I sailed this boat twice to Fiji and round NZ with the original owner. This article fails to mention during the refit they changed the main sheet from being through a captive winch is going to the arch you can see in the old photo. The traveller tore out of the deck. The boat has had a refit and is sailing again with the mainsheet back on this arch. She's a wonderful boat
2 men were killed. One by the boom and one overboard. I met the boatbuild in NZ who was lost overboard and we were making the same passage a few days ahead. This was a horrific tale. We lead our preventor to the cockpit and rig it on a winch so it can be released quickly. We also keep watch in the cockpit at all times. I don't understand why when the hydrolic autopilot failed someone in the cockpit did not hand steer. I am sailing a 67 footer from St. Martin to Euorpe next spring. This is a good reminder of how big the forces on a large boat can be.
From another video, I was able to understand that the failure of the hydraulic autopilot was such that it required a bypass to be activated in order to hand steer. The wrecking ball of a traveler had already destroyed the binnacle and wheel, also destroying the electronic controls for the autopilot and the wheel itself.
@@JheregJAB Maybe. I am only going from memory and that was from eight or nine years ago. I thought that boat had duel wheels. And most hydrolic autopilots require power to close the valves off to run the autopilot. A failure and or a power shut off should have made the helm completly released. That was a performance boat so it is possible it had hydrolic steering, but I would not bet on it. Still, power off should have been fail safe return to manual steering. In the fog an emergency at sea, a lot of simple things usually go wrong to add up to a major catastrophe.
Excellent tip to inspect and even possibly reevaluate my preventer set up. Maybe you’ve seen my comments before about scuttling boats after abandoning them, this is a perfect example. The vessel was taking on water, and left afloat, later to be found. This is often the case. Charts show “hazards to navigation” It’s part of their job, but vessels abandoned and left afloat are not on charts and just as dangerous as a charted rock. Thanks again for the great vid!
I have always taken care with my preventer and avoided down wind sailing in conditions where I should be ashore. However I had a rigging failure on my Catalina 42 a couple of years ago that was very much like a uncontrolled gybe. I was sailing open ocean off of Long Island on a beam reach with 20 knot winds. Suddenly the main sheet block released from the traveler car when the shackle broke. The boom slammed over 90 degrees with a huge bang and the rig shuddered. I was able to recover with some temporary dyneema line to hold the main on the traveler. The 5/6" shackle that connected the main sheet block to the traveler had broken. There was a corroded crack on the inside where it could not be seen from an inspection. Frequent rig inspections are essential for safety and peace of mind.
Now that is something that is totally unforeseeable. Running on a beam reach in 20kn winds is no cause to reef, I certainly wouldn't have been worried in your situation, and completely surprised if something like that happened. I'm glad you were able to get it under control quickly without injury or damage to your boat. Good work.
Two additional points should be noted. First, as pointed out in the report, the preventer should be rigged from the END of the boom to the bow to produce the best possible geometry and thus the lowest loads on the line. Platino’s preventer rig probably put at least 2x as much load on the line as a better rigged one would have. (IIRC, the preventer was also compromised by the knot in the line, which can greatly reduce its breaking strength. And the padeye it was attached to was inadequate as well.) Second, the very common placement of the traveler in a position near positions normally occupied by crew leads to the “wrecking ball” scenario the befell Platino. A much safer design places the mainsheet somewhere outside the cockpit, for instance on an arch (as is common on Beneteaus).
I have a 62ft sailboat with inboom furling and have lived a similar situation. 8hrs at 40+ knots with big waves. The problem with in-boom is that you cannot reef or take down the sail in such situation, so had full mainsail. I would have never trusted the autopilot in such conditions and hand-steered the whole time. It was intense. As a rule I also never use the autopilot at deep angles for the risk of jibing. This experience was so bad that I right after replaced the boom with a normal one, with reefs and all.
Terrible situation for those involved … it’s a story for every boater to learn from … systems malfunction and break. #boats For night passages: have a protocol to reduce sail area early despite the forecast… I’ll add… I replaced the “brains” of my autopilot last year. I had a couple of instances of random course deviation (turning 30° or more degrees). Spooky … in my experience boating is a blast until it’s scary and life threatening… be as careful and safe as you can. Appreciate you sharing the story. Heartbreaking to hear loss of life 😢
I don't mean any disrespect to the captain and the decisions. I wasn't sailing and I know I am in a safe arm chair. For learning purposes, I would want to ask the question: why did they keep the mainsail up when the wind increased?
@@symphonyfarm2009 it’s a big boat, it can take the wind. The initial failure point was the autopilot. A better question would be, why did they continue to rely on the autopilot? Unless they couldn’t spare the manpower, that would be the real sticking point because apparently they jibed multiple times.
@@TheCornucopiaProject-bd5jk I agree, after the first gybe, I would think they would have immediately disconnected the AP and steered by hand and once on a beam reach reefed the main or completely furled it. I wouldn’t trust an AP on a long passage with the wind almost dead down. Especially if it had issues earlier.
There was no reason to drop it prior to the autopilot failure and the initial gybe. They would have obviously reefed it and wanted to make progress. After the autopilot failed and caused the initial gybe, nobody could get to any of the controls. Remember the boom was flailing around with the main sheet and traveller track torn off the hull so nobody could get to the wheel or the halyard releases. It was flying around like a mace. Horrible situation. A local from Bayswater was the guy lost overboard. RIP Steve!
There is a common theme among many of the incidents we were having in the last 2 decades. The boat was on autopilot. I learned, and this was many years ago, that in inclement weather and especially downwind, boats should be hand-steered, even if that is often tough on the crew. Autopilots do fail, but the real problem is the thing they can not do. Anticipating and reacting to circumstances seconds in advance. Humans are much superior in that regard. We have a feel for the boat, the autopilot does not.
Agreed. Although not in severe conditions, but a bit breezy, I had a situation on a broad reach, where battery voltage dropped to a level that switched off the electrics. Autopilot was locked in place with a breakwater not too far off and I had no rudder control. Unable to head up even after rolling the Genoa, I dropped the anchor and the boat came round. Had I not been in the cockpit, it would have been a disaster. Also realized afterwards that I could have removed the pin between the autopilot and rudder, but that would have meant going down below to get at it. Manufacturer checked out the below deck autopilot later and could find nothing wrong.
Hand steering on an ocean passage with a short handed crew is simply not an option. And if it is to be insisted on, then an awful lot less boats will be going to sea. How about you search the accident report online (entering SV Platino into any search engine will find it) and then READ it. Rather than making absurd comments on social media.
Hand steering a big boat with hydraulic steering often gives zero feel or feedback so you end up always behind. We lost our auto pilot a day into a 9 day passage. We lasted an hour and realised there was no way of going on so we turned back. You don't know until you try
@@russellkbell, not really, not with those on the market at present, although it would probably be possible to engineer one. However most people with the money (and ego) for a 65’ cruising boat are always going to go for electronic/hydraulic autopilots.
What happens if we lead the preventer to a mid-ship cleat, block, or pad eye, and, in fact, the Platino tragedy was partially due to doing just that. A proper preventer is rigged only one way: from the boom end to as far forward as you can get it on the bow and then back to a winch in the cockpit. It is all about physics; for example, a proper preventer would be about 1200 pounds (540 kg) against some 7,000 pounds (3300 kg) or more on an amidships attached alternative! Of course, on a smaller boat, the loads will be lower, but the strength of the gear will be lower, too, so the dangers will remain. I have seen numerous booms broken from preventers set from mid-boom to mid-rail
Another excellent video and explanation of how, when in doubt and if you are out there with no choice but to keep going, have a preventer set up at the ready.
It’s amazing that theres a similar story on a large sailing boat from Bermuda to Canada. 60+foot boat, boom furling and a good crew 2 deaths. And the failure was the preventer. Thanks for the report
Can i ask with all the years of experience from you tim an all the people on this channel. What is that list of maintenance checks the need to be performed, daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly an yearly? As a newbie i think this list would be valuable
I guess the lesson is that if it’s part of the boat it needs to be inspected. On small boats we can often catch things by a quick glance, but the proper way is to have a check list and use it meticulously. It becomes part of the log book. What would you put on a preseason, mid season and end of season checklist ?
So sorry the loss of life. There was a similar case of a 60 plus ft sailboat sailing from Bermuda to Canada and two people lost their lives. The best way to rig a preventer is from the end of the boom to a block on the bow and back to the cockpit. I am not sure If that set up would make a difference in this case because of the weight of the inboom system and the massive loads involved.
Thank you for this report and especially all the good posts below...I am so very sorry for these poor people. And I am angry at the senseless loss. Having a 74-year-old’s lifetime of sailing, continuing on my ’38 sloop, I have 4 points I can’t help but try to make: 1. Autohelms are great tools for light conditions. I turn it off as soon as I notice the system laboring as conditions turn even slightly heavier because in my experience the increased stress and wear will just break it, its failure most prone in the worst of conditions and usually at night. 2. Any autohelm with the possibility of limiting the rudder movement after it fails, let alone locking it up, is not an autohelm, it’s a death wish, as useful as a headless captain or a Tesla driver who loves to brag about his self-driving (coal) car. 3. Never use the main in 20kt+, come about to the wind and douse her, then headsail only, and as the old maxim says, reefed before you barely even think “maybe I should be reefed”, and disengage that autohelm so it doesn’t get a chance to show you its sinister dark side(s). 4. Consider first taking a hike through the countryside with your potential crew. If they are the fitness type and show up with all the gear, tech and fashion who then hike focused on high performance to get to the finish, avoid them as crew. That mindset is deadly when sailing for many reasons.
The load on a preventer can be massive, particularly when compared to a mainsheet, as it’s typically on a much shorter lever arm from the gooseneck, e.g 2:1 ratio. Something to bear in mind. Thanks for this informative and regrettably very sad video. A tragedy for all.
Any rock climber will tell you that a knot is the weakest point in a line. Even a Figure 8 knot which is one of the best for minimising lost strength will reduce tensile strength 35%. And a shock load is orders of magnitude higher than a static load. That's why climbers only use static ropes for top-rope climbing and always dynamic (stretching) ropes for lead climbs. And knots jamb. How can you release a line when it has a knot that can't run through gear? Get a longer rope. Clearly lines on a yacht are just as much life-and-death as they are for climbers.
On a brand new 1979 Irwin Citation 39 half way between Montauk and block the rudder tube broke away from the inside of the hull. I still had steerage but we were taking water on faster than the electric pump could handle it. Fortunately the seas were calm we moved weight and bodies to the bow, manned the whale and motored to block.
I beg to differ on the "qualified crew" assertions. If you're operating in 35-40 knot winds, you should not be running via auto pilot and you should have sail area reduced to the extent that an accidental jibe will not destroy the rigging. With inexperienced, low skilled captains and crew aboard "push button" yachts, the likelihood of major system failure skyrockets in high wind conditions because the push buttons serve to insulate the operators from the reality of the stresses that are involved. When hands are turning a large winch instead of electric or hydraulic motors, the forces involved and consequences of losing control of those forces become front and center - they can't be ignored or underestimated. This is why the larger the vessel, the more strict and stringent are the qualification requirements for licensing the operators/crew and the more strict the adherence to operational protocol. Qualified, experienced people know that you can't rely solely on auto pilots, instrumentation, and automated systems to maintain control of a vessel in harsh conditions. Harsh conditions require constant, vigilant oversight and hands-on control. They require prudent planning and continual adjustments to suit conditions - keeping the loads on equipment well within specified design criteria. Multiple high force jibes in rapid succession screams total loss of control and no sailing vessel can withstand a situation with too much sail out in high winds with uncontrolled jibes. Catastrophic failures are almost always a result of multiple layers of human error. From the details of this case, it appears to be a textbook example of multiple stages of human error compounded on one another.
I agree. In those weather conditions with 3-4 m waves running up on you one should not be on autopilot. An autopilot can not anticipate the kick a running up wave gives to the stern, and can only react with a delay that results in oversteering. At some point it must go wrong, either by autopilot failure or worse, accidental jibing. There is nothing wrong with having an adequately reefed main sail and preventer when running downwind, but so many people rely too much on the preventer. If backed in strong enough winds, it will snap and the boom will come across. A skilled helmsman is key in these situations. And you need more than one helmsman to run shifts, because helming in those conditions requires skill, concentration and is tiring.
@@PaulBKal I'm only going by what the video above said - "35-40 knot winds" and "2 meter waves". Whatever the wind and gusts were, I suspect they were significantly higher than 15 knots - otherwise the mast and rigging would still be standing. Get a clue.😅
@@PaulBKal Practical sailor just said in this video, that the winds increased from 20 to 30 and then gusting to 48 knots before the preventor snapped. Watch the video.
@@topherdean1024 & @cjg6364, my apologies, I’ve since re-read the report. (www.iims.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Maritime-NZ-Platino-Accident-Final-Report-2018_07.pdf) I had been under the impression the wind built strongly after the involuntary gybe. Another matter here is apparent wind v true when going downwind in big boats. I’ve certainly been very surprised by how strong the wind is when we stop going downwind on big boats. However these guys were pretty experienced, but as the report indicates, way too casual about safety. But that’s just sort of the way things were back then. The biggest changes to marine safety all came about in response to catastrophes like this one, the ‘79 Fastnet and the ‘98 Hobart.
A terrible situation and my condolences to those involved. I only use a preventer in light air with a forcast that ensures that doesn't change. I have been on three yachts that experienced bad accidental jibes where the mainsheet traveler blew apart. It was amazing that there were no injuries to any of the crew. Also, in a regatta, my friend rigged a preventer and in heavy air, an accidental jibe ripped off the boom at the gooseneck from the mast like a can opener. That was only one accidental jibe. Based on my experiences, I use a boom brake now. I also dont trust any autopilot. I named mine H.A.L.( 2001 Space Odyssey) While sailing from Tortola, BVI to NY, N.Y. Every time we though we could get some rest, the autopilot ( which worked while my eyes were open) turned against us and would brooch the boat. We had to hand steer all the way short handed. Would I do it again? Yes! "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." Thank you for your video!
I'm with you on the boom brake. I guess it goes back to all my years in judo with the philosophy that you "give way' to an opponent rather that opposing strength with strength- and that's for a human not Poseidon! Plus that the boat simply will heave-to on the opposite tack, something I'd much rather wake up to than a broach.
Add the following: Bad line, resulting bad hardware, higher chops, sun setting, strained crew. Sailing as a pleasure cruiser, or a Laser racer, can be very stressful at times. This is a motorsailer, which means it should have been relatively safe, having both options. It's a tough but relatively slower vessel.
32 years and thousands of miles of blue water sailing and never did I experience jamming with my in mast main furling system when I. was trying to roll the sail in. Twice I experienced jamming when trying to roll it out. On both occasions the jam occurred when less than 3 feet of sail had been unfurled. On both occasions the jam was due to sail fatigue at the very head of the sail which caused it to fold over on itself and jam. While not 63 foot boat a Hans Christian 48T is a good sized vessel which displaces 50,000 pound. Her boom could be carried by a man and a small boy; its weight was only a few hundred pounds. Further, in mast furling, if rigged correctly, allows one person to set and furl the main, while at the helm, in the safety of the cockpit. Every in boom set up I've look at, including one manufacture's video, requires 2 people to use it effectively. The small sacrifice of not having battens is far off-set by the safety and ease of use of an in mast system.
I agree. this hatred towards furling mainsails is not just stupid, it is dangerous. First, most modern sails can have good shape even in an in mast furling system. So you do not loose really speed. Second and more importantly, it is a lot safer in most conditions. You do not have to leave your position and can be done by one person. And can be done in an emergency a lot faster and safer. I think a traditional sail jams a lot more often as the forces on those sliding thingies are most of the time not in the direction such system can handle. Also gets dirty easily, etc.
In my 50 years of sailing I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve helped other sailors fix their in-mast or in-boom furling systems. It would be in the dozens. Never once, however, have I ever had to assist other yachties fix their slab reefing systems. Never once have I had a problem with slab reefing that couldn’t be fixed in a few minutes and with minimal disruption. My experience with in-mast furling isn’t extensive but it did seem to work alright on any boat I was aboard, but I could not say the same for in-boom furling, but both seem to be a massively unnecessary complication of a very simple system.
As a mainsail trimmer on many grand prix racing boats I had a visceral dislike of in mast furling. However, the vessel I bought for family cruising already had it and I discovered two main advantages; it is so easy to reef that you do it when you should do it, and you have "infinite" reefing, so can dial in exactly the right amount of sail for the given conditions (including down to trysail size). Taken together these points mean the vessel remains under complete control while moving through the gears as conditions change. As far as reliability is concerned, I've never had any issues, and remember that in the 1980's Dodge Morgan sailed solo around the world through the Southern Ocean on his American Promise, as Hood 60(?) with in mast furling, proving its reliability.
@@sailingaqualibra4848, yeah, not sure it was that reliable. It’s been a while since I read his account but my recollection is that he did have some dramas with his main furler, but they occurred mid ocean and not in high wind situations and he was able to sort them out.
Not sure if their system was the same but when our hydraulic steering system burst a line the rudder goes to one side and will not come back until the ram is removed. This causes the yacht to circle. It takes time to remove the back mattress to access the ram and remove it. we then need to but the emergency steering in place. The boat could easily do multiple passes through the wind before we get control of the boat again. There are many systems where there's a lot more than just disconnecting an auto pilot to regain control.
I had a C&C 25 (kept on a mooring) that had her forward cleat let go on a not particularly rough day (winds were only 10-15 knts but gusting to about 20) with the mooring in a very sheltered area with negligible current. Got a call from the harbor master said my boat was up in the mud. The stainless bolts that had been holding the cleat had corroded into nothing inside the deck, because stainles does weird things in an anoxic environment. Nothing else was damaged and we stuck her back on the mooring facing the wrong way as it were until I got a chance to get at it properly. Boat was fairly new to me but very far from new, however showin all the signs of having previously been very well cared for.
11/23 I have about 120,000 miles under the keel. Some thoughts * Using an auto pilot in heavy down wind never a good idea. * Using a boom break that eases an accidentally jib is a better boom break. * No one should have been on the deck without a harness in high winds. * Once the boat lost steering, someone should have taken the wheel and pointed the boat into the wind. Capt Peter A Luciano
Actually I cannot understand why the mainsail was deployed in those conditions. It should have been furled away or heavily reefed. They had two head sails and it would have been safer and given them better control of the boat if they had just used one of those instead..
@@GrampalettasCampWell perhaps having an in-boom sail gave them a sense of security that I don’t have with an in mast sail. With an in-mast sail you are more aware of the potential problems of trying to furl a sail going down wind in rising conditions so you reef very early but with in-boom perhaps it is not so much of an issue?
Peter Read the story, some of your points were not applicable at all! Fields of problems: - Just for me: I hate in furling booms, too heavy - The equipment was not tested in shake down test trips (preventer, AP) - The crew was not drilled - The main was not furled in, for these conditions the inner staysail is plenty of power without any risk of damage in the cockpit area. - and some more
Condolences to the families of those who were lost and all respect to the captain and crew. I think one thing omitted from this video is a conversation about sails for the conditions. Downwind sailing with a main sail in heavy winds and a confused sea state doesn't seem to the best alternative, especially with a rig as heavy as the one on this boat. It's easy to second guess the captain but wouldn't a single headsail have been more appropriate?
Emergency tiller, do you have one, do you know how to use it, is it accessible, is all necessary gear available for immediate use? Most will answer “no” but like the preventer, when needed will probably not be convenient. Be prepared!
Lots of armchair experts commenting here criticising the crew. My understanding is that the initial gybe, caused by the failure of the autopilot, tore off the whole mainsheet traveller, which aligned with the wheel and all the halyards and other controls. So the traveller and blocks and a considerable length of mainsheet was flailing around like the spiked ball on a mace. And in an arc that swiped over the cockpit and controls. So there was no way to get the boat under control until the boom damaged the backstay and the mast came down. It was a truly horrible situation. RIP Steve and the other chap who I didn’t know.
My cruiser has a 20 foot, 200 lb boom. I have preventers rigged from the anchor well all the way back to winches in the cockpit. I actually rig both preventers anytime I rig one (which sounds stupid). It saved my ass last winter going down the coast of Baja when the winds doubled and reversed in direction in seconds. We jibed three times in less than 60 seconds at like 2:00AM. The extra preventer gave us another point to assist getting her under control. Luckily, the only damage was nerves! I don't know all the details of this event, but nobody ever gets into sailing to die. It is however like many exciting outdoors "things" in that it has some inherent risk. I like to jokingly say " nobody ever got hurt sitting on a couch with their remote control".
Agreed. However, statistically, I bet more deaths are caused by sitting on your couch with your remote control. Heart attacks are the leading cause of death. Much safer to get outdoors and have a wild and exciting life. I'm glad I did. 💙
My friend was sailing the same passage that day and the conditions were very challenging, They heard the rescue over the radio. On their yacht they were 4 crew, 2 up 2 down and because the sea state was so rough, they did not use autopilot and sailed manually. He credits this with saving his life. To give some context a solo sailor who arrived in a 20m yacht the next day had been holed up for 2 days and gave up sailing because of it. The sea North of NZ is large, both in depth and weather. So you can expect things to change even if you aim to leave in good conditions.
Here's the thing: solo handling a 20 metre sailing yacht is insanely risky once conditions deteriorate and / or things go wrong. The forces involved just become overwhelming, and the experience turns into a nightmare. If that chap had, say, a 10 metre yacht instead, he might still be sailing and enjoying it. The current egotistical trend of "the bigger the better" is leading many people astray.
@@sauter1he wasn’t solo sailing, there was a crew of 4 with huge experience between them. But I do take your point about the ego involved in huge boats. If you and your wife want to go cruising extensively, a 12-14 metre boat is really all you need and can manage safely. If you want a 20 metre boat, you’re going to need crew all the time. And lots of them.
This reminds me of the accident on the CNB 66 Escape a few yeas ago. Large boom swinging. I never use a preventer, I have yet to see one not fail and cause problems. In large swell / strong winds from behind I hand steer if I have the main up, or if it is so strong that I don't trust not to do an accidental gybe (Or I'm just cruising) I'll sail with just the furling headsail / genoa / jib. Keeps the boat tracking better anyway and is plenty of sail area. These large furning booms are lethal when swinging and the fact that areas where they can hit you are not marked with large yellow do not step signs is a dangerous omission for aesthetics.
Boom brake + preventer is the only way to be able to sail downwind with absolutely no worries nada 🙀 so sad to hear this tale of what could have been "prevented"
Canvis over head is something I do know about. But not on a boat, cutting away and redeploying is a second chance to get where you are going in the condition you expected. Why then on the largeest boats and in the worst wind the users can not in a single stroke cut away the canvis? Or even eject the whole rig? Is it a issue of cost. Things can be replaced if still alive. Great Video.
I have a question. The crew must have been looking at weather forecasts. They must have seen a possible increase in wind speeds. Why didn't they put in a reef? Also, after the preventor failed and discovering that the steering had locked up, I guess my first thought would be to dowse the main. They must have had the halyard accessible in the cockpit. Is there some reason I'm not thinking of for not doing that?
In my 75 years of offshore sailing I have found mid boom preventers on a 40+Ft vessel are a recipe for a broken boom in heavy air. The forward preventer is ideal, provided it is a continuous line not in parts. If these guys had done a preventer drill before leaving the dock, this might have been preventable(pun intended).
All of the problems were compounded by the fact no safety protocols were established at the beginning of the Voyage meaning it took far too long to record the position of the man overboard and despite the plane being in position 20 minutes after the eventual transmission of man overboard they were now too far away to find or recover the person last seen waving to the boat
That boatyard fire pictured in the video was in Mattapoisett, MA. Has nothing to do with this yacht. I know because my 40' sloop was on the hard right in front of the burning build on the right a week before the fire! Boat is fine. My car? Not so much.
Wow sorry to hear about the car! Glad the boat is okay. It's hard to find pictures so I've noticed most people use this particular picture when explaining a boat yard fire.
Physics sadly won again. RIP, but that huge boom going out of control is terrifying.. Btw, thanks for making people aware of Australian \NZ's remote conditions. Crossing the Tasman Sea is serious business, up north of NZ is empty as for a while too. _As I'm sure you know, CL, who thinks $750k - $1m is a "typical price," had another direct go at you. The criticism missed the whole point imo. Cheers Tim._ 🇦🇺 ⚓
Being clonked on the head by an out of control boom is very much the same experience, whether it has a furling system in it or not. As described here, the issue appears to be that the system they had for controlling the boom was simply inadequate. For me, the mere fact that the line they hoped to use as a preventer not being long enough indicates that they failed to prepare adequately to go to sea. With an adequate line and system, the additional weight of a furler should easily be accounted for. To the point of irrelevance. It wasn't the booms fault or even the autopilot. As with Escape (which several others have mentioned in the comments) the operation of the vessel and preparation for the voyage are what appear to be the most significant factors into why trouble, became disaster. Not a particular piece of kit, configuration of equipment or design of the vessel.
If the boom had a furler why not reduce sail area to limit forces (is the mainstay mostly for 'reaching' into the wind direction or for maximum down wind propulsion) ? Isn't that a basic maneuver when sailing (maybe the furler would have required controlled manual handling, wonder if the mainstay could have been pulled down in a conventional set up) ?
Not a fan of in boom furling for that reason, too much potential energy. Also, when rigging a preventer, I route the line through mid cleats, and bring the line back to the cockpit, securing it at smaller aft winch.
Frog in boiling water scenario. As far as the preventer goes, there's nothing conclusive in this video about how it was rigged on Platino. For all we can tell, it was properly rigged to the bow and back to the cockpit with sufficient line. That said, some riggers do recommend a weak link in the preventer to let go in case the boat gets pinned on an opposite tack. I am not of that school. RIP sailors
I've never used a preventer but that might just be because of the type of boats I have always sailed on. Of course I don't want the boom suddenly swinging the cross taking people by surprise but I also don't want to have it stuck in a terrible position. Wouldn't a boom brake have been a much better solution? If the main had been allowed to come across slowly, the boat may have ended up in a Hove to position. Seems to me there may be more to the story. Okay the autopilot breaks and the boat goes into an uncontrolled gybe, but what then? They could not get hands on the wheel? Also, why are there no Jack lines rigged? Those should be visible in those photos. So sad for the loss of life.
Crew often get annoyed by my constant verbal outbursts when sailing downwind. If anyone goes forward, I announce the old Rick Derringer song from the ‘80’s- “Boom, Boom, out go the lights”. Just as a verbal reminder of what can happen due to a lack of awareness.⛵️
I understand why boom-furling is better for sail shape, but this "huge boom let loose" is also what happened to S/V Escape (google "anatomy of a tragedy at sea"). To me it seems that in mast furling is better. We all worry about the risk of jamming and not being able to lower the sail, but the massive booms of in-boom furlers seems to be what is killing people and sinking ships.
@@artsmith103 I'm not sure I follow you. Just like Platino the huge boom jibed and killed someone. How would a traveler have changed things, it was the mainsheet that killed the man on SV Escape. But, details aside, I haven't read any stories about people dying because their sail got stuck in the mast, but there are now two about very well built boats with in-boom furling where the boom got loose and killed people. Without the in-boom furling, the preventer line and hardware need not be as strong. I'm not an engineer, but I tend to think having all that weight moving around is just a bad idea.
@ovidiusnaso602 I sailed 2 trailer sailers that started without travelers. I made something of a bridle for the first one and installed a proper traveler on the 2nd. Going downwind without a traveler just adds problems.
perhaps a lever or pull-pin that disengages clew/foot halyard brake when boom extends past its short leash in wrong direction. Rapid de-powering is only solution to crash gybe forces [that must be stopped quickly b4 spreaders]
The condition seems to rough for the discipline of the skipper, that’s the time at least the Main comes down. Just not acceptable to join lines on a critical item like a preventer. Had the skilled helmsmen been at the wheel, my orders in these condition, that autopilot is being disengaged and I’d be calling for help, steering vessel around until up wind so that the main can drop, dumping genoa sheet, engine starting to gain control, that instantaneous, just had a serious event. SCREAMING, stay low out of possible swinging boom. But lets get to basic, if this was at night, there is no chance I’ll ever have full main up at night, 35kt winds and I’d never sail down wind with main up, 35kt winds down wind, and I’ll maybe be on 3rd reef or smaller with engine running to ensure I don’t have any wash over the transom. But now its happened….you as skipper take the helm, Commission technical skills to check on auto pilot. And if it serviceable, I will only sail with auto pilot in the dark..does not mean I’m not observant, such high winds, following seas, and just experienced a serious heart pumping event. Assign inspection duties to ensure vessel is safe and yes, you are all on harness clipped in. Quick crew count. Nobody is going foreword without serious light on deck and most experienced person that I know will not make a mistake or it can wait and by now, I’m heading downwind with engine running 2200rpm and I’ll need a response from my navigator, scan forward, is the AIS and Radar showing safe passage, are we in deep water, and what’s the prediction for weather, waves…….please notify vessels in the area of our situation and possible emergency. By now we should be in control and I’d look to hand the helm to my second and commence my safety checks, start by ensuring all the crew are calm and understand to be on alert. Scan question our emergency procedures, once I’m sure all the risks have been addressed, double up on the watch and I will stay up until daylight and conditions have subsided. How does the crew on such an expensive vessel not know to expect nasty conditions, its common to have Starlink onboard now and see weather other than the odd squall that the radar can detect and worsen condition alert you too.
Though the report on SV Platinos at page 53 under subsection Command and Control the damning conclusion comes to light despite this somewhat insincere tech heavy video. Quote: 'No emergency drills, or any other safety training specific to the yacht and its equipment was carried out with the crew at any time. - No emergency procedures were developed and documented. - No specific safety briefing was given. - No standing orders were issued and no requirements were stated for safe practices on the yacht (--report develop the failures in detail, my comment--) - No log book was kept. - No written watch roster was provided. The owners relied on the knowledge and experience of each individual crewmember. It was assumed that they all possessed the required expertise to effectively use the equipment onboard and respond to an emergency.' End Quote. That last part is the closest the report get to issue manslaughter by criminal negligence.
I don’t think you need to be quite so harsh mate. With the exception of the log book issue, you are judging yesterday’s events by today’s standards. It is largely because of the Platino incident back in 2016, that sailors now routinely have written procedures etc. I sailed for probably 25 years before I ever received or participated in a safety briefing or even a man overboard drill. And that came after another terrible disaster, the 1998 Sydney to Hobart Race. In fact NZ instituted its very strong laws about vessel safety as a consequence of the Platino incident. Initially, they almost bankrupted their marine industry because foreign yacht stopped coming to NZ. In Australia we were the great beneficiary of the NZ changes until they wound the rules back a bit and foreign yacht went back to NZ, but in the meantime many of their marine workers came to Australia. And many have stayed!
That is a great point there. I looked it up and there seems even to be a biased wording by the investigators. You rarely find such diverted wording in reports done by ordinary prosecuting criminal investigators.
A preventer is one of the most important safety lines on a boat, and should be the same spec as the main sheet. If it's not long enough, get a longer one! I've had two accidental gybes in light airs, no more! Oh, and my instructor was at the helm a few years ago and intentionally gybed with the main sheet too slack and nearly took the coach roof out - quality.
I’m not a sailor. Can someone explain to me how a crew can be hit by the boom: in my mind, it is about 10 feet above the cockpit on a 60 foot… isn’t it? Thanks.
One possible scenario: Even with a furler (especially in boom) it is wise/standard to get crew up at the mast to have eyes on, that the sail is furling correctly. If it isn't, it could cause a jam and make it impossible to reef the sail. The crew can indicate an issue, stop the process, adjust/guide the sail back to the correct position and then furling can continue. Whilst up by the boom, you are obviously susceptible to getting clobbered if it swings violently.
So sad the loss of life in this incident. I wonder why when their steering failed they didn't disconnect the hydraulic rams from the rudder quadrant to regain control of the boat. Controlling the boom would of course been the most urgent action, but obviously if they could have steered to a beam reach the jibing would have ceased. My Morgan 44 has a pair of stout rams, but they are easy to disconnect (of course I've never had to disconnect them in a heavy sea!) Failing that, they could have cut the hydraulic hoses thereby draining the fluid and regaining helm control.
Inspect all you want. The problem was money. People get high on it and they get high fallutin and insulated. Some people don't like furling sails. I don't. Now put the furled sail and hardware on a boom and control it flimsy, and automate a gigantic boat with a kooky autopilot and you have a mess. Add a bunch of Sohos, who don't have the common sense to disconnect the swaying boom at the mast, and drop it on the deck. You don't stand in the way of a train. You don't stand in the way of a boom, especially a freaky design that weighs double. I wonder how many goofy boats the designer has built and if he stopped.
I purchased a boom brake but have not fitted it as it requires some additional blocks to be fitted to the boat. It might be time to do something about it. However I have a 55 foot boat with in-mast sails and when going off shore (Crossing Biscay for example) I avoid sailing down wind with the main above a F4. If there is more than a F4 the Genoa is big enough to drive the boat and I can always let it go. The advantage of my boat is that the boom is above head height to the crew are safe in the event of a gybe but, better to avoid that in the first place. Lastly with a 66 foot boat I don't know why they didn't fit a Lewmar Mamba autopilot. They are built like tanks and I have never heard of one failing.
Sorry, how many times jibed the boat acccidential? One time can happen, ok if the autopilot did by fault two times. But where was the Skipper to take manually control on a safe course? Oh Man this should not happen. Think about the lost member 😢
Everyone is discussing how to best rig preventers, the merits of in boom furling or not, etc. Perfectly legitimate, of course. But here's a different take: how about not being a megalomaniac and not going for a massive boat with a massive rig that requires power assisted everything, and instead choose a more modestly sized boat wih much simpler and lighter gear, that you actually have a hope of controlling should the excrement hit the cooling device? Just my 2 cents. :)
there is no way the boom weighs 1500 pounds. The sail likely weighs 150-200 pounds and the boom 300-400 maximum. You are saying it weighs 3/4 of a ton, that just can not be right. Where did you get this number? They entire rig does not weigh 1500 pounds.
Hmmmm...I am not sure that his 1500 pounds is 100% correct. BUT it was 26' long with what would probably be an enormous cross section, add in the very large furling hardware, fasteners, large blocks, line, it would not surprise me much if that number was correct. We are dealing with a very large vessel with corresponding loads to be dealt with. Cheers Mike 🇨🇦
@greenfeilds...1 yeah I know it seems pretty high but the thickness of that boom section is likely 3/8" or even more due to the stresses it is handling. I suspect a 26' boom of those dimensions (maybe 16" × 16" - it is a main furler) likely weighs 500 - 600lbs bare. So yes the 1500 pound guess might be high but likely not by much. Cheers Mike
@@randyadams958 a 24ft long 1 inch thick 24 inch wide sheet of aluminum weighs a bit less than 700 pounds. I’m being generous as to the amount of material. Their number is just not correct. Mistakes are made it happens. It’s just wrong
I sailed this boat twice to Fiji and round NZ with the original owner. This article fails to mention during the refit they changed the main sheet from being through a captive winch is going to the arch you can see in the old photo. The traveller tore out of the deck. The boat has had a refit and is sailing again with the mainsheet back on this arch. She's a wonderful boat
2 men were killed. One by the boom and one overboard. I met the boatbuild in NZ who was lost overboard and we were making the same passage a few days ahead. This was a horrific tale. We lead our preventor to the cockpit and rig it on a winch so it can be released quickly. We also keep watch in the cockpit at all times. I don't understand why when the hydrolic autopilot failed someone in the cockpit did not hand steer. I am sailing a 67 footer from St. Martin to Euorpe next spring. This is a good reminder of how big the forces on a large boat can be.
From another video, I was able to understand that the failure of the hydraulic autopilot was such that it required a bypass to be activated in order to hand steer. The wrecking ball of a traveler had already destroyed the binnacle and wheel, also destroying the electronic controls for the autopilot and the wheel itself.
@@JheregJAB Maybe. I am only going from memory and that was from eight or nine years ago. I thought that boat had duel wheels. And most hydrolic autopilots require power to close the valves off to run the autopilot. A failure and or a power shut off should have made the helm completly released. That was a performance boat so it is possible it had hydrolic steering, but I would not bet on it. Still, power off should have been fail safe return to manual steering. In the fog an emergency at sea, a lot of simple things usually go wrong to add up to a major catastrophe.
Excellent tip to inspect and even possibly reevaluate my preventer set up. Maybe you’ve seen my comments before about scuttling boats after abandoning them, this is a perfect example. The vessel was taking on water, and left afloat, later to be found. This is often the case. Charts show “hazards to navigation” It’s part of their job, but vessels abandoned and left afloat are not on charts and just as dangerous as a charted rock. Thanks again for the great vid!
I have always taken care with my preventer and avoided down wind sailing in conditions where I should be ashore. However I had a rigging failure on my Catalina 42 a couple of years ago that was very much like a uncontrolled gybe. I was sailing open ocean off of Long Island on a beam reach with 20 knot winds. Suddenly the main sheet block released from the traveler car when the shackle broke. The boom slammed over 90 degrees with a huge bang and the rig shuddered. I was able to recover with some temporary dyneema line to hold the main on the traveler. The 5/6" shackle that connected the main sheet block to the traveler had broken. There was a corroded crack on the inside where it could not be seen from an inspection. Frequent rig inspections are essential for safety and peace of mind.
WOW!!! Well done on saving it! And good advice!
Now that is something that is totally unforeseeable. Running on a beam reach in 20kn winds is no cause to reef, I certainly wouldn't have been worried in your situation, and completely surprised if something like that happened. I'm glad you were able to get it under control quickly without injury or damage to your boat. Good work.
Dang crevice corrosion. Sneaky crap. Gave me a keel bolt headache one time.
Two additional points should be noted. First, as pointed out in the report, the preventer should be rigged from the END of the boom to the bow to produce the best possible geometry and thus the lowest loads on the line. Platino’s preventer rig probably put at least 2x as much load on the line as a better rigged one would have. (IIRC, the preventer was also compromised by the knot in the line, which can greatly reduce its breaking strength. And the padeye it was attached to was inadequate as well.) Second, the very common placement of the traveler in a position near positions normally occupied by crew leads to the “wrecking ball” scenario the befell Platino. A much safer design places the mainsheet somewhere outside the cockpit, for instance on an arch (as is common on Beneteaus).
I have a 62ft sailboat with inboom furling and have lived a similar situation. 8hrs at 40+ knots with big waves. The problem with in-boom is that you cannot reef or take down the sail in such situation, so had full mainsail. I would have never trusted the autopilot in such conditions and hand-steered the whole time. It was intense. As a rule I also never use the autopilot at deep angles for the risk of jibing. This experience was so bad that I right after replaced the boom with a normal one, with reefs and all.
I didn’t know you could not reef a boom furling main. Why?
Terrible situation for those involved … it’s a story for every boater to learn from … systems malfunction and break. #boats
For night passages: have a protocol to reduce sail area early despite the forecast…
I’ll add… I replaced the “brains” of my autopilot last year. I had a couple of instances of random course deviation (turning 30° or more degrees). Spooky … in my experience boating is a blast until it’s scary and life threatening… be as careful and safe as you can.
Appreciate you sharing the story. Heartbreaking to hear loss of life 😢
I don't mean any disrespect to the captain and the decisions. I wasn't sailing and I know I am in a safe arm chair. For learning purposes, I would want to ask the question: why did they keep the mainsail up when the wind increased?
@@symphonyfarm2009 it’s a big boat, it can take the wind. The initial failure point was the autopilot.
A better question would be, why did they continue to rely on the autopilot? Unless they couldn’t spare the manpower, that would be the real sticking point because apparently they jibed multiple times.
@@TheCornucopiaProject-bd5jk
I agree, after the first gybe, I would think they would have immediately disconnected the AP and steered by hand and once on a beam reach reefed the main or completely furled it. I wouldn’t trust an AP on a long passage with the wind almost dead down. Especially if it had issues earlier.
There was no reason to drop it prior to the autopilot failure and the initial gybe. They would have obviously reefed it and wanted to make progress. After the autopilot failed and caused the initial gybe, nobody could get to any of the controls. Remember the boom was flailing around with the main sheet and traveller track torn off the hull so nobody could get to the wheel or the halyard releases. It was flying around like a mace. Horrible situation. A local from Bayswater was the guy lost overboard. RIP Steve!
@@grahambarton1942 35 knot winds. No reason to drop it?
@@TheCornucopiaProject-bd5jkread the report of the accident inquiry board
There is a common theme among many of the incidents we were having in the last 2 decades. The boat was on autopilot. I learned, and this was many years ago, that in inclement weather and especially downwind, boats should be hand-steered, even if that is often tough on the crew. Autopilots do fail, but the real problem is the thing they can not do. Anticipating and reacting to circumstances seconds in advance. Humans are much superior in that regard. We have a feel for the boat, the autopilot does not.
Agreed. Although not in severe conditions, but a bit breezy, I had a situation on a broad reach, where battery voltage dropped to a level that switched off the electrics. Autopilot was locked in place with a breakwater not too far off and I had no rudder control. Unable to head up even after rolling the Genoa, I dropped the anchor and the boat came round. Had I not been in the cockpit, it would have been a disaster. Also realized afterwards that I could have removed the pin between the autopilot and rudder, but that would have meant going down below to get at it. Manufacturer checked out the below deck autopilot later and could find nothing wrong.
Hand steering on an ocean passage with a short handed crew is simply not an option. And if it is to be insisted on, then an awful lot less boats will be going to sea. How about you search the accident report online (entering SV Platino into any search engine will find it) and then READ it. Rather than making absurd comments on social media.
Hand steering a big boat with hydraulic steering often gives zero feel or feedback so you end up always behind. We lost our auto pilot a day into a 9 day passage. We lasted an hour and realised there was no way of going on so we turned back. You don't know until you try
Would it be possible to equip a yacht this size with wind-vane self-steering, either as the primary or backup ?
@@russellkbell, not really, not with those on the market at present, although it would probably be possible to engineer one. However most people with the money (and ego) for a 65’ cruising boat are always going to go for electronic/hydraulic autopilots.
What happens if we lead the preventer to a mid-ship cleat, block, or pad eye, and, in fact, the Platino tragedy was partially due to doing just that. A proper preventer is rigged only one way: from the boom end to as far forward as you can get it on the bow and then back to a winch in the cockpit. It is all about physics; for example, a proper preventer would be about 1200 pounds (540 kg) against some 7,000 pounds (3300 kg) or more on an amidships attached alternative! Of course, on a smaller boat, the loads will be lower, but the strength of the gear will be lower, too, so the dangers will remain. I have seen numerous booms broken from preventers set from mid-boom to mid-rail
Another excellent video and explanation of how, when in doubt and if you are out there with no choice but to keep going, have a preventer set up at the ready.
It’s amazing that theres a similar story on a large sailing boat from Bermuda to Canada. 60+foot boat, boom furling and a good crew 2 deaths. And the failure was the preventer.
Thanks for the report
Ive tried reaching out to you both through lady k and through your Patreon. I hope you received the emails. It’s been a while
Love your work and knowledge
For all of us who has been sailing long enough know if it's going to go wrong its in the middle of the night.Take all precaution after sun down
Strange that.
Can i ask with all the years of experience from you tim an all the people on this channel. What is that list of maintenance checks the need to be performed, daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly an yearly? As a newbie i think this list would be valuable
I guess the lesson is that if it’s part of the boat it needs to be inspected.
On small boats we can often catch things by a quick glance, but the proper way is to have a check list and use it meticulously. It becomes part of the log book.
What would you put on a preseason, mid season and end of season checklist ?
Excellent video and precaution alerts. Thanks for sharing.
So sorry the loss of life. There was a similar case of a 60 plus ft sailboat sailing from Bermuda to Canada and two people lost their lives. The best way to rig a preventer is from the end of the boom to a block on the bow and back to the cockpit. I am not sure If that set up would make a difference in this case because of the weight of the inboom system and the massive loads involved.
Thank you for this report and especially all the good posts below...I am so very sorry for these poor people. And I am angry at the senseless loss. Having a 74-year-old’s lifetime of sailing, continuing on my ’38 sloop, I have 4 points I can’t help but try to make:
1. Autohelms are great tools for light conditions. I turn it off as soon as I notice the system laboring as conditions turn even slightly heavier because in my experience the increased stress and wear will just break it, its failure most prone in the worst of conditions and usually at night.
2. Any autohelm with the possibility of limiting the rudder movement after it fails, let alone locking it up, is not an autohelm, it’s a death wish, as useful as a headless captain or a Tesla driver who loves to brag about his self-driving (coal) car.
3. Never use the main in 20kt+, come about to the wind and douse her, then headsail only, and as the old maxim says, reefed before you barely even think “maybe I should be reefed”, and disengage that autohelm so it doesn’t get a chance to show you its sinister dark side(s).
4. Consider first taking a hike through the countryside with your potential crew. If they are the fitness type and show up with all the gear, tech and fashion who then hike focused on high performance to get to the finish, avoid them as crew. That mindset is deadly when sailing for many reasons.
The load on a preventer can be massive, particularly when compared to a mainsheet, as it’s typically on a much shorter lever arm from the gooseneck, e.g 2:1 ratio. Something to bear in mind. Thanks for this informative and regrettably very sad video. A tragedy for all.
Any rock climber will tell you that a knot is the weakest point in a line. Even a Figure 8 knot which is one of the best for minimising lost strength will reduce tensile strength 35%.
And a shock load is orders of magnitude higher than a static load.
That's why climbers only use static ropes for top-rope climbing and always dynamic (stretching) ropes for lead climbs.
And knots jamb. How can you release a line when it has a knot that can't run through gear? Get a longer rope.
Clearly lines on a yacht are just as much life-and-death as they are for climbers.
On a brand new 1979 Irwin Citation 39 half way between Montauk and block the rudder tube broke away from the inside of the hull. I still had steerage but we were taking water on faster than the electric pump could handle it. Fortunately the seas were calm we moved weight and bodies to the bow, manned the whale and motored to block.
I beg to differ on the "qualified crew" assertions. If you're operating in 35-40 knot winds, you should not be running via auto pilot and you should have sail area reduced to the extent that an accidental jibe will not destroy the rigging. With inexperienced, low skilled captains and crew aboard "push button" yachts, the likelihood of major system failure skyrockets in high wind conditions because the push buttons serve to insulate the operators from the reality of the stresses that are involved. When hands are turning a large winch instead of electric or hydraulic motors, the forces involved and consequences of losing control of those forces become front and center - they can't be ignored or underestimated. This is why the larger the vessel, the more strict and stringent are the qualification requirements for licensing the operators/crew and the more strict the adherence to operational protocol. Qualified, experienced people know that you can't rely solely on auto pilots, instrumentation, and automated systems to maintain control of a vessel in harsh conditions. Harsh conditions require constant, vigilant oversight and hands-on control. They require prudent planning and continual adjustments to suit conditions - keeping the loads on equipment well within specified design criteria. Multiple high force jibes in rapid succession screams total loss of control and no sailing vessel can withstand a situation with too much sail out in high winds with uncontrolled jibes. Catastrophic failures are almost always a result of multiple layers of human error. From the details of this case, it appears to be a textbook example of multiple stages of human error compounded on one another.
I agree. In those weather conditions with 3-4 m waves running up on you one should not be on autopilot. An autopilot can not anticipate the kick a running up wave gives to the stern, and can only react with a delay that results in oversteering. At some point it must go wrong, either by autopilot failure or worse, accidental jibing. There is nothing wrong with having an adequately reefed main sail and preventer when running downwind, but so many people rely too much on the preventer. If backed in strong enough winds, it will snap and the boom will come across. A skilled helmsman is key in these situations. And you need more than one helmsman to run shifts, because helming in those conditions requires skill, concentration and is tiring.
@@PaulBKal I'm only going by what the video above said - "35-40 knot winds" and "2 meter waves". Whatever the wind and gusts were, I suspect they were significantly higher than 15 knots - otherwise the mast and rigging would still be standing. Get a clue.😅
@@PaulBKal Practical sailor just said in this video, that the winds increased from 20 to 30 and then gusting to 48 knots before the preventor snapped. Watch the video.
@@topherdean1024 & @cjg6364, my apologies, I’ve since re-read the report. (www.iims.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Maritime-NZ-Platino-Accident-Final-Report-2018_07.pdf)
I had been under the impression the wind built strongly after the involuntary gybe. Another matter here is apparent wind v true when going downwind in big boats. I’ve certainly been very surprised by how strong the wind is when we stop going downwind on big boats. However these guys were pretty experienced, but as the report indicates, way too casual about safety. But that’s just sort of the way things were back then. The biggest changes to marine safety all came about in response to catastrophes like this one, the ‘79 Fastnet and the ‘98 Hobart.
A terrible situation and my condolences to those involved. I only use a preventer in light air with a forcast that ensures that doesn't change.
I have been on three yachts that experienced bad accidental jibes where the mainsheet traveler blew apart. It was amazing that there were no injuries to any of the crew. Also, in a regatta, my friend rigged a preventer and in heavy air, an accidental jibe ripped off the boom at the gooseneck from the mast like a can opener. That was only one accidental jibe. Based on my experiences, I use a boom brake now. I also dont trust any autopilot. I named mine H.A.L.( 2001 Space Odyssey) While sailing from Tortola, BVI to NY, N.Y. Every time we though we could get some rest, the autopilot ( which worked while my eyes were open) turned against us and would brooch the boat. We had to hand steer all the way short handed.
Would I do it again? Yes!
"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times."
Thank you for your video!
I'm with you on the boom brake. I guess it goes back to all my years in judo with the philosophy that you "give way' to an opponent rather that opposing strength with strength- and that's for a human not Poseidon! Plus that the boat simply will heave-to on the opposite tack, something I'd much rather wake up to than a broach.
Add the following: Bad line, resulting bad hardware, higher chops, sun setting, strained crew. Sailing as a pleasure cruiser, or a Laser racer, can be very stressful at times. This is a motorsailer, which means it should have been relatively safe, having both options. It's a tough but relatively slower vessel.
32 years and thousands of miles of blue water sailing and never did I experience jamming with my in mast main furling system when I. was trying to roll the sail in. Twice I experienced jamming when trying to roll it out. On both occasions the jam occurred when less than 3 feet of sail had been unfurled. On both occasions the jam was due to sail fatigue at the very head of the sail which caused it to fold over on itself and jam. While not 63 foot boat a Hans Christian 48T is a good sized vessel which displaces 50,000 pound. Her boom could be carried by a man and a small boy; its weight was only a few hundred pounds. Further, in mast furling, if rigged correctly, allows one person to set and furl the main, while at the helm, in the safety of the cockpit. Every in boom set up I've look at, including one manufacture's video, requires 2 people to use it effectively. The small sacrifice of not having battens is far off-set by the safety and ease of use of an in mast system.
I agree. this hatred towards furling mainsails is not just stupid, it is dangerous.
First, most modern sails can have good shape even in an in mast furling system. So you do not loose really speed.
Second and more importantly, it is a lot safer in most conditions. You do not have to leave your position and can be done by one person. And can be done in an emergency a lot faster and safer.
I think a traditional sail jams a lot more often as the forces on those sliding thingies are most of the time not in the direction such system can handle. Also gets dirty easily, etc.
In my 50 years of sailing I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve helped other sailors fix their in-mast or in-boom furling systems. It would be in the dozens. Never once, however, have I ever had to assist other yachties fix their slab reefing systems.
Never once have I had a problem with slab reefing that couldn’t be fixed in a few minutes and with minimal disruption. My experience with in-mast furling isn’t extensive but it did seem to work alright on any boat I was aboard, but I could not say the same for in-boom furling, but both seem to be a massively unnecessary complication of a very simple system.
@@PaulBKalmy experience as well. Have on several occasions had to help with boom or mast reefing systems, but never with slab systems.
As a mainsail trimmer on many grand prix racing boats I had a visceral dislike of in mast furling. However, the vessel I bought for family cruising already had it and I discovered two main advantages; it is so easy to reef that you do it when you should do it, and you have "infinite" reefing, so can dial in exactly the right amount of sail for the given conditions (including down to trysail size). Taken together these points mean the vessel remains under complete control while moving through the gears as conditions change. As far as reliability is concerned, I've never had any issues, and remember that in the 1980's Dodge Morgan sailed solo around the world through the Southern Ocean on his American Promise, as Hood 60(?) with in mast furling, proving its reliability.
@@sailingaqualibra4848, yeah, not sure it was that reliable. It’s been a while since I read his account but my recollection is that he did have some dramas with his main furler, but they occurred mid ocean and not in high wind situations and he was able to sort them out.
Not sure if their system was the same but when our hydraulic steering system burst a line the rudder goes to one side and will not come back until the ram is removed. This causes the yacht to circle. It takes time to remove the back mattress to access the ram and remove it. we then need to but the emergency steering in place. The boat could easily do multiple passes through the wind before we get control of the boat again. There are many systems where there's a lot more than just disconnecting an auto pilot to regain control.
I've been on 48' and 50'. If big is necessary, I don't understand bigger than that. And I prefer 37-42'. A little smaller for coastal cruising.
I had a C&C 25 (kept on a mooring) that had her forward cleat let go on a not particularly rough day (winds were only 10-15 knts but gusting to about 20) with the mooring in a very sheltered area with negligible current. Got a call from the harbor master said my boat was up in the mud. The stainless bolts that had been holding the cleat had corroded into nothing inside the deck, because stainles does weird things in an anoxic environment.
Nothing else was damaged and we stuck her back on the mooring facing the wrong way as it were until I got a chance to get at it properly.
Boat was fairly new to me but very far from new, however showin all the signs of having previously been very well cared for.
Very good commentary - the Catastrophic Chain of Events that escalate, like this case, is every Captains worst nightmare.
11/23
I have about 120,000 miles under the keel. Some thoughts
* Using an auto pilot in heavy down wind never a good idea.
* Using a boom break that eases an accidentally jib is a better boom break.
* No one should have been on the deck without a harness in high winds.
* Once the boat lost steering, someone should have taken the wheel and pointed the boat into the wind.
Capt Peter A Luciano
The quadrant was locked by the inoperable autopilot ram. No manual steering was possible.
Actually I cannot understand why the mainsail was deployed in those conditions. It should have been furled away or heavily reefed. They had two head sails and it would have been safer and given them better control of the boat if they had just used one of those instead..
@@paulreading8980I was going to say the same thing
@@GrampalettasCampWell perhaps having an in-boom sail gave them a sense of security that I don’t have with an in mast sail. With an in-mast sail you are more aware of the potential problems of trying to furl a sail going down wind in rising conditions so you reef very early but with in-boom perhaps it is not so much of an issue?
Peter
Read the story, some of your points were not applicable at all!
Fields of problems:
- Just for me: I hate in furling booms, too heavy
- The equipment was not tested in shake down test trips (preventer, AP)
- The crew was not drilled
- The main was not furled in, for these conditions the inner staysail is plenty of power without any risk of damage in the cockpit area.
- and some more
Condolences to the families of those who were lost and all respect to the captain and crew. I think one thing omitted from this video is a conversation about sails for the conditions. Downwind sailing with a main sail in heavy winds and a confused sea state doesn't seem to the best alternative, especially with a rig as heavy as the one on this boat. It's easy to second guess the captain but wouldn't a single headsail have been more appropriate?
Emergency tiller, do you have one, do you know how to use it, is it accessible, is all necessary gear available for immediate use? Most will answer “no” but like the preventer, when needed will probably not be convenient. Be prepared!
Lots of armchair experts commenting here criticising the crew. My understanding is that the initial gybe, caused by the failure of the autopilot, tore off the whole mainsheet traveller, which aligned with the wheel and all the halyards and other controls. So the traveller and blocks and a considerable length of mainsheet was flailing around like the spiked ball on a mace. And in an arc that swiped over the cockpit and controls. So there was no way to get the boat under control until the boom damaged the backstay and the mast came down. It was a truly horrible situation. RIP Steve and the other chap who I didn’t know.
Exactly. And why is it so hard for people to search out the accident report and read it before pontificating here!
Excellent reminders !
Outstanding episode!
My cruiser has a 20 foot, 200 lb boom. I have preventers rigged from the anchor well all the way back to winches in the cockpit. I actually rig both preventers anytime I rig one (which sounds stupid). It saved my ass last winter going down the coast of Baja when the winds doubled and reversed in direction in seconds. We jibed three times in less than 60 seconds at like 2:00AM. The extra preventer gave us another point to assist getting her under control. Luckily, the only damage was nerves! I don't know all the details of this event, but nobody ever gets into sailing to die. It is however like many exciting outdoors "things" in that it has some inherent risk. I like to jokingly say " nobody ever got hurt sitting on a couch with their remote control".
Agreed. However, statistically, I bet more deaths are caused by sitting on your couch with your remote control. Heart attacks are the leading cause of death. Much safer to get outdoors and have a wild and exciting life. I'm glad I did. 💙
My friend was sailing the same passage that day and the conditions were very challenging, They heard the rescue over the radio. On their yacht they were 4 crew, 2 up 2 down and because the sea state was so rough, they did not use autopilot and sailed manually. He credits this with saving his life. To give some context a solo sailor who arrived in a 20m yacht the next day had been holed up for 2 days and gave up sailing because of it. The sea North of NZ is large, both in depth and weather. So you can expect things to change even if you aim to leave in good conditions.
Here's the thing: solo handling a 20 metre sailing yacht is insanely risky once conditions deteriorate and / or things go wrong. The forces involved just become overwhelming, and the experience turns into a nightmare. If that chap had, say, a 10 metre yacht instead, he might still be sailing and enjoying it. The current egotistical trend of "the bigger the better" is leading many people astray.
@@sauter1he wasn’t solo sailing, there was a crew of 4 with huge experience between them. But I do take your point about the ego involved in huge boats. If you and your wife want to go cruising extensively, a 12-14 metre boat is really all you need and can manage safely. If you want a 20 metre boat, you’re going to need crew all the time. And lots of them.
This reminds me of the accident on the CNB 66 Escape a few yeas ago. Large boom swinging. I never use a preventer, I have yet to see one not fail and cause problems. In large swell / strong winds from behind I hand steer if I have the main up, or if it is so strong that I don't trust not to do an accidental gybe (Or I'm just cruising) I'll sail with just the furling headsail / genoa / jib. Keeps the boat tracking better anyway and is plenty of sail area.
These large furning booms are lethal when swinging and the fact that areas where they can hit you are not marked with large yellow do not step signs is a dangerous omission for aesthetics.
Boom brake + preventer is the only way to be able to sail downwind with absolutely no worries nada 🙀 so sad to hear this tale of what could have been "prevented"
Canvis over head is something I do know about. But not on a boat, cutting away and redeploying is a second chance to get where you are going in the condition you expected. Why then on the largeest boats and in the worst wind the users can not in a single stroke cut away the canvis? Or even eject the whole rig? Is it a issue of cost. Things can be replaced if still alive. Great Video.
It’s easy. It’s the preventer. The most important running line on the boat.
I have a question. The crew must have been looking at weather forecasts. They must have seen a possible increase in wind speeds. Why didn't they put in a reef? Also, after the preventor failed and discovering that the steering had locked up, I guess my first thought would be to dowse the main. They must have had the halyard accessible in the cockpit. Is there some reason I'm not thinking of for not doing that?
In my 75 years of offshore sailing I have found mid boom preventers on a 40+Ft vessel are a recipe for a broken boom in heavy air. The forward preventer is ideal, provided it is a continuous line not in parts. If these guys had done a preventer drill before leaving the dock, this might have been preventable(pun intended).
Big boom big problem,Extraordinary force is formed.It is good two mast .They desing the big sailboats with small sailboat mentality.
Murphy's Law, applied. What a story. RIP to those who didn't make it.
All of the problems were compounded by the fact no safety protocols were established at the beginning of the Voyage meaning it took far too long to record the position of the man overboard and despite the plane being in position 20 minutes after the eventual transmission of man overboard they were now too far away to find or recover the person last seen waving to the boat
That boatyard fire pictured in the video was in Mattapoisett, MA. Has nothing to do with this yacht. I know because my 40' sloop was on the hard right in front of the burning build on the right a week before the fire! Boat is fine. My car? Not so much.
Wow sorry to hear about the car! Glad the boat is okay. It's hard to find pictures so I've noticed most people use this particular picture when explaining a boat yard fire.
Physics sadly won again. RIP, but that huge boom going out of control is terrifying.. Btw, thanks for making people aware of Australian \NZ's remote conditions. Crossing the Tasman Sea is serious business, up north of NZ is empty as for a while too.
_As I'm sure you know, CL, who thinks $750k - $1m is a "typical price," had another direct go at you. The criticism missed the whole point imo. Cheers Tim._ 🇦🇺 ⚓
Being clonked on the head by an out of control boom is very much the same experience, whether it has a furling system in it or not.
As described here, the issue appears to be that the system they had for controlling the boom was simply inadequate.
For me, the mere fact that the line they hoped to use as a preventer not being long enough indicates that they failed to prepare adequately to go to sea.
With an adequate line and system, the additional weight of a furler should easily be accounted for. To the point of irrelevance.
It wasn't the booms fault or even the autopilot. As with Escape (which several others have mentioned in the comments) the operation of the vessel and preparation for the voyage are what appear to be the most significant factors into why trouble, became disaster. Not a particular piece of kit, configuration of equipment or design of the vessel.
If the boom had a furler why not reduce sail area to limit forces (is the mainstay mostly for 'reaching' into the wind direction or for maximum down wind propulsion) ?
Isn't that a basic maneuver when sailing (maybe the furler would have required controlled manual handling, wonder if the mainstay could have been pulled down in a conventional set up) ?
There wasn’t all that much wind at the time of the accident. It built up later
Not a fan of in boom furling for that reason, too much potential energy. Also, when rigging a preventer, I route the line through mid cleats, and bring the line back to the cockpit, securing it at smaller aft winch.
Frog in boiling water scenario. As far as the preventer goes, there's nothing conclusive in this video about how it was rigged on Platino. For all we can tell, it was properly rigged to the bow and back to the cockpit with sufficient line. That said, some riggers do recommend a weak link in the preventer to let go in case the boat gets pinned on an opposite tack. I am not of that school.
RIP sailors
I've never used a preventer but that might just be because of the type of boats I have always sailed on. Of course I don't want the boom suddenly swinging the cross taking people by surprise but I also don't want to have it stuck in a terrible position.
Wouldn't a boom brake have been a much better solution? If the main had been allowed to come across slowly, the boat may have ended up in a Hove to position.
Seems to me there may be more to the story. Okay the autopilot breaks and the boat goes into an uncontrolled gybe, but what then? They could not get hands on the wheel?
Also, why are there no Jack lines rigged? Those should be visible in those photos.
So sad for the loss of life.
Crew often get annoyed by my constant verbal outbursts when sailing downwind. If anyone goes forward, I announce the old Rick Derringer song from the ‘80’s- “Boom, Boom, out go the lights”. Just as a verbal reminder of what can happen due to a lack of awareness.⛵️
I understand why boom-furling is better for sail shape, but this "huge boom let loose" is also what happened to S/V Escape (google "anatomy of a tragedy at sea"). To me it seems that in mast furling is better. We all worry about the risk of jamming and not being able to lower the sail, but the massive booms of in-boom furlers seems to be what is killing people and sinking ships.
My opinion is Escape failed because no traveler. The preventer was even more handicapped.
@@artsmith103 I'm not sure I follow you. Just like Platino the huge boom jibed and killed someone. How would a traveler have changed things, it was the mainsheet that killed the man on SV Escape.
But, details aside, I haven't read any stories about people dying because their sail got stuck in the mast, but there are now two about very well built boats with in-boom furling where the boom got loose and killed people.
Without the in-boom furling, the preventer line and hardware need not be as strong. I'm not an engineer, but I tend to think having all that weight moving around is just a bad idea.
@ovidiusnaso602 I sailed 2 trailer sailers that started without travelers. I made something of a bridle for the first one and installed a proper traveler on the 2nd. Going downwind without a traveler just adds problems.
Why not sail downwind on foresails only, going goose winged?
Why are all these boats sloop rigged instead of ketch rigged?
Great video. Excellent comments. Please fix your audio.
No mention of reefing?
perhaps a lever or pull-pin that disengages clew/foot halyard brake when boom extends past its short leash in wrong direction. Rapid de-powering is only solution to crash gybe forces [that must be stopped quickly b4 spreaders]
Good video thanks
Sailing “jib only” just seems so much safer.
But then the rudder is unbalanced.
The condition seems to rough for the discipline of the skipper, that’s the time at least the Main comes down. Just not acceptable to join lines on a critical item like a preventer. Had the skilled helmsmen been at the wheel, my orders in these condition, that autopilot is being disengaged and I’d be calling for help, steering vessel around until up wind so that the main can drop, dumping genoa sheet, engine starting to gain control, that instantaneous, just had a serious event. SCREAMING, stay low out of possible swinging boom.
But lets get to basic, if this was at night, there is no chance I’ll ever have full main up at night, 35kt winds and I’d never sail down wind with main up, 35kt winds down wind, and I’ll maybe be on 3rd reef or smaller with engine running to ensure I don’t have any wash over the transom.
But now its happened….you as skipper take the helm, Commission technical skills to check on auto pilot. And if it serviceable, I will only sail with auto pilot in the dark..does not mean I’m not observant, such high winds, following seas, and just experienced a serious heart pumping event. Assign inspection duties to ensure vessel is safe and yes, you are all on harness clipped in. Quick crew count. Nobody is going foreword without serious light on deck and most experienced person that I know will not make a mistake or it can wait and by now, I’m heading downwind with engine running 2200rpm and I’ll need a response from my navigator, scan forward, is the AIS and Radar showing safe passage, are we in deep water, and what’s the prediction for weather, waves…….please notify vessels in the area of our situation and possible emergency. By now we should be in control and I’d look to hand the helm to my second and commence my safety checks, start by ensuring all the crew are calm and understand to be on alert. Scan question our emergency procedures, once I’m sure all the risks have been addressed, double up on the watch and I will stay up until daylight and conditions have subsided.
How does the crew on such an expensive vessel not know to expect nasty conditions, its common to have Starlink onboard now and see weather other than the odd squall that the radar can detect and worsen condition alert you too.
No boom should weigh 1500 lbs. That is absurd.
Why couldn’t someone take the helm and point the boat upwind? Sounds like Hal took over the ship.
jesus why leave the autopilot on?
A boom brake will slow the boom swinging across.
Though the report on SV Platinos at page 53 under subsection Command and Control the damning conclusion comes to light despite this somewhat insincere tech heavy video.
Quote: 'No emergency drills, or any other safety training specific to the yacht and its equipment was
carried out with the crew at any time.
- No emergency procedures were developed and documented.
- No specific safety briefing was given.
- No standing orders were issued and no requirements were stated for safe practices on the
yacht (--report develop the failures in detail, my comment--)
- No log book was kept.
- No written watch roster was provided.
The owners relied on the knowledge and experience of each individual crewmember. It was assumed
that they all possessed the required expertise to effectively use the equipment onboard and respond
to an emergency.' End Quote.
That last part is the closest the report get to issue manslaughter by criminal negligence.
I don’t think you need to be quite so harsh mate. With the exception of the log book issue, you are judging yesterday’s events by today’s standards. It is largely because of the Platino incident back in 2016, that sailors now routinely have written procedures etc.
I sailed for probably 25 years before I ever received or participated in a safety briefing or even a man overboard drill. And that came after another terrible disaster, the 1998 Sydney to Hobart Race.
In fact NZ instituted its very strong laws about vessel safety as a consequence of the Platino incident. Initially, they almost bankrupted their marine industry because foreign yacht stopped coming to NZ.
In Australia we were the great beneficiary of the NZ changes until they wound the rules back a bit and foreign yacht went back to NZ, but in the meantime many of their marine workers came to Australia. And many have stayed!
That is a great point there. I looked it up and there seems even to be a biased wording by the investigators. You rarely find such diverted wording in reports done by ordinary prosecuting criminal investigators.
No boom brake?
This is just poor seamanship. Never use an autopilot during a storm.
💯
A preventer is one of the most important safety lines on a boat, and should be the same spec as the main sheet. If it's not long enough, get a longer one! I've had two accidental gybes in light airs, no more! Oh, and my instructor was at the helm a few years ago and intentionally gybed with the main sheet too slack and nearly took the coach roof out - quality.
I guess preventers and autopilots are the things people turn to in conditions like this. But is that really appropriate?
That's a truly awful tale. Maybe I'll use a thicker rope as a preventer in future...
I’m not a sailor. Can someone explain to me how a crew can be hit by the boom: in my mind, it is about 10 feet above the cockpit on a 60 foot… isn’t it? Thanks.
One possible scenario: Even with a furler (especially in boom) it is wise/standard to get crew up at the mast to have eyes on, that the sail is furling correctly. If it isn't, it could cause a jam and make it impossible to reef the sail. The crew can indicate an issue, stop the process, adjust/guide the sail back to the correct position and then furling can continue. Whilst up by the boom, you are obviously susceptible to getting clobbered if it swings violently.
Preventers should be run to the bow.
So sad the loss of life in this incident. I wonder why when their steering failed they didn't disconnect the hydraulic rams from the rudder quadrant to regain control of the boat. Controlling the boom would of course been the most urgent action, but obviously if they could have steered to a beam reach the jibing would have ceased. My Morgan 44 has a pair of stout rams, but they are easy to disconnect (of course I've never had to disconnect them in a heavy sea!) Failing that, they could have cut the hydraulic hoses thereby draining the fluid and regaining helm control.
Furling boom wieghs a lot !
Use an autopilot sparingly
Not the worst way for a man to go, but still, perfectly avoidable. Don't be stupid, people.
My preventer goes from the boom end to the bow cleat.
Carnivore menu Baby!
Inspect all you want. The problem was money. People get high on it and they get high fallutin and insulated. Some people don't like furling sails. I don't. Now put the furled sail and hardware on a boom and control it flimsy, and automate a gigantic boat with a kooky autopilot and you have a mess. Add a bunch of Sohos, who don't have the common sense to disconnect the swaying boom at the mast, and drop it on the deck. You don't stand in the way of a train. You don't stand in the way of a boom, especially a freaky design that weighs double. I wonder how many goofy boats the designer has built and if he stopped.
Sounds like root cause was carrying too much sail in deteriorating conditions.
😢
I purchased a boom brake but have not fitted it as it requires some additional blocks to be fitted to the boat. It might be time to do something about it.
However I have a 55 foot boat with in-mast sails and when going off shore (Crossing Biscay for example) I avoid sailing down wind with the main above a F4. If there is more than a F4 the Genoa is big enough to drive the boat and I can always let it go. The advantage of my boat is that the boom is above head height to the crew are safe in the event of a gybe but, better to avoid that in the first place.
Lastly with a 66 foot boat I don't know why they didn't fit a Lewmar Mamba autopilot. They are built like tanks and I have never heard of one failing.
Sorry, how many times jibed the boat acccidential? One time can happen, ok if the autopilot did by fault two times. But where was the Skipper to take manually control on a safe course? Oh Man this should not happen. Think about the lost member 😢
Everyone is discussing how to best rig preventers, the merits of in boom furling or not, etc. Perfectly legitimate, of course.
But here's a different take: how about not being a megalomaniac and not going for a massive boat with a massive rig that requires power assisted everything, and instead choose a more modestly sized boat wih much simpler and lighter gear, that you actually have a hope of controlling should the excrement hit the cooling device? Just my 2 cents. :)
there is no way the boom weighs 1500 pounds. The sail likely weighs 150-200 pounds and the boom 300-400 maximum. You are saying it weighs 3/4 of a ton, that just can not be right. Where did you get this number? They entire rig does not weigh 1500 pounds.
Hmmmm...I am not sure that his 1500 pounds is 100% correct. BUT it was 26' long with what would probably be an enormous cross section, add in the very large furling hardware, fasteners, large blocks, line, it would not surprise me much if that number was correct. We are dealing with a very large vessel with corresponding loads to be dealt with.
Cheers
Mike 🇨🇦
@ it seems way too high. The sail weighs about 150-200 so I can’t imagine the rest of the boom weighing close to 1300lbs
@greenfeilds...1 yeah I know it seems pretty high but the thickness of that boom section is likely 3/8" or even more due to the stresses it is handling. I suspect a 26' boom of those dimensions (maybe 16" × 16" - it is a main furler) likely weighs 500 - 600lbs bare. So yes the 1500 pound guess might be high but likely not by much.
Cheers
Mike
"The boom was 8.6 metres long and weighed 678kg with the mainsail furled inside." Final Accident Report, page 10. Do the math.
@@randyadams958 a 24ft long 1 inch thick 24 inch wide sheet of aluminum weighs a bit less than 700 pounds. I’m being generous as to the amount of material. Their number is just not correct. Mistakes are made it happens. It’s just wrong