griffeydog
    @griffeydog ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thankyou Jack! This strategy has turned out to be a real money winner for me. One important change....I DO NOT increase my bets. It is much easier to have loses that don't bury me. So far, I've left with $500 profit multiple times after a max of 50 spins. Largest drawdown has been around 15 spins or $375. Keep up the great info!!! :)

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, Martingaling isn’t for everyone. Just play at what stakes you’re comfortable with.

  • @desleycasey7412
    @desleycasey7412 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoy watching your feedback on CEG roulette systems. I found I have more success if I put $10 on the first dozen until I get a win and then switch between 1st, 2nd and 3rd dozens, depending on what #'s come up that I'm losing on. I also increase the total bet by 2 units (after the first 3 losses) and I'm usually able to recoup the losses + make a wee bit more. Still I do need to test this further. However as most EGM in a casino in Aussie land only give 15 seconds to place the bet, it is easier and faster to place the $10 on the dozen rather than single $1 units on 10 # in a specific dozen.

  • @tedroesch9133
    @tedroesch9133 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Your alternate betting strategies are worth watching for.

  • @jl2696
    @jl2696 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love your videos Jack. I do wanna mention something previously brought up by the guys at CEG that you should note: a lot of computerized roulette gaming companies such as Interblock won't allow systems that are considered "low risk, low profit" anymore. An example would be covering 19 - 36 with $30 and 12 - 12 with $20. Similarly with Interblock, you can't cover 2 dozens/columns AND cover both greens on one spin.

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thanks for the update. I’ve had some discussions on CEG’s Discord about this. It sounds like it’s happening at a few properties, but not all.
      To me this is just stupid. The casinos are going to get their EV in the long run and if this makes people bet smaller, then they will make less money. This is a bad move by the casinos.

    • @joev.7909
      @joev.7909 ปีที่แล้ว

      FUNNY How the Casinos throughout and BAN "Card Counters" accuse them of CHEATING!!!!! NONSENSE!!!!! There is NOTHING WRONG with remembering what cards have been played!!!!! That is part of the GAME!!!!! And By them moving to continuous shufflers I would say that is worse because the Casino is NOT using actual 52 card decks!!!!! That is NOT FAIR!!!!! SHOULD CASINOS HAVE A LEGAL PASS TO THEN "STEAL" From their customers????? OF COURSE NOT!!!!! Same thing APPLIES to Roulette here. You should be able to make ANY BET YOU WANT!!!!! And by the Casino saying "NO YOU CANT" then they're CHEATING and should be INVESTIGATED By the Gaming Commission Immediately If NOT SOONER!!!!! And By The Way I CANNOT Card Count!!!!!

  • @williamfoster7920
    @williamfoster7920 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I absolutely agree with you regarding gaining multiples of your bet on a win...
    Great vids and info.
    So glad I found your channel... Keep up the good work.

  • @StevetheeGambler
    @StevetheeGambler ปีที่แล้ว +1

    On the third spin on every level you're still down if you happen to hit a win. I've also had sessions where a dozen hasn't hit in over 25 rounds and it does happen alot more often than one would think... To make it more budget friendly you can just pick a dozen and multiply your bet 1.5x on every loss.

  • @johnblyth9787
    @johnblyth9787 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I can give you a system I believe is good. Wait for 2 blacks. Then bet on red 1 unit. Then wait for 2 blacks and 1 unit on red. On a loss super martingale. 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63, 127, 255, 511. If you get a zero wait for 2 blacks. My testing on a free game I was up 9,000 units and no losses. It needs a bank roll 1,013 units

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do you want to give it a name? What is the buy in and when do you quit/walk away?

  • @superliegebeest544
    @superliegebeest544 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Anyone here knows about how the computerroulette in the casino, with a real wheel works? I understand software roulette works with a randomizer, but now there is a real wheel also. Is that wheel fake and has magnets so the wheel adjust to the randomizer? So its actually the software that decides the number? Or if the wheel decides tthe outcome, than how the computer reads the number? And is there a standard speed the ball rols and the wheel turns? Like a real dealer doesnt have that and different dealers use different force. In shorts by studying the computer roulette there may be an advantage if u can figure out how it actually works.

  • @viettuannguyen3
    @viettuannguyen3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like your videos! Thanks for adding your input and modifying it! Keep it up!

  • @nestoralvarez8035
    @nestoralvarez8035 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    NO TENGO FORMA DE ENTENDER SOLO HABLO ESPAÑOL, PERO TRATO DE ENTENDER POR LO BIEN MOSTRADO EL SISTEMA

  • @MikeCGaming
    @MikeCGaming ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really liked this one.
    I still would increase like 5 to 10% every loss before the martingale and then after the third loss, i'd martingale on top of all the increments I made.

    • @joev.7909
      @joev.7909 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Mike- Please explain further about your betting strategy. Thanks!

    • @MikeCGaming
      @MikeCGaming ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joev.7909 Best strategy is to not play.

  • @FishnFrank420
    @FishnFrank420 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also you didn't change the section of dozens you were betting on. Would you change per bet or wait the 3 bets on 1 set of dozens?

  • @pokerlife1137
    @pokerlife1137 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I've seen a dozen sleep for 27 spins in a row

    • @jl2696
      @jl2696 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was that on a live wheel or an electronic wheel?

    • @fjrboedimantz9357
      @fjrboedimantz9357 ปีที่แล้ว

      Damn 27 donks

  • @mickerzsnickerz
    @mickerzsnickerz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you ever change your rating even after you simplify the bets for a strategy? Or does your rating also take into account your revised strategy?

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, I often do. My original rating for this system was a C (plum) and I upgraded it to B (peach).

  • @ivancane8535
    @ivancane8535 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The progression is 1,1,1,2,2,2,4,4,4 and I always double up after three losses? Thanks

  • @edwardjackson9871
    @edwardjackson9871 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question. After the 4th loss, do you double again or keep it at 20 for 3 spins before doubling again

    • @caciocavalloster
      @caciocavalloster ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I asked the same question but no one can respond.

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว

      It is supposed to be 3 losses per level and then you double the bets again.

    • @caciocavalloster
      @caciocavalloster ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JackAceDotCom so if betting 10$ on first 3 spins, (level1) after 3 losses you go to 20$ for next 3 spins (level 2), after another 3 spins (level 3) of losses you would go to 40$ per spin? If at level 3 and you get a win how many other spins do you need to recover?

    • @gregoriopinero1590
      @gregoriopinero1590 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      in level 3 with the secon martingale, third bet you lose money@@JackAceDotCom

  • @billm.2337
    @billm.2337 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm new to Roulette, I tried this method and even when I won I was still down money and didn't recoup my losses. Payout was 35-1, but regardless I shouldn't have been down I wouldn't think. I made it to my 3rd bet on the 3rd round of betting before I finally won so shouldn't that $40 hit brought me back to even?

  • @caciocavalloster
    @caciocavalloster ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whats is the progression after 3 wacks? Is it martingale every following spin until a win? I just did 12 spins of losses!

    • @caciocavalloster
      @caciocavalloster ปีที่แล้ว

      ??

    • @fjrboedimantz9357
      @fjrboedimantz9357 ปีที่แล้ว

      You up your bet by twice amount of your bet, and do 3 times if it still didn't hit then martingale.

  • @edwardjackson9871
    @edwardjackson9871 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does it make a difference in odds if you combined this system with the one where you wait for a 12 not to show up 5 times and then bet 10 numbers in that 12?

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No. Waiting for a streak doesn’t do a thing to change your odds of winning. It does prevent you from betting on every spin, which reduces how much you lose per hour, though.

  • @TheMarceloSilva
    @TheMarceloSilva ปีที่แล้ว +1

    could you review the system "planet 66" from CEG? thanks

  • @FishnFrank420
    @FishnFrank420 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why did u do single zero over a double zero? I think the double zero is most common for any viewer. Just wondering

  • @helptxteachers
    @helptxteachers ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do the ten numbers have to be in the same dozen?

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Statistically, it makes no difference. They can be any 10 numbers. You can even pick the zero(es).

    • @helptxteachers
      @helptxteachers ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JackAceDotCom thanks. I love your straight lace statistical approach.

    • @helptxteachers
      @helptxteachers ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JackAceDotCom played this over the weekend and had success.

  • @CaptainPhoton64
    @CaptainPhoton64 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What system do you use the most to make money

  • @rui17
    @rui17 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can i play this at lightning roulette??

  • @viettuannguyen3
    @viettuannguyen3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi jack! I'm on your website and playing around bet analyzer! Such an amazing tool. I have a question on it. Can you elaborate and explain the EV/spin and comp/spin? EV stands for expected value? Comp stands for compensation? I kind of understand it a little based on adding more bets the EV becomes more negative. When you make strategies, do you want the EV/spin closer to zero as possible? I'm not quite sure how to interpret comp/spin other than more bets, higher comp. Thank you again for the awesome tool and videos!

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's a link to an instructional video in the Roulette Bet Analyzer. You can watch this video for more details: th-cam.com/video/OI3F0JfM_To/w-d-xo.html
      Basically the EV is your expected loss per spin. You're going to lose 5.26% of every dollar wagered. There's no getting around that.
      Comp Value is the approximation of how much you'll earn in "comps" if you're being rated on a players card. Earnings can be used for Room, Food, and Beverage (RFB) within the casino property group. This is typically 20% of your expected loss, but it can vary wildly depending on the Pit Boss' assessment of your average bet and the speed of the game.

  • @bluemoon2934
    @bluemoon2934 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    By staying on the same dozen time after time you’ll encounter many times when the wheel becomes biased to the other two dozen and this can easily go on for 10 times or more…..And your bets could get so high that you’ll reach table max and lose your bankroll….

  • @alexchristopher221
    @alexchristopher221 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've played this strategy but with the Fibonacci instead of the Martingale.

  • @Dark_Crown
    @Dark_Crown ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd rather play "Italian Grinder."

  • @stiliyanyanakiev5106
    @stiliyanyanakiev5106 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always doble affther 3 loss or not,can you expline?

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว

      With this system you are supposed to double your bets if you lose 3 times in a row at the same level. You can choose to do this or just stay at the same betting level, but then it takes a lot longer to recover from losses.

  • @brettmorton6513
    @brettmorton6513 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey brotha from anotha, how about moving the bet around, meaning, not betting on last 2 that hit?? might work!

  • @ericgoldstein6780
    @ericgoldstein6780 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm curious to know the comment in title says buy in $200 gives you 20 bullets ?
    How please

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว

      Perhaps "bullets" is the wrong word, since there's a negative progression with this system. I've changed it. It was meant to mean 20 initial starting bets.

  • @charlespage4380
    @charlespage4380 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I tried this and it appears on spin 3, 6, 9,etc; you are ;losing money with the win. -10, -10, and -9. While winning 35. 35-39= -4.
    So I modified a bit and doubled after each 2nd loss. It turned out well for me in simulator but it can get expensive fast too.
    Your thought please.

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you're talking about winning on your 3rd attempt, the win doesn't completely cover the losses that came before it, but it comes "close enough". If you have a steady number of wins on the 1st or 2nd attempt, you're going to trend upward.
      In general, I'm not in favor of Martingaling more than 2x, as a way to recover from losses quicker, but it really depends on how risk averse you are. Like you said, the bets can get scary big.

    • @edwardjackson9871
      @edwardjackson9871 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t understand how you are losing money on the 3rd spin if you win it.
      Lose -10 on 1st spin, -10 on 2nd spin, win 26 on 3rd spin, so net gain of 6 on win in 3rd spin.
      Am I missing something?

    • @angrypuppyca
      @angrypuppyca ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@edwardjackson9871 You win money on spins 1-5. From there on it is downhill.

  • @jashaakmeester6628
    @jashaakmeester6628 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes hi from Aruba westindis Mi like to si you try dhe sistem kolm 1 + kolm 3 as esprit bets and $5 in dhe middle 3d kolm.

  • @DavidR42000
    @DavidR42000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Maybe someone can suggest a good roulette software, number predictions and so on 😉?

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว

      If you find something that "predicts" the next number, it wouldn't be worth a penny.

    • @DavidR42000
      @DavidR42000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JackAceDotCom how about shadowroullete on youtube...? Is it fake or scam? 😉🤔

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว

      If he thinks he can predict the next number, then yeah, it’s complete BS.

  • @supermanivalex1153
    @supermanivalex1153 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love this system

  • @shanksters4898
    @shanksters4898 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is this app or site you play on?

    • @JackAceDotCom
      @JackAceDotCom  ปีที่แล้ว

      It should be in the video description. It's called Roulette Royale for iOS: apps.apple.com/us/app/roulette-royale-grand-casino/id443369563

  • @aroonspace
    @aroonspace 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Working well

  • @crtarusan
    @crtarusan ปีที่แล้ว

    Lost 11 in a row, lol! When you get to tier 3 you will not recover. You’ll end up chasing your losses with this system. After winning on the 12th spin, ended up losing 9 in a row.

  • @DT-ol6nj
    @DT-ol6nj ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why don't you play on an American wheel. 25 dollar minimum per bet in most casinos for single zero

  • @wil2197
    @wil2197 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's mind boggling how bad this system is, mainly because of the marty strategy.
    You hit anywhere in your first five spins, you profit a various amount. After that...
    Spin 6- Lose: Down 90 Win: Down 18!
    Spin 7- Lose: Down 130 Win: Up 14
    Spin 8- Lose: Down 170 Win: DOWN 26!
    Spin 9- Lose: Down 210 Win DOWN 64!!😮😮😮
    Three out of the last four spins in this system are losses either way. Maybe you're in the game longer but still.
    Very disappointed that both Jackace and Ceg didn't do the math.

  • @sonnyonesvinas4861
    @sonnyonesvinas4861 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Risky

  • @weerobot
    @weerobot ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pray to Korean Jesus...lol

  • @nordattack
    @nordattack ปีที่แล้ว

    This system sucks. First try out on simulator I was minus $3138 after 36 spins.

    • @evcin1
      @evcin1 ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely needs a modification.

  • @sonnyonesvinas4861
    @sonnyonesvinas4861 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very wrong strat🤣🤣🤣 thats machine it loose u 10 lost...this bad even i martiangke🤣🤣🤣✌✌

  • @ZoltanVizsi
    @ZoltanVizsi 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Not playin a real rulett wheel ,makes this a useless test.

  • @davesmith6779
    @davesmith6779 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve seen 15 numbers not hit for 22 spins multiple times . I’ve seen 18 numbers not hit for 19 many times