Why are the Best TVs in 2021 So Bad for the Environment?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @r3b0rn80
    @r3b0rn80 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I had a 42 plasma tv from Panasonic (one the first models that came out at that time).
    Using a wattmeter, I realized that thing sucked 300W !
    Now I use a TCL 55 inch that only draws 50W and between 17W and 20W if lower the brightness. Not sure I can find something better for that size.

  • @a1white
    @a1white 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Doing the same search again, on AO in 2024 and there are now 9 F and 1 E (and 13 G) rated OLED TVs, so it would seem they are starting to get more efficient

  • @DragonBlueSpirit
    @DragonBlueSpirit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The C2 (also 55" version) dropped down to 81 kWh/1000h and the newer version for next year is expected to go even below that.. truly amazing how much things change in a couple of years

  • @Ourbluecats
    @Ourbluecats 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’ve been looking every where for a good explanation of kWh/1000h and finally a explanation that makes sense! Thanks a really informative video.

    • @lovemadeinjapan
      @lovemadeinjapan ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is just a very complicated way to say Watt. 1kWh=1000*1*3600=3600000 J. So if you divide it through 1000h, which is 3600000s, the result is 1J/s, or 1W!

    • @HiltTilt
      @HiltTilt ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@lovemadeinjapan This is much more precise, then just saying Watt in terms time usage.

    • @xfghffhfg
      @xfghffhfg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@HiltTilt its actully the exact same

  • @lovemadeinjapan
    @lovemadeinjapan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My 21 inch CRT consumes 35W and was on like 300 hours a year, basically using like 10kWh. My 32 inch FullHD Bravia was on 2 hours a day, and it uses 75W, so that is 55kWh. These OLED TV's do like 100W and run for 3-4 hours a day, that is 127kWh. My CRT deserves a A-label posthumously.

    • @HiltTilt
      @HiltTilt ปีที่แล้ว

      You have to consider the size and resolution differences in the TVs too. Bigger Higher res TV of any variation is going to consume more Power.

    • @lovemadeinjapan
      @lovemadeinjapan ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HiltTilt Duh.... You don't get my point.

    • @lovemadeinjapan
      @lovemadeinjapan ปีที่แล้ว

      @TheRealJohnHooper and is probably on all the time. My point was to relate to time spend on consuming screen media as a household. Our electricity use rises, not falls.

    • @xfghffhfg
      @xfghffhfg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lovemadeinjapan If you used the same size of screen it would be lower.

    • @lovemadeinjapan
      @lovemadeinjapan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@xfghffhfg Yeah, but we don't. 14 inch baby 4K Oled.... To make things even worse: back then we had a single TV with 5 people. Today they probably all have one for themselves.

  • @Rleatfitness
    @Rleatfitness 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just bought a new tv and was so confused why they all seemed to be so terribly rated for energy

  • @ThreechTHEdruid
    @ThreechTHEdruid 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    good things cost kinda sad but i would not go back active speakers and oled just too nice experience

  • @rodsradios
    @rodsradios 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi E.V. Does it.
    On March 1 this year the energy ratings for T.Vs were reclassified in that a set @ "B" rating previously became a "G" rating under the new terms.
    This was introduced to remove the confusion whereby A+++ , A++ A+ and A had developed in the system previously. In any case your TV is currently costing about 1Penny per hour to run, - not bad value don't you think?

    • @mk4reala965
      @mk4reala965 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Slightly more I think ...?

  • @fabriglas
    @fabriglas 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Didn't know the energy scale changed

  • @2too
    @2too 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That energy take is for full brightness, and HDR. plug in your tv in energy meter to see real energy takes! Nobody use TV for full brightness.

    • @2too
      @2too 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/O8K_2Rj3Y2E/w-d-xo.htmlsi=q67Uu0Uisi5Oj93H. That is for real energy takes

  • @2kBofFun
    @2kBofFun ปีที่แล้ว

    They probably rate so bad because of the incredible short lifespan and horrible built quality.

  • @Astersheen
    @Astersheen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't understand your accent