The $1.3 Million Watch

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ส.ค. 2024
  • Innovative watchmaker Greubel Forsey produces a double-tourbillon stunner in a crystal case.
    Subscribe to the WSJ channel here:
    bit.ly/14Q81Xy
    More from the Wall Street Journal:
    Visit WSJ.com: www.wsj.com
    Follow WSJ on Facebook: / wsjvideo
    Follow WSJ on Google+: plus.google.co...
    Follow WSJ on Twitter: / wsjvideo
    Follow WSJ on Instagram: / wsj
    Follow WSJ on Pinterest: / wsj
    Don’t miss a WSJ video, subscribe here: bit.ly/14Q81Xy
    More from the Wall Street Journal:
    Visit WSJ.com: www.wsj.com
    Visit the WSJ Video Center: wsj.com/video
    On Facebook: / videos
    On Twitter: / wsj
    On Snapchat: on.wsj.com/2ra...

ความคิดเห็น • 54

  • @lelov1392
    @lelov1392 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nah! With 1.3 million, I’d buy a 800k house, a GT3 Porsche, and A Lange & Sohne Timezone to go with the suits, and a Rolex DSSD for daily wear and I would still have some spare change left to have some good time with the ladies!

  • @ravenrecords834
    @ravenrecords834 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Meanwhile, Tag Heuer is selling a tourbillon for $13k, and Zenith is selling a GYRO tourbillon for $100k and a DOUBLE tourbillon for $113K.

  • @bobbod2932
    @bobbod2932 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The pricing of this watch is pretty justifiable compared to watches like Rolex, Hublot, and most big brand watches. Greubel Forsey has 100 employees just to produce 100 watches annually, so to sustain they need to set a very high price tag. Accordingly, the finishing is exceptionally good and it surpasses most brands in terms of quality.

  •  8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Chinese make copy of this ,and price will be around $80 US

    • @crobulari2328
      @crobulari2328 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not quite !!.

    • @stevehamlett1183
      @stevehamlett1183 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Give me a R W Smith watch any day, you want to look at the dial and immediately tell the time especially after spending over£1,000,000

  • @TitoBobbyPh
    @TitoBobbyPh 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh, I thought they made this watch with raw materials only found in Mars...

  • @7s29
    @7s29 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whilst the piece is complicated, and I understand what has gone into making such a piece. I just couldn't justify the cost, as it won't make me any more happier than a watch that is way cheaper.

    • @EpiCx8
      @EpiCx8 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      7s29 i guess thats your opinion man

    • @SaschaEderer
      @SaschaEderer 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      No watch would make me happier than a Greubel Forsey Double Balancier though. Although, maybe not. Because I wouldn't be able to wear it everyday... an H. Mosier & Cie Small Seconds maybe? That one's also borderline too expensive to wear everyday... so maybe a Zenith Ultra Thin Elite is the one that'd make me the happiest.... na I guess it's the H. Mosier & Cie. Nothings more beautiful than the Greubel Forsey Double Balancier though.

    • @GODOFLIQUOR
      @GODOFLIQUOR ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@SaschaEdererToo expensive to wear every day? If I’m spending a million on a watch ima wear it 24/7 💀

  • @anxietylove6333
    @anxietylove6333 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    what a wasted of money if buy this

    • @Gumden
      @Gumden 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Adam Herbst And you are no better....

    • @adamherbst5258
      @adamherbst5258 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're*

    • @sensorieskin7367
      @sensorieskin7367 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      *your

    • @adamherbst5258
      @adamherbst5258 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its you're, 'you' and 'are' are being combined.

    • @sensorieskin7367
      @sensorieskin7367 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ''Holy fucking shit, you're english is fucking terrible.'' = You are english is fucking terrible?........... Its ''your''....

  • @malcolmmacrae3276
    @malcolmmacrae3276 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The more complicated a watch the more that can go wrong with it. I'll stick with Seiko, nice watch, nice price.

    • @elliottatwell1155
      @elliottatwell1155 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Complications and precision in a purely mechanical machine is why we buy mechanical watches in the first place and not quartz; you don't buy a mechanical watch just to tell the time.

  • @justicewarrior9187
    @justicewarrior9187 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Costs 100k to make..
    Sell to some idiot for 1.3 million!!

  • @DyingBreed8
    @DyingBreed8 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    if the thing doesn't make me money then I'm not interested with that price tag. lol

    • @ZurriyetBlogs
      @ZurriyetBlogs 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      go gana and digging field for GOLD

    • @bobbod2932
      @bobbod2932 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But you are trying to make the money to live a luxury lifestyle

    • @DyingBreed8
      @DyingBreed8 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bobbod2932 😆 yeah, whoever buys that will be broke someday

    • @bobbod2932
      @bobbod2932 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DyingBreed8 Whoever buys this watch must be seriously loaded. For some people a million dollar is nothing

  • @TheHarshTag
    @TheHarshTag 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why the fuck would anybody get this? It doesn't even clearly tell you the time.

    • @CaptTerrific
      @CaptTerrific 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I imagine because it's a demonstration of the pinnacle of mechanical design and build virtuosity - and of course as a way to show off how rich you are. Obviously if you want to tell time well, a $5 quartz Timex will still be more accurate

  • @mr.jawlineyoumad5416
    @mr.jawlineyoumad5416 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    the total cost to make this timepiece is 230000$ what a rip offffff

  • @yopackieslots
    @yopackieslots 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    car on my wrist and house on my neck.

  • @petruchio45
    @petruchio45 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    My dream watch?😜

  • @imurdered
    @imurdered 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wtf did they just say?

    • @ericlaurendeau4816
      @ericlaurendeau4816 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A tourbillon that has gravity..??? I understood jack shit

  • @ZurriyetBlogs
    @ZurriyetBlogs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    too expensive, 3 rolls royce !!!!

  • @qwertyman9560
    @qwertyman9560 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The design looks too busy

  • @jibreelaziz8187
    @jibreelaziz8187 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ugly ass watch 😂😂✔️💫

  • @karayv
    @karayv 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't know. Good luck selling it.

  • @tat8894
    @tat8894 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    who would walk around with a 1 million dollar watch on .

  • @johnadams-wp2yb
    @johnadams-wp2yb 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's fekking horrible.

  • @anxietylove6333
    @anxietylove6333 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    first

  • @joehua2580
    @joehua2580 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    with that money I will take a patek grand complication any day

    • @SamWade
      @SamWade 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Trust me, until you've seen a GF up close and tried one on, you will never understand truly how special they are. The Patek Grandmaster is very very special, but it's a bit of a brute. GF however are the exquisite execution of extreme complexity, but carried out in an a very visually stunning and simple way. And they finishing of a GF is literally second to no one. One of these would make a Patek Blush!!

    • @joehua2580
      @joehua2580 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think they are two different style, GF is more like roger dubuis or Hublot skeleton design, patek is just true timeless classic design. I still think 1.3 m is too overpriced just for it's design. Patek grandmaster chim is the most complicated wrist watch, this GF does look stunning but I think it is fair for 100k-250k top. of course it is just my opinion, I do believe 50 years later the grandmaster chim will sell over 10 million and this GF or some hublot will be lucky if it holds the value.

    • @SamWade
      @SamWade 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh completely! Patek will always be Patek. It will always hold value. Greubel Forseys are very contemporary, but trust me they are in a COMPLETELY different league to every other modern brand. I assure you that they will increase in value. Think of it more like a Damien Hurst piece. I promise you!

    • @Alan_Mariscal
      @Alan_Mariscal 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Joe Hua how dare you compare a GF with Hublot or Roger Dubuis lmao. 😂

    • @brettklenk4506
      @brettklenk4506 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only comparable brand is RM and that is a totally different style of watch. Possibly Kari Voutilainen or Vacheron Constantin are better contenders.

  • @jeffreylee4208
    @jeffreylee4208 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is just a copy cat of the Hublot Sapphire

    • @SamWade
      @SamWade 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Richard Mille we the first company to do a full saphire case! You could say that everyone copied them! 😉

    • @M855A1
      @M855A1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      and the hublot sapphire is a copy of the Richard Mille sapphire. LOL

    • @elliottatwell1155
      @elliottatwell1155 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Jeffrey Lee This is the dumbest thing that has ever been said about a watch; plenty of different high end companies can mill a block of sapphire for a case, that's not a copy anymore than another company using Titanium, carbon or ceramic. To compare a Hublot movement to a Greubel Forsey Double Tourbillon is just silly.