This is my favorite version. Costumes, scenery, and acting is superb. Elizabeth, Mr. collins, Mrs. Bennet, Lydia, and Lady Catherine are excellently presented.
This is my favourite version. She's not rude but expressive. He actually uses his voice to express himself. And his disappointment in her rejection was the only emotion he showed until she agrees at the end. He is holding it all in.
It was written in such a classy way. The ego expressed, the insult he gives and her refusal...they show restraint, integrity, self-control and intelligence. Qualities we rarely see displayed today...in these...modern and enlightened times....
This is and forever will be my favorite adaptation of Pride and Prejudice. Garvie and Rintoul, along with the rest of the cast, are perfect and capture every aspect of the characters and story perfectly! More people need to watch and appreciate this miniseries ^.^
Rintoul's Mr. Darcy is, in this scene, what I have always pictured he was in the novel. The man is all pride, he is conceited, he s scolding her. She is wonderful, too. Well done, both of them! The best first proposal, when it comes to being faithful to the novel! (although I do not considerer faithfulness to Austen's novel a very strong reason for enjoing the movies based upon it...)
I do consider fidelity to the author essential in a film which launches itself under the title of a novel. A film 'version' is an 'adaptation' of another's work and it matters not whether the author died yesterday or 206 years ago, It is tantamount to theft. Some limitations are necessary of course, but they they have to be licensed by the text, and all except ne instance in this version are so. which is why this version is so very good and Elizabeth Garvie is the best Lizzie I have struck. She performs, and is directed, to make the camera serve the author rather than the director or box office. Her voice, her eyes, her facial expressions render Jane Austen's creation perfectly.
I love this version and agree with your assessment of Elizabeth Garvie. She gives such a nuanced performance here. David Rintoul is exactly as I imagined him. This version does not give us much insight into Darcy unfortunately. His smile at the end of the series when they are walking is transformative. Love being reminded of this version. This was the first one I saw. I watched it with my mother when I was in junior high school. Then I ran out and got the book and have been collecting versions ever since!
This version is really believable. The actress is excellent and Darcy also .All the others are much too glamourous for reality.I like both of these very much.
Agree, Elizabeth Garvie the best ever Eliz. Rintoul's stodgy 2 dimensional characterization warms and develops towards the end of the series. i like his portrayal and vote him as the best Darcy. Whole series was the best P & P for me. Thanks for posting
Why are some people critizing this 1980 version? I own both the 1980 and 1995 ones but the 1980 version has a slight edge over 1995. Just because this way filmed more like a play than a movie,well, this early BBC effort was brilliant. I even liked all the actors especially David Rintoul as Mr. Darcy.He is true to the character of Darcy and captivates all his nuances with subtlety. Modernists should appreciate this piece of art since more modern adaptations get more stupid than delightful.
I don’t like the Kiera knightly P&P with all the stringy, dirty hair! I love, love, love Brenda Blethyn (modern Mrs Bennett) in Saving Grace and Little Voice. Favorites are this P&P and 1995 P&P and 1995 Persuasion. The BBC persuasion is awesome too!
This version of P&P I think is the most realistic. This isn't one of the glamorous Hollywood versions that make it modern. It actually holds true to the customs of the time period.
I PREFER this version to all others, regardless of what others may say. I think it captures the complex social scene of the period and the language style better than other versions. The acting is not at all deficient. The 2005 version is an excellent one also, but this is my favorite of all time. I believe the release year was 1985, according to the notes on my own copy of the video.
I love this version of P&P. Every actor seems perfectly cast for their part. I do have a bit of reservation as far as Rintoul. He's a bit too stone-faced for me. Thank you for posting this clip. I have this version on DVD, but this episode with the proposal is faulty and won't play.
This version is very dear to me, I've rewatched recentely and I could understand Rintoul aproach to the character. Not my favorite, but he delivered a consistent Darcy.
I agree with all the reviewers who have said that this is the best television adaptation of Jane Austen’s greatest novel “Pride & Prejudice”. Elizabeth Garvie plays the novel’s central character Elizabeth Bennett excellently, but for me, David Rintoul’s Fitzwilliam Darcy is even better. The very handsome Rintoul plays Darcy exactly as written by the author. His pride, conceit and aloofness makes it easy to see why Elizabeth Bennett dislikes him so much at first. Of course she has also been misled in her opinion of him by George Wickham’s account of him. Another standout acting performance is given by Judy Parfitt as Darcy’s aunt Lady Catherine De Bourgh. All of the novel’s characters are well played and this 1980 televised version is definitely my favourite adaptation of the book.
This is such an unfair comment to make since Mr. Darcy, in "Pride & Prejudice", is portrayed correctly in this version. Perhaps people like you and others need a more romantic, puppy dog looking Mr. Darcy. Okay, fine with that BUT don't go critizing David Rintoul's portrayal since his is perhaps a more difficult performance. To show the subtle changes in body language, voice, and looks is not so easy as it seems. Read the actual book and see how the book character compares to this version.
When I first saw this (which was only recently) I must admit that I felt David Rintoul was rather too stuffy - but having re-watched it, I must say the interpretation grows. The Lizzy of Elizabeth Garvie, though, I think is wonderful..
You are so right. This is my favourite version. Both actors did a phenomenal job. Didn't like the 2005 version coz of Keira. But this version was true to the characters and the acting was out of this world. Subtle but amazing.
Oh yes, I still blame myself how I didn't like this version at first but it grows on me as I watch it more, then I can gradually see how excellent the characters portrayals in this are
No offense but the tension between them in this version almost makes me die of boredom. This really doesn't click for me... My favorite is the 1995 version.
Damn. Never occurred to me before. Rintoul is playing Darcy as being somewhere in 'the spectrum'--not simply suppressing his emotions--deeply upset by them. He's incredibly uncomfortable--angry--to have to expose himself to Elizabeth this way. He's angry at her for making him feel so strongly, when any strong emotion makes him uncomfortable. Elizabeth has no such problem, but she has developed a restraint in response to her family's marginal stature within the upper class. They are both proud, both prejudiced. But she doesn't understand who he is, because his very nature makes it impossible to share his true feelings. HIs proposal therefore comes across as an insult. And she still believes in Wickham's good nature--Wickham being a classic narcissist, skilled at putting up a false front to get what he wants from others. Therefore, she judges Darcy harshly for his correct assessment of Wickham's true self. When Austen wrote, little was known about what we now call autism, and when mild, as it is here, it was probably mainly treated as mere haughtiness. Darcy is a good person, under his hauteur--you can see Rintoul's Darcy struggling, knowing her words are true, that he's behaved horribly. But it's like asking Sheldon Cooper not to be rude. Difference is, this isn't a sitcom, and it's not being played for laughs. Fascinating.
Yes. Elizabeth Garvie does so good as Lizzie, but David Rintoul doesn't do so well. If I could combine the 2005 Mr. Darcy and this Elizabeth Bennet, with the accuracy of the 1995 version, that would be ideal.
The accuracy of the 1995 version! Darcy coming from the lake in a sexed-up wet shirt (and even that not going to the ludicrous extent its adapter, Andrew Davies, wanted)? Where was that in the novel? Ghastly. No, this Fay Weldon adaptation, filmed as a tv series in 1979 and broadcast in 1980 is without question the most accurate version, ie in being close to the book. And to my mind it is by far the best version.
@@villiamo3861 Finally someone said this 🥲 I detest the "wet Darcy" scene in the 1995 adaptation though the series itself is quite good. But this 1980 adaptation is the brilliant one to me
@@villiamo3861 Bravo! This is indeed the most accurate version. This Darcy is exactly whom I picture when I read the book. The 1995 version may be beautiful to look at, but it's far from perfect. I could go on for quite a while about its flaws.
I like the 1995 Pride and Prejudice, but have a hard time with the way J.E. portrayed Elizabeth in all her scenes. As I said this 1980 version will always be my favorite.
I definitely preferred the 2005 scene best for its cinematography, it's intensity and passion. I equally enjoy both the 1980 and 1995 movies if this scene almost as much as the 2005. They make the book come to life.
I like all the versions. What I like about this one is that they are so unlikeable in so many ways, and we don't immediately love Lizzie. We slowly come to like them, as she slowly comes to like Darcy. My favorite is the 2005 version because of the staging... the slowly moving closer, the aaaalmost kiss at the end. But I appreciate them all. Thank you so much for posting these!!
I think we're the only people in the world whose favorite P&P version is 2005 T_T .....I love 1995 too for being very very accurate, but 2005 version for some reason appeals to me more.... especially their take on Mr. Darcy.
Sometimes I find the dialogue a little stilted and unnatural in this adaption, but this is probably the best first proposal that I have seen! Bravo and brava!
Will have to admit that this is one of my least favorites...but then again, I think none of the adaptations have captured what I see going on in my head when I read P & P over and over, again. It is no negative judgement on the actors/scripts, etc., it's just that I think I need to constantly hope that they continue to make adaptations!!!! Hoping they get it right. Who am I kidding - even bad Mr. Darcy's are better than none. And I will watch them all with alacrity! LOL
Olá! Eu vi as três versões (80,95,05) e creio que, no geral, esta (80) é a melhor. Isto pq adoro o livro e acho a mais próxima. Mas, sobretudo, pq E. Garvin é sem dúvida a melhor Lizzy: JE é doce demais, KN é de menos; garvin é a que consegue melhor dosar swetness with archness. Esta cena é ótima para demostrar o quanto ela é perfeita como Lizzy, na medida certa. JE parece-me controlada demais, KN agressiva demais, enquanto Garvin dosa indignação com controle no ponto certo. (cont.)
Still my preferred Elizabeth, even if Darcy sucks. Why can they never get the casting of Elizabeth AND Darcy right within one production? It's always spot-on for one and weak in the other.
I truly don’t understand how anyone can watch this and think it’s superior to the 1995 version. I only just learned of this version today, so I have no nostalgia for it, and I’m currently making my way through the ‘95 version for probably the dozenth time. So maybe I’m just unfairly biased, but this Darcy is so awkward and dispassionate. I’ll stick with Colin Firth, thanks. 😂
It's not just the acting, there are other aspects to take into account when comparing movies like the cinematics for example. Of course, considering there is a 25 yr time gap but then again, it all counts.
i'm curious as to whether you have read the book. This is the best part of the book and they basically cut it out in the 2005 movie. No this is not the best one compared two the 1995 version but please dont even try to compare it to 2005 because it would not be fare to either film or actress.
i ve seen the diffrent darcys proposals and i definitely choose the 2005 versión, is the more intense, sexy, touching ever... anyway, all the versions are so enjoyable, but the aproach of the keyra and mathew , almost kissing in the rain is the most romantic of all times
Well your clips are the only parts I've seen of the 1980 version but I've seen the entire BBC version and the entire Kiera Knightley version, but I must agree that this Darcy is pretty terrible. He seems so indifferent the entire him he's giving the speech to ask Elizabeth to marry him, he seems almost bored. I also agree that this Elizabeth is very good, though I don't think I've seen enough to call her the best, she does an admirable job.
(cont.) D. Rintoul parece-me ter a atuação menos atraente, apesar de que acho que sua atuação é mais sutil do que as demais. Entretanto, creio que o problema maior de Rintoul - e desta versão em si - é que não há química entre ele e E.Garvin. Este creio é o grande problema de um Darcy, qualquer que seja o ator, pois Darcy só "existe" a medida que ele interage com Lizzy; enquanto que Lizzy é um personagem mais independente. A química se encontra de verdade entre CF e JE, e MM e KN.
Very non emotional...too sterile! Even boring! Nope. I will stick with 1995...Colin Firth and 2005 Matthew MacFadyen. Even Lizzie is boing ...yawn! Keira and Jennifer, that’s acting! Nope!
This is my favorite version. Costumes, scenery, and acting is superb.
Elizabeth, Mr. collins, Mrs. Bennet, Lydia, and Lady Catherine are excellently presented.
The only thing I think the 1995 version did better was the dance music, otherwise the 1980 adaptation is superior
This is my favourite version. She's not rude but expressive. He actually uses his voice to express himself. And his disappointment in her rejection was the only emotion he showed until she agrees at the end. He is holding it all in.
1980 best version...the language delivery ..the tone... the costumes... the natural acting all superb
Rarely u see a casting this perfect, this is undoubtedly the best Elizabeth Darcy pair❤
This is the most polite argument I've ever heard.
lol
It was written in such a classy way. The ego expressed, the insult he gives and her refusal...they show restraint, integrity, self-control and intelligence. Qualities we rarely see displayed today...in these...modern and enlightened times....
@@kimquinn7728 Jane Austen is a master 😊
Darcy: How shall I insult you? Let me count the ways!
Lizzie: Rejects him
Darcy: Surprised pikachu face
😂😂😂 Poor, poor Darcy.
Yeah, what a way to propose!
I wasn’t aware until just now that this version of P&P even existed! I have seen 3 others over and over. This is magnificent!
I love this version. I think David Rintoul is perfect as Darcy
This is and forever will be my favorite adaptation of Pride and Prejudice. Garvie and Rintoul, along with the rest of the cast, are perfect and capture every aspect of the characters and story perfectly! More people need to watch and appreciate this miniseries ^.^
When I'm too lazy to read the book I watch this series cause it's accurate compared to the book and the characters portrayals in this are excellent
Rintoul's Mr. Darcy is, in this scene, what I have always pictured he was in the novel. The man is all pride, he is conceited, he s scolding her. She is wonderful, too. Well done, both of them! The best first proposal, when it comes to being faithful to the novel! (although I do not considerer faithfulness to Austen's novel a very strong reason for enjoing the movies based upon it...)
I do consider fidelity to the author essential in a film which launches itself under the title of a novel. A film 'version' is an 'adaptation' of another's work and it matters not whether the author died yesterday or 206 years ago, It is tantamount to theft. Some limitations are necessary of course, but they they have to be licensed by the text, and all except ne instance in this version are so. which is why this version is so very good and Elizabeth Garvie is the best Lizzie I have struck. She performs, and is directed, to make the camera serve the author rather than the director or box office. Her voice, her eyes, her facial expressions render Jane Austen's creation perfectly.
@@benedictcowell6547 Well said 😊
I love this version and agree with your assessment of Elizabeth Garvie. She gives such a nuanced performance here. David Rintoul is exactly as I imagined him. This version does not give us much insight into Darcy unfortunately. His smile at the end of the series when they are walking is transformative. Love being reminded of this version. This was the first one I saw. I watched it with my mother when I was in junior high school. Then I ran out and got the book and have been collecting versions ever since!
This version is really believable. The actress is excellent and Darcy also .All the others are much too glamourous for reality.I like both of these very much.
True 😊
Agree, Elizabeth Garvie the best ever Eliz. Rintoul's stodgy 2 dimensional characterization warms and develops towards the end of the series. i like his portrayal and vote him as the best Darcy. Whole series was the best P & P for me. Thanks for posting
Wow, this is really good.
Why are some people critizing this 1980 version? I own both the 1980 and 1995 ones but the 1980 version has a slight edge over 1995. Just because this way filmed more like a play than a movie,well, this early BBC effort was brilliant. I even liked all the actors especially David Rintoul as Mr. Darcy.He is true to the character of Darcy and captivates all his nuances with subtlety. Modernists should appreciate this piece of art since more modern adaptations get more stupid than delightful.
I agree 😊 The more recent adaptations glamorise everything too much.
I don’t like the Kiera knightly P&P with all the stringy, dirty hair! I love, love, love Brenda Blethyn (modern Mrs Bennett) in Saving Grace and Little Voice.
Favorites are this P&P and 1995 P&P and 1995 Persuasion.
The BBC persuasion is awesome too!
this version and the 1995 version are my favourite!
Me too!!!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
This version of P&P I think is the most realistic. This isn't one of the glamorous Hollywood versions that make it modern. It actually holds true to the customs of the time period.
I really like the lizzie from this version.
I PREFER this version to all others, regardless of what others may say. I think it captures the complex social scene of the period and the language style better than other versions. The acting is not at all deficient. The 2005 version is an excellent one also, but this is my favorite of all time. I believe the release year was 1985, according to the notes on my own copy of the video.
The perfect recipe of how to disguise an insult as proposal😂.
Indeed.
I love this version of P&P. Every actor seems perfectly cast for their part. I do have a bit of reservation as far as Rintoul. He's a bit too stone-faced for me. Thank you for posting this clip.
I have this version on DVD, but this episode with the proposal is faulty and won't play.
This version is very dear to me, I've rewatched recentely and I could understand Rintoul aproach to the character. Not my favorite, but he delivered a consistent Darcy.
Elizabeth Garvey is the best Elizabeth Bennett bar none.
Oh my goodness! I thought I was the only one who liked this version best!!
It's not my favorite, but I this version is really good, and I think Elizabeth Garvie is the best Elizabeth Bennet.
I love this version the best too
I agree with all the reviewers who have said that this is the best television adaptation of Jane Austen’s greatest novel “Pride & Prejudice”. Elizabeth Garvie plays the novel’s central character Elizabeth Bennett excellently, but for me, David Rintoul’s Fitzwilliam Darcy is even better. The very handsome Rintoul plays Darcy exactly as written by the author. His pride, conceit and aloofness makes it easy to see why Elizabeth Bennett dislikes him so much at first. Of course she has also been misled in her opinion of him by George Wickham’s account of him. Another standout acting performance is given by Judy Parfitt as Darcy’s aunt Lady Catherine De Bourgh. All of the novel’s characters are well played and this 1980 televised version is definitely my favourite adaptation of the book.
Elizabeth Garvie plays the best Lizzy ever.
This is such an unfair comment to make since Mr. Darcy, in "Pride & Prejudice", is portrayed correctly in this version. Perhaps people like you and others need a more romantic, puppy dog looking Mr. Darcy. Okay, fine with that BUT don't go critizing David Rintoul's portrayal since his is perhaps a more difficult performance. To show the subtle changes in body language, voice, and looks is not so easy as it seems. Read the actual book and see how the book character compares to this version.
When I first saw this (which was only recently) I must admit that I felt David Rintoul was rather too stuffy - but having re-watched it, I must say the interpretation grows. The Lizzy of Elizabeth Garvie, though, I think is wonderful..
Excellent comment (I realise I'm saying this to you 10 years after you made it - but you were right then, and remain so!)
You are so right. This is my favourite version. Both actors did a phenomenal job. Didn't like the 2005 version coz of Keira. But this version was true to the characters and the acting was out of this world. Subtle but amazing.
Oh yes, I still blame myself how I didn't like this version at first but it grows on me as I watch it more, then I can gradually see how excellent the characters portrayals in this are
I think this is the most intense first proposal in all versions
1:12 I hope I will now be rewarded 😂😂
🤣
No offense but the tension between them in this version almost makes me die of boredom. This really doesn't click for me... My favorite is the 1995 version.
Damn. Never occurred to me before. Rintoul is playing Darcy as being somewhere in 'the spectrum'--not simply suppressing his emotions--deeply upset by them. He's incredibly uncomfortable--angry--to have to expose himself to Elizabeth this way. He's angry at her for making him feel so strongly, when any strong emotion makes him uncomfortable.
Elizabeth has no such problem, but she has developed a restraint in response to her family's marginal stature within the upper class. They are both proud, both prejudiced. But she doesn't understand who he is, because his very nature makes it impossible to share his true feelings. HIs proposal therefore comes across as an insult. And she still believes in Wickham's good nature--Wickham being a classic narcissist, skilled at putting up a false front to get what he wants from others. Therefore, she judges Darcy harshly for his correct assessment of Wickham's true self.
When Austen wrote, little was known about what we now call autism, and when mild, as it is here, it was probably mainly treated as mere haughtiness. Darcy is a good person, under his hauteur--you can see Rintoul's Darcy struggling, knowing her words are true, that he's behaved horribly. But it's like asking Sheldon Cooper not to be rude. Difference is, this isn't a sitcom, and it's not being played for laughs.
Fascinating.
Fantastic analysis! Very eye-opening. Thank you!
Yes. Elizabeth Garvie does so good as Lizzie, but David Rintoul doesn't do so well. If I could combine the 2005 Mr. Darcy and this Elizabeth Bennet, with the accuracy of the 1995 version, that would be ideal.
The accuracy of the 1995 version! Darcy coming from the lake in a sexed-up wet shirt (and even that not going to the ludicrous extent its adapter, Andrew Davies, wanted)? Where was that in the novel? Ghastly. No, this Fay Weldon adaptation, filmed as a tv series in 1979 and broadcast in 1980 is without question the most accurate version, ie in being close to the book. And to my mind it is by far the best version.
@@villiamo3861 Finally someone said this 🥲 I detest the "wet Darcy" scene in the 1995 adaptation though the series itself is quite good. But this 1980 adaptation is the brilliant one to me
@@villiamo3861 Bravo! This is indeed the most accurate version. This Darcy is exactly whom I picture when I read the book. The 1995 version may be beautiful to look at, but it's far from perfect. I could go on for quite a while about its flaws.
I definitely prefer this version and this Darcy.Thanks for posting :)
I like the 1995 Pride and Prejudice, but have a hard time with the way J.E. portrayed Elizabeth in all her scenes.
As I said this 1980 version will always be my favorite.
I believe this was initially broadcast in January 1980 and so was produced in 1979
I definitely preferred the 2005 scene best for its cinematography, it's intensity and passion. I equally enjoy both the 1980 and 1995 movies if this scene almost as much as the 2005. They make the book come to life.
This is the only scene I have viewed, but I can definitely see why she would turn him down. :)
Awesome
oh! just watching this scene i don't mind it too much. now i have to watch the whole thing before i can properly decide!
I like all the versions. What I like about this one is that they are so unlikeable in so many ways, and we don't immediately love Lizzie. We slowly come to like them, as she slowly comes to like Darcy. My favorite is the 2005 version because of the staging... the slowly moving closer, the aaaalmost kiss at the end. But I appreciate them all. Thank you so much for posting these!!
I think we're the only people in the world whose favorite P&P version is 2005 T_T .....I love 1995 too for being very very accurate, but 2005 version for some reason appeals to me more.... especially their take on Mr. Darcy.
The 2005 dreadfully disrespects the book
He proposed in the most insulting way possible and he talks about civility.
Sometimes I find the dialogue a little stilted and unnatural in this adaption, but this is probably the best first proposal that I have seen! Bravo and brava!
Too stilt , there isn't enough passion; had I watched this.1st, I wouldn't have bothered to watch the following ones.
Тогдашние англичане и страсть несовместимы@@antonellakennedy9564
Will have to admit that this is one of my least favorites...but then again, I think none of the adaptations have captured what I see going on in my head when I read P & P over and over, again. It is no negative judgement on the actors/scripts, etc., it's just that I think I need to constantly hope that they continue to make adaptations!!!! Hoping they get it right. Who am I kidding - even bad Mr. Darcy's are better than none. And I will watch them all with alacrity! LOL
I always get serious second hand embarrassment from this scene.
Olá! Eu vi as três versões (80,95,05) e creio que, no geral, esta (80) é a melhor. Isto pq adoro o livro e acho a mais próxima. Mas, sobretudo, pq E. Garvin é sem dúvida a melhor Lizzy: JE é doce demais, KN é de menos; garvin é a que consegue melhor dosar swetness with archness. Esta cena é ótima para demostrar o quanto ela é perfeita como Lizzy, na medida certa. JE parece-me controlada demais, KN agressiva demais, enquanto Garvin dosa indignação com controle no ponto certo. (cont.)
i completely agree. it looks as though Darcy is in fact scolding her, and she a mere doll of porcelain.
Still my preferred Elizabeth, even if Darcy sucks. Why can they never get the casting of Elizabeth AND Darcy right within one production? It's always spot-on for one and weak in the other.
Maybe because both characters have to be opposites and parallels at the same time. Sounds like a caster’s nightmare!
Darcy is spot on with the book. Book darcy is an incorrigible and unbending man. An unchangingly reserved man.
I truly don’t understand how anyone can watch this and think it’s superior to the 1995 version. I only just learned of this version today, so I have no nostalgia for it, and I’m currently making my way through the ‘95 version for probably the dozenth time. So maybe I’m just unfairly biased, but this Darcy is so awkward and dispassionate. I’ll stick with Colin Firth, thanks. 😂
Awkward is okay for Mr Darcy, but you are right about Dispassionate. He has a totally blank face and flat delivery.
there's like no chemistry at all :|
If you expect this to be a romance then you're quite wrong, please read the book
For you. You put it very properly. :)
It's not just the acting, there are other aspects to take into account when comparing movies like the cinematics for example. Of course, considering there is a 25 yr time gap but then again, it all counts.
i'm curious as to whether you have read the book. This is the best part of the book and they basically cut it out in the 2005 movie. No this is not the best one compared two the 1995 version but please dont even try to compare it to 2005 because it would not be fare to either film or actress.
Seria maravilloso verla en Español
está subtitulada en español
th-cam.com/play/PLbvN6FmFXBrPKiPVbHeJ8GjIroNsSTvaW.html en caso de que no lo hayas encontrado, esta playlist tiene todos los capítulos en orden
Valeria, poderia postar o filme completo? Nunca vir essa versão. É interessante. Fico grata. OBRIGADA!
Me too. :)
❤
i ve seen the diffrent darcys proposals and i definitely choose the 2005 versión, is the more intense, sexy, touching ever...
anyway, all the versions are so enjoyable, but the aproach of the keyra and mathew , almost kissing in the rain is the most romantic of all times
not the way to ask a woman to marry you mate
Well your clips are the only parts I've seen of the 1980 version but I've seen the entire BBC version and the entire Kiera Knightley version, but I must agree that this Darcy is pretty terrible. He seems so indifferent the entire him he's giving the speech to ask Elizabeth to marry him, he seems almost bored. I also agree that this Elizabeth is very good, though I don't think I've seen enough to call her the best, she does an admirable job.
This is also a BBC version.
(cont.) D. Rintoul parece-me ter a atuação menos atraente, apesar de que acho que sua atuação é mais sutil do que as demais. Entretanto, creio que o problema maior de Rintoul - e desta versão em si - é que não há química entre ele e E.Garvin. Este creio é o grande problema de um Darcy, qualquer que seja o ator, pois Darcy só "existe" a medida que ele interage com Lizzy; enquanto que Lizzy é um personagem mais independente. A química se encontra de verdade entre CF e JE, e MM e KN.
Sono d, accordo il guaio che Mr Darcy sia un po' "ingessato"
W cale nie bo takiego napisala Jane Austen.
David Rintoul's performance is akin to watching wood perform. Problem is, wood acts better than he does, or did. Horrible.
Very non emotional...too sterile! Even boring! Nope. I will stick with 1995...Colin Firth and 2005 Matthew MacFadyen. Even Lizzie is boing ...yawn! Keira and Jennifer, that’s acting! Nope!
Shame about the casting, the director and the lighting.
worst darcy ever!
No chemistry between them.... They r so stiff and emotionless.
If you expect this to be a romance then you're quite wrong, please read the book
Sorry, no contest. 2005 wins for me. In this version, Lizzie looks like she is reading from a teleprompter.
She does.
I don't think this lizzy is ideal. But kiera knightly was horrible as lizzy. Sometimes she smiled and acted as she was mad.