Get on the list: Subscribe to the Big Brains Insider newsletter for access to special behind-the-scenes content and get a bigger bite from every guest. eepurl.com/iiMiI5
This is a simple and concise factual explanation of why nations fail and I totally agree with it. Thank you Mr Robinson and BIG BRAINS. Although I must add that outside of this submissions by the authors, there are some deliberate efforts by some powerful imperialist and hegemones who internationally want to deter the development of some countries who aspire to have good institutions albeit ON THEIR OWN TERMS without interference however, fearing that their political and economic liberation is a threat to their economic, political and military dominance the imperialist and the hegemonic cables deliberately thwart their progress.
The question is: IS there a chance to all nations to be successful, or the successful nations to keep her success has to keep other nations unsuccessful by control their sources or have a big influence in their culture , i believe that the increased cap in technology between nations reduced the chance to any unsuccessful nation to recover or change the current status
More neo-Liberal economic rhetoric. Robinson claims that the failure of Nogales, Mexico is dew to its lack of political competition and democracy. Therefore, by implication, the success of Nogales, US is the consequence of political competition and democracy. The problem is the US has neither political competition nor democracy. Consequently, Robinson’s premise is faults. Hence, his conclusion is meaningless. Robinson's neo-Liberalism makes unacceptable, even unspeakable, the obvious difference: Imperialism. The US is an Imperial power. Mexico is not. End of story.
US has no political competition or democracy? You're just a fucking leftie in a developed country who feels guilt inside for her own standard of living, right?
@@MrFUCKINGINTERNET "just a fucking" brainwashed Rightie who has read nothing and knows nothing. Stick to your childish ad homonyms; you can then avoid thinking.
Get on the list: Subscribe to the Big Brains Insider newsletter for access to special behind-the-scenes content and get a bigger bite from every guest. eepurl.com/iiMiI5
This is a simple and concise factual explanation of why nations fail and I totally agree with it. Thank you Mr Robinson and BIG BRAINS.
Although I must add that outside of this submissions by the authors, there are some deliberate efforts by some powerful imperialist and hegemones who internationally want to deter the development of some countries who aspire to have good institutions albeit ON THEIR OWN TERMS without interference however, fearing that their political and economic liberation is a threat to their economic, political and military dominance the imperialist and the hegemonic cables deliberately thwart their progress.
Excellent🎉🎉🎉
The question is: IS there a chance to all nations to be successful, or the successful nations to keep her success has to keep other nations unsuccessful by control their sources or have a big influence in their culture , i believe that the increased cap in technology between nations reduced the chance to any unsuccessful nation to recover or change the current status
Unfortunatly no.
More neo-Liberal economic rhetoric. Robinson claims that the failure of Nogales, Mexico is dew to its lack of political competition and democracy. Therefore, by implication, the success of Nogales, US is the consequence of political competition and democracy. The problem is the US has neither political competition nor democracy. Consequently, Robinson’s premise is faults. Hence, his conclusion is meaningless.
Robinson's neo-Liberalism makes unacceptable, even unspeakable, the obvious difference: Imperialism. The US is an Imperial power. Mexico is not. End of story.
US has no political competition or democracy? You're just a fucking leftie in a developed country who feels guilt inside for her own standard of living, right?
@@MrFUCKINGINTERNET "just a fucking" brainwashed Rightie who has read nothing and knows nothing. Stick to your childish ad homonyms; you can then avoid thinking.
@@kort2436 You call braindwashed someone and at the same time you talk about imperialism and neo liberalism in 2020. The joke tells it self