Fire Support: Range Corrections - Bracketing

There are four techniques that can be used to conduct area adjustment fires. Successive bracketing is best when observers are inexperienced or when precise adjustment is required, such as precision registrations and destruction missions. It mathematically ensures that fire for effect rounds will be within 50 meters of the target. Hasty bracketing is best when responsive fires are required and the observer is experienced in the adjustment of fire. One-round adjustment provides the most responsive fires but generally requires either an experienced observer or an observer equipped with a laser range finder. Creeping fire is used in danger close missions. This video focuses on successive bracketing.
Practice this skill at:
oegames.tradoc.army.mil/oft/i...

[@cptn0crispy]

when yall said "mk1 eyeballs"....... lmao

[@dontidwell]

used daily in Snow Hall

[@NicholasVossVader545]

Currently at BLC have to give a class on adjusting fire. This video made my job a lot easier! Thanks battle!

[@Savage_N_Sinister]

vader545 hope you explained OT factor. After seeing all those crazy long and short distances thrown up, never once being the same distance at the same impact point, anyone with half an idea what was going on earlier in the video was probably lost after the last portion of the video.

[@Joty295]

Same bro. Hope you got it lol

[@jacobkirtley7802]

I just swore in as a 13F. Going to watch every day until I ship. Thanks!

[@Zero_Twice_00]

Hey. How’s your army career goin? Love it?😂

[@tinafriesner3141]

OPSec dood

[@macklinbranson2049]

Update? I just swore in my self 13f option 40

[@OnTheRiver14]

@@macklinbranson2049same how’d it go for you?

[@zumorc]

The Call For Fire Process (as in FM 6-30 (Ch 4)) would be great!

[@dontidwell]

back in FAOBC, we had to do classroom training on adjusting fire. It was hard as hell because it was a 2D simulation. When we got to the field, and actually adjusted live fire, it was much easier

[@stopthatimmediately]

the sequence of impacts at the end was pretty useful. cheers.

[@zirndorfredleg7688]

Did this with a PRC77, binos and compass and map.

[@melfisher1683]

Roger That.

[@zumorc]

Manual Gunnery would also be very interesting.
I think you need to focus on the respective basic "core" topics first before hitting the advanced levels, then these videos have the potential to become an integral part of the Army's training assets and the baseplate of any instructional framework.

[@zumorc]

More of these Field Artillery related vids please.

[@rxTV_defence_forces]

Nicely explanied ❤❤

[@Creative1722]

i was watching "danger close fire from generation kill" and this was in my recommended

[@Saaod92]

The Iraqi special operations man passed through here 🇮🇶🇮🇶

[@psychshell4644]

Way cool, this Army momma caught on right away. Sign me up

[@rottvang]

I was made in Fort Sill

[@shupichii9647]

*initial blast*
Drop 400
plus 75, send effect.

[@zumorc]

Both would be nice, but first Fire Support then Gunnery...

[@Revi0us]

Just because active soldiers know all this doesn't mean civilians aren't interested in the process themselves. Lots of war movies and shows and games feature calls for artillery and it's nice to know what "Plus one, strike three, fire concentration charlie, drop 200, left 100, fire for effect" means.

[@vybezD]

If I joined the military this is exactly what I would want to do.

[@rcpd3359]

Is this game arma or vbs?

[@benquinneyiii7941]

Miss on purpose?

[@da_cat]

To make a long video short ... if something blows up in front of you ... then something behind you ... you better run ....

[@coochykilla]

1:07

[@determined919]

13F baby. Ship to basic in January

[@rontha2]

me too

[@determined919]

Ronald Murray What fort?

[@rontha2]

Seadog95​ Ft. Jackson

[@determined919]

Ronald Murray Cool me too

[@_mason_s]

Seadog95 me too man. Good Luck

[@zirndorfredleg7688]

C

[@081908009999]

why not use foot or stones? what the hell is meter?