Kadee Couplings at Chadwick Model Railway | 81.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.ค. 2024
  • Kadee couplings are a breath of fresh air at Chadwick Model Railway.
    Episode Two looks at the benefits of Kadee couplings here at Chadwick Model Railway.
    Patreon Link. www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=15...
    Donation Link. paypal.me/ChadwickModelRailway
    Here's some of my gear (Affiliate Links).
    WERA Screwdriver set amzn.to/2ZX0VJu
    Magnetic Clamps amzn.to/2Nczc0y
    Makita Drill amzn.to/2ZSJaLr
    New Battery Dremel amzn.to/32CC8r4
    Sculptamold amzn.to/2Wh5RGr
    Bosch Hot Glue Gun amzn.to/2VWtK6X
    Polystyrene Cutter goo.gl/GpWgWp
    I1ata Airbrush goo.gl/P1ABXd
    Compressor amzn.to/2MKItc1
    Com Art Paints amzn.to/2KFuDKn
    Laser level amzn.to/2KRA5Y9
    Soldering Iron amzn.to/2F2EmUl
    Helping Hand amzn.to/2qOt0Oy
    Miniature Camera goo.gl/UzYWp6
    Optical Visor goo.gl/ljSzBi
    Magnifier Table Lamp goo.gl/seg8Dj
    Fire Extinguisher amzn.to/34FEBCN
    First Aid Kit amzn.to/2AhaWSk
    Video Gear
    Video Camera (4K) goo.gl/Q36cAY
    Microphone goo.gl/RqY6MR
    Old Sony Camera goo.gl/r8ao7k
  • แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต

ความคิดเห็น • 584

  • @ModelTrainOutsider
    @ModelTrainOutsider 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Maybe the best in-depth look at and explanation of KaDee couplers I have seen. They have a myriad of ultra-realistic couplings.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Anthony, I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it.

    • @rhshoe6929
      @rhshoe6929 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Charlie, I’m rebuilding my layout. I have been ordering brand new code 83 track.it doesn’t mater what fish plates I use with code 83 or code 100, does it. I bought a lot of engines and cars second hand. Because I was still working on my layout, I didn’t look at them all. I have since found out that one of my engines has the back set of wheel tide on. Do you know where I could get it fixed. In the UK or the States. Finally, I needed to know how to fix couplings but I found your video. Thanks for putting it online.
      Bob

    • @alainaarrhodge5413
      @alainaarrhodge5413 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wholeheartedly agree with this! Our HO Scale model Railway here in Beaverton, OR, USA requires it's members to use KaDee couplers on all rolling stock and locomotives. It saves so much headache if we need to do an coupler repair during a show because we all have the repair parts. I wish you would have discussed the shelf-pin couplers that KaDee produces. They're great when you have a modular layout or long strings of cars.

    • @paulredding5864
      @paulredding5864 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally agree Anthony, this is a reference video for posterity. I am just starting to understand them for my kit built wagons and need to learn which ones I need. Top job again Charlie 🤩

  • @michaelquinones-lx6ks
    @michaelquinones-lx6ks หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you very much for buying an American product, And, Greetings from the USA.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re most welcome, Michael. Regards, Charlie.

    • @michaelquinones-lx6ks
      @michaelquinones-lx6ks หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ChadwickModelRailway Thank you very much.

  • @michaelhjerpe7763
    @michaelhjerpe7763 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're the best to explain everything, thanks Charlie!

  • @meester5565
    @meester5565 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent I've saved this to watch later, I'm glad you did this as you are very easy to listen to and a good teacher.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kev, you’re too kind. I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it. Regards Charlie

  • @davidstone5317
    @davidstone5317 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Charlie, another well produced, well presented and informative video.

  • @eddiestuart3898
    @eddiestuart3898 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Charlie, I've been eyeing up Kadee for a while and you've explained more here than everything else I've found so far.... I shall now have a go. Many thanks!!

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Eddie, they are a very useful product, I like them.

  • @morrisonthemove7988
    @morrisonthemove7988 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks Charlie That has to be the most informative video of this minefield there is , gives me a bit more confidence in changing my couplings Cheers Keith

  • @pgcroc8484
    @pgcroc8484 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great stuff Charlie. Very informative. Will look into them for my layout. Congratulations on passing the 25k subscriber mark. Cheers. Pete

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Pete, you’re too kind. They do look so much better,

  • @tmcg972
    @tmcg972 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great video showing the pros and cons of these couplings. Very informative and helpful as usual, thanks a lot Charlie!

  • @james2004k
    @james2004k 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done Charlie, very informative. Been using Kadee's for many years.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks James, I can see their attractiveness and I’ll buy them in bulk too.

  • @rowanm4074
    @rowanm4074 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Top episode Charlie I been through trying to work it out years ago you video would help a lot of people out who are just starting with them top job again as always keep it up

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Rowan, i’m so pleased that you enjoyed it, regards Charlie,

  • @robingagnon9659
    @robingagnon9659 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank you Charlie for these great explanations, I never new what center set meant, now I know how to adjust the height between each cars ;) love the Union Jack pin by the way :)

  • @ElNeroDiablo
    @ElNeroDiablo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love your vids Charlie, and this is really useful info that has got me considering automatically switching all my stock and locos to Kadee when I can set up a proper little railway once again when I've got the sheltered, insulated and powered space to do so in a shed.

  • @mandbhomestead
    @mandbhomestead 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Charlie, great video on couplers. You provided a lot of info on this topic. I really learned a lot. Thanks for sharing all this info. Ken

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Ken, I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it and found it useful.

  • @kevinjones5800
    @kevinjones5800 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Charlie, this video has been a total eye opener with regards to the different types and heights etc, I’ve bought a few packs of NEM kadee’s but not fitted any yet, I’ve saved this video for future reference, keep up the good work

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Kevin, I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it and found it useful.

  • @onnomulder9775
    @onnomulder9775 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video again Charlie!!! Thanks for sharing! Cheers Onno.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Onno, I’m so pleased that you’re still with me.

  • @quentinwebb4079
    @quentinwebb4079 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Greetings from the States! Charlie your video has helped me solve my coupler height issues with my roster, thank you!

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m so pleased that you enjoyed the video Quentin and found it useful.

  • @lordcondio1036
    @lordcondio1036 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Charlie for a fantastic, clear and informative video on these couplings. I'm just starting to build up stock etc to start a layout and this has been a fantastic help. Thank you from a cold and wet Scotland

  • @rajeshpisharody8419
    @rajeshpisharody8419 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Charlie, Thank you for your videos. Your knowledge in different aspects of Model Railways is very impressive. Your ability to share that knowledge with other fellow modellers with varying levels of understanding, is even more impressive. Charlie to Model Railway is like Sir David Attenborough to animal documentaries. Brilliant.

  • @AberystwythStation
    @AberystwythStation 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful video Charlie. I think I shall look into investing in some of these for myself. You did a great job at explaining how they work. Looking forward to part 3. GWR

  • @rjwerhand6520
    @rjwerhand6520 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awaiting my first 148 packet from Kadee right now - along with a bunch of new metal wheels and washers based on your last video regarding fixing those first. Thanks for your expertise, Charlie!

  • @RobA500
    @RobA500 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nicely explained Charlie this does give some food for thought. I look forward to what you have to say in the last chapter.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Rob, I’m so pleased you found it interesting. Regards Charlie.

  • @bigfoot4148
    @bigfoot4148 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A most informative video, thank you for taking the time to explain all that you did. It has helped me in my endeavors to make more informed decision on changing out my couplers. I'm from the states and all my equipment is at least 40 years old, and all I have is hook horn couplers. At the moment I cannot justify buying a whole set of Katie couplers to replace my hook horn couplers. Price is certainly something that we've all had to deal with and when you're on a fixed budget it makes it even more imperative to way the pros and cons. Thank you again for the video, I am one that really appreciate your effort.

  • @davidirving6914
    @davidirving6914 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have persuaded me to have a go!
    Very informative and well presented, as usual

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it David. But just convert one rake at a time otherwise you could end up in a right pickle.

  • @LaytonJunction
    @LaytonJunction 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great stuff charlie very enjoyable 👍👍👍😁 do agree with you on the tension couplings cheers al 😃

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Al, I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it. Hopefully tension lock couplings will die eventually.

  • @Mookie1340
    @Mookie1340 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Charlie, for an informative video.

  • @peterdarton9603
    @peterdarton9603 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Timely video, just bought some this week to start converting my trains. Hello from down the road at Tintinhull.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so very pleased that you found it interesting Peter and as a useful time.

  • @malcanderson9579
    @malcanderson9579 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Couldn't agree more, Kadee's really are breath of fresh air and fun to fit and use.

  • @winstonbusby7583
    @winstonbusby7583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic once again . I might be sold on kadee now they have evolved well .looking forward to next one

  • @americantorino
    @americantorino 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Been using them for like 20 years between me and dad. Love them I've tried cheaper options but always come back to these in the end.

  • @davidhudson391
    @davidhudson391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My eyes have just watered at the price of the starter set Charlie!

  • @SeatedViper
    @SeatedViper 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great! Thanks for producing this. For the information of anyone worrying about old stock with "non-NEM" couplings to change, around half of my vehicles fit this description, some being around forty years old. Yes, there's some surgery involved, but it is relatively easy.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      We all love to improve our stock Peter. And good luck with yours. Regards Charlie.

  • @pauldarke8024
    @pauldarke8024 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Charlie, as always a great video.

  • @paulskehan6274
    @paulskehan6274 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi Charlie
    I started using Kadee couplings years ago. With a fair bit of stock I set up a few wagons with one Kadee only. I used them as transition wagons and converted the rest one at a time. As a teenager then funds were limited. Also the other end of the guage can be used to work out the thickness of the packing required.
    Love your videos.
    Paul from Zillmere

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Paul, I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it. Regards Charlie.

  • @mattjackson8226
    @mattjackson8226 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video as always Charlie. Really enjoyed learning more about KDs. I have a big fleet of stuff all with tension locks and have wondered about fitting some with KDs in future. Thanks

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that you found it useful Matt.

    • @davidcurtis5398
      @davidcurtis5398 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you have a large fleet, it might be less money if you buy in bulk.. I did years ago...

    • @kiwitrainguy
      @kiwitrainguy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Important note: Kadee only have bulk packs of the couplers that attach with screws i.e. they don't do bulk packs for their NEM couplers.

  • @jonharbour9166
    @jonharbour9166 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another marvellous video Charlie. You have a wonderful knack of explaining things in easy to understand terms. It's truly a gift.
    I immediately switch all my stock with NEMs to Kadees but have so far baulked at changing the non-NEM stock. You've inspired me to 'have a go' when I can next get to a shop (we're in week three of another COVID lockdown in Sydney right now). I took the opportunity to check out McKinley Railway and my head exploded at the money being spent there! It's truly epic in scope but my goodness, how much must it have all cost?!

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great comment Jon, McKinley is a beast but a fascinating one.

  • @24th1879
    @24th1879 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks Charlie, another very imformative video, yeah I'm with you in respect of kadee's much better than tention lock..

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Chris. I’m so pleased we’re on the same side.

  • @speedemon81
    @speedemon81 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    From an Australian who uses Kadees all the time, you have explained these rather well. I use the Kadee NEM socket couplers on my few European locomotives, much improving functionality.
    Also anyone with a fleet of coal wagons certainly needs a bulk pack, they do get cheaper with the larger sized packs. ;)
    And finally, if you move wagons around to a club often, springs can come out more frequently, but is a super minor issue if you pack the models well.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that you enjoyed the video mate. Even though you’re already an enthusiast of these couplings.

  • @dkaustin98
    @dkaustin98 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! When I was big into NTrak I also used Unimate couplers for long drags of coal cars. Coal cars are usually not individually switched.. So, I had a 5 car set with Unimates between the cars and Kadees on the end cars. It made it cheaper to equip 5 cars strings with couplers. In operations the theory was each 5 car string was never separated. That worked well.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sound advice thanks mate. I was aiming at triplets of wagons.

  • @jimtedesco
    @jimtedesco 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Charlie, some valuable info.

  • @2Lockey
    @2Lockey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Charlie! I’m in the process of changing all my stock to Kadee couplings, and have come across all the issues you’ve highlighted.
    I’m so frustrated with all the differentiations between the manufacturers myself, and am gradually working through them, by several different methods. Stiff upper lip and all that, I’ll get there!

  • @pathfinderrailroad5721
    @pathfinderrailroad5721 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Charlie I appreciate the info , Brian

  • @Sandlingjunction
    @Sandlingjunction 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just what I needed Charlie in-depth and useful info, as usual, cheers Paul at Sandling Junction

  • @gregoryhale2202
    @gregoryhale2202 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Charlie, When I first decided to get into model railways I went to a few of my friends who have layouts, most of whom ran Hornby locos and Hornby rolling stock. One of the first things I noticed were the ugly couplers and also the difficulty they had uncoupling one wagon from another. Then I saw a layout where all his stock had been converted to Kadee couplers, so it was a very easy decision to go down the Kadee path little by little because as you rightly pointed out it is not a cheap exercise. Luckily for me I don`t have a large layout, hence I have never had the need to run long trains, so it is not costing me an arm & a leg to convert to Kadee couplers, a decision I have not regretted. I will look forward to your next video. Cheers Greg

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Greg, yes it’s a pretty awful situation that the UK has ended up in. As expensive as these couplings are, they are the only way ahead.

  • @gregbrassington2120
    @gregbrassington2120 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great informative video Charlie .Kadee are the go!.
    Cheers Greg Brassington.

  • @jolliemark6294
    @jolliemark6294 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, you did a great job of explanation of Kadee the are the best, in the states Kadee have what is called a horn hook coupler that comes on most cars but best manufacturers have turned to their version of kadee now but we still convert over the kadee as they work the best. Now n scale is a whole different game....thanks for sharing....Jack 👍

  • @billallen7468
    @billallen7468 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the good videos. Kadee used to use a bronze spring (copper colour) in the gear box. About 10 years ago they began making the ones with the wire whisker springs but also continued making the old ones.
    You mentioned getting some #5s, they have the bronze springs. The equivalent with the whiskers is #148.

  • @kenshores9900
    @kenshores9900 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Charlie: Yet another good video. This is again applicable to other scales. I remember when Kadee’s first came on the market. While prototypical they are expensive and most modelers make economic decisions regarding where we can spend our mad money so your wife and children do not fuse to much. Most of the cars I own have rapido paddle couplers. I am converting to micro trains couplers (spin off of Kadee)(I believe that they are in the family literally. Glad you did this so that it can be referred to. (I have gotten older and my memory plays trickers on me). Keep it up the videos. Maybe the European manufactures will realize that they are shooting themselves in the foot because model railroaders are resourceful and will figure out a work around.

  • @andrewellaway9086
    @andrewellaway9086 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Charlie,
    Kadee couplings do look a great deal better.
    Once again very well explained.

  • @MrDavil43
    @MrDavil43 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for the demo, Charlie. I have long hated the tension lock couplings and remember with some fondness the old Hornby Dublo ones, provided they were of metal construction and not plastic. They were unforgiving of uneven track and trains would split on excessive undulations, but vehicles could be easily lifted out as with Kadee's. Maybe we could persuade Dominic Cummings to take it up with the industry as he seems to get his way with everything!

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Now there’s a thought. The problem is we’ve been poorly served for so many years. Let’s hope things improve.

  • @Calvertfilm
    @Calvertfilm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting, thanks for explaining Charlie. Laurie.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it Laurie

    • @Calvertfilm
      @Calvertfilm 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChadwickModelRailway I learnt a lot too Charlie - thanks.

  • @seanbaldwin7933
    @seanbaldwin7933 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another awesome vid Charlie, I am in the throws of converting to Kadee myself and have run some wagons so far without any issues of uncoupling in transit (like some of the old Lima couplers eek. There is also to throw another spanner in the works a rotary coupler, yes these look like Kadee and act like them but they also rotate in their "gear box" for people who want to use something like the walthers rotary dumper, rather than uncoupling each wagon. Keep up the great work and yes McKinley Railway when you first mentioned it, amazing layout :).

  • @martaperoy
    @martaperoy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation.

  • @tonyslight826
    @tonyslight826 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Charlie that was very helpful indeed your right on all counts some of these firms just sit on the fence, that's how we lost our motor cycle industry .well you have sold me Charlie i will be swapping over a bit at a time.
    Thank you.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t blame you Tony, my freight wagons are the most important ones, whereas my coaches I will probably switch to magnetic couplings.

    • @tonyslight826
      @tonyslight826 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChadwickModelRailway thanks again Charlie

  • @BeardClipper
    @BeardClipper 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What a great video - thank you very much past-Charlie :)

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      BC, I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it. Regards Charlie

  • @wimbletrain
    @wimbletrain 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks, great video!

  • @andrewdonaldson6225
    @andrewdonaldson6225 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just watched the video and never realised that UK outline manufacturers had such an issue with NEM 362 height. I moved to continental HO and discovered NEM pockets and ROCO close couplers in 1989 and never looked back. I now run stock with Roco close couplers in the rake and Kadees on locos and at the end of rakes. I have had no issues with pocket height across an assortment of manufacturers including Roco, Electrotren, Mabar and Mehano. The use of Kadees on Locos has allowed me to chuck Atlas and Athearn into the mix........!
    I am looking forward to the next video. I am always surprised at exhibitions the lack of 'grown up' couplings on otherwise exceptional layouts and stock.
    Love the channel and have subscribed.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that you enjoyed the video Andrew. If find our couplings to be a total embarrassment.

  • @ianfergalfarrar
    @ianfergalfarrar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video and kinda interesting 👍👍
    I totally agree that the tension lock couplings are dreadful to uncouple and I may consider getting the kadee couplings 👍
    Keep up the good work and I look forward to the next video 👍 👍 👍

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Ian, I’m so pleased that you found it interesting even if it’s not quite what you use.

  • @kyleburkholder6003
    @kyleburkholder6003 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the information. I have not gotten into changing couplers yet and have not looked into anything about couplers myself, you are the only the second person to talk about the kadee guage. The first video I watch said that you should just have the two couplers touch but not connect. Then to see if they are at the correct height you look at the center line on the car and the center of them height guage should be in the same plane.
    To un-couple them you can also use a stick like the one you used at the beginning by inserting it into the couple and giving it a small twist.

  • @ThePeejRR
    @ThePeejRR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One of the greatest advancements in model railroading. In the States we had "slide hook" couplers... they're our version of toy couplings like your tension locks. unreliable things that are almost impossible to couple onto while on a curve and a pain in the arse to uncouple.
    The magnet uncoupling is only useful for a hard to reach spot on your layout, otherwise just use a cocktail stick (no need to lift the car up) so you can uncouple anywhere on the track you'd like. Now KaDees aren't perfect but they definitely are better than other options. Cheers from the States Charlie!!

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Two great comments. Both highlighting what a ridiculous pickle the UK market and Europe for that matter is in.

  • @johnmassey7687
    @johnmassey7687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I put KaDees on all my wagons years ago and have seen a dramatic improvement in running and particually ,as you show shunting .

  • @jamesgilbart148
    @jamesgilbart148 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very useful video. I have found that Kaydee pins can strike point tie bar mechanisms and rip the coupling out of the NEM socket. Some people snip the pin off but bending it upwards makes better sense. Yes, tension locks are rubbish - I frequently have unscheduled slipped coaches with those!

  • @markfisher8206
    @markfisher8206 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent Charlie I have noticed that some modellers have been painting the trip pins on their KD’s to resemble air hoses. Black with a small dab of silver at the end to represent the actual metal coupling.Always enjoy your subject matter cheers.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that you enjoyed it Mark, and an interesting tip too.

  • @jeremywren2190
    @jeremywren2190 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Charlie, these how to videos are invaluable as I get back in to the hobby. I seem to recall that back in the late 60's my Hornby Dublo models had an open coupling similar to the KDs and that the tension lock type were on Triang. Shame if UK modeling went the wrong way back then. (Memory could be flawed!)

    • @davidbayne1079
      @davidbayne1079 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nothing wrong with the memory ( not unless mine has gone as well)....In fact if I dig long enough in the loft I could fine some, along with a converter truck with Triang at one end and Dublo at the other

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      So true Jeremy, one step forward, two steps back!

  • @davidmathie8360
    @davidmathie8360 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Interesting video Charlie .Totally agree with your comment about the couplings in the UK . With the horrendous prices manufacturers are now imposing on us surely its not to much to ask for a decent looking coupling.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that you found the video interesting David. Hopefully one day all rolling stock will have decent couplings. Regards Charlie.

    • @annweshabiswas7709
      @annweshabiswas7709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ChadwickModelRailway টড

  • @terryrobinson7371
    @terryrobinson7371 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Charlie
    Another great video about the kadee coupling which I have been using for about 20 years.
    Couple of thing that maybe worth adding on your next video is the under-track magnet that can be installed on the building of your layout.
    I’m in agreement with you that some locomotives and rolling stock are not easy to replace the old tension lock coupling and replace it with a kadee.
    When I have to use the tension lock I remove one of the hooks which makes it easier to uncouple, in the case of my layout it was at the platform end where I wanted to detach the locomotive.
    My method was to install the Heathcote Electronics uncoupler which uses a servo motor complete with electronics where you are able to adjust the height it pushes clear plastic strip, the speed it moves upwards and the duration of time it remains up to move your locomotive away.
    Keek up the good work and it was nice to say hello to you at Warley
    Terry

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Terry, I’m pleased that you enjoyed it. Yes these couplings are a complete nightmare. Perhaps I’ll see you at Ali Pali.

    • @terryrobinson7371
      @terryrobinson7371 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m not intending to go to Alley Pally I’m exhibiting at Glasgow, York and Derby with my layout Camel Quay

  • @ewoodrailway
    @ewoodrailway 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like these so much. I'm considering using them on my layout

  • @BrockwellLanemodelrailway
    @BrockwellLanemodelrailway 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've used them for years and love them. A4s ,class 33, class 66 , mk1 coaches for example do in real life have buckeye couplers so I'd argue that they are sort of prototypical. I don't use the magnetic uncoupling system so I cut off the bar completely to make them look even less obtrusive.
    I'm often asked to make a video like this but ,never found a way of explaining properly the problems encountered. Viewers tend to ask what number do I use for a certain type of wagon and of cause its not that simple. Great video.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Biele, I’m so pleased that you enjoyed the video. The big four manufacturers have left us in a right pickle.

  • @richardaustin2640
    @richardaustin2640 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice work Charlie. Feel for you and those tension lock "things". For me KD'S are fantastic and given most of the prototype stock in Australia uses knuckle couplings they are a "no brainer" for us down under. They even come as standard on the large array of ready to run stock now available for Australian modelers.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m pleased for you Richard. Sadly back in the UK we have to endure all this rubbish.

  • @uptownphotography
    @uptownphotography 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video as always....

  • @DungeWoodRailway
    @DungeWoodRailway 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Charlie
    I've got to agree with you regarding your comment about the UK manufacturers and the nem pockets, it's a joke and a pain in the bum getting these things to work because they aren't all identical!???.
    Due to the helix on my layout I'm finding more and more I'm having to switch the locomotive to first wagon coupling to kadee to ensure everything stays coupled on either up or down trips. It certainly isn't cheap but its the best solution I've found so far. The other option is the solid coupling.
    I never realised you could bend the kadee bars up, you learn something everyday, thanks.
    Cheers Paul

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Paul, I’m so pleased that you found the Kadee video interesting. The challenges with your helix must make things even more complex. Regards Charlie

  • @moonshinerunner01
    @moonshinerunner01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this video, Now I know what Kadee is all about. Their signage doesn't really explain what and how they work. A really great tip.

  • @jimsmoter4510
    @jimsmoter4510 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Charlie . Living in the States does make coupler buying much easier ,our rail cars come at a more standard height it seems .

  • @simonturner5450
    @simonturner5450 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Charlie, thanks again for another informative and entertaining video. You’ve just started to touch on the elephant in the room here at the end of this video and that is that none of the couplings out there are perfect, every type is a compromise of some sort. Although Kadees work in a more prototypical way they are way too big in scale terms than real buckeye couplers. It all comes down to what matters most to you. So if I put up some criteria you could say: easiest operation = Kadees,, best comparability across manufacturers = tension locks, most realistic = 3 link, least obtrusive automatic coupling = Alex Jackson, cheapest = Spratt and Winkle. So many options each with its good and bad points.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      A very interesting comment Simon. It just shows what a minefield of a subject this is.

  • @musoseven8218
    @musoseven8218 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really interesting video - you're the first person I've seen demo, really well, the uncoupling and coupling capabilities of these couplings. I'm dabbling with KaDee in 0-16.5 and on some 7mm coaches. I'm slowing coming to accept their American looks and, of course with MK1 coaches, Buckeyes are prototypical.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Muso Seven I'm so pleased that you found the video useful.
      Regards Charlie

  • @gibsonethirty2836
    @gibsonethirty2836 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    G'Day Charlie, nicely done again as usual. Mate can you imagine the tediousness of having to convert 350 100Tonn ore cars PER iron ore train - BUT on top of that I have to turn them into full 360° rotating couplings so as the Rotary Ore Dumper can process each wagon as it arrives at the Port! Bulk Packs are my friends! lol

  • @StationRoadModelRailway
    @StationRoadModelRailway 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A very helpful video, thank you. I recently purchased some Kadee couplings from the states and encountered the same issue of different height nem pockets. Good to know some surgery is possible to remedy.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sadly, we just have to make the best of a dreadful situation. Good luck with yours.

  • @williamsquires3070
    @williamsquires3070 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Two possible solutions got your COFC flat car:
    1) instead of mounting the draft gear box onto the truck (bogie), cut the flange off the bogie so you can mount the box to the car body itself; that, and an underset shank coupler, should raise it up enough to clear the coupler height gauge, and allow it to couple with the other cars (wagons), such as those tank cars you started with.
    2) get an American COFC flatcar, and repaint it in the British colors; all the stuff over here is pretty much already equipped with Kadee (or compatible) couplers right out of the box. The only problem here, is that the track gauge is the same, but our HO scale is 1:87.1, whereas OO scale is 1:76, so the American car will be a bit narrower than expected. Also, the containers will be at 1:87 scale as well - they’ll fit loosely on your British COFC car, but the converse is not true; your British containers probably won’t fit the American COFC car, at least not without modification.
    The powdered graphite lubricant comes in handy for other things as well; stock up on some! 😎

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks William, a very useful comment.
      I will certainly check out the mounting of the couplings on the wagon body itself rather than on the biggie.
      Many thanks Charlie.

  • @Zebrails
    @Zebrails 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A pencil... a graphite pencil can also be used to rub/mark where a dry lube can be used, i.e. coupler swing movement, axle points and chambers... doing a little "shaving" of a pencil as such (especially wooden or basic No.2 pencils), since lead was removed from manufacturing of pencils, all the pencils that replaced them can be used. It's the same graphite as is found in that tube of "Greas em"... and, the pliers are called "Coupler Pin Adjusters" and are sized for "N" "HO" and "O" scale coupler pins-to tighten the "curve", whence the three sized-type end. To widen that curve, you must flip handles so as to not bend down the knuckle part of the knuckle coupler.
    John Kamloops, BC Canada

  • @woodsettscentral1196
    @woodsettscentral1196 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Charlie. I use KaDee extensively on my layout. To manage the cost, I only fit them to one end of my diesels, normally to the end that doesn't have a driver, this allows the driver end to be fully detailed with hoses, ploughs etc. I tend to operate my stock fixed rakes of wagons and coaches, to which I attach a KaDee to each end. For long rakes, I will fit a pair of KaDee's in the middle of the rake to allow the rake to be easily split. This enables me to take advantage of "shuffle" uncoupling at various strategic points round the layout. Just some thoughts. Barry

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Barry, I think that we are singing from the same song sheet mate. Regards Charlie.

  • @richardwillcox3571
    @richardwillcox3571 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done Charlie. Excellent presentation. You can use double sided tape to manipulate your NEM couplings and stop coupler droop. You can also use it to adjust the height of the NEM pocket. Not perfect but its cheap and effective. You need the one with a thicker backing. The odd washer under a coupling pocket can also adjust height.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Richard, I have used similar techniques to overcome poor design!

  • @ive595
    @ive595 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have to say, I have been using KayDes for several years, I found it all a bit of a headache to start with but once you get your head around it, it all becomes clear. It's amazing what a difference they make to the look of a rake of 30 wagons, don't be afraid of mixing up lengths on one wagon. I put a short coupling on one end and a medium on the other and as long as the corresponding wagon has the opposite side you can get them even closer without the dreaded buffer lock.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that we truly agree on this awkward dilemma.

  • @daveharriman2756
    @daveharriman2756 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Charlie, I've had to do all of these mods on my wagons, coaches etc, was a real job doing the old stock where there was no NEM pockets, as I model in N gauge, you can guess at the size of the small springs! almost drove me nuts! but worth it, like as you demonstrated , the ability to just lift the stock off the rails is a must have, cheers, Dave

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that you enjoyed the video Dave, they are truly a great asset.

    • @ivovanzon164
      @ivovanzon164 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What was on there in the first place, Arnold Rapido? N is the only scale which had standardized mounts from about day one

    • @daveharriman2756
      @daveharriman2756 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ivovanzon164 it was early farish and Peco wagons that I had to cut the plastic away in the chassis, and use the jig that came with the kit from KD to line them up, as in Charlie's video, newer stock wasn't a problem, as the KD's fit straight in, it was a bit of a tough job, but worth it. hope this helps, cheers, Dave

  • @NOELTM
    @NOELTM 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A better example of "Conscious Uncoupling" - very interesting and useful video - thank you.

  • @davidcurtis5398
    @davidcurtis5398 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here in the US we will sometimes use thin shim washers between the car and the truck to being the coupler more in line with the standard height. Sometimes you can take the center mount coupler (the only ones I have ever used) and bring the couplet up to the proper height. I have had to file off a little of the mounting nub (?) where the truck is screwed into the body of the car to lower the coupler. The low and high mount would sometimes fix the problem but is you need just a little adjustment, you might use the above mentioned system. Again I feel that the best action of the KD is the ability to set out the cars and pull away from them leaving them spotted where you want...

  • @Poliss95
    @Poliss95 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That spring you lost Charlie. I found it in my carpet. :-)

  • @rossmorrow3013
    @rossmorrow3013 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ll try them when I get a chance.
    Many thanks for your help though👍
    ross

  • @andrewpalm2103
    @andrewpalm2103 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Greetings from Wisconsin! I've just subscribed. In the US, the Kadee-style couplers have taken over nearly completely. When I was young most kits and ready-to-run cars and locos came with "NMRA" type couplers, which were hideous looking. All "serious" modellers replaced them with Kadee types. Since Kadee's patents timed out, other manufacturers now make that style, but usually in plastic and not with the variety of types made by Kadee. My layout is a shunting layout and I've used small homemade blades on sticks to do the uncoupling, quite satisfactorily. Cheers. PS. The original Kadees had a straight narrow pin that was less reliable.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for subscribing Andrew, it’s great to have you onboard.

    • @andrewpalm2103
      @andrewpalm2103 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChadwickModelRailway I look forward to more videos. By the way, when I was VERY young, besides NMRA and Kadee couplers there were also Mantua couplers. These had a ring and hook, similar to couplers I see on British models. Mantua was a company that made HO models but is no longer around. Cheers.

  • @medwaypeninsulaMR
    @medwaypeninsulaMR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Charlie as always a very informative video . I agree totally that something as important as coupling the UK has not come that far forward since when I had my first train set 40+ years ago. I don't have tight curves but find the small tension locks cause derailments or unwanted uncoupling. So I have changed to putting mid size tension locks on loco and first wagon/coach. And there is not even a UK standard for tension locks either ..

  • @KingsviewModelRailway
    @KingsviewModelRailway ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very helpful! Sorting these out is a minefield!

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Kingsview, I’m so pleased that you found the video interesting. Regards Charlie

  • @philnewstead5388
    @philnewstead5388 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are quite correct it is about time there is an industry wide standard not only for the fitting of NEM pockets but height and the style of tension lock couplings. There is a group of us here in France who meet up and run our stock on each others layouts and my D600 Warship in particular does not couple well the carriages with the standard Hornby supplied coupling. The couplings on both vehicles are the standard couplings supplied in the box from new.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Phil, yes these wretched couplings are a disaster, if only everything was built to accept Kadee’s at the right height. Stay safe regards Charlie.

  • @animalyze7120
    @animalyze7120 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can mix and match most types of Kadee's depending on what rolling stock you use as each has a different coupler box some bigger or smaller, wider, narrower etc... You may find you need 1 coupler on the front a car then need a different for the back to make it all hook up. Some of these couplers are down right dastardly in putting them together and the included instructions are usually very vague especially pertaining to the springs. Great brand and they have something for everything. Nice video thank you.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes you can mix them, but it is somewhat of a nightmare trying to get the heights exactly right. it really is a case of trial and error. Regards Charlie

  • @pim1234
    @pim1234 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant !

  • @1737sd40
    @1737sd40 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    While in York last May I brought a class 66 loco. Most 66's were built in London Ontario, shipped by train to Halifax for eventual transport to the UK. So in fact Class 66's ran on Canadian rails and I wanted to model this. The conversion from the Hornby coupler to NME Kadee coupler could not have been easier. Actually with CV changes to Hornby decoder the unit pulls quite well and I have it pulling (although not prototypical) a string of 14 Canadian Government of Canada grain cars.

  • @massifheed
    @massifheed 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this video, Charlie. I must have watched it a dozen times, and have wanted to give Kadees a go since I first saw them, but was worried that they just wouldn't work on my combination of sketchy track laying and low end rolling stock.
    However, I bought a couple of different sized NEM variants, and some of the traditional gearbox type Kadees and experimented, and I have to say they are brilliant. I may have been lucky, but generally I've found NEM heights have been spot on or very close. And for non-NEM wagons, the gearbox Kadees have gone in with little work needing to be done.
    Without the clear explanation in this video though, I'd have been stuck, and honestly would never have bothered trying it.
    I have also tried the Hunt couplings, and have had some good results on rakes of coaches by having strategically placed Kadees where I might want to split a train up, or where it will couple with a loco, and then used the Hunt couplings in between.
    Thanks again for the excellent content!

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think we sing from the same song sheet on this one Andrew. I will certainly use magnetic couplings between coaches and Kadee’s at the ends. Regards Charlie

  • @StefanBartelski
    @StefanBartelski 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Charlie, a quick comment on your mention of using #5 Kadees for one of your locos, the #148 that you showed in the video is the whisker equivalent of the #5. Also, if you can adjust all your rolling stock so that they can use centerset couplers, you might like to think about using the semi-scale #158, also a whisker spring shank. Also, over here (I am a transplanted Brit) many modelers remove the coupler pin and use a wooden skewer for uncoupling. When operating our layouts we often have two man crews, engineer and brakeman/conductor. The latter has the skewer to uncouple where ever required, more prototypical.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Stefan, that’s sound advice regarding the Kadee alternatives.
      I’ll be checking them out at the weekend.

  • @alecralph6667
    @alecralph6667 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Many thanks for this video, which confirms my decision to opt for KaDee couplings. To date I have used the NEM type in conjunction with boxes obtained on Ebay for Mainline in particular. In addition I have used No 5s for much older stock. It would appear I should have tried the ones included in the first part.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Alec. I’m so pleased that you found it useful. Kadee’s are the way ahead.

  • @davidgreenwood5160
    @davidgreenwood5160 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video Charlie. We get the same issue in N gauge. Recently bought some Dapol knuckle couplers for nem sockets only to discover that the Dapol coaches I had bought “new” did not have me sockets. Crazy

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I totally agree David, it’s a dreadful situation and all of us modellers feel like victims to the big four companies. Regards Charlie.

  • @alechudson6492
    @alechudson6492 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Charlie
    A while ago you did a video on 3D printed 3 link couplings. I liked these so ordered some. You can use the offset ones to couple the incorrect height nem pockets to the correct height ones and just use Kadees on the end wagons. This also saves some costs on Kadees. As you suggested I make the wagons up in rakes of 3, 4 or 5.

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that you found them useful Alec. They certainly look great.

  • @kellyparkstone3520
    @kellyparkstone3520 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Charlie. Interesting video about the Kadee's. Personally dont use them myself as you say, the hieght problem and number of different couplings types in this country is a mind field. I have ripped everything out and started a fresh and use Sprat & Winkle (looking forward to the next instalment on these) they are good for kitbuilt models as well as RTR.i only fit the " hook" to one end of each wagon. They are impossible to fit to bogie diesel loco's so just use the bar with a couple of double ended wagons to act as a barrier wagon.
    Cheers Colin

    • @ChadwickModelRailway
      @ChadwickModelRailway  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m so pleased that you found the video interesting. I’ll take a look at your couplings next time.