I got a new L home and 2 L remotes. It worked for 5 days then the remotes quit sending. Shut them down and started them back up and they Say good signal strength but are not showing linked to my home cell on the app
I've had the Cuddeback Cuddelink cameras for 5 yrs now. Absolutely love the idea, but the cameras are junk. Horrible picture quality, 2 of the 4 remote cameras allow water onto the battery compartment ( yes, I double checked the proper latching, it the way it should be) . Just last night I watched 4 does and a nice buck walking back and forth in front of 2 of the cameras 400 yards in front of my house. This morning, no pics were taken. I'm THOROUGHLY disappointed in the quality and functionality of Cuddeback, especially after paying SOO much for them. I have a 10 yr old $70 Bushnell that take 100% clearer pictures and catches even the slightest movement. The Cuddeback I have to wave my arms like a mad man just to have it take a test picture.... I'll be glad when their patent runs out and a quality camera company can make a linking system also.
@@whitetailhunter7202 I got my problem fixed and they have been flawless for last few months in the mountain. The picture quality might not be as good as other cameras but this system is the only thing that will work for me other then running an SD camera. I have the cell home in the only place I can get signal and have 18 remotes linked to it. Absolutely awesome system . Other wise I would be walking a 5 to 6 mile loop to check sd cameras in rugged terrain. For my situation this is the most effective system I can get. Working flawless.
I got a new L home and 2 L remotes. It worked for 5 days then the remotes quit sending. Shut them down and started them back up and they Say good signal strength but are not showing linked to my home cell on the app
Are they all on the same channel? Are the location IDs unique? Home camera should be LOC ID 1, Remote LOC ID 2, Remote LOC ID 3.
@@internalflameoutdoors yes. They worked for 5 days
I've had the Cuddeback Cuddelink cameras for 5 yrs now. Absolutely love the idea, but the cameras are junk. Horrible picture quality, 2 of the 4 remote cameras allow water onto the battery compartment ( yes, I double checked the proper latching, it the way it should be) . Just last night I watched 4 does and a nice buck walking back and forth in front of 2 of the cameras 400 yards in front of my house. This morning, no pics were taken. I'm THOROUGHLY disappointed in the quality and functionality of Cuddeback, especially after paying SOO much for them. I have a 10 yr old $70 Bushnell that take 100% clearer pictures and catches even the slightest movement. The Cuddeback I have to wave my arms like a mad man just to have it take a test picture.... I'll be glad when their patent runs out and a quality camera company can make a linking system also.
@@whitetailhunter7202 I got my problem fixed and they have been flawless for last few months in the mountain. The picture quality might not be as good as other cameras but this system is the only thing that will work for me other then running an SD camera. I have the cell home in the only place I can get signal and have 18 remotes linked to it. Absolutely awesome system . Other wise I would be walking a 5 to 6 mile loop to check sd cameras in rugged terrain. For my situation this is the most effective system I can get. Working flawless.