Now that the product page is live we know the antenna is a directional “high gain” 4.9 dBi. Surprising reception behind myself and below the stone front cabinet, albeit not far away. We also know it has the ability to insert lenses. Sorry I wished I had received this information prior to the video
Nice to see HD systems think about an affordable and easy to use entry point set of goggles like this. Would love to see HDZero do the same, but we got the screen (no complaints here about that). Surprised to see head tracking on these, thats pretty cool. Thanks for the review! Cheers!
If anyone complains about the price, analog still exists... However, in this day and age it's insane to me that a 1080p screen with a small VRX and battery in a box costs as much as it does. Bring on OpenIPC etc creating cheaper open source products! Give it a couple of years and hopefully it's more compelling to make the jump to HD.
My wife and I fly mostly DJI, but we love our micros just not crazy about analog… there’s are going to make for a great addition to our toy pile 😂. Wish DJI would make a super lite whoop vtx but I’ll give walksnale a shot
analog is decent for tiny whoops as long as you're not pushing it too far away. I'd love to try HD though just to see the difference. It must be amazing to see the details.
I don't suspect DJI is interested in the tiny whoop market. I would suspect they are mostly interested in the highest image quality they can get in a platform that has GPS and now RID. But who knows, maybe they want to be in the sub 100gram market and have something up their sleeve....dreams :)
@@NickBurnsFPV Remember, EVERYTHING over 250grams has RID. You can build some dynamite 2" quads and 85mm whoops with DJI vVTX's in them. The Naked Vista is only about 12g with a nano camera and that set up BLOWS AWAY ANYTHING from Walksnail and HDZero! Without a doubt. I see HDZero videos of guys flying their whoops and they can't fly any farther than an Analog whoop can! Plus, there's SOOOO MUCH SNOW!!! A person needs to only use their head to innovate and make KILLER 85mm whoops and 2" quads with DJI in them. You can build them with far less weight than what the manufacturers come up with. And the performance is SPECTACULAR! I have used the naked Vista/Link in those quads / whoops and they fly great, with crystal clear image quality - BUT THE BIGGEST BENEFIT is they are nearly bulletproof reliable - Unlike the crap coming out of Walksnail and HDZero which fail so often they should be pulled from the market they are such LEMONS!!! Seriously!!
I think this product is great! Awesome video and I am glad to see Caddx put out a product priced to get more people into digital fpv. I would like to see another version of this where the monitor could seperate and be used for spectating for a little more money.
The other affordable Walksnail box goggles, the Fatshark Recon HD, provide that spectator capability, sort of. They have HDMI out via USB-C, which you can feed into either a portable HDMI monitor or, with a suitable adaptor, a phone. Apparently the Recon HDs are now being discontinued, but it looks like a few places still have stock.
Love the low price, but the headtracking is not helping that. Who thought "We must include headtracking!"? They could have lowered the cost more or used the "headtracking" money towards making it work with analog also.
The 9-DoF IMU they put in this thing to allow head tracking would cost a few dollars at most. I think it's a sensible inclusion when you consider the broader context. Exclusive quad pilots don't care of course, but it will make the goggles more appealing to FPV wing pilots, and it creates an affordable, integrated goggles + head tracking solution that can be used with the camera gimbals that Caddx have also just launched.
Im am so stoked on these i can now fly in HD 😂 its like buying my first flat screen tv🤣 great review nick i was wondering about the screen being too close actually im a little farsighted also.... I am definitely going to look into these👍🏻✌🏼
I was thinkin about gettin some contacts, but u gave me a good idea. I think im gonna look for some monopoly man glasses, of course spectacles, but without the ear part, the kind that just sit on ur nose, that'd prolly work good
Fantastic review, Nick! Thanks!!! 😃 I absolutely agree about the antennas... And I commented earlier that it was a deal-breaker for me... But I don't know, I'm starting to rethink it. Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
These are very fairly priced, although I’m a little intrigued how they’ll sit into the long term product line up. Didn’t Caddx say something about a new system when they launched the Goggles X? Also believe Ian (Mads Tech) didn’t get these, so not sure how long it’ll be until he gets to tear them down.
Thanks for the shoutouts Nick, I massively appreciate it. No CaddX has not sent me these or a number of their recent products to review. I don’t know for sure but it’s likely related to the fact I recently refused to sign an NDA CaddX provided due to it being very wide scope and having massively overbearing conditions. These conditions included, I would be potentially in breach if shared any CaddX IP or secrets, I would be required to defend their IP and company secrets and finally by signing I would be agreeing to pay $100,000 compensation to them if found in breach. This NDA would have massively hampered my ability to make the content I usually make such as the technical deep dives, images on my FPV Wiki and even doing a Teardown would put me in potential breach. As such I refused. I have signed many NDA’s from many companies over the years however this is the first time I have felt this was a “trap” or really put me at risk. I work with many companies as you do on new releases without NDAs without issues and we always keep information shared in confidence as such. I don’t have a problem with an nda however it must be specific, fair and not risk having an impact on my channel and theirs was as far away from that as it could be. As such since then I have stopped receiving CaddX products to review. As stated on my stream I would not run out usually to cover every product as I did not review the Fatshark Avatar budget goggle but this is a little more interesting than that with the head tracking ect and i would have been interested in trying to do something a little different as you have already suggested. Here and now as it stands I will likely not be reviewing CaddX products moving forward, as you know covering after the fact is a real challenge from a TH-cam perspective and while I will be canvassing my audience on what they want me to cover it won’t be everything. The reality is it’s getting harder and harder to be a channel that does what I do. Manufacturer don’t like it, that means the things I have done will become a thing of the past. I really appreciate the shout outs Nick Ian aka Mad.
@@MadRC Well that certainly stinks big time. I think the community appreciates your tear downs and expertise. Sorry I was so over confident you would have a set to tear down. I hope I didn't put you or your channel in a negative light. Its curious you have been apart of so many NDAs. I think in the last five years I have received one and refused and they relented. It seems very short term thinking, you or anyone could buy a set or even borrow a set, tear them down, document and still publish and there is nothing they could do. Maybe its time for a Madstech tear down fund?
There is! it's called Analog. :) Why pay $600 + $100 for antennas + $25 for a battery = $725 for something that is only sharper, but has no other visible benefits over plain ole Analog for all that money! Worst value in all of FPV because you get so little improvements over Analog....it's exactly why it's called Analog2 ! It's just like Analog only sharper. It's a SUCKERS BUY!
I think the goggle L are a good choice for most in fpv, especially at the price. the goggles x have a few more features that some may want, I believe caddxfpv.com has a chart with the differences in features.
@@NickBurnsFPV the only thing that's keeping me from getting the L is the potential for upgrades with the X. With the modularity. But really 1080p 60 is fine for me. I'm just flying for fun
Nice WWF-Plaster, Nick. Was looking for a preused Fatshark Goggles at the moment, cause my EV800D Box Goggles are death after six years, but I think the problem has solved itself. Think I switch to walksnail now.
Hello, love your content❤️. Right now i have a dji mini 2 and i want to get in to FPV so i was looking for rtf kits. But now i don’t know what to get. My budget is 250e and i want to fly indoors, outdoors and also practice on the simulator. I was looking at: tinyhawk 3+, cetus pro or x and Sub250 Whoopfly16. I would be more than thankful if you could help me and recommend me what to get (maybe any other kits). Thank you!!
I think the cetus is more limited in longer term use, I think the tinyhawk 3 is pretty good starter, but the whoopfly16 would be better if the primarily flights are going to be inside.
Looks awesome, just got an analog Meteor85 but might have to switch to the hd version with this coming out. Do you know when the goggles will actually be released (not pre-order)? Thanks, awesome vid!
Thanks foe the review. I would guess (hope) that with a single screen like this the IPD isn'a a factor for those of us who are concerned about it and normally need a google with at least a 70 or greater IPD???
The quality and reliability should be Walksnail's standards: CRAP! ... Released too early with Bugs Galore, features not present or don't work, and a crap load of them dead out of the box! Walksnail deserves NO TRUST from us! 🅾️ Don't be a SUCKER and buy these! ... Wait 6 - 12 months until they fix the assortment of problems they'll have! BE PATIENT AND DON'T GET BURNED! 😢👎🤬
I have to admit these are pretty sick. I have a hard time advising new pilots to buy analog gear but the cost of digital to a noob can be pretty daunting. A Nazgul Eco and these goggles for like $500 is a pretty great setup to start on.
Nice review but I have to say the small linking pinhole is a total dealbreaker for me. The downgrade from a 1.3mm hex to a paper clip is just not acceptable.
I have analog box goggles. I am very near sighted. I do not need to wear glasses inside the goggles and they are crystal clear. So my conclusion from this one piece of evidence is that you don't need glasses with box goggles if you are nearsighted.
I think its safer to be cautious with us and box goggles. I tend to be able to use box goggles from the likes of the "HD" video systems, but not all analog box goggles work for me.
Nice thanks for the video, so newb question. These would work with the mobular 8 walksnail version right? Also I have a radiomaster tx16s mk2. If I bought the elrs ranger micro adapter that would work right with the elrs mobular?
ELRS is compatible across the board if both ends (Rx and Tx) are on the same major version. Major version is the first number in the firmware example 3.0.1 is compatible with 3.1.1. Walksnail is the same way compatible with less sensitivity to the firmware version differences.
Does HDZero have a version of this?! I'm re-he-he-he-heeeeeaaaallllyyy considering the jump from analog with these. Sadly, @NickBurnsFPV, I didn't see your video about these pop up 1st in my feed...But, I haven't watched any of the others. Great video bud!
The fatshark scout HD is about as close as we have seen. I don't believe they are for sale or at least in stock anywhere. And they were more expensive at $279. Maybe HDzero has one in development, but I have no knowledge of that.
Video looks great! But with the latency….eh? But the price is right if you’re unable to afford the more expensive goggles. I’ve been looking at the Fat Sharks but not quite at this time.
The picture looked as sharp and colorful as the goggles X. I personally still fly mostly analog. But I like the performance of the low weight analog micros, my level of enjoyment isn't greatly impacted by image quality. Really have to make those choices ourself, do we want the performance or image quality. For some it might also be a choice of penetration.
@@NickBurnsFPV Thanks for response. I thought colors would be washout like comparing CobraX and any OLED analog goggles. I wish HDzero made same helmet for those who want to test their system and don't want to spend 700 or 800$ just on googles.
the product page says this: It also supports PPM signal output to Radio Controllers via the Goggles L's 3.5mm headphone TX connector, which in turn outputs to the drone.
Hey nick. Any idea on whats a better walksnail experience when comparing something like these new goggles to say getting a walksnail vrx system for my hdzero goggles?.
The hdzero displays are going to be higher resolution and thus more clear and have more "features", but there is some latency added during hdmi processing. I personally believe if we are flying faster or doing something along the lines of freestyle "tricks" we are better served avoiding hdmi inputs, this is something I have to recommend as we don't know from person to person if the added hdmi processing latency will be an issue or not.
Bonjour merci pour cette review, j'ai les recon HD de fatshark, avez vous tester ce recon? y a t il des différences important? ces avatar goggles L sont elles mieux? merci pour votre aide pour savoir si je dois investir dans ces lunettes avatar pour avoir un second masque
Sorry, my reply here is in english I hope that is okay. The goggles L are a step up from the fatshark recons. I have used both. But I am not sure the step up is worth the price. If you have the cost of goggles L to spare and do want to spend that amount then I think you will be happy with a purchase of the goggles L. On the other hand if the cost of goggle L is a budget difficulty then its probably not worth it. I hope this help deciding
Hey Nick, what do you think is the best bnf walksnail tiny whoop for garden and partly indoor flying? I thought mby I could build a meteor65 pro frame with the walksnail 1s vtx. Is that too small? Or should I just get the meteor 75 pro hd from betafpv?
I would go with the 75, the 65pro battery tray is sized for a 300mah battery which doesn't get us as much flight as a standard 65mm analog whoop. 75mm battery tray can take batteries beyond 550 and with the larger prop handles the additional HD weight better.
@NickBurnsFPV thanks a lot🙏, love your channel. It’s getting really challenging for drones now above 250g so I am glad that we have a Mirco guy like you 👍🏻
I got a complaint, these dont work with the share function whatsoever, I bought them to share the experience with my friends but they don't broadcast or connect to a broadcast
FPV and VR are the only activities that make me feel like a disabled person because I need corrective lenses. It seems like none of them except the super expensive ones make allowances for non-perfect vision. So frustrating as a poor person with glasses.
![[TH] 2024 PMGC League | Survival Stage วันที่ 1 | PUBG MOBILE Global Championship](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FVFT-PFwU80/mqdefault.jpg)
Now that the product page is live we know the antenna is a directional “high gain” 4.9 dBi. Surprising reception behind myself and below the stone front cabinet, albeit not far away. We also know it has the ability to insert lenses. Sorry I wished I had received this information prior to the video
Theres X2 patches (tx/rx) and X2 dipoles (rx/rx) inside, so I'm assuming the advertised dBm is an average value.
Hi...is it possible to rewind/fast-forward recorded dvr video on the googles?
@@balajiprasad9046 yes
@@tmc-fpv Thank you👍
@@balajiprasad9046 yes
20:34 I'm glad I watched the video to end just because I got to see that 😂
lol fisheye moment
Nice to see HD systems think about an affordable and easy to use entry point set of goggles like this. Would love to see HDZero do the same, but we got the screen (no complaints here about that). Surprised to see head tracking on these, thats pretty cool. Thanks for the review! Cheers!
Hdzero for emax transporter
I would be all over these if they had a HDMI input. I just can’t imagine getting a set of goggles that won’t work with a sim.
Seems an odd oversight on a product that's seemingly pitched at getting beginners into digital FPV.
If anybody complain about the price, they shouldnt fly FPV.....you cant beat that, the time is right, FPV getting cheaper, Caddx is doing good things.
If anyone complains about the price, analog still exists... However, in this day and age it's insane to me that a 1080p screen with a small VRX and battery in a box costs as much as it does.
Bring on OpenIPC etc creating cheaper open source products!
Give it a couple of years and hopefully it's more compelling to make the jump to HD.
My wife and I fly mostly DJI, but we love our micros just not crazy about analog… there’s are going to make for a great addition to our toy pile 😂. Wish DJI would make a super lite whoop vtx but I’ll give walksnale a shot
analog is decent for tiny whoops as long as you're not pushing it too far away. I'd love to try HD though just to see the difference. It must be amazing to see the details.
I don't suspect DJI is interested in the tiny whoop market. I would suspect they are mostly interested in the highest image quality they can get in a platform that has GPS and now RID. But who knows, maybe they want to be in the sub 100gram market and have something up their sleeve....dreams :)
@@NickBurnsFPV Remember, EVERYTHING over 250grams has RID. You can build some dynamite 2" quads and 85mm whoops with DJI vVTX's in them. The Naked Vista is only about 12g with a nano camera and that set up BLOWS AWAY ANYTHING from Walksnail and HDZero! Without a doubt. I see HDZero videos of guys flying their whoops and they can't fly any farther than an Analog whoop can! Plus, there's SOOOO MUCH SNOW!!!
A person needs to only use their head to innovate and make KILLER 85mm whoops and 2" quads with DJI in them. You can build them with far less weight than what the manufacturers come up with. And the performance is SPECTACULAR! I have used the naked Vista/Link in those quads / whoops and they fly great, with crystal clear image quality - BUT THE BIGGEST BENEFIT is they are nearly bulletproof reliable - Unlike the crap coming out of Walksnail and HDZero which fail so often they should be pulled from the market they are such LEMONS!!! Seriously!!
I think this product is great! Awesome video and I am glad to see Caddx put out a product priced to get more people into digital fpv. I would like to see another version of this where the monitor could seperate and be used for spectating for a little more money.
Yes that and/or a unit that is standalone screen like the HDzero monitor.
Seemed that Albert had some issues with focus on this model so it might not be for everyone.
The other affordable Walksnail box goggles, the Fatshark Recon HD, provide that spectator capability, sort of.
They have HDMI out via USB-C, which you can feed into either a portable HDMI monitor or, with a suitable adaptor, a phone.
Apparently the Recon HDs are now being discontinued, but it looks like a few places still have stock.
Love the low price, but the headtracking is not helping that. Who thought "We must include headtracking!"? They could have lowered the cost more or used the "headtracking" money towards making it work with analog also.
I really don't know why the headtracking was included. Maybe fixed wing pilots like headtracking for the little "pilots" in their planes?
@@NickBurnsFPV Yass
The 9-DoF IMU they put in this thing to allow head tracking would cost a few dollars at most. I think it's a sensible inclusion when you consider the broader context.
Exclusive quad pilots don't care of course, but it will make the goggles more appealing to FPV wing pilots, and it creates an affordable, integrated goggles + head tracking solution that can be used with the camera gimbals that Caddx have also just launched.
Im am so stoked on these i can now fly in HD 😂 its like buying my first flat screen tv🤣 great review nick i was wondering about the screen being too close actually im a little farsighted also.... I am definitely going to look into these👍🏻✌🏼
I was thinkin about gettin some contacts, but u gave me a good idea. I think im gonna look for some monopoly man glasses, of course spectacles, but without the ear part, the kind that just sit on ur nose, that'd prolly work good
That ver well could do the trick
Fantastic review, Nick! Thanks!!! 😃
I absolutely agree about the antennas... And I commented earlier that it was a deal-breaker for me... But I don't know, I'm starting to rethink it.
Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Seemed that Albert had some issues with focus on this model so it might not be for everyone.
@@vanlifefpv6340 Yeah, I guess it depends on your vision. It's going to be easier for some people and more difficult for others.
These are very fairly priced, although I’m a little intrigued how they’ll sit into the long term product line up. Didn’t Caddx say something about a new system when they launched the Goggles X? Also believe Ian (Mads Tech) didn’t get these, so not sure how long it’ll be until he gets to tear them down.
Surprised caddx didn't send him a set. Seems logical for them to send a set to him. Hmmm not sure what to make of that.
I think he said something in a recent live stream about him not getting new releases anymore
@@NickBurnsFPVhe mentioned his viewer base isn't typically aimed towards newcomers. And name dropped you nick!
Thanks for the shoutouts Nick, I massively appreciate it.
No CaddX has not sent me these or a number of their recent products to review.
I don’t know for sure but it’s likely related to the fact I recently refused to sign an NDA CaddX provided due to it being very wide scope and having massively overbearing conditions.
These conditions included, I would be potentially in breach if shared any CaddX IP or secrets, I would be required to defend their IP and company secrets and finally by signing I would be agreeing to pay $100,000 compensation to them if found in breach.
This NDA would have massively hampered my ability to make the content I usually make such as the technical deep dives, images on my FPV Wiki and even doing a Teardown would put me in potential breach.
As such I refused.
I have signed many NDA’s from many companies over the years however this is the first time I have felt this was a “trap” or really put me at risk. I work with many companies as you do on new releases without NDAs without issues and we always keep information shared in confidence as such. I don’t have a problem with an nda however it must be specific, fair and not risk having an impact on my channel and theirs was as far away from that as it could be.
As such since then I have stopped receiving CaddX products to review.
As stated on my stream I would not run out usually to cover every product as I did not review the Fatshark Avatar budget goggle but this is a little more interesting than that with the head tracking ect and i would have been interested in trying to do something a little different as you have already suggested.
Here and now as it stands I will likely not be reviewing CaddX products moving forward, as you know covering after the fact is a real challenge from a TH-cam perspective and while I will be canvassing my audience on what they want me to cover it won’t be everything.
The reality is it’s getting harder and harder to be a channel that does what I do. Manufacturer don’t like it, that means the things I have done will become a thing of the past.
I really appreciate the shout outs Nick
Ian aka Mad.
@@MadRC Well that certainly stinks big time. I think the community appreciates your tear downs and expertise. Sorry I was so over confident you would have a set to tear down. I hope I didn't put you or your channel in a negative light.
Its curious you have been apart of so many NDAs. I think in the last five years I have received one and refused and they relented. It seems very short term thinking, you or anyone could buy a set or even borrow a set, tear them down, document and still publish and there is nothing they could do.
Maybe its time for a Madstech tear down fund?
wish there was cheap HDZero options
There is! it's called Analog. :) Why pay $600 + $100 for antennas + $25 for a battery = $725 for something that is only sharper, but has no other visible benefits over plain ole Analog for all that money!
Worst value in all of FPV because you get so little improvements over Analog....it's exactly why it's called Analog2 ! It's just like Analog only sharper. It's a SUCKERS BUY!
The transporter goggles from the tinyhawk are a cheap hdzero option
I think im gonna make the jump back into the hobby. ive been missing it alot. tryin to decide between these or the goggles x
I think the goggle L are a good choice for most in fpv, especially at the price. the goggles x have a few more features that some may want, I believe caddxfpv.com has a chart with the differences in features.
@@NickBurnsFPV the only thing that's keeping me from getting the L is the potential for upgrades with the X. With the modularity. But really 1080p 60 is fine for me. I'm just flying for fun
There are 2 patches and 2 omnis antennas inside.
product page states two directional antenna at 4.9dBi
@@NickBurnsFPV I think this is an average value.
Nice WWF-Plaster, Nick.
Was looking for a preused Fatshark Goggles at the moment, cause my EV800D Box Goggles are death after six years, but I think the problem has solved itself.
Think I switch to walksnail now.
Is plaster another word for band aid? Sorry, not familiar with the term outside of construction
@@NickBurnsFPV At you, "Gypsum/" means plaster, or?
And yeah. In england band aid is plaster and here in germany it´s Pflaster.
@@psikodelriot6754 ah I see...And I learned something today 👌
Great in depth review as always, thanks for sharing 🤙
Their nomenclature started following skyzone, x for its flagship, L for the lower or less or....
Hello,
love your content❤️. Right now i have a dji mini 2 and i want to get in to FPV so i was looking for rtf kits. But now i don’t know what to get. My budget is 250e and i want to fly indoors, outdoors and also practice on the simulator. I was looking at: tinyhawk 3+, cetus pro or x and Sub250 Whoopfly16.
I would be more than thankful if you could help me and recommend me what to get (maybe any other kits).
Thank you!!
I think the cetus is more limited in longer term use, I think the tinyhawk 3 is pretty good starter, but the whoopfly16 would be better if the primarily flights are going to be inside.
Looks awesome, just got an analog Meteor85 but might have to switch to the hd version with this coming out. Do you know when the goggles will actually be released (not pre-order)? Thanks, awesome vid!
I don't know when they will be shipping rather than preorder. I would expect betafpv representative do or at least have an estimate.
Thanks foe the review. I would guess (hope) that with a single screen like this the IPD isn'a a factor for those of us who are concerned about it and normally need a google with at least a 70 or greater IPD???
Will these work as “Ride Along” with the X goggle?
Yes.
4km factory is pretty good for me as a beginner on fixed wing.
I like how they didn’t make it super bulky like other box goggles. Hopefully they can make some budget dual lens goggles
The quality and reliability should be Walksnail's standards: CRAP! ...
Released too early with Bugs Galore, features not present or don't work, and a crap load of them dead out of the box!
Walksnail deserves NO TRUST from us! 🅾️
Don't be a SUCKER and buy these! ... Wait 6 - 12 months until they fix the assortment of problems they'll have!
BE PATIENT AND DON'T GET BURNED! 😢👎🤬
Feels like putting a lunch box on my face.
Odd spot for SD card if you happen to sweat. Like most might on a hot day.
Maybe they should include a pin to push the linking button, just like the pin that is included in mobile phones to eject the sim tray.
seems reasonable
I have to admit these are pretty sick. I have a hard time advising new pilots to buy analog gear but the cost of digital to a noob can be pretty daunting. A Nazgul Eco and these goggles for like $500 is a pretty great setup to start on.
Toss in the pocket radio
Nice review but I have to say the small linking pinhole is a total dealbreaker for me. The downgrade from a 1.3mm hex to a paper clip is just not acceptable.
lol
Nice show and tell.
Thanks nick👍🏽
I have analog box goggles. I am very near sighted. I do not need to wear glasses inside the goggles and they are crystal clear. So my conclusion from this one piece of evidence is that you don't need glasses with box goggles if you are nearsighted.
I think its safer to be cautious with us and box goggles. I tend to be able to use box goggles from the likes of the "HD" video systems, but not all analog box goggles work for me.
They also show on the product page lenses or glasses inserts for several different vision corrections.
Seemed that Albert had some issues with focus on this model so it might not be for everyone.
Looks like a better option than the EMax HD goggles.
HDMI-in instead of headtracking😢
Nice thanks for the video, so newb question. These would work with the mobular 8 walksnail version right? Also I have a radiomaster tx16s mk2. If I bought the elrs ranger micro adapter that would work right with the elrs mobular?
ELRS is compatible across the board if both ends (Rx and Tx) are on the same major version. Major version is the first number in the firmware example 3.0.1 is compatible with 3.1.1. Walksnail is the same way compatible with less sensitivity to the firmware version differences.
Great review, like always 👍🏽 ❤
Gangster shirt and a wonder woman band aid! 😁
lol. Ya never know what pops up on video eh?
Does HDZero have a version of this?! I'm re-he-he-he-heeeeeaaaallllyyy considering the jump from analog with these. Sadly, @NickBurnsFPV, I didn't see your video about these pop up 1st in my feed...But, I haven't watched any of the others. Great video bud!
The fatshark scout HD is about as close as we have seen. I don't believe they are for sale or at least in stock anywhere. And they were more expensive at $279. Maybe HDzero has one in development, but I have no knowledge of that.
The tinyhawk 3+ hd kit got hdzero googles
Emax Transporter HD are HDZero box goggles that also break down to a stand alone screen.
@@richardjohnson2331 just like the EZ Pilot Pro's but HDZero instead of analog then
Loving the WW band aid. 😊
Video looks great! But with the latency….eh? But the price is right if you’re unable to afford the more expensive goggles. I’ve been looking at the Fat Sharks but not quite at this time.
the latency I referenced was on the vrx product connected via hdmi to a set of analog goggles. I may not have made that apparent enough
Nick how was the picture compering to OLED screens?
What would you choose oled analog goggles and good alalog cam or avatar system with this helmet?
The picture looked as sharp and colorful as the goggles X. I personally still fly mostly analog. But I like the performance of the low weight analog micros, my level of enjoyment isn't greatly impacted by image quality. Really have to make those choices ourself, do we want the performance or image quality. For some it might also be a choice of penetration.
@@NickBurnsFPV Thanks for response.
I thought colors would be washout like comparing CobraX and any OLED analog goggles.
I wish HDzero made same helmet for those who want to test their system and don't want to spend 700 or 800$ just on googles.
what if to try to plug analog video to the 3.5mm jack? i asks because on the pcb, 3.5mm is called CVBS, that means - analog video
the product page says this: It also supports PPM signal output to Radio Controllers via the Goggles L's 3.5mm headphone TX connector, which in turn outputs to the drone.
@ i explain it, but maybe goggles l can play analog video via 3.5mm. it needs to be checked, but i have not goggles l
Hey nick. Any idea on whats a better walksnail experience when comparing something like these new goggles to say getting a walksnail vrx system for my hdzero goggles?.
The hdzero displays are going to be higher resolution and thus more clear and have more "features", but there is some latency added during hdmi processing. I personally believe if we are flying faster or doing something along the lines of freestyle "tricks" we are better served avoiding hdmi inputs, this is something I have to recommend as we don't know from person to person if the added hdmi processing latency will be an issue or not.
@@NickBurnsFPV thank you. Thats a tough one. I guess for 199.99 it's easier to make a deciision
Mads is going to be upset the light doesn't Larson scan lol
at least with the latest firmware its just white and on/off. That could always change
@@NickBurnsFPV very true had to make the joke because mads said something about it on his stream lol
Do you think these would work well for a spectator set of goggles?
they should work well for that. I did not test that function though
Mine came with a soft bag case
Are these pretty easy to link with a DJI Mini 3 ( non pro version; just getting started in flying)
These aren't compatible with the DJI video system
@@NickBurnsFPV dang. Thanks for the response though!!
Bonjour merci pour cette review, j'ai les recon HD de fatshark, avez vous tester ce recon? y a t il des différences important? ces avatar goggles L sont elles mieux? merci pour votre aide pour savoir si je dois investir dans ces lunettes avatar pour avoir un second masque
Sorry, my reply here is in english I hope that is okay. The goggles L are a step up from the fatshark recons. I have used both. But I am not sure the step up is worth the price. If you have the cost of goggles L to spare and do want to spend that amount then I think you will be happy with a purchase of the goggles L. On the other hand if the cost of goggle L is a budget difficulty then its probably not worth it. I hope this help deciding
Dang I literally bought the fatshark recon hd like 10 days ago for $250
Hey Nick, what do you think is the best bnf walksnail tiny whoop for garden and partly indoor flying? I thought mby I could build a meteor65 pro frame with the walksnail 1s vtx. Is that too small? Or should I just get the meteor 75 pro hd from betafpv?
I would go with the 75, the 65pro battery tray is sized for a 300mah battery which doesn't get us as much flight as a standard 65mm analog whoop. 75mm battery tray can take batteries beyond 550 and with the larger prop handles the additional HD weight better.
@NickBurnsFPV thanks a lot🙏, love your channel. It’s getting really challenging for drones now above 250g so I am glad that we have a Mirco guy like you 👍🏻
Great video thank you.
I got a complaint, these dont work with the share function whatsoever, I bought them to share the experience with my friends but they don't broadcast or connect to a broadcast
4:12 Is it possible to wear glasses in the goggles? How big could they be to fit inside?
They would have to be super super small. I don't have a measurement. Maybe on the product page.
@@NickBurnsFPV Thanx for fast answer! You don't have the goggles anymore to measure it?
FPV and VR are the only activities that make me feel like a disabled person because I need corrective lenses. It seems like none of them except the super expensive ones make allowances for non-perfect vision. So frustrating as a poor person with glasses.
I believe the word you were looking for is optometrist 😊
lol, indeed
These might be a reason to revisit whoops.
I can’t manage to bind them to my drone
Make sure both the vtx and the goggle are on the same firmware versions.
@@NickBurnsFPV yep that worked
Will these work with the mobula6 HD?
No, the mobula 6 hd is the hdzero video system
@@NickBurnsFPV thanks, do you know of a good tinywhoop for the Avatar L?
@@user-bh9yk2wv4w Please see my response on your mobula6 hd comment.
we don't care filing we care range test and how works
Regulations don't allow for beyond visual line of sight.
@@NickBurnsFPV So no one should test it? Go somewhere in the mountains or fly 5-10 minutes away from the city, I don't think anyone will do anything
head tracking with a patch hmmmmm
Ian mentioned like 5 times or more, hmm.
Oh come on now. I only count three. Is it double up Monday 😁
$400 aud not cheap in my book