First time I see someone playing the Original version (1838), S. 140 of these studies. Respect to the man, cause it's a crazy bet to do it live considering how crazy hard these pieces are. Way harder than their counterpart done 13 years later.
@@lunar.6091 when you say no. 3, I'm assuming you mean the first thing played in the video. The 1838 version is probably 2x harder, could easily be more than that. If you look at sheet music of it you'd understand. The jumps and just the intervals between the incredibly quick notes combined with the right hand playing seemingly three parts at once. The right hand in the friska of hungarian rhapsody no. 2 is comparable to the right one in this, although this one seems more difficult based on the fact it as to make bigger jumps/play more notes
@@lunar.6091 simply think that a good piano student after some years of hard work or a good prodigy after a few years of work could play the later one, and that less than 20 people played the first version in history
ppl talking about the etude 4, but nobody is talking about 3:29 of la Campanella the right hand jumps at that tempo is inhuman and the fact that he makes it sound so easy makes it even more astonishing on his level of technicality.
I have gained quite a recent obsession with the former s.140 No 4 and have noticed how many intriguing different manners of play it has and every one introduces a great alternative take as most who attempt this are already of a mouth watering proficiency in piano.
Incredible that besides the theme of the Campanella (Rondò from Paganini's Concerto no. 2), Liszt uses in the same etude the theme of the rondò of the 1st. Concerto (all the central part)
WOW, that's great!!! Until the moment I watched these 3 videos I thought it's impossible a human to play these etudes (without taking drugs :)). But this really surprised me amazingly. I don't know how much time he has prepared for these pieces, but the demonstates unhuman perfection.I wonder what was the purpose of Liszt to writing these etudes. It's good that he has revised them later.
Liszt probably wrote these for himself as showpieces. Realising that other people wanted to play them too, he made them easier as they weren't as good as him (or had smaller hands). Lol.
@@derekliu793 no, liszt can def play this faster than petrov, but he cant play 2 times faster than petrov. Liszt was a virtuoso bit he still was.. human. No human can play it that speed.
You know he is good when he is so relaxed he has the time and cool to adjust his glasses amidst all this chaos.. while i cant keep my shit together through Bach's BWV 911 fugue to save my life!! :) Flawless technique!! Outsanding playing!! (proceeds to throw the piano from the balcony of third floor...)
I really can't believe nobody is talking about no.3 ! Not only is it better than the revised version, but this interpretation here is the BEST one I've heard ever, not even Filipec's recording is as good as Petrov's here !
Great pianist in all senses, I adore his interpretations! That is perfection! Just listen to your piano and your sound will always live in that heart…maestro.
This is a much better version of La Campanella. How the other one got so well known over this one I have no idea. Both are good but this version is superior I think.
I agree completely, but I'd conjecture that this is less known because many fewer people can play it. Not because of a lack of technical ability in pianists (which can be developed), but in this, there are parts where your hands need to reach an octave and a half (which cannot be developed easily).
i believe that the other version is better. Especially the modern one is the one that i heard first. So this sounded weird to me. Anyway, i think this is not superior to the modern one.
no, not really actually... the version that Valentina Lisitsa plays is really good. Everybody seems to like it in the video :P But I'm not saying this is BAD or anything, I'm just saying that I don't really enjoy this version, apparently, the original one. Most pianist play the modern version, so I got influenced by it, and now I listen to it more.
He played the fourth etude in chordal arpeggios. It is the most difficult etude of Franz Liszt and one of the most difficult etudes ever written in the 19th century. Only Mereaux's "Bravura" can compare.
@@392023001 full tempo: th-cam.com/video/G5T7alRsW7E/w-d-xo.html (i think liszt himself could not play like that, he actually struggled with his own tannhauser overture)
There is no "real tempo". The original caprice is something like twice the speed, which would be absurd. 50-60 bpm is reasonable and that's how fast Petrov plays here.
I find these (these 3, not all 6) etudes way more musical than their counterparts in 1851 Whoever doesn't find these etudes musical needs a visit to the mental hospital
”技術に走ると音楽性が失われがち”という言葉は
「技術が足りない演奏者の言い訳」だと言う事を証明する動画
凄く綺麗で良い曲
自分に技術が足りないっていう戒めの言葉とも言えそう(2年前のコメに何言ってんだろう俺)
Это прекрасное исполнение.
First time I see someone playing the Original version (1838), S. 140 of these studies.
Respect to the man, cause it's a crazy bet to do it live considering how crazy hard these pieces are.
Way harder than their counterpart done 13 years later.
How much harder is the 1838 version of no 3 compared to the later version?
@@lunar.6091 Not a massive amount, but still definitely noticably more difficult. The other etudes all have much larger difficulty gaps.
@@lunar.6091 when you say no. 3, I'm assuming you mean the first thing played in the video. The 1838 version is probably 2x harder, could easily be more than that. If you look at sheet music of it you'd understand. The jumps and just the intervals between the incredibly quick notes combined with the right hand playing seemingly three parts at once. The right hand in the friska of hungarian rhapsody no. 2 is comparable to the right one in this, although this one seems more difficult based on the fact it as to make bigger jumps/play more notes
@@CJ-xw4tl @@CJ-xw4tl yes of course more than 2x harder than later one.
@@lunar.6091 simply think that a good piano student after some years of hard work or a good prodigy after a few years of work could play the later one, and that less than 20 people played the first version in history
ppl talking about the etude 4, but nobody is talking about 3:29 of la Campanella
the right hand jumps at that tempo is inhuman and the fact that he makes it sound so easy makes it even more astonishing on his level of technicality.
that's the best part but camera guy didn't show his hands.
4:29 really impressed me because I usually hear it one octave lower. It was unexpected perfection.
Absolutely stunned. Shocked. Broke the meaning of impossible. What a role model.
リスト
｢思ってたんと違う、、、
誰も弾けない曲を作ろうとしたのに、
表現までできてやがる...！｣
リスト「まだだ、、、俺にはまだ大幻想曲がある、、、」
リスト「ハワード氏には知らない、未発表の練習曲集成がある。」
リスト「しかしテンポが遅い...やはり俺の演奏にはついてこれないか」
「こんな風に弾けるようになりたい」とか、言えないくらい…別格に、大袈裟じゃなく神だとしか思えない
たぶんこの人リストより数段上手いと思う
@@user-nb4vy2xt5r
リスト聞いたことある人間いるのか
@@user-nb4vy2xt5r
憶測で物事を語る癖直した方がいいと思います
@@user-nb4vy2xt5r リストはこの曲を息をするように弾いてこれより難しいラ・カンパネラの主題による大幻想曲も弾いてたと思われるからな
will always be amazed by his dynamics control and clearness even in densest passages
He is very patient and thus has full control even in the hardest parts.true.
He plays the broken tenths at 7:46, unbroken. What a beast.
Yes thats true man
he had big hands
7:46
本当凄い何度も繰り返し見てしまった！！
この曲を弾ける人がこの世に存在したとは 凄すぎる。
I have thought that there is no human who can play this piece till I watched this video. Incredible.
亡くなりましたね、惜しい人が・・・
私は誰だ ビゼー編曲のサン=サーンスのピアノコンチェルト2番もすごかったですね。夢に出てきそうなレベル。
@bill Bloggs Well, Petrov is Russian. Russia is near Asia. I guess the meme isn't as blown away as you might think it is.
@@jurassicplop5180 true lol
@@jurassicplop5180 wait what russia is asia wtf
素晴らしいピアニストが弾くラ・カンパネラを探して聴いて感動していますが、超絶技法のラ・カンパネラを初めて聴きました。聴くことができて幸せです。
I have gained quite a recent obsession with the former s.140 No 4 and have noticed how many intriguing different manners of play it has and every one introduces a great alternative take as most who attempt this are already of a mouth watering proficiency in piano.
これぞ初版のお手本演奏。世界で初めてこの版に挑み、完全な演奏を披露した男。
この曲第2版なんですか？
ひろ三代目 初版です
ですよね、
ひろ三代目 ひろ三代目 第二版ですよ
上の方も言っているようにla clochetteっていう曲名のが初版です
恐らくカンパネラ以外はパガ超が初版です
確か華麗なる大幻想曲ってのが初版だったような
Сколько исполнителей ,столько вариантов исполнения, но есть единицы ,которые нравятся всем. Петров наиталантливейший пианист.
I wouldn't say that so easily... This question would be incredibly hard to answer.
Absolutely great performance!
Truly a talented piano player.
Incredible that besides the theme of the Campanella (Rondò from Paganini's Concerto no. 2), Liszt uses in the same etude the theme of the rondò of the 1st. Concerto (all the central part)
余裕で引いてるペトロフすごすぎます！
Petrov- a true heavyweight- both in the literal and pianistic sense! ;-)
Lol but true
An insult and a compliment in one. Uniquely structured sentence there.
@@therealransu It wasn't meant to be an insult at all, just rather a eulogy with a twist of my unique brand of humour..... ::))
連打、トリルが綺麗すぎる
WOW, that's great!!! Until the moment I watched these 3 videos I thought it's impossible a human to play these etudes (without taking drugs :)). But this really surprised me amazingly. I don't know how much time he has prepared for these pieces, but the demonstates unhuman perfection.I wonder what was the purpose of Liszt to writing these etudes. It's good that he has revised them later.
He also loved paganini so probably would have made the virtuostic like paganini was on the violin
Liszt probably wrote these for himself as showpieces. Realising that other people wanted to play them too, he made them easier as they weren't as good as him (or had smaller hands). Lol.
Liszt could play these
@@alicgluch5553 Liszt could play these like
twice as fast
@@derekliu793 no, liszt can def play this faster than petrov, but he cant play 2 times faster than petrov. Liszt was a virtuoso bit he still was.. human. No human can play it that speed.
this guy is an amazing pianist hands down
You know he is good when he is so relaxed he has the time and cool to adjust his glasses amidst all this chaos.. while i cant keep my shit together through Bach's BWV 911 fugue to save my life!! :) Flawless technique!! Outsanding playing!!
(proceeds to throw the piano from the balcony of third floor...)
Ur a strong man
@@Historia_ yeah also in between the most hardest passages of etude 6 he did adjust his glasses
Maestro Petrov is lucky to have big hands, which you can hear in passages like 7:45-7:48. Tenths. Absolute mad lad.
Hahaha im 13 and i can reach to 13th
Vortex below_is who cares. You are not a Maestro
Neither are you
@@cilox3894 cuz he just randomly told us his reach when nobody asked.
Vortex below_is im 15 and i can barely reach tenths. I really hope my hands will grow bigger so that i can play some pieces easier
これぞ超絶技巧…
ペトロフが生きてる間に生の演奏聴きたかった…。
Музыка для гармонии людей! Николай Арнольдович Петров спасибо вам, вас помнят 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🙏💐💐💐💐👏👏👏👏
人間が弾いているの見いて聞けると思わなかった。いつか、生で聴ける日が来たらいいのになあ
僕が聞かせます
@@pappi0202ワイも
@@touhoukami- 2ヶ月で弾けるようになったんでコンクールでやっちゃいます
@@pappi0202マジか…ワイはあと少し
@@touhoukami- えぐい
I really can't believe nobody is talking about no.3 ! Not only is it better than the revised version, but this interpretation here is the BEST one I've heard ever, not even Filipec's recording is as good as Petrov's here !
弾くだけ なら弾ける人はいるけど、3:30からをこのペースで弾ける人はマジでいないからこの人はほんとに凄い！
2:20からの連打もやばくないですか？w
まじでどうなってるのって感じですw
the virtuosity is over the top ,,, i loved his interpretation of la campenalle
本当に弾いているのか疑うくらいすごい...
Legendary pianist!!
6:50 What a god.
@Roman Bastoni do you know how impossible it is to play at tempo? This is the fastest interpretation I’ve seen
@Roman Bastoni this is the tempo liszt played it at just so you know
@@AsrielKujo no
@@Mereaux oh ok liszt expert, show me a recording of him playing faster
@@AsrielKujo oh ok liszt expert, show me a recording of him playing
Is so satisfying to hear that big chords like Cb Ab Eb or Eb Bb G in left hand without rolling…
Great pianist in all senses, I adore his interpretations! That is perfection! Just listen to your piano and your sound will always live in that heart…maestro.
Rest in peace, Nikolai..........................
yes he saw my playing it better and killed himself lol
@@MegaPianogenius ok
@@MegaPianogenius STFU
greatest camera man ever
I hope that's sarcasm you're expressing.
It had better be
*SARCASM 100*
Such a rare event to see someone play these pieces and the camera man really recorded away from the keys? Shame
That was the only chance to record this *legend* playing this piece (near the keys) for the cameraman.
I heard that he wanted to keep his technique secret.
@@monition5655 it's most probably bullshit,
@@franzliszt8576 lmao
@@franzliszt8576
0:46 lmao
Cuánta precisión!!,
young and so talented... rest in peace
valentin malakhov young??? he was 68 for heavens sake hardly a spring chicken lol
sam333 ok
valentin malakhov young??? he was 9750^69 for heaves sake hardly a spring chicken lol
Valentin Malakhov young??? He was 100^googol for heavens sake hardly a spring chicken lol
Young? He was 11![11![11!!!]] for heavens sake, hardly a spring chicken lol
Great great pianist Petrov!!!!!!!!,
Bravo!
Brilliant ✨
このパガ超って人間でも弾けるんですね！
最近になってパガ超知って、色々チャレンジ動画見たけどやっぱり人間には無理なんじゃと思ってました。コンピュータ演奏並みのテンポと人間らしい感情的な部分がとても素敵です。すぐにお気に入りにさせて頂きました！
Now I guess I know why I never heard this version before at piano competitions!
Or in ANY venue?
楽譜通りすら弾けないのに、表現のレベルまでいってるのは流石にプロというか、神というか、きもいわ_(:3」z)_
10:37 flawless glasses adjustment
6:48 very epok
выдающийся виртуоз и музыкант нашего времени,светлая память добрейшей души человеку,обожаю!!
About 180 years too late maam!!!
incrivel execução, saudações do Brasil
FANTASTIC...
Superb fantastic
Que diifferrente la canpanela. ,me gusta ,le hizo un arreglo. muy bello
彼はとても良いです。
生で聞いてみたかった😭
다시봐도 경이롭다....
感動
amazing
Wow. I've only heard LaCampanella, so hearing all of this is really cool.
Браво! 🙏💐💐💐🧡👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏💎🎶👏👏👏👏👏
This is a much better version of La Campanella. How the other one got so well known over this one I have no idea. Both are good but this version is superior I think.
I agree completely, but I'd conjecture that this is less known because many fewer people can play it. Not because of a lack of technical ability in pianists (which can be developed), but in this, there are parts where your hands need to reach an octave and a half (which cannot be developed easily).
Alex Cameron *most people's hand physically will never reach 1 and half octaves
i believe that the other version is better. Especially the modern one is the one that i heard first. So this sounded weird to me. Anyway, i think this is not superior to the modern one.
no, not really actually... the version that Valentina Lisitsa plays is really good. Everybody seems to like it in the video :P But I'm not saying this is BAD or anything, I'm just saying that I don't really enjoy this version, apparently, the original one. Most pianist play the modern version, so I got influenced by it, and now I listen to it more.
***** I agree with you that D sharp give headaches. This version is much better
Годы уходят, а кумиры остаются недосягаемыми!!!
Omg it's the first time i hear someone playing arppegios (caprice 1) etude !
First and only time. No one really plays that piece hahaha.
Goran Filipec and Elisa Tomellini also played this.
@@jonathanferiza8966 true but petrov and leslie howard were probably first to record them
生で聞いてみたいな
파가니니 4번 진짜 미쳤네
this guy is a god.
True
He played the fourth etude in chordal arpeggios. It is the most difficult etude of Franz Liszt and one of the most difficult etudes ever written in the 19th century. Only Mereaux's "Bravura" can compare.
Yep. I wonder if liszt him self could play it at full tempo.
@@392023001 full tempo: th-cam.com/video/G5T7alRsW7E/w-d-xo.html (i think liszt himself could not play like that, he actually struggled with his own tannhauser overture)
@@Santosificationable tbh wasn't that from when he was a bit older and retired from the scene?
@@AEPMUSlC yes
You can't forget Scherzo Alla Napolitana. Bravura is just jumps, Scherzo has it all
模範解答だなこれ
RIP Nikolai.
人間が弾いているの初めて見た、、、感動して吐きそう、。
wow!
@newFransFerencLiszt totally agree
i wanna see how he played that stuff at 4:40
greatest
WTF THIS IS SO AWESOME
nice
凄すぎる...!
どういうことですか ?
Erevender 収穫 演奏が凄すぎるという事です
特に深い意味はありません
♥ ♪ はい。
Erevender 知ってたら悪いんだがこの曲は「パガニーニによる超絶技巧練習曲」と言って、レコーディングに成功したのがこの動画で弾いているペトロフ氏を含めて世界で4人だけと言われている超難曲なんだ。
草
Bravo Nikolai “Kalashnikov” Petrov
なんでこんな余裕そうに弾いてるんだ･･･？(º ﾛ º*)
神が宿る指
If anyone is interested, Horowitz also did a recording of No. 5 (1838 version) and highly recommend it
I will sure check it out
6:49
DAMN IS HE GONNA PLAY TRANSCENDENTE ETUDE 6?!!! im listening to etude 4 right now omg
@Dv 7654 yeah we are lucky to hear maestro petrov's recording but i am sorry to say but lang lang cant play it.
For 4:40, Put it on 1.25x speed so you'd hear the real tempo
Quater=60
@@vladyatsuk I finally found the smart one who knows correctly
@@melonica90 but first version is impossible to play because of tempo so i dont know
There is no "real tempo". The original caprice is something like twice the speed, which would be absurd. 50-60 bpm is reasonable and that's how fast Petrov plays here.
@@jurassicplop5180 this tempo is in 2nd version
４番もひけるのか・・・・
저 두꺼운 손가락으로 저렇게 가볍고 경쾌한 음을 칠 수 있다니....
Weightless playing.
the real ling ling.
これも一回目の改編という地獄
The 2nd one reminds me couperin le tic-tac chok
これはヤバイ動画を見つけた。
I find these (these 3, not all 6) etudes way more musical than their counterparts in 1851
Whoever doesn't find these etudes musical needs a visit to the mental hospital
True, it felt pain in the ass whenever someone said popular la campanella is better than this la campanella
2:04 Rofl, this just isn't human (the piece and his playing^^)
2:04
@@minmick6713 thanks
i was inspired, and sat down before the piano, try to immitate petrov's performance, AND FAILED CATHASTROPHICALLY!!
Hey that guy was my teacher's teacher!
弾いてみようとした大体の人が最初に思うこと
まず指が開かない…………
Petrov compuso está versión ? Quien ?
Sounds so smooth and nice but anyone except serious musicians can appreciate how hard these are
リストが実際に弾いてる音源とかないんですかね？
Just look at his eyebrows when he plays this xD. Every musician has his own thing xD
Hmm ok
l
@newFranzFerencLiszt ?