The realities of self equalizing anchors

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ค. 2024
  • The first video in what will be a series regarding anchoring. This one is about the realities of self equalization.
    www.roninrescue.com/post/anch...

ความคิดเห็น • 5

  • @JonBrowning760
    @JonBrowning760 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A solution would be helpful

  • @ALRinaldi
    @ALRinaldi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What multipoint anchors would y’all recommend in place of the sliding x?

  • @sp10sn
    @sp10sn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    a lot of words

  • @adventureswithfrodo2721
    @adventureswithfrodo2721 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your biggest fallacy is you comment on how it is to move when it is weighted. But that was never the point. It is the ability to move and track as the climber moves. There a probable a lot of falacies in the climbing world. One being in using limiting knots in dyneemia slings. The knot severely decreases the slings strength.

    • @iacamigevaerd376
      @iacamigevaerd376 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think their point it that the sliding X sells as 50/50 automatic load distribution while it's not exactly the case. However I'm definitely with you, all that fuss and it's just about body weight statically loaded. Nobody cares honestly, it will hold just fine. I personally prefer a quad simply because of the convenience of not getting pulled over when my partners moves