Skirmish Wargame Rules Review: Anyone can learn this WARGAME in 5 MINUTES.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Rules Review: Anyone can learn this WARGAME in 5 MINUTES as Matt, Carl and Mark review and discuss the One-Hour Skirmish Wargames rules.
    00:00 Into
    01:14 Sequence of Play
    03:43 Combat Resolution
    06:13 Fun Factor
    07:59 Presentation
    09:20 Bonus Round!
    12:40 Recommend?
    Like Wargames? Check out Mark's website at www.fireballforward.com
    Questions, comments and suggestions? Contact us at markwargameroom@gmail.com
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 45

  • @oceanseabear
    @oceanseabear วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I'm a newbie in my 60's and this video & book has got me into the hobby. Suits me as its quick to set up & play & even my Wife has played a few times. I've used ACW units on a Goblin battle mat using adaptation of rules. Its got me reading more about the hobby & historical military books.
    Thanks,
    Mike

  • @jerrymail
    @jerrymail หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I just discovered "One-Hour Wargames" that I use for my ACW and 1870 6mm miniatures (and certainly 10mm fantasy figures quite soon), and I'm going to buy the Skirmish version, for my 1870 1/72 figures, Vietnam figures and Sci-fi. I was looking for this sort of games because I lack time to play more complex rules and I lack space too.
    So, thanks a lot for the review.

  • @tabletop.will.phillips
    @tabletop.will.phillips 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Have never had a chance to actually *run* a game from One-House Skirmish Wargames, but I do love the thought taken in the design of them! It's a welcome book in my gaming library.

  • @nerzenjaeger
    @nerzenjaeger ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thanks for doing a review on this underrated gem. Love the conversational tone and the production quality. Keep it up.

  • @grahamkorn6236
    @grahamkorn6236 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Yes these are skirmish but we've played quite big Starship Troopers games with 4-5 players each handling an infantry squad and the bug players get allocated bugs to control as they start to swarm. We modified the rules so that ALL the bugs move once at the start of their go and then any subsequent movement is based on their action card. We also introduced a house rule where if any bug moves within six inches of a squad they get an immediate reaction shot. Just one card against the bug's one card. It doesn't kill but it will stop the bug and drive it back one base depth.

  • @willtijerina5149
    @willtijerina5149 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great video guys. This one and One Hour Wargames (different author) are two of my current favorites.

  • @davidhouston4810
    @davidhouston4810 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Looks like Fun, what we used to call a "Beer and Pretzels" game.
    I'll be looking for it, I have all these figures hanging about.

  • @lucysblade
    @lucysblade ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thanks for the review…you got exactly what the rules set out to do…and what they can’t do.

    • @MarksGameRoom
      @MarksGameRoom  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks for watching! We've spent many hours enjoying your rules in a variety of settings and we're happy to recommend them.

    • @salagam
      @salagam ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Can't wait to pick them up.

  • @larrysmith703
    @larrysmith703 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Would love to see you guys do more with these rule sets with different time periods

  • @jpr5416
    @jpr5416 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your review convinced me to give this rule set a try. Thank you.

  • @everettsharp1917
    @everettsharp1917 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes, thumbs up from the UK, excellent review. Just ordered my copy, arriving in the first week of January. I do play with friends but health and age are reducing 'play time' so these look good for easily adapting to solo play on a smaller table.

  • @salagam
    @salagam ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Really interesting review. I'll be ordering these and then thinking what games I can play with them!

  • @Bugsy58
    @Bugsy58 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent review gentleman. I agree with all the points you raised and the way you qualified them. This is a perfect game for quick pickup game, where your gaming friends have not had the opportunity to organise a 'bigger' more in depth game, modern deal live can all too often disrupt that! Perfect, as you mentioned, for gaming through those more minor actions of a campaign. These rules, like others of this level and complexity, lend themselves to artistic, inventive, narrative orientated scenarios. Where the fun is found in playing out the scenario objective/s. All too many sets of rules over emphasise fancy, complicated rules mechanics, turning the games played into more like a chess match!
    I love this game for what fun it provides me and others who I game with.
    I very much enjoyed your review and thank you for posting.
    Liked and subscribed accordingly.😉

  • @michaeldecarlo6945
    @michaeldecarlo6945 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Easy going review. Nicely done.

  • @spcwolf
    @spcwolf 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Like the different perspectives

  • @seanhillman1016
    @seanhillman1016 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review. I will be picking this one up.

  • @stevenverdoliva6217
    @stevenverdoliva6217 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the review post at the same time as the gaming video. Well done.

  • @AA-pd7xf
    @AA-pd7xf 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think this is a fair review. I spent a bunch of time playing and reviewing this when it came out, and JL was kind enough to weigh in with some clarifications. I will disagree with your "three pros" on the rulebook. It is conversational, yes, but it is confusing, with essential rules scattered around in sections 20 pages away. It desperately needs a "bullet point" at the top, with the chattiness afterwards. It is a very simple game, but you can tell from the errors people make playing it early on that the rulebook is only going to work for a diligent and careful reader at first.
    Secondly, I think that while you correctly emphasize the game as a true skirmish game of 5-10 figs per side [up to 15 with experience] you don't emphasize enough that card draws can be extremely unfair and result in one side "not having fun" periodically. So anytime that one pulls this game out, one has to accept that the RAW allows this. With simple modifications, nearly any of the game's limits can be 'shaped' to taste, but people of a fragile emotional disposition may grow to hate the game.
    Finally, a point that deserves considerable emphasis - while the rules are very simple, winning with the game regularly is a bit tricky [so it rewards a thoughtful player] yet new players [which the hobby DESPERATELY needs] can throw down and start playing quickly. Because the mechanics are not complex, winning tactics become apparent to an experienced gamer in 1-2 sessions, and a true newbie may start figuring them out right away with a bit of help.
    A revolutionary game system!

  • @BillsWargameWorld
    @BillsWargameWorld ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice and enjoyed your review

  • @hamsteronthepaintingtable6465
    @hamsteronthepaintingtable6465 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the review 👍🏻

  • @WARdROBEPlaysWWII
    @WARdROBEPlaysWWII ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review

  • @thomaschase7097
    @thomaschase7097 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for sharing. A great game for introducing new players.

  • @michaelkiplinger8473
    @michaelkiplinger8473 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for sharing your videos and for introducing and reviewing the One Hour Skirmish Wargaming rule set.
    Not to put you on the spot, but since you gentlemen have more experience with the rule set, how do you resolve infantry close combat attacks on vehicles (Tanks). The rules warn against letting infantry get super close to vehicles, but I am not seeing a process to resolve an infantry attack at Armor Piercing value of 1. Thank you for your help.

  • @theandf
    @theandf ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretty good review! I think this kind of simple games are really needed. As for "skirmish": "a game of individual figures" is probably one of the defining aspects of skirmish games. Though it's a grey area, and it's also about the "scale" of the engagement: for example Ambush Alley doesn't allow you to command individual figures, yet I'd still rate it as a skirmish game. Most "Big Brand" wargames are skirmish games too, in my opinion, in the sense that if they were real they'd be reported in the news as "a skirmish between loyalist and chaos forces", not enough figures or room for anything else!

  • @GrayArmyGaming
    @GrayArmyGaming 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can’t wait to try it out with Star Wars! 😉🔥

  • @oblomovbruce9979
    @oblomovbruce9979 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The presentation looks like the 1970's Featherstone books - not a negative. Still will stick with 'Arc of Fire' for anything 1890ish-present.

  • @StatsScott
    @StatsScott ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice review video. Thorough without being too long with fair/objective discussion/evaluation. The only questions I have after watching are - with combat, does the card mechanic factor in cover at all? And you talked a bit about some optional rules to build in some era-specific tweaks. Do those bog the game down? Are they easy to implement? Do they make the game feel more tailored/less generic?

    • @StatsScott
      @StatsScott ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sturat5166 Thanks. In retrospect this was clearer once I watched the game playthrough; wound up just watching the rules overview first. That aspect was a nice mechanic of reflecting harder to hit in cover without totally re-doing a separate mechanic to the main card approach.

  • @MourningConstitution
    @MourningConstitution 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @travisedwards9457
    @travisedwards9457 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did you ever adapt the game for Star Wars? I had that in mind before getting the book and then your video sold me on the idea. Just curious if you had any specific adaptations. Thanks! The review was great.

  • @robertdelaney4332
    @robertdelaney4332 ปีที่แล้ว

    I picked this up a few months ago but haven't played it yet. I also grabbed one hour wargames. No card action but still fast and easy

  • @Vlad65WFPReviews
    @Vlad65WFPReviews 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm wondering how these rules handle cover, range or any other standard modifiers for the opposed card draw. If you are in a "hard cover" building, do you get to draw more than one card? Or if the shooter has a special skill or weapon - does he get more cards or other modifiers? Interested to know - thanks for the review.

    • @Carl-MGR
      @Carl-MGR 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There’s soft cover (draw 2) and hard (draw 3). And yeah, there’s tons of customization for special units.

    • @Vlad65WFPReviews
      @Vlad65WFPReviews 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Carl-MGR thanks - I have ordered the book.

  • @SlotraceDK
    @SlotraceDK 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How big/small is the board they played on?

  • @rcspaintservice
    @rcspaintservice ปีที่แล้ว

    Will it fit 15mm miniatures? Are there rules for tanks and other vehicles?

  • @marcelfischer5864
    @marcelfischer5864 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In my oppinion combat resolution is not so positiv. With cards you create dependend events that shouldn't be dependend on each other.If you for example draw all kings for charakter A and B for defence, character C can't get it on his shooting.

  • @JacobHouser-uk5sv
    @JacobHouser-uk5sv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had get on him bout the star wars 😂

  • @MrFlyXwire
    @MrFlyXwire ปีที่แล้ว

    It's a pretty random-style game, with no rhyme or reason why one side is rockin', while the other side sits and acts like a rock (though good for beginners).

  • @ErnestoGluecksmann
    @ErnestoGluecksmann ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where is everybody?! Lol.

  • @rccarguy3696
    @rccarguy3696 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was an excellent review! Thank you! 🫡