No Sir, I Was Entitled! - Law & Order
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
- Stream Law & Order on Peacock: pck.tv/46lNAcm
From Season 5, Episode 11 "Guardian" - After the body of a young female junkie is identified as the daughter of a wealthy family, Briscoe and Logan try to find out who left her to die in the yard of a day-care centre.
Subscribe: / @lawandordernbc
This is the official TH-cam channel for Law & Order. Watch all of the official clips from the series, some of the best moments from within the criminal justice system, where the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: The police, who investigate crime, and the district attorneys, who prosecute the offenders.
Watch Law & Order on Google Play: bit.ly/2IbIu71
Watch Law & Order on iTunes apple.co/2Ia46QZ
#LawAndOrder
![ลองสั่งของจากแอพ temu ถูกจริงหรอ?? ( part : 1/2 ) [โกงไหมครับ ep.89 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RTcZSQTiDZw/mqdefault.jpg)
I miss Jack McCoy's eyebrows flying about like a pair of angry caterpillars as he cross-examines people.
Made me spit my tea 😂
😝
😂😂😂😂😂
Watch Grace and Frankie, he still does plenty of lecturing and eyebrow flying in that show.
Those are my favorite eyebrows!!!
"They found Marajuana in my room"
"So you're a drug addict?"
ME: "Oh come on, just just because the kid indulges in weed doesn't mean you have to automatically jump to-"
"I only smoked Heroin once or twice a month."
ME: "Okay, never mind. Kid knows how to escalate"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Weed is from the earth
It was the 90’s they thought Herion and Weed were the same
@@camelnat bruce greene is that you? 🤣🤣🤣
This is why witnesses need legal counsel, although it appears there's no amount of coaching in the world that would prevent the kid from blurting out his heroin use and thus incriminating himself.
"Nothing is inevitable, Mr. Cayman, except for your residence at one of our correctional facilities. "
*BWAHAHAHAHA!!* God, I miss Jack. He knew every loophole.
The evidence did come out in pre-trial discovery but was disallowed as proof for the crime due to a procedural glitch. As evidence challenging the defendant's credibility, however, it was admissable. But it wasn't any kind of surprise for the defence.
@ jade fire.
That is true since all his lines he says are written that way.
Wow I could make some good comments too if someone wrote them for me too.
Wow
@@williamsanderson7971 Well of course it's a fictional character. Don't be obtuse.
@@jadefire2817 what a nerd answer you gave
@@williamsanderson7971 And your point *is?*
Ahh, so that's how Kevin's family could afford that trip to Paris in Home Alone. His uncle was a high-powered New York attorney!
I get the reference, but in truth, the uncle was portrayed as a leech who didn't pay for the trips. Apparently, the high-powered attorney was a skinflint.
I remember that character. “You better not wreck my vacation you little sour Puss! Your dad is paying good money for it!” Kevin then burns him by stating that he didn’t wanna ruin the cheapskates fun
Kevin's dad paid for it
Ha ha ha Gd one sir
Kevin's dad is the compromised police officer in Sopranos. That's how it was paid for.
I'm surprised the defense attorney didn't tell that first witness, "Look what you did you little jerk!"
i understood that reference
I knew it had to be Uncle Frank!
GET OUTTA HERE YA LITTLE PERVERT!!!
"oh i dont wanna spoil your flight mr cheapskate"🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ah yes, Heroin, the classic weekend drug
Is it really?
@jax Caulfield ever seen trainspotting?
It can be
@jaxcaulfield7071 before fent, yes, it could be. A habit doesn't form overnight.
@@jonathanwpressman Playing with fire there, jonathan. Leave it all alone.
At his age, any sentence is pretty much a life sentence.
Nice
The actor was actually only 20 years old.
Not while this episode was filmed, but at some point in his life previously.
The actor was only in his early 60s when this episode was made. If his character was about the same age and got out in 10 years (after parole in 8 plus 2 for larcency), he still probably had a decade or more left to life a mostly free man, versus a minimum 25 year sentence, which would have been a virtual life sentence.
@@mumblesbadly7708He aged horribly my lord.
Prisons don't have 'Senior Wards'.
He'll be just another old guy to victimize.
The acting of the witnesses are always good, you can tell which questions they prepped for and which are not just by how they answer.
duh .. this is a SCRIPTED TV show .... not a news broadcast !!! so many Darwin Award winners here
The first witness (the young guy) also played serial killer Gregory Yates a few seasons ago on Law & Order SVU!
@@rhuephus they know it's scripted that's why they said the acting was good, but you can still tell based on their acting what the character was supposed to have prepared for or not in the show's universe
The line about touching a hot plate made me laugh.
you too
Every actor has been on this show more than once. That witness later plays Gregory Yates a serial killer we first learn about on Chicago Fire who then kills Nadia from Chicago PD after attempting to frame Will from Chicago Med who is finally caught on Law & Order SVU later escaping and finally dying on Chicago PD. This Universe has expanded so much over the years.
How did we go from weed all the way to heroin? Lol come on dawg.
When people told him weed was a gateway drug, he believed them and used them for that reason.
He didn’t even need to bring up heroin since they ask about weed, he shot himself in the foot
I've knew a guy who started out smoking weed and the next thing I knew he was using magic mushrooms. Apparently the weed just wasn't doing it for him even with larger quantities. I can only hope for his sake that he never moves down to heroin.
I’ve had family members and a couple of friends that started doing weed then tried other stronger stuff . A few stared on prescription drugs before they went to weed. Not everyone who try’s weed or does weed will go to stronger more dangerous drugs . But you can’t think automatically because they do weed they won’t or not doing stronger more dangerous drugs because I know for a fact that’s not true.
What all the way? Is there some a list of drugs one must graduate from first before moving to the next? Oops skipped acid, no meth for you.
I hope others recognize the judge as U.S. Rep. Jose Serrano. The longest serving Puerto Rican-American in Congress.
I believe he was a congressman by this time, but I'm not certain.
Kind of like Sen. Fred Thompson, eh?
A career politician with a hobby in show business. Nice!
i knew i recognized him
We don’t but thank you
Really? I didn’t know that!
he was, he and Fred Thompson acted while still serving in Congress but only Thompson was starring…Serrano was in his third term then
6:04 "Nothing is inevitable [...] except for your residency at one of our correctional facilities."
Damn I miss the dialogue of old L&O.
The best McCoy-ism was in the episode involving the college girl running an on-campus prostitution ring from which one of the girls ended up dead. Father helped her skip the jurisdiction when arrest was imminent: "I can't believe she had to take an emergency flight to Switzerland in the dead of night because the ski runs were melting."
Me too
Was anyone else waiting for the defense attorney say "Look what you did you little jerk!!!"
Yep
🤣🤣🤣
Yep!!! good old cheapskate uncle frank XD
@@WhiteWorgenCorp all lawyers are bloodsucking cheapskates
“I drove her to the hospital” you... want a cookie? You don’t get points for that.
To be fair if he was called, didn't lie about seeing her and then actually tried to get her to a hospital and she died on the way or when they go there, he would of been fine.
Jack McCoy really had that men’s wardrobe taste: black and grey suits, light blue and white dress shirts, and a variety of neckties.
*_"I WAS ENTITLED!!!_* And right there is why he deserves to serve the rest of his life in prison.
Given his age, even with parole, the deal could very well be the rest of it.
FYI: The judge was played by retiring Congressman Jose Serrano (D)NY-15
Not the first time a retiring congressman was a character in the L&O universe. A former senator was an ADA I think.
Ps: not from the US and not a Full time L&O follower. If I start to watch with dedication I will not have a life
@@otaviofrn_adv Fred Dalton Thompson actually began on L&O as Arthur Branch while he was still a sitting Senator from Tennessee.
Serrano didn't retire until 2018, so he was a sitting House member during this episode.
@@DNSKansas Really enjoyed watch Thompson in his role on L&O.
Who?
I'm supposed to believe that guy, at his age, couldn't name a *_single_* hospital in his area?
McCoy knows the city like the back of his hand, if he named a hospital that was out of the way, he would've called him out on it.
He can probably name the closest hospital to his area -- but the closest hospital to whatever out-of-the-way back alley he dumped the victim in is more of a stretch.
Because he probably didn’t take her to one. McCoy would have said he check the records of every hospital and there was no record anywhere.
That’s “Yates” who killed Nadia in the Chicago P.D./SVU Crossover.
Also Alicia's brother in The Good Wife.
Scott Holder and the brother on The Good Wife.
Thank you I kept staring and was like he looks so dang familiar. Aww man I kind of loved Yates during Chicago P.D and SVU crossover.
@@VC-Toronto .... Owen the school teacher/college instructor 🙂
Isn’t he the doctor from Woodbridge in the walking dead?
Something I like is how the attorney's keep things cordial despite being on opposite sides. Though they can be intense when proving cases if one side is clearly going to win they admit defeat.
Yeah because next time you see them you might be the one on the wrong side of the facts. There is nothing personal in this for the lawyers.
They aren't the ones who did the stupid thing that has lead their clients to be in court.
Lawyers need to get on with each other or they'll go mad.
If anything tv shows tend to be unrealistic in that they show lawyers taking things personally, which is a really bad thing for their clients (and their duty to the court). The show Suits is terrible in this regard because the lawyers all seem to take their clients problems personally
Do we REALLY think juries judge AND ignore such technicalities!?
Also…Marijuana to heroin is a HUGE leap of conjecture. Didn’t anyone tell the defendant that…?
🤷♀️
Katie's mother has a point. Often the best way to make sure an addict ceases abuse is to cut them off from loved ones. As tough as it sounds, it'll help.
@FRANCO PEREZ Thankfully no. And I hope I'll never have to.
@FRANCO PEREZ I was close to a friend in high school. Her mother was a cocaine addict. Her father had to kick her out of the house for 6 years. She's still going through rehab from what I was told.
Well, cutting ties with your love ones usually means you also cut the money supply, or at least it makes more diffiult to the addict to get money more easy
@@KanaidBlack Yes
@FRANCO PEREZ Well, I'm no expert. I'm merely stating what I know. What do you know about having a loved one that's an addict?
So according to Jack McCoy, nothing is inevitable.
Take that Thanos!
Cue the IRS and Joe Black on McCoy's doorstep by morning.
3:35 Ah, yes, yet another defendant thinks he can "tell his side of the story" and somehow win the cross-examination.
No sane defence lawyer would put his client on the stand when there has been evidence of guilt suppressed before the trial. By asserting anything on the stand, he busts open the door for the prosecution to use ANYTHING to rebut his claims... Besides, the case was clearly going for either an acquittal or a hung jury. There was no chance 12 jurors would vote to convict.
Unfortunately even Perry Mason would be hard-pressed to override the arrogance of a client determined to tell his story his way when he's sure he can beat anything. I'm sure counsel advised very strongly not to testify, and his client ignored the advice.
“She doesn’t have to answer that.” Lol that bama is ruthless.
Lol McCoy move was🔥and defense attorney knew "Jack your office in 10mins"
7:19 gotta love that classic Jack McCoy "wtf is wrong with you" face😂
His righteous indignation is AWESOME, lol!
Regardless as to what the situation was, his job was to save her...and not let her die.
Human decency
@@yoonginavy4967 actually what he did was decent. When you become that level of a pathetic leeching degenerate addict you’re way better off.
I miss Jack’s little smiles when he knows he’s won.
I just wanted to say: this is the first Hispanic judge that I've seen on the show and this was the 90s! lol
How do you know he is
Hispanic??????
@@matthewforsyth284
FUCK YOU DICKHEAD
@@nycnj6167 That is a good point. There are Spanish people who look white.
@@nycnj6167 It was Congressman Jose Serrano who played the judge. Part of his district is the South Bronx.
@@magoo9279
Spanish ain't a color. Neither is Latino, Puerto Rican, Mexican or Columbian.
I can't focus on anything but Sam Waterston's 90's tastic hairstyle. Sam: Something simple please. Hairstylist: "Yes sir. This mousse will add just the slightest hint of volume." HAHA
But, oh! He’s sooo attractive!
I think his hair looks great here.
He always had great hair.
His hair is really thick, even now.
You definitely see the difference in public perception of drugs over time. All “drugs” were the same back then and there was no difference between weed and heroin.
The same people finding all drugs the same are the same people that can’t stop drinking
“They found marijuana in my room”
“So you’re an addict”
“I’m not an addict, I only smoked heroin once or twice on the weekend.”
OBJECTION!!! My witness doesn’t know how not to volunteer unnecessary and incriminating information!
Glad someone finally included the "on the weekend" part. Not that that makes this any better.
Overruled
"objection my witness can't tell marijuana from cocaine so he clearly is too dumb to do drugs"
"Junkies die!!!!" Thats the american spirit.
He wasn't wrong.
Except for the fact that junkies were brought into this world the same as we were. And rather than learning to cope with trauma and neglect in a healthy fashion, they turned to drugs. At the end of the day, drug addicts are people all the same, they have a fucking disease called “addictive personality disorder” and have been tossed aside by the world. Luckily some people recover, some don’t get the chance, I only hope the number of people who get the chance to get help get better with time
Jack, let's make this the greatest five minutes of our lives.
A young Dallas Roberts there who played Julianna Margulies's brother in the Good Wife. Also good to see Jon Cypher who was in Hill Street Blues and was "Man at Arms" in Masters of the Universe. Still going strong at 89.
My favorites were all in this episode. Logan, Briscoe, McCoy, and Kincaid.
Lyra...
My Favorites also
Jeff..... Boston
Mine too ,when briscoe left that was it for me.
Don't forget Van Buren
1) Why didn't the judge warn defense lawyer about encouraging perjury?
2) Wouldn't he have had a better deal telling the jury he panicked taking her to the hospital?
1) Who’s to say that didn’t happen off-screen.
2) He would have to have admitted to transporting her in the first place. And the fact that he lied about it before anything else already sealed his fate.
3) Why don't you shut up and go to bed?
I'm joking xD don't take me srsly
Drama show, so plays a bit loose with how the law actually works.
This was a great show. Excellent writing. Smart. Unlike today’s SVU- it’s horrible now. More about detectives than the stories
SVU hasn’t been good since Chris Meloni left.
Ratings say otherwise🤷🏾♀️
Yeah and too much computery technobabble nonsense. I miss when it was normal like this.
@@allbutperfectare you always so confident when you’re wrong. A simple look at the ratings would be enough. He left in season 12. 8.84 rating. No other season since then has matched that. There has been a downward trend as well.
The past five seasons have been worse then the worst of the original mainline series. The season 20 that they were canceled after.
It's just the Olivia Benson Show now.
How Sam saids arrogant at the ending 😍😍
5:30 Seems a bit sketchy. I don't think the jury is going to be able to tell the difference, they're not legal professionals. But maybe his Honor is ticked off that the defense is claiming that defendant didn't see the victim at all on the day of the crime when there is evidence to the contrary. Sometimes the "go big or go home" defense can get you in big trouble.
It is big that's why the judge called them in his chambers. And that's why the defense lawyer is so bothered and he took the deal. It just proved he is a liar which taints his credibility in the court. Nothing he will say will be easily believed. So a jury might find him guilty.
Since the defendant decided to testify in his own defence, his credibility was subject to attack, hence the evidence from the search in the car was admissible on those grounds.
@@LordZontar I don't remember the episode was the vomit in the car admitted into evidence?
@@LordZontar I don't get how talking about inadmissible evidence isn't just prejudicing the jury like as its stated goal
@@MrJstorm4 The evidence became admissible when the defendant himself opened the door to attacks on his credibility in rebuttal. This is why a good lawyer always tries to keep his idiot client from testifying on the stand.
In real life, his lawyer probably would've done his best to keep him off of the stand. If he failed there, he wouldn't have asked him a question where his choices were to either lie or incriminate himself.
Another good classic case from a good classic show.
"LOOK WHAT YA DID, YA LITTLE JERK!!"
And ‘Hill Street Blues’ fans will recognise Jon Cypher here. He had some of the funniest lines in that show as pompous police chief , and later mayor, Chief Fletcher Daniels. I’ll always remember his ‘weak rectal tissue, Frank! It’s a curse!’
Kid: marijuana in room
Attorney: you’re a drug addict!
Me: oh come on, it’s pot 🙄
Kid: I only do heroin twice a month
Me: 😬 well that escalated quickly
YES! This describes exactly how I felt! 🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ivy League schools are for the children of old money too dumb to make it in reputable universities, but rich enough to buy proof of excellence.
u literally copied someone else’s comment word for word lol
Seems pretty mind to be an addict. I always thought being an addiction was someone who indulged in the behavior almost if not every single day.
1:12 young man would portray the killer Greg Yates. Different hairstyle. McCoy knows how to win a case. Put the killer in his place
Phoenix Capricorn thank you! I knew I recognized him! According to the Law and Order Wiki, he’s played six different characters in the shows.
Berit Hogan thank you. I learned something new from you.
As Dr. Yates he was mesmerizing. I loved watching him.
I was just about to say
I hate that word ENTITLED. my dad always told me, unless you work and earned it, the only thing your entiled to is to blink and breath
Thank you! Someone with sense!
Weird... we have a whole Constitution that talks about the things we're entitled to in the US.
Dr.Yates had really good hair in the 90s
Rich old men like him are gross. Money can only do so much.
FRANCO PEREZ I agree
Money and connections can do a lot !
Yeah. FWPs.
Yup like run a country into the ground!
Man, I miss this show.
There is the mistake, don’t give a trustee discretionary control!
"he bought her drugs and stole from her"
"He bought her food and gave her a home, or would you rather he be as cold as you?"
But like....? Doesn't change the fact that he bought her drugs???
Damn Dallas Roberts has been playing weirdos on L&O for years
yep
The first man on the stand played a doctor for the governor on TWD.
Great acting!
"I thought you'd feel that way Gary, We'll do you last!"
So that's how they could go to Paris in the first Home Alone? Cool to see him at work
7:55 “I can’t recall....I didn’t do anything wrong” off why this just be laughing
The first witness (the young guy) also played serial killer Gregory Yates a few seasons ago on Law & Order SVU!
I was in my teens and early twenties, watching Law and Order between 1997 and 2007, or so. I remember these episodes, they were the best. I agreed with everything in the opinions portrayed in the series. Those were the good old days, gone forever, replaced by the post 2020 world of misguided idealism and the Tyranny of the Offended (otherwise known as cancelculture and related movements).
“Cancel culture” where no one has been damaged by it. But you were around when the right tried to ban Stern, Opie and Anthony, video games, and music? Even in these shows where they say weed is the same as heroin you agree even the facts show otherwise?
And today the guy running as the Republican candidate said he’d be a dictator day one, bragged about intervening in the DOJ, tried to say that the election was rigged when it was found he had called officials to threaten votes, and fiddled with electors, tried to stop the constitutional process of transferring power, and then said we should suspend THE CONSTITUTION to “put him in the seat of power”.
But you’re so sensitive you just care that there are people that voice opinions different than yours. What a weakling!
No wonder the country is a mess with people like you as “role models”.
Or maybe we can go back to “the good old days” when you weren’t allowed to voice an opinion woman.
I couldn't agree with you more 💯😊
This judge let’s anything happen in his court room holy shit lol imagine this irl 🤦🏻♀️
Nothing compared to the circus Lance Ito allowed his courtroom to become during the OJ trial.
Eh, nothing the judge did indicated a lack of control. A good judge does not interfere.
@@LordZontar Yeah, a homicide trial shouldn't last eight months.
I take it you never talked 1 on 1 with a judge, and it shows.
@@Saintbow Are you referring to me?
The first witness went on to live in Woodberry during the zombie apocalypse and sucking up to the Governor until said governor killed him.
I am consistently shocked how this show portrays defense attorneys. No one in their right mind will talk like that with a witness. God, can’t they ask real defense attorney for “technical supervision” as its called?
Drama show, not reality show.
I'm really starting to doubt you guys after watching real criminal cases. I've seen actual defense attorney act way worse than this without being repreimanded
My answering machine was flashing... So 90s.
1:02 I expected him to yell "Look what you did, you little jerk!"
Oh snap, Uncle Frank!
The guy on the witness stand at the beginning looks like a young Jeff Bridges, mixed with Val Kilmer.
All I know is I recognize him but I can't place him
John Ritter.
@@tomduffy3965 is that the guy on the witness stand?
Also I don't know why but I didn't see a notification of your comment. I just received a notification of a "like" just now.
His name is Dallas Roberts. He's in everything lol
He's the brother in good wife and butchered the continuity of the Law and Order Universe by playing a bunch of characters in various spin-offs throughout the years.
@@tomduffy3965it’s not John Ritter the actor is Dallas Roberts he later played the sadistic serial killer Dr Yates on crossover of Chicago PD and SVU during first season of Chicago PD.
Of course the uncle from Home Alone is the defense attorney
So on this show he is a witness but on law and order SVU, the young man on the stand is a creepy serial killer that escaped twice! I love his growth!!
Look Dr. Yates!
I like how this show has gotten up attorney’s asses about using questions to “testify” or “speculate”, and this guy can do both at once, AND prevent the witness from replying, further proving that’s what they were doing.
"Ken Blanchard entrusted me with his children." I guess he entrusted his children to the wrong person!!!
Even the attorney was ashamed of looking at the big monster coming out of him.
Omg it’s Bob from insatiables
Ewww it's Cosso no wonder that face look familiar
It's Milton from Walking Dead!
Oooh he was young
Wow that was great acting
0:25 Mr. Butterfield's great great grandson
Jack McCoy is a pure beast!!
8:09 "look what you did, you little jerk" Uncle Frank strikes again.
I think the young guy on the stand played the role of a serial killer in later episodes 🤔
Yates
@@tami6951 In Chicago PD right? The one who killed Nadia
Yes this actor appeared in at least 3 episodes of law and order before he was on law and order svu
Double windsor ...... Jack is a classic gentleman
Ian Fleming reckoned that a Windsor knot was the mark of a cad along with handkercheifs in the top pocket, suede shoes, and regimental ties.
"Tell him: Valdez is coming."
So did anyone else find it unbelievable, that this guy was stonewalling so hard then he just blurted out everything and his lawyer just stood there and let him?
No one ever said this show was realistic. Besides, both men knew that guy was guilty and that McCoy couldn't use anything he said in court anyhow.
That thumbnail looks like a constipated gremlin.
I hate when the lawyer stands in front of the jury. When it was done to me, I got really pissed and didn't pay attention.
Then you weren't responsible enough to be on a jury, you should have asked to be excused for personality flaws or an inability to follow procedure
The person above me is exactly correct. If you are telling the truth and were ACTUALLY on a jury, then you didn't do your duty. If them just standing in front of you pisses you off, maybe you should have excused yourself eh? Hopefully you are just full of it.
3:40 - Started watching Hill Street Blues a month or two ago... this one guy on the stand played the semi-recurring police chief.
I've been sitting here wracking my brain to remember who he is , big thank you!
Dr. Yates 👀😲
One thing I didn't like as much about the earlier eps of the original law and order was that they were a little too unrealistic. The lawyer basically knows he can win on appeal yet is ready to let his client serve the max. They made Jack look like he could convince anyone of just about anything.
God bless everyone.
Actually in the real world it would be difficult to win on appeal, the defense attorney's claim notwithstanding. McCoy is correct that he can impeach the credibility of the defendant on the stand since the defendant opened the door by making false assertions. Legally the jury should only evaluate the supressed evidence to find that he the defendant is liar not to show he actually committed the crime, but juries in the real world rarely make that distinction.
@@semicron5159 5:51 He points out it would never survive an appeal. If he is sure of that then letting his client do the max just seems weird.
God bless you.
@@FeedingFrenzy91 Lawyers always confidentialy say they will win when negotiating pleas to get a better deal. When McCoy said he was not afraid of an appeal, the lawyer knew he was done.
@@semicron5159 Still seems a bit unrealistic. Like the earlier eps of law and order did things that wouldn't even be legally allowed like surprising the defense with a piece of evidence when the prosecution is required to let the defense know. Like, compare the earlier ones to the later ones and the later ones at least tried to be more realistic.
Chief Fletcher Daniels!!!!
No one smokes heroin "once or twice a month" no one.
The guy at the beginning that took the stand was Milton Mamet in The Walking Dead. He was the Governor's assistant.
The guy on trial looks like the live action version of Florlo from The hunchback of Notre Dame
I'm pretty sure the guy with the weed is Milton From the walking dead. he was the Governers "Secretary" or doctor
No, your eyes are not deceiving you, that is a young Dallas Roberts who would later play Gregory Yates on SVU/Chicago PD.
Omg it’s a young Greg Yates 😂😂 and that hair
He reminds me of John Ritter.
I never realized that the DA's office is right in the court building.