$700 million upgrade hopes to fix one I-70 mountain bottleneck

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 61

  • @joemac1290
    @joemac1290 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I seriously DOUBT that they will complete this project. They would have to shut down half the I-70 corridor in order to start the construction. It would cause traffic bottlenecks from Idaho Springs all the way to West Arvada, and from Idaho Springs all the way to Silverthorn.

    • @aylahughes9185
      @aylahughes9185 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      lol then they will def do it. think about the world we live in rn. no one is passing up any opportunity to make the common man hopelessly inconvenienced.

    • @Squince01
      @Squince01 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dude this is going to be a mess! I guess I'll be staying off the 70 for the next TEN YEARS!

    • @neoanderson7492
      @neoanderson7492 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well they are working on so looks like you were wrong

  • @osvaldo554
    @osvaldo554 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Better put heaters on the roads. Bridges freeze before roads. And that looks like one long bridge .

  • @RIXRADvidz
    @RIXRADvidz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    And NO RAIL LINE all the car access you need, but no Mass Transit Options. a Bus Only lane would be nice, a Heavy Truck Lane would be nice. A Modern Rail Line Service to at least Frisco. such horrible short sightedness.

    • @joemac1290
      @joemac1290 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Ski slopes Owners dont want mass transit. It would bring homeless people to their backyard.

    • @Project2457official
      @Project2457official 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joemac1290 thank you for proving the original commenters point by reinforcing the ignorant american belief that "public transit is for homeless people"

    • @joemac1290
      @joemac1290 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Project2457official Walk to Union Station in Denver and get on ANY bus or rail. You will then understand. The Ski slopes DO NOT WANT homeless people moving from Denver to the tourist Ski areas. The Ski industry is a BILLION DOLLAR industry.

    • @Neely26tv
      @Neely26tv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They don't think like that they would rather spend a million dollars on a $300 ft tall cross then to actually spend the money on something that really serves a general-purpose for everyone

    • @GoogleSpyZon
      @GoogleSpyZon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@joemac1290 The ski industry can not exist with out snow, a simple ban on combustion vehicles in favor of alternative energy solves the problem and saves the planet

  • @Neely26tv
    @Neely26tv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    They say it'll take 5 years but end up taking 50

  • @user-sk5cv7hj2m
    @user-sk5cv7hj2m 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I live in Colorado and I could care less. I don’t think I should have to pay for that. Get the money from the ski resorts, weed and added cigarette tax. I’m tired of taking it in the ass because somebody wants a small stretch of road. Plus cdot never repairs all the roads that are already falling apart. CDOT is a dumpster fire!

    • @Squince01
      @Squince01 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I couldn't AGREE MORE!!

    • @gosnooky
      @gosnooky ปีที่แล้ว

      From experience, CDOT is not that bad compared to other state DOT's. I'm looking at you Caltrans.

    • @lithium25693
      @lithium25693 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why live on Colorado if you don't ski minus well move to Kansas

  • @PiersAnthony-hq7tj
    @PiersAnthony-hq7tj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    For 700 million you'd think they could drill through the mountain

    • @Neely26tv
      @Neely26tv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or at least use nuclear bombs to blow the mountains out of the way all together

    • @Squince01
      @Squince01 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This project will come in overbudget @ aprox $1.2B, Just wait.

  • @Project2457official
    @Project2457official 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Yeah no lets just add one more lane bro that will fix everything
    Actually lets add 3 or 5 new lanes bro. Trust me on this it will fix the bottleneck for at least a few months maybe a few years and then we'll have to squeeze the tax payers dry again after those couple of a few years for yet another decade delayed and overbudgeted highway project.

    • @povertyspec9651
      @povertyspec9651 ปีที่แล้ว

      Highways are the lifeblood of the economy. Not a single loaf of bread gets to your local grocery store by rail. 75% of cargo is transported by highway. Deal with it.

    • @cxsey8587
      @cxsey8587 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@povertyspec9651because we refuse to invest in rail infrastructure. It’s literally only like that bc we treat rail like the plague and sold almost all of our rail lines to private companies.

  • @idriveastationwagon1534
    @idriveastationwagon1534 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looks like something out of a need for speed map.

  • @lesliegibbons6917
    @lesliegibbons6917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Are the slopes paying for it? Probably not. What a waste of money. And here in eastern Colorado pot holes and roads so rough like driving on dirt. But polis and cdot don't give a damn. How much of the 700 mil goes to polis or his friends and relation?

    • @rudolf6547
      @rudolf6547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Good point. Let Vail Resorts pay for it, they create the traffic.

    • @rickj1983
      @rickj1983 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@rudolf6547 Seriously? Vail? Not all of it. You have Loveland, A Basin, Keystone, Breck, and Copper all just past it. Vail is still at quite a drive west.

    • @juliebofco9347
      @juliebofco9347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rickj1983 Correct! Not to mention all the people driving to the Western Slope. So many semis, too. They slow up the traffic, and add to the wear and tear.

    • @juliebofco9347
      @juliebofco9347 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rudolf6547 How much revenue do you think visitors to the ski areas bring to the state, besides the ski areas? Hotels, restaurants, retail, etc. When they were shut down during COVID it really hurt the economy.

  • @rndyh77
    @rndyh77 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, the westbound lanes will be pushed onto a north facing slope? That will constantly be iced up in the winter. And how are those expansion joints going to hold up and how are they going to prevent that viaduct from freezing up in the winter?

  • @neosho53059
    @neosho53059 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Leave east bound alone! Just add a extra lane west bound and merge at the bottom of the hill and make the bridge safer

  • @narule2695
    @narule2695 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hell ya more Taxes

  • @ScantPear
    @ScantPear ปีที่แล้ว

    That bridge seems fine to me… when I drive on it I pass over it just fine…

  • @Dave--gp1qx
    @Dave--gp1qx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They will add a westbound lane spending our tax dollars…and then, wait for it, they will require us to pay a toll to use that extra lane!😮

  • @af556
    @af556 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    DOUBLE DECKER ALL CONGESTED HIGHWAYS

  • @spikedpsycho2383
    @spikedpsycho2383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Doubt. Induced capacity nevervtrust a new road will solve congestion

    • @gosnooky
      @gosnooky ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Induced demand is for sure a thing. Look at these 20-lane freeways they're building in Texas... those roads are just as congested, if not more so than the 4-lane roads they replaced.

    • @povertyspec9651
      @povertyspec9651 ปีที่แล้ว

      If that was true, every road would be 100% congested 24/7/365.

    • @cxsey8587
      @cxsey8587 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@povertyspec9651not how it works, i recommend researching before spewing nonsense

  • @bmay282
    @bmay282 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who gets all the money? What are labor costs vs materials? Are workers going to be paid well? Are we taking a loan against our taxes for this? How much profit was allowed? Where does the profit go, is it kept in the community or does it go to outside companies? Not enough info in this report.

    • @PiersAnthony-hq7tj
      @PiersAnthony-hq7tj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That Man is asking too many questions..
      PUT HIM UP AGAINST A WALL

    • @rickj1983
      @rickj1983 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm sure much of it is federal money. The state can't afford a project like this on their own.

    • @joemac1290
      @joemac1290 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I seriously DOUBT that they will complete this project. They would have to shut down half the I-70 corridor in order to start the construction. It would cause traffic bottlenecks from Idaho Springs all the way to West Arvada, and from Idaho Springs all the way to Silverthorn.

    • @bmay282
      @bmay282 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, it's the "Build Back Better" program coming to our great state... But remember what happened to the PPP money? Most of the money was stolen by the businesses when it was supposed to go to the people...and almost no one has been accountable for that. If they steal this money too, what other shot are we going to have to rebuild our infrastructure??? We have to keep an eye on this.. so many of our cities have toxic levels of lead in the water, can any of the money go to fix that so we can all have drinkable H2O????

  • @johnmcquaide9896
    @johnmcquaide9896 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    “It’s scary so I drive 40” You’re part of the problem lady. Stay off the road.

  • @Dark_side9999
    @Dark_side9999 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This wont fixed the traffic. The main problem is not the road, it is the population increase => the amount of cars on the road to the resorts. We need a system to transport people to the resort without using their own cars. Train is out of the question, it is too expensive. Adding toll lane wont make a dent. A snowtang can eliminate 20-40 cars, think about it. Right now snowtang only start from 1 location, increase it to every lightrail parking lot with hundreds of them working on the weekends. problem solve

  • @DeanZimmerman-rt6gh
    @DeanZimmerman-rt6gh 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😎

  • @higgsboson3356
    @higgsboson3356 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Take notes from Spain on how to design Interstates with dedicated lanes.

  • @stevewillis1916
    @stevewillis1916 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    NOOOOOOOO NOOOOOOOOOO. Oh god

  • @ReDdfasky
    @ReDdfasky ปีที่แล้ว

    . Insurrectible

  • @waltercunningham4892
    @waltercunningham4892 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yall will do anything but build a train

  • @Aikynbreusov
    @Aikynbreusov ปีที่แล้ว

    5 year project????? 5 years for that small repair of tbe I-70????? Just hire the chinese to do it...... !!!!!!

  • @GoogleSpyZon
    @GoogleSpyZon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Colorado should be preserving nature and combating climate change, clean public transportation that runs on alternative green energy and a ban on combustion vehicles will solve this and save the planet.

  • @trappking8626
    @trappking8626 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Waste of taxpayers money

  • @anthonysears871
    @anthonysears871 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just another waste. Easy solution! Ration fuel! Ratiin travel! Live in front range? Made your beds!

  • @AlexZ-lc6nl
    @AlexZ-lc6nl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Having lived in this state now for some time and having seen the wonderful and competent job they do here in Colorado with Infrastructure, im sure this project will be nothing less than a 20 year built of expensively mediocre road extensions that will fail in some way or another within months of completions and will look as if they were 100 years old by 5 years after completion. 😂. Colorful Colorado 🫠🫠🫠