1955 Chevrolet - Boxes & Balls - Original Promo Film

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 มี.ค. 2014
  • See a '55 Chevy crash tested - OUCH! Chassis and suspension report - original promotional film. For more 1955 Chevy info - www.carsandstripes.com/articl...
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 134

  • @richt8297
    @richt8297 6 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    That driver has balls. He could have ended up in a box 😜

  • @benboor7924
    @benboor7924 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I love the advertising of the 50's! The all new 55 Chevy Bel Air, with our new box design chassis and your ballsy driving, there's no place you can't go! Running late for work? Jump the creek and take the railroad tracks! Chevy engineers know how your little Johnny will drive by watching and studying how he plays with his toys. If anything happens to your Chevy, just buff it out with a hammer and you'll be ready to go again!

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 5 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I'm sure glad they anticipated me driving off a ramp into a car

    • @Beatlefan67
      @Beatlefan67 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      me too - it happens all the time in England as well!

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Got to love those four wheel drum brakes

  • @bkucinschi
    @bkucinschi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I'm sold.... tomorrow morning I'll run to the closest Chevrolet dealership and buy the 1955 model... Better built for sure that a 2019 Equinox

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Back when Chevrolet had balls

  • @richdiscoveries
    @richdiscoveries ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Those dirt roads out in the country, so beautiful. Probably all fully developed areas now

  • @margiemouse1660
    @margiemouse1660 9 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    What blows me away with the crash test is there are no seat belts in these cars and the steering columns could kill you in a crash . You can see the driver dive under and to the side of the steering wheel and then come back up. I can't believe the nerve and courage these guys had.

    • @luffy_804
      @luffy_804 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      balls they had balls

    • @davidcampbell1899
      @davidcampbell1899 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There is a crash test Video on u tube by IHS of a 59 chev and a 2010 malabu, watch it! its a shocker

    • @101Volts
      @101Volts 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That 59 had the weak "X Frame," though, so it's not representative of all 1950s-1960s cars.

    • @OldsVistaCruiser
      @OldsVistaCruiser 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Baily DenhHouten - I had a '59 Olds 98 (one of GM's upper-echelon cars) that had NO seat belts at all.

    • @101Volts
      @101Volts 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @bad dog Yep. I've seen 3 other 59s that folded in like the one in the 59 vs 09 video; two hit each other and were in a newspaper clipping.

  • @redradiodog
    @redradiodog 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Gee dad, can we buy a new 1955 Chevrolet? They're neat!

    • @chieftp
      @chieftp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      sure son, that would be swell...as long as you don't pick up any colored hobos.

    • @buckeyejim2989
      @buckeyejim2989 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure son but me and ur mom need room to wrestle. The Nomad with those power options is the car for us. Lol

    • @bobsilver3983
      @bobsilver3983 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well Gee Whiz, that would be really fine!

    • @genehunsinger3981
      @genehunsinger3981 ปีที่แล้ว

      GOLLY Wally,,,,you remember what happened the last time WE didnt talk to your MOTHER before hand.AH,,just kid'n-LETS go buy that BAD BOY!

  • @christofour217
    @christofour217 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you look closely as the car pulls away not even the headlights are broken!!!! Amazing!!!

  • @shananagans5
    @shananagans5 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "Boxes & Balls" At first I thought this was a sex ed film.

  • @scrappy7571
    @scrappy7571 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    What happened in '58, when the "X frame" replaced the box frame? Were those engineers smoking crack?

    • @101Volts
      @101Volts 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's called getting high on money if they were trying to save costs. Y'know, if you cut corners you no longer have a square; do it enough and the circle's rolling.

    • @timpriddy349
      @timpriddy349 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Frontend damage.........forget the OTHER guy in his generic machine.....you gotta box frame

    • @tabbott429
      @tabbott429 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      To which they changed again in 65 because it had no side impact protection whatsoever. I have 58 belair. It's cool but it definitely not safe in a collision. Doors have nothing but sheetmetal no crash bars etc. The marketing hype in these old commercials is comical.

  • @driverslqqk7940
    @driverslqqk7940 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really like this video and all yours this is so spectacular thank you for making it. I enjoyed watching this and leaning because I was an aircraft Engineer. This is good !

  • @stephenpemberton9943
    @stephenpemberton9943 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I see where the Filmmakers of Christine got some good ideas

  • @trackerrrr
    @trackerrrr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm gonna buy a '55 if I ever feel the need to jump and crash into another car's windshield...

  • @mannysview6980
    @mannysview6980 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't think today's million dollar car will be worth buying than 1950s cars

  • @theedchannel9295
    @theedchannel9295 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very entertaining and somewhat educational. I'd like to a car manufacturer do those stunts today. Their legal and insurance departments would have stroke or something!

  • @waltertomaszewski1083
    @waltertomaszewski1083 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Kind of surprising to me GM didn't put collapsible steering columns in their cars until the 1960's, even though they'd known since the 1930's that solid steering columns killed many a driver in a front crash.

    • @LDSRaichu
      @LDSRaichu 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've wondered that myself

    • @101Volts
      @101Volts 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Supposedly they made some other measure in the 50s by moving the placement of a solid column so it wouldn't be so likely to kill a person. That doesn't really help in all instances, though.

    • @chrislemaster2695
      @chrislemaster2695 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The first car to have safety pop out glass seat belts and a crash safety chamber and padded dash was the 1948 Tucker Sedan made my Preston Thomas Tucker.

    • @tabbott429
      @tabbott429 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gm is a company based on cost cutting and profits. They don't care about people. Other car companies are no different especially back then.

    • @johnrroberts7900
      @johnrroberts7900 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The reason it happened was called Ralph Nader's 'Unsafe at Any Speed'

  • @chriswright8464
    @chriswright8464 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My Dad had 55 Belair, green with a cream roof.

  • @mrsgstd
    @mrsgstd 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Chevy sure smashes that Frazer at the end!

    • @The1971orange
      @The1971orange 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wow, good eye. I was trying to figure out what make that was.

  • @borax747
    @borax747 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    they don`t makem to last like that any more, I remember working on my friends 56 these cars were made really strong,I would love to have one now my friend Gary Seeds hand 57 also very nice cars.

    • @RivieraByBuick
      @RivieraByBuick 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      strong? they rusted out in 2 years. Valve job every 20K miles. engine life to compleat overhaul about 80K miles. These fancy balljoints, ok, true innovation, really hard in production, but back then they lasted about 7k miles.

    • @hangglidernerd
      @hangglidernerd 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      mine isn't rusted out....my 55 Chevy and I just had our 30th anniversary together....265 v8 goes 150k between rebuilds... I had to replace the ball joints after the car turned 40...that's forty years.....valve job?...evey rebuild....so 150,000 miles....just horrible! ... get a clue!

    • @animalcorvair
      @animalcorvair 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      i have a 56 dad bought it new ,,they did not rust out in 2 years my 265 went 125,000 miles ..an my ball joints were oem till i went an rebuilt the front end do to age not miles ,,its how you take care of your car an gee i raced it every fri...did have to rebuild the pg tranny twice ,,,lol

    • @RivieraByBuick
      @RivieraByBuick 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah. nice fairy tail

    • @animalcorvair
      @animalcorvair 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      i was 4 when dad bought the belair i know that car inside an out i still have it

  • @modellerdesign
    @modellerdesign 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I get high from that suspension. Try to ride that railways in modern heaps huh....

  • @nikolovell
    @nikolovell 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ok so there's no way that "oRdiNarY cArDbOarD bOx" supported that man

    • @davidlee9026
      @davidlee9026 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe they made cardboard boxes out of better materials back in the 50's much like most other things back then.

    • @user-gk1mp1zk7n
      @user-gk1mp1zk7n 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidlee9026 nope, cardboard has stayed the same

  • @saxongreen78
    @saxongreen78 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Is that an old Frazer they crunched in that gratuitous crash test?

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had a 1964 Biscayne 2 speed automatic 283 2 Barrel

  • @chieftp
    @chieftp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    4:10 how's the driver of the black car doing?

    • @mashikawa1995
      @mashikawa1995 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ded.

    • @101Volts
      @101Volts 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There probably was no driver. I know you were likely saying that in jest.

    • @phoenixrc0074
      @phoenixrc0074 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      not too good

  • @stephenpemberton9943
    @stephenpemberton9943 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Chevrolet lying for 60 years...Enjoy!..buddy i weigh 200lbs and i be damned if a box from then or nows gonna hold me up

  • @americanpatriot3638
    @americanpatriot3638 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:20 BS!! What's that cardboard made of? Concrete? Or is it full of books.....??

    • @Bandit69ply
      @Bandit69ply 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya know! I had the same thought when i saw thought. I said, Oh yeah alright. What? Were boxes made of 4 ply cardboard back then? Whatever. Lol😝

  • @genehunsinger3981
    @genehunsinger3981 ปีที่แล้ว

    BOY they really PUSHED the jumping your new 55 Chevy!!!Wonder how many ppl took that challenge with the mother in law on board?!?!?!

  • @GUMBYVLOG
    @GUMBYVLOG 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:50 something:
    Free rolling balls!?
    Shit, I have free rolling balls too, oh wait, I'm a 1964 model!!

  • @fujifrontier
    @fujifrontier ปีที่แล้ว

    I just want to see how the “Chevrolet box frame” holds up in a crash

  • @jessenester1478
    @jessenester1478 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice vid

  • @76629online
    @76629online 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I kept waiting for Bugs Bunny to make an appearance.

  • @christofour217
    @christofour217 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It also handle plunges off of cliffs - just drive away with minimal sheet metal damage. lmao

  • @elcabezon5487
    @elcabezon5487 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow on the jump,they didn't lose the hubcaps,,,with those flimsy skinny tires it didn't roll on it's side

  • @jrg7951
    @jrg7951 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bigger Better Boxes Bring Beautiful Ball joints Beyond Breaking

  • @fiddlerpin
    @fiddlerpin 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They didn't know about sway bars until 1957

    • @JackF99
      @JackF99 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They were around well before that. Some cars like Buicks and Oldsmobiles had them in the 1930's. I know Chevy had them at least by in the late '40's. The idea was patented decades before that.

  • @ajaye7120
    @ajaye7120 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not thinking out of the box huh lol

  • @101Volts
    @101Volts 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    4:05
    Well, that's one way to make a car that drives away after such a collision. Why haven't I seen things like this in car tests from 2010-2015? Do they not do that? (I don't imagine a Prius would drive away from such a crash.)

    • @gopher101media
      @gopher101media 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Austin Lucas Such a test would be perfect nowadays. Like for example a Ford F-150 launching of such a ramp and landing on a Silverado or Sierra or a Ram (I never buy any Ram) or hell a Titan or Tundra or better yet all five mentioned.

    • @mikeklaene4359
      @mikeklaene4359 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Austin Lucas Newer cars are designed with 'crush zones' to absorb impacts. In this video you can see that the driver leans far to the right to avoid impacting the steering wheel. I suspect that there was some padding to the side, below the camera angle, to provide the stunt driver some protection.

    • @redtra236
      @redtra236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The likelihood of a crash happening where a car launches off a ramp and lands on top of another car is very unlikely so that's probably why such tests aren't common.

  • @samsungtvset3398
    @samsungtvset3398 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would have been more realistic if the two cars collided head on rather than the Chevy landing on the comparatively soft roof of the other car.

  • @scootergeorge9576
    @scootergeorge9576 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:09 Land a 1948 Kaiser on top of a '55 Chevy and see what happens!

  • @56cadd
    @56cadd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Set points at 0.16

  • @rorybellamy2533
    @rorybellamy2533 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the heavier the better ! 1955 ! look at those Drum brakes !

  • @kdmq
    @kdmq 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Title should have been "two balls".

  • @azizlightmcqueen5175
    @azizlightmcqueen5175 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    still drives 😬🙌

  • @aarongranda7825
    @aarongranda7825 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That baby retires this year.
    Maybe that's a Kaiser?

  • @aarongranda7825
    @aarongranda7825 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1950 Mercury?

  • @theunknown1685
    @theunknown1685 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    "50% more rigid"... like if that's a good thing lol. It's kinda funny hearing them bragging about how "undeformable" their car is :P

    • @tabbott429
      @tabbott429 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exactly. More rigid to send shockwaves through the people inside while they fly through the windshield.

  • @Untainted313
    @Untainted313 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    At4:15 what about the other driver just drive away

  • @turbinegraphics16
    @turbinegraphics16 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its interesting how it implies that it has 50/50 weight distribution and how engineering excellence is given a high priority because cars that came after didn't even pretend to care about handling, the new chevys of the 70s seem worse when they should have been better.

    • @21stcenturyozman20
      @21stcenturyozman20 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      *​​turbine graphics 16* - handling? *What* handling? According to former AU motoring journalist and rally driver Evan Green, *the average American motorist wouldn't know handling if he found it in bed with him.​* (That comment was made by Green in response to an American motoring journalist's comparison of a Mustang and an E-type Jag, wherein said journalist claimed the 'Stang handled as well as the Jag. The bloody 'Stang couldn't even corner!)

  • @willpoundstone71
    @willpoundstone71 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Today's cars are designed to crumple upon impact so that they absorb the crash energy rather than sending it through the occupants. The car may have looked fine but I don't think the driver was.

    • @carhead9397
      @carhead9397 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      take it from an old guy who drove those old cars. I would rather be in one of them then the things that pass for cars today.

    • @101Volts
      @101Volts 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My Dad survived hitting a telephone pole in the center of the 84 Caprice we had; some fool was in the passing zone too long going head on towards him. Father was in a 45 zone and hit the pole hard enough for it to snap and fall on top of the car; thankfully, Father put on his seat belt like I told him to.

    • @malachimcclain6982
      @malachimcclain6982 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It keep it's shape and won't total

    • @tabbott429
      @tabbott429 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Modern cars are much safer than old cars. I have a 58 Chevy and its basically all sheet metal with no structural members at all except for the frame. Side impact would kill everybody. It's scary how lacking the car is in strength. I love its style though that's wahy I'm restoring it

  • @EngiNetion
    @EngiNetion 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Box of Cox

  • @69roadr
    @69roadr 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks like the 55 got a blown head gasket after the crash 4:32

    • @101Volts
      @101Volts 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +69roadr Hmm, maybe so. Dunno if it's that or a radiator leak.

    • @bradleyhouse3180
      @bradleyhouse3180 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably burning oil that splashed up from the oil bath filter into the carburetor.

    • @svenjovnas7832
      @svenjovnas7832 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am pretty Shore, its the Cigar from the black Car Driver. Stuck in the Grill

  • @barrypfost2963
    @barrypfost2963 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seat belts are extra

    • @johnrroberts7900
      @johnrroberts7900 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not available in the '55. Everything else is though! www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Chevrolet/1955_Chevrolet/1955_Chevrolet_Accessories/dirindex.html. Ford had the belts in '56. www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Ford/1956%20Ford/1956%20Ford%20Brochure/image14.html

  • @scottenser464
    @scottenser464 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So the car kills everything it hits

  • @T.Berker7286
    @T.Berker7286 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    İşte şimdi soru şu : Haklı akla hizmetle kutu saseden x saseye geçildi?

  • @nachomiranda7209
    @nachomiranda7209 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    holy shit this video/clip is old prob in the 1900s

    • @theluckydawg2498
      @theluckydawg2498 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      -.-

    • @nachomiranda7209
      @nachomiranda7209 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      THE Lucky Dawg DRGS -.- back at you

    • @zaxlorax7605
      @zaxlorax7605 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well, no shit.
      1955 to be more precise.

    • @OldsVistaCruiser
      @OldsVistaCruiser 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      THAT ONE AND ONLY ORIGINAL NO VIDEO CHANNEL - Probably late 1954.

  • @bobmorrison5636
    @bobmorrison5636 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Service Information
    Guestbook
    Donation
    View the Guestbook
    Margaret Marilyn DeAdder
    1942-2021

    Margaret Marilyn DeAdder, professional clipper of coupons, baker of cookies, terror behind the wheel, champion of the underdog, ruthless card player, and self-described Queen Bitch, died on Tuesday, January 19, 2021. Marilyn, the oldest of four siblings, was born Marilyn Joyce in 1942, to parents Hannah and Edgar Joyce, in New Glasgow, NS. She grew up in a modest home, which still stands on the top of a hill where the Westville Rd. forks to the Town of Westville in one direction and the old drive-in in the other. Growing up with very little taught her how to turn a dime into a dollar, a skill at which she’d excel her whole life.
    Marilyn loved all children who weren’t her own and loved her own children relative to how clean-shaven they were. She excelled at giving the finger, taking no sh!t and laughing at jokes, preferably in the shade of blue. She did not excel at suffering fools, hiding her disdain, and putting her car in reverse. A voracious reader, she loved true crime, romance novels and the odd political book. Trained as a hairdresser before she was married, she was always doing somebody's hair in her kitchen, so much so her kitchen smelled of baking and perm solution. Marilyn had a busy life, but no matter what she was doing she always made time to run her kids’ lives as well. Her lifelong hobbies included painting, quilting, baking, gardening, hiking and arson. Marilyn loved tea and toast. The one thing she loved more than tea and toast was reheated tea and toast. She reheated tea by simply turning on the burner often forgetting about it. She burned many a teapot and caused smoke damage countless times, leaving her kids with the impression that fanning the smoke alarm was a step in brewing tea.
    Marilyn liked to volunteer and give back to the community. She was a lifelong volunteer at the Capital Theatre in downtown Moncton, which her sons suspected was her way of seeing all the shows for free. For all of Marilyn’s success in life, her crowning achievement occurred in the mid-to-late eighties, when, left with mounting debt, no job, no car, and no driver’s license, she turned it all around to the point in the early nineties that she had paid down her house, paid cash for all her cars, and got her three boys through university.
    Marilyn is survived by her three ungrateful sons Michael (Gail), Paul and David (Trudy), whose names she never got completely right, and whose jokes she didn’t completely understand. She loved them very much, even though at least one of them would ruin Christmas every year by coming home with facial hair, and never forgot that one disastrous Christmas in which all three sons showed up with beards. Everything she did, she did for her sons.
    Marilyn is survived by her three granddaughters Meaghan (19), Bridget (16) and Madelyn (5). While her sons committed unspeakable crimes against humanity, her granddaughters could do no wrong. While her sons grew up on root vegetables and powdered milk (funneled directly into the bag to hide the fact that it was powdered, fooling nobody), her granddaughters were fed mountains of sugary snacks as far as the eye could see, including her world-famous cookies and cinnamon rolls. Her love for them was unmatched.
    Marilyn is survived by her sisters, Melda and Linda, and her brother, Lloyd, who still owes her $600* (*inside family joke - sorry, Lloyd). Marilyn is also survived by an incredible number of close friends, who cannot be named for fear of missing somebody.
    Marilyn, ever the penny-pincher, decided to leave this world on the day Moncton went into red-alert, her sons believe, to avoid paying for a funeral. But, on the other hand, she always said that she didn’t want a funeral, she wanted an Irish wake. She didn’t want everybody moping around, she wanted a party. Marilyn will get her celebration of life when COVID-19 is over. In lieu of flowers, the family asks that you do something nice for somebody else unexpectedly, and without explanation. We love you, mom, a bushel and a peck. A bushel and a peck and a hug around the neck.
    Her arrangements have been entrusted to Cobb’s Funeral Home and Cremation Center, 330 Whitepine Road, Riverview (869-2007). Online condolences may be expressed at www.cobbsfuneralhome.ca

  • @Paulie1232
    @Paulie1232 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    We need a man like Trump to turn this country around again...

    • @Paulie1232
      @Paulie1232 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Clearly you have angry issues and are in the need for some type of meds. You seem to hate Jews, that's your problem, not TRUMP...

    • @Paulie1232
      @Paulie1232 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My friend, it's called thinning the heard....

    • @71plymouth.
      @71plymouth. 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +biscaynenick That's exactly right.

    • @71plymouth.
      @71plymouth. 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +biscaynenick what year is your Biscayne?

    • @danwetmore9882
      @danwetmore9882 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah, it's working great!

  • @super63strat
    @super63strat 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gonna get a shoe box designed NEW Chevrolet . Lets get some balls , and get a TV show in the 80's .
    a New show called ,
    lets name it , ...
    Dukes of Hazard Need some cut off shorts on some pretty young ladies as well ;;

  • @Allegronaut
    @Allegronaut 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a load of bullshit Chevy was trying to pass off as a safe frame in 1955. They still don't care about crash test ratings, their full sized pickups don't even have a 5 star rating.

  • @matthewq4b
    @matthewq4b 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, in other words, it took till 1955 to do what Ford had been doing for years..

    • @matthewq4b
      @matthewq4b 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@my55chevy43 Someone needs to educate you chev fan boys.

    • @matthewq4b
      @matthewq4b 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@my55chevy43 Aww seems like I hit a sore point. LOL. Looks like someone can't handle the truth..

    • @matthewq4b
      @matthewq4b 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@my55chevy43 And now not just sensitive but butt hurt also. You GM fanboys really are not that bright.

    • @matthewq4b
      @matthewq4b 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@my55chevy43 You asked the question you got the answer. And you didn't like it. Then you whined like a little B about it. The only one looking like a fool here is you. As YOU are the tool that had to comment on it in the first place. Then whined when you got what was obviously going to the be the response.
      Then whined a little B and took your toys home when you could not bait in kind. Kinda proves the point without a doubt that you lot are just not that bright. You must be one of those far left-wing virtue signalling Millenials, as that is their MO to a T