They've lived in Myanmar since before 1799. "the Mohammedans, who have long settled in Arakan", "call themselves Rooinga, or natives of Arakan." - Francis Buchanan-Hamilton, 1799, "Burma Empire".
Dera kaal Bhairav, I am from Bangladesh. Let me allow to ask you some question, 1. If rohinga belong to Bangladesh then why they are in your country? 2. In what basis you are claiming Rohinga belong to Bangladesh, they are still living in you country? 3. You are killing Rohinga's brutally why?
Bangladesh created in 1971. So historically all Rohingya went to Myanmar from India (before 1971) and Rohingya lived in Myanmar even in British period. Shouldn't all Rohingya now need to back to India as they migrated from India? Nobody is thinking about humanity here. What Myanmar is doing now, can we call it good practice of humanity?
"The Mohammedans, who have long settled in Arakan", "call themselves Rooinga, or natives of Arakan." - Francis Buchanan-Hamilton, 1799, "Burma Empire".
Reconciliation should include to go to Bangladesh. Only to consider how best to resettle them back to Bangladesh, not in Myanmar. They don't even speak Myanmar or Rakhine languages but Bangladeshi. Let them resettle in their country. You can't call it ethnic cleansing because they are not one. Nobody is killing entire Bangladesh. The root cause of this problem is unchecked influx of migration - not just before Myanmar's independence but also after.
![fellow fellow - พรุ่งนี้ไม่มีใครรู้ feat. INK WARUNTORN [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QP6JyjYx_W0/mqdefault.jpg)
immediate action should be taken by ilhr on monks of budhist
I am a Rohingya refugee I stay in Bangladesh I am belong to Myanmar
Hayimbee hay u English creature, I'm Rohingya than I can speak more than 6 languages , so if u wanna learn I can teach u OK
They've lived in Myanmar since before 1799.
"the Mohammedans, who have long settled in Arakan", "call themselves Rooinga, or natives of Arakan." - Francis Buchanan-Hamilton, 1799, "Burma Empire".
Dera kaal Bhairav,
I am from Bangladesh. Let me allow to ask you some question,
1. If rohinga belong to Bangladesh then why they are in your country?
2. In what basis you are claiming Rohinga belong to Bangladesh, they are still living in you country?
3. You are killing Rohinga's brutally
why?
Bangladesh created in 1971. So historically all Rohingya went to Myanmar from India (before 1971) and Rohingya lived in Myanmar even in British period. Shouldn't all Rohingya now need to back to India as they migrated from India? Nobody is thinking about humanity here. What Myanmar is doing now, can we call it good practice of humanity?
"The Mohammedans, who have long settled in Arakan", "call themselves Rooinga, or natives of Arakan." - Francis Buchanan-Hamilton, 1799, "Burma Empire".
free rohinga
They are all Bangladeshi it's written on their face
Shubh Garg they are not bangdeshi..they live near bangladesh.there language nd culture are not same.i m bangladeshi.
Very soon European countries will be forced to go to the same path as of Mayanmar. As of now it seems to be inavetable .
Reconciliation should include to go to Bangladesh.
Only to consider how best to resettle them back to Bangladesh, not in Myanmar.
They don't even speak Myanmar or Rakhine languages but Bangladeshi. Let them resettle in their country.
You can't call it ethnic cleansing because they are not one. Nobody is killing entire Bangladesh.
The root cause of this problem is unchecked influx of migration - not just before Myanmar's independence but also after.