The Fed is too powerful and prominent in financial markets: Independent Institute's Judy Shelton

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 109

  • @Daisy-yr6ez
    @Daisy-yr6ez หลายเดือนก่อน +158

    Every week I buy more of whatever is the lowest percentage of my portfolio and try to keep everything around 10%. Please what could be my safest buys with $400k to outperform the market in 2024?

    • @SirManselus
      @SirManselus หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd avoid the index funds, mutual funds, or specific stocks for the time being. The 5% fixed incomes are the safest bet for now. Save your cash for when the market actually shows sign of recovery.

    • @Charlotte-ew6sw
      @Charlotte-ew6sw หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is why I entrusted a fiduciary with my investmnt decisions. Many underestimate advisors until emotions lead to losses. My advisor crafted a tailored strategy aligning with my long-term goals, guiding entry and exit points for the equities I focus on. This has grown my portfolio to over $850k. My personal best so far

    • @Sophia-bt2uh
      @Sophia-bt2uh หลายเดือนก่อน

      How can I participate in this? I sincerely aspire to establish a secure financial future and am eager to participate. Who is the driving force behind your success?.

    • @Charlotte-ew6sw
      @Charlotte-ew6sw หลายเดือนก่อน

      ANGELA LYNN SCHILLING' is her name. She is regarded as a genius in her area and works for Empower Financial Services. She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.

    • @Sophia-bt2uh
      @Sophia-bt2uh หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for this tip. It was easy to find your coach. Did my due diligence on her before scheduling a phone call with her. She seems proficient considering her resume.

  • @PatyRamírez-z9z
    @PatyRamírez-z9z หลายเดือนก่อน +122

    With around $120k invested in Palantir stocks, any suggestions for additional stocks to diversify across various markets? Looking for a well-rounded portfolio that balances risk aversion with returns meeting yearly inflation concerns.

    • @FolarinSodiq
      @FolarinSodiq หลายเดือนก่อน

      Prioritize two goals: strategically buy stocks to limit losses and maximize gains, and be prepared to capitalize on market shifts. Consult a financial advisor or professional for personalized guidance.

    • @JoeWilmoth-k2w
      @JoeWilmoth-k2w หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FolarinSodiq Certainly, I've been consulting with a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) since the outbreak. Beginning with an initial fund of $80k, my advisor makes decisions on when to enter and exit positions in my portfolio, which has now expanded to around $350k.

    • @PatyRamírez-z9z
      @PatyRamírez-z9z หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JoeWilmoth-k2w Please can you leave the info of your investment advisor here? I’m in dire need of one.

    • @JoeWilmoth-k2w
      @JoeWilmoth-k2w หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PatyRamírez-z9z Victoria Carmen Santaella is the licensed advisor I use. Just search the name. You’ll find the necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.

    • @PatyRamírez-z9z
      @PatyRamírez-z9z หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JoeWilmoth-k2w I will give this a look, thanks a bunch for sharing.

  • @andybuchanan4999
    @andybuchanan4999 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I could not possibly agree more with this woman.

  • @whatmane
    @whatmane หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    It wasn't too long ago the market was hitting all time highs each week & now they're begging for rate cuts.

    • @brad1928
      @brad1928 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@whatmane it’s a constant chase for more from this sociopaths. Most of us are happy with our homes and families, they just care about status and power

    • @gusmanue8337
      @gusmanue8337 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yh because low interest rates is now the heart and soul of the economy unfortunately

    • @SigFigNewton
      @SigFigNewton หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gusmanue8337decades of Reaganomics has left a brittle economy

  • @kenstaggs744
    @kenstaggs744 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Get this lady in charge of reforming our financial institutions and systems!

    • @digitalstories2179
      @digitalstories2179 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What? Hiring a woman is a mistake.

    • @TempoPrimo2023
      @TempoPrimo2023 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      LOL, so she can finish the job from the 2008 financial crisis.

    • @thejeffinvade
      @thejeffinvade หลายเดือนก่อน

      She failed to pass the senate. That's why she is doing the press tour now instead of on the 12 people committee.

    • @xcelpast
      @xcelpast หลายเดือนก่อน

      This lady is so bad that even extreme Republicans couldn’t they behind her lol

    • @bargdaffy1535
      @bargdaffy1535 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah Right, like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan would allow her to do anything. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @PK-uk3gh
    @PK-uk3gh หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Market goes 30 percent up...No issue.
    Market is down 10 percent ... Everyone starts crying on national TV 😂😂😂

    • @MrBearcatjew
      @MrBearcatjew หลายเดือนก่อน

      welfare rich people crying wolf

  • @dalepetersen1166
    @dalepetersen1166 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Yes we should trust the 10 richest people in the world and corporations instead of the government voted in by citizens. Why should we fight for you

    • @Logan-zt8mf
      @Logan-zt8mf หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Fed chair isn't voted in
      Fed staff are appointed
      It's not democratic

    • @TempoPrimo2023
      @TempoPrimo2023 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Logan-zt8mf Its democratic in the sense we elect the person who makes the appointment which is confirmed by the Senate.

    • @mrm7309
      @mrm7309 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The government wasn't voted in. First problem.

    • @mrme3717
      @mrme3717 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The problem is the currency. It's worth nothing.
      The monetary system has evolved since 1694, not by natural forces; but rather by the designs of bankers, who profit by their manipulations.
      Therefore, what you are experiencing today is not what it was in 1940, or in 1900 or in 1860 etc.
      It is important to keep this in mind, that the currency system is still in a state of flux, and ever further manipulated to advantage the banker and politician, and disadvantage further (steal from ) the ignorant common people (99.9%, ) but we the people dont understand this, or the extent to which monetary practices have evolved to steal from us, because in our minds we work for money, our parents worked for money and so did our grandparents, so isn't it all pretty much the same with a little bit of inflation ?
      Hell no ! There have been massive machinations and manipulations designed to harvest your work and energy to the advantage and privilege of a few.
      And because monetary principles are abstracts that cannot be seen with our eyes, they require mental effort to get our heads around. They are in fact, a completely separate topic to practical daily living, yet they effect our daily life totally.
      The first principle to understand is that you have been robbed of real money by successive bankers, because the whole idea of 'Money ' is to hold something of real value as your own property, and to receive something of real value for your labour and productivity.
      But you get nothing, you get zero of value. You get paper, or plastic or electrons for your work and efforts, and these, having no fixed intrinsic value weight or measure, can therefore be manipulated and devalued before you even believe you have it, and faster than you can accumulate it. Devaluation through inflation is the insidious tax your vote or will has NO power to address; the banker alone retains that privilege, and uses it to rob you every second of every year, night and day.
      You have been hood winked by slight of hand and mind into accepting a constantly devaluing IOU for nothing, all at the point of a gun, because 'legal currency ' means, you shall accept this degrading note alone for your labour, or the armed sheriffs will pay you a visit, and commit further theft and violence upon you, as the state retains to itself the Exclusive franchise to exercise violence. When the State does violence, that's OK.
      Your forefathers were paid in real money, Gold and Silver, but the bankers were limited in what they could loan out by metalic money, so they sought to do away with it, and they invented the promissory note, the 'bank note' which promised to be redeemable for a Silver or Gold coin.
      They did this to remove the natural restriction on what they could loan out, because new debt at interest is their primary tool of harvest. Then, gradually, they removed the metal altogether, telling you it was for your own good, because now you could have a booming economy and more commerce, and no limitation on how many hours both you and your partner could work .
      (The 'full employment' mandate simply means you all shall work all of the time until you die, but in the 1700s 6 months work would keep you alive all year if you owned your land. )
      Once they had the Exclusive note printing power, they went to town, printing any amount their bought servants in government wanted, creating the national debt, whereby an unborn child is born in servitude and serfdom to an now $100,000 to $ 150,000 debt to who ?
      That would be the share holders of the Federal Reserve if you live in the United States, or the Central Bank in your country, and also the large private banks, for once government abrogated the currency creation power to both the Central and large private banks, they must then go cap in hand to the banks to build new public infrastructure. So now every county, state and nation has indebted their ' citizens' in totally unpayable debts to the currency creators.
      Meanwhile after Bretton Woods the Federal Reserve sent its agents around the world to ensure that all Central banks were created in its own image, doing exactly what it does, so no one shows them up, even though quite a few Central banks are not privately owned like the Federal Reserve is, yet they still create ALL new Currency as Debt which indebts you, your children and grandchildren forever.
      That is a small taste on the first faulty monetary principle and that's before we talk about the unpayable interest on the new worthless currency that they create for zero cost.
      There are 4 faulty monetary principles in practice that ensure 99.9% will live in servitude to the .1%
      Unless you educate yourself and then teach your children and grandchildren, you will remain enslaved, 70% of your work goes to the bankers and bureaucrats.
      So we bring back Sound Metalic Money by weight and purity, and let it find its own local value.

    • @TempoPrimo2023
      @TempoPrimo2023 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mrm7309 Actually they were, you vote by going to the polls on election day. Not whining about it on an internet post.

  • @donaldharlan3981
    @donaldharlan3981 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    People on CNBC are totally out of their minds.🐖 Everything those people do is wrong.

  • @rustinjarrell2717
    @rustinjarrell2717 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    She was doing great until her last sentence when she said a 50 basis point cut will alarm the markets and be too political. If a 50 point cut is what is needed then that’s what you do.

    • @FrancoM7747
      @FrancoM7747 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't know about the political part. But I believe she's correct about it alarming the markets.

    • @Xyz99899
      @Xyz99899 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Her point is valid, cut rates money printing starts again inflation will rise even more which was the whole point for raising interest rate.

    • @TempoPrimo2023
      @TempoPrimo2023 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Xyz99899Sheldon's point IS NOT valid. She talks out both sides of her mouth. The fact she's worried about political optics is telling. She had little issue with DonOLD blowing out deficits with tax cuts for rich guys before the pandemic. She certainly had not issue with the stimulus for those companies after the fact.

    • @Xyz99899
      @Xyz99899 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TempoPrimo2023 Not valid for you cause you have TDS it couldn't be more obvious lol.

    • @SigFigNewton
      @SigFigNewton หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed. Fear of appearing political being allowed to impact Fed decisions IS “getting political”

  • @KungPowEnterFist
    @KungPowEnterFist หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    If the Fed would have stopped at 4% at the end of 2022, inflation would be double what it is now. This lady cannot be serious. What would have happened in and post GFC without the Fed? We would be in year 16 of the worst depression of all time.

    • @TempoPrimo2023
      @TempoPrimo2023 หลายเดือนก่อน

      BINGO! Thank you, a sane comment on this video.

    • @michaeldavid4572
      @michaeldavid4572 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If Trump did not raise the deficit 8 trillion we would not be in this position

    • @TempoPrimo2023
      @TempoPrimo2023 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michaeldavid4572 Also, a valid point more root cause poiint.

    • @hitpat6179
      @hitpat6179 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey, Donald Rumsfeld lost 2.3 trillion on 10th sep 2001...
      Maybe he could do it again...help the eCONomy out abit??? Do you think that would help???

  • @DsonicJ5672
    @DsonicJ5672 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    She fails to mention how the markets are addicted to quantitative easing

  • @mikeshaunnessey9303
    @mikeshaunnessey9303 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We ran at zero for twenty years with brief interludes when the market got too hot and it go raised briefly.

  • @staroftheshow0
    @staroftheshow0 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Anyone else watching this market correction take place right in front of your eyes?

  • @All-gp3tt
    @All-gp3tt หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Powell should leave, he has behind the curve twice! Remember he said inflation transition?

  • @mangowarrior
    @mangowarrior หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unbridled capitalism wants more deregulation ...

  • @sushibar777
    @sushibar777 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Fed was absurdly slow in raising rates in the mid-2010s, which is the primary contributor to the recent bout of inflation. And now it has been inexcusably slow in lowering rates. It should have begun small cuts late last year or early this year, and should have definitely cut it's benchmark rate by .5% this week, with a strong signal of more to come in September. It is hard to understand why the Fed seems to be such a slow learner. It was defending its zero rates policy long after it was clear that it had served its purpose, and was creating risks for the economy. It seems committed to matching its previous mistake by being slow to lower rates.

  • @infinitelyblessed1778
    @infinitelyblessed1778 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes we want to see the standard processes and procedures for the fed. These need to be written in a manner in which a second grader can understand them and they also need to have quality and controls in place. We are over this Willy Billy nonsense.

  • @humanbeing5300
    @humanbeing5300 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That’s ridiculous, the fed has nothing to do with the markets. The markets themselves and their reaction to the fed determines everything.

  • @kckuc310
    @kckuc310 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are suppose to prevent not act afterwards

  • @joshhill7055
    @joshhill7055 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do u think we are going recession

  • @timhopkins9998
    @timhopkins9998 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I began investing in 1967 the average length that shares of stock were held was 10 years. Today the average length of stock ownership is just six months. The Federal Reserve is the easiest of scape goats for the most recent correction in stock prices. If you bought Eli Lilly shares 11 years at the cost of $51 per share ought you to be upset that Thursday's selling of LLY shares your LLY shares only sell for $792/share? Get real.

  • @retroJake7heDog
    @retroJake7heDog หลายเดือนก่อน

    Keep her safe they will come after her

  • @sweetnibblits2263
    @sweetnibblits2263 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just hodl

  • @erbterb
    @erbterb หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gundlach begs to differ. His view is that the FED follows the 2Y. So the 2Y is to strong for the FED not to follow.
    You could even replace the economists there with a copy-paste-function.
    FEDrate=2Y

    • @erbterb
      @erbterb หลายเดือนก่อน

      The markets are giving Powell his Pivot 2,0. If it goes down till october, they pivot, US apparachiks borrow even more to pay themselves at the taxpayers expense.

    • @SigFigNewton
      @SigFigNewton หลายเดือนก่อน

      So she’s saying that the markets should control rates and you’re saying that they mostly already do?

  • @gammaraypotatoes3307
    @gammaraypotatoes3307 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wall Street is losing too much money

    • @TempoPrimo2023
      @TempoPrimo2023 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's essentially her gripe for the moment.

  • @DavidJSmithCT
    @DavidJSmithCT หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The top 10% hold about 86.9% of the stock market which means it can be manipulated very easily. Thats whats happening and everyone knows it.

  • @michaeldavid4572
    @michaeldavid4572 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I waited for the Fed and waited and waited Sold everything yesterday Said too much bla bla

  • @sp4604
    @sp4604 หลายเดือนก่อน

    its crashing and kamel toe ho has no clue what to do

  • @titusp9488
    @titusp9488 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Joe says Fed should not intervene but at the same time should help. Kernan is an idiot, the Fed is a real institution and we live in a real market, things change and free mark need price discovery and Fed needs to figure out what rates are appropriate.

  • @MOliveira-m5h
    @MOliveira-m5h หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's funny how they tell the FED what to do and never did wrong themselves. If bank spent 8 years giving crazy mortgages, and there is crash, bubble bursting, or ponzi scheme blowing up they start advising the FED on interest rates or blame the FED. What they have to look out for is if jobs are added and inflation goes up they maybe no productive jobs and it's as good as handing out welfare checks. It's like if you're running a business and you add jobs but they are no show jobs, and you lose money. Inflation can be the same as losing money in a business because you're not getting real improvements in productivity. Giving loans that people don't pay back is also the same as giving people interest for doing nothing.

  • @kckuc310
    @kckuc310 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are useless they failed their mission

  • @deliverydashcam5002
    @deliverydashcam5002 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Bitcoin fixes this

    • @bdegrds
      @bdegrds หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bitcoin has crashed 70% plus 3x times in only 10 years, it's a pump and dump

    • @TempoPrimo2023
      @TempoPrimo2023 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      NO IT DOESN'T IT JUST ANOTHER GRIFT.

    • @FrancoM7747
      @FrancoM7747 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Crypto is getting slammed today too.

    • @KStutsman
      @KStutsman หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are definitely all thinking about Bitcoin as the only viable alternative while they have this conversation.

    • @Xyz99899
      @Xyz99899 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KStutsman they already have something called GOLD

  • @PK-uk3gh
    @PK-uk3gh หลายเดือนก่อน

    Remember 2009? That's why the Fed is kept powerful....people and organizations with money power will bankrupt individual investors and Retail with schemes and plans easily without Fed, SEC oversight and controls !
    Keeping market free completelu is nothing but giving 10 biggies like Black Rock to determine the whole game...😂😂

  • @ZeroCool33
    @ZeroCool33 หลายเดือนก่อน

    dems are doing a great job.. Keep up the good work for disaster..

  • @amirbazal9897
    @amirbazal9897 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How can those legal criminals aka politicians make millions otherwise 😂

  • @JM-if1mo
    @JM-if1mo หลายเดือนก่อน

    She doesn't know.

  • @bdegrds
    @bdegrds หลายเดือนก่อน

    During Trumps term there was 7 straight months of sub 100k job growth

  • @user-eh5gz7pg7j
    @user-eh5gz7pg7j หลายเดือนก่อน

    سجيلات أخرى
    Let's dance in style, let's dance for a while
    Heaven can wait, we're only watching the skies
    Hoping for the best but expecting the worst
    Are you gonna drop the bomb or not?

  • @drewghelfi8446
    @drewghelfi8446 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wasn’t she nominated by Trump and blocked by the Senate lol? She wanted gold standard now she doesn’t?

    • @SigFigNewton
      @SigFigNewton หลายเดือนก่อน

      What were the senate’s objections to her?

  • @brad1928
    @brad1928 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ohh yes, so let’s go back to an economy that opens us up to another Great Depression! GREAT IDEA!!

  • @EthelbertCoyote
    @EthelbertCoyote หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Fed doesn't has enough power, that is why it takes so long to steer the economy. The fed should never be a political body. I would not beopposed to both a political and non political side of economic controls with different tools. Economic bodies will always form towards protectionism (and therefore economic devistation) of itself if they controlled by a political body if it is allowed to in totality. This guest proves why censorship is wrong, we need all the dangerous and or stupid people and ideas to be known and spoken freely, so they can be debated and exposed.

  • @michaelc1063
    @michaelc1063 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BECKY SO FINE! 😍🔥

  • @bargdaffy1535
    @bargdaffy1535 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well if Congress did something about Inflation like a Windfall Profits Tax you wouldn't need such high Interest Rates. You can't have Sound Monetary Policy without Sound Fiscal Policy and Powell has warned since the Co~Vid years about inaction in Congress.