To anyone who thinks what this guy did was justified: robbery is not a crime punishable by death. Even if it was, this guy isn't Judge and Jury, so he doesn't get to be the executioner. He was robbed of $12. Then he kills people who had nothing to do with the crime. How exactly does that justify what he did. He deserves life in prision. It's better than what he gave to two individuals. Even if someone robs you of $100,000 or a million, it still isn't a crime to be punished by death. And we don't have the right to choose who lives and dies. Maybe take a hard look at what you are saying and supporting.
You have a point however I believe that if you catch someone in your Home trying to rob you or your home 🏡 than you have a right to arm & ptotect yourself in that circumstance. Some people willbtry to hurt or kill you for your $ or possessions. But that man he goes back to retaliate and shot the wrong people smh 🤦♀️ Now that's is just insine!
100% He should be behind bars. He basically did to these 2 the same that was done upon him. He wanted justice for him and his attacker but wants to deny justice to these innocent he gunned down. Nope. Choices have consequences
@@therealtimc08 no he’s is the right person, he had the motive and desire to kill whoever he thought attacked him , he took the law into his own hands, he and he along is responsible for killing these people, so not he gets to face his crimes. There are a lot of people in prison who are innocent but he ain’t one of them ………
I see a lot of comments from people who haven't been following this case, and/or didn't watch the trials. This is an ugly miscarriage of justice both for the families of the men who died, the men who were injured, _and_ for Michael Keetley. Just having a warm body behind bars _isn't_ justice. There's plenty of things about how this case happened to complain about, but if you take away just one question, let it be: how did a text message accusing Keetley of shooting these men start circulating among the victims' social circles at a time when none of the eyewitnesses were able to identify him (including _not_ picking him from a photo lineup he was in; saying the shooter was someone they'd never seen before though they had seen/knew Keetley as the ice cream man who let them and their kids buy things on credit; described a shooter a hundred pounds heavier; etc.). Simplified: Who was accusing Michael Keetley of having shot their friends before any of those friends -- the only witnesses -- knew it was Michael Keetley who (allegedly) shot them?
Exactly and there were a lot of witness tampering the detective that investigated this case together with the detective that testified was found guilty of 100 cases of misconduct as was put on the record in this trial. And why was immunity given to people that was questioned like the employee that MK had the fight with and the machinenest neighbor that had to move away because of the criminal activities going on in that street. I would think that send a text blaming someone else to the friends is the oldest trick in the book to misdirect.
Well before the shooting he was going around the neighborhood asking where “creeper” could be found , asking who creeper is etc….& then the shooter asking for “creeper”…so they probably just assumed it was him…simple
Great judge, great prosecution team, and a good job to the defense as well. He fought for his client, with as little as he had to go with. Justice has been served.
Keetley was an easy fall guy with a motive everyone knew about simply because he asked for his own justice... and the real killers took advantage of that. The jury got this one wrong! It's a dangerous time to be going through the court system right now.
You done lost your mind. He murdered those man and tried his best to murder everyone on that porch. Yeah, it's a dangerous time for criminals to be in the court system because prosecution teams are on it and getting these murdering scum convicted....Keetley is guilty and deserves to be where he is. Life
MK caused his own demise. He murdered 2 brothers and attempted to assassinate their friends. MK is a smug remorseless coward who murdered 2 young men and attempted to murder four other men. MK deserves to rot in jail, he is menace to society.
Most people who watched this trial believe this guy was innocent. What a disgusting miscarriage of justice. In his previous trial, TEN JURORS VOTED NOT GUILTY.
How is the convicted suspect suppose to complete a life sentence in a environment where the criminals he was looking to eliminate may now be his cellmate?
12 years for Justice for the murder of 2 brothers over 12 USD$ and vigilante justice got the wrong perps. I'm sure the Ice cream man was tired of being robbed and for such small amounts, the cops didn't bother to investigate much of their time to find the perps so he took justice into his own hands v investing in cameras around his truck and got the evidence on video for the cops which is what I would have done.
It wasn't over the $12. It was over the 5 rounds they plugged him with that left him permanently crippled for the rest of his life. It's just dishonest to say it was about $12.
Good to see him in orange instead of a Mr. Rogers sweater. Even better that we’ll never have to look at his face again!! I hope he enjoys living with gang members now.
It’s too bad they took the death penalty off the table. I understand why they felt they had to but it’s still a shame that Keetley didn’t have to face the same sentence he meted out on those innocent people. I truly believe that if he had not been caught more people would have died once he realized he shot the wrong people.
Am I a bad person for cringing when witness statements get to preachy? People can say what they want but when it’s overkill on the God bs it irks me a bit.
I understand the defense is fighting for their client but… he has rights also. So to say that Keetley wants to address the court but he *MUST* remain silent because of appellate issues is just WRONG. Just like taking the stand, his attys can advise him but it is ultimately HIS decision whether to or not. To say he’s not allowed at speak goes against his rights. (Yes, I understand he’s taking his attys advise here… it’s just the way it was worded that got me.)
It’s baloney that the defense says he could not do it. My husband’s hand was shattered in a farming accident. It is held together by plates and pins. He is able to shoot every gun we have.
No way, he was convinced!? After a mistrial that was so abysmal prepared. Last time the witnesses couldn't identify him, said he wear something different and couldn't identify his car or the weapon he used. I didn't watched this trial, but the last mistrial was really terrible run by the prosecutor and the witnesses weren't creditable at all. Not because of their character, but because a) they already had a bias against him because of some rumors, and b) they couldn't identify anything correctly.
I've never seen a murder trial where the judge lets the victims family directly address the defendant during the victim impact statements. The judges usually have them address the court.
This is my favourite Judge he’s so clear in his instructions. The Defence attorney needs to, stop his ranting. He repeats repeats repeats , he’s not helping the defendant. Who is guilty and needs to be locked up for life .
I watched the entire trial and I couldn't stand the defense attorneys! They were obnoxious and arrogant but they lost and they can't stand it and want a do over...this was already a retrial and now they want a do over. The jury spoke....you can't keep trying until you get the results they want.
What makes me angry about defense is... How do we know what he could or could not do with his hand....he can act like he can't do things to perpetuate that his hand is still weak without it being true. There is No objective test to prove 100%...its all based on him performing per a MD request and that can be faked for medications, further gain disability coverage, to get out of doing things like work or being accountable for certain actions because oh but he's disabled... Nah he can fake severity
You’ve adopted the mindset that he had to prove himself innocent. That’s the main problem with the justice system right now. A prosecutor presses charges and a lot of people assume guilty. Some of these people end up on a jury.
![[UNCUT] "บอสณวัฒน์" แฉ! แหล่งซุกเงินแก๊งบอส ขยันผิดที่ไม่กี่ปีก็เข้าคุก l คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ l17ต.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BL56qIfXYZM/mqdefault.jpg)
![⭐ฮิตในTikTok!! ( มะมะมะหมูเด้ง MooDeng ) Ver. แดนซ์ ReMix BY [ ดีเจกิต รีมิกซ์ ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4noyAoMa7bQ/mqdefault.jpg)
To anyone who thinks what this guy did was justified: robbery is not a crime punishable by death. Even if it was, this guy isn't Judge and Jury, so he doesn't get to be the executioner. He was robbed of $12. Then he kills people who had nothing to do with the crime. How exactly does that justify what he did. He deserves life in prision. It's better than what he gave to two individuals. Even if someone robs you of $100,000 or a million, it still isn't a crime to be punished by death. And we don't have the right to choose who lives and dies. Maybe take a hard look at what you are saying and supporting.
he didnt kill anybody. this guy and scott peterson are wrongfully imprisoned!
@@bryced7633 🤣🤣
You have a point however I believe that if you catch someone in your Home trying to rob you or your home 🏡 than you have a right to arm & ptotect yourself in that circumstance. Some people willbtry to hurt or kill you for your $ or possessions. But that man he goes back to retaliate and shot the wrong people smh 🤦♀️ Now that's is just insine!
100% He should be behind bars. He basically did to these 2 the same that was done upon him. He wanted justice for him and his attacker but wants to deny justice to these innocent he gunned down. Nope. Choices have consequences
@@mm00777 I agree with you completely. If someone comes into my home, I will defend myself, my cats, and my possesions.
Heart wrenching to see a mother wait 12 years for justice. Her heart will always ache. I hope she finds some semblance of peace now.
Putting the wrong person in prison does nothing for the cause of justice.
Yeah lock up an innocent man......
@@therealtimc08 no he’s is the right person, he had the motive and desire to kill whoever he thought attacked him , he took the law into his own hands, he and he along is responsible for killing these people, so not he gets to face his crimes. There are a lot of people in prison who are innocent but he ain’t one of them ………
Well, how about the latinos that actually did do the crime. Where are their souls
I see a lot of comments from people who haven't been following this case, and/or didn't watch the trials. This is an ugly miscarriage of justice both for the families of the men who died, the men who were injured, _and_ for Michael Keetley. Just having a warm body behind bars _isn't_ justice.
There's plenty of things about how this case happened to complain about, but if you take away just one question, let it be: how did a text message accusing Keetley of shooting these men start circulating among the victims' social circles at a time when none of the eyewitnesses were able to identify him (including _not_ picking him from a photo lineup he was in; saying the shooter was someone they'd never seen before though they had seen/knew Keetley as the ice cream man who let them and their kids buy things on credit; described a shooter a hundred pounds heavier; etc.). Simplified: Who was accusing Michael Keetley of having shot their friends before any of those friends -- the only witnesses -- knew it was Michael Keetley who (allegedly) shot them?
Exactly and there were a lot of witness tampering the detective that investigated this case together with the detective that testified was found guilty of 100 cases of misconduct as was put on the record in this trial. And why was immunity given to people that was questioned like the employee that MK had the fight with and the machinenest neighbor that had to move away because of the criminal activities going on in that street. I would think that send a text blaming someone else to the friends is the oldest trick in the book to misdirect.
Well before the shooting he was going around the neighborhood asking where “creeper” could be found , asking who creeper is etc….& then the shooter asking for “creeper”…so they probably just assumed it was him…simple
How can none of you see that The ice cream man is the fall guy for a violent Gang Act.
I see it
How can you not see you are delusional?
Stop it Mark
@@AfterTheRains There's evidence he was home at the time of the murder.
That was my take after the 1st trial
Great judge, great prosecution team, and a good job to the defense as well. He fought for his client, with as little as he had to go with. Justice has been served.
I've been waiting for Years for judge Sabella's comment in this matter and the day has come
They should have played the ice cream song while they read his life sentence
I love this Judge. It’s hard to imagine having to wait so long for justice.
If defendants lawyer mentioned something untrue file lawsuit
Keetley was an easy fall guy with a motive everyone knew about simply because he asked for his own justice... and the real killers took advantage of that. The jury got this one wrong! It's a dangerous time to be going through the court system right now.
You done lost your mind. He murdered those man and tried his best to murder everyone on that porch. Yeah, it's a dangerous time for criminals to be in the court system because prosecution teams are on it and getting these murdering scum convicted....Keetley is guilty and deserves to be where he is. Life
@Misty , he wasn’t the fall guy, he is the guy so there’s that …………
David Beckwith, Wesley Smith and Lugo were all terrible, there was definitely reasonable doubt!
MK caused his own demise. He murdered 2 brothers and attempted to assassinate their friends. MK is a smug remorseless coward who murdered 2 young men and attempted to murder four other men. MK deserves to rot in jail, he is menace to society.
Very unpopular opinion that I agree with!
I still believe this guy is innocent
And you still would be wrong. He is guilty
Most people who watched this trial believe this guy was innocent.
What a disgusting miscarriage of justice.
In his previous trial, TEN JURORS VOTED NOT GUILTY.
Is creeper there for sentencing.we’re is creeper
got that smirk whip right off his face
He's innocent.
What a miscarriage of justice.
You obviously didn't watch the whole trial. He is guilty...He is right where he belongs....Life
@@jathanportis8432 You're delusional.
Did you know in the previous trial TEN jurors voted not guilty?
How is the convicted suspect suppose to complete a life sentence in a environment where the criminals he was looking to eliminate may now be his cellmate?
12 years for Justice for the murder of 2 brothers over 12 USD$ and vigilante justice got the wrong perps. I'm sure the Ice cream man was tired of being robbed and for such small amounts, the cops didn't bother to investigate much of their time to find the perps so he took justice into his own hands v investing in cameras around his truck and got the evidence on video for the cops which is what I would have done.
It wasn't over the $12. It was over the 5 rounds they plugged him with that left him permanently crippled for the rest of his life. It's just dishonest to say it was about $12.
Wow! People got tempers. Need to control their anger.
Sometimes you should consider ‘walk a mile in my shoes’ before criticising.
Dude..stop walking away from mic...when you're speaking...your motion denied
justice for the 2 families.. thank you to the jury who did the right thing!
innocent man got locked up.... smh
The woman giving the impact statement lost her two sons .that was all she had.there was only one family that lost love ones.
Good to see him in orange instead of a Mr. Rogers sweater. Even better that we’ll never have to look at his face again!! I hope he enjoys living with gang members now.
JUSTICE WAS SERVED!
The evidence was overwhelming....Overwhelming. the Jury got it 100% right
He did it. He knows he did it. A third trial? No way! I feel for the mother who lost TWO sons.
Begins at 10:55
got a glimpse of him at the time of crime, that guy did the shooting
It’s too bad they took the death penalty off the table. I understand why they felt they had to but it’s still a shame that Keetley didn’t have to face the same sentence he meted out on those innocent people. I truly believe that if he had not been caught more people would have died once he realized he shot the wrong people.
Me personally I don't agree with death penalty under any circumstances so I think this sentence is ok.
He has some great lawyers,
My heart aches for their mama.
No live chat?
Live chat ended. He's been sentenced. It's all over now
Am I a bad person for cringing when witness statements get to preachy? People can say what they want but when it’s overkill on the God bs it irks me a bit.
Is there no sound?
once the judge starts talking sound comes on :)
I understand the defense is fighting for their client but… he has rights also. So to say that Keetley wants to address the court but he *MUST* remain silent because of appellate issues is just WRONG. Just like taking the stand, his attys can advise him but it is ultimately HIS decision whether to or not. To say he’s not allowed at speak goes against his rights. (Yes, I understand he’s taking his attys advise here… it’s just the way it was worded that got me.)
It’s baloney that the defense says he could not do it. My husband’s hand was shattered in a farming accident. It is held together by plates and pins. He is able to shoot every gun we have.
The most bored defendant ever.
Fk now I’m getting commercials 🤦♀️
Is this in Meheco?
No, the legal system works better in Meheco.
No sound....
Many ways to view this one. It's hard for me to look past the fact that --- They drew first blood.
He had the wrong people.
The men MK gunned down had nothing to do with what happened to him in Jan 2010.
LIVE ended yall. This is the recap. I won't spoil it for those that want to know what happened.
No way, he was convinced!? After a mistrial that was so abysmal prepared. Last time the witnesses couldn't identify him, said he wear something different and couldn't identify his car or the weapon he used. I didn't watched this trial, but the last mistrial was really terrible run by the prosecutor and the witnesses weren't creditable at all. Not because of their character, but because a) they already had a bias against him because of some rumors, and b) they couldn't identify anything correctly.
The poor mother’s heart is broken but will never get answers to her questions since he would have to admit his guilt in order to reply.
I've never seen a murder trial where the judge lets the victims family directly address the defendant during the victim impact statements. The judges usually have them address the court.
Yes, just last week, victim impact statements were not allowed to be directed at Zachariah Anderson, judge warned the family of the victim!
@@Shashie24 I was more shocked when the judge asked the defense if they had any questions for the victims family members.
It's at the courts' discretion....Victims can absolutely talk directly to defendants if the court allows it
Maybe watch the Nicholas Cruz Trial......... This is FLOrIDA
Yes that happens a lot
Don't Drop The Soap! Gonna be rough in there for a ice cream seller. The brothers will not be pleased.
Did he ever said which ice cream flavor was the best seller ?
Maybe his defense table should stop checking her split ends and worry about her client! I am sure she is a nice person but a mans life is at stake!
@@kate1830 it was in the beginning when his attorney started to speak, not sure on the time.
This is my favourite Judge he’s so clear in his instructions. The Defence attorney needs to, stop his ranting. He repeats repeats repeats , he’s not helping the defendant. Who is guilty and needs to be locked up for life .
I watched the entire trial and I couldn't stand the defense attorneys! They were obnoxious and arrogant but they lost and they can't stand it and want a do over...this was already a retrial and now they want a do over. The jury spoke....you can't keep trying until you get the results they want.
And there he sits, chatting up to the woman. Creep-a-zoid!
What makes me angry about defense is... How do we know what he could or could not do with his hand....he can act like he can't do things to perpetuate that his hand is still weak without it being true. There is No objective test to prove 100%...its all based on him performing per a MD request and that can be faked for medications, further gain disability coverage, to get out of doing things like work or being accountable for certain actions because oh but he's disabled... Nah he can fake severity
I believe medical experts testified on his ability to use his hand was limited
You can look at the physiology of his hand and know whether it will function.
@@FirstLast-il6ok I am not an orthopedic hand surgeon so no way of knowing or being able to judge.
You’ve adopted the mindset that he had to prove himself innocent. That’s the main problem with the justice system right now. A prosecutor presses charges and a lot of people assume guilty. Some of these people end up on a jury.
I have a feeling he will have a miraculous recovery immediately after his failed appeal.
No disability payments in prison.
If you look at his neck, it's like a big love heart below the chin
I hate offices texting 💬 in court esp the blond
The defendant doesn't fit in a 3rd world region of the country. He deserves to be somewhere civilized.
Good morning.
Lol anyone who thinks the jury got it right didn’t watch the trial period
how many trials does this guy get wasting more tax money
Woww what an awesome young man (the last speaker)
God Bless Daniel Beltran 🙏🏻
He's a better person than I am. I wouldn't be so forgiving.