Fedor and bryn was beaten by 2 recreational players known as ossi and vlad at the final four in the triton $150 k buy in even some notable names such greenwood,chidwick and Dan smit was at th FT.
Dan was never a professional anything. Just a trust fund kid, calling that guy a professional poker player is a slap in the face to the poker community lol
He was a professional at game selection. Doing so can make you a pro as you’re making more than you’re losing. So no, it’s not a slap in the face considering how shady the industry is in other areas with way worse people.
@ being profitable doesn’t necessarily make u a “pro” a pro is one who travels the circuit and plays in the biggest games against the toughest competition. A person that has a win rate at 1000NL wouldn’t be considered a pro, they would be considered a profitable reg
@@ralphkotwica6184 you can define a pro in multiple ways. Most of them are self described. Totally up to interpretation as one thing can have multiple meanings. But someone who plays poker with no other income while winning can absolutely be labeled a pro. As far as what Bilzerian is or labels as… who fkn cares.
Great vid keep it up man love the khannel
Appreciate this!
@PokerBoomYT you've Been working hard I see ya Bro 💯
Great video
Thanks so much!
Fedor and bryn was beaten by 2 recreational players known as ossi and vlad at the final four in the triton $150 k buy in even some notable names such greenwood,chidwick and Dan smit was at th FT.
Dan was never a professional anything. Just a trust fund kid, calling that guy a professional poker player is a slap in the face to the poker community lol
He always put himself in soft seats
He was a professional at game selection.
Doing so can make you a pro as you’re making more than you’re losing.
So no, it’s not a slap in the face considering how shady the industry is in other areas with way worse people.
@ being profitable doesn’t necessarily make u a “pro” a pro is one who travels the circuit and plays in the biggest games against the toughest competition. A person that has a win rate at 1000NL wouldn’t be considered a pro, they would be considered a profitable reg
@@ralphkotwica6184 you can define a pro in multiple ways. Most of them are self described. Totally up to interpretation as one thing can have multiple meanings. But someone who plays poker with no other income while winning can absolutely be labeled a pro. As far as what Bilzerian is or labels as… who fkn cares.
@ lemme guess u prolly crush 10 nl and u consider urself a world beating crusher huh 🤔
mike the mouth is a great guy. he only talks big crap for the tv.
Agree, he's the man
Technically “halfway there” would be entry #6
Good call
Poker?
Yes…
@ if you say so.
Not sure why you are talking so slowly in this video. It is so noticeable that it really distracts from enjoying the content at all.
My bad!