Why using so much of older content when it most often does not even fit into the storyline. The older Videos were much better to watch as they were straight forward and easy to follow. You've done way better before
@@earthlingsunited on Average this is LOw Value Content like this one 5 days. High Value Content like the Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle around 30 days
Look like Ukraine should point the missiles after. The chopper are likely to chase the drones down. If the drones try to initiate the attack on the helicopter, they’ll give away their position.
When the invasion started, I thought Ukraine will fall within 2 weeks. I am really impressed by Ukrainian resilience, holding off the Russians for over 2 years.
Therefore, no one is in a hurry with the world - neither the United States, nor Russia, nor Ukraine itself. Ukraine allowed more than 10 million people to leave, several million did not want to return from the territory of Russia. Ukraine is still a financial black hole. When its population decreases to 15 million people, then the West or Russia, who succeeds more, will be able to establish an acceptable standard of living there. Therefore, the game is played for a long time.
@@keryamladhiy Where on Earth do you get your numbers??? Independent sources state that Russia has lost 3 times as many soldiers as Ukraine. This is mostly due to the "meat wave" style attacks Russia uses. I should also mention that 1/3 of the Russian Black Sea fleet has been sunk, including the flagship, while the rest has retreated from the area. Your air force is doing no better with one SU35 fighter being destroyed each day this month. All of Russia's oil refineries are now being attacked. It's arms trade has also died a death as countries see how poorly Russia armaments are doing. The biggest loss though is to good will - I suspect it will be a long time till people will trust or trade with Russia. Is there a particular reason you're not currently fighting for Russia?
When i saw this, i was like wtf? This is something that a 7-year-old me would imagine about. I thought that this was a ridiculous idea because I know nothing about these things. But Ukraine actually did it. Mind blown
Except it's useless as there are no hits recorded... Planes move too fast, helicopters attack it from side or rear and this increases drone's radar cross section making it easier to detect...
Спешу напомнить, что как всегда против России прямо или косвенно воюет более пятидесяти стран. Все деньги, практически всё оружие, вся разведка НАТО, и даже тысячи и тысячи "наёмников" стран НАТО - НЕ украинское. Украинцы - это расходный материал блока НАТО, чтобы разграбить украину и навредить своим прямым конкурентам в Европе и России. Напоминаю, что больше всех от этих "санкций" пострадала именно западная Европа. Всё что есть у украины - это наследие России и то, что поставляет украине страны НАТО. Если страны НАТО прекратят поставки, то война закончится. А значит и перестанут умирать украинцы.
Копируем хронологию и вспоминаем почему проект украина прекращает своё существование *Для тех, кто считает что в Украине НЕТ нацистов и фашистов! ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО К ПРОСМОТРУ* *Корсунский погром* *Артём Гришанов - Игрушки / Toys for Poroshenko / War in Ukraine (English subtitles)*
Итог: *Shocking losses of Ukraine. Час украинских кладбищ*
"Tell that to the ships on the bottom of the sea!" -----> Напоминаю, что при распаде СССР , украине досталась не только огромная территория, огромная промышленность, население в 52 миллиона человек, но и ТРЕТЬЯ АРМИЯ В МИРЕ. Это было больше, чем у Китая. Украинский флот прекратил своё существование. У России четыре флота и каспийская флотилия. Все они постоянно пополняются новейшими кораблями. Неужели вы реально верите в то, что если бы Россия хотела умножить население украины на ноль, то Киев и другие города не испарились бы в считанные минуты? Вы настолько наивные? У России есть средства, которые могут всю Европу превратить в лунный пейзаж без использования ядерного оружия.
Those are not Ukranian drones. They are NATO drones manufactured in Germany Ukraine is a broke country with no money that relies on NATO for everything
@@MrSGL21 I believe the Soviets tried this concept on their SU-27, the gamble limit of R-73's seeker is actually wide enough for those roughly aimed launches.
Aaw that make sense now THAT IS WHY THE U.S. LEFT TONS OF BILLIONS DOLLARS WORTH OF EQUIPMENT BEHIND IN AFGANISTAN.. BECUZ THE U.S. WERE USING THE MI-8 HELICOPTERS
They need sort of like a naval wingman drone. Helicopter goes after one. The wingman can maneuver to take out the other. At least till they can figure something else out. Looks like they are fixing the kinks as it goes.
Russia need to employee small boats with paddle guns. 3 to4 crew per boat. A gun boat in command with radar and commanding 10 small boats. And multiple groups like this. The same thing that Sri Lankans used in thir civil war.
@@drgonzo305 конечно, всё так, и украина побеждает бежа назад, закрывая свои границы для мужчин и принудительной мобилизации, всё это говорит о скорой победе украины
Great explanation. Please do detailed information about the "scopes " in artillery and motors. Like how a scout is able to give enymy positions to the artillery/motor teams, and how they calibrate firing. And how sights on artillery really function. Bravo to your awesome classes.
If the Ukrainian builders aimed one frontal and one backwards the Helicopter would-be dead. They could also mount a rotatable missile turret. They are experts at developing drone upgrades.
exactly, a better idea would be to put an American AIM-9M on a launcher that can turn up and down 360 degrees. While firing a missile at a target above the drone would damage the drone, it would be a one-way mission anyway so that wouldn’t be that big of a problem, especially if they managed to shoot down a helicopter.
@@FreeRojava2025 turning mounts are heavy, even at it lightest configuration it a lot of space and weight required. That would shift the centre of gravity and complicate it production. Sometimes simple is best.
La nave russa si dovrebbe posizionare fissa su un punto strategico protetta da mine e reti anti drone.. oltre agli elicotteri, non ci vuole un gran studio...
Hey not to be a nitpick but the tail rotor isn’t spinning on the mi 8 when you introduce it at the start. Not a big deal but just wanted to let you know
interesting idea, but poor implementation. there is an opinion that the missile cannot see the target due to the target’s low altitude above the water. Helicopters do not fly high, while missiles have restrictions on the height of their use.
Ukraine conduct Sea operations in broad daylight, strapping rocket launchers to a sea drone! Thats a little far fetched! I did enjoy the cgi, top notch work! 😊
Look like Ukraine should point the missiles aft. The chopper are likely to chase the drones down. If the drones try to initiate the attack on the helicopter, they’ll give away their position.
Надо, чтобы наши западные противники столкнулись с таким оружием в Красном море. Хуситы, или ещё кто, друзей найти можно много, владелец доллара много кому навредил. Это благоприятно скажется на развитие Северного Морского Пути в РФ.
Hmm, don't like the design of that missile setup on that drone ship. They should have mounted one missile facing towards the stern for quicker response to helicopters approaching from the rear ... 🤔
An R-73 can go at mach 2.5, which is more than double the speed of the sound, I think that the animations are kind of slow here, still love your videos though
Given that the heli's like chsing the drone, it would make sense to mount the missiles on swivelling mount, or more simples, just point one missile forward and one aft.
The first time I saw footage of the missile-equipped sea drones being attacked by helicopters, I noted that both missiles were pointed forward and wondered why. It was foreseeable that they'd be pursued and I thought it would have been a better design to have pointed one of the missiles aft. I'm guessing after this, future versions will do it that way.
@@GrahamCStrouse Heat seeking missiles have an acceptance angle in which they'll detect a heat signature. Ukraine appears to be using R-73s, which, depending on the version, can detect targets anywhere from plus or minus 40 degrees from center up to plus or minus 75 degrees. So you can't fire one forward and expect that it will see something that's at your rear. Which is good, lest it detects your own heat signature and comes after you.
Ukraine should be using its limited resources on the retreating frontline on the mainland and not wasting it on Crimea or the sea. Odesa will be taken from behind and not the sea.
@@FreeRojava2025if you look up the port city of Odesa on a map and where the Russians are advancing in the north & east of the Ukraine/Russian border. It will then make sense where tax payer money should be spent. Easier for Russia to attack by land than via Crimea or the Black Sea. Crimea has been a lost cause since the civil war began 10 years ago in 2014. The focus is on the wrong area and money Ukraine is begging for should be spent wisely and not wasted on pinpricks against Russian oil or naval fleet.
NATO and the United States are looking at Ukraine's sea drone attack, more and more the United States and NATO is learning from Ukraine how to fight Russia and other countries with drone technology, when Ukraine gets up to speed with their own weapons manufacturing, they will be exporting to pretty much every country on the planet except for Russia China North Korea and Iran.
R-73 can hit targets up to 15km altitude and 18km distance, targets like A-50 , igla have a range of only 2km , a helicopter canon can open fire from 3km with canon or from 10km with a anti tank missile.
is it possible to equip it a 360 degrees rotating missile launcher so that it could target the helicopter in every direction. could they use light weight missiles that are not only heat sinking but also anti radiation and could target the bridge as well?
Ukraine show them Russians what you can do you can do it better in Russian so show them you cannot they cannot stop you Ukraine I wish you thought about that earlier
Russia could have destroyed Ukraine's energy industry in the first month, plunging it into the Stone Age. But the trick is that she needs these territories along with cities and infrastructure. What I won't say about Poland, Romania or the Baltic states. Strikes by such drones are possible while there is a gray area. But Ukraine will definitely lose access to the sea, and if not, then the conflict will end for it another time with the loss of the coast.
@@TOdoubledizzle24 He is stating the truth. It IS that easy for Russia. They have long range missiles since 1970s. Russians can single handle destroy every single power plant and major bridges and dams in a week. They chose not to do so for whatever reason and plans that they have in mind for Ukraine. But according to me, that was Russia's biggest mistake in war. You can't dream of living and planning for the land you haven't conquered yet.
essential of a drone is continious control. water acts as an insulator for radio waves that makes it really challanging. it should be much more autonomous than sea drones are currently. but there are some submarine drones projects
The Yemeni Houthis have long learned to shoot down Saudi Arabian F-15s using an R-73 missile installed on the ground... They crossed a thermal imager with this missile! And yet, there is not a single confirmed victory of a Ukrainian drone over a Russian helicopter... So at the moment the system in this configuration is not effective against helicopters...
t mit deiner Kamera übersetzen I'm sure it works with an Ohio-class submarine, or a small bridge like in North York or San Francisco. But you destroy it yourself like you did with the 911.
Страна,которая не то что машину,но даже велосипед,полностью свой уже выпустить не может... ,,изобрела супер технологические,,дроны,и сама их производит? Хоть что то на Украине делают для них? Ну насмешили...
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 89 | คู่เอก "ยอดไอคิว vs คิริลล์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z3vYkHJ_5Ig/mqdefault.jpg)
Please Subscribe Thanks!
Bro how long does ot take you guys to render these animations on average? Cause your uploaded frequency for this level of content is surprising to me.
Great work as always but let me point out that the Ukraine flag from the beginning of the video has orange instead of yellow bottom half.
Why using so much of older content when it most often does not even fit into the storyline. The older Videos were much better to watch as they were straight forward and easy to follow. You've done way better before
@@earthlingsunited on Average this is LOw Value Content like this one 5 days.
High Value Content like the Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle around 30 days
@@izraelservantofalmightygod Noted It's Because of the Green Screen Stuff
Please make a video how ukrainian long range Cesna style air drones work.
Hmm Will take a look
Would be great to see but I think many build details are classified
Look like Ukraine should point the missiles after. The chopper are likely to chase the drones down. If the drones try to initiate the attack on the helicopter, they’ll give away their position.
When the invasion started, I thought Ukraine will fall within 2 weeks. I am really impressed by Ukrainian resilience, holding off the Russians for over 2 years.
Me too!
Therefore, no one is in a hurry with the world - neither the United States, nor Russia, nor Ukraine itself. Ukraine allowed more than 10 million people to leave, several million did not want to return from the territory of Russia. Ukraine is still a financial black hole. When its population decreases to 15 million people, then the West or Russia, who succeeds more, will be able to establish an acceptable standard of living there. Therefore, the game is played for a long time.
Но цена этой стойкости не только 10 миллионов мигрантов из Украины, но и 1,5 миллиона трупов и калек ВСУ
@@AitellyYeah remove the backups and supplies of over 175 billion dollars from 50 countries. Let's see how long they survive.
@@keryamladhiy Where on Earth do you get your numbers??? Independent sources state that Russia has lost 3 times as many soldiers as Ukraine. This is mostly due to the "meat wave" style attacks Russia uses. I should also mention that 1/3 of the Russian Black Sea fleet has been sunk, including the flagship, while the rest has retreated from the area. Your air force is doing no better with one SU35 fighter being destroyed each day this month. All of Russia's oil refineries are now being attacked. It's arms trade has also died a death as countries see how poorly Russia armaments are doing. The biggest loss though is to good will - I suspect it will be a long time till people will trust or trade with Russia. Is there a particular reason you're not currently fighting for Russia?
When i saw this, i was like wtf? This is something that a 7-year-old me would imagine about. I thought that this was a ridiculous idea because I know nothing about these things. But Ukraine actually did it. Mind blown
Except it's useless as there are no hits recorded... Planes move too fast, helicopters attack it from side or rear and this increases drone's radar cross section making it easier to detect...
@@ivanstepanovic1327 Tell that to the ships on the bottom of the sea!
Спешу напомнить, что как всегда против России прямо или косвенно воюет более пятидесяти стран. Все деньги, практически всё оружие, вся разведка НАТО, и даже тысячи и тысячи "наёмников" стран НАТО - НЕ украинское. Украинцы - это расходный материал блока НАТО, чтобы разграбить украину и навредить своим прямым конкурентам в Европе и России. Напоминаю, что больше всех от этих "санкций" пострадала именно западная Европа.
Всё что есть у украины - это наследие России и то, что поставляет украине страны НАТО. Если страны НАТО прекратят поставки, то война закончится. А значит и перестанут умирать украинцы.
Копируем хронологию и вспоминаем почему проект украина прекращает своё существование
*Для тех, кто считает что в Украине НЕТ нацистов и фашистов! ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО К ПРОСМОТРУ*
*Корсунский погром*
*Артём Гришанов - Игрушки / Toys for Poroshenko / War in Ukraine (English subtitles)*
Итог:
*Shocking losses of Ukraine. Час украинских кладбищ*
"Tell that to the ships on the bottom of the sea!" -----> Напоминаю, что при распаде СССР , украине досталась не только огромная территория, огромная промышленность, население в 52 миллиона человек, но и ТРЕТЬЯ АРМИЯ В МИРЕ. Это было больше, чем у Китая. Украинский флот прекратил своё существование. У России четыре флота и каспийская флотилия. Все они постоянно пополняются новейшими кораблями.
Неужели вы реально верите в то, что если бы Россия хотела умножить население украины на ноль, то Киев и другие города не испарились бы в считанные минуты? Вы настолько наивные? У России есть средства, которые могут всю Европу превратить в лунный пейзаж без использования ядерного оружия.
Drones are causing pain in naval warfare too! Ukraine's cheap and best ways are mind blowing!
Those are not Ukranian drones. They are NATO drones manufactured in Germany
Ukraine is a broke country with no money that relies on NATO for everything
Yes, they are cheap. But only for ukrainians who don't pay for them.
Scary future coming
Great move from the Drone army!
Seems like they should mount the missiles facing backwards so they can take out chasing helicopters
yeah thats not how 1970s era Ir missiles work.
@@MrSGL21 I believe the Soviets tried this concept on their SU-27, the gamble limit of R-73's seeker is actually wide enough for those roughly aimed launches.
Backward firing missles like in the Firefox movie.
is heli find drone, then drone is gone
I was thinking the same thing
Great work done, Ukrainian Drone army!
Awesome drones!! greetings from Buenos Aires, Argentina! slava ukraini!!!
I Love Argentina want to Visit that place some time .
Solução: Um míssil apontado para a frente, o outro apontado para trás.
I was guessing that Ukraine would have their drones armed. Great
Unity of people can always overcome an aggressor's resources.
по этому у украины нет шансов
@@3aTMeHuePa3yMa3 год уже слышим
@@Влад-ъ6у5р и бюджет украины более, чем на 60% зависит от кредитов))) и идёт смелое отступление и потеря территорий
@@Влад-ъ6у5р Зачем спешить . Бизнес
Ruzzia-kaput
А это ты про кого?Европа сдулась!Сша обосрались!Байден не может два слова связать!Вы смешны!😂😂😂
@@joining2023Трамп придёт вам п.и.з.д.а.
Aaw that make sense now THAT IS WHY THE U.S. LEFT TONS OF BILLIONS DOLLARS WORTH OF EQUIPMENT BEHIND IN AFGANISTAN.. BECUZ THE U.S. WERE USING THE MI-8 HELICOPTERS
New motions heat sensor missiles will the best for drones
Drones seek faces to kill
They need a swivel launch base so the drone boat does not have to manourve into firing position.
They need sort of like a naval wingman drone.
Helicopter goes after one. The wingman can maneuver to take out the other.
At least till they can figure something else out. Looks like they are fixing the kinks as it goes.
slava ukraine❤❤❤
This will be a great help in the Philippines we need 1 million like this to protect the country
US won't allow the proliferation of this weapon. Since it would threatening US Navy naval global dominance
@@pan2aja its a threat to everyone china india russai us nato, but of course to you people only the big bad usa is scared
we need a video about how the KORNET Missile works
отлично, их лучше будет видно и легче найти, наведение будет сразу демаскировать катер
Russia need to employee small boats with paddle guns. 3 to4 crew per boat. A gun boat in command with radar and commanding 10 small boats. And multiple groups like this. The same thing that Sri Lankans used in thir civil war.
They should mount one facing forward and one backward would be a good idea 😎
Don't use a sidewinder to much thrust use a man pad or JAGM
No doubt since this video things have moved on. In war like this it is always catch up time for either one side or the other.
Дякую за пітримку укрїни ви топ.
Always Welcome!
Great documentary!
1:40 God dam, that's a big helicopter
Yes
Magnificent 8
But the Russian’s didn’t use any helicopter mounted arms, they used a Russian sticking a AK out the door😂
you must be living under the rock. Watch the latest videos where Russia took out 15 naval drones.
@@DoubleFractals 2, with his door gunner
@@drgonzo305 конечно, всё так, и украина побеждает бежа назад, закрывая свои границы для мужчин и принудительной мобилизации, всё это говорит о скорой победе украины
Great explanation. Please do detailed information about the "scopes " in artillery and motors. Like how a scout is able to give enymy positions to the artillery/motor teams, and how they calibrate firing. And how sights on artillery really function. Bravo to your awesome classes.
well, it didn't work, but there is a submarine-launched sam missile made by some german company.
They did it
Some German company
Yea I’m so sure
Turkish unmanned marine vehicle ULAQ, which launches guided missiles, was produced in 2019.
@@toxichuman208 isnt turkey pro-russian but in nato
@@Alguien644they're pro nobody, they're only pro turkey.
какой фантасмагорический мультфильм для зрителей 5+ =)
If the Ukrainian builders aimed one frontal and one backwards the Helicopter would-be dead. They could also mount a rotatable missile turret. They are experts at developing drone upgrades.
Please make a video about the modified Dassault Falcon 50 codename "Susanna" used to strike the USS Stark ship.
Excellent news!
They should mount one of the missile facing backwards, so the helicopter cannot attack from behind.
No sense, in this case solid fuel engine will damage IR seeker of other missile.
@@four-dimensionalpersonput them on a turning mount then
exactly, a better idea would be to put an American AIM-9M on a launcher that can turn up and down 360 degrees. While firing a missile at a target above the drone would damage the drone, it would be a one-way mission anyway so that wouldn’t be that big of a problem, especially if they managed to shoot down a helicopter.
@@FreeRojava2025 turning mounts are heavy, even at it lightest configuration it a lot of space and weight required. That would shift the centre of gravity and complicate it production. Sometimes simple is best.
@@Kishanth.J yes. But it would also be good if they can hit the boats they are intended to
they hung up replicas of rockets and are making a news story out of it😂😂😂
We're getting ever so closer to building the real life Loochador from Just Cause 3.
That's just my favorite
La nave russa si dovrebbe posizionare fissa su un punto strategico protetta da mine e reti anti drone.. oltre agli elicotteri, non ci vuole un gran studio...
Do Make a video of INS vikrant
The American Navy must urgently come up with something to protect its vulnerable aircraft carriers
Hey not to be a nitpick but the tail rotor isn’t spinning on the mi 8 when you introduce it at the start. Not a big deal but just wanted to let you know
Спасибо
Yes but these rockets cannot be launched in reverse if the helicopters are chasing them .
The Ka-52 helicopter is called an alligator.
Karma. 1/3 of Russias Black Sea fleet is incapacipated
Было бы лучше скинуть ядерное оружие и это завершить быстрее как было сделано в Японии?
Украинский флот кстати весь потоплен🤷♂️
This is so cool! 😎👏
Thanks
interesting idea, but poor implementation. there is an opinion that the missile cannot see the target due to the target’s low altitude above the water. Helicopters do not fly high, while missiles have restrictions on the height of their use.
Missi gooool
Nice!
Boat looks like the swedish Navy combat boat 90
Wouldn't it be more useful if the missiles in the Magura were aiming backwards intead forwards??
I love this challen man
Ukraine conduct Sea operations in broad daylight, strapping rocket launchers to a sea drone! Thats a little far fetched! I did enjoy the cgi, top notch work! 😊
Look like Ukraine should point the missiles aft. The chopper are likely to chase the drones down. If the drones try to initiate the attack on the helicopter, they’ll give away their position.
It’s easier to use two anti-aircraft missile drones at a distance of 300 m from each other to cover blind spots.
Надо, чтобы наши западные противники столкнулись с таким оружием в Красном море. Хуситы, или ещё кто, друзей найти можно много, владелец доллара много кому навредил.
Это благоприятно скажется на развитие Северного Морского Пути в РФ.
can you talk about the F-22 Raptor please
I supposed those R-73 weren’t being used by the Ukrainian Air Force because of the lack of planes to shoot at. Might as well use what you have.
Show weapon bay and sonar of ka 27 helicopter
Hmm, don't like the design of that missile setup on that drone ship. They should have mounted one missile facing towards the stern for quicker response to helicopters approaching from the rear ... 🤔
Its unfortunate that the drones cant carry forward and rear facing missiles.
An R-73 can go at mach 2.5, which is more than double the speed of the sound, I think that the animations are kind of slow here, still love your videos though
Given that the heli's like chsing the drone, it would make sense to mount the missiles on swivelling mount, or more simples, just point one missile forward and one aft.
It’s easier to use two anti-aircraft missile drones at a distance of 300 m from each other to cover blind spots.
The first time I saw footage of the missile-equipped sea drones being attacked by helicopters, I noted that both missiles were pointed forward and wondered why. It was foreseeable that they'd be pursued and I thought it would have been a better design to have pointed one of the missiles aft. I'm guessing after this, future versions will do it that way.
Forward facing is equal to motor torpedo boat, as a second option if drone boat is hit. Vertical missiles amount to third option!
They’re guided missiles that track Heat signatures. It doesn’t really matter much which they they’re pointing.
@@GrahamCStrouse Heat seeking missiles have an acceptance angle in which they'll detect a heat signature. Ukraine appears to be using R-73s, which, depending on the version, can detect targets anywhere from plus or minus 40 degrees from center up to plus or minus 75 degrees. So you can't fire one forward and expect that it will see something that's at your rear. Which is good, lest it detects your own heat signature and comes after you.
Heat Seeking Moisture missiles?
Ukraine should be using its limited resources on the retreating frontline on the mainland and not wasting it on Crimea or the sea. Odesa will be taken from behind and not the sea.
What are you on about
@@FreeRojava2025if you look up the port city of Odesa on a map and where the Russians are advancing in the north & east of the Ukraine/Russian border. It will then make sense where tax payer money should be spent.
Easier for Russia to attack by land than via Crimea or the Black Sea. Crimea has been a lost cause since the civil war began 10 years ago in 2014.
The focus is on the wrong area and money Ukraine is begging for should be spent wisely and not wasted on pinpricks against Russian oil or naval fleet.
Did you create the voice you used in this video? Or are you taking the voice used in the video from a voice artist? please answers me🙏🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
more capable than side winder?... SOURCE TRUST ME BRO but what model?
Why R 73 can be launched from the surface? isn’t it an air to air missile?
NATO and the United States are looking at Ukraine's sea drone attack, more and more the United States and NATO is learning from Ukraine how to fight Russia and other countries with drone technology, when Ukraine gets up to speed with their own weapons manufacturing, they will be exporting to pretty much every country on the planet except for Russia China North Korea and Iran.
Use Wolf Pack Tactic For RSV Drone Fall of Russia Black Sea Fleet Sure
Sea Drone With 9K38 Igla The Best
R-73 can hit targets up to 15km altitude and 18km distance, targets like A-50 , igla have a range of only 2km , a helicopter canon can open fire from 3km with canon or from 10km with a anti tank missile.
is it possible to equip it a 360 degrees rotating missile launcher so that it could target the helicopter in every direction. could they use light weight missiles that are not only heat sinking but also anti radiation and could target the bridge as well?
why didn't they mount one of them backward?
About time.
please make a video how a umpk glide kit work, or a baba yaga drone vid
The model for the Raptor speedboat is not correct! That is the swedish CB-90.
Or submarines drones with guided missiles
Ukraine show them Russians what you can do you can do it better in Russian so show them you cannot they cannot stop you Ukraine I wish you thought about that earlier
Russia could have destroyed Ukraine's energy industry in the first month, plunging it into the Stone Age. But the trick is that she needs these territories along with cities and infrastructure. What I won't say about Poland, Romania or the Baltic states. Strikes by such drones are possible while there is a gray area. But Ukraine will definitely lose access to the sea, and if not, then the conflict will end for it another time with the loss of the coast.
All of your opinion.
If it was that easy to do they would have done it!!
Nice dreams
Womp womp
@@TOdoubledizzle24
He is stating the truth.
It IS that easy for Russia.
They have long range missiles since 1970s.
Russians can single handle destroy every single power plant and major bridges and dams in a week.
They chose not to do so for whatever reason and plans that they have in mind for Ukraine.
But according to me, that was Russia's biggest mistake in war.
You can't dream of living and planning for the land you haven't conquered yet.
😂😂😂Russia cant even take donbas😹😹👻
10 years gone
👍👍
where are the kronos vehicles? tey are the most advanced sea drones
Why don't they upgrade it into USD or Unmanned Submarine Drone?
essential of a drone is continious control. water acts as an insulator for radio waves that makes it really challanging. it should be much more autonomous than sea drones are currently. but there are some submarine drones projects
Please will you add transliteration or not?
The Yemeni Houthis have long learned to shoot down Saudi Arabian F-15s using an R-73 missile installed on the ground... They crossed a thermal imager with this missile! And yet, there is not a single confirmed victory of a Ukrainian drone over a Russian helicopter... So at the moment the system in this configuration is not effective against helicopters...
it was just first tries. also it will make helicopter pilots more anxious
THIS SEA DRONES ARE USELESS AGAINST RUSSIAN NAVY . A LOT OF THEM BEING DESTROYED BY RUSSIAN NAVY AND HELICOPTERS.
Job well done! Please, how do I join your team?? I have a nack for military and I've been covering it for long, I'm a script writer.
Can you do a video on the falcon 9
"Ukrainian" seadrones with heatseaker missiles :D
A joke almost as good as Houthi's hypersonic rocket.
How Admiral Gorshkov is best frigate in the world. 🙏Please make a video on this.
t mit deiner Kamera übersetzen
I'm sure it works with an Ohio-class submarine, or a small bridge like in North York or San Francisco. But you destroy it yourself like you did with the 911.
Sure
They tried and failed if you remember.
To begin with, these are not Ukrainian drones, but British ones. Well, one day patience will come to an end.
They show cartoon again and helicopters are excellent at destroying these boats...
👍😎🍺🍩🪖.
People need to see this
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
I hate AiTELLY on everything.. Other than that I love the videos
Noted but please tell Apple, Coco cola, Nike to remove their Logo and we will do the same
It’s necessary in today’s day and age. If he doesn’t some loser is gonna repost it and TikTok and not give credit
Страна,которая не то что машину,но даже велосипед,полностью свой уже выпустить не может... ,,изобрела супер технологические,,дроны,и сама их производит? Хоть что то на Украине делают для них? Ну насмешили...
with this kinda animation, u are insane
When will u make a vid from the abramsX
Video games
Next