J Sai Deepak ji is absolutely right. I appreciate your all out efforts against misguided people of India. I am fond of your intelligence from Bangladesh.
Americans in the north USA and south USA look the same, Chinese in the north China and south China look the same, Russians in north Russia and south Russia look the same, take any country, people all over that country look the same, until and unless, that country has a history of invasion or colonisation and demolition of the local history...It happened in India, Aryan invasion happened in India and that's why North indians are so different looking than South Indians. Aryans and Dravidians are different races of people, belonging to different lands
The problem is not Google. The problem lies in the mindset that Google is always right. We need to come out of that. Unfortunately, everywhere in the world, facts have always been hidden from the general masses for promoting the propaganda which is always anti India. JSD has done exactly the opposite and I think it's time every Indian does the same in some or the other way and degree. Kudos to JSD for his enormous contribution towards understanding and representing India in its true essence.
First of all Google is an western platform, so they'll show only western propaganda and narratives first. Google individually doesn't have much information, Google just redirect us to certain websites and platform. Now it's on us should we believe on those websites or not, which country, which authors have written and running those websites needs to be evaluated first.
@@Mytbustr With what brain did you come to that conclusion? Or are you a sheep looking at others' fabricated work? How about looking at current research, which tells us that there have been a genetic continuity in Bharat/India going back 10,000+ years. In fact, after the African migration and settlement in India for a long period, there has been a migration out of India to Europe and other continents.
Yes. There's no Aryan invasion. If we agree with the Aryan invasion then the question arises that Aryan also migrated to other places other than india. There's sanskrit, varna ashrama dharma, vedantha etc only in India. Ok. If Aryan were the owner of sanskrit, then that would be prevalent in all places they migrated. If Aryan is from North then why are all the pancha bhutta stalas are in South india. Why aryan God parshuram is associated with Kerala. All Aryan Gods are black in color. So Aryan invasion is a myth created by the British to divide our society to rule.
The Mongols committed genocide in places previously occupied by what would have been the Aryans. The Islamic caliphate/empires also wiped out various cultural identities, including that of western India. Although Islam was bad, the Mongols literally had a policy of killing everyone, so much so that CO2 levels decreased measurably as a result of the decrease in the global human population.
Sai Ji is a true sapoot of Bharat. His knowledge, talents and scholarship must be utilized. He should be made chief of NCERT or UGC and be made responsible for educating the coming generations.
Jaja, Did he show you any research based article? He is argoloesist or antrologyiest? Or linguisticiest? Did he or you know what was recently found results in keeladi and kodumudi sites in Tamilnadu? Can you show a single religion evidenceon these sites? Atlest do you age of Tamil Bharmi script? Fake un scientific sangi's.
@@vyogana Yes he has shown research- read his books. One can wake up the sleeping but not the who is pretending to be sleep. Congress-Communist-Jihadi gangs and their ass-lickers pretend to sleep selectively. Pray tell, what research Romila Thapar did that is being taught for decades ?
@@bkk5153 jaja, As always no straight answers. Addional questions, did he published research work in any international journals on this topic? Or his book recommended as the textbook book for any research subjects of anthropology in any reputed university? Anyone write a scientific fake history book like ramayanam and bhagabaratham. If you can or dare answer my all pervious and these additional questions in stright. Please stop your rama Krishna stories in Tamilnadu. We are much more progressive than your sangi's India
Most Amazing and Interesting Speech by Sai Deepak. !! His Clarity and articulate way of Giving answers is really unparallel. Always enjoy Listening to Sai Deepak for his Versatility and amazing Knowledge of our ancient History and Culture.👌👌👌❤💘💘
@@Shiva_20 smith is not a cast name, Yadav is. Until and unless hindus are ready to shed their cast identity, there is no proper hindu religion. You can fool yourself saying this is remembering one's ancestors.
@@vasanthirajiv9707 You will not reach anu where by denying social realities. Cast is absent in western societies. So they can use surnames like that. Thats not the case with hinduism. Caste based discrimination is still a hot reality here. and caste is the single most reason for the weakness of hindus in front of muslims. You cant have the luxury of both indulging in your caste supremacy and having a strong religion.
@@Mytbustr He starts with "I don't have an understanding of DNA, genealogy, or archaeology, but my interpretation of literature is...". Sai is retarded, literature is the most inaccurate sources of history, they are fables and lies. Science is irrefutable, and DNA shows proof of the Aryan invasion theory.
Sanskrit is not oldest language. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
70 years congress agenda was गरीबी हटाव....For that they made 7 years planning and planning commission. Did this old man accept that congress failed to eradicate the poverty but successful to create a vicious circle of poverty in its 70 years.
Sanskrit is not oldest language...Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
There is one ancient temple in Gudimallam Village near Tirupati air port which has a lot of interesting features. Lingam in that temple represents earliest concepts of gods of Bharat.Though the temple is said to be from second century BC , lingam appears to be much more older. How did Aryan gods appear in South India few thousand years back without any such from north India? This temple needs a lot of study to prove or disprove Aryan invasion.
Sanskrit is not oldest language. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
That Uncle the moment he asked the question i know what JSD is going to reply back.. However, JSD with utmost respect to his age replied in a very non JSD way LOL.. if the other person would have been of my age.. i am sure he would have knocked him out with his ruthlessness yet factual answers... but i somehow felt that uncle still got some ego left in him... each to his own.. i am nobody to judge somebody..
If you read some of the literature written during the early 1900s or late 1800s by Indian authors they all regurgitate this Aryan-Dravidian narrative. This includes even authors who were practicing Hindus. That was the level to which our own people had been brainwashed by these ideas put together by the foreigner deliberately to undermine India's contributions to the world. Our own people didn't question these theories or offer a counter narrative. The first person to rubbish this Aryan theory was Swami Vivekananda (to my limited knowledge) although at that time he didn't do it on the basis of genetics or evidence. He took the position that the whole of Bharat and all its people are Arya (i.e. noble). It is only today that some of our own Indic scholars have come up with theories like 'Out of India' as a counter to the Aryan Migration Theory. So it is not surprising that the older generation (like the old man) still believes in the Aryan-Dravidian narratives. I assume JSD knew that reality and perhaps that is why he went easy on the old man asking the question using Google as some sort of definitive source to understand this complex topic. But you can see JSD's face when the question was asked - it was amusing to observe his facial reaction.
@@AshwinSriram There are a lot of people who noticed early on that Aryan Invasion was pure nonsense. Shri Arubindo for example. I think Tilak also said that. But Islamist + Leftist cabal was very successful in suppressing the truth.
Sometimes I feel south feel superior over North Indians and vice versa . We really need to unite as Hindus irrespective of diff language and colour - reason is just climate in south it is hot and in south it is cold . Btw am dogra from Jammu but first of all am a sanatani
People get richer they start having superiority complex which is present everywhere instead of rectifying them we should work towards better so people can sit with equal footing I have seen south people beating and slapping poor Bihari’s but it couldn’t change until Biharis make Bihar better and stop migrating. I am from Rajasthan and I can understand superiority complex before emergency we were one of the richest states with highest. Number of army personnel’s but Indira Gandhi all the gold now Rajasthan is one of the worst performing state it Is due to our own negligence. So in the end people who are more reacher than us will feel superior currently southern people have more money then northern once thus they have superiority complex .
@@chilpeeps haha bro same with jammu jammu is rich and not a british colony search the maharaja hari sing and the joke of the day is rajasthan and jammu comes on no 1 and no 2 in unemployment
You are not a south Indian. You are an Aryan. Please unite as Hindus and go back to your original country-the Steppes of Central Asia and live with your cousins the Iranians and the Europeans. You have made a mess of this country with your inhuman caste system. Please take all the south Indian Hindus who speak all those funny languages like Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam and god only knows. They are ''chocolate'' Aryans. Take them with you. Show them their original homeland. With so much of problems we are trying to live our lives peacefully, but these Aryans and Dravidians are creating new problems every day.
@@chilpeeps welcome to Mumbai Having billionaires living in the city and it's not in south it's in west. Been born and brought up here never treated a small town guy as inferior.
For everyone asking which book he is talking about towards the end , it is "India that is Bharath". I have had it & read it. It's a bit high level English. Lol But read it slowly & multiple times you will get your answers about 'who is the original inhabitant of India" . If you are wondering which books he refered in his one hour speech at "Tamil Nadu Dialogues" or somewhere recently - he doesn't mention it here. We will probably have to find that hour long speech & listen to see what books he names. But yeah, first book where he directly answers the question in the title is his first book India that is Bharath. Edit - the straight answer is "Aryan invasion theory is a hoax". Long answer of why it is hoax, who created it & propagated it is in his book. The first section he talks about is 150 pages it addresses in detail (with books& citations) everything about coloniality, indigenous faiths,entrenchment if coloniality through European political structures , decoloniality etc..
Just at an academic level, who are the first inhabitants? Not between Aryan/Dravidian or anything. What is the rough progression of people into India and how did they settle? I don't buy into the Aryan Dravidian hoax either. It would be nice to know this progression. If you can answer this in short that would be nice.
@@ranjanrajagopalan6194 Read About Dashrajya Yuddh mentioned in Rig Ved 10th Mandala The 10 clans of the defeated kings were expelled by King Sudas and some of them migrated towards Europe and while some migrated north of Bharat This Means Arya Migration happened,But the inhabitants of Bharat migrated towards Europe and not vice versa
@@kartikchaturvedi7146 Yeah,they were from NW Akhand Bharat(Afghanistan, Pakistan) and some Eastern part of Iran Hear about the Yamnaya Invasion of Europe from "Abhijit Chavda"(TH-camr),There you will find all the info about history
I’ve noticed the same thing. If they do adress the migration theory they just tacitly oversee it as just another name for the same concept as the invasion theory. The reality is that no one believes or even considers the invasion theory anymore (not since at least a half century), unless they are extreme white nationalists and or neo-nazis ..
Read any history textbook in india ...its taught as aryan invasion theory..dont dilute the concept to push the narrative...aryan invasion to aryan migration
I'm glad someone else pointed this out. It seems to me that this dude and the others have built themselves an effective strawman in *Aryan Invasion theory.* They "debunk" and "destroy" when not a single serious scholar or researcher takes the theory seriously anymore. And, turns out, they spend no time to debate actually science, which is the *Indo-Aryan Migration theory*, which they have effectively conflated to be the Invasion theory.
If a 5000 year old skeletons from Indian subcontinent does not contain any steppe pastoralist gene in them . That means Indo European language speaking steppe pastoralist or Aryan's did not existed during Indus valley civilization period . Sanskrit did not originated from Indian subcontinent
If a 5000 year old skeletons from Indian subcontinent does not contain any steppe pastoralist gene in them . That means Indo European language speaking steppe pastoralist or Aryan's did not existed during Indus valley civilization period . Sanskrit did not originated from Indian subcontinent
Its saddening when you see how mislead are the senior intellectuals of india. How can such an educated old citizen thoroughly believes in aryan theory and dare to say that gap between poor and rich has gone more wider in the past 5 years.
@@losblancos6462 he is quiet right my sociology professor is a brahman but he is very hinduphobic and anti india. we have to listen to his senseless bullshit every day.
Sanskrit is not oldest language. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization.... Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
Mr Aravindan Neelakandan has written a good narration of the history of India in his recent book. It kinda of complements what Mr Sai Jai Deepak is sharing in his talks
@@nitikakolnad8465 Interestingly the same people say North India protected South India from Invasions. If there is no invasion what did North India protect South from? Did North did not invade South?
I humbly urge our central government to utilize the intelligence and knowledge of respected J Sai Deepak ji to rectify the myths and falsehood which we are being taught since 1947. Hail to honourable J Sai Deepak ji.
When I visited Ooty in 2012-13, there was a region in Nilagiri hills where we were not allowed to enter. We were told that that area was given to adi-vaasis. Also note that Aadi-vaasi is a Tamil word. The question is, why would English/western people use a Tamil word to refer them? Secondly if invasion (I would remove the word Aryan for clarity) theory is incorrect, can you please explain me why in this land that starts from Kanyakumari to Kashimir or even west, we have so many differences, i.e., languages, food, utensils type, dress, culture or religions (this includes the ones combined by Adi Sankara)? And why so many hierarchies & differences based on their second names? At least Invasion Theory tried to answer some of these questions. If that is not true, then propose a theory that would answer these questions? Don't try to fool yourself by saying that there are or were no differences, suppression and neglect-tions in this land (i.e., like saying earth is flat, not round).
He said Aryan invasion theory is incorrect. He never said someone called "Aryans" never came to the Indian subcontinent. India has been a place of travellers, immigrants since millennia. They have come, settled, syncretised in every way possible. Hence the huge medley of cultures. Plus, like he said, read his first book. You will likely get all your answers.
What makes more sense is that ancient Indians migrated out of India instead of Aryans migrating into India. India has always had a high population historically, so, a land with higher population throughout time means that People from that land likely migrated out instead of migrating in. Heck, even the 'gypsies' in Europe were a bunch of North Indians that migrated out of India more than 1,000 years ago. The reason for skin color difference amongst Indians is similar to skin color difference amongst People in other Countries, those who spent doing labor out in the sun were darker, those who spent time indoors away from the sun were lighter, those who lived in areas with high sunlight were darker, those who lived in the mountainous regions or in the colder regions were lighter. If you go to Europe, People in Italy are darker than People in Scandinavian countries, does that mean Italians were some other group of People who migrated into Italy? Or it's just a matter of geography and climate.
So grateful to have you , sir Sai deepak ji amongst us . Very blessed to be at the receiving end of your hard work and knowledge and cannot thank you enough . May the lords choicest blessings always be with you and your family 🙏🏽
You can believe what you wish to but the reality is that there was indeed an aryan migration to India. Hordes of steppe tribesmen migrated to India over several centuries and their progeny formed the vedic culture of whats now called India. Hinduism was brought to India by these people. Now I don't consider them foreigners or anything. Their ancestral contribution to indians' genepool ranges from 6% to 25%. So we don't have to really deny their invasions. 25% means that their genetic contribution is like your paternal grandfather. Sanskrit is like your paternal grandfathers heritage, even tho 75% of Indians ancestry comes from South Asia itself. But aryans? They are our ancestors! Why deny them? The genetic evidence is undeniable. I accept the Aryans migrated in waves to India but I also consider Hindu culture my own even tho it came from the outside.
@@Gabbargaamada ooo then Ramayana and Mahabharata are then supposedly Aryan texts .Then why are people of mahabharat mentioned in Tamil Sangam literature and buddhist Jatakas in sri lanka
Aryan word came from the Sanskrit word Arya, or cultivated people. According to Bal Gangadhar Tilak the Aryans had their origin in the Arctic Circle of Russia before the last Ice Age, before 27000 BC. At the time of the Ice Age they came to India, which was Ice free but they lost everything during the flood that followed after the Ice Age, possibly in 17000 BC. They developed new civilization in India. In about 6000 BC some of them, called themselves Asuras, went out of India and went to Iran, Iraq, Syria, Armenia and Russia, Ukraine, Bulgaria and Greece. There are Genetic evidence. These civilzations are related. Western mainly the Anglo-American historians are propagating a false history that the Aryans came to India in 1500 BC. Thus, according to them all the characters of Ramayana and Mahabharatas are non-Aryans. Ramayana was about 9000BC and Mahabharata is about 7000 BC. Reference: Hall, HR ,1939, A Season of Work at Ur, Al-Ubaid, Abu Shahrain (Eridu) and Elsewhere:Being an Unofficial Account of the British Museum Archaeological Mission to Babylonia, London: Methuen Oak, N., 2011, Mystery of Arundhuti, Atlanta: Danphe Inc. Pravda, 2005, ‘Ancient Aryan civilization achieved incredible technological progress 40 centuries ago’, 16 July 2005 Tilak, Bal Gangadhara, 1903, The Arctic Home in the Vedas, Messrs. Tilak Brothers, Pune. Guseva, N. R. 1995. Induism: Aryi, Slaviane. Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology. Oak, N., 2011, When Did The Mahabharata War Happen?, Atlanta: Danphe Inc Oak, N., 2014, The Historic Rama: Indian Civilization at the End of Pleistocene, Scotts Valley, California: CreateSpace. Zharnikova, S. V. 1986. K voprosu o vozmozhnoi lokalizatsii sviashchennykh gor Meru i Khary indoiranskoi (ariiskoi) mifologii. Informatsionnyi bulleten’ Mezhdunarodnoi assotsiatsii po izucheniiu kul’tur Tsentral’noi Azii 11:31-44.
Aryans, derived from the original Sanskrit word Arya, means cultivated educated person, according to Sri Aurobindo, used to have very high moral standard with great regard for truth, promise and hospitality. Their sages, or Rishis, after many years of meditations and learning, derived some great ideas or hymns(Riks) on God and universe. Recent DNA evidence shows that Europe experienced a massive population influx from the east, beginning around 4,500 years from the present. Several haplo-groups were involved in this expansion, including the Indian-origin R1a1a. This was almost a total replacement event, which indicates that Indo-Aryans, among others, expanded westward into Europe and to a large extent replaced indigenous European males and their Y-chromosome strata (Sharma and his associates, 2009) This genetic evidence indicates that several Y-chromosomal (patrilineal) lineages, one of which was the Indian-origin R1a1a, gave rise to the modern European population. Out of these lineages, R1a1a is the most widespread and numerous. Recent DNA evidence shows that Europe experienced a massive population influx from the east, beginning around 4,500 years from the present. Several haplo-groups were involved in this expansion, including the Indian-origin R1a1a. This was almost a total replacement event, which indicates that Indo-Aryans, among others, expanded westward into Europe and to a large extent replaced indigenous European males and their Y-chromosome strata (Sharma and his associates, 2009) This genetic evidence indicates that several Y-chromosomal (patrilineal) lineages, one of which was the Indian-origin R1a1a, gave rise to the modern European population. Out of these lineages, R1a1a is the most widespread and numerous. It proves that: 1. The R1a haplogroup originated in India. 2. The Indo-Aryan people have lived in India for at least 15,450 years, which invalidates the theory that the Indo-Aryans invaded India 3,500 years ago. 3. The hundreds of millions of members (possibly over a billion) of the R1a family living across the world today - a very large fraction of humanity - are all descended from one single male ancestor who lived in India at least 15,450 years ago. This discovery demonstrates the close genetic (and hence linguistic and cultural) affinity of Indians with the Russian and Polish people, the Vikings and Normans, and with the ancient Scythians and Tocharians, among many others (Sharma et al, 2009). References: Sharma S., 2009, The Indian origin of paternal haplogroup R1a1* substantiates the autochthonous origin of Brahmins and the caste system. Journal of Human Genetics, 54, 47-55 Sarker, A., A., Deshpande , A., Mukherjee, M. K., Bera,, B., Das, N., Juyal, P., Morthekai, R. D. , Deshpande, V. S., Shinde, V., & Rao, L. S., 2016, Oxygen isotope in archaeological bioapatites from India: Implications to climate change and decline of Bronze Age Harappan civilization, Nature, Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 26555.
Sanskrit is not oldest language...Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
Aryans migrated from Central Asia over hundreds of years n brought along with them their culture and language. They slowly assimilated n incorporated pre vedic Gods into their belief structure.
Aryan never attack us this is propoganda by muller n macaulay for division in india so brits rule And bharat original name is aryabharta jambudweep bharatkhand our bharat is huge and we rule 60%of land this world .. During chakrawarthi samrat vikram aditya n his evidence in turkey sher e okul ..
Sanskrit is not oldest language.... Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
If Aryan invitation theory is true then how Malayalam language become the most sanskritised language in the world and the highest forms of anciant hinduisam still we only see in the Malabar region in Kerala
The Aryan invasion or any invasion is mistaken as an overnight act or a short term conquering activity beyond which "everything changed as per the conqueror". Its not an instant act or a change that happened overnight and for that matter its not even a deliberate act. When the matter is presented as a complaint like "they said India was invaded", then the resistance comes into place to disprove this theory - whereas this theory is concocted and misunderstood by many as the theory itself is also very loosely coupled. The invasion is a daily event - it happens even today. Today a north indian wearing a sweater in a moderate south indian winter can be looked upon as a "cultural invasion" whereas he or she is driven by habit or survival instinct out of a harsher northerly winter without any malintention!! We can see colonies of outsiders in any city/village and for that matter in a state/country - today when indians do it abroad, the Indian media celebrate it as "great diaspora moment". Back then as well Indians did it - Indians understand it as their pride though - but what Ashoka and Kanishka did were also invasions into south east asia. Back then, there were mostly display of survival instinct and power and very rarely greed - "if i dont excercise my power, somebody else would dethrone me, so i better do it" was the main motive back then apart from survival from hatsh climatic conditions. There were also cultural exchanges depicted as invasion today, which originally could be in search of good living conditions - naturally, in comparison to the extreme cold (Europe), dry and arid (Middle East, Africa) Indian peninsula might have been a compelling geography. Believe me, there wouldn't have been any other motive - invading culture, religion etc is a very recent narration for the actual act of survivals done back then, when hunger, survival from harsh climate, health etc are taken care, these (invasion of my culture, my religion under threat etc) are just tools in an idle minds workshop!!!
Hi SAI.. My name is Ravi Sunkara and I am writing this from USA. Only recently I started watching your videos. I wonder from where you got this gnanam, you are some what resembles Andi Shankar’s charya. We have similar thoughts like you but no knowledge to defend them like you do. You are a great soul and came to this world for some purpose. I wish our ways cross somewhere and I will get an opportunity to see you and talk to you. I wish under you Our Sanathsna Dharma will regain its past glory. OM NAMO VENKATESA
Sanskrit is not oldest language.. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
This guy never answered the gentleman's question before the audience. He shamelessly deviated from the point. The comments section has also not questioned his behavior. This is breakdown of logic !
Sanskrit is not oldest language...Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
I read his book (the 1st section and the 1st chapter) nowhere has he mentioned the answer to the old man's question. He is just deflecting at that moment
A perfect and graceful answer to the brown sepoys and left- inclined individuals who claim hinduism is a concoction to indian nationalists of the late 19 th century , and it is an amalgamation of various indigenous cultures , appropriated by Brahmins.
If Aryan Invasion theory is wrong why did govt allowed in CBSE syllabus ?? Why universities allowed Aryan Invasion theory in syllabus? So Govt is right or Universities are right?
@@songs1093it's just a western propaganda bro, trying to divide India's diversity, if sanskrit is western language then why there isn't any 3000 yo proof outside India , also if Vedas were there then why do they embrace indian rivers and mountains , also it mentions aryavart which was ruled by native Indian kings during Mahabharata, like kaurav
Okay, but where is the answer to those specific questions? As per the video title, he didn't agree with the Aryan invasion theory but then what is the history?
@@skull_bonet1 the Panchangams that we follow say Yudhishtira Sakam 4000+ years ago and Kaliyuga 5000+ years old. This history is right in front of our faces. We have Kamba Ramayanam (from south) and Ramcharitmanas from Tulsidas in the north - so everyone has always been here and as one. The Mahabharata says that Pandyas fought in the war - does our history books say that?
You get all sorts of stuff in Google. Cannot take information therein at face value. There should be further investigation always. Furthermore, writing to Google is a waste of time.
Only two books written by sd uptill now studied by me,I completely changed by my thought process, enlightened tremendously.debating with facts.searching authentic source.Recommend to study these books.
People started to clap right after the first statement of his reply which was "I disagree with your question fundamentally". It clearly says what the audience wants to hear which he continued. I don't know clearly about AIT but it's the advantage of choosing the audience smartly. So, you don't need to say the truth you need to say just what they want to hear.
He is a good speaker. In this speech, he just speaks like a politician by siting stories and not facts. And people love him for it. Because they just want to her stories. So, yeah he chooses his audience smartly, lol!
Guess you don't know what satire or sarcasm means. In just one statement he ridiculed the exaggeration in the question. So according to you the question was also based on stories and not facts. Also what do you mean by truth? History right? Then it the known by stories written by authors/historians. So you statement is just shows your ignorance.
@@bharatmirchi Just because I don't agree with this view, I'm ignorant? I don't know sarcasm..?? Sorry, there is no point in speaking to 4-year-olds who cannot distinguish facts from made-up stories. Shoo..go read Billoo or Akbar and Birbal!
@Vel A Triggered son? No one cares about your opinion. Everyone has the right to agree/disagree with the views of public speakers. But when you call views of well-educated and well-versed author a story, justify it with some facts..kid
Things doesn't work like that those who agree with you or belief same thing will be with you no matter what like if someone say earth is not flat people will say he is right even without thinking or referring to his argument because they share same beliefs labelling them as choosed audience would be incorrect so to speak
I don't think SJD made any statement here, he went from Aryan invasion theory to medical mafia but didn't answer the question, 'who were the original habitats of current day India and how it changes whether interms of invasions or migrations? '
Aryan "invasion" might be the wrong word but aryans from steppe regions have migrated to india after the decline of IVC. Vedic period is basically their rise and expansion within north west india
I assume when you say the Aryan Invasion theory is wrong , you must have compelling reasons to say so. Could you please provide references for a. Facts that conclusively point to the Aryan theory being wrong b. Facts that conclusively point to the alternate theory that you propose
Invasion may be wrong but not migration. Aryan Migration is backed up by Genetics, Linguistics and Archeological research studies. The Rakhigarhi DNA report, sinauli excavation, Keeladi site findings, similarity of Sanskrit with other Indo European languages all prove Aryan migration. OIT is not at all supported by mainstream academia.
Aryan migration/invasion however you call it both of them happened simultaneously in harappa History is so much complex even if you try to simplify it you can't! The genetical evidence alone prove Aryan conquest of harappa They brought Hinduism and created castism to oppress native Indians and keep their bloodline pure
They invaded in the name of culture.They introduced new gods and customs,rituals etc. Vedic culture spoiled India. Our forefathers could not get basic education because of vedic culture.Just do pooja and some customs show urself as pious and pure to the society.
Sanskrit is not oldest language... Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof. 1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C. 2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C 3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago.. This is the mainly Proof .. India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable 1.) Tamizhi inscription 2.)Poly language inscription 3.)Ashoca inscription 4.)Devanagari inscription.. 5.)SANSKRIT inscription Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available.. Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams. 1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association. Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD. The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature. Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu.. As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages.. Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
The people in the comments are brainwashed. Let them be. Let them believe in this fake Indian superiority belief In the long run, we will see how this Hindu supremacy negatively affects India. Then these people will understand and by then, it will be too late. Wise people will run away from this nation in the near future, mark my words. The data doesn't lie, Lakhs of HNI's already gave up Indian citizenship
Interestingly the same people say North India protected South India from Invasions. If there is no invasion what did North India protect South from? Did North did not invade South?
J Sai Deepak ji is absolutely right. I appreciate your all out efforts against misguided people of India. I am fond of your intelligence from Bangladesh.
No He is absolutely wrong. Hinduism is false like all other religions. Your vedas has no value. All the scriptures are garbage. Be an atheist.
@@akr357-o5u bloody fool, stop your mouth.
U are not from Bangladesh
Yes he is a persecuted bangla hindu.
Americans in the north USA and south USA look the same, Chinese in the north China and south China look the same, Russians in north Russia and south Russia look the same, take any country, people all over that country look the same, until and unless, that country has a history of invasion or colonisation and demolition of the local history...It happened in India, Aryan invasion happened in India and that's why North indians are so different looking than South Indians. Aryans and Dravidians are different races of people, belonging to different lands
The problem is not Google. The problem lies in the mindset that Google is always right. We need to come out of that. Unfortunately, everywhere in the world, facts have always been hidden from the general masses for promoting the propaganda which is always anti India. JSD has done exactly the opposite and I think it's time every Indian does the same in some or the other way and degree. Kudos to JSD for his enormous contribution towards understanding and representing India in its true essence.
Absolutely right Google is not always right
First of all Google is an western platform, so they'll show only western propaganda and narratives first.
Google individually doesn't have much information, Google just redirect us to certain websites and platform. Now it's on us should we believe on those websites or not, which country, which authors have written and running those websites needs to be evaluated first.
Whatsapp is right 😜😜😜😜
Dravadia are different race people....aryans different race came from steppes...it is not theory ...it is reality
@@Mytbustr With what brain did you come to that conclusion? Or are you a sheep looking at others' fabricated work? How about looking at current research, which tells us that there have been a genetic continuity in Bharat/India going back 10,000+ years. In fact, after the African migration and settlement in India for a long period, there has been a migration out of India to Europe and other continents.
Yes. There's no Aryan invasion. If we agree with the Aryan invasion then the question arises that Aryan also migrated to other places other than india. There's sanskrit, varna ashrama dharma, vedantha etc only in India. Ok. If Aryan were the owner of sanskrit, then that would be prevalent in all places they migrated.
If Aryan is from North then why are all the pancha bhutta stalas are in South india. Why aryan God parshuram is associated with Kerala. All Aryan Gods are black in color.
So Aryan invasion is a myth created by the British to divide our society to rule.
Aryan invasion propaganda has 100s plotholes
Based on ved description of gods they come in various colours...
True. Aryan invasion theory is crap
I agree ...
Shri Ram was dark skinned, shri krishna was dark skinned, Shiva is dark skinned, Vishnu ji is dark skinned...
The Mongols committed genocide in places previously occupied by what would have been the Aryans. The Islamic caliphate/empires also wiped out various cultural identities, including that of western India. Although Islam was bad, the Mongols literally had a policy of killing everyone, so much so that CO2 levels decreased measurably as a result of the decrease in the global human population.
i envy Sai ...he is way younger than me and if I had at least 1% of his knowledge I would have been happy..
Please start reading. It’s never too late.
Bro you have more than 10% of his knowledge you just gotta start believing yourself
Knowledge never makes u happy but takes ur happier chunk of it
@@gaganahari4641Ya, but I can spare happiness for knowledge :)
People like you make me feel confident
Sai Ji is a true sapoot of Bharat. His knowledge, talents and scholarship must be utilized. He should be made chief of NCERT or UGC and be made responsible for educating the coming generations.
Jaja, Did he show you any research based article? He is argoloesist or antrologyiest? Or linguisticiest? Did he or you know what was recently found results in keeladi and kodumudi sites in Tamilnadu? Can you show a single religion evidenceon these sites? Atlest do you age of Tamil Bharmi script? Fake un scientific sangi's.
@@vyogana Yes he has shown research- read his books. One can wake up the sleeping but not the who is pretending to be sleep. Congress-Communist-Jihadi gangs and their ass-lickers pretend to sleep selectively. Pray tell, what research Romila Thapar did that is being taught for decades ?
@@vyogana ya bro I also thought same 😂😂😂 i don't know why people belive in these type of 😂😂😂 useless explaintions
@@bkk5153 jaja, As always no straight answers. Addional questions, did he published research work in any international journals on this topic? Or his book recommended as the textbook book for any research subjects of anthropology in any reputed university? Anyone write a scientific fake history book like ramayanam and bhagabaratham. If you can or dare answer my all pervious and these additional questions in stright. Please stop your rama Krishna stories in Tamilnadu. We are much more progressive than your sangi's India
@@vyogana Do you have the courage to call Bible and Quran as unscientific, fake history books in progressive TamilNadu ?
I'm so so proud of you jai sai for your courage, knowledge and intellect. Ma bharti ka ashirvaad aap par sada bana rahe. 🙌🙌🙌👋👋👋
He is absolutely wrong
Most Amazing and Interesting Speech by Sai Deepak. !! His Clarity and articulate way of Giving answers is really unparallel. Always enjoy Listening to Sai Deepak for his Versatility and amazing Knowledge of our ancient History and Culture.👌👌👌❤💘💘
We are Hindus , there is no races at all , And our practice is Sanathana Dharma🚩🧡🇮🇳
Great.
What does this yadav mean ?
@@Malabarswamy yadav is his kull .
Will Smith, what dose Smith means in that .
People use surname all over the world to remember there ancestors .
@@Shiva_20 smith is not a cast name, Yadav is. Until and unless hindus are ready to shed their cast identity, there is no proper hindu religion. You can fool yourself saying this is remembering one's ancestors.
@@Malabarswamy thot Smith meant a profession and indirectly grouped like a caste
@@vasanthirajiv9707 You will not reach anu where by denying social realities. Cast is absent in western societies. So they can use surnames like that. Thats not the case with hinduism. Caste based discrimination is still a hot reality here. and caste is the single most reason for the weakness of hindus in front of muslims. You cant have the luxury of both indulging in your caste supremacy and having a strong religion.
The very interesting point is how he changed his tone while addressing an older person. Really Admirable!
Your confidence and clarity on your subjects is truly incredible. There is lot to learn from you,sir.
Dravadia are different race people....aryans different race came from steppes...it is not theory ...it is reality
@@Mytbustr He starts with "I don't have an understanding of DNA, genealogy, or archaeology, but my interpretation of literature is...". Sai is retarded, literature is the most inaccurate sources of history, they are fables and lies. Science is irrefutable, and DNA shows proof of the Aryan invasion theory.
Sanskrit is not oldest language. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof.
1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C.
2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C
3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam
Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago..
This is the mainly Proof ..
India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable
1.) Tamizhi inscription
2.)Poly language inscription
3.)Ashoca inscription
4.)Devanagari inscription..
5.)SANSKRIT inscription
Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available..
Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams.
1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association.
Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD.
The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature.
Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu..
As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages..
Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
@sigma_01460 oh my God,... again vague reply...
@@Mytbustr I totally agree with you. Aryans invaded indus valley
Very well analysed, thank you. I want to congratulate you for upholding the truth🙏
70 years congress agenda was गरीबी हटाव....For that they made 7 years planning and planning commission. Did this old man accept that congress failed to eradicate the poverty but successful to create a vicious circle of poverty in its 70 years.
Along with poverty appeseament and freebies increased or you can say because of these two poverty increased
Plus vicious cycle of Castes as well
Sanskrit is not oldest language...Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof.
1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C.
2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C
3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam
Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago..
This is the mainly Proof ..
India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable
1.) Tamizhi inscription
2.)Poly language inscription
3.)Ashoca inscription
4.)Devanagari inscription..
5.)SANSKRIT inscription
Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available..
Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams.
1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association.
Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD.
The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature.
Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu..
As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages..
Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
There is one ancient temple in Gudimallam Village near Tirupati air port which has a lot of interesting features. Lingam in that temple represents earliest concepts of gods of Bharat.Though the temple is said to be from second century BC , lingam appears to be much more older. How did Aryan gods appear in South India few thousand years back without any such from north India? This temple needs a lot of study to prove or disprove Aryan invasion.
They believe rama Krishna are aryan gods like wtf but believe in vahamana avatar of vishnu and vishnu himself like logic died then and there
Exactly, Indra is in Tolkappiyam
Sanskrit is not oldest language. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof.
1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C.
2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C
3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam
Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago..
This is the mainly Proof ..
India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable
1.) Tamizhi inscription
2.)Poly language inscription
3.)Ashoca inscription
4.)Devanagari inscription..
5.)SANSKRIT inscription
Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available..
Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams.
1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association.
Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD.
The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature.
Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu..
As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages..
Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
Only God Rudra is dravidian ...and all forest gods ...like kantara spirit.....rest all Aryan gods
That Uncle the moment he asked the question i know what JSD is going to reply back.. However, JSD with utmost respect to his age replied in a very non JSD way LOL.. if the other person would have been of my age.. i am sure he would have knocked him out with his ruthlessness yet factual answers... but i somehow felt that uncle still got some ego left in him... each to his own.. i am nobody to judge somebody..
But there is no proof of Aryan migration
If you read some of the literature written during the early 1900s or late 1800s by Indian authors they all regurgitate this Aryan-Dravidian narrative. This includes even authors who were practicing Hindus. That was the level to which our own people had been brainwashed by these ideas put together by the foreigner deliberately to undermine India's contributions to the world. Our own people didn't question these theories or offer a counter narrative. The first person to rubbish this Aryan theory was Swami Vivekananda (to my limited knowledge) although at that time he didn't do it on the basis of genetics or evidence. He took the position that the whole of Bharat and all its people are Arya (i.e. noble).
It is only today that some of our own Indic scholars have come up with theories like 'Out of India' as a counter to the Aryan Migration Theory. So it is not surprising that the older generation (like the old man) still believes in the Aryan-Dravidian narratives. I assume JSD knew that reality and perhaps that is why he went easy on the old man asking the question using Google as some sort of definitive source to understand this complex topic. But you can see JSD's face when the question was asked - it was amusing to observe his facial reaction.
@@AshwinSriram There are a lot of people who noticed early on that Aryan Invasion was pure nonsense. Shri Arubindo for example. I think Tilak also said that. But Islamist + Leftist cabal was very successful in suppressing the truth.
Even though I support Sai bit this looks like a preconceived loaded question .. and I say wholeheartedly nothing wrong with that.
@@prasaddd Aryan migration is a myth no matter who you support or not.
The Ben Shapiros & the Dinesh D'souzas & the Jordan Petersons don't stand a chance when JSD steps up to the mic! 💖😅
absolutely !!
How can you even think of comparing a thief like DD with JSD?
As in who is more stupid ? And fake news peddler
OMG lol
They have quite different professions there is no fair match.
With sheer Humbleness-"I disagree fundamentally with your question" this is SAI for U
Sometimes I feel south feel superior over North Indians and vice versa . We really need to unite as Hindus irrespective of diff language and colour - reason is just climate in south it is hot and in south it is cold . Btw am dogra from Jammu but first of all am a sanatani
People get richer they start having superiority complex which is present everywhere instead of rectifying them we should work towards better so people can sit with equal footing I have seen south people beating and slapping poor Bihari’s but it couldn’t change until Biharis make Bihar better and stop migrating.
I am from Rajasthan and I can understand superiority complex before emergency we were one of the richest states with highest. Number of army personnel’s but Indira Gandhi all the gold now Rajasthan is one of the worst performing state it Is due to our own negligence.
So in the end people who are more reacher than us will feel superior currently southern people have more money then northern once thus they have superiority complex .
@@chilpeeps haha bro same with jammu jammu is rich and not a british colony search the maharaja hari sing and the joke of the day is rajasthan and jammu comes on no 1 and no 2 in unemployment
Abolish caste system,which is highly dangerous for Hindus...and still some people inject it into the younger generation...
You are not a south Indian. You are an Aryan. Please unite as Hindus and go back to your original country-the Steppes of Central Asia and live with your cousins the Iranians and the Europeans. You have made a mess of this country with your inhuman caste system. Please take all the south Indian Hindus who speak all those funny languages like Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam and god only knows. They are ''chocolate'' Aryans. Take them with you. Show them their original homeland.
With so much of problems we are trying to live our lives peacefully, but these Aryans and Dravidians are creating new problems every day.
@@chilpeeps welcome to Mumbai
Having billionaires living in the city and it's not in south it's in west. Been born and brought up here never treated a small town guy as inferior.
For everyone asking which book he is talking about towards the end , it is "India that is Bharath". I have had it & read it. It's a bit high level English. Lol
But read it slowly & multiple times you will get your answers about 'who is the original inhabitant of India" .
If you are wondering which books he refered in his one hour speech at "Tamil Nadu Dialogues" or somewhere recently - he doesn't mention it here. We will probably have to find that hour long speech & listen to see what books he names.
But yeah, first book where he directly answers the question in the title is his first book India that is Bharath.
Edit - the straight answer is "Aryan invasion theory is a hoax". Long answer of why it is hoax, who created it & propagated it is in his book. The first section he talks about is 150 pages it addresses in detail (with books& citations) everything about coloniality, indigenous faiths,entrenchment if coloniality through European political structures , decoloniality etc..
Just at an academic level, who are the first inhabitants? Not between Aryan/Dravidian or anything. What is the rough progression of people into India and how did they settle? I don't buy into the Aryan Dravidian hoax either. It would be nice to know this progression. If you can answer this in short that would be nice.
@@ranjanrajagopalan6194 Read About Dashrajya Yuddh mentioned in Rig Ved 10th Mandala
The 10 clans of the defeated kings were expelled by King Sudas and some of them migrated towards Europe and while some migrated north of Bharat
This Means Arya Migration happened,But the inhabitants of Bharat migrated towards Europe and not vice versa
@@AYOSANATANI nice fact brother. thanks . so like this would mean that these people were from bharat only right ?
@@kartikchaturvedi7146 Yeah,they were from NW Akhand Bharat(Afghanistan, Pakistan) and some Eastern part of Iran
Hear about the Yamnaya Invasion of Europe from "Abhijit Chavda"(TH-camr),There you will find all the info about history
@@AYOSANATANI thanks bro
I admire this man for his knowledge and the clarity he has
It is interesting that the term "invasion" is only being used nowadays by opponents of the Indo-Aryan Migration theory.
I’ve noticed the same thing. If they do adress the migration theory they just tacitly oversee it as just another name for the same concept as the invasion theory. The reality is that no one believes or even considers the invasion theory anymore (not since at least a half century), unless they are extreme white nationalists and or neo-nazis ..
Read any history textbook in india ...its taught as aryan invasion theory..dont dilute the concept to push the narrative...aryan invasion to aryan migration
I'm glad someone else pointed this out. It seems to me that this dude and the others have built themselves an effective strawman in *Aryan Invasion theory.* They "debunk" and "destroy" when not a single serious scholar or researcher takes the theory seriously anymore.
And, turns out, they spend no time to debate actually science, which is the *Indo-Aryan Migration theory*, which they have effectively conflated to be the Invasion theory.
Migration/Invasion happened from Yamnayan nomads who were Vedic Aryas and they were Indian origin.
I saluteSri Sai Deepak for his signal contribution to the awakening of hindus from their slumber.
If a 5000 year old skeletons from Indian subcontinent does not contain any steppe pastoralist gene in them .
That means Indo European language speaking steppe pastoralist or Aryan's did not existed during Indus valley civilization period .
Sanskrit did not originated from Indian subcontinent
THIS is a brilliant argument by Sai Deepak about Adivasis and Dravidians.
If a 5000 year old skeletons from Indian subcontinent does not contain any steppe pastoralist gene in them .
That means Indo European language speaking steppe pastoralist or Aryan's did not existed during Indus valley civilization period .
Sanskrit did not originated from Indian subcontinent
Excellent presentation of factuals , appreciable the efforts of saiji, 👍
Dravadia are different race people....aryans different race came from steppes...it is not theory ...it is reality
This was the best talk I've watched, Thank yoou J sai Deepak sir.
Great speech !
Its saddening when you see how mislead are the senior intellectuals of india. How can such an educated old citizen thoroughly believes in aryan theory and dare to say that gap between poor and rich has gone more wider in the past 5 years.
@@losblancos6462 he is quiet right my sociology professor is a brahman but he is very hinduphobic and anti india. we have to listen to his senseless bullshit every day.
@Los Blancos lol...based on what, Romila Thapar fanboy....
@@losblancos6462 lol lol lol..
We are even learning these lies in our history books😂
NEP should release the books only after being verified by this patriotic honest genius 🇭🇺🔥🙏
Hahahha. Good. Send to rss ofc. There 10th fail nationalists will verify n then plus 1 students read n wrote exams. Good for all
@@aswanik40 4th fail are trying to pretend as an intellectual . dream on kidoo.
@@aswanik40here comes someone whose boss is 5th pass and an ex-bar dancer in italy
Sanskrit is not oldest language. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization.... Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof.
1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C.
2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C
3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam
Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago..
This is the mainly Proof ..
India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable
1.) Tamizhi inscription
2.)Poly language inscription
3.)Ashoca inscription
4.)Devanagari inscription..
5.)SANSKRIT inscription
Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available..
Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams.
1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association.
Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD.
The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature.
Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu..
As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages..
Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
Mr Aravindan Neelakandan has written a good narration of the history of India in his recent book. It kinda of complements what Mr Sai Jai Deepak is sharing in his talks
My audience will always remain my people first (Indians). Well said, JSD. 🙏
My respect to you..immensely ...as you breathe with knowledge and wisdom
Jai Shri Ram
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 🕉️🔱🚩🧘🏻♂️
Uncle got a huge jolt when his bubble of AIT exploded
What is AIT?
@@TheElixir007 ARYAN invasion theory
Uncle is fed by multiple ABBU JAANs of the FLAT PLANET 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
@@TheElixir007To know the AIT, please read Koenraad Elst......
@@nitikakolnad8465 Interestingly the same people say North India protected South India from Invasions. If there is no invasion what did North India protect South from? Did North did not invade South?
We have save support and protect these kind of people !
I humbly urge our central government to utilize the intelligence and knowledge of respected J Sai Deepak ji to rectify the myths and falsehood which we are being taught since 1947. Hail to honourable J Sai Deepak ji.
Aree bhai pr genetic evidence ko kaisa nakaroge
J Sai Deepak Sirji 🙏🙌
Sai Deepak has always been brilliant but this one has to be one of his best 👍🏾
The way he started with 'I disagree with your question' sealed topic.
When I visited Ooty in 2012-13, there was a region in Nilagiri hills where we were not allowed to enter. We were told that that area was given to adi-vaasis. Also note that Aadi-vaasi is a Tamil word. The question is, why would English/western people use a Tamil word to refer them?
Secondly if invasion (I would remove the word Aryan for clarity) theory is incorrect, can you please explain me why in this land that starts from Kanyakumari to Kashimir or even west, we have so many differences, i.e., languages, food, utensils type, dress, culture or religions (this includes the ones combined by Adi Sankara)? And why so many hierarchies & differences based on their second names? At least Invasion Theory tried to answer some of these questions. If that is not true, then propose a theory that would answer these questions?
Don't try to fool yourself by saying that there are or were no differences, suppression and neglect-tions in this land (i.e., like saying earth is flat, not round).
What JSD is saying regarding the term Adi-Vaasi is correct, the term Adi-Vaasi was coined in early 20th century.
He said Aryan invasion theory is incorrect. He never said someone called "Aryans" never came to the Indian subcontinent. India has been a place of travellers, immigrants since millennia. They have come, settled, syncretised in every way possible. Hence the huge medley of cultures.
Plus, like he said, read his first book. You will likely get all your answers.
without hearing a word from him. Sai Deepak Guru ji pranam 🙏🚩🚩
All 🙏 Sanatani Should Come Together Leaving aside their Caste, Race, Language and States. Only Then, We Will Be Able To Build a Strong 💪 India🚩🚩🚩.
What makes more sense is that ancient Indians migrated out of India instead of Aryans migrating into India.
India has always had a high population historically, so, a land with higher population throughout time means that People from that land likely migrated out instead of migrating in. Heck, even the 'gypsies' in Europe were a bunch of North Indians that migrated out of India more than 1,000 years ago.
The reason for skin color difference amongst Indians is similar to skin color difference amongst People in other Countries, those who spent doing labor out in the sun were darker, those who spent time indoors away from the sun were lighter, those who lived in areas with high sunlight were darker, those who lived in the mountainous regions or in the colder regions were lighter.
If you go to Europe, People in Italy are darker than People in Scandinavian countries, does that mean Italians were some other group of People who migrated into Italy? Or it's just a matter of geography and climate.
What a conceptual clarity 👏
I believe you Sir,I am proud of you.👍👏🙏🌹
Dravidians of South is having rich heritage, technology & they r the master mind of the early India
So grateful to have you , sir Sai deepak ji amongst us . Very blessed to be at the receiving end of your hard work and knowledge and cannot thank you enough . May the lords choicest blessings always be with you and your family 🙏🏽
I totally agree. Please somebody tell the fools here in Nepal that no Aryan came from anywhere. We are all indigenous DNA wise.
Please quote a scientific paper for your statement
You can believe what you wish to but the reality is that there was indeed an aryan migration to India. Hordes of steppe tribesmen migrated to India over several centuries and their progeny formed the vedic culture of whats now called India. Hinduism was brought to India by these people. Now I don't consider them foreigners or anything. Their ancestral contribution to indians' genepool ranges from 6% to 25%. So we don't have to really deny their invasions. 25% means that their genetic contribution is like your paternal grandfather. Sanskrit is like your paternal grandfathers heritage, even tho 75% of Indians ancestry comes from South Asia itself. But aryans? They are our ancestors! Why deny them? The genetic evidence is undeniable. I accept the Aryans migrated in waves to India but I also consider Hindu culture my own even tho it came from the outside.
@@Gabbargaamada ooo then Ramayana and Mahabharata are then supposedly Aryan texts .Then why are people of mahabharat mentioned in Tamil Sangam literature and buddhist Jatakas in sri lanka
@@adityaprushottam4873 demons are also mentioned in the sangam literature, your point sir?
@adityaprushottam4873 post colonial indian literature has numerous references to English culture, the people who colonised us, then?
PLEASE KEEP INDIA TOGETHER UNDER ONE SANATHAN DHARMA ,ALL LIVE TOGETHER AND PRESERVE OUR UNIQUE TREASURED CULTURE VEDIC SHASTRA
Y
I don't want vedha
No you are making religious conversion
I agree. Jai Sanatan Dharma! Jai Hind! 🇮🇳🙏
@@ryugaplays1934 Sanatan Dharma is NOT a religion. Go read & get your facts right.
He is an excellent speaker and author
My man is single-handedly uniting India and saving Indians from identity crisis by reminding them of their super-old culture and history.
Aryan word came from the Sanskrit word Arya, or cultivated people. According to Bal Gangadhar Tilak the Aryans had their origin in the Arctic Circle of Russia before the last Ice Age, before 27000 BC. At the time of the Ice Age they came to India, which was Ice free but they lost everything during the flood that followed after the Ice Age, possibly in 17000 BC. They developed new civilization in India. In about 6000 BC some of them, called themselves Asuras, went out of India and went to Iran, Iraq, Syria, Armenia and Russia, Ukraine, Bulgaria and Greece. There are Genetic evidence. These civilzations are related.
Western mainly the Anglo-American historians are propagating a false history that the Aryans came to India in 1500 BC. Thus, according to them all the characters of Ramayana and Mahabharatas are non-Aryans. Ramayana was about 9000BC and Mahabharata is about 7000 BC.
Reference:
Hall, HR ,1939, A Season of Work at Ur, Al-Ubaid, Abu Shahrain (Eridu) and Elsewhere:Being an Unofficial Account of the British Museum Archaeological Mission to Babylonia, London: Methuen
Oak, N., 2011, Mystery of Arundhuti, Atlanta: Danphe Inc.
Pravda, 2005, ‘Ancient Aryan civilization achieved incredible technological progress 40 centuries ago’, 16 July 2005
Tilak, Bal Gangadhara, 1903, The Arctic Home in the Vedas, Messrs. Tilak Brothers, Pune.
Guseva, N. R. 1995. Induism: Aryi, Slaviane. Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology.
Oak, N., 2011, When Did The Mahabharata War Happen?, Atlanta: Danphe Inc
Oak, N., 2014, The Historic Rama: Indian Civilization at the End of Pleistocene, Scotts Valley, California: CreateSpace.
Zharnikova, S. V. 1986. K voprosu o vozmozhnoi lokalizatsii sviashchennykh gor Meru i Khary indoiranskoi (ariiskoi) mifologii. Informatsionnyi bulleten’ Mezhdunarodnoi assotsiatsii po izucheniiu kul’tur Tsentral’noi Azii 11:31-44.
This old man is living in the British times with his Aryan Invasion Theory.
He seemed quite humble and open to the truth
Aryans, derived from the original Sanskrit word Arya, means cultivated educated person, according to Sri Aurobindo, used to have very high moral standard with great regard for truth, promise and hospitality. Their sages, or Rishis, after many years of meditations and learning, derived some great ideas or hymns(Riks) on God and universe.
Recent DNA evidence shows that Europe experienced a massive population influx from the east, beginning around 4,500 years from the present. Several haplo-groups were involved in this expansion, including the Indian-origin R1a1a. This was almost a total replacement event, which indicates that Indo-Aryans, among others, expanded westward into Europe and to a large extent replaced indigenous European males and their Y-chromosome strata (Sharma and his associates, 2009)
This genetic evidence indicates that several Y-chromosomal (patrilineal) lineages, one of which was the Indian-origin R1a1a, gave rise to the modern European population. Out of these lineages, R1a1a is the most widespread and numerous.
Recent DNA evidence shows that Europe experienced a massive population influx from the east, beginning around 4,500 years from the present. Several haplo-groups were involved in this expansion, including the Indian-origin R1a1a. This was almost a total replacement event, which indicates that Indo-Aryans, among others, expanded westward into Europe and to a large extent replaced indigenous European males and their Y-chromosome strata (Sharma and his associates, 2009)
This genetic evidence indicates that several Y-chromosomal (patrilineal) lineages, one of which was the Indian-origin R1a1a, gave rise to the modern European population. Out of these lineages, R1a1a is the most widespread and numerous.
It proves that:
1. The R1a haplogroup originated in India.
2. The Indo-Aryan people have lived in India for at least 15,450 years, which invalidates the theory that the Indo-Aryans invaded India 3,500 years ago.
3. The hundreds of millions of members (possibly over a billion) of the R1a family living across the world today - a very large fraction of humanity - are all descended from one single male ancestor who lived in India at least 15,450 years ago.
This discovery demonstrates the close genetic (and hence linguistic and cultural) affinity of Indians with the Russian and Polish people, the Vikings and Normans, and with the ancient Scythians and Tocharians, among many others (Sharma et al, 2009).
References:
Sharma S., 2009, The Indian origin of paternal haplogroup R1a1* substantiates the autochthonous origin of Brahmins and the caste system. Journal of Human Genetics, 54, 47-55
Sarker, A., A., Deshpande , A., Mukherjee, M. K., Bera,, B., Das, N., Juyal, P., Morthekai, R. D. , Deshpande, V. S., Shinde, V., & Rao, L. S., 2016, Oxygen isotope in archaeological bioapatites from India: Implications to climate change and decline of Bronze Age Harappan civilization, Nature, Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 26555.
Sanskrit is not oldest language...Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof.
1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C.
2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C
3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam
Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago..
This is the mainly Proof ..
India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable
1.) Tamizhi inscription
2.)Poly language inscription
3.)Ashoca inscription
4.)Devanagari inscription..
5.)SANSKRIT inscription
Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available..
Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams.
1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association.
Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD.
The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature.
Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu..
As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages..
Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
Aryans migrated from Central Asia over hundreds of years n brought along with them their culture and language. They slowly assimilated n incorporated pre vedic Gods into their belief structure.
J sai simply fantastic an erudite scholar
Thank you for your efforts to clarify the doubts
On asking... Who attacked India first??
Google answer.... Aryans attacked India first!!
How can we change this....
Lol...I hope your source is not Romila and Max Mullers arsehole.
You can't change facts dude. What happened 4000 years ago, happened. Accept it and move on. What is more important is next
Aryan never attack us this is propoganda by muller n macaulay for division in india so brits rule
And bharat original name is aryabharta jambudweep bharatkhand our bharat is huge and we rule 60%of land this world .. During chakrawarthi samrat vikram aditya n his evidence in turkey sher e okul ..
if u attack a land and stay there for more then 5000 years than it's ur land haha
Is the woman at 0:28 Rajmata of Mysore? 😱
Yes pleasantly surprised 😊👍Rajmatha Pramoda Deviji
कोई आर्यन और द्रविडियन में भेद नहीं है। हम सभी आर्य यानी श्रेष्ठ है। गर्व से कहो हम सब हिंदू हैं। जय श्री राम 🙏🙏🙏🚩🚩🚩🚩 हर हर महादेव 🙏🙏🙏🚩🚩🚩🚩
fucking invaders😂
Sanskrit is not oldest language.... Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof.
1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C.
2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C
3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam
Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago..
This is the mainly Proof ..
India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable
1.) Tamizhi inscription
2.)Poly language inscription
3.)Ashoca inscription
4.)Devanagari inscription..
5.)SANSKRIT inscription
Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available..
Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams.
1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association.
Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD.
The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature.
Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu..
As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages..
Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
Listened to the complete video, but did not understand how and at what part he destroyed Aryan invasion? Can anyone find it?
7:10 did he say Banglorification of Mysore. Ultimate 💥
Definition of Aadivasi point is be. Noted
thanks sai deepak ji... love you.. thanks
Dhannya ker diya Aap ney (J SD ) jaise Maa Swaraswati herself speaking Thank u Sir May God always bless you
If Aryan invitation theory is true then how Malayalam language become the most sanskritised language in the world and the highest forms of anciant hinduisam still we only see in the Malabar region in Kerala
South Indians has more south Asian hunter gatherers components DNA than Indo iranian
The Aryan invasion or any invasion is mistaken as an overnight act or a short term conquering activity beyond which "everything changed as per the conqueror". Its not an instant act or a change that happened overnight and for that matter its not even a deliberate act. When the matter is presented as a complaint like "they said India was invaded", then the resistance comes into place to disprove this theory - whereas this theory is concocted and misunderstood by many as the theory itself is also very loosely coupled. The invasion is a daily event - it happens even today. Today a north indian wearing a sweater in a moderate south indian winter can be looked upon as a "cultural invasion" whereas he or she is driven by habit or survival instinct out of a harsher northerly winter without any malintention!! We can see colonies of outsiders in any city/village and for that matter in a state/country - today when indians do it abroad, the Indian media celebrate it as "great diaspora moment". Back then as well Indians did it - Indians understand it as their pride though - but what Ashoka and Kanishka did were also invasions into south east asia. Back then, there were mostly display of survival instinct and power and very rarely greed - "if i dont excercise my power, somebody else would dethrone me, so i better do it" was the main motive back then apart from survival from hatsh climatic conditions. There were also cultural exchanges depicted as invasion today, which originally could be in search of good living conditions - naturally, in comparison to the extreme cold (Europe), dry and arid (Middle East, Africa) Indian peninsula might have been a compelling geography. Believe me, there wouldn't have been any other
motive - invading culture, religion etc is a very recent narration for the actual act of survivals done back then, when hunger, survival from harsh climate, health etc are taken care, these (invasion of my culture, my religion under threat etc) are just tools in an idle minds workshop!!!
CFBR
Why are these theories still taught in school
Hi SAI..
My name is Ravi Sunkara and I am writing this from USA.
Only recently I started watching your videos.
I wonder from where you got this gnanam, you are some what resembles Andi Shankar’s charya. We have similar thoughts like you but no knowledge to defend them like you do.
You are a great soul and came to this world for some purpose.
I wish our ways cross somewhere and I will get an opportunity to see you and talk to you.
I wish under you Our Sanathsna Dharma will regain its past glory.
OM NAMO VENKATESA
Andi shankar😳
@@rollings69😅
Sanskrit is not oldest language.. Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof.
1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C.
2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C
3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam
Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago..
This is the mainly Proof ..
India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable
1.) Tamizhi inscription
2.)Poly language inscription
3.)Ashoca inscription
4.)Devanagari inscription..
5.)SANSKRIT inscription
Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available..
Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams.
1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association.
Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD.
The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature.
Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu..
As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages..
Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
Brilliant question. These questions need to be kept on being asked, no matter what the generation.
This guy never answered the gentleman's question before the audience.
He shamelessly deviated from the point.
The comments section has also not questioned his behavior. This is breakdown of logic !
it is imp to clear the history first the lie of aryan dravidian theory made by invaders
Exactly that's what I observed, he never got the straight answer with proper explanation
"I got my facts from Google" 😆😆😆 Speaks the volume.
Google
Good, he was naive and honest in admitting his source.
@@nrupensingh7995 chad
Sanskrit is not oldest language...Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof.
1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C.
2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C
3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam
Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago..
This is the mainly Proof ..
India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable
1.) Tamizhi inscription
2.)Poly language inscription
3.)Ashoca inscription
4.)Devanagari inscription..
5.)SANSKRIT inscription
Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available..
Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams.
1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association.
Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD.
The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature.
Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu..
As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages..
Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
I read his book (the 1st section and the 1st chapter) nowhere has he mentioned the answer to the old man's question. He is just deflecting at that moment
6:57 Do you know how to respect river?
सत्य है🙏
This Old man is also believe that Dravidian and Aryan are also invaded in India
J Sai Deepak -Modern Day Gem of Bharat ❤❤❤❤
A perfect and graceful answer to the brown sepoys and left- inclined individuals who claim hinduism is a concoction to indian nationalists of the late 19 th century , and it is an amalgamation of various indigenous cultures , appropriated by Brahmins.
JSD every Hindu should learn from him
This man is great we are one family 👪 we are Hindus
If Aryan Invasion theory is wrong why did govt allowed in CBSE syllabus ?? Why universities allowed Aryan Invasion theory in syllabus? So Govt is right or Universities are right?
You mean congress government
@Kartik Shetty even now it is in syllabus I think...
You dont know it?
@@songs1093it's just a western propaganda bro, trying to divide India's diversity, if sanskrit is western language then why there isn't any 3000 yo proof outside India , also if Vedas were there then why do they embrace indian rivers and mountains , also it mentions aryavart which was ruled by native Indian kings during Mahabharata, like kaurav
@Shlokneils he is commie spamming everywhere
BHARAT mata ki jai Vanda Matram 🌹❣️
We are Dravidians in the Nation of Kannada
May the truth prevail
Okay, but where is the answer to those specific questions? As per the video title, he didn't agree with the Aryan invasion theory but then what is the history?
Listen to Nilesh Nilkanth Oak on TH-cam.
th-cam.com/video/ctH7SW0_TFA/w-d-xo.html
He says he addresses those specific question in the first section of his first book. (India that is Bharath).
AIT isn't actually AIT, it's AMT because when Aryans migrated, there were only traces of civilizations, but no real civilization present.
@@skull_bonet1 the Panchangams that we follow say Yudhishtira Sakam 4000+ years ago and Kaliyuga 5000+ years old. This history is right in front of our faces. We have Kamba Ramayanam (from south) and Ramcharitmanas from Tulsidas in the north - so everyone has always been here and as one. The Mahabharata says that Pandyas fought in the war - does our history books say that?
@@rajagopalan2411 we know that but sadly Aryan migration is still unclear in views of "science"
Sai Deepak ji has amazing and great knowledge and analysing capabilities. If he is taken into Modi Ji's team nation can be greatly benefited.
You get all sorts of stuff in Google. Cannot take information therein at face value. There should be further investigation always. Furthermore, writing to Google is a waste of time.
Only two books written by sd uptill now studied by me,I completely changed by my thought process, enlightened tremendously.debating with facts.searching authentic source.Recommend to study these books.
Bro where could I find these books broo plz I beg u❤
You don't need Google,come to JSD🔥🔥
Semi-albino Europeans can never be aryas
I loved Sai Deepak smile at the mention of Google
People started to clap right after the first statement of his reply which was "I disagree with your question fundamentally". It clearly says what the audience wants to hear which he continued. I don't know clearly about AIT but it's the advantage of choosing the audience smartly. So, you don't need to say the truth you need to say just what they want to hear.
He is a good speaker. In this speech, he just speaks like a politician by siting stories and not facts. And people love him for it. Because they just want to her stories. So, yeah he chooses his audience smartly, lol!
Guess you don't know what satire or sarcasm means. In just one statement he ridiculed the exaggeration in the question. So according to you the question was also based on stories and not facts. Also what do you mean by truth? History right? Then it the known by stories written by authors/historians. So you statement is just shows your ignorance.
@@bharatmirchi Just because I don't agree with this view, I'm ignorant? I don't know sarcasm..??
Sorry, there is no point in speaking to 4-year-olds who cannot distinguish facts from made-up stories. Shoo..go read Billoo or Akbar and Birbal!
@Vel A Triggered son? No one cares about your opinion. Everyone has the right to agree/disagree with the views of public speakers. But when you call views of well-educated and well-versed author a story, justify it with some facts..kid
Things doesn't work like that those who agree with you or belief same thing will be with you no matter what like if someone say earth is not flat people will say he is right even without thinking or referring to his argument because they share same beliefs labelling them as choosed audience would be incorrect so to speak
Always Hindhustan 😍😍😍
Deepak sai ji ki vichar Hindi mai bhi hone chahiye taki sabhi ko enke vicharo se avgat kraya ja ske
I will get the book and share it also with others.
I don't think SJD made any statement here, he went from Aryan invasion theory to medical mafia but didn't answer the question, 'who were the original habitats of current day India and how it changes whether interms of invasions or migrations? '
You can have answers in his first book "India that is Bharat"..
@@vamshi8694 May be but what's the point of the video?
@@photographymaniac2529 What is your problem with this video??? Are you supporter of the myth ????
@@vamshi8694 I only see a question but no answer given. But none seem to be identifying that
@@vamshi8694 these are same like those TV debates without any outcome/result
good discription and show how sanatan dharm are 🕉🚩
Aryan "invasion" might be the wrong word but aryans from steppe regions have migrated to india after the decline of IVC. Vedic period is basically their rise and expansion within north west india
तुम लोग कभी नहीं सुधरेगी
There is no evidence to prove this.
@@AnjelLee-f8c what do you consider as evidence?
😂@@AnjelLee-f8c
The kalpa vigraha is 28400 years old. How does that explain aryan invasion.
Bharat is blessed by jems like JSD❤❤❤
Don't ever use India as your natimal identity, use and be proud of the name Bharat❤❤
Please we need Tamil lecture
I assume when you say the Aryan Invasion theory is wrong , you must have compelling reasons to say so. Could you please provide references for
a. Facts that conclusively point to the Aryan theory being wrong
b. Facts that conclusively point to the alternate theory that you propose
Do you have evidence to the contrary??
U have any physical evidence to prove it right ?
It's just a western propaganda to keep their race superior
Invasion may be wrong but not migration. Aryan Migration is backed up by Genetics, Linguistics and Archeological research studies. The Rakhigarhi DNA report, sinauli excavation, Keeladi site findings, similarity of Sanskrit with other Indo European languages all prove Aryan migration. OIT is not at all supported by mainstream academia.
Aryan migration/invasion however you call it both of them happened simultaneously in harappa
History is so much complex even if you try to simplify it you can't!
The genetical evidence alone prove Aryan conquest of harappa
They brought Hinduism and created castism to oppress native Indians and keep their bloodline pure
Its out of India and it is proved!only these Aryans are not ready to support it🤣
They invaded in the name of culture.They introduced new gods and customs,rituals etc. Vedic culture spoiled India. Our forefathers could not get basic education because of vedic culture.Just do pooja and some customs show urself as pious and pure to the society.
Sanskrit is not oldest language... Indus civilization is Tamil civilization. Saraswathi river is fake. That time not Saraswati River.River Name sindhu River.Then This is Indian Tamil civilization..JOURNEY OF CIVILIZATION INDUS TO VAGAI BOOK IS MAIN PROOF ... Then i am also lot evidence available people speak to Mainly Tamil language only.. Why?..I have proof.
1.) TAMIL language total Number of inscription 67000 nos.. Then inscription age 700.B.C.
2.)SANSKRIT total inscription is 4500 only..Sanskrit INSCRIPTION is 100.B.C
3.)Sangam literature lot proof avaialable..Sangam Literature land wise People how survive lot poem available. Kurinji land - mountain land, Mullai land- Tree land, Marutham land -aggreculture land, Neythal land - sea land, Paalai land - Sesertland or Sand land or waste land,So land wise poem avaialable..Sangam
Litrature lot poem avaialable in desert land poems..Sangam Literature writing 2500 year ago..
This is the mainly Proof ..
India lot INSCRIPTION avaialable
1.) Tamizhi inscription
2.)Poly language inscription
3.)Ashoca inscription
4.)Devanagari inscription..
5.)SANSKRIT inscription
Then Tamil language world wide Lot of evidence is available. But Sanskrit evidence little bit only available..
Tamil Literature Sangam Literature Three Sangams wrote poems and developed the Tamil language. Names of those three Sangams.
1.)First Association 2.)Second Association 3.) Third Association.
Sangha literature is reorganized and written between 600 BC and 1300 AD. 1.) Poems of the First Sangam relate to events before 6000 BC. 2.) Poems of the Second Sangam relate to events which took place before 2500 BC. Says it like a song. 3.) The hymns of the Third Sangam relate events from 800 BC to 1200 AD.
The following are not mentioned in any literature in India. The following has been said in only one literature and that is Sangam literature only. Apartment buildings, Sewerage, Bricks, Forts, Education, Straight roads, Seals, What creatures were around the Indus Valley?, How many types of trees were around the Indus Valley?, What kind of clothes did the people of the Indus Valley wear?, What were their foods?, People of the Indus Valley Literature is one that can tell about daily life and many more things. It is Sangam literature.
Indus Valley has more than 2100 Sangam literary town names. These names date back to 5000 BC..the evidence is journey of civilization indus to vaigai book.latitude and longitude are given in this book..the names of this town are only in two areas. One is in Indus Valley in Pakistan and the other is in Tamil Nadu in India..Indus Valley has more Sanga Literary town names than Tamil Nadu..
As Tamil language is very ancient it has changed in every period. Tamil language has changed more than 15 times so its ancient form is not readable now. The alphabet of the Tamil language can be read twelve times, but its primitive form cannot be read. But the Aryans destroyed the source of it...Sanskrit was created by the Tamils themselves. The meaning of Sanskirudam is not even in Rigveda. That meaning is 'Samaikka patta kirudam '. If so, it is a 'Samaikka patta language'. English meaning is cooked language..Created with Tamil grammar and words from literature of many languages..
Everyone explores Indus Valley north and east of India there is no evidence there. But they don't want to explore south of India and places around Indian ocean..why India doesn't allow it..
The people in the comments are brainwashed. Let them be. Let them believe in this fake Indian superiority belief
In the long run, we will see how this Hindu supremacy negatively affects India. Then these people will understand and by then, it will be too late.
Wise people will run away from this nation in the near future, mark my words. The data doesn't lie, Lakhs of HNI's already gave up Indian citizenship
Interestingly the same people say North India protected South India from Invasions. If there is no invasion what did North India protect South from? Did North did not invade South?