Actually, this goal was scored in double overtime. The "triple overtime" call was in reference to the Canucks winning their third consecutive overtime game to comeback from a 3-1 deficit to win the series.
That is something else right there. IM from the future . It is about to be game 7 against the Oilers in round 2 in the playoffs and I'm in Vancouver so.... God please Canucks win in 2 days
That's true, but without Bure's finish it's just another great pass in a great game... and not the primary assist of the single most memorable goal in Vancouver Canucks franchise history.
I think this is the best Canucks' team. However, Vancouver was fortunate that a couple of the Calgary Flames got injured in consecutive games. I think game #6 of the finals that year was the best ever Vancouver Canucks' game.😊
I think you meant triple OT? anyway, this was def a memorable moment, and a magical year for sure. I was really young then and still wasn't into hockey too much but my dad was a huge fan which ultimately made me one after that run.
You couldn't write a more perfect ending if you tried. This would already be too cliched. The most exciting player in Canucks history scoring on his most famous style, a breakaway, which is also the most exciting play in hockey. And in OT Game 7!
In hindsight, which was the bigger goal for Vancouver? Bure against Calgary or Burrows against Chicago? Personally, I'd have to lean toward Burrows. With Calgary, sure they lost their last three playoff matches against them, but those were all back in 83, 84, and 89. However, the Canucks never had Bure in the 80s, were lucky to even make the playoffs with the lineup they had then. The Flames, meanwhile, were a powerhouse. By 1994, both teams completely overhauled their rosters and were on even ground, a lot of the bitterness from previous years had waned. However, by 2009, both Vancouver and Chicago put forward the same core cast, and bad blood was brewing between the players themselves. Both teams had Stanley Cup aspirations, and were both legitimate contenders and both had high aspirations. And after two consecutive losses to Chicago, Vancouver, armed with their best lineup ever, had been forced into a do-or-die situation. Chicago had drastically outdone them in games 4, 5, and 6, and a game 7 loss would have been ultimate humiliation, would've left everyone with the lingering mood of being unable to ever beat their hated foe. Burrows ended that once and for all.
I would say it depends on your age maybe. If you were not alive for Burr's goal, Burrow's wins.. idk, it's a really tough call. I never thought anything could top Bure but that Burrows goal released so much emotion that it's hard to not pick that one. Idk man..that's tough.
@@GR-bn3xj I was too young to remember much in 1994 - never saw the previous series with the Flames. Rationally speaking, the three losses to the Flames shouldn't be much of a disappointment, since the Canucks were big underdogs. If anything, fans from those days would be craving their own big star so they can compete with the Flames and Oilers. They got him in 91, when Bure arrived, and 94 only proved their desires. But against Chicago, Vancouver had all their stars in place, with mile-high expectations, but kept losing. After two consecutive playoff losses to the same lineup, the angst naturally would be higher.
@@broadstreet21 I was around In 94 and 11 and watched both series. I was too young to remember their previous Stanley cup appearance when they lost to the Islanders. I am trying to remember which goal filled me with more joy. When you listen to the calls, Burrows goal gets the nod. Bc the Bure game was in Calgary, it's hard to compare the fans reactions. As far as my reactions, they were equally joyful but for different reasons maybe. The early to mid 90's Canucks were just not great during the regular season outside of a year here or there. They were good during the playoffs however. As you said, Calgary was a huge favorite, and going down 3-1 and winning the last 3 games in OT built up some insane emotions. That's never been done before or since. That's amazing. It was such a holy crap we really just won moment. That whole game and series was amazing. It was 100% joy and happiness. Now the Burrows goal was also an OT winner in a game 7. I don't have to go into all the emotions we all had with that and the previous two years. I didn't expect to win that series even after being up 3-0. I was hoping but Chicago just had our number. When Burrows scored, it was probably more emotional, but not 100% joy, probably 50% joy and 45 % relief and 5 % holy S**t we actually won.. expectations were so much higher then. What's true with both teams is I felt like if we won the first round, we would make the finals. I guess the Burrows goal had more emotions overall, although Bure's goal was pure ecstasy while Burrows was a flood of different emotions and was stronger. So which loss hurt more, 94 or 11? They both lost in game 7. I think the 11 team was better than Boston but just got worn down, and 94 he Canucks were not as good overall as the rangers talent wise but played with such heart. That rangers team was incredibly stacked, bc the Canucks team was loaded. I look back at who was on 94 and it's amazing what a talented group that was. Outside of those losses, the losses by the West coast express and the Big Line to Minnesota and Calgary were the hardest. Idk which one hurt more. Probably Minnesota bc we had a path to the finals wide open..Calgary hurt bc of Matt Cooke sending it into OT. I was watching and woke up the entire family when he scored that goal.and didn't care. Being a Canucks fan has given me so many memorable playoff moments. It's great we can have conversations and the answer isn't easy..
@@GR-bn3xj Good assessment. Yes, now that you brought up the finals, I do agree. In 94, Vancouver had no business coming within two goal of beating the Rangers - they were like the Blackhawks of 11, almost taking away the prize that was "rightfully New York's." But in 11, Vancouver was on the other side, the heavily favored team. Losing was a massive disappointment of the highest order, like, well New York losing in 94.
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
Thumbs up if you're here after watching THG's recreation.
I watched this one first then watched the Hockey Guys lol
Actually, this goal was scored in double overtime. The "triple overtime" call was in reference to the Canucks winning their third consecutive overtime game to comeback from a 3-1 deficit to win the series.
That is something else right there. IM from the future . It is about to be game 7 against the Oilers in round 2 in the playoffs and I'm in Vancouver so.... God please Canucks win in 2 days
Bure gets the glory but that pass from Jeff Brown was a beauty.
Beauty pass, Clutch goal!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's true, but without Bure's finish it's just another great pass in a great game... and not the primary assist of the single most memorable goal in Vancouver Canucks franchise history.
It is the 30th anniversary of this amazing run. Bure on this Canucks team would set the ice on fire.
THG fame
He CHANGED EVERYTHING when he showed up.
Looks onside when you slow it down. That pass though...wow!
THG
Canucks will never have a player like Bure.
"Brown ahead for Bure! Bure going in....HE SCORES!! Pavel Bure has won it for the Vancouver Canucks!" What a great call for a great goal!
This goal is easily better than the Burrows goal in every aspect. Young-uns who pick Burrows just don't know better.
Jim Hughson and goal horn are cherries on top of the Burrows goal cake
@@xlr0gd205 Jim Robson and sending the Flames home in their own building and ending Vernon’s career with Calgary are just as good.
@@September2004only in Calgary. He did even better in Detroit
I love the sound the puck makes when it hits Bure's stick. It's like a pistol being shot in the air to let 100m sprinters know to start running.
Who else is here from The Hockey Guy?
Yeah
Don Whitman was spectacular. Love from Buffalo.
I think this is the best Canucks' team. However, Vancouver was fortunate that a couple of the Calgary Flames got injured in consecutive games. I think game #6 of the finals that year was the best ever Vancouver Canucks' game.😊
Who else is here after listening to Gary Roberts episode on Spittin Chiclets?
I think you meant triple OT?
anyway, this was def a memorable moment, and a magical year for sure. I was really young then and still wasn't into hockey too much but my dad was a huge fan which ultimately made me one after that run.
You couldn't write a more perfect ending if you tried. This would already be too cliched.
The most exciting player in Canucks history scoring on his most famous style, a breakaway, which is also the most exciting play in hockey. And in OT Game 7!
Chiclets brought me here
Not impressed. Shannon did it way better.
0:04
In hindsight, which was the bigger goal for Vancouver? Bure against Calgary or Burrows against Chicago?
Personally, I'd have to lean toward Burrows.
With Calgary, sure they lost their last three playoff matches against them, but those were all back in 83, 84, and 89. However, the Canucks never had Bure in the 80s, were lucky to even make the playoffs with the lineup they had then. The Flames, meanwhile, were a powerhouse. By 1994, both teams completely overhauled their rosters and were on even ground, a lot of the bitterness from previous years had waned.
However, by 2009, both Vancouver and Chicago put forward the same core cast, and bad blood was brewing between the players themselves. Both teams had Stanley Cup aspirations, and were both legitimate contenders and both had high aspirations. And after two consecutive losses to Chicago, Vancouver, armed with their best lineup ever, had been forced into a do-or-die situation. Chicago had drastically outdone them in games 4, 5, and 6, and a game 7 loss would have been ultimate humiliation, would've left everyone with the lingering mood of being unable to ever beat their hated foe. Burrows ended that once and for all.
Any thoughts?
I would say it depends on your age maybe. If you were not alive for Burr's goal, Burrow's wins.. idk, it's a really tough call. I never thought anything could top Bure but that Burrows goal released so much emotion that it's hard to not pick that one. Idk man..that's tough.
@@GR-bn3xj I was too young to remember much in 1994 - never saw the previous series with the Flames. Rationally speaking, the three losses to the Flames shouldn't be much of a disappointment, since the Canucks were big underdogs.
If anything, fans from those days would be craving their own big star so they can compete with the Flames and Oilers. They got him in 91, when Bure arrived, and 94 only proved their desires.
But against Chicago, Vancouver had all their stars in place, with mile-high expectations, but kept losing. After two consecutive playoff losses to the same lineup, the angst naturally would be higher.
@@broadstreet21 I was around In 94 and 11 and watched both series. I was too young to remember their previous Stanley cup appearance when they lost to the Islanders. I am trying to remember which goal filled me with more joy. When you listen to the calls, Burrows goal gets the nod. Bc the Bure game was in Calgary, it's hard to compare the fans reactions. As far as my reactions, they were equally joyful but for different reasons maybe. The early to mid 90's Canucks were just not great during the regular season outside of a year here or there. They were good during the playoffs however. As you said, Calgary was a huge favorite, and going down 3-1 and winning the last 3 games in OT built up some insane emotions. That's never been done before or since. That's amazing. It was such a holy crap we really just won moment. That whole game and series was amazing. It was 100% joy and happiness. Now the Burrows goal was also an OT winner in a game 7. I don't have to go into all the emotions we all had with that and the previous two years. I didn't expect to win that series even after being up 3-0. I was hoping but Chicago just had our number. When Burrows scored, it was probably more emotional, but not 100% joy, probably 50% joy and 45 % relief and 5 % holy S**t we actually won.. expectations were so much higher then. What's true with both teams is I felt like if we won the first round, we would make the finals. I guess the Burrows goal had more emotions overall, although Bure's goal was pure ecstasy while Burrows was a flood of different emotions and was stronger.
So which loss hurt more, 94 or 11? They both lost in game 7. I think the 11 team was better than Boston but just got worn down, and 94 he Canucks were not as good overall as the rangers talent wise but played with such heart. That rangers team was incredibly stacked, bc the Canucks team was loaded. I look back at who was on 94 and it's amazing what a talented group that was. Outside of those losses, the losses by the West coast express and the Big Line to Minnesota and Calgary were the hardest. Idk which one hurt more. Probably Minnesota bc we had a path to the finals wide open..Calgary hurt bc of Matt Cooke sending it into OT. I was watching and woke up the entire family when he scored that goal.and didn't care. Being a Canucks fan has given me so many memorable playoff moments. It's great we can have conversations and the answer isn't easy..
@@GR-bn3xj Good assessment. Yes, now that you brought up the finals, I do agree. In 94, Vancouver had no business coming within two goal of beating the Rangers - they were like the Blackhawks of 11, almost taking away the prize that was "rightfully New York's." But in 11, Vancouver was on the other side, the heavily favored team. Losing was a massive disappointment of the highest order, like, well New York losing in 94.
Video replay says he was offside.
Not even close hahahaha