Inergen versus FK 5-1-12 test

Watch this test between two fire suppression systems: Inergen and FK 5-1-12. We'll be examining their performance under identical conditions to see which one truly stands out in terms of visibility, turbulence, and fire extinguishing speed.
Setup Explanation:
Our test setup includes a controlled fire source, identical enclosures for both tests side by side.
FK 5-1-12 Test:
s we initiate the FK 5-1-12 system, notice the visibility inside the enclosure. The dense discharge creates significant turbulence, making it hard to see and potentially complicating evacuation efforts in a real-world scenario.
Although FK 5-1-12 manages to extinguish the fire, observe the time it takes and the conditions it creates.
Inergen Test:
Now, let's see how Inergen performs under the same conditions. Pay close attention to the visibility and turbulence inside the enclosure.
Unlike FK 5-1-12, Inergen maintains much clearer visibility and generates significantly less turbulence, providing a safer environment during an emergency.
Remarkably, Inergen extinguishes the fire much faster, demonstrating its superior effectiveness in fire suppression.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while both systems are designed to suppress fires, Inergen outperforms FK 5-1-12 in critical areas such as visibility, turbulence, and extinguishing speed. This makes Inergen a more reliable choice for ensuring safety and efficiency during fire emergencies.
For more information feel free to contact us fire-eater.com
[e-mail]

[@rondo122]

Completely irrelevant test, in the wrong conditions, as a FK system would always be designed with a faster detection and thus faster extinguishing. Proof is the multiple approvals of FK systems in many different applications. Unlike for example aerosols. Sad that a company like Fire Eater is badmouthing the competition instead of pointing to the quality of their own products.