I've seen thousands of films and thousands of actors, but Peter Lorre has the most distinctive and charming mask, his voice and acting skills are truly unique.
A friend of mine upon the birth of her son declared that he looked just like Peter Lorre! Poor boy on two counts! On account of his looks and on account of his brainless mum!!!
When Peter Lorre made this film he didn't speak English. He learned his lines phonetically. Such a brilliant actor. If you ever get the chance, watch his movie M, maybe his best performance.
I didn't meet Alfred Hitchcock, but I did see him, at a distance, at the Union Plaza casino in Las Vegas. He was standing at a roulette wheel, writing down notes. I did not approach him, but will never forget seeing him. What a legend.
HI A., THAT'S TRUE. I NEVER TĤOUGHT OF IT BUT TRULY HE HE DID LEND A CURIOSITY TO THE ATMOSPHERE. I WAS SOMEHOW UPLIFTED WHEN HE CAME ON SCENE😮 HE SEEMED NEÌTHER GOOD NOR BAD BUT MENACING AT ALL TIMES SOMEHOW.😉 keep viewing!!
I find this version so much more entertaining than the Hollywood version 20 years later. The wonderful chemistry and humor between Leslie Banks and Edna Best is right up there with William Powell and Myrna Loy but more subtle. The humor in scenes like the dentist's and the church are priceless!
That trademark humour of Hitchcock, and British films in general, is the only good thing about it. Edna Best's acting is especially bad, but that might be partly the directors fault.
A very sophisticated film. The antagonists all meet in the first five minutes. The shooting prowess is established. Yet the audience will be in the dark till the last part. So smart Hitch.
I don't think enough has been said about the wonderful relationship of Bob and Jill Lawrence. Rarely has a couple showed such affection, trust, humor and instant understanding of swift repartee. The Bob and Clive partnership is like that of Charters and Caldicott, and their communication during the hymn singing is priceless.
Hitchcock thought that this film feels like the job of an amateur, but it has one thing the other version of The Man Who Knew Too Much will never have: Peter Lorre.
This version is boring and amateurish, but the other one has Doris Day, who I heartily dislike for her exaggerated goody-goodiness. It is far less boring though, if only because it's in color. There is nothing good about this version at all.
Another outstanding Englishman and contributor to the world thank god for the English they have given so much in music , history , films and science what a nation.
Peter Lorre un actor de los grandes ,es un placer verlo en este video ,y también al gran maestro del suspenso ,gracias por compartir tan buen cine 👏👏👏👏👍😍🥰
Lorre only spoke broken English at this point in his career. He reportedly learned some lines in this movie using phonetics, but not really knowing what every word he said meant. I watched this movie listening for Lorre lines that sounded strange, but didn't notice any.
That’s common among actors with international appeal,I remember seeing Dustin Hoffman,Paul Newman and others speaking in various languages that they were unfamiliar with and by using a coach or brilliant director came across as incredibly fluent.
Hi 😅😅 this is one of my favorite 😮😮 🎬 movie Alfred Hitchcock is a genial director there's something mysterious in all his movies that make me shiver on my seat more please thanks 🎉🎉🎉 black and white is awesome 😮😮😮
Even the opening music is amazing. First some joyous holiday music as the tourism folders are displayed…and then the sudden slide into the almost sinister main theme, alerting you that this is going to be a Hitchcock film after all.
Thanks for this! I’ve only seen the remake with Doris Day. For sure this is Hitchcock. So suspenseful! It’s not a given that everything will be perfect in the end. And that futuristic blond streak in Peter Lorre’s hair…what a maniacal twist!
I just watched The 39 Steps, and this is another fine spy story pre-WWI. Imagination here, most WWII films lacked- they had the real stories and spies telling them. Hitchcock is still in a class of his own. Compared to the remake, I like this one a lot more, especially the acting by both parents and Betty. The final scene was realistic- 2 frantic parents staying calm to help their terrified child. They are more genuine, where Doris Day was just sappy (sorry if you're her fan- I grew up avoiding her movies). I guess some of us older people simply prefer the old to the new. TY- great film &HD!
_Aww, my dearest Helen! Be aware, Peter Lorre is watching us...I must confess that I'm not "The Man who knew So much"! Even so, it's better to take care, because the danger is waiting for us in the corner of the street! But don't be afraid, because suddenly Alfred Hitchcock says "Cut! Scene perfect!"...And we realize that is only an old Suspense movie from 89 years ago...One of the Best in action & mistery! I hope you enjoy it with us here on CCC movie chat at live! God bless you always, my Sweet Helen!_ 🤩🤩🤗🤗❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I'd give this version the edge over Hitch's 1956 remake, simply because it has Peter Lorre! Similarly, I prefer the 1937 version of KING SOLOMON'S MINES to the 1950 version because it has Paul Robeson...
@@annchurchill2638 That's right it was his film debut & it made him world famous as the child murderer. He filmed in Germany where he made his first films til 1933 Hitchcock saw Peter Lorre in "M".
Bernard Herrman wrote the score for the remake, but thought he could do most justice in re-using Arthur Benjamin's choral work in the same denoument at the Royal Albert Hall
This one is often called Hitchcock's worst film... Although his very first films are also pretty poor... The problem with this film is Hitchcock did not control the film editing... He remade the film in 1956... the film with James Stewart and Doris Day in 1956 because he was displeased with the film... This film (1934) might also be called the beginning of Hitchcock masterpieces because everything pretty much was after this film...
The 1956 film is considered to be a remake despite "featuring a significantly different plot and script," that from Wikipedia. That article also includes this snippet: "In the book-length interview Hitchcock/Truffaut (1967), in response to fellow filmmaker François Truffaut's assertion that aspects of the remake were by far superior, Hitchcock replied, 'Let's say the first version is the work of a talented amateur and the second was made by a professional.'" I myself have no comparison to contribute at this point as it's been decades since I've seen the 1956 film, and I watched this one for the first time tonight. I thought it was great, especially the fact that the ever creepy Peter Lorre plays a major role.
@@josephjohnson9805 This was actually regarded as one of his best British films. It's Peter Lorre's first english speaking role after he fled Nazi Germany. The 1956 remake is ok but James Stewart is not Peter Lorre.
Louis (about 2:20) seems to be Pierre Fresnay (Marius in Marcel Pagnol's trilogy) ! Quelle bonne surprise ! Merci pour tous ces excellents films sous-titrés
I always liked the idea that Hitchcock remade his own movie. I’m partial to the Jimmy Stewart, Doris Day version. I’m sure it only because it’s the movie I was first familiar wish.
Yes. Though I myself never like going to see my dentist. He's always looking "down in the mouth". And he has the peculiar habit of whistling "The Yanks are Coming" before he does an extraction !
Thank you for the video it was very suspenseful and good good acting for that year in the 30s made around the time I was born I was born in 1934 what year was this was it 35 I can't see up above no it's 1934 I can see that wow so that's what was going on when I was born not bad for that year I'm 89 now89 years ago they did okay
Hitchcock 'remade' this film, with many changes in plot, in 1956 starring Jimmy Stewart & Doris Day. The assassination attempt in the Albert Hall is reminiscent of a scene in his, The 39 Steps
Thanks for the upload, but please, for all that is holy, can we keep logos and "up next" bs off the last ten seconds of a suspense film? If YT cannot be constrained, give us ten seconds of dead air, rather than blocking the reunion of the family.
Peter Lorre with his little musical watch. Note how much use Hitchcock makes out of the watch as it throws off the mother's timing at the match and the daughter scowls at him "I'm NOT a little girl." The Hitchcock creed is if you put a musical watch or a little enamel pin in the movie you make it come alive within the story.
Lorres best rolls were with Greenstreet and Bogart. At least a dozen films between them. Of course Casa Blanca and The Maltese Falcon legandary films made them movie legends.
Although not as evident in this film, Peter acted with his entire body. Watch his English films, and watch his hands! They are never at rest. Lighting his cigarette; popping a piece of popcorn; repositioning a glove. Peter was the most camera aware actor ever. If someone stole a scene, they had to steal it from him. It was always his scene. Only his best friend Humphrey stood a chance. But I figure Peter decided when.
Lorre, a social democrat and close friend of Brecht, a marvellous Weimar actor who could not translate across to Hollywood. He was sentenced to be type cast as a European of criminal persuasions, at once comical and menacing. Hitchcock plumbs some of Lorres depths. Many thanks for a gem of a flic!
@@freddiemiranda5366 !!U are also my friend Freddie Miranda! I am a lazy girl and so I am cutting the classes !sorry for this ! I like u Freddie ! Thanks a lot 👸❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤💃
Loved when he was being hypnotised. Couldn’t stop laughing and it was beautifully filmed . Amazing again Hitchcock .film clip I’ll never forget . Thank you 🙏 again CCC ❤ 1st Class
@@comicsfix8460 @ 33 mins approx as a bus goes by with Isle Of Man ad on its side. Literally, blink and you'll miss it! He's only onscreen for a second or two.
Just here for Peter Lorre's brilliant acting. Always such a thrill to watch him onscreen. One of my all time favorite actor.
He was a Jewish refugee from Nazi Germany. One of the few to get out.
I've seen thousands of films and thousands of actors, but Peter Lorre has the most distinctive and charming mask, his voice and acting skills are truly unique.
@mikeymoo1291 you made oi larf.
@mikeymoo1291 It's not that exaggerated, a single film has usually many actors and some people have watched a few thousand films.
A friend of mine upon the birth of her son declared that he looked just like Peter Lorre! Poor boy on two counts! On account of his looks and on account of his brainless mum!!!
Absolutely correct
Have you seen M?
The first 10 minutes is the most exquisite beginning to any movie. The rest is just the solution. Thanks Hitch.
When Peter Lorre made this film he didn't speak English. He learned his lines phonetically. Such a brilliant actor. If you ever get the chance, watch his movie M, maybe his best performance.
I could not agree more. "M" (a German film from 1931 & directed by Fritz Lang) is one of the true cinema classics. Superb in every dept !
Yes, M is a remarkable Weimar era film.
M is a masterpiece!
I heard the same thing that the OP said here about Lorre and this film.
Yes. Back in the day when ppl felt sorry for the pedophiles and blamed the kids for being the rotten ones who turned them in. 🤬
I didn't meet Alfred Hitchcock, but I did see him, at a distance, at the Union Plaza casino in Las Vegas. He was standing at a roulette wheel, writing down notes. I did not approach him, but will never forget seeing him. What a legend.
It was his cameo moment in your life movie :P
I was there too, noticed me chatting up with him?
@@htcm038 what are you in middle school?
I made out with Hitchcock in a public restroom near San Francisco. He told me he would write a movie about me.
A few days later, Psycho came out.
Wow, what a special memory, thank you for sharing!!!🙏👌📽️👻❣️
Always enjoyed viewing Peter Lorre. A master of many different acting 🎭 art forms!!! His presence always enhances the other actor’s parts.
HI A., THAT'S TRUE. I NEVER TĤOUGHT OF IT BUT TRULY HE HE DID LEND A CURIOSITY TO THE ATMOSPHERE. I WAS SOMEHOW UPLIFTED WHEN HE CAME ON SCENE😮 HE SEEMED NEÌTHER GOOD NOR BAD BUT MENACING AT ALL TIMES SOMEHOW.😉 keep viewing!!
I heartily concur !!
Peter Lorre is ABSOLUTELY wonderful...flawless
I certainly have a notion to second THAT emotion !!
I find this version so much more entertaining than the Hollywood version 20 years later. The wonderful chemistry and humor between Leslie Banks and Edna Best is right up there with William Powell and Myrna Loy but more subtle. The humor in scenes like the dentist's and the church are priceless!
and poor old Clive.
That trademark humour of Hitchcock, and British films in general, is the only good thing about it. Edna Best's acting is especially bad, but that might be partly the directors fault.
As always, thank you for posting these great classics!
My sentiments exactly ! So wonderful to come here to TH-cam & see so many great classic of yesteryear uploaded !
A very sophisticated film. The antagonists all meet in the first five minutes. The shooting prowess is established. Yet the audience will be in the dark till the last part. So smart Hitch.
Pre-war movies are so interesting historically. And any Hitchcock film is worth watching, absolutely!
I don't think enough has been said about the wonderful relationship of Bob and Jill Lawrence. Rarely has a couple showed such affection, trust, humor and instant understanding of swift repartee. The Bob and Clive partnership is like that of Charters and Caldicott, and their communication during the hymn singing is priceless.
It’s like William Powell and Myrna Loy in the Thin Man films…without the alcohol.
The scenes of the family, especially Betty at the end, are so touching.
I had forgotten about the wife's special skill until the end
You speak the truth, Kemo Sabe !!
The quality of film is incredible
The sound is excellent
Hats off to the preservation team
Hitchcock thought that this film feels like the job of an amateur, but it has one thing the other version of The Man Who Knew Too Much will never have: Peter Lorre.
And the newer version had something this version never had - that insufferable song "Que Sera Sera". The story really doesn't need it !
As I do when I take off my hat, you make a good point ! I prefer this original over the 50s remake.
This version is boring and amateurish, but the other one has Doris Day, who I heartily dislike for her exaggerated goody-goodiness. It is far less boring though, if only because it's in color. There is nothing good about this version at all.
I've never seen this movie before; thank you for the upload. It's great. Love the oldies.
Another outstanding Englishman and contributor to the world thank god for the English they have given so much in music , history , films and science what a nation.
41:51: Right in the middle of a very tense scene, Hitchcock grants us a little humor with this ridiculous chair-throwing fight. Total mastery!
I never knew that Hitchcock made a remake of his own old film. That's amazing!
I’m so glad you wrote that. I thought I was going nuts!
@@clareshaughnessy2745same here. I knew that I had seen a movie with the same title. But this wasn't it!!!!
Cecil B. de Mille made the Ten Commandments 3 times.
@@ERH1453really??
@@VincentConti-m5jI believe it starred Doris Day and ? Que Surahh Surahh🎵🎶 what ever will be will be🎶🎶🎶🎶.
Peter Lorre un actor de los grandes ,es un placer verlo en este video ,y también al gran maestro del suspenso ,gracias por compartir tan buen cine 👏👏👏👏👍😍🥰
Have you seen the Maltese Falcon?Peter Lorre is also in Casablanca.
Both great movies.
Lorre only spoke broken English at this point in his career. He reportedly learned some lines in this movie using phonetics, but not really knowing what every word he said meant. I watched this movie listening for Lorre lines that sounded strange, but didn't notice any.
Same here. He did very well, considerring.
That’s common among actors with international appeal,I remember seeing Dustin Hoffman,Paul Newman and others speaking in various languages that they were unfamiliar with and by using a coach or brilliant director came across as incredibly fluent.
Great movie! An admirer of Mr.Lore and his dark roles. Thanks for the treat!
These British films made it possible for Hitchcock to go to Hollywood and make film magic and Hitchcock famous.
Hitchcock gave us such intricate movies with the best actors. Peter Lorre is the treasure here😊❤👍🔥
Hi 😅😅 this is one of my favorite 😮😮 🎬 movie Alfred Hitchcock is a genial director there's something mysterious in all his movies that make me shiver on my seat more please thanks 🎉🎉🎉 black and white is awesome 😮😮😮
Thanks so much for posting
I do love movies with Peter Lorre
I know the feeling !!
Thanks for this one! Thanks for all the movies.
Thanks to you too for your cult membership & support… enjoy the movies… the best is yet to come so stay tuned 📺👃📺
Specially Hitchcock's.
I agree 100 per cent !!
Great film. Never seen this before. Hitchcock was a master. Thanks for uploading
Says who ?
@@mjrotondi5086 says I
Lorre was the perfect mix of creepy and handsome
Excellent. Haven't seen this in years. What a treat, thank you CCC.😘
I like it a LOT better than the Doris Day vehicle.
Peter Lorre stole this, what a genius!
Peter lorre steals everything he's in.
That's for sure !!
-- Black and white films are the best. 😊❤️⚪️⚫️
Yes they truly are!
Exactly black and white people are the best😌❤️
I thoroughly disagree. B+W films are completely lacking in depth, detail, and character. It makes them much harder to watch.
Peter Lorre ❤
Even the opening music is amazing. First some joyous holiday music as the tourism folders are displayed…and then the sudden slide into the almost sinister main theme, alerting you that this is going to be a Hitchcock film after all.
If you love Hitchcock, you will love this one
I love this version thank you very much
Thanks for this! I’ve only seen the remake with Doris Day. For sure this is Hitchcock. So suspenseful! It’s not a given that everything will be perfect in the end. And that futuristic blond streak in Peter Lorre’s hair…what a maniacal twist!
I much prefer this version to Hitchcock's own remake, probably because of Peter Lorre.
Unfortunately i didn't see yesterday watching this GREAT film by THE BEST director in history today
Tnks CCC 👊🔥🏆
I love the old char-woman handling the pistol.
Thank you!
Thanks for posting 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👌
Nice Way to end the beautiful weekend
I just watched The 39 Steps, and this is another fine spy story pre-WWI. Imagination here, most WWII films lacked- they had the real stories and spies telling them. Hitchcock is still in a class of his own. Compared to the remake, I like this one a lot more, especially the acting by both parents and Betty. The final scene was realistic- 2 frantic parents staying calm to help their terrified child. They are more genuine, where Doris Day was just sappy (sorry if you're her fan- I grew up avoiding her movies). I guess some of us older people simply prefer the old to the new. TY- great film &HD!
Well said and well put !!
_Aww, my dearest Helen! Be aware, Peter Lorre is watching us...I must confess that I'm not "The Man who knew So much"! Even so, it's better to take care, because the danger is waiting for us in the corner of the street! But don't be afraid, because suddenly Alfred Hitchcock says "Cut! Scene perfect!"...And we realize that is only an old Suspense movie from 89 years ago...One of the Best in action & mistery! I hope you enjoy it with us here on CCC movie chat at live! God bless you always, my Sweet Helen!_ 🤩🤩🤗🤗❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Thanks Paulo 👸❤❤❤
Thank for Alfredo Hitchcock did contributed to remake movies industry which hilarious on crime, mystery, thrill
Priceless shots of pre-war London. Those two bullet holes in the open door gave the villain's final hiding place away, in the closing minutes.
Isn't it rather the chimes of his watch? (very attenuated in the part of the movie)
I'd give this version the edge over Hitch's 1956 remake, simply because it has Peter Lorre!
Similarly, I prefer the 1937 version of KING SOLOMON'S MINES to the 1950 version because it has Paul Robeson...
I agree I like this version better simply because Peter Lorre is in it . He has a good role in this.
I think Peter Lorre's first movie (Black and white) is called "M".(It means murderer)
@@annchurchill2638 That's right it was his film debut & it made him world famous as the child murderer. He filmed in Germany where he made his first films til 1933 Hitchcock saw Peter Lorre in "M".
@@winggullseagull1230 I like the moment in M when he's talking to a kid, takes out a knife and uses it to peel an orange!
Mil gracias!!!
Refreshing film, thank you!
Thanks, never seen the original, only the remake with Jimmy Stewart and Doris Day!
Peter Lorre is fabulous in this movie
So true !
Thanks for posting this movie haven’t seen this one great one
Só o nome de Hitchcock já me chama pra ver o filme!
Great movie. Thanks.
Bernard Herrman wrote the score for the remake, but thought he could do most justice in re-using Arthur Benjamin's choral work in the same denoument at the Royal Albert Hall
Interesting how Hitchcock used the same title for his 1956 film with James Stewart and Doris Day
This one is often called Hitchcock's worst film... Although his very first films are also pretty poor... The problem with this film is Hitchcock did not control the film editing... He remade the film in 1956... the film with James Stewart and Doris Day in 1956 because he was displeased with the film... This film (1934) might also be called the beginning of Hitchcock masterpieces because everything pretty much was after this film...
The 1956 one is a lot better imo this one is just meh
@@annalarose5392 I totally disagree - this one is considered by most film critics to be the superior one.
The 1956 film is considered to be a remake despite "featuring a significantly different plot and script," that from Wikipedia. That article also includes this snippet:
"In the book-length interview Hitchcock/Truffaut (1967), in response to fellow filmmaker François Truffaut's assertion that aspects of the remake were by far superior, Hitchcock replied, 'Let's say the first version is the work of a talented amateur and the second was made by a professional.'"
I myself have no comparison to contribute at this point as it's been decades since I've seen the 1956 film, and I watched this one for the first time tonight. I thought it was great, especially the fact that the ever creepy Peter Lorre plays a major role.
@@josephjohnson9805 This was actually regarded as one of his best British films. It's Peter Lorre's first english speaking role after he fled Nazi Germany.
The 1956 remake is ok but James Stewart is not Peter Lorre.
Louis (about 2:20) seems to be Pierre Fresnay (Marius in Marcel Pagnol's trilogy) ! Quelle bonne surprise ! Merci pour tous ces excellents films sous-titrés
Fresnay was used by Noel Coward as the lead in a musical comedy around this time
@@ausbrum You made me discover that it was Conversation Piece with Yvonne Printemps, many thanks :)
Da hört man noch das Österreichische leicht im Hintergrund heraus beim großartigen Peter Lorre Löwenstein László. Ruhe in Frieden ❤
Trebuie văzut. Mulțumesc!
What a classic, I remember getting freaked out watching this as a teen.
I always liked the idea that Hitchcock remade his own movie. I’m partial to the Jimmy Stewart, Doris Day version. I’m sure it only because it’s the movie I was first familiar wish.
The visit to the dentists office is classic Hitchcock.
Yes. Though I myself never like going to see my dentist. He's always looking "down in the mouth". And he has the peculiar habit of whistling "The Yanks are Coming" before he does an extraction !
Thank you for the video it was very suspenseful and good good acting for that year in the 30s made around the time I was born I was born in 1934 what year was this was it 35 I can't see up above no it's 1934 I can see that wow so that's what was going on when I was born not bad for that year I'm 89 now89 years ago they did okay
Excellent movie, thank you 👍
Hitchcock 'remade' this film, with many changes in plot, in 1956 starring Jimmy Stewart & Doris Day. The assassination attempt in the Albert Hall is reminiscent of a scene in his, The 39 Steps
I find your observations fascinating. Where might I subscribe to your newsletter?
Interesting to see how much Hitchcock improved this first attempt 22 years later.
Improved ? I dont think so. This one is the true classic.
Thanks for the upload, but please, for all that is holy, can we keep logos and "up next" bs off the last ten seconds of a suspense film? If YT cannot be constrained, give us ten seconds of dead air, rather than blocking the reunion of the family.
Thank you.
Peter Lorre with his little musical watch. Note how much use Hitchcock makes out of the watch as it throws off the mother's timing at the match and the daughter scowls at him "I'm NOT a little girl." The Hitchcock creed is if you put a musical watch or a little enamel pin in the movie you make it come alive within the story.
Hitchcock the master
Peter Lorre.. always liked him!
Peter Lorre just needs to smile to look sinister. Or something. Sad, maybe. What character.
The volume on the tv for this movie is too low and when a commercial plays it blast
Black & White Movies Are The Best ❤
Este é um filmaço; tem que ser assistído calmamente, talvez, no silêncio da madrugada.
...sim, tem filmes que tem até horário pra assistir, esse é um deles..., bom domingo...
Thank you
Hichcock , an early sample of his talent
2:20 : Lorre realizes whom he is talking to, does a surprise take and recovers immediately: now, THAT is acting!
Lorres best rolls were with Greenstreet and Bogart. At least a dozen films between them. Of course Casa Blanca and The Maltese Falcon legandary films made them movie legends.
Very good
Although not as evident in this film, Peter acted with his entire body. Watch his English films, and watch his hands! They are never at rest. Lighting his cigarette; popping a piece of popcorn; repositioning a glove. Peter was the most camera aware actor ever. If someone stole a scene, they had to steal it from him. It was always his scene. Only his best friend Humphrey stood a chance. But I figure Peter decided when.
What a magnificent movie!👍
Fascinating!
Peter stole the show,pure evil with a sense of humor.
Peter Lorre com direção de Hitchcock, vale uma conferida.
Hitchcock is master at his craft is superb narrator
Good Evening..... ! 🎩🕸️🎥🎭🎬🎻🗡️👀💤
You can really see the influence of German Expressionism in these early Hitchcock films.
Lorre, a social democrat and close friend of Brecht, a marvellous Weimar actor who could not translate across to Hollywood. He was sentenced to be type cast as a European of criminal persuasions, at once comical and menacing. Hitchcock plumbs some of Lorres depths. Many thanks for a gem of a flic!
Love the ending, at 1:04:45, where there always seems to be time for a “cuppa”-even in the midst of a gunfight. So very British.
and the young girl lived happily ever after...
with only a few problems.
😂 I’ve never seen anybody faint in slow motion before. 😊
I love this film.
The ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ have a ‘flair’ one doesn’t see with most ‘spouses.’
Me encantan estas peliculas son apasionantes
Excellent
The detective is the drummer in Young and Innocent.
They go on with the concert after the assassination attempt. LOL
I love my friends
And we love Helen! ♥
@@RealBigBadJohn Thanks Big John ! 👸❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
We adore you too Helen ❤️ and may God bless you and your love ones as only he can 🙏🌼.
@@freddiemiranda5366 !!U are also my friend Freddie Miranda! I am a lazy girl and so I am cutting the classes !sorry for this ! I like u Freddie ! Thanks a lot 👸❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤💃
Goood Eeveninng Eeveryboddy
Loved when he was being hypnotised. Couldn’t stop laughing and it was beautifully filmed . Amazing again Hitchcock .film clip I’ll never forget . Thank you 🙏 again CCC ❤ 1st Class
WOULD YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW IF ALFRED HITCHCOCK MADE A CAMEO APPEARANCE IN THIS MOVIE?
@@comicsfix8460 he usually does
@@comicsfix8460 @ 33 mins approx as a bus goes by with Isle Of Man ad on its side. Literally, blink and you'll miss it! He's only onscreen for a second or two.