Why Sabina Shoal matters? Once PRC gets hold of it, it is tantamount to an invasion of the PH. Look, if they are only after the sea, the land is not included, which is mere 55km from Palawan province of the PH
*The international law* is very clear on the South China Sea: - parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries including the Philippines 🇵🇭, - the rest of it is the international water, - no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 or Taiwan🇹🇼.
This is endmerica fake , biased , double standard , hypocrite "international " law in favour to usa , gangster 7 members , it's not real true international law .
china chines is only using the INTERNATIONAL law or other Foreign law if is in favor to them or they can use it, if against them Chinese they say solly no speak English thats the nature of the BEAST ,
Sorry, China 🇨🇳! The Second Thomas Shoal or the Sabina Shoal are *not in dispute.* They are low-tide features within the Philippine's EEZ. Therefore, they belong to the Philippines 🇵🇭. Hague Tribunal already settled these by a ruling in 2016. - Whether China likes it or not, the ruling is *final and legally binding.*
😂😅😂😅 UNCLOS does not work retrospectively @AhmetTekin101 Obviously you did not read the UNCLOS. The UNCLOS can't decide on sovereignty and dose not work retrospectively. The Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese since 1946. The UNCLOS 1982 stated that who ever have sovereignty over the area the surrounding water is their EEZ. Since the Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese the surrounding water is China EEZ. 👍
@@AhmetTekin101 Of course. Did you read the limitation of UNCLOS.? It clearly stated that it can't decide on sovereignty! The 1982 UNCLOS reinforced that whoever has sovereignty over the area the surrounding water is their EEZ. Since the Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese the surrounding water is China EEZ. 👍
@@AhmetTekin101 Obviously you did not read the UNCLOS. The UNCLOS can't decide on sovereignty and dose not work retrospectively. The Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese since 1946. The UNCLOS 1982 stated that who ever have sovereignty over the area the surrounding water is their EEZ. Since the Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese the surrounding water is China EEZ. 👍
In 1975, the secretary of state sent a msg to American embassy in Manila. He concluded that “the MDT commitments do not apply in event of attack on Spratlys”.
As long as the US is pairing up with PH for evil intentions, there will never be peace but if PH is wise enough to get rid of US and not act as their military puppet, then we can see peace just like the times when Duterte was president with no US presence!!! So wise up PH! There are more important issues to attend for your poor,slums, and economy! Filipinos deserve better lives than just fighting in the SCS!
@@angeljingdep911 you can't tell what is aggression n threat with 15 US military bases confronting China n aircraft carriers at SCS! Think! You like someone to put gunmen outside yr house!
@@ThinkTalkListen wtf no, china's gonna build military bases on those islands that they are claiming, if we let them be they can easily point they're cannons and missiles toward PH Duterte is pro-china, ofc we're gonna be at peace with them cuz he's selling of Philippines lands/islands
Philippines,a small nation,is taking a responsible stance vis a vis with China,a behemoth.Between the two it seems the former is acting more like an adult and the latter a spoiled brat. It is the Philippines who is actively seeking peaceful resolution .
Ask the United Nations to send UN Patrol Craft for peacekeeping work to protect the Exclusive Economic Zones of the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia. China is getting unruly and is resorting to take a path to war.
@@boogieman4170china is coward all talk no bite has the biggest military in the world "China" has no balls to declare war on a small country Philippines
Asean is divided in this issue. The other members are not vocal. Anwar has said it will not let the South China Sea be an issue in Malaysia relationship with China.
Aside from Vietnam, Asean does not care about the conflict whatsoever, as not only are they far from the contested area, but the CCP also does not bother them whatsoever, and does not feel the effect of the situation. Understandably, Ph would seek help with it's allies.
Agree 100 % …this is why the CCP just pay the corrupt leaders of Lao and Cambodia to to side with them on on other ASEAN EZZ..Lao and Cambodia had no EZZ in the SOUTH EAsT AsIan SEA… Some day Lao and Cambodia will pay dearly for letting CCP rented their their land for 99 years
Ultimately Pilipins interference of China’s trade route affects 1. In the immediate Southeast Asia, 2. MidEast, 3. Europe, 4. Africa, 4. Australia. Will manufacture-import dependent Europe, oil-export dependent MidEast, SouthEast Asia, tolerate Pilipin interference and harassment of this vital global trade route. For one sure thing, China will not Pilipin’s harassment. Will East Asia (Japan, SKorea and Taiwan) and the Pilipins itself stand to gain from open conflict in the South China Sea. It’s to nobody’s good or gain with Pilipins turning itself into a public nuisance #1. Will the world standby with Pilipins making itself a public irritant. For the moment, the US and its Western allies stand by the Pilipins, but the die is cast, open conflict breaks out in the SCS, in the midst of unresolved ongoing war in Ukr and the MidEast, all hands will turn around to strangle Bobo and the Pilipins.
To those not understanding the international maritime law That the EEZ are only meant for economic operations not sovereignity of islands and reefs and it is common for EEZ overlapping. To keep an island That it needs to be occupied for fifty years by people and That is why there is That stranded warship, But China would likely tow it away before the time limit is reached. US always wanted Philippines to start the proxy war and with a Good pawn Marcos Jr in hand, the war Might happen soon. Sad for the filipino people as they will have to fight until the last men Just like Ukraine.
Sorry to say that Phil, Coast Guard and Phil. Navy are coward ,after CCG ramming the two PCG vessel they left thier mother ship Teresa Magbanua at the Sabina shoal. And proceed to go home. Now thier. Mother ship need SOS, they cant do nothing, they put thier troop in a dangerous situation. By leaving thier mother ship behind, coward
No matter what you do China will reclaimed shabina shoal , only war could give flips a chance to claimed it as theirs but not unless they win the war, if China claim it no one could change it !
Why the Philippians dislike china so much and china is one among Asian countries that can help them the most, the Philippians behave just like they are Europeans
Why they keep calling it south china sea it’s actually West Philippines Sea there fighting for trying to call it south china sea. Let’s get it right West Philippines Sea
@@QuantumBits0 The treaty of Washington 1900 and the treaty concluded with Great Britain in 1930 were to settle the boundary between South Philippines and North Borneo.
@@johntwohy8337 The Treaty of Washington (1900) and the 1930 treaty with Great Britain did not settle any boundary between South Philippines and North Borneo. The Treaty of Washington specifically expanded Philippine territory by incorporating islands and maritime features depicted in the Murillo Velarde map, which were not explicitly included in the Treaty of Paris (1898). This treaty was about ensuring that these islands, many of which lie outside the Treaty of Paris boundaries, were formally recognized as part of the Philippines. The 1930 treaty with Great Britain only clarified jurisdictional boundaries between the Philippines and British North Borneo but did not involve any territorial dispute or boundary settlement. Misrepresenting these treaties to suggest they settled boundaries between South Philippines and North Borneo is a distortion of history. Furthermore, these treaties reinforced the Philippines' sovereignty over its territory, including areas now contested in the West Philippine Sea. The Philippines' claims are grounded in historical evidence and international law, including the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling that invalidated China's "Nine-Dash Line" claims. Any attempt to challenge these claims by twisting the purpose of these treaties is not only misleading but also a clear violation of established historical facts and international rulings.
Not south china sea! what China's claiming is our west Philippines sea its nearby here in Philippines. They are crazy Chinese claiming territory not their own
International law made by US own by US 😂😂😂 , since when any countries follow international law , did US or Philippine follow its own rules or laws . We should call it clown 🤡 laws all BS
Bravo! China finally made some positive move. China finally punished Philippine in front of U. S. egging on. Philippine is an important Chess piece of the U. S. Philippine may learn this lesson and stop harassing China.
1:1 Bismillah . . . ! Kailan nagkaruun ng Philippines sea? Is there a Philippines before 1521 in Allah's SWT TRUTH - Islam by the Quran Alone? Subhanallah! Allahu'akbar!
IN YOUR DREAMS. OPEN YOUR EYES BIGGER SO YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE HOW FAR THE LAND OF PH TERRITORY IS FROM THE LAND OF VRUS AND THIEVES. EARLY 1900 CHINESE MAPS SHOW THAT HAINAN WAS D SOUTHRNMOST PART OF CHINA, NOT WEST PHIL SEA, NOT SOUTH CHINA SEA, NOT EVEN TAIWAN WHILE 17TH CENTURY PH AND EUROPEAN MAPS SHOW THEY'RE PART OF THE PH. GEOGRAPHICALLY, HISTORICALLY& LEGALLY, CHINA D THIEF HASNO BUSINESS IN PH WATERS. CHINA'S TERRITORIAL CLAIMS OF WEST PH SEA ALONG WITH OTHER ASIAN TERRITORIES ARE AS FAKE AS THEIR MAN MADE ISLANDS BUILT IN PH WATERS. CHINA'S CLAIMS ARE AS UNRELIABLE AS THEIR WORLD FAMOUS, POOR QUALITY MADE IN CHINA PRODUCTS.
How the U.S. 4 New EDCA Sites in the Philippines Challenges China’s Influence in the Indo-Pacific?
th-cam.com/video/-ZBdc96-OjI/w-d-xo.html
@@PacificReport US shud send troops to Texas to sort out the boarder issue instead!
Why Sabina Shoal matters? Once PRC gets hold of it, it is tantamount to an invasion of the PH. Look, if they are only after the sea, the land is not included, which is mere 55km from Palawan province of the PH
It is owned by China. Deal with it.
They are protecting it... Philippines is coming over to invade!!
*The international law* is very clear on the South China Sea:
- parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries including the Philippines 🇵🇭,
- the rest of it is the international water,
- no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 or Taiwan🇹🇼.
This is endmerica fake , biased , double standard , hypocrite "international " law in favour to usa , gangster 7 members , it's not real true international law .
The international law had written by your mouth
@@gemgChen U mean Winnie the Pooh?
Philippines - 2 gold, 2 bronze medals. Beats Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, or Vietnam.
Pakistan - 1 gold medal.
India - 0 gold medal.
china chines is only using the INTERNATIONAL law or other Foreign law if is in favor to them or they can use it, if against them Chinese they say solly no speak English thats the nature of the BEAST ,
Sorry, China 🇨🇳! The Second Thomas Shoal or the Sabina Shoal are *not in dispute.*
They are low-tide features within the Philippine's EEZ. Therefore, they belong to the Philippines 🇵🇭.
Hague Tribunal already settled these by a ruling in 2016.
- Whether China likes it or not, the ruling is *final and legally binding.*
😂😅😂😅
UNCLOS does not work retrospectively
@AhmetTekin101
Obviously you did not read the UNCLOS. The UNCLOS can't decide on sovereignty and dose not work retrospectively. The Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese since 1946. The UNCLOS 1982 stated that who ever have sovereignty over the area the surrounding water is their EEZ.
Since the Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese the surrounding water is China EEZ. 👍
@@wionporky9937 Have you read UNCLOS or the Hague ruling?
You shouldn't say *nonsense things* like this while knowing nothing about them.
@@AhmetTekin101
Of course. Did you read the limitation of UNCLOS.?
It clearly stated that it can't decide on sovereignty!
The 1982 UNCLOS reinforced that whoever has sovereignty over the area the surrounding water is their EEZ.
Since the Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese the surrounding water is China EEZ. 👍
@@AhmetTekin101
Obviously you did not read the UNCLOS. The UNCLOS can't decide on sovereignty and dose not work retrospectively. The Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese since 1946. The UNCLOS 1982 stated that who ever have sovereignty over the area the surrounding water is their EEZ.
Since the Sovereignty belongs to the Chinese the surrounding water is China EEZ. 👍
Fumigating in one’s own black smoke.
New subscriber po I am from the philippines 🇵🇭 mabuhay ang pilipino mabuhay ang pilipinas 🇵🇭
The territory very close to the Philippines the pirateswant to steal... the greediness of this country is unexplainable
In 1975, the secretary of state sent a msg to American embassy in Manila. He concluded that “the MDT commitments do not apply in event of attack on Spratlys”.
Good Huors Mabuhay ang Pilipinas Law Law Go God Bless
As long as the US is pairing up with PH for evil intentions, there will never be peace but if PH is wise enough to get rid of US and not act as their military puppet, then we can see peace just like the times when Duterte was president with no US presence!!! So wise up PH! There are more important issues to attend for your poor,slums, and economy! Filipinos deserve better lives than just fighting in the SCS!
Deterrence, Think!
@@angeljingdep911 you can't tell what is aggression n threat with 15 US military bases confronting China n aircraft carriers at SCS! Think! You like someone to put gunmen outside yr house!
🎉NUTS
@@bossnandi that shud be you! and it looks like a big one cos you don't understand!
@@ThinkTalkListen wtf no, china's gonna build military bases on those islands that they are claiming, if we let them be they can easily point they're cannons and missiles toward PH
Duterte is pro-china, ofc we're gonna be at peace with them cuz he's selling of Philippines lands/islands
Philippines,a small nation,is taking a responsible stance vis a vis with China,a behemoth.Between the two it seems the former is acting more like an adult and the latter a spoiled brat.
It is the Philippines who is actively seeking peaceful resolution .
Belching black smoke, bottoms up.
@@lindaho4554 U mean Winnie the Pooh?
Ask the United Nations to send UN Patrol Craft for peacekeeping work to protect the Exclusive Economic Zones of the Philippines, Vietnam and Malaysia. China is getting unruly and is resorting to take a path to war.
Don't drag the rest of the Asean countries into Philippines conflict with China. 😅😂😅
可怜的菲律宾哥布林😢
@@zl66666Winnie the Pooh?😂
@@wionporky9937 Time will tell
War will come to China😂😂😂
Philippines: Courage
China: Shameless
I ram you. You ram me back.
You are 🤡
Ph has courage but no balls to declare war on China inspite of bullying complain!
@@boogieman4170china is coward all talk no bite has the biggest military in the world "China" has no balls to declare war on a small country Philippines
There's no need for a debate which country owns the Sabina Shoal.
Sabina should is not disputed waters!!! The West Philippine Sea belongs to the Philippines!
There’s no such thing as west Philippines sea it’s only in your imagination never appeared in any historical books!
Asean is divided in this issue. The other members are not vocal. Anwar has said it will not let the South China Sea be an issue in Malaysia relationship with China.
Aside from Vietnam, Asean does not care about the conflict whatsoever, as not only are they far from the contested area, but the CCP also does not bother them whatsoever, and does not feel the effect of the situation. Understandably, Ph would seek help with it's allies.
Agree 100 % …this is why the CCP just pay the corrupt leaders of Lao and Cambodia to to side with them on on other ASEAN EZZ..Lao and Cambodia had no EZZ in the SOUTH EAsT AsIan SEA… Some day Lao and Cambodia will pay dearly for letting CCP rented their their land for 99 years
Good pm! Alam ni President Bongbong Marcos Ang sunod sunod at walang humpay na Plano at implementasyun that's the real meaning of win
We are a small peace-loving country, but will not bow to CHINESE HEGEMONIC ATTITUDE
Ultimately Pilipins interference of China’s trade route affects 1. In the immediate Southeast Asia, 2. MidEast, 3. Europe, 4. Africa, 4. Australia. Will manufacture-import dependent Europe, oil-export dependent MidEast, SouthEast Asia, tolerate Pilipin interference and harassment of this vital global trade route. For one sure thing, China will not Pilipin’s harassment. Will East Asia (Japan, SKorea and Taiwan) and the Pilipins itself stand to gain from open conflict in the South China Sea. It’s to nobody’s good or gain with Pilipins turning itself into a public nuisance #1. Will the world standby with Pilipins making itself a public irritant. For the moment, the US and its Western allies stand by the Pilipins, but the die is cast, open conflict breaks out in the SCS, in the midst of unresolved ongoing war in Ukr and the MidEast, all hands will turn around to strangle Bobo and the Pilipins.
To those not understanding the international maritime law That the EEZ are only meant for economic operations not sovereignity of islands and reefs and it is common for EEZ overlapping. To keep an island That it needs to be occupied for fifty years by people and That is why there is That stranded warship, But China would likely tow it away before the time limit is reached. US always wanted Philippines to start the proxy war and with a Good pawn Marcos Jr in hand, the war Might happen soon. Sad for the filipino people as they will have to fight until the last men Just like Ukraine.
Dapat lahat ng coastguard bawat isa Meron hawak ng RPG7 rocket propel grenade launcher Kasi kspag umakyat mga Chinese nska billet proof vest.
What happen to Philippines again?
Why they did not ask for China permission before re-suppling? AS PER AGREEMENT!
U mean Winnie the Pooh?
ask permission from a moron who doesn't understand what is the meaning of respect, agreement!
Sorry to say that Phil, Coast Guard and Phil. Navy are coward ,after CCG ramming the two PCG vessel they left thier mother ship Teresa Magbanua at the Sabina shoal. And proceed to go home. Now thier. Mother ship need SOS, they cant do nothing, they put thier troop in a dangerous situation. By leaving thier mother ship behind, coward
No matter what you do China will reclaimed shabina shoal , only war could give flips a chance to claimed it as theirs but not unless they win the war, if China claim it no one could change it !
Why the Philippians dislike china so much and china is one among Asian countries that can help them the most, the Philippians behave just like they are Europeans
help? past administration tried to cooperate with china but china behaves like an old European colonizers.
china behaving like 1900 japan.
Why they keep calling it south china sea it’s actually West Philippines Sea there fighting for trying to call it south china sea. Let’s get it right West Philippines Sea
When Philippines was ruled by Spain and America, the sea was still called south china sea. Philippines is still streaming
The maritime boundary limits of the Philippines are described in Article 3 of the Treaty of Paris.
the treaty of washington extended that
@@QuantumBits0 The treaty of Washington 1900 and the treaty concluded with Great Britain in 1930 were to settle the boundary between South Philippines and North Borneo.
@@johntwohy8337 The Treaty of Washington (1900) and the 1930 treaty with Great Britain did not settle any boundary between South Philippines and North Borneo. The Treaty of Washington specifically expanded Philippine territory by incorporating islands and maritime features depicted in the Murillo Velarde map, which were not explicitly included in the Treaty of Paris (1898). This treaty was about ensuring that these islands, many of which lie outside the Treaty of Paris boundaries, were formally recognized as part of the Philippines.
The 1930 treaty with Great Britain only clarified jurisdictional boundaries between the Philippines and British North Borneo but did not involve any territorial dispute or boundary settlement. Misrepresenting these treaties to suggest they settled boundaries between South Philippines and North Borneo is a distortion of history. Furthermore, these treaties reinforced the Philippines' sovereignty over its territory, including areas now contested in the West Philippine Sea.
The Philippines' claims are grounded in historical evidence and international law, including the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling that invalidated China's "Nine-Dash Line" claims. Any attempt to challenge these claims by twisting the purpose of these treaties is not only misleading but also a clear violation of established historical facts and international rulings.
@@QuantumBits0 There is no mention of 'Murillo Velarde map' anywhere in the Washington treaty at all.
China must observe the ICJ rule. Act big. Phil shall promise noAm fleet and ground force.
Jointly invest on oil and gas.
Nasa bible yan pahantong na tau sa digmaan maliligtas ang mga mabuti
#USphillipinesJointResupplyMissions
Not south china sea! what China's claiming is our west Philippines sea its nearby here in Philippines. They are crazy Chinese claiming territory not their own
International law made by US own by US 😂😂😂 , since when any countries follow international law , did US or Philippine follow its own rules or laws . We should call it clown 🤡 laws all BS
😂 china law is definitely BS. china's historical claim is BS.
claims based on fishing is definitely BS most BS of BS 😂😂
Duwa😂3❤😂sabona zhoL×2❤ kayo sa sarili nating teritory😂
Why call it South China Sea 😂😂😂… ask 3 years old kids who belong too
Going home China
ZYour grand daddy can do nothing against all they can do is a promised of ironclad commitment that will remained a promise !
❤❤❤
Bravo! China finally made some positive move. China finally punished Philippine in front of U. S. egging on. Philippine is an important Chess piece of the U. S. Philippine may learn this lesson and stop harassing China.
R u Winnie the Pooh soldiers?
open your small eye so that you can see clearly
Cowardly not cautious
1:1 Bismillah . . . ! Kailan nagkaruun ng Philippines sea? Is there a Philippines before 1521 in Allah's SWT TRUTH - Islam by the Quran Alone? Subhanallah! Allahu'akbar!
Duwag
EEZ is not Philippines territory. SCS belongs to china and Taiwan territory since ancient times right up to present times. They have superior right.
Tell that to UNCLOS.. Greediness...😢
IN YOUR DREAMS. OPEN YOUR EYES BIGGER SO YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE HOW FAR THE LAND OF PH TERRITORY IS FROM THE LAND OF VRUS AND THIEVES. EARLY 1900 CHINESE MAPS SHOW THAT HAINAN WAS D SOUTHRNMOST PART OF CHINA, NOT WEST PHIL SEA, NOT SOUTH CHINA SEA, NOT EVEN TAIWAN WHILE 17TH CENTURY PH AND EUROPEAN MAPS SHOW THEY'RE PART OF THE PH. GEOGRAPHICALLY, HISTORICALLY& LEGALLY, CHINA D THIEF HASNO BUSINESS IN PH WATERS.
CHINA'S TERRITORIAL CLAIMS OF WEST PH SEA ALONG WITH OTHER ASIAN TERRITORIES ARE AS FAKE AS THEIR MAN MADE ISLANDS BUILT IN PH WATERS. CHINA'S CLAIMS ARE AS UNRELIABLE AS THEIR WORLD FAMOUS, POOR QUALITY MADE IN CHINA PRODUCTS.
@@daniloderecho9145 go read up what's eez in unclos. Not Philippines territory.
@@LeeSkJohn-sv8wi 2016 arbitral court did not honor your 9 dash line..read that
since ancient times😂😂😂😂 wtf
💪☦️🇵🇭😊
🇵🇭：😢😢😢😢 🇨🇳：😢👈🤣
🇹🇼Vs 🇨🇳