LM Wind Power sets record for the world's longest wind turbine blade, again!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 มิ.ย. 2016
- We've shattered the size record again. Meet LM 88.4 P - the world's longest, most advanced, wind turbine blade. Learn more about this massive 88.4 meter component: www.lmwindpower.com/en/product...
- ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.77[1/2] ก็ไม่ได้ชอบเอาชนะ แต่เรื่องอะไรต้องแพ้!!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JraaBYOd7I0/mqdefault.jpg)
Wow! Excellent video and thanks so much for informing us about the complexities you have overcome. Well done!
What an amazing team you have. Everybody on it seems both brilliant, and compelled to give their best! A rare and wonderful collaboration, from which the whole human race benefits. Bravo!
Lies again? Hello Whatsapp
I really like your achievements, I hope I will be part of it someday.
I want to see it transported and then installed. Where is that video ?
Glad for subtitles...
Very good LM
The Adwen AD 8.4-180 run by Fraunhofer IWES is equipped with those blades.
"Hey Bill !"
"What ? "
"We need a bigger gate right here Bill :v "
It would be so interesting to see the transportation phase on the road... amazing, incredible, compliments.
Do they take their guiness world record award and hand it back to them.
"right, two more to go lads"
As a retired mechanical engineer, I'll be interested to see what the maximum size wind turbine is for the best economy of scale. I wish we had leadership in the U.S. with enough foresight to realize that the fossil fuel industry is the past and new green technologies are the future. We are handing the development and manufacturing of these new technologies to Europe, China and India by subsidizing the oil industry to the detriment of green energy technology. I fear we will pay a heavy price for this lack of a long term strategy.
RonKirk%) I took a vacation out west this summer, 2019. I saw many wind turbines and the blades being installed in South Dakota and Wyoming. The blades were being trucked on special design trailers and shipped by trains. Driving south through Indiana I saw over a thousand wind turbines operating. The USA government announced that wind generated electricity had just past coal produced electricity. I drove past through Gillette, WY in June of 2019 and saw the strip coal mines and the trains that carry the coal to market. Two weeks later it was announced that two of the strip mines closed. So, I believe USA is on the right track with wind generation, even though, Trump is a moron deriding the industry and by calling wind turbines, windmills (An old devise used to pump water and grind grain into flour.)
lol the music at the end
Why do great videos have subtitles
As someone who has worked on a wind project, trying to get this blade on site to be staged would be impossible in many situations. You could only do this off-shore.
The_Kind Panzer these blades are for off-shore
Offshore, where the environmental damage is even greater, and the infrasound travels farther and confuses intelligent sea-mammals.
sweet. but its only one blade needed or yall gotta make more for the client on this one?
I wonder where it is getting put up .
Eles poderiam injetar, sucessivamente, camadas de fibra e resina em um molde girando em alta velocidade, de modo que a força centrífuga faria todo o processo de conformação.
Já trabalhou disso ? Resina e camadas de fibra de vidro nos usamos muito Aki no brasil
Well use the lightnilng too for goodness snakes.
Have you tried vortex generators to improve blade-stall performance?
3:47 and 3:50 I think there was also another variety of VG but I forget where it showed up in the film.
My brother-in-law went into debt when they opened a massive power bill and made his own power. The right formula ended up being the Papziati Energy system online. It is the number 1 method to develop your own green energy. It is the very first thing which will pop up in Google.
🇧🇷sou reparador no Brasil
nearly as many managers as actual builders...lol
Super sir
Nice infomercial.
That thing would mount perfectly on my Rc airplane.
Dammit! And I thought the 57 and 60 meter blades was long. That thing will be hell on the road once they finally hit America.
At what size and at what price will carbon fiber replace fiberglass as a material for blades?
They are so big enough to kill wild turkeys on the ground and high flying vultures.
Now they Made the 107 Meter Blade for the haliade x
Thay now made a 107 Meter (351 foot) Blade.
Me got selected in this company campus interview I. Missed the opportunity so far
WHICH IS THE CONSTRUCCION MATERIAL FOR THE BLADE
These people seem smart yet they don’t know that you shouldn’t but white subtitles on a white background
Good
One of the most staggering things about these blades is the amount of physical non-biodegradable waste generated during their production, ie. cured resin, epoxy resin vacuum bagging material, waste fiber. Literally tons of landfill material per blade.
What’s the life span of one of these? We must find a way to recycle these materials for the future.
Kaynak Yavuz Ali bey
What are the secrets you pixelated out inside the factory?
Chris A Pictures of my reproductive system. They used it as inspiration for something which is at the same time very long and also very rigid.
Does the rain simulator account for debris like pollen, dust and insects hitting the edge at 150MPH over long periods?
Those turbine blades in the video are for offshore use.
Que droga !!!!!!
If the rotors are to be used off shore, then why didn't they choose to build the factory next to the sea? The blades could be transported with ease on specially built ships without the size being a problem.
You should put more of your research into molten salt reactors. You'd get a MUCH better yield of profit to cost.... And it's on all the time.
Wonder how many birds it will kill
we can transport the wind turbine blade
Please show us the whole turbine and not just one blade. (Although it's impressive...)
Are you impressed by nature's scenery at all? These things are shit-canning it, you know. The wind industry is no better than fracking, and generally a lot uglier.
Another name for "wind turbine blade" is "eagle smasher."
prosperomage probably it is. But it is wrong. Wind turbines account for less than 0.1% of all killed birds. But buildings (skyscrapers or office buildings) are at more than 50%.
+Geo T
Even when ignoring the fact that wind power is renewable and fracking isn't, it's still a lot better than fracking.
Fracking involves pumping carcinogene chemicals such as benzene & formaldehyde into the earth, causing seismic disturbances, water & air pollution and more.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_hydraulic_fracturing
EinChris75
Where is this factory located? So many accents and diversity of peoples It looks like it is somewhere and nowhere at the same time
why not use. dirigibles for transport the blades
How much?
Pffff in my town stands the biggest wind turbine prop of the world XD
You indicated that the blade cannot be transported on public roads. Well, why didn't you show how it is transported? I was waiting for that segment only to be disappointed.
Those blades are for offshore use. They will manufacture them close to a harbour.
Aside from the fact that this type of blade is a thing of the past, it seems to be another compensatory item to create one this large.
Put this rotor into the jetstream and we will never have problems with low energy again.
carbon fiber is amazing
Would it be an idea to build a giant 3D printer so that the blades can be printed on location?
No, the blades are very difficult to manufacture and consist of many different materials. It would be a nightmare to try to 3D print it.
+Frederik Jacobsen In reality, they are made of a thin hardening layer that includes styrene as the outside coat, and lot of fiber glass. That's it. The problem is that it's a craft. It's difficult to lay the fiberglass in the correct layers, lengths, positions and techniques without following the company's design. The layout would be to much for an 3d printer.
There is no way a 3d printer can print materials of that strength within the next years.
I'm always baffled by the lifetime limitation on these things -- 20 years. What is it that makes them no longer productive at 20 years??
Good clean energy
So, wtf is the point of making it so big? Does it get more efficient the bigger it is? I can only see it as more material fatigue and future problems for the turbine if there isn't any advantage to making it so big...
Recyclable ? made from natural resources ?
Hoist it up vertically by double rotor helicopter on a calm day 😃
How much enegery does it take to produce 1 blade?
They're carbon neutral in around 5 years I believe.
Never mind the actual blade, think of the steel tower and the concrete to keep it from toppling over. No matter what the heat source is, to get 112 kg from ferric oxide, you emit 66 kg of CO₂; likewise the quicklime needed for the concrete's cement requires the heat for the equation CaCO₃ => CaO + CO₂, which means that you need heat energy And the emission of 44 kg CO₂ to get 56 kg of quicklime, CaO
cool
seems like theyre compensating for something
wow, there's a lot of fossil fuel industry shills on here. game is over boys and girls. you're history.
bob cannell ha ha in your dreams... someone has to produce real energy so you can waist it on your fake feel good crap.
No there doesn't. Good preemptive strike comment though with faux justification. If this was on purpose your trolling is coming along nicely. A Solid 7.
@@ryanburbridge *waste
It is an error to imagine that wind power isn't a friend to the fossil power industry. Except where huge amounts of hydro are available, it utterly depends upon "spinning reserve" power from part-idling gas turbines.
why not make 3 shorter turbines would be much economical then 1 giant expensive turbine also can u imagine transportation and instalation cost? i think it never pays back since bearings dont last as long on that big 0
Within a year of installation, the cost of a wind turbine is paid back, both economically and in emissions.
It's also better to build one big 3 MW turbine instead of a couple of smaller 1 MW turbines.
It reaches higher up which means higher and steady wind speeds.
The material, the cost of installation and transportation is cheaper than what it would take to install three smaller turbines to enable the same power output.
It takes up a smaller piece of assembly area and less infrastructure in relation to how much three smaller turbines would collectively occupy.
A bigger turbines also means it will be easier for maintenance personnel to work inside, the small ones are really cramped in comparison, and the time for e.g. yearly service takes about the same time but would then be tripled because of the amount of turbines.
I know this because I've have for two years written papers and studied to work in this business and also work with servicing wind turbines.
Can we use them on an America,s cup boat as a sail? be pretty bloody cool Yeh!
modern devices capture the lightning and transfer it to the grid d'uh ! ! !
Why large turbines do not have lights at the hub, mid span and tip is nearly beyond my ability to imagine. Bird strikes are an issue. The lenses themselves can be incorporated into the airfoil section at any point. Given a span that large, the outer third of the blade could feature a variable pitch section.
house cats kill more birds than turbines do.
That would require more energy than they produce.
Flatter!!! Возможен аэродинамический флаттер не концах лопастей, вибрация и разрушение, сначала лопасти, потом всего остального...
Do they use wind turbines to power their own manufacturing plant ??..Just Asking !!
and the technology is 30 years behind the time ! ! !
ehhhh, only 3,4 m longer than Vestas V164..
Too bad it's too long to be moved in the states. They have a hard enough time moving 160ft blades.
An amazing combination of painstaking manual labor and the most expensive materials and technologies, then to entrust everything to the strength, character and mood of the wind. When you need more energy - more blades, more wind turbines, more money. Even in the car there is an accelerator pedal, in clean energy it is not accelerator pedal and this is a problem.
Carry it through the air with a number of industrial sized velocopters.
Everyone with a foreign accent. Where does the money go? What happens when there's no wind? What is the life span and cost of these turbines??
20 years
all that and you couldn't give us a demonstration of it in operation? that's lame guys
Yes i mist that part too. Still that blade thingy was big.
they do blades, not wind turbines...
my Honda Civic spoiler is bigger than that
How about vertical axis? They are safer and more effective.
The reasons why the VAWTs are not chosen are several, one is economics.
Fantastic but the expenses are greater than the return.
Especially the environmental expenses!
6 months (1hr for professional), and I spat out something that is final. Thrashed yas all.
I'm not genius but if you put a ball on some rails inside these huge wind turbine propellers will it create propetual motion or slow it down and create drag??? How about water ?.....
World's longest bird swatter.
2003 called and they want their outdated theory back. In 2019 we figured out that birds can actually see..... with their eyes!
Biden is gonna use these to fight wild fires 😂
Betz limit has been smashed and debunked by the Gyro wind turbine only 9'-6" in diameter with a power output of 13'-0 diameter turbine watch TH-cam video regards Graham Flowers
'
nice big long blade propeller...
but not need too long...
better cut off 1/3 size reduce
Euhm, Why would they cut it?
But you can harness more power with bigger blades on the right gearbox..
Tol istentotheseg uys isdificult.
Bird slayer, bringer of death.
In America 1/3 of a million bird deaths from wind turbines, 6.8 million from radio towers yet the domesticated cat kills 3.7 BILLION... All from the same report. So as you are so concerned for the birds, which one are you going to deal with first.
+Jamie Rollinson you’re absolutely right. We should ignore all bird deaths caused by windmills until pet owners get rid of their pets. Sounds like a plan.
the futurreee
This looks like balsa wood cored fiberglass 😲 at the point where they shove the blade out of the shed??? Wtf?!?
I love, love, love wind turbines....they recoup their production and installation costs very quickly and they last for decades. If I were President I would make it mandatory that all USA electricity would be generated by wind turbines by 2030.. Yes, it could be done. All it requires is the will of the people to do it.
They don’t recoup even a fraction of their cost and they don’t last long because they are constantly exposed to the elements which significantly increases their operating costs. The design is full of flaws. Not to mention they ruin the natural landscapes and cause major health problems. Overall the costs really out way the benefits. So go take your tree hugging good for nothing green energy bull shit and leave cause we don’t need pussies like you in this wonderful country.
Another giant unprofitable albatross that will kill an albatross.
Rocket science is far easier than climate modelling. As a matter of fact, building a wind device even as good as this one may be as difficult as designing a rocket.
But it is sadly misguided engineering cleverness.
It is devoted to an energy supply that amounts to begging in the street for your income.
That blade, once installed, has to be held in a single bearing that can rotate it on its own axis, to allow winds of a speed in excess of what gives the "turbine's" rating, to slip by without wrecking the entire device. The bearing has to be lubricated, and the wind-sensory apparatus very precise.
place them next to
Barbra Streisand house
No, I'm afraid it's not rocket science. Even rocket science is not rocket science anymore. This is just a quantitative step, and rocket science used to be about huge qualitative steps.
and the Indians build these for half the cost
thats half the skyline gone,shouldnt we be trying to make them smaller and more efficient
It´s offshore, so that point is irrelevant.
Why do you want them to be smaller? That only means more turbines to get the same output.
Within a year of installation, the cost of a wind turbine is paid back, both economically and in emissions.
It's better to build one big 8 MW turbine instead of a couple of smaller 1-2 MW turbines.
It reaches higher up which means higher and steady wind speeds.
The material, the cost of installation and transportation is cheaper than what it would take to install smaller turbines to enable the same power output.
It takes up a smaller piece of assembly area and less infrastructure in relation to how much smaller turbines would collectively occupy.
A bigger turbines also means it will be easier for maintenance personnel to work inside, the small ones are smaller and more cramped inside in comparison to a big one, and the time for e.g. yearly service takes about the same time but would then be multiplied because of the amount of turbines.
Bigger is more efficient than smaller ones.
This is a poor business strategy, need to put these on an assembly line and pump out 1000 blades an hour and I'd be impressed.
They're expensive things to fix, you can't get quality from pumping them out.
,
Why do great videos dub in lame-ass music?
why do people watch great videos and then there only critique is about music?
bravo!!!!!!
KIM ROLLO great music !Whats the name of this great song?Thanks in advance for your answer:-)