We would like to know your opinion about our pilot episode of our video podcast! Tell us in the comments what exactly you liked or didn’t like: the topic, the host, the guests, the length, the format … or anything else? 🙌
12 years ago I was sitting in a tent on the west coast of the US watching the announcement on a laptop using a soup can antenna to pull a Wi-Fi connection from a half mile away my family still believe I’m crazy after the reaction I had to the news. Still crazy after all these years enjoying this video also. Thanks for the video and the work you do. I’m a week late because my family forbids electronics in camp nowadays😎
How to be clock and the anti clock at the same time : From my limited knowledge; I can say; CERN has studied 40,000 years in past and future simultaneously; that means 20,000BC and 20,000AD simultaneously advancing in reverse proportion to past and future and the fundamental pattern remains the same; that is the pattern of flowers of life; flower of life is the fundamental pattern of creation. Coming to the point; as we advance in to past and future simultaneously with reverse proportion and same pattern; we are very close to perfection as time advances in real time clock wise direction. It is very important to know that as we advance there is always concern of the unknown; which means we have to be very careful as we advance to avoid any probable or possible mishap.
The Higgs boson decays extremely fast so we always look for the decay products. For the initial discovery: Either two photons or two electrons or muons and their antiparticles (e.g. 2 electrons and two positrons). In the meantime with more data we have seen a couple of other decays, too. You can get the same particles from other processes, but then their energies are random. If the particles come from the decay of a Higgs boson then you always get the same total energy (technically: center of mass energy), so these decays stick out of the other processes.
Have you heard of "Spooky Action at distance"? I'm sure you have. There's no such thing as "spooky action at distance" if we consider that other universes, subdimensions or different worlds (whatever they are) that are lack of t and 3ds. As far as I see that at least two more of them are out there beside our physical universe. The relationship of our physical universe and other universes (or worlds) is just like traveling transverse waves. They pass through each other without interacting. Then everything is fine with me. Let's investigate and study them so that in the future the government can taxes on them.
Euclid, Descartes, Newton and Einstein: 0D (indivisible, subatomic, non-natural): not fundamental 1D, 2D, 3D and 4D (divisible, atomic, natural): fundamental Leibniz: 0D (indivisible, subatomic, non-natural): fundamental 1D, 2D, 3D and 4D (divisible, atomic, natural): not fundamental I agree with Leibniz here. Can someone explain to me how stuff that can be divided further is fundamental and stuff that cannot be divided further is not fundamental? In geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions. Kinda seems like Euclid, Descartes, Newton and Einstein sucked at geometry.
50 yrs it took for Higgs? thats so much longer than i taught. i always worry they will break something in the fabric of gravity most likely i dont understand.
I don’t think a think you should be calling this particle Higgs boson… dude saw or discovered the particle first. You naming the particle a Higgs or whatever you are calling it is wrong… the name doesn’t even say anything about the particle.. it’s also plagiarism, the scientists should not have tried to give some dude”Higgs” credit for the particle… this will change
To identify and isolate the Higgs Boson particular is one thing, spectacular indeed. However, who or what can create the particle? Something can never come from nothing.... Science 101. It takes faith.
You cannot identify and isolate Higg Boson (for now), but you can do the same thing to the particles after collisions. Watch CERN's Higg Boson videos. They explain how to produce them.
@@hail_2_u321 Don't bother, he's not actually interested. The "something from nothing"- and "it takes faith"-quips are typical creationist rhetoric; literal quotes even.
Did you guys ever stop to think that the problems created aren't problems at all but a matter of miscalculated total matter? Dark energy? Dark matter? Elusive particles? Please just admit the foundational conclusions of science should be questioned so we can move back into a simplistic and functional understanding of reality like the ancients.
We would like to know your opinion about our pilot episode of our video podcast! Tell us in the comments what exactly you liked or didn’t like: the topic, the host, the guests, the length, the format … or anything else? 🙌
This was wonderful to wake up to.
Thank you for this podcast.
Waiting for "LHC -B" discussions.
❤Cern
Great Podcast, Hope you will continue uploading contents like this in the future...
Another Nobel Prize was for the discovery of W-bosons and Z-bosons, which led to the unification of electro-weak force.
"If you don't look for it, you won't find it." ❤
Loved this!! Can't wait for the next episode
Quite interesting interwiew
Wicked 👍
All the best CERN..😍❤️😊
Great podcast. Thanks!
❤❤❤❤❤
12 years ago I was sitting in a tent on the west coast of the US watching the announcement on a laptop using a soup can antenna to pull a Wi-Fi connection from a half mile away my family still believe I’m crazy after the reaction I had to the news. Still crazy after all these years enjoying this video also. Thanks for the video and the work you do. I’m a week late because my family forbids electronics in camp nowadays😎
Great podcast. I hope to see many more.
such a great podcast for the mass with little knowledge on the particle physics
YEAAAAY
i found this really informative, thanks.
How to be clock and the anti clock at the same time :
From my limited knowledge; I can say; CERN has studied 40,000 years in past and future simultaneously; that means 20,000BC and 20,000AD simultaneously advancing in reverse proportion to past and future and the fundamental pattern remains the same; that is the pattern of flowers of life; flower of life is the fundamental pattern of creation. Coming to the point; as we advance in to past and future simultaneously with reverse proportion and same pattern; we are very close to perfection as time advances in real time clock wise direction. It is very important to know that as we advance there is always concern of the unknown; which means we have to be very careful as we advance to avoid any probable or possible mishap.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
description missing names of participants 😢 seems only host name listed.
Could this Higgs field be responsible for "time" dilation?
What did you see in the detector that told you it's a higgs boson?
The Higgs boson decays extremely fast so we always look for the decay products. For the initial discovery: Either two photons or two electrons or muons and their antiparticles (e.g. 2 electrons and two positrons). In the meantime with more data we have seen a couple of other decays, too.
You can get the same particles from other processes, but then their energies are random. If the particles come from the decay of a Higgs boson then you always get the same total energy (technically: center of mass energy), so these decays stick out of the other processes.
Watch CERN's 3 videos explain about Higgs Boson. Basically they looked at graphs from measuring particles after collisions.
@@whocares2277 Thanks.
@@hail_2_u321 Thanks.
Have you heard of "Spooky Action at distance"? I'm sure you have.
There's no such thing as "spooky action at distance" if we consider that other universes, subdimensions or different worlds (whatever they are) that are lack of t and 3ds. As far as I see that at least two more of them are out there beside our physical universe. The relationship of our physical universe and other universes (or worlds) is just like traveling transverse waves. They pass through each other without interacting. Then everything is fine with me.
Let's investigate and study them so that in the future the government can taxes on them.
Plz bring us back to our original timeline
If it was true that were on a different timeline, they wouldn't have the solution to bring us back.
may be better to break the podcast into shorter topics so that people are easier to follow
Bad idea
Euclid, Descartes, Newton and Einstein:
0D (indivisible, subatomic, non-natural): not fundamental
1D, 2D, 3D and 4D (divisible, atomic, natural): fundamental
Leibniz:
0D (indivisible, subatomic, non-natural): fundamental
1D, 2D, 3D and 4D (divisible, atomic, natural): not fundamental
I agree with Leibniz here. Can someone explain to me how stuff that can be divided further is fundamental and stuff that cannot be divided further is not fundamental?
In geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions.
Kinda seems like Euclid, Descartes, Newton and Einstein sucked at geometry.
50 yrs it took for Higgs? thats so much longer than i taught.
i always worry they will break something in the fabric of gravity most likely i dont understand.
There are naturally occurring collisions with a much higher energy. But they don't happen in a place where we can study them conveniently.
I don’t think a think you should be calling this particle Higgs boson… dude saw or discovered the particle first. You naming the particle a Higgs or whatever you are calling it is wrong… the name doesn’t even say anything about the particle.. it’s also plagiarism, the scientists should not have tried to give some dude”Higgs” credit for the particle… this will change
To identify and isolate the Higgs Boson particular is one thing, spectacular indeed. However, who or what can create the particle? Something can never come from nothing.... Science 101. It takes faith.
The Higgs bosons don't come from nothing, they are produced by colliding protons at high energy.
You cannot identify and isolate Higg Boson (for now), but you can do the same thing to the particles after collisions. Watch CERN's Higg Boson videos. They explain how to produce them.
@@hail_2_u321 Don't bother, he's not actually interested. The "something from nothing"- and "it takes faith"-quips are typical creationist rhetoric; literal quotes even.
Y'all still out of ideas?
😂 Right?
unfortunately true 🥲
Sacrifice someone in the portal room..
The only "portal" there that leads to a terrible "location deep down below" are the toilets linked to the sewer.
“There’s no paradise... For you to escape to.” -guts
Did you guys ever stop to think that the problems created aren't problems at all but a matter of miscalculated total matter?
Dark energy? Dark matter? Elusive particles?
Please just admit the foundational conclusions of science should be questioned so we can move back into a simplistic and functional understanding of reality like the ancients.
The foundational conclusions of science are what make your computer work. The ancients knew f all.
❤❤❤❤❤