ShastarVidiya India Katar and Axe
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024
- Here Gurdev Nidar Singh Nihang demonstrates using the Indian Axe and Katar during the 2 day seminar in Italy. For further information about seminars please visit www.shastarvidiya.org or find us on Facebook. Sanatan ShastarVidiya
This makes me interested in seeing a sihk warrior faction in for honor i think itd be sick
He. Is. Not a sikh actuaaly he is a sick agent of anti sikh agrncies
@@shiv9505 Whatever he is.... He admits Sikhi is part of Hinduism
I'm telling you. This is amazing. I've never seen these weapons used together. I've always seen the character baldo from soul calibur use a katar.. and now that they've incorporated more of an Indian theme to rain from mortal Kombat 11 and added the katar as his weapon... I like that it's getting more exposure this is an incredible weapon
Waheguru ji
Yug yug jio ji khalsa ji jio very nice ji Waheguru ji tuhanu Chardikala ch rakhan jio ji
Who else is here from skallagrim?
He makes it look so easy its like an artform.
it is called a martial art for a reason
The guy with the sword, was he really fighting?
BABA G tuci great ho .
1:21 why does the guy with the sword try to hit the guy with the turban with the pummel of the sword?
The pummel has a sharp spike on it which is crucial in close quater combat
@@gurmeharsingh5228 that was not a serious question. what that dude does is pointless. the sabre-guy does not even try to attack but steers his arm into the block on purpose. wrestling is more believable.
@@FlyingTurtleLP u still can't wrestle an armed guy, and he wasn't attacking him with pummel,
@Arjun Ishika Jamwall What has been shown is just ridiculous. Dude with a huge ass scimitar swings his arm with the blade towards himself into his opponents weapon.
Absolutely loving all these armchair blademasters in the comments xD
thank you. I always think it's under-appreciated how much more difficult it is mastering the blade while in an armchair
Incredible, jai ho,
These slow motion samples don't work in real fight.
in a real fight you'd just pivot and hit his head.
Alot of these slow movements look like Aikido except done with weapons.
You teach in slow motion so people can see
@@garynaccarto8636 Aikido has weapons...
in a real fight you haven't a katar blade or an axe
Awesome
Thank you
this happens just because who use the sword doesn't stay at correct distance, without a shield in a true combat the BALLS that you are able to do this...
They actually did use these and managed to win battle while being heavily outnumbered
वाह
Nice technique looks cool, but in a real fight none would be this willing and the axe hand is in danger for getting cut all the time. A real fight against someone with a sword that is much longer than the reach of the katar+axe would favor the sword much more. A proper fighter wouldn't get that close that his hand could be hooked like that.
Then all the dagger fighting techniqies against a sword are useless too
Gurdev ji Hindi 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Best video 👌
The real name of Katar is "Kidaari" is from the ancient Tamil warfare class of weapons. Kidaari derived from the term "Kedayam Ari" meaning the "Shield Splitter" in Tamil. The name indicates this weapon being used to break shields and armor. The weapon was used by many ethnic Tamil infantry units aka "Kaalatpadai". This falls under the "mushtikai" class of Indian weapon system. "Mushti" means the fingers closed and "kai" means arm.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katar_(dagger)
Deadly
Bullshido.
th-cam.com/video/Pkdw7I812Hg/w-d-xo.html
Deadly!For the person who actually tries to use that stuff in a real fight.
Nidar singh ji apna personal number send kro
Why don't you teach in India too or atleast have seminars.
Sanatan shastarvidiya india - Facebook.
Seminars in Delhi and other parts.
Sardar Ki Parshuram was human not avtar avratr hota hi nahi
Assiliant must be provided with shield along with sword to test the battle effectiveness of these weapons.
Dude in all historical battles axes are useful for armed fights even some time axe break shields , swords cuts very cleanly but axe break bones & cuts unevenly because of its weight & shape that is more painful for human body
Jinanu tusi sikha rha ho alog sikh nu he marn ga
The sword attacks are ridiculous. Only the worst kind of amature would come in swinging like that, they'd come in point first and thrust and use the length advantage of their weapon, not wind up like they were hoping for a home run. I could see blocking with the katar and then attempting to bind the weapon or the attacker's arm but come on.
Indian swords are built for slashing not stabbing notice the curve buddy
Still they'd probably hold it in a stance that makes slashes a little less telegraphed
Yes they do come in point first, however, the man with axe steps aside and uses axe to break the attack and subdue the opponenet. Moreover, if you are coming with the sword pointed in first then you will become to predictable and loose very quickly.
hehehe
I am pretty sure in reality no one fights like this .
Baba ji bidya sirf singh nu sikho
sorry to bust your bubble but this nalaik has agreed and taken money to teach shastr vidhiya to RSS shakas in India , if he was a real nihang he wouldn't arm the enemy of sikhs , he is just a ghadar
@@jasbirkaurvillaschi8019 darpoka kolo tan v kuch ni hona nale eho jahe nu ki aanda bas kuttay khani te kutta khutay khani i sikhuga aggay v
Brother I'm a muslim and i read all history of guru gobind singh ji . guru ji liv in bihar then who teaching him shaster vidhya . sorry if i hurt you . b'coz i read different in Sikhism but you peoples not like what i read i feel it when i meer some sikhs in india and out of india they always hate speech abut hindu and muslim
He is RSS agent , he is specifically training RSS in India and accepting funding from them.
That’s Khalsa Shastra Vidya not Sanatan Shastra Vidya
Satsriakal sardar ji I'm a muslim and read abut guru gobind singh ji life they're living in bihar I'm right ?? And who's teaching guru ji shaster vidhya you know the name of teacher ?? Sorry my English is little bad but . jo meine read kia hai Sikhism ke bary mein sikh log wese nahi hain . mein Amritsar mein raha hu mujhy nahi pata ap log kyun hate karty ho apni he mulq ko . islam mein apny mulq se pyar karna sikhaya sab se pehly fir majhab ki bari ati hai .
This Niddar guy is RSS agent , many videos of this are available , calls it “ Santana Hindu Sikh Vediyea” and tries to connect Shiva with Guru Gobind Singh ji.
Than why sikhs learnt it from rajputs
A thing to realize with unarmored demonstrations like this, especially using weapons, even blunted ones, is that in order to perform it safely, it has to be exaggerated and choreographed. because if you succeeded in controlling someone using a hatchet, you've probably mauled their arm a good bit in the process.
That said, there are two relevant points: One. It doesn't look like the swordsman is used to swinging a live blade at a person. He shows no confidence in his ability to control his sword. Two. Some of these techniques look a bit suspect. How much of that is from the poor showing of the swordsman and the exaggerated nature of any weapon demonstration is debatable. But to be honest, it's nothing you wouldn't find in any combat skill turned martial art. Once the skills become divorced from the circumstances that birthed them, they are all prone to developing fatal flaws.
This demonstration is as useful as those self defense lessons by fake guru's.
The only legit move was the one where he blocked the wrist.. but you don't need 2 weapons to chop of the hand... this simply wouldn't happen , because nobody who trains in sword arts is stupid enough to lead with the body against a cold weapon.
There are 2 problems with dual wielding.
1. it's not that practical the weapons get in the way , dual wielders needed to be extremely skilled or know EXACTLY what they were doing.
2. The weapons are too small any longer sword with a bit of power behind it would cause serious damage here.
Sprunkers Incorrect, a dual weilder is your worst nightmare when you have a long heavy weapon, only thing, maybe an epee or rapier could get around this guy, but having short weapons he has much more leverage and speed.
@@MrDrakePrice lol u must be joking. Two handed weapon is not only longer more powerfull but also does not suffer any significant speed penalty contrary to popular belief out 100 battles dual wield looses 90 times. Dual wield cannot receive heavy blows properly nor can it get in range of Average 2 handed. After a few blows from a two hander your hands would suffer or youd outright drop the weapon, youre much better of going hybris 1.5 hand and 1 hand style. Moreover the shield and shwort sword combo does everything better than dualwield. Most short swords can be used like the rapier to stab at the visor before dual can even think about the next move.
Explain Rapier and dagger then? Or side sword or dagger. Or even backsword and dagger. The technique demonstrated here can be used with all these sited european combinations. In fact, we have some similar to them. The problem I see in this video is more in the attacker that is over gentle to the demonstrator. But the core of the thechnique shown is quite solid.
And you probably haven't ever heard of "parata in croce" or "tutta coperta". And these are just the italian terms.
The reason for this is poor armor early stages of Renaissance , with the invention of gunpowder armor went out of fashion in favor of mobility. Heavy armor did not protect against matchlocks and cannons. Spanish especially found these types of weapons favorable due to the naval conquest, which promoted swift unarmored raids and duels.
I guess I'm talking about completely different time period eg 1300's to 1600's
@@Jaime_Protein_Cannister I see where you are coming from. But you have to understand that in the renaissance, longswords also existed. I fought a longsword with rapier and dagger and rapier alone. Rapier and dagger is basically op against a longsword.
Fake. if you wish to spread your own style of marital arts and teachings stop using the Sikhs bana and turban to get publicity. You want to put your own "twist" to it go name it something else and stop wearing what you wear as if it is a costume. I hope this message doesn't anger you but instead stops your false parchar.
Lally Singh how do u know this is false prachar?
who gives u the authority to dictate people what to wear and what to teach? dont be a fanatic
Hanu- man it's not about me having authority. What he is wearing is not just a regular "outfit" it is held to a certain standard and is a sort of uniform. Just as how if you're not a police men you shouldn't be walking around in a police uniform and saying things, to the public eye all they know is that he is an officer and whatever he says must be true. That is what this man is doing right here wearing a uniform and people that don't know much history or know any better believe him because of what he's wearing and how he looks. If you don't believe me, believe him lol. There's a video of him apologizing to the real Nihangs in india and saying sorry for spreading false Sikhi because the real Nihangs approached him about it peacefully, but yet after that apology he goes back to UK and continued ...
wearing blue garb and turban has nothing to do with sikhism. naga yogis wore it since the last 1000 years imitating shiva. look for the battles fought by babur and akbar where naga sadhus fought against them.
imitating a police officer is an offence because it has to do with state security and state authority.
dont tell me because you bought a red t-shirt and blue pants, i cant wear the same.anyone can wear what he /she wants.I can teach u the history of akalis since the time of govind singh btw.
i have seen the video of him apologizing in darbar sahib, he did it to protect himself from fanatic sikhs who do not have the balls to hear criticism and introspect.
the gurus told you to open your eyes and be rational and look how irrational and fanatic you have been. you beat guys for cutting beard, you threaten people for haveing pags with peacock feathers and you call names to people for wearing blue chola.
shame on you, you make the gurus and their message a shame. you and people like u o not have the right to call yourselves sikh.
dastar and beard doesnot make someone sikh, understanding the message of equality, freedom and respect for other peoples/views/lifestyles does.
Hanu- man what are you talking about? I have no idea what you're saying but like I mentioned before what he is wearing and how he is presenting it is as a bana of the Nihangs Singhs he calls himself a Nihang so right there he is claiming to be something he's not and of course you would say the real Nihangs in the video were being crazy and he was scared for his life lol have you even seen the video they told him nicely what he was doing was wrong and he agreed ... and another point if he was a true "Nihang" he wouldn't be scared for his life to say and do what he believes but instead he apologizes acknowledging he's wrong. You're not getting my point you keep thinking I'm telling him or you what to wear that's not the case. And the whole first paragraph you wrote is irrelevant to this man he is obviously wearing as a representation of the Nihang sikhs he calls himself a Nihang ...
Let me get this straight, who the f is going to stand there and let you hit them?