How It's Made: Telescopes

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 163

  • @puppies.and.pumpkin
    @puppies.and.pumpkin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Perfect timing! I was just looking at the new images for the James Webb Telescope

    • @CTguy203
      @CTguy203 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think they did this intentionally

    • @kishascape
      @kishascape 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They knew what they were doing.

  • @Lesservector
    @Lesservector 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Wow, I can now understand as to why a good quality telescope costs so much. Never knew a liquid free electroplating process existed until today.

    • @rubiconnn
      @rubiconnn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's called physical vapor deposition or sputtering. Applied Sciences has a great video showing him making a device to do it.

    • @1.4142
      @1.4142 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The thought emporium has some good vids too

    • @jeremytheimer7443
      @jeremytheimer7443 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The grinding also takes a long time.

    • @mrbaab5932
      @mrbaab5932 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hard to electroplate insulators like glass. Conductors are what can be electroplated like metals.

    • @UncleKennysPlace
      @UncleKennysPlace 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rubiconnn If you mean the mirror coating, it's just evaporative, the simplest method. Sputtering is quite different.

  • @belken117
    @belken117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    That is a beautiful telescope! I had to google it's brand to find it, thank you for uploading this! But kinda wish you also included the tube and secondary mirror made.

    • @rickkearn7100
      @rickkearn7100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ed Ting would probably know, he has a telescope YT channel and is very knowledgeable.

    • @belken117
      @belken117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@rickkearn7100 Oh yes! Funny thing I've subscribed to his channel, he is indeed very knowledgeable on telescopes! ^^

    • @gruffcube
      @gruffcube ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@belken117 same

    • @mrbaab5932
      @mrbaab5932 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me too.

    • @tubedude54
      @tubedude54 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's Orion Optics in the UK

  • @nbaua3454
    @nbaua3454 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    That final step of electro-magnatic plating blew my mind.. that process should have a separate video for better explanation.
    I'm still wondering why the heck the person is not wearing any gloves during the manufacturing process. I didn't touched my new mobile screen for almost a week with bare hands and used the stylus to avoid stains on screen.

    • @UncleKennysPlace
      @UncleKennysPlace 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not electromagnetic at all. Simply vaporized metal condensing on the mirror.

  • @LTJC70
    @LTJC70 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hello all, I worked for Tele Vue Optics many years ago... We built refracting telescopes... Our scopes were built by hand and 1 at a time... If your interested in buying a telescope I encourage you to look up Tele Vue Optics... Back when I built them they were top of the line and I'm sure they have only gotten better!!

    • @w3vjp568
      @w3vjp568 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a TeleVue Genesis-SDF, beautiful scope. I just wish the lens cell was user-adjustable!

    • @filcuk
      @filcuk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why is the mirror glass shown here so thick?

    • @ShubhamRaj-mu8ol
      @ShubhamRaj-mu8ol ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@filcuk pressure due to mounting equipment, gravity and temperature changes can deform the mirror shape, and in telescope even fractions of a millimeter of change can make huge difference. The thick glass is more resistant to deformiities.

    • @skysurfer5cva
      @skysurfer5cva ปีที่แล้ว

      I have four Tele Vue eyepieces (8-mm Delos, 13-mm Ethos, 27-mm Panoptic, and 41-mm Panoptic). All four are outstanding. I use them with my Celestron C-5+, Celestron CPC-800, and Celestron CPC-1100HD. I once put the $600 Ethos on my $50 75-mm Celestron FirstScope (Galileo Anniversary Edition, which I bought to decorate my home office). The combo actually worked, even though it is impractical. 🙂

    • @k.h.1587
      @k.h.1587 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had a televue 101 and a televue pronto. I had had many televue eyepieces over the years. I had everything stolen in 2018 and had to start over on a shoestring. No more televue refractors, 31 nagler or type 6 naglers and powemates, but I do have a televue paracorr, and old original smoothside 7mm nagler and 32mm plossl. Much less televue than I used to own. I have mostly older meade series 4000 ultrawide eyepieces, older meade series 4000 super plossls, and more modern but excellently executed Chinese clones of the type 5 nagler (28mm UWAN type 82deg) and ethos (20mm XWA), and a couple vixen LVWs and the 24mm explore scientific clone of the 24mm televue panoptic. I previously owned 4 of the meade 5000 swa versions of the same eyepiece, 24, 28 34 and 40mm.
      But the wide field view of the 31mm nagler in the televue 101 wide field flat field refractor was just insane in dark skies. If I could kill anyone with my bare hands and get away with it, it would be the tweakers that broke into my storage and took it all from me. And they got SO much more than that.

  • @greatPretender79
    @greatPretender79 2 ปีที่แล้ว +185

    Alternate title: How It's Made: telescope mirrors

    • @dougaltolan3017
      @dougaltolan3017 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      As far as making mirrors go, that was barely scratching the surface (pun intended)

    • @dickJohnsonpeter
      @dickJohnsonpeter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AND DRANGULS! ()

    • @nickd3871
      @nickd3871 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That is the primary component of a telescope. That is "How it works".

    • @corncobjohnsonreal
      @corncobjohnsonreal ปีที่แล้ว +2

      New how it's made sucks. They're all like this now

    • @1islam1
      @1islam1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dougaltolan3017⚠️ God has said in the Quran:
      🔵 { O mankind, worship your Lord, who created you and those before you, that you may become righteous - ( 2:21 )
      🔴 [He] who made for you the earth a bed [spread out] and the sky a ceiling and sent down from the sky, rain and brought forth thereby fruits as provision for you. So do not attribute to Allah equals while you know [that there is nothing similar to Him]. ( 2:22 )
      🔵 And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful. ( 2:23 )
      🔴 But if you do not - and you will never be able to - then fear the Fire, whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the disbelievers.( 2:24 )
      🔵 And give good tidings to those who believe and do righteous deeds that they will have gardens [in Paradise] beneath which rivers flow. Whenever they are provided with a provision of fruit therefrom, they will say, "This is what we were provided with before." And it is given to them in likeness. And they will have therein purified spouses, and they will abide therein eternally. ( 2:25 )
      ⚠️ Quran

  • @noreaction1
    @noreaction1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Can you make a video on how optics are made? For example what techniques go into making optics quality glass, and what considerations and calculations are taken for grinding techniques etc.

    • @elnogga
      @elnogga 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      they have. watch?v=xfhjWyAU9Cw

    • @SevroAuBarca04
      @SevroAuBarca04 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You should check out Hyugen Optics’ channel he has awesome videos about the subject!

    • @dougaltolan3017
      @dougaltolan3017 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SevroAuBarca04 Exactly what I was going to post. 👍

    • @customFunctions
      @customFunctions 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They did, it’s in season 8 ep 4

    • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SevroAuBarca04 absolutely!

  • @alexandersaquapark7090
    @alexandersaquapark7090 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very Beautiful.

  • @TheSquirrel_gaming
    @TheSquirrel_gaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very interesting thanks

  • @topgear3487
    @topgear3487 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    How It's Made is the best show on Science Channel :D

  • @BLUELEADER78
    @BLUELEADER78 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If you have never used a telescope, it's definitely something you should look into.

  • @EverClayGuy
    @EverClayGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Orang yang gagal akan nampak kesusahan pada setiap peluang, manakala orang yang optimis akan nampak peluang dalam setiap kesusahan

  • @themechbuilder6171
    @themechbuilder6171 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    its a beautiful telescope! i checked its branding only to find the hefty price it comes with.. i'm pretty sure it is worth it if you have astronomy and photography as your career

  • @brianduarte6045
    @brianduarte6045 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Poptropica is where my fascination for telescopes began.

  • @anon7945
    @anon7945 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Finally!

  • @kickinitwithmydawg
    @kickinitwithmydawg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I would think the workers' hands would be gloved...or at least clean when assembling

  • @andromedach
    @andromedach 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    over 4k euro, approaching 6k for some models...
    saving everyone some time

    • @davidjacobs8558
      @davidjacobs8558 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can afford that, but I live in a city with bad light pollution.
      I can't afford to go to remote area where there is no light pollution.
      therefore, it would not be a wise investment.

    • @cstalt
      @cstalt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davidjacobs8558 Makes sense given all those parts are machined from blanks. Material cost alone is enormous.

  • @tonyrowland9216
    @tonyrowland9216 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Never ever saw a worker touch even the raw mirror WITOUT GLOVES ON! Must have been a demo with a bad mirror. Best way ever to be shown the exit.

  • @void_presence
    @void_presence 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    to be clear, this is for a Cassegraine-type reflecting telescope; i'd say most reflecting telescopes are of the Newtonian type, which has the secondary mirror bounce the light off to a side hole in the tube (rather than back down the tube) which is where the focuser/eyepiece is.

  • @arupsarkar3345
    @arupsarkar3345 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It is believed by west in Bharat we always knew tht sun we revolve around.❤❤

  • @geraldmarfoe348
    @geraldmarfoe348 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is a catadioptric telescope (probably a Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope or a Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope).

    • @davidjacobs8558
      @davidjacobs8558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it has spokes, not Maksutov.

    • @rodenreyes6320
      @rodenreyes6320 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Classical Cassegrain maybe.

    • @nihar1987
      @nihar1987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is the Orion ODK 10, a 10 inch Optimised Dall - Kirkham astrograph. Which itself is an improved version of a Ritchey Chretien telescope. It's nether a Cassegrain not a Maksutov.

    • @dougaltolan3017
      @dougaltolan3017 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nihar1987 👍 I hadn't bothered looking up the company featured here...
      But my mirrors from 11" Celestron SCT are with them right now being recoated....

  • @jameslabs1
    @jameslabs1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool. Thanks

  • @seniormahamed7481
    @seniormahamed7481 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome

  • @karthikraj550
    @karthikraj550 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks

  • @MakoRuu
    @MakoRuu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Man, I wish I could afford a nice telescope.

    • @Capadapp
      @Capadapp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you can

    • @Capadapp
      @Capadapp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      its like under 200 for a great image

    • @jeremytheimer7443
      @jeremytheimer7443 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Capadapp be careful with under 200 dollars. you can get some great ones but that is the price where hobby killers prevail.

    • @Capadapp
      @Capadapp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jeremytheimer7443 celestron dobsonian, it was my first

    • @gruffcube
      @gruffcube ปีที่แล้ว

      Just don't get a powerseeker. I recommend something from the Skywatcher heritage series.

  • @muneebmuhamed43
    @muneebmuhamed43 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You did well by timing this with the official release of the First pics from James Webb

  • @tontan1998
    @tontan1998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow

  • @oldschoolfoil2365
    @oldschoolfoil2365 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    that big fingerprint on the mirrors surface during assembly is a new constellation

  • @msc73
    @msc73 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had one of that

  • @onestepbeyond5221
    @onestepbeyond5221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting 😃

  • @Heworldwide
    @Heworldwide 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just to think how previous telescopes were made without this technology

    • @BoogsMcNoogs
      @BoogsMcNoogs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, badly, those were the days!

    • @dougaltolan3017
      @dougaltolan3017 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ever since lenses and mirrors were ground by hand, the only improvement has been the bearings on the grinders.

  • @13thravenpurple94
    @13thravenpurple94 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Greeeeat work 🥳 Thank you 💜

  • @jackspicer455
    @jackspicer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So cool!

  • @luisito6314
    @luisito6314 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good one

  • @PankajSingh-sg7ij
    @PankajSingh-sg7ij ปีที่แล้ว

    Everything is good but you don't know, in India we know for more than thousands of years that sun is the center of planet system. In Indian system, 9 planets rotate around the sun.

  • @artemisnecrosis1094
    @artemisnecrosis1094 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its not that half the telescope production is missing that annoys me. It that fact the worker isn't wearing gloves of any kind.

  • @Bballer252007
    @Bballer252007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    20 mins ago I decided to look into purchasing a telescope, and then this came up.

    • @-never-gonna-give-you-up-
      @-never-gonna-give-you-up- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Don't go cheap cuz you will be disappointed

    • @luchvk
      @luchvk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My experience is consistent with PB's statement. Though, I haven't used a nice telescope before.

    • @-never-gonna-give-you-up-
      @-never-gonna-give-you-up- 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@luchvk I used to have a telescope to try it out, but it was my first one, after looking at all the amazing pictures you can make with a telescope people often forget 90% of those amazing pictures are made with an expensive and known brand telescope. What happens is, people buy a telescope thinking it's expensive enough, only to end up not seeing anything at the level they were hoping to see.

    • @luchvk
      @luchvk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@-never-gonna-give-you-up- I saw a whole lot of nothing. The one I looked through (a while ago at this point) was DOA. That's something that can happen when you don't get something at least decent in quality.

    • @Bballer252007
      @Bballer252007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was thinking it was going to be about $2,000. I still haven’t had time to research 🔬, but I live on 9 acres lakeside boxed in by the woods and there’s a gully on the lakeside that I assume would make fantastic natural viewing spot.
      A quick Google search is pointing me towards Celestron, but I need to do more research before dropping $2k.

  • @rgbii2
    @rgbii2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Pretty interesting, though I don't think this is how they made my $110 celestron. :)

  • @kimbratton9620
    @kimbratton9620 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love 🔭!

  • @k.h.1587
    @k.h.1587 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im guessing that is a corrected dahl kirkham or ritchey chretien design?

  • @tomb7704
    @tomb7704 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Their CNC lathe operator needs to have a word with them self

    • @biffaplayz
      @biffaplayz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That birds nest on the boring bar was to help polish the poor surface finish

  • @Heworldwide
    @Heworldwide 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love it

  • @xvi811
    @xvi811 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    hi

    • @xvi811
      @xvi811 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      good comment

    • @xvi811
      @xvi811 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      1

  • @solidzeng
    @solidzeng 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't understand why a mirror with a hole in the middle can be a telescope

    • @serpent77
      @serpent77 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Basically the primary mirror (the one with the hole) collects light and through it's curved surface reflects and focuses the light on the secondary mirror at the front of the telescope (the mirror they kind of glossed over in the video) that also has a curve to focus the light down to the hole in the primary mirror to the viewer/camera/etc. The light kind of makes an "N" path from the right side and following it all around the telescope body.

    • @2Fast4Mellow
      @2Fast4Mellow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A telescope works similar to a satellite dish. The large outer disc reflects that light back to the small receiver in the middle facing the disc.
      Using the knobs you change the distance between the outer and inner disc in the same way you can focus the beam of a magnify class on a piece of paper.
      In the 'ol days you had these film/photo projectors that put a light behind a film and the image was projected on a mirror, than the image of the mirror was reflected on a canvas (or wall). Because of this reflection photo's are shown upside down...

    • @John_Ridley
      @John_Ridley 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The area where the hole is wouldn't collect any light anyway, it's in the shadow of the secondary mirror. Keep in mind this is only one of dozens of different styles of scopes. Since they didn't mention a front corrector plate and it has a spider secondary, I'm assuming this is a classical cassegrain or similar. They're actually not very common. The most common types are newtonian, Schmidt-Cassegrain, refractors and Maksukov-Cassegrain, probably in that order.

  • @Paladin_of_Justice
    @Paladin_of_Justice 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I've wished to have a telescope my whole life. That one would be "out if this world"... someday I hope.

    • @Paladin_of_Justice
      @Paladin_of_Justice 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@meok2 yep I agree I'm 52 and putting one son so far through college my wife I put through college I. I have another son five years out from college.
      I never went to college I went to fight a couple of conflicts and one war.

    • @davidjacobs8558
      @davidjacobs8558 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      telescopes are useless, unless you go to some remote area where there is no light pollution.
      if you live near cities, you won't see much with telescopes.

    • @Paladin_of_Justice
      @Paladin_of_Justice 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davidjacobs8558 the nearest town to me is 40 miles it's population is 1,100 the next city is around 60 miles with a population of 25,000 . My elevation where I go is 4500 ft. It's crystal clear not a sound and 0 pollution.

    • @Hot-Dog-Racing
      @Hot-Dog-Racing ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They’re not that expensive! You can have a decent astrophotography setup for less than $500, or even less if you buy used. It’s amazing how cheap apochromatic refractor or Newtonian reflector telescopes are nowadays considering how good they are. Heck, an 8” dobsonian is like $250 used and they’re powerful enough to easily see the rings of Saturn.

    • @maximus9812
      @maximus9812 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidjacobs8558Absolutely not true. You can get great views of the moon, planets, binary stars, etc. even with heavy light pollution.

  • @greatPretender79
    @greatPretender79 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also as a machinist, 0:45 gave me diabetes

  • @milesparris4045
    @milesparris4045 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Light years" are a measure of distance.

    • @AdvanceAU
      @AdvanceAU 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you, Captain Obvious.

  • @Cristianoo-y2r
    @Cristianoo-y2r 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    hi 😮

  • @zlol_ssbm
    @zlol_ssbm หลายเดือนก่อน

    Granted that optician seems quite skilled; but I still can’t believe he’s not wearing gloves lol

  • @qzorn4440
    @qzorn4440 ปีที่แล้ว

    magically wonderful while spooky, as the primary mirror surface is exposed to all kinds of dirt. 😎 Thank you.

  • @brendakrieger7000
    @brendakrieger7000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fascinating🔭🌌

  • @hcic9860
    @hcic9860 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Go Birds!!! 🦅

  • @shimonigmagames
    @shimonigmagames 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now I know

  • @rosetodaro5081
    @rosetodaro5081 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was made all wrong. Where the cardboard tube? Where the rubber bands? Where’s the gold star stickers? This thing will never work!

  • @niranpunnz9039
    @niranpunnz9039 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How microscope ❤️👍

  • @isisheggs8065
    @isisheggs8065 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a nice telescope I wonder how much it costs

  • @nopeyadayadayada1248
    @nopeyadayadayada1248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    At 4:38 you can see the lint, hairs and other FOD on the mirrors surface. A semblance of a clean environment when assembling them goes a long way.

    • @jtorola
      @jtorola 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's not FOD.
      FOD stands for foreign object damage and that is not applicable here.
      For assembly you don't need a clean room as long as you use gloves and proper post assembly cleaning.
      Especially for this level of telescope

    • @nopeyadayadayada1248
      @nopeyadayadayada1248 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jtorola FOD stands for foreign object debris.

  • @8Junio76
    @8Junio76 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much is the cost of that telescope?

  • @anonymously241
    @anonymously241 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How much scope cost? 🔭

    • @John_Ridley
      @John_Ridley 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As with any hobby, you can basically spend any amount you want. The scope in this video is pretty darned high end. Just off the top of my head I'd expect it's > $10,000 US. You can get a very nice scope for $500 to $1000 though. "Dobsonian" style scopes are the best value for money. Keep in mind though that good eyepieces are also needed and can double the price.

    • @anonymously241
      @anonymously241 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@John_Ridley thanks for the info brother 🙏🙏☺️

    • @rodenreyes6320
      @rodenreyes6320 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just get a good 4" refractor and use at both nightsky and terrestrial viewing.Heavenly bodies at night and "heavenly" bodies at the beach.

  • @melchristian8876
    @melchristian8876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍👍👍👍

  • @perseoeridano4182
    @perseoeridano4182 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👏🏻👏🏻

  • @aminkhandrishak6045
    @aminkhandrishak6045 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ♥️

  • @Chinhnguyen0497
    @Chinhnguyen0497 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    damn. telescope is something I don't affordable

  • @elevate32767
    @elevate32767 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:43 disturbing.

  • @sandibracko4175
    @sandibracko4175 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    and photo is stil analog with film winder ;-)

  • @IIIRotor
    @IIIRotor 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    was Galileo a Dutchman?

  • @IIGrayfoxII
    @IIGrayfoxII 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are they not wearing gloves when handling the mirror?

  • @stevenjones2371
    @stevenjones2371 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thats a very expensive one

  • @jasonrogers1576
    @jasonrogers1576 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol It was known LONG before 400 years ago that the Earth isn't flat and that everything doesn't revolve around it..

  • @spiritualacts6357
    @spiritualacts6357 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    kool

  • @spiritualacts6357
    @spiritualacts6357 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    so stars are just lights are could it be more then

  • @RikuWRLD
    @RikuWRLD 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    “I always wondered how they were made”

  • @alexdelara9858
    @alexdelara9858 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    2022: £3,625.00 excl. VAT ouch....

  • @alexandersaquapark7090
    @alexandersaquapark7090 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    У меня есть Вкусная Рыба заходи. 🐟🐠🐡🐬🦈

  • @beb38138
    @beb38138 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How It's Made ...James Webb Telescope??

  • @jerrleuu
    @jerrleuu 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    how can anyone teletransport from one planet to another at a further galaxy I mean only God can do that since he's invincible, there's a lot of obstruction on the way, stars would burn you, on the other side I don't know how telescope can pass through the stars without planets or stars blocking its view.

  • @ferretyluv
    @ferretyluv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not show the secondary mirror being built instead of the testing? That would be more impressive.

  • @sandhillpreppers
    @sandhillpreppers 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just bought my first telescope, I put together, but I'm not sure what I did wrong because a can't see thru it 🤔

    • @menard518
      @menard518 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      which telescope?

    • @sandhillpreppers
      @sandhillpreppers 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@menard518 ASTRONOMICAL TELESCOPE, ESSLNB...

    • @menard518
      @menard518 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sandhillpreppers i looked it up and idk which one specifically ur talking about, but the ones i saw are under 100, so your better off just using your eyes or binoculars until you can get something better

  • @hinz1
    @hinz1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    £3,625.00 excl. VAT ;-D

  • @fernandogutierrez470
    @fernandogutierrez470 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    They didn't use globes 😥

    • @davidjacobs8558
      @davidjacobs8558 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I saw a video of Canon factory, where they assemble one of their large zoom lenses (like 1000mm size),
      and the factory workers did not wear globes when they assemble those lenses either.

  • @russchadwell
    @russchadwell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Opening music change. For the fail.

  • @mblaber2000
    @mblaber2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This dude should be wearing gloves...

  • @omnom2455
    @omnom2455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🇵🇸

  • @princeindrajitlawlaha7027
    @princeindrajitlawlaha7027 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ! 💝 💯 👏 🎉 🙏 🚀 👍 🤖 🎅 ✝ 🌝 !

  • @wladimirbetcher
    @wladimirbetcher ปีที่แล้ว

    expensive junk

  • @trident8872
    @trident8872 ปีที่แล้ว

    ALSI MAKE A VIDEO HOW SPOTTING SCOPES ARE MADE

  • @iiiiii-w8h
    @iiiiii-w8h 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why tf does a telescope need three cooling fans? are you overclocking it?

    • @astroinfinland6680
      @astroinfinland6680 ปีที่แล้ว

      It need to cool down to get the sharpest images.

    • @maximus9812
      @maximus9812 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Differences in temperature between the inside and outside of the scope cause air currents that distort the image. So you want the scope to cool to ambient temperature before use. Closed tube scopes like the one in the video take longer to cool, so the fans help.

  • @HOOBANGTV
    @HOOBANGTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    갖고싶당..