I was waiting for this one! Im from Galicia, literally 50km to la Braña, and i was curious about this one, but no surprise to see that he is basicaly WHG. Funny think, i know a guy from a village near La Braña who looks exactly like the recostruction of this individual, ever the blue eyes and a very tanned skin color.
I have a uncle who resembles him in appearance he is from Switzerland, we cary haplogroup I1. If you don’t mind please do Villabruna-man, I know all mesolithic European hunter-gatherers are very homogeneous but maybe he’ll yield slightly different results😅
0:53 - One question that remain unanswered as far as I Know is what is the Y DNA haplogroup of the famous 'Cro Magnon 1' Type Specimen from Dordogne, France?
2:44 La brana sample seems little genetically deviate from other Mesolithic Europeans with WHG profile because starting closest populations distance is little high 0.044-0.08 than it should be 0.01 if it had pure WHG profile and also remarkably scores some little Ocenian/East Asian/South Asian in Gedmatch calculators and Nepali in my heritage and have unusual for WHG C1a2 haplogroup, i think it got some genes from ancient Basal East Eurasian ancestry which entered in Europe in Palaeolithic and than disappeared in Mesolithic but maybe survived partially in this La Brana individual.
Stray Latvian. 02:56 closest modern populations 1. Latvians 2. Lithuanians 3. Estonians . Balts are not Scandinavians, or Germanics, we are our own population pretty different from the West. Along Basques and Sardinians, one of the oldest unchanged populations in Europe.
Decimali, please for next ancient culture video DNA could you do about ancient Baikal hunter gatherer from Early/Middle neolithic sites on choice Shamanka/Fofonovo/Lokomotiv or Late Neolithic/Bronze age Glazkovo 🙏
According to genetic models hunter gatherers had medium to very dark skin color with blue eye OCA2 mutation, Cheddar Man was very dark according to all computational models there is no error there
@@MrA-ir3me Regardless of accuracy Chedder Man and other hunter gatherers were very dark, far from mid-tone, but we have found intermediate-colored western hunter-gatherers mostly in Germany
@@MrA-ir3me Western hunter-gatherers were very diverse, with even modern Europeans displaying very diverse skin tones ranging from very pale to medium to olive tones.
Btw for all the dummies, C1 is not intrusive to Europe and basically ALL early Europeans had C. This WHG got it from some Cro-Magnon aurignac individual.
Basically this tells you where in modern Europe are the highest concentration of genes prevalent during the Mesolithic. Very cool. Bizarre - the Nepal connection. Intriguing.
He was Yamnaya, or later known by Scythian.. The fact that he has majority Baltic, Scandinavian and Finnish genes suggests it.. Also they were the ones who brought the Vedic language to India.. This is why northern people from India have fair skin, lighter hair, and blue eyes but the southern half have darker skin, hair, and eyes.
İts very weird to see a C1 yDNA haplogroup in european induvial. But l saw same yDNA in Anatolian samples in a scientific research perhaps in Lazaridis and others text "the southern arc". İts very important l think. He was a whg western hunter gatherers member , but he has an C haplogroup
Makes sense. Nordic populations have the highest percentages of Pre-Indo-European ancestry. The casual observer may erroneously deduct that this man's ancestry is Nordic, in fact this ancestry used to dominate all of Europe.
The Baltics and the Scandinavians, to be more precise, but the Scandinavians have more of a mixture of Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers SHG, the SHG is not pure WHG, it has an ANE mixture. The Baltics have the highest amount of WHG, more specifically Lithuania.
I did not even watch the video, but I can predict that the DNA would register as completely Northern European. Similar to the Andamanese video, the DNA site uses relatively close modern populations as sources of ancestry for ancient or distinct samples. This shows more proximity than ancestry. Europeans are genetically as close to WHG as they are to southern Middle Easterners and northern Indians. It is just that the only populations that carry WHG admixture are Northern Europeans and most Southern Europeans (some Greeks and Southern Italians lack WHG and are plainly EEF), which makes them the closest to WHG.
@@ArturBaidi At a distance 0,05 in VahaduoG25 while being very closely related is under 0,02. The difference which make them litlle more distant is that Swedes have more Anatolian Farmers contribution compared to Early Corded Ware/Sintashta-Andronovo
Interesting! I've always wonder why some my heritage Spanish dna tests got Scandinavian, Finnish or even Baltic, must be the mitochondrial mesolitic dna Spaniards still have from this people.
Can you tell me please about his dna matches section? How many mat hes by countrie and which country had the most dna matches with him? Did he get a good amount of cM matched with someone and where is that person from? Im talking about myheritage. Thanks
@@lamariposa5919 The Sephardic people of Turkey mixed with the already existed Greek and and Ashkneazi Jewish community in the Balkans so what you are saying is not true.
The ancient Iberians were WHG Western Hunter Gatherers, the ancient Europeans, these were replaced during the Neolithic by two distinct human populations the Anatolians from Western Turkey and the Russian steppe peoples popularly known as Indo-Europeans, the modern Iberians and Southern Europeans are generically more Anatolian and with 20% to 30% Indo-European, then Northern Europeans are 30% to 50% Indo-European. Hunter gatherers only left a significant genetic load in the Baltics and Scandinavia, with Lithuanians having the highest genetic load reaching 30% on average
@robertolang9684 The Basques have a high WHG contribution, similar to the Baltics.The Spanish are the ones that have the most WHG contribution from the Mediterranean
Hey, what would be the best genetic tool to check your WHG percentage? On Gedmatch it shows 72% Hunter gatherer for me, but it doesn't seem accurate. @@eltecnico9541
I think he's actually from Central Asia. Which explains the Nepalese side. The Baltic and Finnish part is what will confuse people. I don't think he migrated south from Scandinavia. But he came from the same area in Central Asia as the Finns.
Were these analyses conducted on whole genomes, not just Y and mtDNA? I was under the impression it was whole genomes. But probably not after all as it’s very rare and expensive? There’s no point on focusing Y and mtDNa haplogroups exclusively if they were done on whole genomes. So which is it? 🤔
Only Japanese and Koreans have a tiny proportion of "Y-DNA C1a1" in East Asia. The people in England, Spain, Ireland, Scotland, Hungary, Poland, Greece, and Ukraine...who have a tiny proportion of Y-DNA C1a2. Those haplogroup have left descendants living at this day where it's the East and West.
From many of these results we can see that the Old Europe was significantly alike what we now call ''Baltic peoples". It's not very nice that the author obscures the result mentioning Scandinavian and Finnish part in the text, but ignoring the biggest - Baltic part.😮
I'm shocked, overall, at how much people moved around and interbred/intermarried in those days. Even showing some connections between New and Old World populations; ei, AmerIndian and Inuit. Although...not in this episode. Still...Nepali?!
Possessed some similar alleles to South Asia and South Asia but this does not imply that they are direct descendants of Nepalis, possibly he interpreted it as Nepal
They didn't interbred or intermarried.. They were all the same people Genetically.. Like cousins basically.. If you look at a Haplogroup map of Europe it's obvious..
Lol, MH came up with a Nepalese trace-result... 😄 - but probably best is the oracle: Sicilian and Athabask... makes one remember the Seafaring Basks and the newer Solutreen-hypothesis, that was en-vogue some 400-50 years ago, and then cast aside... 🤣
Im not sure why people have a hard time comprehending. Black people were the first all over the planet. Black people come in all hues and complexions. Black people populated every country and continent. The Genetic marker for Albinism or Non melanated doesnt show up anywhere.
Even so, not as European as Cheddar Man. He was 99.2% European (0.8% Nepali), Cheddar Man was 100% European! It seems that the more genetically European the Mesolithic European hunter-gatherers were, the darker their skin. 😂
When you know that this person is 7000 years old and a hunter and gatherer it would have taken them years to walk and hunt.I think those times were hard but better because there was no discrimination,no borders and bad history so mixing with other tribes wasn’t a problem and sometimes it was a must to survive. I am sure that there was idiots that fought one another but they still mixed.Knowing how we are mixed and still discriminate with one another and fight over borders and especially over human invented religions is just not logical because we are at the peak of knowledge at the moment about who we are.
I wondered when I saw C1 ydna haplogroup and watched curiously, I was expecting any linkage to austronesians or africans but I saw just Nepal in asia. So, we can say that C2 is very different from their ancestors C1. In my opinion, C2, D, K2 southeast asians are unique ancestors of agglutinative languages and related other languages spoken all around the world having descendant haplogroups C2, C3, C4, D, K2b, M, N, O1, O2, O3, P, P1, Q, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2, S. These are related agglutinative languages: Australian Aborigin, Austronesian, Austroasiatic, Thai-Kadai, Tibeto-Burman, Sinitic Chinese, Koreanic, Japonic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Dene-Yeniseian, Native American, Uralic, Finnic, Hunnic, Turkic, Ugric, Brushaski Hunza, Dravidian, Elamite, Sumerian, Old Anatolian, Phyrigian, Palesgian, North Caucasian, Turkic, Kumuk, Tyrrhenian, Etruscan, Raetic, Vasconic, Basq, Aquitan, Old Saxonian, Old Scottish...
Haplogroup C is associated with the first Eurasians and currently with the Asians. The first Europeans 45,000 years ago had ambiguous DNA between South Asia and Africa, their DNA was typical of the first Eurasians with Haplogroup C, 36,000 years ago Haplogroup I emerged, they began to differentiate themselves from East Asians and Africans, giving rise to the western hunter gatherer genetic profile that existed until 6000 years ago
The DNA test interprets them as Scandinavian and Baltic because they are modern humans with more hunter-gatherer DNA, part of their DNA is interpreted as Asian due to Haplogroup C and early Eurasian genes.
@@eltecnico9541 Read my comment above and my other one which i wrote under video, I’m basically saying same thing as you seems I’m not the only one who got this idea👍
@@barguttobed It is not an idea, it is a fact, I studied in university that the first European Homo Sapiens had ambiguous DNA between South Asia and Africa.
![F.HERO Ft. JSPKK x ลำไย ไหทองคำ x M-PEE - ไม่สนิทบิดหมด (Thai Riders Anthem) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kPJZ0UihBfk/mqdefault.jpg)
I was waiting for this one! Im from Galicia, literally 50km to la Braña, and i was curious about this one, but no surprise to see that he is basicaly WHG. Funny think, i know a guy from a village near La Braña who looks exactly like the recostruction of this individual, ever the blue eyes and a very tanned skin color.
Not preculiar looking and not people take it for arab😂
Ese es Manolo el panadero jaja ,viva galiza
He looks like he could be the brother of my ex girlfriend’s dad. He was Azorean Portuguese lol.
La Braña está en León.
@@tannhauser137 y Lugo esta al lado de Leon xD
Totally shocking results for me this time . Amazing video!!!
Makes sense! Areas with high WHG admixture!
I have a uncle who resembles him in appearance he is from Switzerland, we cary haplogroup I1. If you don’t mind please do Villabruna-man, I know all mesolithic European hunter-gatherers are very homogeneous but maybe he’ll yield slightly different results😅
Looks like my dad tan skin blue eyes but not dark thin hair RIP dad I’ll see you again
Very cool results 👍👌 It seems like pre - EEF genetics closer to modern North Europeans especially Baltic. Regards
No surprises there. He was a WHG and the most WHG ancestry modern populations are exactly the one the algorithm matched him to.
Normally. Also if you take into predict that Baltic people especially Estonians have the highest WHG in Europe it's clear.
mtdna U5b2c1 is now mostly in Germany , England and Ireland
0:53 - One question that remain unanswered as far as I Know is what is the Y DNA haplogroup of the famous 'Cro Magnon 1' Type Specimen from Dordogne, France?
2:44 La brana sample seems little genetically deviate from other Mesolithic Europeans with WHG profile because starting closest populations distance is little high 0.044-0.08 than it should be 0.01 if it had pure WHG profile and also remarkably scores some little Ocenian/East Asian/South Asian in Gedmatch calculators and Nepali in my heritage and have unusual for WHG C1a2 haplogroup, i think it got some genes from ancient Basal East Eurasian ancestry which entered in Europe in Palaeolithic and than disappeared in Mesolithic but maybe survived partially in this La Brana individual.
Please do Caucasus hunter-gatherer
Very interesting genetic makeup of a very ancient Iberian. Shows some admixtures of ehg and southeast Asia and Oceania.
ehg admixture here is minor
Interesting that he has the C1 Y haplogroup, suggests that it was more of an equal blending between Villabruna people and Magdelanian HGs.
Can you do a middle ages Iberian sample?
Bad idea, medieval era they were same as modern Iberians, nothing exclusive
@@barguttobed maybe the moors?
@@mybackHurtzz Moors, yeah why not? I’m agree that could be interesting to see
@robertolang9684 THATS BS no they arent modern iberians are mostly anatolian farmers then indo europeans straight whg is very small in them
@@chakir348Iberians have the highest whg of Southern Europe, La Braña man's people's ancestry still exist in the maternal side
Stray Scandinavian? 🤨
Stray Latvian. 02:56 closest modern populations 1. Latvians 2. Lithuanians 3. Estonians . Balts are not Scandinavians, or Germanics, we are our own population pretty different from the West. Along Basques and Sardinians, one of the oldest unchanged populations in Europe.
Decimali, please for next ancient culture video DNA could you do about ancient Baikal hunter gatherer from Early/Middle neolithic sites on choice Shamanka/Fofonovo/Lokomotiv or Late Neolithic/Bronze age Glazkovo 🙏
this is likely what cheddar man and other western hunter gatherers truly looked like. darker than modern europeans but not as dark as africans lol.
According to genetic models hunter gatherers had medium to very dark skin color with blue eye OCA2 mutation, Cheddar Man was very dark according to all computational models there is no error there
The depiction here is not darker than a modern European at all …he looks like Antonio Conte.
@@MrA-ir3me Regardless of accuracy Chedder Man and other hunter gatherers were very dark, far from mid-tone, but we have found intermediate-colored western hunter-gatherers mostly in Germany
@@MrA-ir3me Western hunter-gatherers were very diverse, with even modern Europeans displaying very diverse skin tones ranging from very pale to medium to olive tones.
I am dark haired, blue eyed Baltic, he looks like he could be my uncle, minus the skintone 😂
Btw for all the dummies, C1 is not intrusive to Europe and basically ALL early Europeans had C. This WHG got it from some Cro-Magnon aurignac individual.
Basically this tells you where in modern Europe are the highest concentration of genes prevalent during the Mesolithic. Very cool. Bizarre - the Nepal connection. Intriguing.
He was Yamnaya, or later known by Scythian.. The fact that he has majority Baltic, Scandinavian and Finnish genes suggests it.. Also they were the ones who brought the Vedic language to India.. This is why northern people from India have fair skin, lighter hair, and blue eyes but the southern half have darker skin, hair, and eyes.
@tomriddle4121, a Mesolithic hunter gatherer has absolutely nothing to do with Yamnaya. That’s utterly ridiculous.
İts very weird to see a C1 yDNA haplogroup in european induvial. But l saw same yDNA in Anatolian samples in a scientific research perhaps in Lazaridis and others text "the southern arc". İts very important l think. He was a whg western hunter gatherers member , but he has an C haplogroup
C1 was the first Y-DNA lineage in Europe. It's exceptionally rare in Europeans, but is still not completely extinct.
Makes sense. Nordic populations have the highest percentages of Pre-Indo-European ancestry. The casual observer may erroneously deduct that this man's ancestry is Nordic, in fact this ancestry used to dominate all of Europe.
The Baltics and the Scandinavians, to be more precise, but the Scandinavians have more of a mixture of Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers SHG, the SHG is not pure WHG, it has an ANE mixture. The Baltics have the highest amount of WHG, more specifically Lithuania.
Wow C1a2
I did not even watch the video, but I can predict that the DNA would register as completely Northern European. Similar to the Andamanese video, the DNA site uses relatively close modern populations as sources of ancestry for ancient or distinct samples. This shows more proximity than ancestry. Europeans are genetically as close to WHG as they are to southern Middle Easterners and northern Indians. It is just that the only populations that carry WHG admixture are Northern Europeans and most Southern Europeans (some Greeks and Southern Italians lack WHG and are plainly EEF), which makes them the closest to WHG.
WHG = Western Hunter Gatherer EEF = Early European Farmers or Anatolian Farmers. Just if anybody is confused.
I don't know nothing about dna but you sound really expert my friend
basque 20% whg
All Europeans have some WHG. some have more than others.
Well, search for Iberian history 😂😂😂
Later (2500 BC) the Yamnaya with R1b lineage arrived and replaced all them (all the patriarchal line).
Crazy that the Northern Europeans got so much Hunter gatherer dna. Even from Iberia
Can you do a Sintashta culture?
He already did Corded Ware and it’s pretty same genetically with Sintashta
@@barguttobedIt makes sense because they are both very close to modern Swedes.
@@ArturBaidi At a distance 0,05 in VahaduoG25 while being very closely related is under 0,02. The difference which make them litlle more distant is that Swedes have more Anatolian Farmers contribution compared to Early Corded Ware/Sintashta-Andronovo
@@ArturBaidi Sintastha weren't pie or iir they were not farmers neither they worshipped fire
@@carshedjet Sintashta = Proto-Zoroastrism = Zarathustra's ancestors
Interesting! I've always wonder why some my heritage Spanish dna tests got Scandinavian, Finnish or even Baltic, must be the mitochondrial mesolitic dna Spaniards still have from this people.
Wassup C1a2 I am C1b1
Can you tell me please about his dna matches section? How many mat hes by countrie and which country had the most dna matches with him? Did he get a good amount of cM matched with someone and where is that person from? Im talking about myheritage. Thanks
The facial reconstruction is similar to Japanese actor Hiroshi Abe
Evidently people traveled around a lot back then.
what does sephardic jewish look like? my ancestors have long lived in north africa after spain because of inquisition.
The sephardics of turkey are the autenthic sephardic ppl because they didnt mix up with north african jews and went directly to the ottoman empire.
@@lamariposa5919 thank you
@@lamariposa5919 The Sephardic people of Turkey mixed with the already existed Greek and and Ashkneazi Jewish community in the Balkans so what you are saying is not true.
I expected high percentage of Iberian but he got totally different region. Ancient Iberians were Asian and East European?
The ancient Iberians were WHG Western Hunter Gatherers, the ancient Europeans, these were replaced during the Neolithic by two distinct human populations the Anatolians from Western Turkey and the Russian steppe peoples popularly known as Indo-Europeans, the modern Iberians and Southern Europeans are generically more Anatolian and with 20% to 30% Indo-European, then Northern Europeans are 30% to 50% Indo-European. Hunter gatherers only left a significant genetic load in the Baltics and Scandinavia, with Lithuanians having the highest genetic load reaching 30% on average
@robertolang9684 The Basques have a high WHG contribution, similar to the Baltics.The Spanish are the ones that have the most WHG contribution from the Mediterranean
Hey, what would be the best genetic tool to check your WHG percentage? On Gedmatch it shows 72% Hunter gatherer for me, but it doesn't seem accurate. @@eltecnico9541
I think he's actually from Central Asia. Which explains the Nepalese side.
The Baltic and Finnish part is what will confuse people. I don't think he migrated south from Scandinavia. But he came from the same area in Central Asia as the Finns.
Were these analyses conducted on whole genomes, not just Y and mtDNA? I was under the impression it was whole genomes. But probably not after all as it’s very rare and expensive? There’s no point on focusing Y and mtDNa haplogroups exclusively if they were done on whole genomes. So which is it? 🤔
Only Japanese and Koreans have a tiny proportion of "Y-DNA C1a1" in East Asia. The people in England, Spain, Ireland, Scotland, Hungary, Poland, Greece, and Ukraine...who have a tiny proportion of Y-DNA C1a2.
Those haplogroup have left descendants living at this day where it's the East and West.
Make man of kinewik or luzia or otis the iceman
Need a narrator
Oh heck...the ladies would like him! Probably did!
If he lived long enough to grow a beard he probably eliminated the competition
Ancestors of peoples of Spain&Portugal except Basques
On the contrary Basques and Southwestern French are the most WHG shifted populations in Western Europe
Basques have among the highest proportions of WHG and lowest EEF and Yamna so you are not right.
The Basques are the ones with the most WHG genetic contributions together with the Baltics, it is theorized that Euskera is a whg language.
@@frant1319 Estonians more percisely.
From many of these results we
can see that the Old Europe was significantly alike what we now call ''Baltic peoples". It's not very nice that the author obscures the result mentioning Scandinavian and Finnish part in the text, but ignoring the biggest - Baltic part.😮
My mother is from Galicia and in her dna test it was significan of Baltic dna.
very very interesting👌👌
pure WHG with Y-DNA C1a2!
I'm shocked, overall, at how much people moved around and interbred/intermarried in those days. Even showing some connections between New and Old World populations; ei, AmerIndian and Inuit. Although...not in this episode. Still...Nepali?!
Possessed some similar alleles to South Asia and South Asia but this does not imply that they are direct descendants of Nepalis, possibly he interpreted it as Nepal
They didn't interbred or intermarried.. They were all the same people Genetically.. Like cousins basically.. If you look at a Haplogroup map of Europe it's obvious..
@@tomriddle4121You are so delusional
C1? east asian haplogrup
C1a in West Eurasian are from Cro Magnon
Tollund Man, Grauballe Man, Huldremose Woman
Typical Iberia. Portuguese or Spanish. Did these tribs cme in from the north of Europe?
Lol, MH came up with a Nepalese trace-result... 😄
- but probably best is the oracle: Sicilian and Athabask... makes one remember the Seafaring Basks and the newer Solutreen-hypothesis, that was en-vogue some 400-50 years ago, and then cast aside... 🤣
Im not sure why people have a hard time comprehending. Black people were the first all over the planet. Black people come in all hues and complexions. Black people populated every country and continent. The Genetic marker for Albinism or Non melanated doesnt show up anywhere.
Shut up, Bantu. Your opinion here is as relevant as the existence of your race
Even so, not as European as Cheddar Man. He was 99.2% European (0.8% Nepali), Cheddar Man was 100% European! It seems that the more genetically European the Mesolithic European hunter-gatherers were, the darker their skin. 😂
When you know that this person is 7000 years old and a hunter and gatherer it would have taken them years to walk and hunt.I think those times were hard but better because there was no discrimination,no borders and bad history so mixing with other tribes wasn’t a problem and sometimes it was a must to survive. I am sure that there was idiots that fought one another but they still mixed.Knowing how we are mixed and still discriminate with one another and fight over borders and especially over human invented religions is just not logical because we are at the peak of knowledge at the moment about who we are.
I wondered when I saw C1 ydna haplogroup and watched curiously, I was expecting any linkage to austronesians or africans but I saw just Nepal in asia. So, we can say that C2 is very different from their ancestors C1.
In my opinion, C2, D, K2 southeast asians are unique ancestors of agglutinative languages and related other languages spoken all around the world having descendant haplogroups C2, C3, C4, D, K2b, M, N, O1, O2, O3, P, P1, Q, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2, S.
These are related agglutinative languages:
Australian Aborigin,
Austronesian,
Austroasiatic,
Thai-Kadai,
Tibeto-Burman,
Sinitic Chinese,
Koreanic, Japonic,
Mongolic, Tungusic,
Dene-Yeniseian,
Native American,
Uralic, Finnic,
Hunnic, Turkic, Ugric,
Brushaski Hunza, Dravidian,
Elamite, Sumerian,
Old Anatolian, Phyrigian, Palesgian,
North Caucasian, Turkic, Kumuk,
Tyrrhenian, Etruscan, Raetic,
Vasconic, Basq, Aquitan,
Old Saxonian, Old Scottish...
Que curioso que tuviera tanta genética del norte de Europa, esta claro que era población recién llegada a la península ibérica
This people are the indigenous inhabitants of Europe, modern iberians inherit 10-20% of their DNA from them
@@luca-jminecraftxx9960 Gracce
Sooo basically not Iberian at all just an immigrant living in Spain
I share dna segments and cMs with La Brana.
cant make sense of the nepali
Haplogroup C is associated with the first Eurasians and currently with the Asians. The first Europeans 45,000 years ago had ambiguous DNA between South Asia and Africa, their DNA was typical of the first Eurasians with Haplogroup C, 36,000 years ago Haplogroup I emerged, they began to differentiate themselves from East Asians and Africans, giving rise to the western hunter gatherer genetic profile that existed until 6000 years ago
It does make sense, actually from a very distant Basal East Eurasian lineage which contributed to Palaeolithic Europeans
The DNA test interprets them as Scandinavian and Baltic because they are modern humans with more hunter-gatherer DNA, part of their DNA is interpreted as Asian due to Haplogroup C and early Eurasian genes.
@@eltecnico9541 Read my comment above and my other one which i wrote under video, I’m basically saying same thing as you seems I’m not the only one who got this idea👍
@@barguttobed It is not an idea, it is a fact, I studied in university that the first European Homo Sapiens had ambiguous DNA between South Asia and Africa.