8. Multielectron atoms and electron configurations

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @kevinluo3428
    @kevinluo3428 12 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    after watching this lecture i actually realize how crapy my uni is compare to mit, thank you 'mit' thank you for uploading this video, you have indeed shown a great deal of excellent world class quality education, for many many ignorant people like me that didnt even have a chance

  • @solapowsj25
    @solapowsj25 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    H, He, Li, Be, and B are important wrt studies in fusion power generation, as in the ITER research unit. This lecture tells one clearly on filling electron portal orbital for elements.
    Thank you.

  • @matejogorevc5781
    @matejogorevc5781 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Around 25:45. Why is it necessary for Zeff to be between 1 and 2? Couldn’t electron that is closer to the nucleus repel the other one and not only shield the positive attraction?

    • @matejogorevc5781
      @matejogorevc5781 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Dirk Knight A (what I assume) very good answer although it is completely above my understanding of the topic. Nonetheless, thank you a lot!

  • @doleyakash
    @doleyakash 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OCW 5.111 lectures are very good and everything is explained in details . Thanks a lot.
    Could you guys please upload the problem sets for 5.111 on the OCW webpage ? It would be very helpful and I don't want to go through a no. of books for problems. Thanks again

  • @czdaniel1
    @czdaniel1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am watching 3 different chemistry professors (Yale, MIT, Georgetown) teach the same material, and comparing/taking_notes. The story behind this lecture: Clementi & Raimondi were at IBM c.1960. They had access to IBM supercomputers to work out multi-electron functions, but they developed this Z-value modifier method for chemist who could not expect to ever have access to IBM's hardware vault. Basically, they just tweaked the value of Z for every orbital configuration until the outputs most closely matched what their computers said. You can google their names to get their values tables. Source: th-cam.com/video/WEg0HGo5tUA/w-d-xo.html

    • @suspicioushat4021
      @suspicioushat4021 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting thanks for sharing this 4 years ago! hahaha

  • @yanyuchen9483
    @yanyuchen9483 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a question about the effective charge. At 25:09, the calculated Zeff is 1.34, however, on Wiki or other textbooks, the Zeff is around 1.65 according to Slater's rule (but they didn't show how it's measured). Why they are different?

  • @geomichael1
    @geomichael1 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    mit teacher are so awsome i got a asian teacher in my uni who really cant speak english
    very broken english

  • @TheMacUpdater
    @TheMacUpdater 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep in mind that this is their first time learning the subject material. I feel the same, but I understand that they are learning it for the first time.

  • @Avicenna10
    @Avicenna10 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What an amazing lecturer. If I had had teachers like this in college I would’ve been a scientist. Oh well, maybe in my next life…

  • @addis11100
    @addis11100 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    only 37,000 views?

  • @OhadAsor
    @OhadAsor 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why subtitles? she has such a perfect speech

    • @meowmix6401
      @meowmix6401 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      deaf people, berkleys stuff got taken down because not all of it was available for deaf people

  • @nottobigdudeguy
    @nottobigdudeguy 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    @qiqi9057033 Each d orbital can hold 2 electrons:
    5*2=10
    1:35

  • @BigBearKoala
    @BigBearKoala 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @brickfacade
    same here

  • @adilaitbaev5456
    @adilaitbaev5456 ปีที่แล้ว

    37:33

  • @gunesyagzisk6885
    @gunesyagzisk6885 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    33.31

  • @brickfacade
    @brickfacade 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @pghaffari lol, I'm watching this b/c of UCLA chemistry. Agreed

  • @ericscerri
    @ericscerri 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The final point concerning formation of positive ions is also ad hoc, not to say plain incorrect. www.ericscerri.com Please see blogs on these issues on this website
    The order in terms of energy IS the same as the order in which it fills contrary to what is stated in the video.
    See E. Scerri, Education in Chemistry, November, 2013, p.24-26.

  • @ericscerri
    @ericscerri 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice presentation. However, 4s is not lower than 3d for Sc and successive atoms. The 4s does not fill first in any of the first transition atoms. Please see "A Tale of Seven Elements" or article in Education in Chemistry, November, 2013. www.ericscerri.com