If they had shown a record of the last 20k years of sea level rises due to climate change it would show that the Great barrier reef was 130 m above sea level until relatively recently.
Yeah, so sad. It’s almost like this planet we live on has evolved millions of times over billions of years. Imagine how utterly insane we are believing we can stop it from evil wing or that we are the reason why it’s still evolving?
It always happens and is natural. Corals release bacteria and other growth every few years, to make room for new growth. That is what give coral its amazing colours. Take a look at the site "Reef Rebels" if you want facts from a scientist who has lived all his life on the GBR and studies it for decades.
its a natural process it goes through every few decades. Come back in 6-12 months and the coral is back again, but now with different microbial bacteria living on it and hence, probably a different colour. Take a look at "Reef Rebels" Channel here on YT, if you want FACTUAL info.
Yeah my uncle was told smoking was bad for 20 years as well. Then when his lungs failed he finally believed them and try to fix it. Want to guess how that turned out?
I’ll believe climate change is a threat when the government starts denying it. Until then, I put it in the category of things they use to take power and wealth.
You always notice the climate change skeptics are always absent from these videos were the evidence is right in front of our eyes and it is so devastating for our natural world and the wonders in it.
Seeinf so many ignorant comments here just proves that we are doomed. It's not even enraging at this point, just really really sad 😢 People really think their food is produced in the supermarket.
@@Aloh-od3ef It's not that simple. Some places were warmer, while others were cooler than present day temperatures. The circumstances were different, as there weren't 8+ billion people on the planet who relied on a steady supply of food. Quality of life was not great for the population of the time.
@@shwnshts9469 to boil the issue down to "The earth was warmer in the medieval period and Roman period" is a massive oversimplification of a very complex problem.
*third world countries, China/many other Asian countries/ Africa countries, and corporations and politicians who send jobs over there because there’s less climate regulations and they don’t have to pay workers as much and then act like the good guys trying to fight climate change; should be more concerned.* There fixed your comment.
For me, this is the number one reason not to have children. Anyone born in the last 10/15 years are going to end up going to war for liveable farm land and drinkable water. They’ll despise us for our inaction and complicity, rightly so.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see. Have children.
This summer, I have planted 23 mango trees. Each of us should plant and nurture a tree to good health. It would do wonders for our planet. What do you think ?
Yes we saw your other comment. While it's great you did, if everyone planted mango trees, there wouldn't be biodiversity. Something we can all do that will actually help the planet is to stop buying fast fashion, for example and stop using plastic like we do. If those things changed world wide, then our planet would be radically changed.
That's simply a lie. The repeated bleaching events are damaging the biodiversity of the Great Barrier Reef. As the planet continues to warm rapidly the bleaching events will continue. Dietzel - Long-term Shifts - Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Richards - Lizard Island - Coral Reefs.
@@ceeemm1901 where are YOUR sources? Where is YOUR data? You don't have any data aside from TH-cam videos that what they are saying in this video is even true
The recovery is turning the reef into a monoculture since those are the few species that can better tolerate the warmer temps. But they’re more vulnerable to crown of thorns predation and disease.
So here is my glimmer of hope. I read that in the short time during covid that people were mostly off the roads and inside, there was a measurable improvement in air quality. So maybe if the world leaders can pull their heads out if their asses, doing something may not take as long as youd think.
Where were these people 10,000 years ago when the world was also changing, and 10,000 years before that and so on all the way back to when the earth was formed? Climate change is natural and always gonna happen. Even without us.
@DarylSolis They rely on the human narcissist complex to sell this. If people stop believing it's all about their actions they whole narrative comes crumbling down.
Human civilization - crucially, our food systems - have developed during a period of climate stability. It is not going to handle this rate of change well. Neither will most ecosystems. "Life on Earth" in a broad sense will eventually adjust and recover, of course. The next intelligent species might have a harder timer of it, given that we've extracted and dispersed so many of the mineral resources that we used to climb the tech ladder (copper, tin, iron, coal).
So are you volunteering to go back to living like a caveman? Because that would solve both our problems. it took 10.000 years for the average temp to go up 2 degrees and end the last proper iceage. We are now adding another 2 over the course of a century . The idea that we have no impact on this is short bus thinking
@@trickslies844 Funny how these people think climate scientists are all liars, but when these same scientists say the climate changed 10,000 years ago, they're suddenly NOT liars.
Everyones crying about burning coal, but nobodys crying for the poor souls whos digging the coal. This world is going straight to hell with a change upon us so terrifying, so profound, so scary that not many can actually see whats REALLY going on in our world and whats REALLY coming upon our existence.
CO2 have both a corrosive/abrasive and a warm dividing effect. The empirical experiment by placing an ice cube in fresh water of room temperature and an ice cube in plain sparkling water (with only extra CO2, no extra sugar, salt...) with same room temperature show that the ice cube in the latter melts first - or rather the "melting" starts with a lot of energetic CO2 bubbles hitting the ice cube causing eddies breaking and mixing currents near the ice cube, tearing it faster down. Opposite what we get with the fluids of low (fridge) temperature - then the ice cube in fresh water melts first. CO2-molecules transfer heat among the molecules through water layers of a bit higher temperature - these layers are less dense than the melting cool water, meaning the heat transfer is easier to happen in warm layers. The nature rule of least resistance. After some time there is so much cool water that it suddenly collides with the warm layers, so we get more rapid melting. But that's too late. But if we introduce a little stirring and do the experiments again, we get same melting time! So we should avoid having flat sea beds (by trawling) surrounding coral reefs, but have a lot of different high stones (or rough terrain) nearby to get enough eddies there (levelling by better mixing of cool and hot currents) - then less stratified water that cause more damage by sudden warm currents hitting the coral reefs.
Thank you for showing that Coral Reefs go through a succession 1º 2º... etc... phases as well? much like forest succession after a burn? Is that what is being implied? Thank you..
It's a good thing that Australia's aborigines left such accurate thermometers and perfect records on the cave walls. The English came in 1788 and continued the daily temperature measurements. We can hardly predict the weather for the next 8 weeks - but we know exactly how warm the sea was there 400 years ago.🤣
Where are they getting this 400 years idea? If your records really go back to 1788, that's only 236 years. And worldwide, records started in 1880. Where are they getting this 400 years number?
@@makt122 did you even watch the video? At 1:11 it showed them drilling into coral reefs to analyse the chemical makeup of the coral in the past. It's like studying tree rings to tell what sort of conditions happened in previous years. Surely that's not too hard to understand?
@@makt122 No it's not. They analyse the recent layers and compare it to the temperatures that were recorded in those years. Then they use that to work out what conditions were like before temperature recordings were possible. Sounds pretty straightforward to me.
Man, the right-wing is just amazing aren’t they. The property isn’t a sea level. It’s significantly above sea level for Martha’s Vineyard. So there are a lot of right-wing media who are lying. Or they’re declaring things true when they don’t know what they’re talking about. I wonder which it is? The logic displayed in some of the articles about this is just astounding. For instance, anyone who enjoys or goes to the beach must not believe in climate change. Wow. That’s kind of like saying that if you own a gun but don’t carry it around then you’re a hypocrite because you don’t think the gun is valuable for personal safety. Or like a weatherman telling everyone it’s going to be hot that day but then they wear a suit and tie (obviously they must be lying or a hypocrite!). So I guess that means that if I believe in climate change but drive a car that uses gasoline I’m a hypocrite? Or that anyone who believes illegal immigration is a big problem but then doesn’t demand that every contractor they hire (to paint, to cut their lawn, to clean the community pool, to clean their office, to repair their) provide proof of citizenship-they must be a hypocrite, right? The OP is amazing: “the theory of human-caused climate change.” OP, it’s not a theory. We have theories about what elements have the most impact or how quick it will develop or how much extreme weather we’ll see. But there is no “theory of human-caused climate change” OP because we’re already seeing it. Calling that a theory is like saying it’s a theory that your parents conceived you…um, no, you already exist.
Interesting that we are just supposed to take their word for it and they give no data to back it up. Worst in 400 years? Can we see the records? Because records didnt really start until less than 150 years ago. So where is the source? Cite your sources and data.
They explain they combined proxy data within the chemistry of the choral, and historical records. If you want to see the specific data, you can look up the study online. It's not like it's hidden anywhere.
Never going to happen. If the climate gestapo had to admit that things are improving somewhere, the funding vanishes. It’s critical to the second home on the Mediterranean that the heavy pumping of taxpayers money into ‘research’. And critical that it can massage facts into a dystopian outlook. It’s my second time around with these people. We had “the ice age is coming” back in the day. 46 years in the energy industry taught me much.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
That's simply not true. The repeated bleaching events are damaging the biodiversity of the GBR. Dietzel - Long-term Shifts - Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Richards - Lizard Island - Coral Reefs.
@faithingod5533 Anthropogenic CO2 emissions are rapidly warming the planet. The Great Barrier Reef is suffering from bleaching events nearly every year. We have to stop this uncontrolled experiment on the planet's Climate.
Ya we all know. Tell it to the third world countries, China/many other Asian countries/ Africa countries, and corporations/politicians who send jobs over there because there’s less regulations and they don’t have to pay workers as much and then act like the good guys trying to fight climate change. Oh and yourselves (the media) for not calling them out💁♂️.
Reefs can live up to 10,000 years old. Pretty sure there is technology to know through the layers of the sediments the temperature centuries ago. Just like they can unveil the levels of CO2 in snow. No wonder we are where we're at, these people are literal 🐵's
@@cosmo588 The coral reefs have layers of sediments. Each layer contains information of what the water was like at that time. That's how they do it with ice and are able to understand what was happening thousands of years ago. Science is hard, it's simpler and easier to not think at all, we know.
Climate change & extinction of life. ITS TO LATE! Water weight displacement has a tremendous affect on continental positions. As The ice melts the location of the water changes and applies pressure on different regions around the world causing subduction zones to accelerate advancing the movement of geographical regions. As the tundra warms up it is releasing 2X more carbon into our atmosphere than what currently exists. the rate of carbon release increases as the tundra warms up while the increased carbon levels speed up the tundra thaw rate advancing the ice melt progression Speed. Alignment with solar entities also affect the push and pull affect on the planet also contributing to regional movements of land mass. Over this next 10 years you will see mass movement of continents around the world as the ice in the north and south melt while displacing the weight through water distribution. The weight of the ice won’t be there anymore causing the land mass to rise and the water will relocate to the equator adding weight affecting the shape of the earth resulting in extensive land mass movement. Atmospheric pressure will also be a contributing factor as there will be more water evaporation and condensation with precipitation all over the earth. The earth crust is floating and being recycled over time. Spring and autumn are much shorter seasons compared to a decade ago. 2027-2034 are going to be a period of time where mass effect on planetary events/climate change will dramatically disrupt global agriculture. Add into the equation the unpredictable forest fires, the ongoing wars igniting oil fires and the possible use of nuclear weapons while Factoring in the radiation we are currently subjecting our atmosphere to with cell phone towers, wifi routers, and 5-6G satellites. it seems futile combating the inevitable. As the ice melts from the north and south the water displacement around earth will redistribute weight on tectonic plates all over the world. This will accelerate the movement of subduction zones causing massive earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and continental shifts. The extra water will lead to excessive rain/storms causing landslides and flooding everywhere advancing the severity of the temperatures, wind speeds, humidity and electrical activity. The Hudson Bay will eventually rupture the North American continent from the Hudson Bay to the Mississippi all the way to the Gulf of Mexico. The subduction zone’s on the west coast will slide under the continent. Mount Saint Helens and Yellowstone super volcano will erupt. We are already seeing this in process with earthquakes, flooding and volcanoes most recently in Japan, Russia, Italy, Iceland, Hawaii, China, east central North America and India. It’s recommended to be 500km away from oceans, 500ft above sea levels, 500km away from subduction zones and 500 km west of any volcanic zones. These will be the safest places but you will still have to figure out how you are going to sustain yourself in the recommended area’s. Global mass migration is inevitable. Billion’s or people and animals will perish and food shortages will be overwhelming. Diseases will be unprecedented. In addition consider what’s going to happen to all the nuclear power plants, weapons and waste with mass depopulation. Sadly Tibet, New Zealand and Antarctica are probably going to be the best places to be. Earth probably won’t be inhabitable for the next 30k years. Greed, pursuit of power, ego and selfishness is the downfall of humanity as we enter the extinction of life on earth.
Say goodbye to the reef guys, it’s as good as gone. Say goodbye to most of our beloved wildlife, it’ll be gone if you make it to old age. Nothing will change
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
The population is increasing every year. wasting a lot of natural resources and producing a lot of toxic waste. How can we solve climate change from the root cause of population expansion ? Thanks
Wasted effort if the rest of the world is building coal power plants….which they are. And we can’t stop them. We are more screwed than you know if you think stopping oil would make a dent.
Went and had a look for myself - it looked better than it did 50 years ago, so I'm more inclined to believe the report at th-cam.com/video/24kGGAVDslE/w-d-xo.html. The problem is that good news on the reef is not good for funding.
Isnt it interesting that people who are not scientists know more than people who work in the industry. When you get sick - do you go to the mechanic to get treated - or if you go to a doctor - do you tell him the treatment you want?
@@growdaddy4281 I dont care where you live - its what you know. You are speaking about a local area - not the whole reef and the bleaching hasnt started yet. Areas of the reef are affected differently - its not a uniform thing. Tell me about it after it happens
@@TedBear1954 You poor worry old wart! Scientists nowadays believe that a man can become a woman if he mutilates his genitals - Just because a scientist said it, doesn’t make it true. Hundreds of years after we will be dead, my family will still be enjoying the reef. Have a pleasant day champion!
The world still haven't learn anything from back in 2022 because that was the worst heatwaves 🥵as the temperatures went up has cause a lot of fire, drought and deaths. If the people of the world have just take this climate change very seriously and do something about it then maybe the year wouldn't have gotten worst.
Still wasn't record temps in most places. Most high records are from 30, 40, 50 years ago. And that's only using 150 years of data, which isn't a long period. So our recent temps are not concerning since they aren't breaking records.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
@@makt122 Thats false on the record heat bits and also ignores the fact that Individual heat spot records are not the same as average heat temperature records
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
I worked in Marine Park (4 years) Management at Ningaloo MP with AIIMs researches. Honest and truthfull Discussion was alwYs the same. The reefs are fine ...why the scare mongering.? Publicly they push the barrow to get research funding.
as usual most of what you’re saying is wrong. While it’s true parts of the GBR have recently recovered, it’s not the greatest coverage ever recorded reefwide. The part about biodiversity is even more blatantly wrong since the corals that are recovering are nearly a monoculture which are particularly susceptible to crown of thorns predation and disease
For those who find this comment convincing, this is the same person who repeatedly misrepresents and misunderstands the sources he cites. A previous argument of his made clear he doesn’t even know the difference between a linear and an accelerating trend. If you don’t see that as a red flag you’re hopeless
The planet was slightly cooling for six thousand years and heading towards another glaciation until the beginning of the Industrial Era when it began rapidly warming due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. CO2 levels are the highest for at least two million years, probably longer. The next glaciation has been put on indefinite hold because of CO2 levels.
Yeah, and what if leprechauns started breeding like rabbits a began chewing our shins off? And what if the aliens made all our tyres disappear?....and what if...
@@ceeemm1901 you’ve never actually listened to them have you? Just little cuts from people who say their fwits who cut out only a select part to make them seem like fwits. Also you played yourself with your comment, saying how they get millions of views, while bbc and media like it are struggling to get a few thousand even with all their bots. That speaks for itself who the real fwits are (sadly it seems your one of them).
Hold it a second, lads --- not that I dispute your overall assertion, but were instruments even available 4 centuries ago to make such precise measurements?
@@diannehogan7605 Science is not infallible -- global warming wasn't to be a problem til late 21st century. It's already killed thousands of people, burned off millions of acres of forest worldwide; destroyed cities...Whose "evidence of the conditions in the past" is prepared to put a stop to this, Ms Hogan? BTW -- do you still drive your own car?
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Who's gonna stop the rising temperature of the sea if its cause is from the shift of rotation axis rather than fossil fuel combustion? Lives under water is not the only one to be destined to dooms. On the land, in the air, nothing can survive without paying serious price for that. It's been predicted so long that we should pull through the most harrowing moments of survival in this era. If the climate change stems from the rotation of the axis and in which I believe is the true cause of all disasters impending soon.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Like growth rings on trees you can examine what conditions were like years ago. Even layers of rock and dirt show if fires or cold periods impacted ages ago.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Temperature is estimated using proxy data. The biodiversity of the GBR is being severely damaged by the repeated bleaching events. Dietzel - Long-term Shifts - Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Richards - Lizard Island - Coral Reefs. As the planet continues to warm rapidly due anthropogenic CO2 emissions the bleaching events will continue.
@NoWindNoSunNoPower every year cycle a tree gets rings. And the air temperature can indicate water temperature and also thousand year old glaciers temperature layers can indicate cycles. That's partly how we know how crocs lived in an Antarctica at time where it was swamp
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
As of 2022, China 🇨🇳 was by far the world's largest *coal* consumer with 55% of energy use, an increase of 2% of the total energy from the year before. So China is accelerating the use of coal despite it having signed the Paris agreement.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
And what are your qualifications? Why should I trust the hot take of some ignorant, arrogant guy in a youtube comment section rather than an expert who knows infinitely more than you on this subject?
Too many Vehicles on the Roads!. There needs to be a No Drive Month! Only emergency Vehicles permitted on the roads!. You can Walk to work! or use Public Transportation! Bicycles! Electric Scooter!. Too many Trucks! also!. Bring back HORSE AND CARRIAGES!.
It’s ok, it always grows back greater……yr already a part of the problem with all the geoengineering programmes for decades, no wonder yr screwing most things up 🤫
IF you believe in The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection... adaptation (which I do, but with more than a nod to the contribution of mutation) then you have to believe that corals will eventually adapt to warmer water... one less thing to worry about, then!
Yes but evolution takes years, even hundreds of years. They have adapted to changes in the past, but this change is happening so rapidly they cannot keep up. Stop brushing off the issues with climate change
Correct me if I am wrong but the adaptation time is normally longer then a few decades. It is more like a few centruries or even thousands and millions of years. This is all going to freakishly fast. Remember the dino's? That happend rather quickly...and bye bye.
The theory of evolution by natural selection is completely meaningless. If it were true, we wouldn't have so many, how to put, not very bright folks like you lurking around today.
The Great Barrier Reef is one of the most amazing places on the planet. A true underwater wonderland with a fascinating ecosystem.
and its getting destroyed
Not for long 😢
If they had shown a record of the last 20k years of sea level rises due to climate change it would show that the Great barrier reef was 130 m above sea level until relatively recently.
@@_baseplate Wrong 🤡
@@_baseplate by idiots fishing, fak all to do with global warming, have a google for "milankovitch cycle", its that. not humans
Seeing bleached coral is something that makes me sad in a way I can’t really explain.
Yeah, so sad. It’s almost like this planet we live on has evolved millions of times over billions of years. Imagine how utterly insane we are believing we can stop it from evil wing or that we are the reason why it’s still evolving?
It always happens and is natural. Corals release bacteria and other growth every few years, to make room for new growth. That is what give coral its amazing colours. Take a look at the site "Reef Rebels" if you want facts from a scientist who has lived all his life on the GBR and studies it for decades.
@@joebeezy9471Dogs are a mascot in terms of proof that humans have an impact on evolution.
Coral bleaching is actually at a low and generally caused by freshwater run off in qld. Nothing to do with temps.
its a natural process it goes through every few decades. Come back in 6-12 months and the coral is back again, but now with different microbial bacteria living on it and hence, probably a different colour.
Take a look at "Reef Rebels" Channel here on YT, if you want FACTUAL info.
This summer, I have planted 23 mango trees. Each of us should plant and nurture a tree to good health. It would do wonders for our planet.
Are they autochthonous of the country you are living in?
Can I have a mango 🥭
that’s sounds great, proud of you !
@@avasjournal can I Ava pint of Carling please
@RegiyThornton lol 😂
We’ve been hearing this for 20 years. Hello.
Yeah my uncle was told smoking was bad for 20 years as well. Then when his lungs failed he finally believed them and try to fix it. Want to guess how that turned out?
@@trickslies844I guess he "can't breathe"!!
I’ll believe climate change is a threat when the government starts denying it. Until then, I put it in the category of things they use to take power and wealth.
Longer. They’ve been saying the climate is going to kill us all since the 1970s. But this time they’re right, right? Sureeeee
@@trickslies844climate changes. That’s how it works. Believing we can stop it from changing is pure insanity.
You always notice the climate change skeptics are always absent from these videos were the evidence is right in front of our eyes and it is so devastating for our natural world and the wonders in it.
I dived there recently - looked better than it has done in years. But that's not newsworthy
@@MargWilkinson The few good places are still there. Do you think the diving operators are gunna take you plebs to the crap locations , Maaaarg?
@@ceeemm1901 you've got plenty of roos loose in your topic paddock. 344,400 square kilometres of reef exist. Get a grip ya dumb woke greeny
@@MargWilkinson well as long as scientist Marg inspected the whole reef and thinks it's all good...
th-cam.com/video/24kGGAVDslE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=NcOUkbwRm5GaD1sa
Looks like your the negligent one here.
Seeinf so many ignorant comments here just proves that we are doomed. It's not even enraging at this point, just really really sad 😢
People really think their food is produced in the supermarket.
It's winter in Australia, shut it
@@Aloh-od3ef It's not that simple. Some places were warmer, while others were cooler than present day temperatures. The circumstances were different, as there weren't 8+ billion people on the planet who relied on a steady supply of food. Quality of life was not great for the population of the time.
Chemtrails and weather warfare by the elites
@@brmadden895 what's your point?
@@shwnshts9469 to boil the issue down to "The earth was warmer in the medieval period and Roman period" is a massive oversimplification of a very complex problem.
People should be more concerned about nature, and reduce the climate change.
*third world countries, China/many other Asian countries/ Africa countries, and corporations and politicians who send jobs over there because there’s less climate regulations and they don’t have to pay workers as much and then act like the good guys trying to fight climate change; should be more concerned.* There fixed your comment.
No, not really, that time has come and gone...
Its now time to party and enjoy the aftermath.
Good to with that...temperatures have been going up for tens of thousands of years
@@jerroldrieger5345 at the same rate?
@@darkbozo11 Just because we can't undo the damage we already did doesn't mean we can't stop it from getting worse.
For me, this is the number one reason not to have children. Anyone born in the last 10/15 years are going to end up going to war for liveable farm land and drinkable water. They’ll despise us for our inaction and complicity, rightly so.
Yep there is already so many people choosing to not to have kids
Proudly never had children and never will. 9Bn is too many locust’s.
Not a good reason when there is no data backing this up.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Have children.
@@OldScientist yes!
This summer, I have planted 23 mango trees. Each of us should plant and nurture a tree to good health. It would do wonders for our planet. What do you think ?
Yes we saw your other comment. While it's great you did, if everyone planted mango trees, there wouldn't be biodiversity. Something we can all do that will actually help the planet is to stop buying fast fashion, for example and stop using plastic like we do. If those things changed world wide, then our planet would be radically changed.
awful. I hate trees so disgusting
@@makt122 'Each of us should plant and nurture a tree to good health. ' You assumed he meant a mango tree, maybe he just meant any tree
@@lanternlant1280 I hereby declare your trolling skills adequate. You are released from your troll bondage; go forth and be free x
@mikebasketball11 a mango is the most pure form of tree. It is the beginning of tree
They said there would be none left by now when I was at school.....it's actually bigger than now 🤣
No it's not. You shouldn't have left at Grade 3....
@@ceeemm1901th-cam.com/video/24kGGAVDslE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=NcOUkbwRm5GaD1sa
What a mess you people have made
It's crazy that the BBC give this story more airtime in the UK than it gets in Australia
This the price of the wealth of the western world
This the same barrier reef you had to admit was growing and in rude health only last year.
That's simply a lie. The repeated bleaching events are damaging the biodiversity of the Great Barrier Reef. As the planet continues to warm rapidly the bleaching events will continue. Dietzel - Long-term Shifts - Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Richards - Lizard Island - Coral Reefs.
Said no one studying it.....
@@ceeemm1901
Data sets. Tony Heller TH-cam
@@ceeemm1901 where are YOUR sources? Where is YOUR data? You don't have any data aside from TH-cam videos that what they are saying in this video is even true
The recovery is turning the reef into a monoculture since those are the few species that can better tolerate the warmer temps. But they’re more vulnerable to crown of thorns predation and disease.
So here is my glimmer of hope. I read that in the short time during covid that people were mostly off the roads and inside, there was a measurable improvement in air quality. So maybe if the world leaders can pull their heads out if their asses, doing something may not take as long as youd think.
Darling BBC, Why you are turning off comments ok UK Riot videos. Please turn ON. We Indians want you😉
Where were these people 10,000 years ago when the world was also changing, and 10,000 years before that and so on all the way back to when the earth was formed? Climate change is natural and always gonna happen. Even without us.
@DarylSolis
They rely on the human narcissist complex to sell this. If people stop believing it's all about their actions they whole narrative comes crumbling down.
Human civilization - crucially, our food systems - have developed during a period of climate stability. It is not going to handle this rate of change well. Neither will most ecosystems.
"Life on Earth" in a broad sense will eventually adjust and recover, of course. The next intelligent species might have a harder timer of it, given that we've extracted and dispersed so many of the mineral resources that we used to climb the tech ladder (copper, tin, iron, coal).
So true
So are you volunteering to go back to living like a caveman? Because that would solve both our problems.
it took 10.000 years for the average temp to go up 2 degrees and end the last proper iceage. We are now adding another 2 over the course of a century . The idea that we have no impact on this is short bus thinking
@@trickslies844 Funny how these people think climate scientists are all liars, but when these same scientists say the climate changed 10,000 years ago, they're suddenly NOT liars.
Everyones crying about burning coal, but nobodys crying for the poor souls whos digging the coal. This world is going straight to hell with a change upon us so terrifying, so profound, so scary that not many can actually see whats REALLY going on in our world and whats REALLY coming upon our existence.
@@TheCosmicRealm3
I AM 80 YEARS OLD, SO I DON'T GIVE A SHIT.
CO2 have both a corrosive/abrasive and a warm dividing effect. The empirical experiment by placing an ice cube in fresh water of room temperature and an ice cube in plain sparkling water (with only extra CO2, no extra sugar, salt...) with same room temperature show that the ice cube in the latter melts first - or rather the "melting" starts with a lot of energetic CO2 bubbles hitting the ice cube causing eddies breaking and mixing currents near the ice cube, tearing it faster down.
Opposite what we get with the fluids of low (fridge) temperature - then the ice cube in fresh water melts first. CO2-molecules transfer heat among the molecules through water layers of a bit higher temperature - these layers are less dense than the melting cool water, meaning the heat transfer is easier to happen in warm layers. The nature rule of least resistance. After some time there is so much cool water that it suddenly collides with the warm layers, so we get more rapid melting. But that's too late.
But if we introduce a little stirring and do the experiments again, we get same melting time!
So we should avoid having flat sea beds (by trawling) surrounding coral reefs, but have a lot of different high stones (or rough terrain) nearby to get enough eddies there (levelling by better mixing of cool and hot currents) - then less stratified water that cause more damage by sudden warm currents hitting the coral reefs.
Figure out how to make solar heating, like a fish tank heater you could control the water temps with solar! Just a thought.
Thank you for showing that Coral Reefs go through a succession 1º 2º... etc... phases as well? much like forest succession after a burn? Is that what is being implied? Thank you..
So 500 years ago the water temperatures were warrmer than now is that what there saying?
No, the core samples only go back that far. It's far smaller than getting an ice core for example
@@TheCrimzor they don't know jack sh!t
*they're
Proof it
Danny reflection on the ceiling burns out on you when you said that 🤣🤣🤣
It's a good thing that Australia's aborigines left such accurate thermometers and perfect records on the cave walls. The English came in 1788 and continued the daily temperature measurements. We can hardly predict the weather for the next 8 weeks - but we know exactly how warm the sea was there 400 years ago.🤣
You thought the temps were on cave walls? You seem to have the grasp on the topic as well as the average conservative.
Where are they getting this 400 years idea? If your records really go back to 1788, that's only 236 years. And worldwide, records started in 1880. Where are they getting this 400 years number?
@@makt122 did you even watch the video?
At 1:11 it showed them drilling into coral reefs to analyse the chemical makeup of the coral in the past. It's like studying tree rings to tell what sort of conditions happened in previous years.
Surely that's not too hard to understand?
@@diannehogan7605 that is not a way to do this type of research. It's pseudoscience
@@makt122 No it's not.
They analyse the recent layers and compare it to the temperatures that were recorded in those years.
Then they use that to work out what conditions were like before temperature recordings were possible.
Sounds pretty straightforward to me.
So, why is it growing? Also, not hotter than it was 100 years ago
Find another video, troll
@MrVARhythm Trawl, was the word you were looking for. Why are you so afraid?
If the oceans are rising, why did Obummer buy a seaside mansion? 🤷🏿
Man, the right-wing is just amazing aren’t they.
The property isn’t a sea level. It’s significantly above sea level for Martha’s Vineyard. So there are a lot of right-wing media who are lying. Or they’re declaring things true when they don’t know what they’re talking about. I wonder which it is?
The logic displayed in some of the articles about this is just astounding. For instance, anyone who enjoys or goes to the beach must not believe in climate change. Wow. That’s kind of like saying that if you own a gun but don’t carry it around then you’re a hypocrite because you don’t think the gun is valuable for personal safety. Or like a weatherman telling everyone it’s going to be hot that day but then they wear a suit and tie (obviously they must be lying or a hypocrite!). So I guess that means that if I believe in climate change but drive a car that uses gasoline I’m a hypocrite? Or that anyone who believes illegal immigration is a big problem but then doesn’t demand that every contractor they hire (to paint, to cut their lawn, to clean the community pool, to clean their office, to repair their) provide proof of citizenship-they must be a hypocrite, right?
The OP is amazing: “the theory of human-caused climate change.” OP, it’s not a theory. We have theories about what elements have the most impact or how quick it will develop or how much extreme weather we’ll see. But there is no “theory of human-caused climate change” OP because we’re already seeing it. Calling that a theory is like saying it’s a theory that your parents conceived you…um, no, you already exist.
By the way, something we don't know about gravity, it was scary...
What are you on about?
Surprise to see comments turned on for the BBC!
Interesting that we are just supposed to take their word for it and they give no data to back it up. Worst in 400 years? Can we see the records? Because records didnt really start until less than 150 years ago. So where is the source? Cite your sources and data.
They explain they combined proxy data within the chemistry of the choral, and historical records. If you want to see the specific data, you can look up the study online. It's not like it's hidden anywhere.
Never going to happen. If the climate gestapo had to admit that things are improving somewhere, the funding vanishes. It’s critical to the second home on the Mediterranean that the heavy pumping of taxpayers money into ‘research’. And critical that it can massage facts into a dystopian outlook. It’s my second time around with these people. We had “the ice age is coming” back in the day. 46 years in the energy industry taught me much.
@@dannypembroke2372 you are absolutely right
@@brmadden895 combined?! So basically they made it up
@@makt122 Again, you can look up the study and see the data & methodology involved in the calculation.
Reported as misinformation
Nothing changes if nothing changes and nothing is changing for the better. Our overshoot is continuing at an ever increasing rate.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
If people truly cared about environment we would all live in communal style hi-rises. Nobody would own personal vehicles, electronics etc.
Because it’s easier to worry than do something?
This is a lie. The great garrier reef is healthy as ever.
In fact.. thriving...
The Dunning-Kruger effect occurs when a person's lack of knowledge and skill in a certain area causes them to overestimate their own competence.
@@disguy6556 I suppose you think C02 is a pollutant? hahaha
That's simply not true. The repeated bleaching events are damaging the biodiversity of the GBR. Dietzel - Long-term Shifts - Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Richards - Lizard Island - Coral Reefs.
@faithingod5533 Anthropogenic CO2 emissions are rapidly warming the planet. The Great Barrier Reef is suffering from bleaching events nearly every year. We have to stop this uncontrolled experiment on the planet's Climate.
Bummer
So you have records of temperature taken 400 years ago?
they literally explain that they find chemical evidence of the climate within the coral cores.
You didnt even watch the video did you 🤦♂
yep.......and even further back than that.
You must be a beginner at this sort of thing.
Ya we all know. Tell it to the third world countries, China/many other Asian countries/ Africa countries, and corporations/politicians who send jobs over there because there’s less regulations and they don’t have to pay workers as much and then act like the good guys trying to fight climate change. Oh and yourselves (the media) for not calling them out💁♂️.
Exactly! Tell it to the Chinese who are killing their rivers by dumping blue dye in them from jeans factories
Who took the temperature 400 year ago ? Have the polar ice caps melted yet and are the Maldives under water yet ?
@jimoconnor2594
Why is the climate changing on Mars, Jupiter, Venus etc....
Reefs can live up to 10,000 years old. Pretty sure there is technology to know through the layers of the sediments the temperature centuries ago. Just like they can unveil the levels of CO2 in snow. No wonder we are where we're at, these people are literal 🐵's
Do you do any research before saying stupid things
@@christianmccann9400no they don't. They know everything, apparently.
@@cosmo588 The coral reefs have layers of sediments. Each layer contains information of what the water was like at that time. That's how they do it with ice and are able to understand what was happening thousands of years ago. Science is hard, it's simpler and easier to not think at all, we know.
Biomass power station produced four times emissions of UK coal plant, says report
I hate trees they need to go and you’re vulgar if you like them at all
Climate change & extinction of life.
ITS TO LATE!
Water weight displacement has a tremendous affect on continental positions.
As The ice melts the location of the water changes and applies pressure on different regions around the world causing subduction zones to accelerate advancing the movement of geographical regions.
As the tundra warms up it is releasing 2X more carbon into our atmosphere than what currently exists. the rate of carbon release increases as the tundra warms up while the increased carbon levels speed up the tundra thaw rate advancing the ice melt progression Speed.
Alignment with solar entities also affect the push and pull affect on the planet also contributing to regional movements of land mass.
Over this next 10 years you will see mass movement of continents around the world as the ice in the north and south melt while displacing the weight through water distribution.
The weight of the ice won’t be there anymore causing the land mass to rise and the water will relocate to the equator adding weight affecting the shape of the earth resulting in extensive land mass movement.
Atmospheric pressure will also be a contributing factor as there will be more water evaporation and condensation with precipitation all over the earth.
The earth crust is floating and being recycled over time.
Spring and autumn are much shorter seasons compared to a decade ago.
2027-2034 are going to be a period of time where mass effect on planetary events/climate change will dramatically disrupt global agriculture.
Add into the equation the unpredictable forest fires, the ongoing wars igniting oil fires and the possible use of nuclear weapons while Factoring in the radiation we are currently subjecting our atmosphere to with cell phone towers, wifi routers, and 5-6G satellites. it seems futile combating the inevitable.
As the ice melts from the north and south the water displacement around earth will redistribute weight on tectonic plates all over the world.
This will accelerate the movement of subduction zones causing massive earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and continental shifts.
The extra water will lead to excessive rain/storms causing landslides and flooding everywhere advancing the severity of the temperatures, wind speeds, humidity and electrical activity.
The Hudson Bay will eventually rupture the North American continent from the Hudson Bay to the Mississippi all the way to the Gulf of Mexico.
The subduction zone’s on the west coast will slide under the continent.
Mount Saint Helens and Yellowstone super volcano will erupt.
We are already seeing this in process with earthquakes, flooding and volcanoes most recently in Japan, Russia, Italy, Iceland, Hawaii, China, east central North America and India.
It’s recommended to be 500km away from oceans, 500ft above sea levels, 500km away from subduction zones and 500 km west of any volcanic zones.
These will be the safest places but you will still have to figure out how you are going to sustain yourself in the recommended area’s.
Global mass migration is inevitable. Billion’s or people and animals will perish and food shortages will be overwhelming. Diseases will be unprecedented.
In addition consider what’s going to happen to all the nuclear power plants, weapons and waste with mass depopulation.
Sadly Tibet, New Zealand and Antarctica are probably going to be the best places to be.
Earth probably won’t be inhabitable for the next 30k years.
Greed, pursuit of power, ego and selfishness is the downfall of humanity as we enter the extinction of life on earth.
Say goodbye to the reef guys, it’s as good as gone. Say goodbye to most of our beloved wildlife, it’ll be gone if you make it to old age. Nothing will change
No it's not. It will recover.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Yaaay!! 🎉🎉😂😂
The population is increasing every year. wasting a lot of natural resources and producing a lot of toxic waste.
How can we solve climate change from the root cause of population expansion ?
Thanks
Stop driving and flying then...and vote green.
YOU 1ST
Wasted effort if the rest of the world is building coal power plants….which they are. And we can’t stop them. We are more screwed than you know if you think stopping oil would make a dent.
I can't drive, I've been on a plane about 5 times in 25 years and voted green in the election. It's boring though 🥱
I hate the earth and the environment
Went and had a look for myself - it looked better than it did 50 years ago, so I'm more inclined to believe the report at th-cam.com/video/24kGGAVDslE/w-d-xo.html. The problem is that good news on the reef is not good for funding.
Dr Peter Ridd got kicked out of JCU because he's a shill. How gullible are you?
Thank you Marg. People from Queensland know that the reef is in great shape and this is all a rouse to get funding and enrage the woke mob
Peter Ridd got sacked from JCU because he's a shill. You really pick the goodies for your sciencey info, eh?
Yes!
Bullshit
Fake news, the reef is constantly dying and respawning and there is no need for any concern. It's called life
Isnt it interesting that people who are not scientists know more than people who work in the industry. When you get sick - do you go to the mechanic to get treated - or if you go to a doctor - do you tell him the treatment you want?
I live near the reef. If you’re concerned you should come and see how beautiful it is
@@growdaddy4281 I dont care where you live - its what you know. You are speaking about a local area - not the whole reef and the bleaching hasnt started yet. Areas of the reef are affected differently - its not a uniform thing. Tell me about it after it happens
@@TedBear1954 You poor worry old wart! Scientists nowadays believe that a man can become a woman if he mutilates his genitals - Just because a scientist said it, doesn’t make it true. Hundreds of years after we will be dead, my family will still be enjoying the reef. Have a pleasant day champion!
If only your dad hadn't left when you were three and mum didn't have all those "uncles" come and visit, you'd be rool bwainy now.
The world still haven't learn anything from back in 2022 because that was the worst heatwaves 🥵as the temperatures went up has cause a lot of fire, drought and deaths. If the people of the world have just take this climate change very seriously and do something about it then maybe the year wouldn't have gotten worst.
Still wasn't record temps in most places. Most high records are from 30, 40, 50 years ago. And that's only using 150 years of data, which isn't a long period. So our recent temps are not concerning since they aren't breaking records.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
@@OldScientistyou again? How is it possible for a person to be this dumb!
@@makt122 Thats false on the record heat bits and also ignores the fact that Individual heat spot records are not the same as average heat temperature records
@@trickslies844 you misunderstand
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Thank you! Someone with actual data saying something intelligent. Instead of this fear mongering from BBC
I worked in Marine Park (4 years) Management at Ningaloo MP with AIIMs researches. Honest and truthfull Discussion was alwYs the same. The reefs are fine ...why the scare mongering.? Publicly they push the barrow to get research funding.
as usual most of what you’re saying is wrong. While it’s true parts of the GBR have recently recovered, it’s not the greatest coverage ever recorded reefwide. The part about biodiversity is even more blatantly wrong since the corals that are recovering are nearly a monoculture which are particularly susceptible to crown of thorns predation and disease
For those who find this comment convincing, this is the same person who repeatedly misrepresents and misunderstands the sources he cites. A previous argument of his made clear he doesn’t even know the difference between a linear and an accelerating trend. If you don’t see that as a red flag you’re hopeless
@@AA-vi1cc Give some data to prove what you say.
That is what has been said 10 years ago as well. Sadly vested interests are what hinder action on climate change... Starting with the Murdoch press...
We’ve had mini ice ages as well, what would we be doing if we were going into one now?
The planet was slightly cooling for six thousand years and heading towards another glaciation until the beginning of the Industrial Era when it began rapidly warming due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions. CO2 levels are the highest for at least two million years, probably longer.
The next glaciation has been put on indefinite hold because of CO2 levels.
Yeah, and what if leprechauns started breeding like rabbits a began chewing our shins off? And what if the aliens made all our tyres disappear?....and what if...
We won't have the next ice age until thousands of years into the future
@@ceeemm1901what if you just shut up?
It’s earths core.
8,000 views and 150 likes… very obvious how awful the bbc reporting has become.
Really? Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson get millions of views and they're fwits.
@@ceeemm1901says you
@@makt122 Says Joe "I am not a smart man" Rogan
@@ceeemm1901 you’ve never actually listened to them have you? Just little cuts from people who say their fwits who cut out only a select part to make them seem like fwits. Also you played yourself with your comment, saying how they get millions of views, while bbc and media like it are struggling to get a few thousand even with all their bots. That speaks for itself who the real fwits are (sadly it seems your one of them).
@@ceeemm1901 oh your a bot account too
Hold it a second, lads --- not that I dispute your overall assertion, but were instruments even available 4 centuries ago to make such precise measurements?
They drilled into coral to collect samples. This gives evidence of the conditions in the past. The video shows them doing it.
@@diannehogan7605 Science is not infallible -- global warming wasn't to be a problem til late 21st century. It's already killed thousands of people, burned off millions of acres of forest worldwide; destroyed cities...Whose "evidence of the conditions in the past" is prepared to put a stop to this, Ms Hogan? BTW -- do you still drive your own car?
There are reports of record growth for three consecutive years on the Great Barrier Reef and it has the most coral in over 36 years.
If they stopped chemtrails then we wouldnt be in this mess weather warfare
No such thing.
@@FrostekFerenczy what's no such thing mate
@@FrostekFerenczy your governments want you dead mate
Bogans and Chemtrails, hahaha. Someone should write a sit-com about that.
This is dangerous for the reef. The world needs to step up their plans in finding quick solutions. Not much is being done.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Thanks, China 🇨🇳 for
- building more and more *coal-fired power plants,* and
- burning more and more *fossil fuel.*
How about the country like Australia which sells fossil fuels
Well, you need cheap stuff so yes, thanks China.
Who's gonna stop the rising temperature of the sea if its cause is from the shift of rotation axis rather than fossil fuel combustion? Lives under water is not the only one to be destined to dooms. On the land, in the air, nothing can survive without paying serious price for that. It's been predicted so long that we should pull through the most harrowing moments of survival in this era. If the climate change stems from the rotation of the axis and in which I believe is the true cause of all disasters impending soon.
Go look at the new report reviewing BBC climate "reporting". It's a long list of hysterical misinformation.
Human activities have been the main driver of climate change 🤔🤔🤔
Yes
Never
Bullshit
Well done, BBC!
😂😂😂😂
There is no other way to protect climate. If you disagree? Please place reason of climate change. We all open to listening!
Most are not open to listening actually. They go with the trends of what they're told
We all have it comin.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Silence you handberger lunch meat light
Another day, another lies. 😂
Oh well. At least these scientists will continue to get Government funding. And that’s what really matters. 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Who said they have to work for free? The Fossil Fuel Industry gets tax payer subsidy......
How much does pIG oil pay you per comment
Coral is being replanted in the Great Barrier Reef but it will take years for them to mature.
Only if the temp goes down....
Well it's already growing back so...
0:10
We certainly know, yet no action will come
Your fault
Good! 🤣🤣 I hate the environment
Come out.
The idea that man can control the climate is something of a stretch of the imagination.
No, you just lack the imagination.
Repetition repetition repetition.
And governments have to act now... And justvwhat will they do - sacrifice their cocktail ice cubes and toss them in the ocean.
Okay but do we REALLY know what the temperature of that body of water was over 400 years ago for comparison??? I doubt it.
Like growth rings on trees you can examine what conditions were like years ago. Even layers of rock and dirt show if fires or cold periods impacted ages ago.
@@oo0Spyder0oo that doesn't explain how a temperature could be determined....
@@DoylesDigshave you even researched the answer your looking for or have you already made up your mind?
@@cosmo588 I don't want to research it I was just hoping someone had a clear logical answer as to how it's possible to determine such a thing...
Develop countries are the most green house gas emitted countries for the last decades. So they must take an immediate steps to reduce their emissions.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
@@OldScientist
Thank you for your informative comment.
Who was recording the temperature 400 years ago?
Temperature is estimated using proxy data. The biodiversity of the GBR is being severely damaged by the repeated bleaching events. Dietzel - Long-term Shifts - Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Richards - Lizard Island - Coral Reefs.
As the planet continues to warm rapidly due anthropogenic CO2 emissions the bleaching events will continue.
They can measure the weather by the rings on a 400 year old tree.
Yes, the coral tree. Makes sense.
@NoWindNoSunNoPower Never heard of proxy data?
@NoWindNoSunNoPower every year cycle a tree gets rings. And the air temperature can indicate water temperature and also thousand year old glaciers temperature layers can indicate cycles. That's partly how we know how crocs lived in an Antarctica at time where it was swamp
More BBC propaganda
Foolish remark.
Nonsense. Report tje truth.
I hope it’s true because I HAAATE the environment it needs to go
Who believes the BBC anyway
BBC observation with climate change 😐😐😐
It's a goner. Stop pretending like something will be done.
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Says frosty the snowman
what year was this video made--1992?
BBC there's Ukraine invading Russia in case you missed it.
As of 2022, China 🇨🇳 was by far the world's largest *coal* consumer with 55% of energy use, an increase of 2% of the total energy from the year before.
So China is accelerating the use of coal despite it having signed the Paris agreement.
Just face it if we make it to 2030 ur lucky
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
Lucky gucky sink drain
It ( coral reefs) survived ice age, tropical age, don’t worry
Yeah bro, don't worry! These boomers are so betarded it's almost like they are the cause of it all.
And what are your qualifications? Why should I trust the hot take of some ignorant, arrogant guy in a youtube comment section rather than an expert who knows infinitely more than you on this subject?
@@disguy6556 what are theirs? Can’t you conclude for yourself?
@@disguy6556 hahaha its self evident you muppet.
Too many Vehicles on the Roads!. There needs to be a No Drive Month! Only emergency Vehicles permitted on the roads!. You can Walk to work! or use Public Transportation! Bicycles! Electric Scooter!. Too many Trucks! also!. Bring back HORSE AND CARRIAGES!.
Climate crisis😂
My sincere thanks for sharing it.
Sharry in the chair
All countries particularly those developed ones should follow China's way on implementing green energy development as soon as possible.
China doesn't have anything beneficial for the rest of the world
The Coral has been there for millions of years but you think you need to save it
global
boiling 🤕🤕🤕
Goodness*
🔥🇮🇱🇺🇲🔥⚠️🎺
.
It’s ok, it always grows back greater……yr already a part of the problem with all the geoengineering programmes for decades, no wonder yr screwing most things up 🤫
So what.🤣
Based
Great. Warm swimming and no sharks. May the heat continue.
Super awesome
yup mass air conditioning years is working
Parts
Who cares??
bbc there in reef is threat
IF you believe in The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection... adaptation (which I do, but with more than a nod to the contribution of mutation) then you have to believe that corals will eventually adapt to warmer water... one less thing to worry about, then!
Yes but evolution takes years, even hundreds of years. They have adapted to changes in the past, but this change is happening so rapidly they cannot keep up. Stop brushing off the issues with climate change
Correct me if I am wrong but the adaptation time is normally longer then a few decades. It is more like a few centruries or even thousands and millions of years. This is all going to freakishly fast. Remember the dino's? That happend rather quickly...and bye bye.
There is still a good chance of some species not being able to evolve and going extinct
The theory of evolution by natural selection is completely meaningless. If it were true, we wouldn't have so many, how to put, not very bright folks like you lurking around today.
Who cares about stupid coral reefs .. we should give priority to economic devolopment .
your sick
Based. I hate the environment
@@guitarstella1cry about it 🤣🤣🤣
Scott Morisson 🙂👏👏👏 . A strong leader for a strong nation 👏👏👏🙂
Not my problem. Keep using my air conditioner.😘
Based. It’s not worth it to solve global warming