This is a video re-creation of one cadet's accomplishment of a mission during LDAC 2012 at Fort Lewis, Washington. It is intended to foster classroom discussion.
When you receive on net “how copy” you are supposed to repeat what the other person said to you such as grid coordinates, then they say good or bad copy meaning you did or didn’t write information correctly.
Is the assault through the kill zone, worth doing? I mean that is an open road. And gun fire and claymore could alert so many other enemies in that area.
Squad leader controls 2 teams including their respective team leaders while a team leader controls one team i.e. 3 other soldiers as well as themselves.
Squad leader controls alpha team. Alpha team is the entire squad. Bravo and charley team are controlled by fire team leaders. For example if squad is ambushed the SL can simply say "bravo team hold supressive fire" and "charley team flank enemy left"
It's actually VBS2, a training simulator by Bohemia Interactive Simulations, the ArmA series is developed by Bohemia Interactive(without the Simulations).
I'm not sure if you missed it at 0:30 but you can see it says that the video is intended for classroom discussion. The video by itself isn't meant to be the source of education.
"Charlie 3-1, send it," he says, standing 2ft in front of him. I'm going to start greeting all my friends in this way from now on.
It’s meant to simulate a radio call. The grader acts as the higher up on the other end of the call
3:40 - "Nope. It all makes sense." Lost it.
Still laughing.
LMAO
Nope. Got it.
Why is it funny? I don't get it.
@@jabloko992 its funny because ussually no ones gets the damn contingency plans at the first time
1:23 gives him a look like "can you slow down?"
As they approached the dead enemy, I heard a fly buzzing. Nice touch.
Left side security sees enemy convoy:
"So anyway I started blastin"
Best movie I've seen in years I need more bro
Forgot to mention the tactical map to higher during the SALUTE report...
Do you know where that claymore is?
Yeah by that tree over there
Why put an AR as security? Wouldn’t you want him at your S&O and then pull him onto the Support line because it is the most casualty producing weapon?
When you receive on net “how copy” you are supposed to repeat what the other person said to you such as grid coordinates, then they say good or bad copy meaning you did or didn’t write information correctly.
Did they... Blow up the map instead of passing that up? Besides that, who blows up a map?
Is the assault through the kill zone, worth doing? I mean that is an open road. And gun fire and claymore could alert so many other enemies in that area.
cool guys don't look at explosions.
Whats the difference between the squad leader and team leader and their roles?
Squad leader controls 2 teams including their respective team leaders while a team leader controls one team i.e. 3 other soldiers as well as themselves.
Squad leader controls alpha team. Alpha team is the entire squad. Bravo and charley team are controlled by fire team leaders. For example if squad is ambushed the SL can simply say "bravo team hold supressive fire" and "charley team flank enemy left"
Why is th f-ing grass blue?
No OPORD just a WARNO?
Its an unnecessary use of a sniper team, and most squads have one or two designated marksman.
Are any of your scripts/addons or mods available to VBS2 PE (civilian users)?
what are they using for this? Looks like combat mission
It's VBS2, the commercial/government version of Arma.
What is the ranks for squad leaders
how do they make these videos?
bfears with magic
because it isn't call of duty....
R. I. Runs by and tosses arti simulator. Fun and games fun and games.
How is this game called?
ARMA 2
It's actually VBS2, a training simulator by Bohemia Interactive Simulations, the ArmA series is developed by Bohemia Interactive(without the Simulations).
why sniper is not part of squad
Highly dependant on squad and unit, I’m on a armoured unit assigned an SDMR m110a1 but I’ve only ever touched it and fired it one a year
Amerika ist so verloren
BAD .......NO REAL LIFE SCENARIO....PRE-DERTERMINED OUTCOME......NO DOCTRINE...NOTHING TO LEARN
I'm not sure if you missed it at 0:30 but you can see it says that the video is intended for classroom discussion. The video by itself isn't meant to be the source of education.
This is the general framework meant to be applied to real life scenarios. Everything is METTTC dependent.
This is entirely wrong
why?