@matty kelly youre never safe. Even if your camp is only accessable by plane. You think a fire cant be seen from the air?...in this world its very hard to hide.
Its just a sentence to show how simple it is and let me tell u it is that simple ! Plus theres other reasons to make it longer . Being present in a country costed 2 buildings with 100 floors and many lives , thats enough to tell how important it was , doing it in one month and say chao ?!
Correct. 17 year of fighting al qeada, isis, Taliban, etc....These are Terrorists. It took us about a month to topple the actual Iraqi regime ran by Saddam Hussein. This would be the actual Iraqi government/regime. I hope you understand the difference now.
@MoneyPit Jku Wrong!! Obama did the same by ordering those thousands of drone strikes and ordering the death of Bin Laden. He was able to because he was Commander in Chief
Mike Eads He is a foreign general of a country we are not at war with, that’s an act of war. If Iran killed our general we’d declare war in a heartbeat. I’m sick of people acting like America has special privileges, we aren’t the world police.
@@brock985 he was a very known terrorist that was a general of a foreign country. There will always be a War on terrorists, Kill them before they kill us. Pretty simple.
@@michaelshattuck1874 Dude, I'm in California where Biden supposedly beat Trump by 4 million votes yet 4 republicans on the same ticket won their seats for the first time in decades. Did 4 million people only vote Biden and nothing else down the ticket? Or did 2 million of them vote Biden but then (R) down the ticket? Because that's the only way that happens.
no, you're retired. Lots of people leave the CIA even mid-career. They might keep their mouths shut about old info but they lose all access to new stuff. I know.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Quit trying to make it sound all Conspiracy Theory. It's just another fucked up gov't organization like the FBI, DEA, IRS, etc.
Half of what Soleimani has done as far as having missiles shot at Israel and wanting as much blood as possible from Americans and more so to Israel is because the CIA and Mossad took out his favorite circle jerk partner Imad Mughniyeh. Unless you don't knows how all the players are that was the Tony Soprano of Hezbollah. He had the Lebanon CIA Station Chief killed, architect of of the Beirut bombings, etc., etc. etc. Mugniyeh had more American blood on his hands at the time. Soleimani fought with the U.S. to defeat the the Taliban and when Iran was labeled a state sponsor of terror he started equipping Iraqi's to lay IED's in Iraq. Fuck both those guys. There is a Special place in hell for both of them! Mugniyeh was taken out by a car bomb in Damascus! Now his son who he named Jihad pops up every now and then. Bush gave the order to take out that Hezbollah dip shit and there was a little backlash from it. I'm a Veteran and Obama pulled us out of Iraq when the then Iraqi PM was telling us to lay off the Qud's in Iraq that were financing our death. It got really creative then. Assad emptied his jails of all Islamic nut jobs in 03 to come and fight the U.S. and when we pulled out they went back to Syria and formed ISIS! His father was anti Saddam and probably would've done the same if we went all the way to Baghdad. During the Persian Gulf War the SAS team Bravo two Zero trying to take out Scuds was running for Syria. One got out through Syria. So basically we had to go back and fight aside the Iraqi's to liberate the same cities so many Americans gave their lives to take. I'm a Libertarian now as a Civilian. I will say Clinton didn't have the balls to let Americans go kill or capture Bin Laden because of Somalia. So basically he allowed Bin Laden to arm Somali's, bomb 2 American embassies, and the first World Trade Center attack, the USS Cole and Tony Blair was the main reason the US was involved in the Former Yugoslavia where a genocide against Muslims was taking place. Where we said never again afte WW2.He went in front of Congress, not Clinton. I like blow jobs also so I can't blame the guy for getting head when Newt shut shit down. Obama would've been a hero if he killed Soleimani! Trump did and the New Left lost their shit because he listened to his Generals and used Intel to kill him. Trump is pulling troops out of these long ass wars, and killing instrumental people while Congress is basically yanking one of his balls. He is an ass but imagine if they worked together? Sorry about the rant I got excited.
He means the total dismantling of the military. Afghanistan is propping up a weak government after regime change. Remember Desert Storm? What we did to Saddam's military in two days, could now be done to Iran's in one. Trump won't allow a regime change/occupation quagmire. But that doesn't mean he won't use the stick.
Jono Arnold your comment is a low iq comment. The war with Afghanistan was done in less than a week. We spent years occupying with their new government’s cooperation to bring stability and protect Afghanistan and other allied middle eastern countries like Israel from terrorist
@@swapnilkulkarni800 Nobody told them to start wars. Nobody told people to hate each other. If they stop terrorist attacks, cool. But the word "terrorist" has become very loose and I feel like at some point they just do what gets their government the most income.
@@GenesisAntittymatatanmpo ya I am not saying they are all good but they are still necessary. Yes they can do better but corruption always finds its way no matter which generations it is or what field it is. I only had problem with his statement because he painted them like some kind of cartoon villain it's much more complex than that
@@swapnilkulkarni800 the self proclamed cowboys of the world, can decide the fate of goverments, lifes, countries. When usa goes down, because every empire goes down, history will know that they are worst that germany and the soviet union convined. You know what the "terrorists" wants? for your fucking johnny guns to get the fuck outta their countries, TO LIVE IN PEACE
@ Seems like that's all they've been for awhile now. Do I believe that majority of the men and women that work for the CIA have the beat intentions, yes. But like everything else, when politics is involved, it all goes to shit.
@ How, I thought their was a political uprising against their secular government, was their not?Why would american agencies help topple a democratic, secular government with a thriving economy?It doesn't make much sense to me.
@@jarhead21100 What for? They only run the entire world, are behind every war, and routinely murder children in the stolen land they live on. I don't get why that upsets people. The holy book they wrote says they get that land, so, case closed.
@@danarsarkawt2694 cmon really? Saddam was gassing his own citizens on a regular basis. If that’s humanity then it needs to be destroyed because that’s evil.
Or when he talked about Iran not wanting a strong Iraq in the Iran Iraq war, not talking about America supporting Iraq and supplying them with materials for chemical weapons
An had a democratically elected govt in the fifties. The CIA wanted their oil, killed their president and reinstalled a deposed monarch who would play American. I’m not impressed. It’s all theiving and crap.
not much knowledge it seems on Jo s part. the USA might overwhelm Iran in the first instance but the real fight begins when the guerrilla tactics start. And Iran is HUGE and ideal for that. Many casualties and a new "FOREVER " war. The military industrial complex is having a party
@@snakeplisken3497 At the same time, if the last 50 years has proven anything, no one 'has a clue about the middle east' in the entire country. Track record on 'knowing' about that entire region has been pretty piss poor so far, and probably even people in the middle east themselves are just as 'clueless'. Name one thing the so-called 'intelligent apparatus' has been correct on in regards to that region....
@@Arrogan28 You sir are correct. I have spent the vast majority of my adult life in the middle east and yes the US intelligence community is misguided to put it kindly....The issue has been for the longest time that they do not listen to the guy on the ground....(Same with politicians for various reasons)....The vast majority of "Intelligence" officers have very very little real world experiences and a very short supply of common sense. They often apply their values (US) and views (often left leaning believe it or not) as an overlay to the product they are analyzing. Too bad they still value crap degrees from whatever freakin school higher than real world experience and common sense / street smarts. They are not perfect as i have pointed out but in general they are at least some what correct. But the media....they act entirely in a bias manner, this can not be argued...and it is dangerous. I don't care who the president is or what ones political side is. What the "left" or "liberal" media is doing is not good for the US and they do not care. They do not have the intention to educate the public, they have the intention to cause geopolitical unrest to mislead, intimidate, demoralize, or otherwise influence the thinking or behavior of the people....or in other words, Psychological warfare. Maybe for monitary reasons, or maybe because they just cant stand that the world doesnt conform to their ways.
I'm guessing the only reason that this CIA guy is on here is coz he's burnt out and has the lowest of low security clearance. Why would they let an ex CIA agent with any kind of pull or whatever go on Joe Rogan if he had anything interesting to say... I've noticed whenever Baker comes on JRE he says a lot without saying a great deal at all really
I'm from Australia and our counterpart to the CIA (ASIS) - even an ex - ASIS agent wouldn't be able to go on any sort of tv show or whatever and talk about ANYTHING regarding to his previous job...
@@jeannettecampbell1402 i understand what your saying but he is not talking about the things he's done he's just giving his opinion on world issues. Hearing a guy whos viewpoint is shaped from years of insider knowledge is very interesting and credible considering he's been involved unlike most people who's opinion is based on limited information from the media. When he does talk about his experience it isnt anything that's still confidential and would have any consequences. He's not exposing anyone or giving away any secrets. If he was discussing things that were top secret then it would be in issue
Former CIA agent or not... when you are THAT confident on a subject that clearly has so much nuance to it, it makes me doubt your judgment. Plus, yeah, right, everything will be over in an evening... fool me once, fool me twice...
This guy is basically wrong about everything. He's so wrong I can't help but wonder what his area of expertise was supposed to be. My understanding is that it's pretty well understood that fighting and invading Iran would be a nightmare just based their geography and 1980s equipment.
I couldn't watch it. I just clicked off at around 2 minutes, and looked for comments to take the bad taste away... This guy believes - well, 'believes' - that Iran is the single greatest sponsor of terrorism *in the world*? Not maybe the Saudis? Or maybe the Russians? Or even the Afghans? Or maybe those who supplied the various Saudi and Afghan terrorists for nearly half a century? (Now, who was that again??) Nope, it's a small-to-middling sized (and democratic) country (with lots of oil), which has never attacked anyone else in modern history. (And there's a lot wrong with Iran, but military aggression isn't it)... This guy gives idiots bad name. 'We' effectively lost in Iraq, which barely even had an army, and America was beaten by angry civilians instead - but we'd easily defeat Iran, which has some of the most highly-trained and motivated soldiers in the Middle-East, if not the world (including quite effective special forces, and the ability to call upon some powerful allies). You're right, of course - the big worry is that people as ignorant or dishonest as this are allowed to 'serve' in intelligence. Really, it's doubtful if they should be allowed to leave the house without a nanny. Staggering...
@@Microtherion it's pretty weird. I suppose he's talking about if we just let lose on Iran, ruthlessly nuked everything with ICBMs and cruise missiles, perpetrated a holocaust on women and children, and scorched the earth. We all know that kind of war is not in the cards, though. Even if it was, it's insane and would amount to a pyrrhic victory for the US. It's funny, a few years ago, I used to play table top games with a reservist naval officer. He told me why invading Iran is very unwise, based solely on a military level, and he made it seem like anyone with a cursory military education would know this. I just found an article recently written on the topic that's pretty good: nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-geography-would-doom-any-invasion-iran-112111 So what is this bonehead CIA agent saying? It's not just this topic, throughout the interview, he's so wrong about stuff it borders on bizarre. John Kariakou, a former CIA agent who blew the whistle on the Bush torture program, talks in his book about working with analysts in the CIA who sucked and were just lame as hell. People who had no idea what was going on. Makes me wonder.
@@wolfumz Yes... The nearest explanation I can bring to mind is that the CIA and similar 'intel' agencies (and oxymorons) are bound to put considerable emphasis on 'commitment'. That's necessary, but you'll rarely get truly iron-clad (unquestioning) commitment from anyone intelligent, so they must be constantly trading off between intellect and commitment. There's also a tendency to draw predominantly on the kids of the mega-rich, and this tendency has only increased recently. If they do that, it's sheer pot-luck whether they get a savvy, insightful princeling or a spoilt and entitled non-entity who can barely tie his shoe-laces. (Many of these same frustrations are apparent in Michael Scheuer's books). In this case, they evidently found someone who speaks with great confidence, and indifference to whether what he says is even superficially credible. That says 'commitment', for sure - just not in a good way...
@@crazycat1232 Thanks! Actually, one little confession - I'm British, not American. We have to 'keep an eye' on whatever's going on (or usually off) in America though. It's like: we're on your side, fellas - why aren't you? :)
@@Scubuah Tell you both what, how about you guys show me proof he wasn't a terrorist and didn't kill thousands? He's been classified a terrorist since the Bush administration and Obama's as well. Just none of them did anything about it.
The military industrial complex has made sure there hasn't been a war in most of Europe since ww2. If the US leaves, Europe will be back at it again as it has for thousands of years.
Orionide no there fucking won’t, have you ever even been to Europe? They aren’t about to start killing each other outside of the balkans and Northern Ireland
Military complex. That’s funny. No he drank the Kool-Aid of not letting a government that just wants to make Aurora’s wear burkas, and kill individuals that don’t share the belief. Aurora read a book of any kind sometime. If that’s not worth your time fly to Iran and tell them you want peace not war.
The sad truth is Bush always intended to overthrow Saddam in '91 but we he got worried after the American media and antiwar movement and European countries began to accuse the US of war crime because of the TV images on the "Highway of Death". Bush lost his nerve and ignored his generals because he was worried about his reelection. America has the greatest form of government in the world but there are countless examples of our leaders doing things that are politically expedient even if they know it is the wrong thing to do. Situations like this are the result of being beholden to a fickle and often uneducated voting public.
People trip cause trump droned 9 people. Obama dropped over 21,000 bombs and noone said a thing. So far as I know, most people didnt even know he did it
Because Obama did it, gives trump the right to do it. I don't support Obama either. Fear isn't respect, people fear trump's ignorance. You want to call Obama out. That's cool with me, but if you can't call your own out. Then you're truly no better than the others.
@@charlesledbetter907 I think we all agree on that. I certainly do. We just use that as an example because noone was saying this stuff until Trump did it. I would hazard a guess that if Obama did the stuff Trump has been doing (the trade deals, tariffs, droning this guy, extending the olive branch to Korea and Russia) he would be idolized more than he already is. For instance this stuff about Trump separating the Mexican kids from families and putting them in Institutions that hes being lambasted for is wrong. Certainly deplorable. However Obama was doing the same thing and noone said a word. As a matter of fact Trump decreased the frequency in which it's done. Then Democrats wanted to use something they institutes against him. Obama dropped over 21,000 missiles and started 4 new wars and noone batted an eye. Obama... the way he conducted himself, walked and talked is what you want in a president but his policies were terrible. He was selling us. China didnt even greet him coming off the air force one. That's how much they didnt respect him. Say what you want, but they respect us now. So much so theres a large democracy movement in China right now where people are carrying Trump signs and marching the streets KNOWING that they could die for it. They greet him off Airforce one. Trump drones one guy (ended up 9 people died) AFTER they killed a bunch of contractors whom the guy was responsible. And everyone is saying he is a warmonger. Even people in Iran (whom I talk to through YT, FB, Quora, and Reddit) are happy that guy is no longer with us. Once again, it doesnt make it right, but all were asking for is people to be consistent with criticism cause it doesnt seem to be the case. Ot really looks like people dont mind about policies. Everyone like Obama so he literally got away with murder. People dont like Trump so every little thing is picked apart. And it seems like people aren't exactly criticizing most of his policies they just dont like the person. They dont care that we had a financial collapse under Obama. And they dont care that our economy is thriving and now were completely on foreign oil now, so much so, were exporting it. Lastly, I think were messed up for a lot of things but reguardless of party let's criticize equally.
@@adamburdt8794 I'm not going to get into it with you, and I don't want to argue. I am one of those people who think the presidents are just puppets and that our vote does not even matter. The reason for all of this (me writing) is how the fuck is Donald Trump (I can't fucking stand him and I think he's a fucking idiot, just my opinion and I'm not here to argue with you) the president of the United States of America. Also shit like Arnold Schwarzenegger, and I think it was Ronald Reagan who was the movie star even in politics. It absolutely boggles my mind, I thought politicians were supposed to be like life long job type shit. It seems like anybody could be a politician as long as they have money and it gives me less faith in the government and our political system, I'm kind of sad.
Are you daft? If we just want to obliterate the military and infrastructure we could no problem. We tried to stabilize and restructure the government of Iraq.
I believe hes referring to having the capability of destroying the majority Iran's offensive capabilities in 1 night. US military has claimed they could destroy 90% of north Korea's military in 12 hours.
Trump has tried to bring the troops home multiple times from Iraq and Afghanistan however, both Democrats AND Republicans banded together to block it everytime. Get rid of the neo-cons of both parties. No more fake wars, no more sending our bravest men and women to die for people who couldnt care less.
hEAtOniK you do realize that the metal in the WTC buildings only had to get hot enough to become unstable and bend, right? A structure holding thousands of tons of weight don’t have to melt to collapse...
@@CRussell110 Yup, and I actually served in the wars that followed so...there ya go. Politics came into play all the time in 4 combat tours with the Army
Travis Barney I think that’s very fair, and people should realize at the end of the day, the most important thing for the president is leading the country, not his own appearance
Michael McMillian no there was a law passed after 9/11 to give the president the authority to act in this matter. Before that presidents couldn’t just say yea go ahead and kill that guy there I don’t like his beard.
@@mehrshadvr4 which is within a presidents power. Declaring war is Congress' prerogative but military action is the Presidents. Do you remember the Korea War? That was never a declared war by congress and was the president exercising his authority unilaterally.
I've been around enough retired government agents to know that while they are smart people, they always toe the line even in retirement. To be a government agent you are strictly vetted to ensure your views line up precisely with the governments. Hardly any stray from that.
@The Catmotherother than for oil and gas reserves, israel to maintain dominance in Middle East, keep taking billions in taxpayer money to fund unneeded wars and to creat profits for defense contractors, war is profitable
The left should be the main group pushing the U.S. into the middle east... imagine a group of retards proclaiming they're about gay rights, human rights, womens rights, anti racism, anti bigotry, anti slavery and at the same time they suck the asshole of the middle east which is guilty of everything they stand for. Other than authoritarianism and absolute government control/power. Maybe they leave them alone because they have those things going for them and the left respects it?
@@comaodinsson3893 That's why the US sides with the biggest religious extremists, and attack the nations with more secular populations... right? A bit of misery and financial collapse will get them back to the mosques.
@@comaodinsson3893 its not in America though. Your country shouldn't have free reign to decide who lives and who dies in other countries whenever it pleases you. Its funny how you always seem to pick countries in the Middle East, rather than go for other tyrant leaders in other parts of the world, like Mugabe of Zimbabwe or Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia, who were allowed to commit war crimes for decades. Then once you're finished bombing the shit out of these countries you wonder why many become radicalised and blow themselves up to kill a few troops
@@comaodinsson3893 Just look at photos of all these Middle Eastern countries during the 1950's and 1960's before the overthrow of Mossadegh in Iran by the CIA, or support of the mujahadeen in Afghanistan etc... - no black bags for women. The USA sided with religious crazies in the Middle East because otherwise the secular socialists would have taken over. The Iraqi Baathists under Saddam were secular. Assad? His government is secular... women are unveiled if they want to be etc... , though those CNN reporters had to dress in bags to interview the "moderate rebels" the US was supporting. And Iran? That regime is certainly conservative and religious, though the people aren't any more than anywhere else - young women don't wear veils these days (unless they want to virtue-signal to the regime), and Iranians have always been big drinkers eg. the name "Shiraz" is associated with wine because of that heritage - we Australians stole the name for our wine for a reason. The mullahs certainly banned drinking, but the people never stopped just like the USA during prohibition.
@Toori Baba sad but true. Eisenhower tried to warn us about the M.I.C, but as long as American keep sipping that "imperialistic-patriotism" bullshit it will keep getting trillions😥😢😭
@@phalspar Joe asked how can he do that ?(reference to killing soleimani) It is simply me wrapping up an answer in those lame comments I never understood people made quoting Joe. I never intended it to be funny. Have a great day.
@@HumanoidCableDreads doesn't mean he can't keep pushing their bullshit propaganda lol calling Iran the #1 sponsor of terrorism just gives him away as a neocon ass kisser
@@HumanoidCableDreads You can't actually be this naive. An "ex CIA guy running a market research company" is EXACTLY what it looks like when the CIA runs a disinformation campaign.
@@randomstuff7742 - he was a general of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard. His function was comparable to a CIA Director or at least one of their functions. He seemed to also have a political function but I'm not that knowledge about the man himself.
Iranian General does war crimes. Trump takes him out. Media says General's an austere religious scholar. CIA public relations lobbyist squashes that claim.
Regime change and guerilla warfare are completely different to a confrontation between standing armies with the intent of blowing up a nation and making sure not even a lizard could survive in the country.
@@mattmarzula "nation building" gtfoh. Where was the nation building in Afghanistan? They just left as soon as Iraq needed some troops. The one road that went intercity in Afghanistan, which was important for transportation and infrastructure, didn't get finished because your warmongering army prioritized starting another war. There is no nation building if an Army walks into a country, with biased reasons, kills a bunch of leaders and leaves the rest up to the people.
Killing someone in a foreign nation that you're not currently at war with via drone strike is not something to be normalized or excused. Reminds me of _Rogue Nation_ by Clyde Prestowitz. Well worth a read, if you haven't already.
If you know some history of the Middle East you can tell that this is just an exposé of the American point of view of the conflicts there. Not everything he said was wrong but « the us are building a stronger Irak and Soleimani didn’t want that» common guys we can’t fall for this shit
Hi Joe, love your show, heard you say they hit outside the bases. I am an air traffic controller here at Al Asad, Iraq and they definitely hit inside the base. They blew up most of our air assets ops centers, and hit very close to living quarters which is why some people suffered TBIs, concussions and blown ear drums. We actually don’t think they were trying to miss, as we had 6 more coming that didn’t make it. :/
That was just disinformation. If we acknowledge they were trying to target us then we don’t respond it will makes us look weak as hell. - BUT UNDERSTAND THEY Iranians KNEW THEY HAD TO RESPOND SOMEHOW TO CALM DOWN THE IRANIAN PEOPLE. THOSE PEOPLE WORSHIP THERE MASTERS FOR SOME REASON. SO THEY DEMANDED A RESPONSE. SO THEY MOST LIKELY TARGETED SMALLER BUILDINGS TO KILL A SMALL AMOUNT. Since we only killed 5-10 when we targeted the generals car.
Everytime we've fought a military in the Middle East we've defeated them in record time. There is no WW3 if the enemy army no longer exists. The reason we didn't leave Iraq is because we started fighting the armed populace, after we had already won the "war". The US military should abandon any pretext of being a policing force to stabilize the ME. The local populace doesn't want to be given freedom, they don't want their oppressors overthrown, they just want to wallow in their ignorance. Leave them to it. If a nation threatens the US or it's allies, or proves itself a direct threat to commerce like Iran has, take steps to correct the issue peacefully, then destroy their nation militarily and move on.
@Jumpin Freedom is a strong word coming from someone defending a system that imprisons and tortures people that inform the public about the shady things the government does. Is the Iranian regime autoritarian? Yes. Would the USA invade Iran to bring them "freedom"?absolutely not. Nor did the US invade Iraq or Afghanistan to bring the people freedom. Both wars were stupid and cost the lives of thousand of people(americans and local). If you're thinking you're a patriot because you defend your government in whatever they do, I got bad news for you.
@CalvinSomething a World War isn't called a world war because it is between 2 countries but many countries across the globe. And a war in Iran would result in a WW3 because it wouldn't be just Iran but also Syria, Russia, Lebanon, probably China at some point, North Korea and maybe other states on one side and the NATO on the other. So, no, it wouldn't be a matter of a day or a week. Even if it would be just Iran. Iran has a much better aerial defense system than Iraq had for example. In the end the USA would overthrow the Iranian government, sure. But it wouldn't be that easy and it would be just the start of guerrilla warfare. That is, if we are just talking Iran vs the USA. If we're talking WW3 it wouldn't be just Iran as stated.
@CalvinSomething yes, the likelihood if a ww3 is pretty low, especially because it would end in a nuclear winter, people that seriously believe that have no political knowledge.
Tactics are maneuvers in a battle space, strategy is large scope. They are discussing international political strategy. You're probably the type to get annoyed by people who say clips when they mean mags, so maybe get this one right.
North Korea ain't all that scary. I'm pretty sure Kim and all of his little friends would prefer to have their virgins right here on Earth in this life. Nobody is interested in becoming a martyr for the North Korean cause.
Silence Dogood ya? Remember how everyone was freaking out the exact same way with Korea when trump first became president and then he became the first president to ever step foot in North Korea and make a deal!😂 ya I remembered that too. Sorry all of you liberal retards already forgot all the good things trump has done
Lol he makes it sound like it would be a walk in the park. Iran’s landmass is 2.5 times the size of Texas, with 3 x the population of Texas. Iran’s topography is largely mountainous and has a very patriotic populace which would defend the homeland with the same fervour the Russians displayed against the Germans during WWII. To make matters even more difficult, Iran is geographically positioned where Russia and China will easily be able to provide all sorts of assistance and supplies to the Iranian resistance. This guy is nothing but a fool, but he’s right about it being over in a day because the US would realize it would have no choice but to institute a draft and begin force mobilization to the degree of which hasn’t been seen since WWII; the US public simply won’t accept that. I can’t picture Tyrone in Arkansas willingly agreeing to go get killed halfway across the world for the profits of the Military Industrial Complex.
Very well said. Although there is a large population in Iran who are "against" the Iranian regime, come war time, they will fight to defend their country. Iran is not Iraq. You hit the nail on the head.
Big words for a opinionated twist on what you think would happen, how do you know the population supports the Ayatollah first off? Research your well-formed words and it overwhelmingly shows the people inside of Iran welcome American inyerventionism against their radical terrorist-sponsoring government. Muslims don't agree with murder, Christians don't agree with murder, the only ones who actually agree with the suffering of innocent people are mentally unstable teenage Americans and those who already accepted radical extremist ideologies
Actually WW1 occurred for largely farcical reasons, The Tzar was shot, Austra wanted to strut, Germany said fine why not - we are cousins and such, Britain said this far or no further can't destroy an entire nation you're already colonising and opressing because your boy got killed, Austria (the elites / old boys club) said well we haven't fought in a while and were pretty good at it last we checked, plus our boy got killed so sure why not have a 'little' war to strut and stuff, Germany once again was like fine - cousins and such - also we do have an awesome army thanks to Mr Bismark > England and France were like...,....I guess we're really doing this. Fine. ----> And then we had WW1. Point is, we (Europe) turned a PR issue among 2 countries into an all out World War because it'd been a while since they'd had a full scale war, glossed over the horrors of the Napoleonic wars which weren't that far away and wanted to strut. It's pretty darn similar to what we have now. Now if you said the same about WW2, then yes I would be on your side. That was a war which you could clearly see coming.
Carlos Alba it’s just entertaining seeing him constantly stressing about it on a bunch of episode of the JRE lol.. he talks about a lot of stuff with people that is would freak the average person out, so to see him honestly stressing is funny lol
We are talking about the second most important person, structure-wise, next to the ayatollah. So the idea that we took out a foreign leader is insane.- Former CIA experts insight
I hate Obama, and his drone wars, but you're making one hell of a false equivalence. One was attacking a dictator's efforts against revolutionaries during the Arab Spring, whose only support had wavered, and whose sole reason for staying in power was the oil monopoly. The other was assassinating a beloved general (if albeit a likely terrorist, welcome to foreign politics) of an actual power, on an ally's soil for dubious reasons that lacked the support of the international community.
The only people who said nothing are the ones who are asleep (the sheep) and the lame-stream media. Anyone awake (people like me) have criticized both attacks and both Presidents.
CIA promotion of ISIS/Daesh to bring about occupation 2.0 of Iraq, Syria and Yemen has got Soleimani to be labeled the bad guy. That's how the mafia would call a righteous cop or a Judge
Gotta love how almost all of those things you've just stated are all incorrect. 1. Solemani was never in Iraq and fight, except during the time of the Iran-Iraq war. 2. The US isn't occupying Syria(Pretty hard to do with only 2500 soldiers, who's busy training the locales to be a effective fighting force). 3. Soleimani was killed due to him, organizing Hezbollah members to attack American serviceman.
Brandon Burge you are old enough to remember W uttering the “Mission accomplished” line a few months after the U.S invaded Iraq in 2003, right. He was on the deck of a carrier and wearing a flight suit, something the Donald couldn’t fit into.
I personally think the bombs in Iraq were a decoy. To make people think this is it as long as Trump behaves. I would expect something to happen within the continental United States. One thing 9/11 proved, was to take down the USA just hit it without military, and it will eat itself from the inside out. Dubya said in speech just after, that if this changed how Merkins lived, the terriers have won. At what point will the admittance that they won happen? The USA is now a prison, forget police, but prison state. I don't know if you can still find a video of Mission Accomplished as they at one point had edited the speech so it cropped the banner. ou afid the speech, and the one I saw showed it for about 2 seconds, but the original had the banner showing through the whole speech.
More honest and believable? Art bell was ALWAYS skeptical and asked the right questions. If his guest/caller was a weirdo, he'd call him out. Organize your thoughts before you shit them out of your ass
@@TheCarsonJohnnyShow Get some help dude. I meant what I said. Just cuz my opinion differs from yours doesn't make me wrong. That said, opinions are like assholes, except yours. You are all asshole. I was a big Art Bell fan. Listened to him ALL the time, and no, he was NOT "ALWAYS skeptical", nor did he "ALWAYS" ask the right questions. Perhaps you should get hold of yourself and have a nocturnal emission over it tonight.
Conor is a narcissist putting on an act, there`s nothing humble about him. He lied so many times in the extended interview with Ariel, he might be the new Dana. The only reason he's acting humble is because people got so pissed about him talking bad about Khabib’s family. He`s saving face and everyone is falling for it, what a great manipulator Conor is. I will give him credit for that. He is so good at making the fans believe whatever he wants them to believe.
@@doggydeeds right dude is playing nice and saying he is gonna be active. Bullshit he wants to pick big fights only. If the ufc said he had to work his way up to a title and tried to make him fight somebody he has no interest in he will bitch and quit
@@possession2 You are dreaming and living in a fantasy land. Are you going to house all of them, give them welfare, give Medicaid including mental health help, help with employment? Get out of your mommy's basement.
sneezer No it can’t. It would go into somebody’s pocket. It’s a drop in the bucket of a country of 350 million. Homelessness is mostly due to mental illness. Even many of the drug addicted have severe mental illnesses. Many had homes and families and the families couldn’t deal with their illness. I worked in the Mental Health field most of my life. In the old days, if someone was mentally ill, they kept them hospitalized until they got them stabilized. Found medications that worked and had follow up out patient therapy. Now, they hold the person for a day and let them go. Their families can’t handle them, especially if they are violent and they end up on the street. As a society, we really don’t care about these people. They don’t vote and the politicians lie about getting it solved.
Ahhh the fear of WW3, simpler times
Seems like they skipped that and went into economic crisis. Hunger is the next part of the plan.....
@matty kelly youre never safe. Even if your camp is only accessable by plane. You think a fire cant be seen from the air?...in this world its very hard to hide.
Stefan Cupovic not if your in the mountains 😁
@@CZE3 rambo style just go into the jungle
Right? Can we just go back to a good ole nuclear scare?
Just remember how the CIA treated Jason Bourne.
That was a movie not real life.u want real life lsd experiments on people, mk ultra, project paperclip etc
@@scoop1215 No it fuckin' happened! No lie
scoop1215 they made a movie about it, it was real
We were taught about Bourne in our history class, totally real
@JDCPA80 honestly I'll never forgive them for that.
You think trump said "he's fired" when he gave the order?
Too soon...
Lol hope so
😂🤣
He said it! He says that line every day! Takes a poop, " you're fired! "
@William Hedgepeth wit and humor is a big part of the reason he gets himself into trouble...
There is no "former" CIA agent.
Not until there dead
ok buddy
Yeah I don't fully trust anyone that works for any government too.
@@agilemonk3y109 all the former Cia agents can't talk about their previous missions and work. Look up the files, most Cia agents get killed.
ohhhkay PASCAL. 🙄
How many times can CNN be wrong before ppl turn that crap off?
Who do you watch?
You can't wake someone up that is pretending to be asleep.
isrrael kumiko anyone who is watching any single source is misinformed.
th-cam.com/video/40NGN5mN7Nk/w-d-xo.html cnn got it right when biden admitted US allies supported isis
@@Simi_gp RT AMERICA on youtube
It would be over in 1 night. Overwhelming superiority.
Gee, where have I heard that before?
( Iraq, Afghanistan, 17 years later.)
We defeated Saddam's government in about 1 month. Most of that time was spent driving across the desert.
@@CoryFalde175 Iraqi disent even had a functioning military...Iran on the other Hand!!!!
@@dimaermolenko98 what is the reason Iraq doesn't have a functioning military? They had one prior to 2003. Where did it go?
Its just a sentence to show how simple it is and let me tell u it is that simple ! Plus theres other reasons to make it longer . Being present in a country costed 2 buildings with 100 floors and many lives , thats enough to tell how important it was , doing it in one month and say chao ?!
Correct. 17 year of fighting al qeada, isis, Taliban, etc....These are Terrorists. It took us about a month to topple the actual Iraqi regime ran by Saddam Hussein. This would be the actual Iraqi government/regime. I hope you understand the difference now.
“I was shocked that the commander in chief of the United States military could order the death of an enemy” ok joe
@MoneyPit Jku He can and he did. POTUS killed the terrorist, not murder. Legally justified.
@MoneyPit Jku Wrong!! Obama did the same by ordering those thousands of drone strikes and ordering the death of Bin Laden. He was able to because he was Commander in Chief
Mike Eads
He is a foreign general of a country we are not at war with, that’s an act of war. If Iran killed our general we’d declare war in a heartbeat. I’m sick of people acting like America has special privileges, we aren’t the world police.
@@brock985 he was a very known terrorist that was a general of a foreign country. There will always be a War on terrorists, Kill them before they kill us. Pretty simple.
😂 as if America and Israel ain't been lighting up cats for 70 years.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." - CIA Director William Casey, 1981
Fast forward to December 2020, look at what is going on. 80 million people think Joe Biden is more popular than Barack Obama in 2008.
@@michaelshattuck1874 Dude, I'm in California where Biden supposedly beat Trump by 4 million votes yet 4 republicans on the same ticket won their seats for the first time in decades. Did 4 million people only vote Biden and nothing else down the ticket? Or did 2 million of them vote Biden but then (R) down the ticket? Because that's the only way that happens.
What sucks is being one of the few non-believers, ignorance truly is bliss!! Sigh!!!
Disinformation is usually targeted at enemy states you donkey
@@Connection-Lost Lol
Do you really think our votes count on a federal level?
There is no such thing as "former" CIA. You can retire but you're still CIA.
no, you're retired. Lots of people leave the CIA even mid-career. They might keep their mouths shut about old info but they lose all access to new stuff. I know.
Unless Hillary 'retires' you
You have no idea what you're talking about. Quit trying to make it sound all Conspiracy Theory. It's just another fucked up gov't organization like the FBI, DEA, IRS, etc.
Bullshit
Reminds me of.. Once a Marine always a Marine
Joe "I get too many nicknames in the comments" Rogan.
Andreas Hansen 👎🏼
Joe "James" Rogan?
Soleimani was on Obama's and Clinton's hit list. Only difference is....they were wise enough to not do it!!!!
Half of what Soleimani has done as far as having missiles shot at Israel and wanting as much blood as possible from Americans and more so to Israel is because the CIA and Mossad took out his favorite circle jerk partner Imad Mughniyeh. Unless you don't knows how all the players are that was the Tony Soprano of Hezbollah. He had the Lebanon CIA Station Chief killed, architect of of the Beirut bombings, etc., etc. etc. Mugniyeh had more American blood on his hands at the time. Soleimani fought with the U.S. to defeat the the Taliban and when Iran was labeled a state sponsor of terror he started equipping Iraqi's to lay IED's in Iraq. Fuck both those guys. There is a Special place in hell for both of them! Mugniyeh was taken out by a car bomb in Damascus! Now his son who he named Jihad pops up every now and then. Bush gave the order to take out that Hezbollah dip shit and there was a little backlash from it. I'm a Veteran and Obama pulled us out of Iraq when the then Iraqi PM was telling us to lay off the Qud's in Iraq that were financing our death. It got really creative then. Assad emptied his jails of all Islamic nut jobs in 03 to come and fight the U.S. and when we pulled out they went back to Syria and formed ISIS! His father was anti Saddam and probably would've done the same if we went all the way to Baghdad. During the Persian Gulf War the SAS team Bravo two Zero trying to take out Scuds was running for Syria. One got out through Syria. So basically we had to go back and fight aside the Iraqi's to liberate the same cities so many Americans gave their lives to take. I'm a Libertarian now as a Civilian. I will say Clinton didn't have the balls to let Americans go kill or capture Bin Laden because of Somalia. So basically he allowed Bin Laden to arm Somali's, bomb 2 American embassies, and the first World Trade Center attack, the USS Cole and Tony Blair was the main reason the US was involved in the Former Yugoslavia where a genocide against Muslims was taking place. Where we said never again afte WW2.He went in front of Congress, not Clinton. I like blow jobs also so I can't blame the guy for getting head when Newt shut shit down. Obama would've been a hero if he killed Soleimani! Trump did and the New Left lost their shit because he listened to his Generals and used Intel to kill him. Trump is pulling troops out of these long ass wars, and killing instrumental people while Congress is basically yanking one of his balls. He is an ass but imagine if they worked together? Sorry about the rant I got excited.
@@diavolos2939 you're*
"A war with Iran would be over in one night" He says. I remember the same thing was said about Afghanistan 18 or so years ago.
He means the total dismantling of the military.
Afghanistan is propping up a weak government after regime change.
Remember Desert Storm?
What we did to Saddam's military in two days, could now be done to Iran's in one.
Trump won't allow a regime change/occupation quagmire.
But that doesn't mean he won't use the stick.
Yea so as Vietnam
@Jono Arnold Amen.
Jono Arnold your comment is a low iq comment. The war with Afghanistan was done in less than a week. We spent years occupying with their new government’s cooperation to bring stability and protect Afghanistan and other allied middle eastern countries like Israel from terrorist
Indeed. We should just give them millions more to behave.
Besides Mike Baker pretending like he’s not still in the CIA and towing the company line I love listening to this guy
When this guy speaks I feel like I'm being slowly led down a long winding road that leads to a cliff of sheer rocks
Creative spin, but you're just playing pretend..
ADWill Create agreed
damn right brother or sister
creepy as shit.........
That's... Interesting
Y'all talking trash on Rogan but you still listening idiots
It’s like that Spider-Man meme of them pointing at each other
@MikeHunt They are that incompetent and that great at the same time?
@MikeHunt But they do stop terrorists attack at least be grateful for that. You get to live your life in saftey while they risk theirs
@@swapnilkulkarni800 Nobody told them to start wars. Nobody told people to hate each other. If they stop terrorist attacks, cool. But the word "terrorist" has become very loose and I feel like at some point they just do what gets their government the most income.
@@GenesisAntittymatatanmpo ya I am not saying they are all good but they are still necessary. Yes they can do better but corruption always finds its way no matter which generations it is or what field it is. I only had problem with his statement because he painted them like some kind of cartoon villain it's much more complex than that
@@swapnilkulkarni800 the self proclamed cowboys of the world, can decide the fate of goverments, lifes, countries. When usa goes down, because every empire goes down, history will know that they are worst that germany and the soviet union convined. You know what the "terrorists" wants? for your fucking johnny guns to get the fuck outta their countries, TO LIVE IN PEACE
5:29...it's a little crazy to hear a "former" CIA operative talk about pushing agendas🤔
Joe Schmo the CIA is so hypocritical its insane
@
Seems like that's all they've been for awhile now. Do I believe that majority of the men and women that work for the CIA have the beat intentions, yes. But like everything else, when politics is involved, it all goes to shit.
@About what, I'm curious?
@@christophermendez7372 former head Comey might be why. Hes so far left it befuddles the mind.
@ How, I thought their was a political uprising against their secular government, was their not?Why would american agencies help topple a democratic, secular government with a thriving economy?It doesn't make much sense to me.
Plot twist, WW3 started in 2001 and has been going strong for almost 20 years.
Underrated comment
Yup. The enemy even hates jews.
No WW3 started in 1991, when the globalist wanted the new world order. They started a war against humanity, without actually declaring war.
@@jarhead21100 What for? They only run the entire world, are behind every war, and routinely murder children in the stolen land they live on. I don't get why that upsets people. The holy book they wrote says they get that land, so, case closed.
@@danarsarkawt2694 cmon really? Saddam was gassing his own citizens on a regular basis. If that’s humanity then it needs to be destroyed because that’s evil.
Yea let’s just all believe the CIA guy. They’re such a reputable organization
I also heard from your mom
@The Catmother like your mum
The same cia that said Iraq had WMD, and bin laden n saddam were in cahoots?
Yea instead let’s believe a 12 year old who plays fortnite all day and makes memes on ww3 and shits on America cause its epic memes
@@drollyrancher7020 america shits on itself, it doesnt need help
Honestly, I don't fully trust anyone that works for *any* government.
Yep, they all collect checks from the same place
Even school teachers?
Ren Caelum Dude sure , but who can you trust these days ?
Ok mr anime profile picture who doesnt trust the government
@@papichai73 Ok boomer
The CIA have a very great track record in South America. Haha 😂 notice how he doesn't talk about this 😂
You mean their illicit drug dealing adventures?
Or when he talked about Iran not wanting a strong Iraq in the Iran Iraq war, not talking about America supporting Iraq and supplying them with materials for chemical weapons
That’s not the subject matter in this conversation!
tmklunk sorry which?
An had a democratically elected govt in the fifties. The CIA wanted their oil, killed their president and reinstalled a deposed monarch who would play American. I’m not impressed. It’s all theiving and crap.
Always ask a CIA agent how things really are. They have the best track record historically.....
stan smith seems pretty trustworthy on American Dad.
his right about solamani.
@@fluffyfingerz9777 no he's not
The people don't have a great track record either so fuck off.
What aspect of what he said was even remotely innaccurat? Please of god of knowledge, enlighten us peasants.
Joe "I don't have a clue about the middle east" Rogan
not much knowledge it seems on Jo s part.
the USA might overwhelm Iran in the first instance but the real fight begins when the guerrilla tactics start. And Iran is HUGE and ideal for that. Many casualties and a new "FOREVER " war. The military industrial complex is having a party
Joe "Victim of CNNs propaganda campaign" Rogan
@@janbeggebeen gained this knowledge via your many years in the middle east im sure....😂
@@snakeplisken3497 At the same time, if the last 50 years has proven anything, no one 'has a clue about the middle east' in the entire country. Track record on 'knowing' about that entire region has been pretty piss poor so far, and probably even people in the middle east themselves are just as 'clueless'. Name one thing the so-called 'intelligent apparatus' has been correct on in regards to that region....
@@Arrogan28 You sir are correct. I have spent the vast majority of my adult life in the middle east and yes the US intelligence community is misguided to put it kindly....The issue has been for the longest time that they do not listen to the guy on the ground....(Same with politicians for various reasons)....The vast majority of "Intelligence" officers have very very little real world experiences and a very short supply of common sense. They often apply their values (US) and views (often left leaning believe it or not) as an overlay to the product they are analyzing. Too bad they still value crap degrees from whatever freakin school higher than real world experience and common sense / street smarts. They are not perfect as i have pointed out but in general they are at least some what correct. But the media....they act entirely in a bias manner, this can not be argued...and it is dangerous. I don't care who the president is or what ones political side is. What the "left" or "liberal" media is doing is not good for the US and they do not care. They do not have the intention to educate the public, they have the intention to cause geopolitical unrest to mislead, intimidate, demoralize, or otherwise influence the thinking or behavior of the people....or in other words, Psychological warfare. Maybe for monitary reasons, or maybe because they just cant stand that the world doesnt conform to their ways.
This guy is totally honest and unbiased and no self interest.😂😂😂😂
"I liked Obama, I didn't like his policies. I don't like Trump, I like his policies." I can work with that.
Can't really picture this guy on the city streets helping the homeless.
@@LWLProductions yes
Once a spook, always a spook.
AJ S I only startled once. I startled no more
Careful.
@@michaelskelton18 🤐
What’s a spook
@@xUnMattched my whole life spook has been a racist term against blacks. Idk the context these people are using it in on the ops comments.
I think the problem is that he drank the “we need to stabilize Iraq” coolaid.
It was real life "Syriana". USA and Iran worked together to get rid of a trouble maker. Then pretend to be angry for the TV camera.
Kool-Aid. It's a brand name.
Literally no one gives a fuck
You know what Iraq needs to be stable? Camels and dates. America...not on list.
@CJ You know what would REALLY benefit the Arab world?
If Americans would leave them the F*&@ alone.
I knew Brian Regan seemed a bit fishy, but a CIA agent? Sheesh
Whatsup hank? I used to see your comments on andertons vids
"It's unclear whether the chargers against Brian Regan will lead to his execution."
I'm guessing the only reason that this CIA guy is on here is coz he's burnt out and has the lowest of low security clearance. Why would they let an ex CIA agent with any kind of pull or whatever go on Joe Rogan if he had anything interesting to say... I've noticed whenever Baker comes on JRE he says a lot without saying a great deal at all really
I'm from Australia and our counterpart to the CIA (ASIS) - even an ex - ASIS agent wouldn't be able to go on any sort of tv show or whatever and talk about ANYTHING regarding to his previous job...
@@jeannettecampbell1402 i understand what your saying but he is not talking about the things he's done he's just giving his opinion on world issues. Hearing a guy whos viewpoint is shaped from years of insider knowledge is very interesting and credible considering he's been involved unlike most people who's opinion is based on limited information from the media. When he does talk about his experience it isnt anything that's still confidential and would have any consequences. He's not exposing anyone or giving away any secrets. If he was discussing things that were top secret then it would be in issue
Former CIA agent or not... when you are THAT confident on a subject that clearly has so much nuance to it, it makes me doubt your judgment. Plus, yeah, right, everything will be over in an evening... fool me once, fool me twice...
This guy is basically wrong about everything. He's so wrong I can't help but wonder what his area of expertise was supposed to be.
My understanding is that it's pretty well understood that fighting and invading Iran would be a nightmare just based their geography and 1980s equipment.
I couldn't watch it. I just clicked off at around 2 minutes, and looked for comments to take the bad taste away... This guy believes - well, 'believes' - that Iran is the single greatest sponsor of terrorism *in the world*? Not maybe the Saudis? Or maybe the Russians? Or even the Afghans? Or maybe those who supplied the various Saudi and Afghan terrorists for nearly half a century? (Now, who was that again??)
Nope, it's a small-to-middling sized (and democratic) country (with lots of oil), which has never attacked anyone else in modern history. (And there's a lot wrong with Iran, but military aggression isn't it)... This guy gives idiots bad name. 'We' effectively lost in Iraq, which barely even had an army, and America was beaten by angry civilians instead - but we'd easily defeat Iran, which has some of the most highly-trained and motivated soldiers in the Middle-East, if not the world (including quite effective special forces, and the ability to call upon some powerful allies). You're right, of course - the big worry is that people as ignorant or dishonest as this are allowed to 'serve' in intelligence. Really, it's doubtful if they should be allowed to leave the house without a nanny. Staggering...
@@Microtherion it's pretty weird. I suppose he's talking about if we just let lose on Iran, ruthlessly nuked everything with ICBMs and cruise missiles, perpetrated a holocaust on women and children, and scorched the earth. We all know that kind of war is not in the cards, though. Even if it was, it's insane and would amount to a pyrrhic victory for the US.
It's funny, a few years ago, I used to play table top games with a reservist naval officer. He told me why invading Iran is very unwise, based solely on a military level, and he made it seem like anyone with a cursory military education would know this. I just found an article recently written on the topic that's pretty good:
nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-geography-would-doom-any-invasion-iran-112111
So what is this bonehead CIA agent saying? It's not just this topic, throughout the interview, he's so wrong about stuff it borders on bizarre. John Kariakou, a former CIA agent who blew the whistle on the Bush torture program, talks in his book about working with analysts in the CIA who sucked and were just lame as hell. People who had no idea what was going on. Makes me wonder.
@@wolfumz Yes... The nearest explanation I can bring to mind is that the CIA and similar 'intel' agencies (and oxymorons) are bound to put considerable emphasis on 'commitment'. That's necessary, but you'll rarely get truly iron-clad (unquestioning) commitment from anyone intelligent, so they must be constantly trading off between intellect and commitment. There's also a tendency to draw predominantly on the kids of the mega-rich, and this tendency has only increased recently. If they do that, it's sheer pot-luck whether they get a savvy, insightful princeling or a spoilt and entitled non-entity who can barely tie his shoe-laces. (Many of these same frustrations are apparent in Michael Scheuer's books). In this case, they evidently found someone who speaks with great confidence, and indifference to whether what he says is even superficially credible. That says 'commitment', for sure - just not in a good way...
@@crazycat1232 Thanks! Actually, one little confession - I'm British, not American. We have to 'keep an eye' on whatever's going on (or usually off) in America though. It's like: we're on your side, fellas - why aren't you? :)
He's probably right, but it's hard to hear a CIA bro call someone bloodthirsty & take it seriously...
Glad I’m not the only one in the comment section calling BS on Mike
Right, Salami was an innocent man....
@@Khay-77 And what proof do you have of that?
Dutspice he has heaps of proof bro heappps
@@Scubuah Tell you both what, how about you guys show me proof he wasn't a terrorist and didn't kill thousands? He's been classified a terrorist since the Bush administration and Obama's as well. Just none of them did anything about it.
Joe “ I suspect I disagree with my guest, but until I know more, I can neither agree nor disagree” Rogan
"One man's terrorist is another man's scholar"..... One of the most finite truths of the human condition.
This is not what the truth sounds like. I know that for sure.
Look at 5:22. Definitely a sign he’s not being truthful.
Mike Baker drank the kool-aid of the military industrial complex, but what more can we expect of a former CIA agent?
The military industrial complex has made sure there hasn't been a war in most of Europe since ww2. If the US leaves, Europe will be back at it again as it has for thousands of years.
Orionide no there fucking won’t, have you ever even been to Europe? They aren’t about to start killing each other outside of the balkans and Northern Ireland
Military complex. That’s funny. No he drank the Kool-Aid of not letting a government that just wants to make Aurora’s wear burkas, and kill individuals that don’t share the belief. Aurora read a book of any kind sometime. If that’s not worth your time fly to Iran and tell them you want peace not war.
This guy had a lot of blood on his hands.
Luckily he was taken out.
WRONG
So does Bush
Who, Joe?
US military has even more blood on their hands either directly or indirectly. Think from ww2-2019. Let alone the weapons americans produce
He says at 12:19 "nobody wants a military conflict'. Nobody, really?
Then why hasn't Congress allowed Trump to withdraw troops from the Middle East...it's almost like we always have to be in a war
@@amertvyy Gotta keep the proficiency up.
John bolton gets hard at the thought of war with iran.
Of course he lied, he opened his mouth.
Remember when Bush told the shia to rise up against Saddam and then left them to rot
They were supposed to rise up.
@@davecolvin7969 they did rise up
And then Saddam slaughtered them while the US watched
they rose up and gave iraq to iran.
The sad truth is Bush always intended to overthrow Saddam in '91 but we he got worried after the American media and antiwar movement and European countries began to accuse the US of war crime because of the TV images on the "Highway of Death". Bush lost his nerve and ignored his generals because he was worried about his reelection. America has the greatest form of government in the world but there are countless examples of our leaders doing things that are politically expedient even if they know it is the wrong thing to do.
Situations like this are the result of being beholden to a fickle and often uneducated voting public.
@@roryoliver6743 and when his son did it there were no accusations of war crimes and no Anti war movement
Joe "I was nervous" Rogan
Little does Joe know that Obama was a Johnny McTriggerHappy when it came to drone strikes
People trip cause trump droned 9 people. Obama dropped over 21,000 bombs and noone said a thing. So far as I know, most people didnt even know he did it
Because Obama did it, gives trump the right to do it. I don't support Obama either. Fear isn't respect, people fear trump's ignorance. You want to call Obama out. That's cool with me, but if you can't call your own out. Then you're truly no better than the others.
@@charlesledbetter907 I think we all agree on that. I certainly do. We just use that as an example because noone was saying this stuff until Trump did it. I would hazard a guess that if Obama did the stuff Trump has been doing (the trade deals, tariffs, droning this guy, extending the olive branch to Korea and Russia) he would be idolized more than he already is. For instance this stuff about Trump separating the Mexican kids from families and putting them in Institutions that hes being lambasted for is wrong. Certainly deplorable. However Obama was doing the same thing and noone said a word. As a matter of fact Trump decreased the frequency in which it's done. Then Democrats wanted to use something they institutes against him. Obama dropped over 21,000 missiles and started 4 new wars and noone batted an eye. Obama... the way he conducted himself, walked and talked is what you want in a president but his policies were terrible. He was selling us. China didnt even greet him coming off the air force one. That's how much they didnt respect him. Say what you want, but they respect us now. So much so theres a large democracy movement in China right now where people are carrying Trump signs and marching the streets KNOWING that they could die for it. They greet him off Airforce one. Trump drones one guy (ended up 9 people died) AFTER they killed a bunch of contractors whom the guy was responsible. And everyone is saying he is a warmonger. Even people in Iran (whom I talk to through YT, FB, Quora, and Reddit) are happy that guy is no longer with us. Once again, it doesnt make it right, but all were asking for is people to be consistent with criticism cause it doesnt seem to be the case. Ot really looks like people dont mind about policies. Everyone like Obama so he literally got away with murder. People dont like Trump so every little thing is picked apart. And it seems like people aren't exactly criticizing most of his policies they just dont like the person. They dont care that we had a financial collapse under Obama. And they dont care that our economy is thriving and now were completely on foreign oil now, so much so, were exporting it. Lastly, I think were messed up for a lot of things but reguardless of party let's criticize equally.
@@adamburdt8794 I'm not going to get into it with you, and I don't want to argue. I am one of those people who think the presidents are just puppets and that our vote does not even matter. The reason for all of this (me writing) is how the fuck is Donald Trump (I can't fucking stand him and I think he's a fucking idiot, just my opinion and I'm not here to argue with you) the president of the United States of America. Also shit like Arnold Schwarzenegger, and I think it was Ronald Reagan who was the movie star even in politics. It absolutely boggles my mind, I thought politicians were supposed to be like life long job type shit. It seems like anybody could be a politician as long as they have money and it gives me less faith in the government and our political system, I'm kind of sad.
The drone strikes has unfortunately escalated since Obama left office.
If you can take out Iran in one night. Why is The US still in Iraq 19 years later?
Are you daft? If we just want to obliterate the military and infrastructure we could no problem. We tried to stabilize and restructure the government of Iraq.
I believe hes referring to having the capability of destroying the majority Iran's offensive capabilities in 1 night. US military has claimed they could destroy 90% of north Korea's military in 12 hours.
Trump has tried to bring the troops home multiple times from Iraq and Afghanistan however, both Democrats AND Republicans banded together to block it everytime. Get rid of the neo-cons of both parties. No more fake wars, no more sending our bravest men and women to die for people who couldnt care less.
The longer the war the longer the military industrial complex keeps turning
“911 was an inthide job, juth look at building theven”
- Mike Tyson
*wath
6 out of the 10 commissioners on the 9/11 commission don't agree with own findings, that just says it all....
hEAtOniK lol ok...you might want to stay off the QAnon...
hEAtOniK you do realize that the metal in the WTC buildings only had to get hot enough to become unstable and bend, right? A structure holding thousands of tons of weight don’t have to melt to collapse...
@Terrence Odonnell what's your knowledge on building 7 sir?
I guess an ex-CIA, would actually say all this crap.
Iran has oil... lots and lots of oil.. Iran has natural gas..lots and lots of natural gas... hmmm...
Iran has less oil and NG than Syria, tmk.
CIA: People don't need to make this about politics
Comment Section: lets make this about politics
War is politics
WELL the CIA is prt of the government lol
@@kubaniski Is that how you felt after 9/11?
@@CRussell110 Yup, and I actually served in the wars that followed so...there ya go. Politics came into play all the time in 4 combat tours with the Army
@@TheBoxingCannabyte 3000 dead innocent Americans was political huh?
Really good at speaking a lot without saying anything.
Joe Rogan and his mythical “they”.
Thats a bit much on the jew comment dont ya think? This isnt 1930 you dumbfuck
Not "mythical" just "unnamed".
“I liked Obama but I didn’t like his policies. I don’t like Trump but I like his policies.”
Yes, that is a quote from the video.
Travis Barney I think that’s very fair, and people should realize at the end of the day, the most important thing for the president is leading the country, not his own appearance
Probably this guy also spouted in the past that Saddam had WMDs.
Donald Smith I’m still Trynna link Taliban to 9/11
Joe, thank you for your integrity through comedy and other media platforms. You rock and are appreciated bro.
Joe “austoore religious scholar” Rogan
Seriously. Austere is not a complicated word to use
Weed brain
Literally read this comment as Joe said it 😄😆🤣
James clark I’d be down to bet Joe is smarter than you and everyone who liked your comment.
Thank you shushanth swinderballs, very cool!
Every country acts in its own best interest. The reiteration of this makes me think this guy has an agenda
Well there is a reason why he is called the “Commander in Chief”
Michael McMillian no there was a law passed after 9/11 to give the president the authority to act in this matter. Before that presidents couldn’t just say yea go ahead and kill that guy there I don’t like his beard.
@@Voovooze Presidents coul always use Military Force even without a declaration of War. Even since Washington
@@Voovooze no law was passed to give president assassinate a foreign government. That was an act of war.
A real Rhodes scholar right here.
@@mehrshadvr4 which is within a presidents power. Declaring war is Congress' prerogative but military action is the Presidents.
Do you remember the Korea War? That was never a declared war by congress and was the president exercising his authority unilaterally.
I've been around enough retired government agents to know that while they are smart people, they always toe the line even in retirement. To be a government agent you are strictly vetted to ensure your views line up precisely with the governments. Hardly any stray from that.
Trump?. They do seem to remain true to caesar and satan.
That’s why he made it clear that he didn’t vote for Trump.
And this is the guy who said Oswald acted alone ...lol
Captain Charisma haven’t listened to the whole podcast, it’s a CIA man, I can only guess he’s dropping little bits of truth with a lot of bullshits
@The Catmotherother than for oil and gas reserves, israel to maintain dominance in Middle East, keep taking billions in taxpayer money to fund unneeded wars and to creat profits for defense contractors, war is profitable
@The Catmother I think "Blackhawk Down" is still on Netflix ...lol
From all the information I've seen, it does seem that Oswald acted alone.
@The Catmother because they pay off the left-wing Democrats with Blood Diamonds to keep things under wraps.
Get David Icke on!
Omg that would rival the Alex Jones show for sheer awesomeness. The memes alone would make it worthwhile! 🤯
OMG yes PLEASE.
That guy has a massive forehead.
He says “bloodthirsty terrorists” several times, like the WikiLeaks video doesn’t exist.
Huh
Will you elaborate and send link
@@chrisdell3472 no need elaborate, the video is called collateral murder.
After reading a bunch of comments like yours, my hope is restored in younger generation.
Spot on mate
....hey, Joe, Mike Baker's job at the CIA is called "case officer"....
I’m no liberal, and I say, the US should NOT BE in the Middle East.
The left should be the main group pushing the U.S. into the middle east... imagine a group of retards proclaiming they're about gay rights, human rights, womens rights, anti racism, anti bigotry, anti slavery and at the same time they suck the asshole of the middle east which is guilty of everything they stand for. Other than authoritarianism and absolute government control/power. Maybe they leave them alone because they have those things going for them and the left respects it?
@@comaodinsson3893 That's why the US sides with the biggest religious extremists, and attack the nations with more secular populations... right? A bit of misery and financial collapse will get them back to the mosques.
@@markp6621 Since when has the middle east been more secular? WTF are you talking about?
@@comaodinsson3893 its not in America though. Your country shouldn't have free reign to decide who lives and who dies in other countries whenever it pleases you. Its funny how you always seem to pick countries in the Middle East, rather than go for other tyrant leaders in other parts of the world, like Mugabe of Zimbabwe or Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia, who were allowed to commit war crimes for decades.
Then once you're finished bombing the shit out of these countries you wonder why many become radicalised and blow themselves up to kill a few troops
@@comaodinsson3893 Just look at photos of all these Middle Eastern countries during the 1950's and 1960's before the overthrow of Mossadegh in Iran by the CIA, or support of the mujahadeen in Afghanistan etc... - no black bags for women. The USA sided with religious crazies in the Middle East because otherwise the secular socialists would have taken over. The Iraqi Baathists under Saddam were secular. Assad? His government is secular... women are unveiled if they want to be etc... , though those CNN reporters had to dress in bags to interview the "moderate rebels" the US was supporting. And Iran? That regime is certainly conservative and religious, though the people aren't any more than anywhere else - young women don't wear veils these days (unless they want to virtue-signal to the regime), and Iranians have always been big drinkers eg. the name "Shiraz" is associated with wine because of that heritage - we Australians stole the name for our wine for a reason. The mullahs certainly banned drinking, but the people never stopped just like the USA during prohibition.
CIA is so honest asked him what that they have done all over the world...
@@jopo323 ask you mama
Cody Banks wooooow no one cares to read that
No wars today pal
Can we have a war on hunger and poverty?
@Toori Baba sad but true. Eisenhower tried to warn us about the M.I.C, but as long as American keep sipping that "imperialistic-patriotism" bullshit it will keep getting trillions😥😢😭
Exactly
Me Rodriguez we have one....how well has that worked out....God damn
Toori Baba what trillions?
And we already have had a war on poverty. Its been a failure. Give me a break.
Sullimany was an angel compared to the cia
So dam true!!!
No, no Angel. Just mother Theresa.
Not a very good comparison. Angels are pretty brutal, just read the Old Testament.
There are no angels
Joe "Commander in Chief of the United States armed forces" Rogan
Why do people still make these jokes they are so far from being funny.
@@forrestcoleman2828 I giggled at it.
jreg2007 you’re the only one
@@phalspar clearly 13 other people are also chuckling. you sad twat
@@phalspar Joe asked how can he do that ?(reference to killing soleimani) It is simply me wrapping up an answer in those lame comments I never understood people made quoting Joe. I never intended it to be funny.
Have a great day.
This guy is not straightforward about anything
Glass Zeraki typical CIA employee. Been conditioned to word things in a certain manner
maybe you just don't understand
The spook is lying??? You don't say....
A CIA trump supporter. Let's take what he says with a little skepticism.
@Mike Fitzpatrick That sounds ridiculous.
Mike Baker, working his PR desk position.
He runs a market research company, he does Rogan because he likes talking politics.
@@HumanoidCableDreads doesn't mean he can't keep pushing their bullshit propaganda lol calling Iran the #1 sponsor of terrorism just gives him away as a neocon ass kisser
@@UrineDeity the truth hurts, Fuck Iran
@@HumanoidCableDreads You can't actually be this naive. An "ex CIA guy running a market research company" is EXACTLY what it looks like when the CIA runs a disinformation campaign.
A Aizner so let me get this straight? The CIA is running “disinformation” by saying that Iran is a sponsor of terrorism ? Lol you can’t be serious?
In one sentence he said he was the second most important person in Iran and in his second sentence he said he wasn't a 'national' leader or general.
Cus he isn’t in the government he was more of a mob boss who had taken power
@@randomstuff7742 - he was a general of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard. His function was comparable to a CIA Director or at least one of their functions. He seemed to also have a political function but I'm not that knowledge about the man himself.
Iranian General does war crimes.
Trump takes him out.
Media says General's an austere religious scholar.
CIA public relations lobbyist squashes that claim.
Knifehand TV The “austere” comment was, I believe, leveled at al-Zarqawi.
Gerald Hawkins it’s al-Baghdadi, leader of isis
Trevor Noah left the room sobbing 😂😂
Trevor Noah is irrelevant.
"We can take them out in one night".
*Stares in 19 years in Iraq*.
Nation building isn't the same as "taking someone out".
Math...haha
RIGHT!????
Regime change and guerilla warfare are completely different to a confrontation between standing armies with the intent of blowing up a nation and making sure not even a lizard could survive in the country.
@@mattmarzula "nation building" gtfoh. Where was the nation building in Afghanistan? They just left as soon as Iraq needed some troops. The one road that went intercity in Afghanistan, which was important for transportation and infrastructure, didn't get finished because your warmongering army prioritized starting another war. There is no nation building if an Army walks into a country, with biased reasons, kills a bunch of leaders and leaves the rest up to the people.
This guy stumbles over his words more than any guest ever.
he is a super creep.
His lips moves faster than his brain
That just happens when you're lying through your teeths.
Yes let’s hear what the very credible CIA guy has to say. 🙄
@2good2be4gott you got really upset, try not to get triggered, you can tell you're triggered since you straw Maned him
@2good2be4gott probably a killer who talks about bad guys, someone hold him a mirror in his face
If he were saying the opposite people would be in the comments saying he is full of shit lol
Killing someone in a foreign nation that you're not currently at war with via drone strike is not something to be normalized or excused. Reminds me of _Rogue Nation_ by Clyde Prestowitz. Well worth a read, if you haven't already.
We've been doing it forever, not gonna stop anytime soon.
Killing iranian citizens for political beliefs was being normalized choose the lesser of two evils
10:00
"I was elected to lead, not to read. OPTION 4!"
I thought of the same exactly scene too
Wasn’t the end of the quote “NUMBER 3!!” Not option 4?
Mike Baker is a good story teller, and that’s about it.
@JimBobBek Hi
This guy sounds like he's lying
Iknow Allthesadsongs bro he is. Look at his body language.
Hes definitely bending the truth for sure.
He's reaching hard
If you know some history of the Middle East you can tell that this is just an exposé of the American point of view of the conflicts there. Not everything he said was wrong but « the us are building a stronger Irak and Soleimani didn’t want that» common guys we can’t fall for this shit
About what?...
Hi Joe, love your show, heard you say they hit outside the bases. I am an air traffic controller here at Al Asad, Iraq and they definitely hit inside the base. They blew up most of our air assets ops centers, and hit very close to living quarters which is why some people suffered TBIs, concussions and blown ear drums. We actually don’t think they were trying to miss, as we had 6 more coming that didn’t make it. :/
That was just disinformation. If we acknowledge they were trying to target us then we don’t respond it will makes us look weak as hell. - BUT UNDERSTAND THEY Iranians KNEW THEY HAD TO RESPOND SOMEHOW TO CALM DOWN THE IRANIAN PEOPLE. THOSE PEOPLE WORSHIP THERE MASTERS FOR SOME REASON. SO THEY DEMANDED A RESPONSE. SO THEY MOST LIKELY TARGETED SMALLER BUILDINGS TO KILL A SMALL AMOUNT. Since we only killed 5-10 when we targeted the generals car.
“It’ll be over in an evening” why do I feel like I’ve heard this exact same talking point before about a different middle eastern nation 😂
Everytime we've fought a military in the Middle East we've defeated them in record time. There is no WW3 if the enemy army no longer exists. The reason we didn't leave Iraq is because we started fighting the armed populace, after we had already won the "war".
The US military should abandon any pretext of being a policing force to stabilize the ME. The local populace doesn't want to be given freedom, they don't want their oppressors overthrown, they just want to wallow in their ignorance. Leave them to it. If a nation threatens the US or it's allies, or proves itself a direct threat to commerce like Iran has, take steps to correct the issue peacefully, then destroy their nation militarily and move on.
Jumpin Jehosephat Your logic is sideways. Anyways what is your opinion on Afghanistan?
@Jumpin Freedom is a strong word coming from someone defending a system that imprisons and tortures people that inform the public about the shady things the government does. Is the Iranian regime autoritarian? Yes. Would the USA invade Iran to bring them "freedom"?absolutely not. Nor did the US invade Iraq or Afghanistan to bring the people freedom. Both wars were stupid and cost the lives of thousand of people(americans and local). If you're thinking you're a patriot because you defend your government in whatever they do, I got bad news for you.
@CalvinSomething a World War isn't called a world war because it is between 2 countries but many countries across the globe. And a war in Iran would result in a WW3 because it wouldn't be just Iran but also Syria, Russia, Lebanon, probably China at some point, North Korea and maybe other states on one side and the NATO on the other. So, no, it wouldn't be a matter of a day or a week. Even if it would be just Iran. Iran has a much better aerial defense system than Iraq had for example. In the end the USA would overthrow the Iranian government, sure. But it wouldn't be that easy and it would be just the start of guerrilla warfare. That is, if we are just talking Iran vs the USA. If we're talking WW3 it wouldn't be just Iran as stated.
@CalvinSomething yes, the likelihood if a ww3 is pretty low, especially because it would end in a nuclear winter, people that seriously believe that have no political knowledge.
Joe ' I can't believe the commander in chief can make those decisions' Rogan
A lot of political and tactical experts in this comment section.
@David Whitfield NYOOOO IF UR NOT A POLITICIAN OR TACTICIAN YOU CAN'T TALK ABOUT STRATEGY!!!!111 WHAT THE FUUUUCKKKK BRROOOOO!!!!
yOu CaN't TaLk AbOuT pOlItIcS If YoU'rE nOt A pOlItIcIaN
Lol . was getting ready for my retaliatory rant against someone , and i read your comment,and i gotta laugh-very true.
Tactics are maneuvers in a battle space, strategy is large scope. They are discussing international political strategy. You're probably the type to get annoyed by people who say clips when they mean mags, so maybe get this one right.
@@Pozhinat Good job, you nerd.
How is this any different that all the other meddling we, the USA, have done since 1945? I'm more concerned about North Korea than Iran.
North Korea ain't all that scary. I'm pretty sure Kim and all of his little friends would prefer to have their virgins right here on Earth in this life. Nobody is interested in becoming a martyr for the North Korean cause.
how many Americans had Kim had killed vs whatever his name is? yeah
Melody Media Name 1 American Kim has killed? Don’t worry I’ll wait lol
Killa Beatz Are you still waiting? Lol
Silence Dogood ya? Remember how everyone was freaking out the exact same way with Korea when trump first became president and then he became the first president to ever step foot in North Korea and make a deal!😂 ya I remembered that too. Sorry all of you liberal retards already forgot all the good things trump has done
Please, get David Icke on your show. So many interesting topics to talk about. Would produce some great discussions.
He'd make Alex Jones seem sane
@TruthSeeker Soldier but, Lizard People...
Lol he makes it sound like it would be a walk in the park. Iran’s landmass is 2.5 times the size of Texas, with 3 x the population of Texas. Iran’s topography is largely mountainous and has a very patriotic populace which would defend the homeland with the same fervour the Russians displayed against the Germans during WWII. To make matters even more difficult, Iran is geographically positioned where Russia and China will easily be able to provide all sorts of assistance and supplies to the Iranian resistance.
This guy is nothing but a fool, but he’s right about it being over in a day because the US would realize it would have no choice but to institute a draft and begin force mobilization to the degree of which hasn’t been seen since WWII; the US public simply won’t accept that. I can’t picture Tyrone in Arkansas willingly agreeing to go get killed halfway across the world for the profits of the Military Industrial Complex.
Very well said. Although there is a large population in Iran who are "against" the Iranian regime, come war time, they will fight to defend their country. Iran is not Iraq. You hit the nail on the head.
Big words for a opinionated twist on what you think would happen, how do you know the population supports the Ayatollah first off? Research your well-formed words and it overwhelmingly shows the people inside of Iran welcome American inyerventionism against their radical terrorist-sponsoring government. Muslims don't agree with murder, Christians don't agree with murder, the only ones who actually agree with the suffering of innocent people are mentally unstable teenage Americans and those who already accepted radical extremist ideologies
USA > Iran. Go cry to your trans father.
Anyone who actually understands the details of why WW1 happened knows what a different scenario the Iran situation was.
Actually WW1 occurred for largely farcical reasons, The Tzar was shot, Austra wanted to strut, Germany said fine why not - we are cousins and such, Britain said this far or no further can't destroy an entire nation you're already colonising and opressing because your boy got killed, Austria (the elites / old boys club) said well we haven't fought in a while and were pretty good at it last we checked, plus our boy got killed so sure why not have a 'little' war to strut and stuff, Germany once again was like fine - cousins and such - also we do have an awesome army thanks to Mr Bismark > England and France were like...,....I guess we're really doing this. Fine. ----> And then we had WW1.
Point is, we (Europe) turned a PR issue among 2 countries into an all out World War because it'd been a while since they'd had a full scale war, glossed over the horrors of the Napoleonic wars which weren't that far away and wanted to strut. It's pretty darn similar to what we have now.
Now if you said the same about WW2, then yes I would be on your side. That was a war which you could clearly see coming.
@@dreamEternal
WW1 was the same. The pot had been boiling a long time by then, Franz getting shot was just the straw the broke the camel's back.
@@dreamEternal It's a bit more complicated than all that but i see your point.
James Brown
Iran isn’t dumb enough to start a full blown war with the US
@@dreamEternal I think Austria became a republic right after world war 1.
Joe reallyyyyyy is scared about this Iran situation LMAO
I think he's just aware that anything can happen. Who know's how any one country is gonna react to something drastic we do to them.
Scared ? No, but U all should be concerned.
Carlos Alba it’s just entertaining seeing him constantly stressing about it on a bunch of episode of the JRE lol.. he talks about a lot of stuff with people that is would freak the average person out, so to see him honestly stressing is funny lol
@@CFproductionsTV I mean you never know WW1 also started with an assasination. 🤔
Lol so true
Over in a evening, it’s not over after 18 years. Rules #1 don’t bite the hand that feeds you!
We are talking about the second most important person, structure-wise, next to the ayatollah. So the idea that we took out a foreign leader is insane.- Former CIA experts insight
What? The Iranians have admitted that the shooting down of the plane was a mistake by their forces.
That's central intelligence for ya
Can y'all smell the bs in the air?
Speaking bullshit is this guys specialty
Iran don't want none of these hands. 🥊🇺🇲🥊
We are good at blowing shit up but then what?
This guy is overestimating himself
Obama Bombs Libya back to the stoneage: Nothing
Trump Drones one dude: OMG WW3 GUYS!!
Who says advertising doesn't work?
Uh the "one guy" was like killing the US VP
I hate Obama, and his drone wars, but you're making one hell of a false equivalence. One was attacking a dictator's efforts against revolutionaries during the Arab Spring, whose only support had wavered, and whose sole reason for staying in power was the oil monopoly. The other was assassinating a beloved general (if albeit a likely terrorist, welcome to foreign politics) of an actual power, on an ally's soil for dubious reasons that lacked the support of the international community.
@@GuruJudge21 Thank you and Dan for proving my point
@@GuruJudge21 Obama killed a US citizen in a drone strike, who was underage
The only people who said nothing are the ones who are asleep (the sheep) and the lame-stream media. Anyone awake (people like me) have criticized both attacks and both Presidents.
He calls Iran the largest sponsor of terrorism and with no hint of irony.
@@notanotter Getting closer but it's not Saudi Arabia. They are friends with Saudi Arabia, however.
The US military is led by angels
Jose Munoz yeah fallen angels
Angels of death!
Because Jesus is all about world domination??
Wait, but the media mourned Suleimani as a great star among his people, like Elvis... so much TDS.
While people all over the Middle East celebrated his death. People in the Middle East refuses to walk on the American flag and Israel flag after that.
Soleimani fought ISIS and opposed the US occupation of Syria and Iraq. How terrible. /s
CIA promotion of ISIS/Daesh to bring about occupation 2.0 of Iraq, Syria and Yemen has got Soleimani to be labeled the bad guy. That's how the mafia would call a righteous cop or a Judge
Gotta love how almost all of those things you've just stated are all incorrect.
1. Solemani was never in Iraq and fight, except during the time of the Iran-Iraq war.
2. The US isn't occupying Syria(Pretty hard to do with only 2500 soldiers, who's busy training the locales to be a effective fighting force).
3. Soleimani was killed due to him, organizing Hezbollah members to attack American serviceman.
@Orcawhale:
1. Soleimani fought ISIS (check)
2. Soleimani protested US military presence in Iraq and Syria (check)
3. You're an idiot (check)
Sounds like "Mission accomplished."
Brandon Burge you are old enough to remember W uttering the “Mission accomplished” line a few months after the U.S invaded Iraq in 2003, right. He was on the deck of a carrier and wearing a flight suit, something the Donald couldn’t fit into.
I personally think the bombs in Iraq were a decoy. To make people think this is it as long as Trump behaves.
I would expect something to happen within the continental United States.
One thing 9/11 proved, was to take down the USA just hit it without military, and it will eat itself from the inside out.
Dubya said in speech just after, that if this changed how Merkins lived, the terriers have won.
At what point will the admittance that they won happen?
The USA is now a prison, forget police, but prison state.
I don't know if you can still find a video of Mission Accomplished as they at one point had edited the speech so it cropped the banner. ou afid the speech, and the one I saw showed it for about 2 seconds, but the original had the banner showing through the whole speech.
You mean that with the irony that we are still at war in that shithole for an additional 16 years after "Mission Accomplished"?
Joe was so clueless I'm glad someone explained it to him.
Terrible explanation from a right wing prospective
I am falling in love with Joe Rogan's shows. He reminds me a lot of Art Bell, only more honest and believable.
I too remember Art Bell!!
More honest and believable? Art bell was ALWAYS skeptical and asked the right questions. If his guest/caller was a weirdo, he'd call him out. Organize your thoughts before you shit them out of your ass
@@TheCarsonJohnnyShow Get some help dude. I meant what I said. Just cuz my opinion differs from yours doesn't make me wrong. That said, opinions are like assholes, except yours. You are all asshole. I was a big Art Bell fan. Listened to him ALL the time, and no, he was NOT "ALWAYS skeptical", nor did he "ALWAYS" ask the right questions. Perhaps you should get hold of yourself and have a nocturnal emission over it tonight.
That is why most people call it the Washington Compost!
now that Conor is humble, he could be on JRE post fight on Monday.
Shut up already ya bitch 😂
Conor is a narcissist putting on an act, there`s nothing humble about him. He lied so many times in the extended interview with Ariel, he might be the new Dana. The only reason he's acting humble is because people got so pissed about him talking bad about Khabib’s family. He`s saving face and everyone is falling for it, what a great manipulator Conor is. I will give him credit for that. He is so good at making the fans believe whatever he wants them to believe.
@@doggydeeds alright arm chair physiologist
@@doggydeeds right dude is playing nice and saying he is gonna be active. Bullshit he wants to pick big fights only. If the ufc said he had to work his way up to a title and tried to make him fight somebody he has no interest in he will bitch and quit
@@Likeaworm loooool
“Or an extra sanction here or there”
Or you know, several billion dollars...
@@Sam-pie 20 billion a year can solve homelessness in the US.
Yeah but it is about Iran, not USA.. So a couple of billion is a lot of money for Iran
@@Sam-pie wrong.
@@possession2 You are dreaming and living in a fantasy land. Are you going to house all of them, give them welfare, give Medicaid including mental health help, help with employment? Get out of your mommy's basement.
sneezer No it can’t. It would go into somebody’s pocket. It’s a drop in the bucket of a country of 350 million. Homelessness is mostly due to mental illness. Even many of the drug addicted have severe mental illnesses. Many had homes and families and the families couldn’t deal with their illness. I worked in the Mental Health field most of my life. In the old days, if someone was mentally ill, they kept them hospitalized until they got them stabilized. Found medications that worked and had follow up out patient therapy. Now, they hold the person for a day and let them go. Their families can’t handle them, especially if they are violent and they end up on the street. As a society, we really don’t care about these people. They don’t vote and the politicians lie about getting it solved.
I never believe a word that comes out of this guys mouth.
I believe everything could be a trap, which is why I’m still alive.
29memyselfandi don’t because they are all CIA fed bedtime stories.
Notice at 5:22 how he scratches the left side of his face. That’s a sign he’s not being fully truthful.