He wants to go back to when women couldn't vote okay 💀 let's go back to the days when African Americans like his self were 2nd class citizen and black men we're treated worse than white women.
Women shouldn't have the right to vote. The fact that others have been denied that right is neither here nor there. It was correctly denied to women at the time, and we continue to pay a heavy price for having given a loaded pistol to self-absorbed infants.
@@65if2007 um what are you just saying women shouldn't vote to be sexist, or are you talking about the history of women not being able to vote I'm not trying to be rude, but I need more context cause I can't understand what you're trying to say
@@myiesha5947 Context? You need CONTEXT? My God, you're as sharp as a tack, aren't you? You're an example of the point that I was making. And I AM trying to be rude.
@@rodintremboy6459 No it wasn’t. White women voting is not equal to black people suffering. I’d stop them voting a hundred times before the latter He answered correctly!
Because "going forward" is not characterized by the systematic mxrdxr of defenseless unborn children in order to solve another person's problem stemming (overwhelmingly) from their lack of self-control.
On January 6th did Donald Trump mean peaceful and patriotically protest. No that was to cover his ass. Behind the scenes he was chastising the police for screening his protesters for weapons. He proclaimed, they are not here to hurt me. This heavy black grifter is Targeting in his comments towards a specific audience. He doesn't care about the political blowback because he's after the support of the Trump base.
Yeah he just don't like what people are fighting for these days... Economic Justice, equality for everyone even if they don't believe in your bronze age man God, etc.
It was because it completely changes the meaning when you isolate the quote. Out of context, it means he wants women to lose the right to vote; in context, he's saying he want Republicans to become agents of social change again (paraphrasing his words).
@@AfricanThinker86 It still remains. He was given the choice between events in history and events occurring at the same time. Picking the lesser of the 2 evils doesn't make him a good candidate at all.
@@AfricanThinker86 He could have said, "I don't want to go back to EITHER situation - AND, did you know back then Republicans were pushing change?" But he didn't. He was very comfortable throwing women under the bus. He's got a history of misogyny that goes way beyond this single uncomfortably-contexted quote. He's said that feminism comes from Satan. Seriously.
@@stevenread5473no, they were not. They may have been more progressive compared to today but not left wing multiple genders progressive. The Democrats have always been the more progressive Party. Woodrow Wilson is a far left socialist and also a racist.
@@ademanster unfortunately you can't roll back what this guy said and pass it off as a dog whistle. You do realize being a racist or bigot is the most acceptable it's ever going to be right now, you might as well be openly bigoted while you can.
Nah his answer just went deeper than a Christian or non Christian thought because at those times the dems and Republicans were trying to get any vote they could.. back in the days of real ballot casting...and by the way seems that if you say real Christian then fact check what the Bible says about women see how you correct the GOD OF ABRAHAM ISAAC AND JACOB...❤
😂 so how you answer that question determines whether you're a real Christian? That sounds quite legalistic. You're wrong. It's knowing who Jesus was and what He accomplished and having a personal relationship with Him and believing in your heart who he was and what he accomplished.
In the early 1900s, the Republican Party was the liberal party and Democrats were conservatives. The parties switched platforms completely by the 1930. So by saying Republicans fought for sufferage, he’s right…but that was when The Republican Party was liberal.
I don't get it. He's still saying that time was preferable. The fact that he explained why he prefers it doesn't make it ok. Kind of like saying "I'd like to live in the Conquistadores' Americas because at least back then people wanted adventure". He thinks "Republicans for a cause" is a fair trade for suffrage, right?
Hell, at that time, he would be liable to be lynched for daring to speak. He should be careful of what he wishes for, he would find it very dangerous for him, and people of color. He is in North Carolina, where segregation was legal from 1868 on, after the Civil war was over. The civil rights movement in NC became open in the 1960’s in Greensboro, women won the right to vote in 1920. This guy is just another hypocrite
What is amazing is your inability to think. For clarity, an intelligent person response to this question neither time is a good in America’s history. Denying any person their rights is just wrong. However, people who have no character or morals will spew hatred and bias all day long and those that gravitate towards it, truly are mentally and emotionally damaged. Now you need to read a book and learn more about the country history, Declaration of Independence, and constitution. LOL
I guess it's a headline because ...despite their bible saying 365 times "Be not afraid", evangelical Christians are terribly afraid these days and have no way of dealing with things that scare them other than being hateful. Just a guess.
@@coraggio93well, they seem to try to make up for that with hatred, hypocrisy, money, and sexual depravity. Jerry Falwell, Jr, Billy Graham’s son, and oh, so many more, living lives of sin by their own definition, and lecturing everyone else on proper behavior, while plotting to destroy our democracy in favor of their tyrannical rule. All in spite of Jesus: “My Kingdom is not of this earth.”
Someone needs to fact check the fact check. In the original video clip he states the question asked as “what America” not “which America”. He states, “What America are we going back to to make America great again? The one where women couldn’t vote or the one where black people were swinging from trees?…” He could have chosen to answer the first question and describe the America he wants to go back to, though maybe he did do just that.
He's being a bit more misleading and the fact check missed the mark. He wanted to make the point that the modern Republican party resembles the Republican Party of 1920. Politically they were liberal progressive in 1920 not the conservative party they are today. The conservative party, Democratic Party, opposed women voting in 1920. He was careful avoid describing it from a political point of view instead he chose to use party affiliation which without context is very misleading.
He should have said to go back to when Americans took pride in and cared about this country. When immigrants came to our country legally. And assimilated and pledged their allegiance to our flag and country. A time when immigrants contributed to our country instead of getting handouts. Those are the kind of immigrants America needs. Not the ones who come illegally and hate America.
Soooo?? He was making a point, which was still a bad point. No, let's not go back to when black people were hanging from trees because that would effect me. Let's go back to when women could not vote, which would not effect me, because that was a better time. How does any of this make sense and how dumb does anyone have to be to think this man is good for NC as an entire state representative?
@@winslowbrewer821 Robinson is a clown. He doesn’t even realize that both times in history were one and the same. This modern day party is extremely dangerous…
He was making evidently a point that went over a lot of peoples heads that back in that time error both parties were pulling together to get a moral and controversial act passed for all people to vote..women and at one time Black people able to vote..now it's dems want stand with Republicans even if it's good for the whole u.s. or not and Republicans want stand with democrats if it's good for the American people either..it's a party war that's KILLING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE...HE JUST MIGHT WANT BOTH PARTIES PULLING TOGETHER TO DO WHATS RIGHT FOR ALL NORTH CAROLINIAN AND THEN TOGETHER FOR THE WHOLE USA...
Except he's not trying to progress things for women like old time Republicans did a century ago. It's not out of context at all. He's a horrible person.
No he chose right and I’m a woman. No one should ever be killed color don’t matter. Besides we could fight that fight. The black men would still be dead!
It’s almost like saying as an Indigenous to these lands, I’d like to go back to the times when Natives were annihilated because it set up the moments for sovereign recognition later and the reservations we live on now. In other words, the context in this and in Robinson’s quote are idiotic and unnecessary. And for media to defend it adds to the idiocy and downward spiral media is going. #DoBetter 🤦🏽♂️
Nah they just make women cover their heads and stay home and not have rights at all and make boys dress up like girls until they start getting beard hair.
The man has problems. He was raised in an abusive household. His father was an alcoholic, and he and his siblings were shipped to foster care for quite a while. I've heard some of his speeches, and it all sounds hateful. He seems to be resentful and angry, and if he could pull it off, I have no doubt he would take womens rights to vote away. He already thinks we should all be at home barefoot and pregnant. But, who knows how NC will vote. They may want this sort of extreme.
Look into Sinclair media and how they own 60-70 of the local TV broadcast. A lot of right-wingers like to use the clip of all the different news shows saying the same thing at once but what they don't tell you is that the owner of all those new stations is a MAGA billionaire. Think John Oliver did a really good piece on it
He could have said we're not going back to either. And Finish with "what a stupid question". So , now we know he prefers the time when there was slavery.
@@BigBadBrainshe could have said neither.. no one said "you have to choose between these equally shitty realities." He chose to answer the way he did... No spinning his way out of it.
No, men are the reason woman can vote. Woman didn't want to vote because of the other responsibilities that were required when you become a registered voter like mandatory fire brigades.
Regardless of social media and other media taking his comments out of context, he is still out of order. The premise of the question requires more intelligence and thought than he could muster. For that reason, have a seat Sir. Over there.
“I absolutely want to go back to the America where women couldn’t vote,” Robinson said in a newly resurfaced video of his remarks at a March 2020 event hosted by the Republican Women of Pitt County.
He should have said “neither.” But when posed with a dichotomous question like the one asked of Robinson, the natural psychological response is to block out other options and look critically at the two choices you’ve been given. To me, all this shows is that Mr. Robinson did not anticipate being presented with a “false dichotomy.” The implicit “rule” of a dichotomous question is that there are no other options. People who follow the rules then answer accordingly. The big takeaway from this, in my opinion, is that Mr. Robinson will be disadvantaged by his lack of experience playing political games.
Black people were swinging from Trees During the same period of time when women couldn’t Vote. That was a stupid question You needed to have probed that question harder. Both issues happened prior to 1920
I see a lot of people here defending him by saying "But that's how a 'Would you rather' question works!" So you mean like the questions schoolchildren ask, like "Would you rather be eaten by a shark or a lion?"...You can say that those questions are a "thing," but they're no less IDIOTIC! It's not a serious question to ask a serious politician... It's meaningless! Why would he even play along with that, just say "That's stupid, obviously neither." "Yeah, but you HAVE TO pick one!" "No, I don't. Next question."
Yes... but if pointedly asked today JUST that question.... what would his answer be? Also.... any politician knows that saying this in ANY context is ridiculous. He was looking for something
Thank you for fact checking even when that goes largely unappreciated. People on the right seem to hate being fact-checked on their nonsense, and based on the comments section for this video, so do people on the left. I appreciate this dedication to the truth whether it supports my world-view or not, so thank you.
At least we agree that there is "nonsense" on the left. Thank you (also) for acknowledging that there are different worldviews backing each set of political candidates, parties, and legislative goals.
These comments make my brain. We are lost as a society. If you have to choose one, neither isn't an option. Stop trying to demonize someone for actually answering a question as opposed to someone who dodges them all.
Time to stick it to the rich leftist in this State Lt. Gov. Robinson. You have had my vote in the past, and my friends and family will continue to vote for you.
Whoa, what kind of News ‘fact check’ is this? Sorry dude still comes of sounding bad. The correct answer, and yes there is a *correct* response, is to first call out the question for its ridiculousnesses and then say you will fight for the civil rights of all Americans!!!
Mark Robinson won both his primary and general election for lieutenant governor here in NC against a field of over a dozen different primary "MeToo!™" challengers, with comparatively little funding and virtually no media support, because of grassroots organizations that worked outside of the mainstream blockade and got out the vote. Don't underestimate him or his team.
I'm not a Conservative and don't care for Mr. Robinson but I felt there was more to what he said about women not being able to vote than what social media is circulating. Context and fact checking is a must no matter if it's someone who has the same views as you or not.
The contest actually makes the whole comment WORSE, not better. America when women couldn't vote was the SAME America when Blacks were being 'hung from trees" all over the South. So no matter what answer he gave, he wants to go back to an America when non-Whites were murdered by whites with impunity.
To add a little more context . Robinson was trying to make the point that Republicans in 1920 fought for social change and for the right of women to vote . What's missing is that the Republican party then was a progressive liberal party. THe conservative party fought against the rights of women to vote, the Southern Democrats were the conservative party not the Republican party as Robinson suggests. Robinson is being a bit dishonest here when he attempts to align the modern Republican party with the Republican Party of 1920. Ever since LBJ signed the equal rights act conservatives have fled the Democratic party for the Republican party . Mark Robinson in no way supports a woman's right to make her own reproductive healthcare decisions.
Thank you for reminding folks of history. That maybe should have been in this verify clip as well, rather than just providing the rest of his statement. I am certain that many Americans have likely forgotten this US History lesson.
"Mark Robinson in no way supports a woman's right to make her own reproductive healthcare decisions." Healthcare does not involve the intentional killing of human beings. Thanks for clarifying on just what side you stand, though.
You didn’t mention in 1915, Republicans were a very different part that not At the Civil Rights movement of the 1960’s - The racist switched sides with most going to Republicans
No he was set up..I do hope that he watches out for sli leftists tactics in the future but in reality he's for the people BLACK,WHITE,ASIAN, INDIAN, MAN,AND WOMEN...REALLY DO YOU THINK THAT THOSE KIND OF STATEMENTS WOULD BE MADE IN A VOTING SEASON...
He clearly said that at the time women couldn't vote, Republicans were working for real social change including the women's right to vote. He's a Republican and he was saying that Republicans were right to fight for the woman's right to vote. Whether the Republicans actually were fighting for that, or whether the Democrats were fighting for it I don't know, but the point is he thinks that it's a good thing that women have the right to vote and that if he lived at a time when they didn't have that right, he would have been fighting for it.
He is a sanctimonious self indulgent man, addicted to porn, and apparently blames women for that. Time to study this hypocrites lies and omissions, let alone his emissions, which deserve an even greater study
But they didn't go quite far enough. You see Robinson wanted to point out that the 1920 Republican PArty was aligned with the 2024 Republican PArty. They were not. THe conservative party in 1920 was the democratic party not the Republican Party. The conservative party squarely opposed women voting. He was careful not to use political orientation in the discussion but instead used party affiliation.
That is the weakest argument for what he said. Actually that is no argument for what he said. Why news media grades these types of people on a curve is beyond me. That we are taking it out of context? Give me a break. Fact check my butt. How about all the other horrendous things he has said against gays and how vile he is overall but you're going to give him a pass on this? Give me a break.
Robinson knew that after the gays were given the right to marriage over all fifty states back in 2015, it would not be long before the alphabet community stepped up indoctrination (and conversion) of other people's children to their lifestyle in their previously safe spaces.
This guy claims he is Chrisitan. And the context thing is an excuse. You better believe he would push for it. I've heard this ones soeeches a few times, and he seems deeply disturbed. His traumatic childhood experiences have made him full of rage and hate. He may be alot of things, but I don't see Christianity in him. He doesn't talk with mercy and love Jesus would whatsoever.
I'm presuming (correctly?) that you identify yourself with Christ... Is it "mercy and love" which encourages (Robinson's opponent) Josh Stein to support women consenting to have their unborn children legally killed at anytime prior and leading up to birth? 🤔
There were a lot of ways he could have answered the question that didn't involve either scenario... Like saying "Neither, because in America we move forwards, not backwards, and I believe that myself and the Republicans will move us into a brighter future." But no... He said "a time when women couldn't vote, because the Republicans brought about real social change"
@@TheConqueror253 I know, I still hope some people will see the light, and realize you always have a choice.. Mark Robinson chose to be a bigot.. What will the rest of you choose?
Robinson's comments are NOT controversial. He just tells it like it is....if you woke folks don't like him, turn the channel. The people of North Carolina LOVE him! He stands up and he speaks for the people!
And Hitler speak to the people too! So in other words white people are racist! But black people are not??? Hate is hate! It doesn't have a skin colored!
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 80 | คู่เอก "รักษ์ vs ยอดนำชัย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ckLMRorsMeY/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.8 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7OwUsMs0M5s/mqdefault.jpg)
So he did say it. Thanks for confirming.
He does know that women not voting in America is the same American where he couldn’t vote either right?
Tap dancers for WS don't care about the details.
He wants to go back to when women couldn't vote okay 💀 let's go back to the days when African Americans like his self were 2nd class citizen and black men we're treated worse than white women.
Women shouldn't have the right to vote. The fact that others have been denied that right is neither here nor there. It was correctly denied to women at the time, and we continue to pay a heavy price for having given a loaded pistol to self-absorbed infants.
@@65if2007 um what are you just saying women shouldn't vote to be sexist, or are you talking about the history of women not being able to vote I'm not trying to be rude, but I need more context cause I can't understand what you're trying to say
@@myiesha5947 Context? You need CONTEXT? My God, you're as sharp as a tack, aren't you? You're an example of the point that I was making. And I AM trying to be rude.
His answer should have been “Niether!” He set himself up for that.
Thats not how a "Would you rather" question works
@@spider-spectre Good on you for taking the bait then. Cheers 🥂
@@juliaarambula3153he didn’t. And the question was answered by Robinson correctly
@@wa-bu3ke again the correct answer was neither.
@@rodintremboy6459 No it wasn’t. White women voting is not equal to black people suffering. I’d stop them voting a hundred times before the latter
He answered correctly!
Why does American need to go back? Here’s a concept: why don’t we try to go forward?
Exactly!
Like Harris / Walz say:
“We’re NOT GOING BACK” !!!! 💙🇺🇸
@bonniegaither3994 he has to be a cuck for the modern Republican Sharty 😂🤷🏾♂️
Because "going forward" is not characterized by the systematic mxrdxr of defenseless unborn children in order to solve another person's problem stemming (overwhelmingly) from their lack of self-control.
@@user-gy3vp3tm3sbut what about the children that are like actually alive😭
That's right. Let's go back to the time where women couldn't vote because people fought for things like women's right to vote... 😂
On January 6th did Donald Trump mean peaceful and patriotically protest. No that was to cover his ass. Behind the scenes he was chastising the police for screening his protesters for weapons. He proclaimed, they are not here to hurt me.
This heavy black grifter is Targeting in his comments towards a specific audience. He doesn't care about the political blowback because he's after the support of the Trump base.
Yeah he just don't like what people are fighting for these days... Economic Justice, equality for everyone even if they don't believe in your bronze age man God, etc.
The answer should have neither. The Republican party of the past is different Republican party of today. Going backwards is not the answer.
This was not taken out of context. Both situations were oppressive and happened at the same time. He is what I call dangerously ignorant.
It was because it completely changes the meaning when you isolate the quote. Out of context, it means he wants women to lose the right to vote; in context, he's saying he want Republicans to become agents of social change again (paraphrasing his words).
@@AfricanThinker86 It still remains. He was given the choice between events in history and events occurring at the same time. Picking the lesser of the 2 evils doesn't make him a good candidate at all.
@@hateisbad *angry caps- okay* I wouldn't dare post without watching first.
@@AfricanThinker86 He could have said, "I don't want to go back to EITHER situation - AND, did you know back then Republicans were pushing change?" But he didn't. He was very comfortable throwing women under the bus. He's got a history of misogyny that goes way beyond this single uncomfortably-contexted quote. He's said that feminism comes from Satan. Seriously.
How about saying “neither”. 🙄
Nothing you presented here makes anything better
America wasn't "better" in the 1920s. But the Republican party was.
The Republican PArty was liberal and progressive in 1920. He avoids bringing that point up.
@@stevenread5473no, they were not. They may have been more progressive compared to today but not left wing multiple genders progressive. The Democrats have always been the more progressive Party. Woodrow Wilson is a far left socialist and also a racist.
@@stevenread5473FDR was a republican?
No. Stop with your nonsensical arguments.
@@jax97991 The Republican party was liberal party. Southern Democrats were the conservative segregationists.
@@jax97991 They said 1920. FDR was 1936. I wonder if anything happened in that period?
I mean, when women couldn't vote black people were still hanging from trees then too so its a flawed question to begin with.
Agreed! Also, why would anyone want to go back to such times? Why are Republicans even asking and answering this question?
So you didn’t watch the video.
@@jenniwalters1930God Bless Mark Robinson. This is spun and lefty lies
@@jenniwalters1930because a lefty liar asked the question to bait and lie. Lefty liars be a lying because that's what lefty liars do.
@@wa-bu3ke but why was the even a question to begin with?
Somehow republican women will still vote for him lol
Shows you didn’t watch the video only the headline. It was taken out of context
This guy is worse than Majorie Traitor Greene. Only an absolute bigot would agree with anything this nut job has to say.
@@wa-bu3keno they never watch the video, they only watch headlines
@@ademanster unfortunately you can't roll back what this guy said and pass it off as a dog whistle. You do realize being a racist or bigot is the most acceptable it's ever going to be right now, you might as well be openly bigoted while you can.
@@wa-bu3ke nah you missed the real context. which is that the question and answer were bad to begin with.
Weak argument. His answer easily should have been neither. Period. Stop making excuses.
Correct!
Nope. He gave the correct answer. Women not voting and black people not being genocided is preferrable.
Agreed, plus why would we want to go backwards to ANY point in time, instead of moving forward.
He’s confused about the Republicans at that time
U dumn, this is a 2 option hypothetical, not open discussion on the subject. pick ONE
Simply staggering… are these women really defending this guy?
If he was a true Christian Robinson's answer to that question should have been NEITHER of those Americas! (point blank, end of story)
EXACTLY!!!
Nah his answer just went deeper than a Christian or non Christian thought because at those times the dems and Republicans were trying to get any vote they could.. back in the days of real ballot casting...and by the way seems that if you say real Christian then fact check what the Bible says about women see how you correct the GOD OF ABRAHAM ISAAC AND JACOB...❤
😂 so how you answer that question determines whether you're a real Christian? That sounds quite legalistic. You're wrong. It's knowing who Jesus was and what He accomplished and having a personal relationship with Him and believing in your heart who he was and what he accomplished.
But then isn’t he missing the context that those republicans were liberal in their time?
War on women continues
Didn’t watch the video, huh?
@@danieljohnson5495this jackass is nothing but the usual GREASY OLD PIG CLOWN SHOW
Lefty robots are out in full on this black man. The Democrat Party is still the party of racism, they are just less obvious about it!!
Oh please! The war on women? LMAO!!!!!
@@ral8031 looks like it could use some reduction
NEITHER
is the right answer!
In the early 1900s, the Republican Party was the liberal party and Democrats were conservatives. The parties switched platforms completely by the 1930. So by saying Republicans fought for sufferage, he’s right…but that was when The Republican Party was liberal.
I don't get it. He's still saying that time was preferable. The fact that he explained why he prefers it doesn't make it ok. Kind of like saying "I'd like to live in the Conquistadores' Americas because at least back then people wanted adventure". He thinks "Republicans for a cause" is a fair trade for suffrage, right?
Correct? These folks at this new stations cannot call themselves journalist. LOL
Hell, at that time, he would be liable to be lynched for daring to speak. He should be careful of what he wishes for, he would find it very dangerous for him, and people of color. He is in North Carolina, where segregation was legal from 1868 on, after the Civil war was over. The civil rights movement in NC became open in the 1960’s in Greensboro, women won the right to vote in 1920. This guy is just another hypocrite
@@susiepace2125and you are no thinker
What is amazing is your inability to think. For clarity, an intelligent person response to this question neither time is a good in America’s history. Denying any person their rights is just wrong. However, people who have no character or morals will spew hatred and bias all day long and those that gravitate towards it, truly are mentally and emotionally damaged. Now you need to read a book and learn more about the country history, Declaration of Independence, and constitution. LOL
Do you still beat your partner? Simple question
Why is this a headline IN AMERICA IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY
I guess it's a headline because ...despite their bible saying 365 times "Be not afraid", evangelical Christians are terribly afraid these days and have no way of dealing with things that scare them other than being hateful.
Just a guess.
@@coraggio93well, they seem to try to make up for that with hatred, hypocrisy, money, and sexual depravity. Jerry Falwell, Jr, Billy Graham’s son, and oh, so many more, living lives of sin by their own definition, and lecturing everyone else on proper behavior, while plotting to destroy our democracy in favor of their tyrannical rule. All in spite of Jesus: “My Kingdom is not of this earth.”
It’s out of context. Watch the video
@@wa-bu3ke he’s still a wanker
@@wa-bu3ke Nope, it's exactly the sexist context that it's presented in 🤷
Someone needs to fact check the fact check. In the original video clip he states the question asked as “what America” not “which America”. He states, “What America are we going back to to make America great again? The one where women couldn’t vote or the one where black people were swinging from trees?…” He could have chosen to answer the first question and describe the America he wants to go back to, though maybe he did do just that.
He's being a bit more misleading and the fact check missed the mark. He wanted to make the point that the modern Republican party resembles the Republican Party of 1920. Politically they were liberal progressive in 1920 not the conservative party they are today. The conservative party, Democratic Party, opposed women voting in 1920. He was careful avoid describing it from a political point of view instead he chose to use party affiliation which without context is very misleading.
Exactly. Fact checking is needed. Dems don’t give the whole story when part looks better for them.
He should have said to go back to when Americans took pride in and cared about this country. When immigrants came to our country legally. And assimilated and pledged their allegiance to our flag and country. A time when immigrants contributed to our country instead of getting handouts. Those are the kind of immigrants America needs. Not the ones who come illegally and hate America.
So he still thinks women shouldn't vote.
Watch the video before spamming like a bot
Pay attention racist.
Baste
@@piusvaporyou and unlce ruckus here are the racists rofl
Knows*
Clean up on aisle misogyny. How often do y'all do clean up jobs when "other" politician statements are taken out of context?
Soooo?? He was making a point, which was still a bad point. No, let's not go back to when black people were hanging from trees because that would effect me. Let's go back to when women could not vote, which would not effect me, because that was a better time. How does any of this make sense and how dumb does anyone have to be to think this man is good for NC as an entire state representative?
Robinson for the win ! You must not have watched the complete video…. Try again lefty
@@winslowbrewer821 Robinson is a clown. He doesn’t even realize that both times in history were one and the same. This modern day party is extremely dangerous…
@@winslowbrewer821 dear lord you conservatards are so braindead.
He was making evidently a point that went over a lot of peoples heads that back in that time error both parties were pulling together to get a moral and controversial act passed for all people to vote..women and at one time Black people able to vote..now it's dems want stand with Republicans even if it's good for the whole u.s. or not and Republicans want stand with democrats if it's good for the American people either..it's a party war that's KILLING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE...HE JUST MIGHT WANT BOTH PARTIES PULLING TOGETHER TO DO WHATS RIGHT FOR ALL NORTH CAROLINIAN AND THEN TOGETHER FOR THE WHOLE USA...
Except he's not trying to progress things for women like old time Republicans did a century ago. It's not out of context at all. He's a horrible person.
He needs to step down now. Hes as bad as trump
No he chose right and I’m a woman. No one should ever be killed color don’t matter. Besides we could fight that fight. The black men would still be dead!
He still supports going back even with the context. Why would he ask himself those questions??
Fine than don’t tax us you men can pay all the taxes
who ask such a stupid question of anyone, Mark should have said we are going forward not back or I want neither.
The women of NC need to vote agains Mark Robinson while they still have the right to do so.
It’s almost like saying as an Indigenous to these lands, I’d like to go back to the times when Natives were annihilated because it set up the moments for sovereign recognition later and the reservations we live on now. In other words, the context in this and in Robinson’s quote are idiotic and unnecessary. And for media to defend it adds to the idiocy and downward spiral media is going. #DoBetter 🤦🏽♂️
i live in middle east and even i never heard a politician say sht like this 😂
Nah they just make women cover their heads and stay home and not have rights at all and make boys dress up like girls until they start getting beard hair.
The man has problems. He was raised in an abusive household. His father was an alcoholic, and he and his siblings were shipped to foster care for quite a while. I've heard some of his speeches, and it all sounds hateful. He seems to be resentful and angry, and if he could pull it off, I have no doubt he would take womens rights to vote away. He already thinks we should all be at home barefoot and pregnant. But, who knows how NC will vote. They may want this sort of extreme.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
I can’t believe this new station is condoning what he said and backing him
Look into Sinclair media and how they own 60-70 of the local TV broadcast. A lot of right-wingers like to use the clip of all the different news shows saying the same thing at once but what they don't tell you is that the owner of all those new stations is a MAGA billionaire. Think John Oliver did a really good piece on it
He could have said we're not going back to either. And Finish with "what a stupid question".
So , now we know he prefers the time when there was slavery.
Damn. Women couldn’t vote. GOP going to become Grand dad’s party.
This aged like fine wine 😂😂😂
No, the right answer would be I would not go back to either
That wasn't the questions she posed. "Neither" wasn't an option. He chose the lesser of two evils, hypothetically. Grow up.
@@BigBadBrainshe could have said neither.. no one said "you have to choose between these equally shitty realities." He chose to answer the way he did...
No spinning his way out of it.
@@toddwilliams2124 exactly!
@@juliaarambula3153i think we need a good far right vice president like him I hate democrats cause they don't stand for my vaules
He should have simply said neither
He shouldnt have answered at all...when in fact, he should have went around the question like what normally politicians do...
Whether he said it or not, he's 100% correct.
That's not a defense since both of those were at the same time.
Women are the reason women can vote. Both parties resisted that change.
Didn’t men have to give women the right to vote? 🤔
No, men are the reason woman can vote. Woman didn't want to vote because of the other responsibilities that were required when you become a registered voter like mandatory fire brigades.
That is a flat out lie or you are extremely ignorant on your history.
No. Conservatives resisted the change. Women voting was not a conservative idea.
Incorrect, white knight cucks are to blame.
I'm pretty sure the answer is neither. JS.
I guess this dude doesnt know that that means black people were being hung at that time. That was an ignorant question.
"swinging from trees"
No, that's not a tilted question at all....
Regardless of social media and other media taking his comments out of context, he is still out of order. The premise of the question requires more intelligence and thought than he could muster. For that reason, have a seat Sir. Over there.
Maybe you don't understand the word 'context', or maybe you are for blacks swinging from trees. Have a seat.
Thank you! Well said!
“I absolutely want to go back to the America where women couldn’t vote,” Robinson said in a newly resurfaced video of his remarks at a March 2020 event hosted by the Republican Women of Pitt County.
He should have said “neither.” But when posed with a dichotomous question like the one asked of Robinson, the natural psychological response is to block out other options and look critically at the two choices you’ve been given. To me, all this shows is that Mr. Robinson did not anticipate being presented with a “false dichotomy.” The implicit “rule” of a dichotomous question is that there are no other options. People who follow the rules then answer accordingly. The big takeaway from this, in my opinion, is that Mr. Robinson will be disadvantaged by his lack of experience playing political games.
Black people were swinging from Trees During the same period of time when women couldn’t Vote. That was a stupid question You needed to have probed that question harder. Both issues happened prior to 1920
If he were a Democrat this would be treated like so many Biden comments.....excused.
😂 nice try.
@@happylibrarian542 Loaned out many pr0n books (depicting boy-on-boy Phil Laytio) to young impressionable male middle-school students lately? 📙👀
I wonder what Fat Albert plans to do after he loses the election?
That's.. dissapointing.
I see a lot of people here defending him by saying "But that's how a 'Would you rather' question works!"
So you mean like the questions schoolchildren ask, like "Would you rather be eaten by a shark or a lion?"...You can say that those questions are a "thing," but they're no less IDIOTIC!
It's not a serious question to ask a serious politician... It's meaningless!
Why would he even play along with that, just say "That's stupid, obviously neither." "Yeah, but you HAVE TO pick one!" "No, I don't. Next question."
unless they go MAGA
Women should not VOTE. If you do army time, then you are allowed to vote
So what about women who are born with a disability and they can’t serve in the military? did you think that through?
1:20 wasn't that the same time period?
If you don’t understand the context of the statement, I’d love to laugh at you 😂
Yes... but if pointedly asked today JUST that question.... what would his answer be?
Also.... any politician knows that saying this in ANY context is ridiculous. He was looking for something
Uh, WCNC? There IS no context for that except that this guy is shady and crazy. Thank you xD
Thank you for fact checking even when that goes largely unappreciated. People on the right seem to hate being fact-checked on their nonsense, and based on the comments section for this video, so do people on the left. I appreciate this dedication to the truth whether it supports my world-view or not, so thank you.
At least we agree that there is "nonsense" on the left.
Thank you (also) for acknowledging that there are different worldviews backing each set of political candidates, parties, and legislative goals.
These comments make my brain. We are lost as a society. If you have to choose one, neither isn't an option. Stop trying to demonize someone for actually answering a question as opposed to someone who dodges them all.
uncle Ruckus is real
There you go with the racist trope
that context does not make it better at all
God Bless Mark Robinson
I don’t like those red paints on typing key pad. Too evil this woman is satanic
Time to stick it to the rich leftist in this State Lt. Gov. Robinson. You have had my vote in the past, and my friends and family will continue to vote for you.
Just show us the video stop telling us what we should see what’s on the video and show it to us
Whoa, what kind of News ‘fact check’ is this? Sorry dude still comes of sounding bad. The correct answer, and yes there is a *correct* response, is to first call out the question for its ridiculousnesses and then say you will fight for the civil rights of all Americans!!!
That guy is no way going to prevail over Stein....and hey Robinson, lets fo back to the America where you could not vote either dude
Mark Robinson won both his primary and general election for lieutenant governor here in NC against a field of over a dozen different primary "MeToo!™" challengers, with comparatively little funding and virtually no media support, because of grassroots organizations that worked outside of the mainstream blockade and got out the vote. Don't underestimate him or his team.
I'm not a Conservative and don't care for Mr. Robinson but I felt there was more to what he said about women not being able to vote than what social media is circulating. Context and fact checking is a must no matter if it's someone who has the same views as you or not.
I've been trying to find that speech and am not having any luck finding it.
Except what he said was absolute BS.
@@toddwilliams2124 Very true but I wanted to hear the stupidity out of his mouth before I commented. 🤷♀
He still sounded idiotic, to be kind.
The left probably had video taken down so fact checkers would have trouble correcting thier slander...
Really based.
Good job for not slandering Mr. Robinson.
Wish he was Trump’s VP
You better read up on this porn addicted clown
Thank you for this explanation. Robinson is THE MAN. Yes, I am a woman.
Thank you for putting the whole context out there. I wish there were more trustworthy news outlets like yours.
The contest actually makes the whole comment WORSE, not better.
America when women couldn't vote was the SAME America when Blacks were being 'hung from trees" all over the South.
So no matter what answer he gave, he wants to go back to an America when non-Whites were murdered by whites with impunity.
Thanks for providing some objective context.
Haven't heard him defend that remark or rebutt...
NEITHER!!!
Thank you for telling the whole story and giving the context. It makes all the difference.
“Tokens get spent”
« Taken out of context » is a polite way to say the quote has been *truncated*
Its never what they said when they get caught saying it.
To add a little more context . Robinson was trying to make the point that Republicans in 1920 fought for social change and for the right of women to vote . What's missing is that the Republican party then was a progressive liberal party. THe conservative party fought against the rights of women to vote, the Southern Democrats were the conservative party not the Republican party as Robinson suggests. Robinson is being a bit dishonest here when he attempts to align the modern Republican party with the Republican Party of 1920. Ever since LBJ signed the equal rights act conservatives have fled the Democratic party for the Republican party . Mark Robinson in no way supports a woman's right to make her own reproductive healthcare decisions.
The turn happened after JFK was elected and snowballed from there.
Thank you for reminding folks of history. That maybe should have been in this verify clip as well, rather than just providing the rest of his statement. I am certain that many Americans have likely forgotten this US History lesson.
"Mark Robinson in no way supports a woman's right to make her own reproductive healthcare decisions."
Healthcare does not involve the intentional killing of human beings.
Thanks for clarifying on just what side you stand, though.
You didn’t mention in 1915, Republicans were a very different part that not At the Civil Rights movement of the 1960’s - The racist switched sides with most going to Republicans
"... and we'll have these n_ _ _ _ _s voting Democrat for the next two-hundred years." - Democrat U.S. President Lyndon Baines Johnson.
No he was set up..I do hope that he watches out for sli leftists tactics in the future but in reality he's for the people BLACK,WHITE,ASIAN, INDIAN, MAN,AND WOMEN...REALLY DO YOU THINK THAT THOSE KIND OF STATEMENTS WOULD BE MADE IN A VOTING SEASON...
Satan will attack Gods people. Go Mark, stand up for God.
He clearly said that at the time women couldn't vote, Republicans were working for real social change including the women's right to vote. He's a Republican and he was saying that Republicans were right to fight for the woman's right to vote. Whether the Republicans actually were fighting for that, or whether the Democrats were fighting for it I don't know, but the point is he thinks that it's a good thing that women have the right to vote and that if he lived at a time when they didn't have that right, he would have been fighting for it.
How I took this was him choosing living to fight to vote over ppl dying.
He is a sanctimonious self indulgent man, addicted to porn, and apparently blames women for that. Time to study this hypocrites lies and omissions, let alone his emissions, which deserve an even greater study
He was set up. Public speakers need to part their words much more carefully.
Great job reporting. Its encouraging to see journalists doing their job with integrity.
It's a rare thing and sorely missed.
But they didn't go quite far enough. You see Robinson wanted to point out that the 1920 Republican PArty was aligned with the 2024 Republican PArty. They were not. THe conservative party in 1920 was the democratic party not the Republican Party. The conservative party squarely opposed women voting. He was careful not to use political orientation in the discussion but instead used party affiliation.
@@stevenread5473 That's not the poing
That is the weakest argument for what he said. Actually that is no argument for what he said. Why news media grades these types of people on a curve is beyond me. That we are taking it out of context? Give me a break. Fact check my butt.
How about all the other horrendous things he has said against gays and how vile he is overall but you're going to give him a pass on this? Give me a break.
Robinson knew that after the gays were given the right to marriage over all fifty states back in 2015, it would not be long before the alphabet community stepped up indoctrination (and conversion) of other people's children to their lifestyle in their previously safe spaces.
This guy claims he is Chrisitan. And the context thing is an excuse. You better believe he would push for it. I've heard this ones soeeches a few times, and he seems deeply disturbed. His traumatic childhood experiences have made him full of rage and hate. He may be alot of things, but I don't see Christianity in him. He doesn't talk with mercy and love Jesus would whatsoever.
I'm presuming (correctly?) that you identify yourself with Christ... Is it "mercy and love" which encourages (Robinson's opponent) Josh Stein to support women consenting to have their unborn children legally killed at anytime prior and leading up to birth? 🤔
Fact check???? Hilarious!
BS
😂 its like asking people to choose between kicking a dog or throwing a cat and then flaming them for reluctantly choosing a hypothetical.
There were a lot of ways he could have answered the question that didn't involve either scenario... Like saying "Neither, because in America we move forwards, not backwards, and I believe that myself and the Republicans will move us into a brighter future."
But no...
He said "a time when women couldn't vote, because the Republicans brought about real social change"
So the problem with trying to intelligently justify bigotry is that bigotry and intelligence are on opposite ends of the spectrum.
@@TheConqueror253 I know, I still hope some people will see the light, and realize you always have a choice.. Mark Robinson chose to be a bigot..
What will the rest of you choose?
Exactly @@toddwilliams2124. Well said
He wasn't forced to make that choice. HE brought up the choice at a campaign speech.
Doesn't matter. This man is beyond awful. And anything dealing with that grifter Candice Owens is evil.
It is EXACTLY what he said. 🤦🏻♀️
Exactly and Black folks
We’re still swinging fromTrees and Republicans had abandoned Black people. So it is even worst. LOl
He speaks his mind . He stands for the truth. Leave him alone. I would like to go back to 2:17 the old America I grew up in too
That's easy enough. Just watch "Father Knows Best" and "The Donna Reed Show".
Wow😮
Robinson's comments are NOT controversial.
He just tells it like it is....if you woke folks don't like him, turn the channel.
The people of North Carolina LOVE him!
He stands up and he speaks for the people!
I love him too
Wow, a woman who doesn't think she should vote. I'm a woke Christian btw.
And Hitler speak to the people too! So in other words white people are racist! But black people are not??? Hate is hate! It doesn't have a skin colored!
I'm sure this comment will age like fine wine 😂😂😂😂
thats why trump loves the uneducated. this nutjob does to. hes a blatant misogynist, racist, homophobe, etc. the conservatards lap it up.
The correct answer was “NEITHER” 🤦🏾♀️
HISTORY IS NEVER TO BE REWRITTEN TO GO BACK IN HISTORY YOU GO FORWARD WITH HISTORY THAT THINGS GET BETTER FOR CHANGE AND CHANGE IT IS