The boat which sank at 01:04 was called "Moornixe" and sank due to a strong thunderstorm in Lake Baldeney (germany), during which she had torn herself loose from the dock. She drifted towards the weir and sank. Has nothing to do with "Idiots in Boats".
This could have been great if not for the appalling editing. Some clips, much these vessels, ran over one another. Other clips were repeated three to four times. Would have been interesting to know if the Coastguard crew were okay following their vessel being capsized by the ship. Also the condition of the adolescent riding the JetSki who was blinded by the sun and struck a boat!?
Oregon Coast Guard is a national leader today. All them are awesome. The I-5 Columbia River Bridge project is officially put on hold. BAD engineering 4 the most part. King James got it right. Bearing false witness includes the telling of half/truths embellished to be the whole truth. Just stop driving your damn cars everywhere.
I was a commercial fisherman and, my buddy and I were sitting atop the flying bridge. It was after midnight so we could see off in the distance, the lights off a cruise ship about 12 miles away. My buddy told me to hold on tight in around an hour. That's when the wake of the cruise ship hit our boat and scared the 💩 outta me! 😂😅
Everybody makes mistakes ( nobody is perfect ....my name is 'Nobody' 😅) & to be fair , i see facts that happened & were recorded. I do not hear any criticism words ,mainly reasons of failure or incident.
When fully loaded oil tankers approaching Rotterdam harbour, they can shut down their engines at 30 Km / +/- 19 Miles distance as the mass keep on pressing forward.. No need to mentioned a cargo ship on close distance can't be corrected when running in the wrong direction.
That first one at 0:25 where the boat is slowly sinking but then the water breaks through the cargo hatch and snaps the ship's back... frightening how fast she goes down at that point. She hits the bottom with some speed!
Many bulk carriers were mysteriously lost in the 1970s. Eventually, it was found that catastrophic failures with subsequent sinking in matter of seconds were the reason rather like this video shows.
@@blackout9126BRUH NOT EVERY SHIP SINKING, SPLITTING, IMPLODING, ETC, IS TITANIC. To be honest, Titanic was a horrible disaster. But its still really overrated.
What surprised me the most was how many of these incidents were repeated several times in this video. Without all the repeats, this would probably be 15 minutes long.
There, there, Paco! Let me talk down to you in nothing but saccharine platitudes. Reminds me of that Daily Dose of Internet guy and how after all crashes and everything, he always says that no one was hurt, no animals were hurt. Don't want to hurt the ears of 6 year olds with real life. Jesus, Mary and her cuck Joe.
I was fast forwarding through the whole thing looking for that too... disappointed not to see it. And, they repeated at least 4 of them too. Waste of my time
My family had a 55' Grebe (a '70s-ish wood hull yacht) in the late '90s. No bow thrusters, just 2 screws and lots of horses to turn em. I spent a lot of time at the helm of that boat and never once did I wish for a bow thruster. Ships absolutely need bow thrusters, but below 100', it's just a luxury. I seriously doubt any of these crashes would have been prevented with bow thrusters because they're mostly human error.
The problem with bow-thrusters are that they don't work at speeds higher that two to three knots. Most of the ships we see here have higher speeds than that. So sorry no help there. The most important thing to remember is that in good time reduce your speed and plan your manoeuvrers in good time. Any manoeuver takes time before you get the effect you want. When in port always go slow and if you are a large ship, take assistance of tugboats - let them tug you and keep your engine still except for short thrusts of five to ten seconds.
@@christerj7138 In some of those clips a bow or stern thruster would have worked. However I do agree with the rest of what you said. After 50 yrs on the water not one accident !
Yep, he was high as a kite and started to lower the bridge thinking that the ship cleared. It took quite awhile for the Allanburg Bridge to be open to both cars and ships again.
13 year old on jet ski: You can find it on TH-cam as the MN jet ski accident. It was the kids second day on the jet ski and didn’t see the boat until the last second because of an obstruction of view. Guy on boat jumped out and neither had any injuries, he says they were both lucky and had the kid been a foot to the left the story would have been different.
It's probably cheaper for owners of super yachts to crash into other boats, than a concrete dock. People owning the small boats might not see it that way
I served 42 years in the merchant navy. I’ve seen a few expensive collisions, but fortunately no loss of life or injuries. One time in Alexandria, Egypt, a large wooden barge tied up to us without permission. During the night ballast water overflowed from our deck, spilled into the barge, and sank it, still tied up to us. Those mooring ropes sure were tight! A day later, the barge was gone. Presumably relfoated and towed away, I don’t know how😂.
That's a wild story thanks for sharing New York city here the building falling on 911 was No joke I saw it happening on my way to work??? I thought the world ending???
At 8:09 collision: International and Inland Rules state that when two power-driven vessels are crossing the vessel which has the other on her starboard side (the give-way vessel) must keep out of the way. As the give-way vessel it is your duty to avoid a collision. Typically, this means you must alter speed and/or direction to cross behind the other vessel (the stand-on vessel). Back in the day, 60's and 70's and if memory serves me the burdened vessel has the other vessel on it's starboard side as this was known as approaching within "two points abaft the starboard beam." In this case the vessel that passed port to starboard (from left to right) is at fault.
Ya that's a really confusing way of saying the person to the right has the right of way. It's the same as 4-Way intersections. If three vehicles come to a 4-Way intersection the vehicle to the right has the right of way. Look to your right, is there a vehicle? You wait. Don't see a vehicle? Your turn. The reasoning for this is that the driver of the right-of-way vehicle is on the left side of the vehicle. If an impact occurs they are at the highest risk as their side of the vehicle could be hit and the driver has more chance of being injured. If the person who does not have the right of way goes then their passenger side could be hit. The person who has the highest chance be being injured in a side impact accident is therefore given the right of way. If two people are stubborn and just hit the gas then one person is taking a higher risk than the other and the law was developed to protect lives.
@@MultiTurbonoob Sorry, but your reasoning for WHY these rules are like this is incorrect for maritime purposes. For power vessels (such as those in the video), the driver is on the RIGHT side of the boat, not the left. The reason you give way to the boat to your starboard is that you have a much better field of view to starboard than you do to port, so the the boat on the left is more likely to see the boat on the right and therefore gives way. As the OP stated, this changes if you're too far abaft of the other craft because again, they won't see you if you're approaching from the stern, so then whoever is behind gives way regardless of side. Of course, all these rules are only for two, powered pleasure craft as rules quickly change when a boat under sail, a fishing vessel trawling and various other types and sizes of ships are involved. Basically, keep you motor boat out of the way!
The from which the video was shot was the "stand-on" vessel and the other was the "burdened" or give-way vessel. But the bottom line is that both had the duty to avoid the collision.
Sad to tell you that it has nothing to do with cross roads, it is the rules of sailing that Port tack gives way to Starboard tack unless the vessel on Port cannot maneuver for some reason@@MultiTurbonoob
7:17 - That "$25 million dollar yacht" that lurched from the fuel dock caused a hell of a lot more than just $100 thousand dollars worth of damage!!! Hell, just 1 of the sailboats it plowed over would account for more than that!
@@wallyman292 I figured that. My response was aimed at the person on the video, and I used your response to make the point. And also agree with your damage assessment.
Look this one up......HMAS Melbourne (R21) was a Majestic-class light aircraft carrier operated by the Royal Australian Navy from 1955 until 1982, and was the third and final conventional aircraft carrier to serve in the RAN. Melbourne was the only Commonwealth naval vessel to sink two friendly warships in peacetime collisions. The Army won that year!
The small yacht crossing the bow of the larger yacht with the camera was coming towards the larger yacht's port side, so the smaller yacht was at fault, as it was the "give Way" vessel.
I feel so bad for these people, their families, the horror. My prayers are with you for peace. I hope by sharing these videos, more action is taken to prevent as much of these from happening again. How easy something can go wrong there is nothing you can do about it unless you are Superman. Accidents happens and if you see something about to happen or going to; say something, because maybe you are the only one who does.
Quite interesting footage! However the term "tanker" was often used for ships beeing something different (conventional cargo ship, container vessel, bulk carrier, etc.).
*The damage caused by that "$25 million dollar yacht" which lurched from the fuel dock was far more than just $100 thousand dollars. Just one of the sailboats it plowed over would account for more than that!* 😃
Seriously! Does he mean they just throttled it up and walked away from the wheel? I mean thats technically cruise control i guess but who on earth would do that
@@intermixturemusic On all larger ships you got autopilot that keeps the course until you change the course or switch it off. You probably also have autopilot on multimillion yachts. The speed you set with a lever that do not snap back to stop when you take away your hand from it. So, yes you can set the speed and course and walk away (to eat your dinner or sleep or whatever). The ship will chug on unsupervised till it hits land or has no fuel left.
You can find it on TH-cam as the MN jet ski accident. It was the kids second day on the jet ski and didn’t see the boat until the last second because of an obstruction of view. Guy on boat jumped out and neither had any injuries, he says they were both lucky and had the kid been a foot to the left the story would have been different.
@@EneriGiilaan: Yes, they are. If they cannot do this without sinking, they fail quality control and are illegal to sell. The passengers are strapped into their seats with a 4 point seatbelt for all occupants. A car only has 3 point seatbelts, for comparison.
@@solbu-1973 Well ... I'm still not convinced that the *somersault* is part of the "standard method" to launch. The boats are indeed sturdy and designed to protect the passengers while taking all kinds of abuse when launched from a rolling ship in to a stormy sea. But in this test here we have a very controlled and calm conditions. But of course I can be wrong - in that case I will be more than pleased if you - or anyone else - could provide link to some documentation or other backing material.
The thumbnail is Niagara Falls. I figured it had to be fake, but I was surprised when I looked it up and saw how many people (not boats) have gone over the falls in my lifetime. What was even more surprising was how many of them survived.
Amazing how many boat wrecks there are and how easy they happen when not paying attention. I am sure there are many more that is never heard about. The oceans are filled with wrecks of all kinds of things.
Captains of those huge ships face a lot of trouble if they cause a collision through negligence. Some countries will even imprison the captain (which I believe happened to the captain of the ship at 4:37 ...and 22:00 ...I guess?). Captains of those huge ships are usually pretty on point so collisions are relatively rare. Civilian boating, however, doesn't require a special license so there's lots of collisions there. Often from someone with more money than brains who don't realize it's not the same as driving a car. I worked at a dock for a summer in the 90's and we rarely had a day without at least one "woopsie".
@@watchyourtimeco1 Still the one in a small boat have the same responsibilities as the captain on a large supertanker. And he will be judged by the same laws as the captain of said ship.
I am assuming 6.1 million views is from the trolling picture, but everybody knew that boat wasn't going over the falls, right? I also agree about the editing done a bit sloppy. There are some good pictures and videos so it's worth the time.
Whoever gave this video the greenlight and, most specifically, the editor, need a refresher on how to make a video. This, though riveting, was a joke...
Parents who allow underage children to play on Jet Skis should be arrested. Each recreational lake, river, or whatever needs to make it’s own laws. I’ve boated on lakes and rivers for 65 years and I can tell you that most 13 year olds are too young to make good decisions. That includes me at that age and all my kids who are grown now.
The first three rules of boating. Safety, safety, safety. The two best days of your boating life. The day you buy your boat and the day you sell your boat. Been there done that for 13 years. We had a lot of great memories on our boat. The day I sold it, I was extremely happy.
Did anyone see the boat go over the Falls? I could feel my heart go into my chest visualizing it happening. However, there was no footage to show it actually happening that I could find. Did I miss it? Will l have to rewind this video? Did somebody trick me into watching this video? Even though, I am wondering how any ship could get as far as they did. How easy it was having a disaster. It appeared that many were going too fast and did not seem to know where they were heading. I hope whistles were blown and horns blasted for people to get out quickly before being rammed into or crashed. How many lives were lost in any of these that could have been prevented if proper procedures were followed. What seems to be the problem? There has to be a link somewhere if anyone is looking. Not being there to find out more details, I do know this. For one, they have to have 2-way radio communication for navigation 2. There has to be warning markers in the area, to stay left, right and the speed 3. There is usually a pilot boat directing ships around other ships and dangerous areas 4. There are lookouts around the ship looking for danger. 5. In port leaving and docking. There is normally someone standing by for the lines. How was it possible to have so many people involved, not prevent an incident? Are ships short staffed from Covid-19 or some other reason to have one person; perhaps, do it all.
This would've been a great compulation if you hadn't tried to fit 80 clips into a 29+ min video! Way too many glitches with a few repeats of video. It's too bad really, cuz you have a great narrators voice 👍 Sure do hope your other vids, ( this is my first viewing of you're channel ) hold many candles to this one. 🌎 ❤ ✌
What surprises me the most is that captains on a vessel with a rudder problem seemingly don’t use the engines to prevent the vessel from colliding. Full throttle into a dock or other vessel is not only due to rudder problems.
Amazing how many "faults" develop while bridges are unmanned or manned by inexperienced or drunk navigators. The problem is that such negligence causes huge amounts of pollution and yet no-one goes to gaol.
I understand it's difficult to drive a boat let alone operate a massive ship but how do you have 20,000 SQ miles to navigate and still manage to hit another ship? Unless the waters are choppy, weather is gnarly and you may or may not have a mechanical failure, then I don't get how that happens.
I was on a aircraft carrier off Singapore 14 people on the bridge only one. Non-rate saw that we were going to over take them and cut them in half. A 18ft hole in our bow, broad day light 60 mile visibility. Captain fired in less than a week.
The ONLY place that I can see it happening is when maneuvering around docks and they have mechanical issues like no reverse or whatever!! The rest are just not paying attention or complete DUMBASS'S!!!
Watching these videos is an eye opener, that while we assume boat captains are trained and skilled to operate a boat or ship, that just isn't the case !
In fact, there are captains who have not gone to school and do not have any certification documents, but their laxity still allows them to control the ship at sea or carry passengers.
![[MV] A leap of faith...ความเชื่อใจครั้งสุดท้าย (From "Petrichor the series")](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U1piZH2CNXA/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 88 | คู่เอก "ป้อมเพชร vs อัสลามจอน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ZqTVVbMgbo/mqdefault.jpg)
wheres the boat going over a waterfall then ? wasting my time
The boat which sank at 01:04 was called "Moornixe" and sank due to a strong thunderstorm in Lake Baldeney (germany), during which she had torn herself loose from the dock. She drifted towards the weir and sank. Has nothing to do with "Idiots in Boats".
This could have been great if not for the appalling editing.
Some clips, much these vessels, ran over one another.
Other clips were repeated three to four times.
Would have been interesting to know if the Coastguard crew were okay following their vessel being capsized by the ship.
Also the condition of the adolescent riding the JetSki who was blinded by the sun and struck a boat!?
Definitely needs to go back to editing.
I agree, and someone telling us what's about to happen, way to ruin any surprises.
Oregon Coast Guard is a national leader today.
All them are awesome. The I-5 Columbia River Bridge
project is officially put on hold. BAD engineering 4 the most part.
King James got it right. Bearing false witness includes the
telling of half/truths embellished to be the whole truth.
Just stop driving your damn cars everywhere.
No bonus for the scriptwriter. Repeated clips, giving different stories for each.
worst edited youtube video I've seen in a while
I was a commercial fisherman and, my buddy and I were sitting atop the flying bridge. It was after midnight so we could see off in the distance, the lights off a cruise ship about 12 miles away. My buddy told me to hold on tight in around an hour. That's when the wake of the cruise ship hit our boat and scared the 💩 outta me! 😂😅
Your editors are asleep at the wheel. Repeat sequences, portions that cut out after 2 seconds. Bad timing when criticizing mistakes of others...
😂
😂😂no joke
Everybody makes mistakes ( nobody is perfect ....my name is 'Nobody' 😅) & to be fair , i see facts that happened & were recorded. I do not hear any criticism words ,mainly reasons of failure or incident.
When fully loaded oil tankers approaching Rotterdam harbour, they can shut down their engines at 30 Km / +/- 19 Miles distance as the mass keep on pressing forward.. No need to mentioned a cargo ship on close distance can't be corrected when running in the wrong direction.
Just our attention spans from staring at screens for hours!!
It’s almost like your editors were previously captains of some of these boats.
😂
best part of the video is the repeats that have different descriptions and locations...
These moments show how quickly things can go wrong without proper preparation
It's amazing how many times you show the same ships and the same accidents in 1 video.
There's nothing amazing about that.
Breaking in 1/2 way out in the ocean and plus in storm is about most terrifying😨
And plus in addition also too must be a lot scary!
Where is the clip of the boat going over the falls?? False advertising!!
Plus a lot of the clips repeat at the halfway point.
And the editing is just horrible.
Was that just a second so we'd watch your video you guys suck
That first one at 0:25 where the boat is slowly sinking but then the water breaks through the cargo hatch and snaps the ship's back... frightening how fast she goes down at that point. She hits the bottom with some speed!
It shows how easy the Edmond Fitzgerald sank.
Exact same thing as the titanic
Many bulk carriers were mysteriously lost in the 1970s. Eventually, it was found that catastrophic failures with subsequent sinking in matter of seconds were the reason rather like this video shows.
@@blackout9126BRUH NOT EVERY SHIP SINKING, SPLITTING, IMPLODING, ETC, IS TITANIC.
To be honest, Titanic was a horrible disaster. But its still really overrated.
@@Bighead_Joe No one asked you bro
"Hello Coastguard? What should I do?"
Coastguard: "Just hang on, it'll be over in a minute."
What surprised me the most was how many of these incidents were repeated several times in this video. Without all the repeats, this would probably be 15 minutes long.
LOL ..... yup
T D's for me, thumbnail
yup. waste of time. and where was the vid of the thumbnail? (only reason I clicked on this 30 minute snooze fest)
The scriptwriter might try to remember his audience is likely not in grade school! Best of luck!
There, there, Paco! Let me talk down to you in nothing but saccharine platitudes. Reminds me of that Daily Dose of Internet guy and how after all crashes and everything, he always says that no one was hurt, no animals were hurt. Don't want to hurt the ears of 6 year olds with real life. Jesus, Mary and her cuck Joe.
What happen to the opening splash screen with the boat going over the waterfall?
I was fast forwarding through the whole thing looking for that too... disappointed not to see it. And, they repeated at least 4 of them too. Waste of my time
Big waste of my time. I will not subscribe to crap like this that lures you in to watch there repeats..
That's "Artists Conception" of what went down.
It's amazing how much the bow thrusters could have prevented many of these accidents. Some people have no business driving a boat of any size !
I bet almost, if not all, of the yachts have bow thrusters. The captain knows how to use them, but the owner does not.
My family had a 55' Grebe (a '70s-ish wood hull yacht) in the late '90s. No bow thrusters, just 2 screws and lots of horses to turn em. I spent a lot of time at the helm of that boat and never once did I wish for a bow thruster. Ships absolutely need bow thrusters, but below 100', it's just a luxury. I seriously doubt any of these crashes would have been prevented with bow thrusters because they're mostly human error.
The problem with bow-thrusters are that they don't work at speeds higher that two to three knots. Most of the ships we see here have higher speeds than that. So sorry no help there. The most important thing to remember is that in good time reduce your speed and plan your manoeuvrers in good time. Any manoeuver takes time before you get the effect you want. When in port always go slow and if you are a large ship, take assistance of tugboats - let them tug you and keep your engine still except for short thrusts of five to ten seconds.
@@christerj7138 In some of those clips a bow or stern thruster would have worked. However I do agree with the rest of what you said. After 50 yrs on the water not one accident !
How is it possible to be so stupid? Because of the insurance?
Absolutely mind-blowing footage! I couldn't look away from these shocking Idiots In Boats
The clip of the ship running under the bridge as it lowered was actually the fault of the bridge operator, NOT the ship's captain.
Yep, he was high as a kite and started to lower the bridge thinking that the ship cleared. It took quite awhile for the Allanburg Bridge to be open to both cars and ships again.
@@Wytch1 Jesus loves you 🪷🪼🐾🐡🐚🌸⚘️🐳🐬🦋🪻🌷
P license
Correct. The ship was eventually scrapped.
Thank you...I didn't know that & the assumption is always that the boat is at fault.
I learned years ago that the best free entertainment is at any boat ramp
13 year old on jet ski: You can find it on TH-cam as the MN jet ski accident. It was the kids second day on the jet ski and didn’t see the boat until the last second because of an obstruction of view. Guy on boat jumped out and neither had any injuries, he says they were both lucky and had the kid been a foot to the left the story would have been different.
Wow! Glad to hear that. Looking at it, I thought it was a very bad injury to say the least. Wheeew!
It's neat that all the negligent ship captains came together to edit this video.
It's probably cheaper for owners of super yachts to crash into other boats, than a concrete dock. People owning the small boats might not see it that way
Not if someone is in any of the boats. Lawsuits up the wazoo.
This is the best "craziest" footage I ever seen. Thumbs up for this channel
I served 42 years in the merchant navy. I’ve seen a few expensive collisions, but fortunately no loss of life or injuries. One time in Alexandria, Egypt, a large wooden barge tied up to us without permission. During the night ballast water overflowed from our deck, spilled into the barge, and sank it, still tied up to us. Those mooring ropes sure were tight! A day later, the barge was gone. Presumably relfoated and towed away, I don’t know how😂.
Whatever these pilots were smoking ,I hope they brought enough for everyone .
So much for a proper deckwatch on your vessel. Nothing to be proud of.
yeah right, accidental ballast water flowed onto the barge. you sank it!
That's a wild story thanks for sharing New York city here the building falling on 911 was No joke I saw it happening on my way to work??? I thought the world ending???
I found this video by accident, and I'm so glad I did.
Great original content and quite a different video theme. Only problem was you repeated a lot of same clips within this video.
Many of the clips have been shown in other videos, but you're right there are a LOT of repeats!
VIDEO : Anchor breaking off.
NARRATOR :"This is the sound of an anchor breaking off!"
ME : "Is. It."
Now I know why the Edmond Fitzgerald went down so fast in the great lakes of America. You have no time to even get to a lifeboat.
Well the weather was a little dicey before the Fitzgerald went down. Ships sink faster when they break in half
Wow, what a mess. Sad.
At 8:09 collision: International and Inland Rules state that when two power-driven vessels are crossing the vessel which has the other on her starboard side (the give-way vessel) must keep out of the way. As the give-way vessel it is your duty to avoid a collision. Typically, this means you must alter speed and/or direction to cross behind the other vessel (the stand-on vessel). Back in the day, 60's and 70's and if memory serves me the burdened vessel has the other vessel on it's starboard side as this was known as approaching within "two points abaft the starboard beam." In this case the vessel that passed port to starboard (from left to right) is at fault.
Ya that's a really confusing way of saying the person to the right has the right of way. It's the same as 4-Way intersections. If three vehicles come to a 4-Way intersection the vehicle to the right has the right of way. Look to your right, is there a vehicle? You wait. Don't see a vehicle? Your turn. The reasoning for this is that the driver of the right-of-way vehicle is on the left side of the vehicle. If an impact occurs they are at the highest risk as their side of the vehicle could be hit and the driver has more chance of being injured. If the person who does not have the right of way goes then their passenger side could be hit. The person who has the highest chance be being injured in a side impact accident is therefore given the right of way. If two people are stubborn and just hit the gas then one person is taking a higher risk than the other and the law was developed to protect lives.
@@MultiTurbonoob Sorry, but your reasoning for WHY these rules are like this is incorrect for maritime purposes. For power vessels (such as those in the video), the driver is on the RIGHT side of the boat, not the left. The reason you give way to the boat to your starboard is that you have a much better field of view to starboard than you do to port, so the the boat on the left is more likely to see the boat on the right and therefore gives way. As the OP stated, this changes if you're too far abaft of the other craft because again, they won't see you if you're approaching from the stern, so then whoever is behind gives way regardless of side. Of course, all these rules are only for two, powered pleasure craft as rules quickly change when a boat under sail, a fishing vessel trawling and various other types and sizes of ships are involved. Basically, keep you motor boat out of the way!
@@smgdfcmfah Good stuff thanks for the info.
The from which the video was shot was the "stand-on" vessel and the other was the "burdened" or give-way vessel. But the bottom line is that both had the duty to avoid the collision.
Sad to tell you that it has nothing to do with cross roads, it is the rules
of sailing that Port tack gives way to Starboard tack unless the vessel
on Port cannot maneuver for some reason@@MultiTurbonoob
Was waiting for the one in the thumbnail!
7:17 - That "$25 million dollar yacht" that lurched from the fuel dock caused a hell of a lot more than just $100 thousand dollars worth of damage!!! Hell, just 1 of the sailboats it plowed over would account for more than that!
You are right about the damage being more than $100K but wrong about the $25 million price tag for that yacht.
@@grehm7125 I was repeating what was said in the video, hence the quotes! ;)
@@wallyman292 I figured that. My response was aimed at the person on the video, and I used your response to make the point. And also agree with your damage assessment.
Jim is funny !😅
Very funny
This repeats itself, not in a loop but just several instances repeated.
I didn't see the yacht going over the waterfall???????
Look this one up......HMAS Melbourne (R21) was a Majestic-class light aircraft carrier operated by the Royal Australian Navy from 1955 until 1982, and was the third and final conventional aircraft carrier to serve in the RAN. Melbourne was the only Commonwealth naval vessel to sink two friendly warships in peacetime collisions. The Army won that year!
Voyager 1964 and Frank E Evans 1969. I served in Melbourne between these dates and she carried the scars of the earlier incident.
The small yacht crossing the bow of the larger yacht with the camera was coming towards the larger yacht's port side, so the smaller yacht was at fault, as it was the "give Way" vessel.
I feel so bad for these people, their families, the horror. My prayers are with you for peace. I hope by sharing these videos, more action is taken to prevent as much of these from happening again. How easy something can go wrong there is nothing you can do about it unless you are Superman. Accidents happens and if you see something about to happen or going to; say something, because maybe you are the only one who does.
It is hard to believe these self-proclaimed "mechanical failures."
Quite interesting footage! However the term "tanker" was often used for ships beeing something different (conventional cargo ship, container vessel, bulk carrier, etc.).
It was misspelled. The word actually starts with s "w".
So, now you know where your Aliexpress packages ended up
The title should say. “Idiots photo shopping a thumbnail.”
*The damage caused by that "$25 million dollar yacht" which lurched from the fuel dock was far more than just $100 thousand dollars. Just one of the sailboats it plowed over would account for more than that!* 😃
The dock alone is millions
You copied the comment above
You gotta be careful when you cut all these clips together.. cuts out in the middle of the sentence.. >:( *sigh*
they did that multiple times. not to mention showing the same clip twice...
@@Avanyiza Multiple repeated clips, different made up story each time. 🤣
The consequences of the accident are very serious.
That kid on the jetski definitely broke some bones that was brutal
This one brought tears to my eyes
Where’s the dad
Actually, he was fine
He ended up passing away a few hours later. There was a wire on the left of the boat that slit his throat.
Where's the feature incident, I watch all this stuff waiting for that?
I have been around a lot of boats through out my life and have never seen cruise control on any of them
Seriously! Does he mean they just throttled it up and walked away from the wheel? I mean thats technically cruise control i guess but who on earth would do that
@@intermixturemusic On all larger ships you got autopilot that keeps the course until you change the course or switch it off. You probably also have autopilot on multimillion yachts. The speed you set with a lever that do not snap back to stop when you take away your hand from it. So, yes you can set the speed and course and walk away (to eat your dinner or sleep or whatever). The ship will chug on unsupervised till it hits land or has no fuel left.
Classic. The teaser pic showing a boat looming over waterfall is not part of the video.
might I ask what happened to the 13 year old on the jet ski? Were they okay? Did they survive?
You can find it on TH-cam as the MN jet ski accident. It was the kids second day on the jet ski and didn’t see the boat until the last second because of an obstruction of view. Guy on boat jumped out and neither had any injuries, he says they were both lucky and had the kid been a foot to the left the story would have been different.
I thought there was only one boy on the jet ski
80? Count again. This was a waste of time.
1:26 is actually not a fail but a, albeit strange, standard method to launch these small rescue vessels
You mean - they are meant to bounce back and somersault like that???
@@EneriGiilaan: Yes, they are.
If they cannot do this without sinking, they fail quality control and are illegal to sell.
The passengers are strapped into their seats with a 4 point seatbelt for all occupants. A car only has 3 point seatbelts, for comparison.
@@solbu-1973 Well ... I'm still not convinced that the *somersault* is part of the "standard method" to launch. The boats are indeed sturdy and designed to protect the passengers while taking all kinds of abuse when launched from a rolling ship in to a stormy sea. But in this test here we have a very controlled and calm conditions.
But of course I can be wrong - in that case I will be more than pleased if you - or anyone else - could provide link to some documentation or other backing material.
The thumbnail is Niagara Falls. I figured it had to be fake, but I was surprised when I looked it up and saw how many people (not boats) have gone over the falls in my lifetime. What was even more surprising was how many of them survived.
A lot of repeat incidents in this video.
Amazing how many boat wrecks there are and how easy they happen when not paying attention. I am sure there are many more that is never heard about. The oceans are filled with wrecks of all kinds of things.
Captains of those huge ships face a lot of trouble if they cause a collision through negligence. Some countries will even imprison the captain (which I believe happened to the captain of the ship at 4:37 ...and 22:00 ...I guess?). Captains of those huge ships are usually pretty on point so collisions are relatively rare.
Civilian boating, however, doesn't require a special license so there's lots of collisions there. Often from someone with more money than brains who don't realize it's not the same as driving a car. I worked at a dock for a summer in the 90's and we rarely had a day without at least one "woopsie".
@@watchyourtimeco1 Still the one in a small boat have the same responsibilities as the captain on a large supertanker. And he will be judged by the same laws as the captain of said ship.
There are so many wrong facts in this video. Please at least check what type of ships are involved!
The things the Ocean goes through😢
What about all the oil, Diesel, hydraulic fluid???? The damage is massive & they don’t seem to take responsibility
Larger machine/ship/boat always has right of way!! Common sense!
hey richard head, where's the footage of the boat going over the waterfall?
That life boat would have been a hell of a ride even though they have seat belts in them.
Heck, To me it looks like a great amusement park ride!! OFC, I also used to freeclimb rock faces at night so... ;)
Apparently operating a camera is much more difficult than operating a boat!
I am assuming 6.1 million views is from the trolling picture, but everybody knew that boat wasn't going over the falls, right?
I also agree about the editing done a bit sloppy. There are some good pictures and videos so it's worth the time.
I was most surprised by the five repeats.
coastguard should have known better then getting in the way of the bulk carrier, the carrier probably didn't even notice hitting the coastguard
Comparably it's like an 18 wheeler driving over a pebble.
As soon as I saw you were only going to show us a thin 1/3 slice of video between two sidebars, I went elsewhere. Ohhh, but sooooo stylish!
A 40 ton ship?!!!!! Wow!!!!
Beautiful people in a beautiful country 💖
Whoever gave this video the greenlight and, most specifically, the editor, need a refresher on how to make a video. This, though riveting, was a joke...
Shut up. Who are you, John Huston?
Parents who allow underage children to play on Jet Skis should be arrested. Each recreational lake, river, or whatever needs to make it’s own laws. I’ve boated on lakes and rivers for 65 years and I can tell you that most 13 year olds are too young to make good decisions. That includes me at that age and all my kids who are grown now.
I'm pretty sure that when that 24 mil yacht did damage it was way more than 100,000 in damages
The first three rules of boating. Safety, safety, safety. The two best days of your boating life. The day you buy your boat and the day you sell your boat. Been there done that for 13 years. We had a lot of great memories on our boat. The day I sold it, I was extremely happy.
What I learned about the Bosborus:
Do not place your bed next to the seaside window
I live on a boat. Why am I watching this on my boat? It's 10:19pm here in NZ and I'm not sure I'm going to sleep tonight 😅
Have a large beer!
I was wanting to see the thumbnail video. Only reason I even clicked the video.
These marine accidents are mind boggling. I never knew these things happened.
Did anyone see the boat go over the Falls? I could feel my heart go into my chest visualizing it happening. However, there was no footage to show it actually happening that I could find. Did I miss it? Will l have to rewind this video? Did somebody trick me into watching this video? Even though, I am wondering how any ship could get as far as they did. How easy it was having a disaster. It appeared that many were going too fast and did not seem to know where they were heading. I hope whistles were blown and horns blasted for people to get out quickly before being rammed into or crashed. How many lives were lost in any of these that could have been prevented if proper procedures were followed. What seems to be the problem? There has to be a link somewhere if anyone is looking. Not being there to find out more details, I do know this. For one, they have to have 2-way radio communication for navigation 2. There has to be warning markers in the area, to stay left, right and the speed 3. There is usually a pilot boat directing ships around other ships and dangerous areas 4. There are lookouts around the ship looking for danger. 5. In port leaving and docking. There is normally someone standing by for the lines. How was it possible to have so many people involved, not prevent an incident? Are ships short staffed from Covid-19 or some other reason to have one person; perhaps, do it all.
I didn't see it either! We were both tricked.
Could have been about 30% shorter if you wouldn't repeat the vids
This would've been a great compulation if you hadn't tried to fit 80 clips into a 29+ min video! Way too many glitches with a few repeats of video. It's too bad really, cuz you have a great narrators voice 👍 Sure do hope your other vids, ( this is my first viewing of you're channel ) hold many candles to this one. 🌎 ❤ ✌
*The police were able to use the footage caught on camera to identify the suspect.*
What surprises me the most is that captains on a vessel with a rudder problem seemingly don’t use the engines to prevent the vessel from colliding. Full throttle into a dock or other vessel is not only due to rudder problems.
The two boats were about the same size and power so as I remember the boat on the right has the right of way.
Why did the boat bit by the barge start leaking water???
Amazing how many "faults" develop while bridges are unmanned or manned by inexperienced or drunk navigators. The problem is that such negligence causes huge amounts of pollution and yet no-one goes to gaol.
See 25:16. The captain and a crew member got 7 months in prison.
You could re-edit this - most definitely.
All those cargo containers in the ocean must be adding to sea level rise. 😵💫
Aww, have a heart. Give the script writer his bonus! ❤
With accidents like 4:19, 5:25 & 9:13, makes the ending of Speed 2 a lot less preposterous 😂
The other problem is the photo-shopped totally fake/bogus intro photo.
The one with the guy looking back at the ship was the funniest.
Come on. I want to see the 24" Sea Ray go over the falls.
I said inches, because it never happened.
I said inches, because it never happened.
Jesus loves you 🌸🐡🌷♥️🥀💮🪁🐾🐋🐚🐞🪷🦭💐🌼⚘️🐳🐬
My 10 year old is still awaiting payment for the editing. Your attention would be greatly appreciated
I'm from Halifax. I know about shipping collision accidents.
Ships don’t develop a tilt to the right or left - they list to starboard or port.
I understand it's difficult to drive a boat let alone operate a massive ship but how do you have 20,000 SQ miles to navigate and still manage to hit another ship? Unless the waters are choppy, weather is gnarly and you may or may not have a mechanical failure, then I don't get how that happens.
Everyones prolly sleeping or not watching
I was on a aircraft carrier off Singapore 14 people on the bridge only one. Non-rate saw that we were going to over take them and cut them in half. A 18ft hole in our bow, broad day light 60 mile visibility. Captain fired in less than a week.
The ONLY place that I can see it happening is when maneuvering around docks and they have mechanical issues like no reverse or whatever!!
The rest are just not paying attention or complete DUMBASS'S!!!
@@larrywilliams8849 So in that instance is it not just that the Captain was incompetent?
Well, take your pick...arrogance, incompetence, alcohol, drugs...it's water moron bingo.
Watching these videos is an eye opener, that while we assume boat captains are trained and skilled to operate a boat or ship, that just isn't the case !
In fact, there are captains who have not gone to school and do not have any certification documents, but their laxity still allows them to control the ship at sea or carry passengers.
Hope they have good insurance.
Wow, How does this happen so much without mechanical failure ?
It's called alcohol.
think you need to work on editing
Those cargo ships are so overloaded. It's always about competition and less about practical safety.