You should do this test again, cylance was in its infancy when this was first done and has changed a lot since then. You should see if it takes care of these threats now and see if you like the new interface
Thats quite a good test, I kinda found your channel because I saw a Kaspersky test, I was talking to somebody about what AV was a good option for them, and I mentioned that I really liked Kaspersky back in the days that I used it, they are much more expensive then other cheap AV, but I knew they were semi good...and I'm glad that even after all those years of not having used an AV my old experience still holds true, I'll definitely recommend that video for them as to why they shouldn't cheap out on an AV if they are going to pay for it. also 13:54 (nervously laughs in gigabit internet) yeah it's really nice, but the scary part of having it is if you ever need to move that is not a fun idea. or just use non gigabit internet for your "regular stuff" that you do... "oh there we go it's not respon... oh wait no you're not on gigabit fiber :)" The worst part is not just the speed, I mean you can do a lot with a petty 200-300mbps, but the ping can really make it look so much worst then it is. there's a big difference between 100mbps cable vs 100mbps fiber. You get the same feeling when you use a super slow computer: hold on I clicked on that icon 0.1µs ago, is your $100 machine broken or heavily infected? what's that? HDD? no never heard of that Software, neither have I heard about company "dude it's a dual core CPU just wait" ;) And that was my superiority complex rant :D
Cylance does have an advanced UI you can enabled by using command prompt. I can log in and view every file that has been blocked. I thankful for your review and this does help me out.
Great demonstration of pragmatism to testing. Very interesting as you went and clicked on pages and software trying to install. Kudos, keep it up! Cheers.
Good video. One thing to keep in mind is that the Cylance agent installed as you have will have a default config. After your install, your machine name would show up in a portal where you can have policies applied to you. There are a bunch of memory and other lockdown settings which would have completely stopped 99.999% of what you have tested. Try another test if you can with a full lockdown of the highest security settings.
Hey leo...love ur video....btw u haven't made any video about 2019 avira, McAfee,k7 ...still waiting for ur review on those products...also make a separate video about new banking Trickbot trojan which disable windows 10 defender....also keep making video we love u and ur channel...pls keep us updated.. thank you
Someone posted that Cylance was currently running a special and that this was a good AV. I googled reviews on it. I then came to a reddit thread saying sad Cylance. So I went to the TH-cam link posted. It sent me to this video. This video is very well done and I have since watched others you have done. I subscribed because of this. Keep up the good work.
What AV recommends based on your experiences? With CyYlance it would be necessary to see what type of configuration the console had, or were you in the most restrictive? Regards.
I administer Cylance PROTECT at my company and while this is a great video, it is only showing the product from the end-user perspective with very limited information. There is a whole other side with an admin control panel that you can sign into to view more detailed threat information. Cylance also allows you to configure device protection policies which includes options for enabling file actions, memory protection, application control, script control, device control, etc - and we don't know how any of that is configured in this experiment. Basically there are a number of sections with a range of options, so depending on how the policy is configured on the back end will greatly affect how effective Cylance is at catching and responding to the various threat types.
The simplicity is designed to keep clients from screwing with it. But here is how you get better UI. If you need to do advanced troubleshooting or run a scan on a system 1. Disable/Exit the Agent UI Windows: Right-click the Agent icon (system tray), then select Exit. 2. Open the command prompt, then do the following: Windows: Enter: "C:\Program Files\Cylance\Desktop\CylanceUI.exe" -a
I must say that in the 3 years that we've been using Cylance, not a single one of our clients has had any viruses slip past it. I will be sending this video to our Cylance rep though.
Great test. I would however like to se what settings is turned on. And you are missing some tabs in our UI. What version are you running? Oh, btw. Cylance does everything localy, no cloud compunting. The AV can run in 100% offline mode.
@@AndrewPeacockUK No, But I have been using Cylance for a few years. Allways wanted to put it to the test and would like to compare the settings used in the video to my own :D
As a Cylance Admin user at work, I also do not like a lot about the product. In it's defense though, you would have to look at the online console to see what has been turned on. the product (at least our version at work) is highly customizable and does not have all of the features turned on as default. For instance, Memory blocking/alerting and Script blocking/alerting have to be turned on. Also, your version might not be the most current as they release updates almost monthly and auto update is also not defaulted.
I'm shocked I recommended this about a month ago and here it is lol, this was honestly just in the news (security related news) apparently the software looks for certain stings and if it find them it auto whitelists the software. Some researchers where able to find a string used from a video game (which caused it to be auto white listed and edited the same code into a few types of malware and sure enough Cylance white listed the malware lol. For context, all the malware samples that where whitelisted by Cylance where flagged as malware before the addition of the string used to whitelist a video games anti-cheat.
We've use this at my organization, and honestly I've seen WAY WAY WAY WAY more false flags, lots of blocking normal every day stuff that shouldn't have any heuristics of a virus. Honestly in practice I feel like every other AV was more effective.
It's probably not the greatest AV out there, but I personally use it because it is very lightweight (lighter than Windows Defender it seems) which honestly helps quite a bit on my laptop with only 8gb of RAM
Hi there Leo, would it be possible to do a test with the same methodology (including the GG AI false positive) for purely the behavioural components of other more "traditional" AVs? For example to retest Kaspersky's System Watcher (with System Watcher being the only active component and Kaspersky Security Network being disabled). Or Bitdefender's Active Threat Control (with the cloud and everything else being disabled). Or your (probable) favourite - Emsisoft's Behaviour Blocker (without cloud lookup). Or even Comodo's VirusScope if you're feeling fancy... :p This could turn into a cool miniseries, don't you think?
He already did a specific test of System Watcher a while ago: th-cam.com/video/wUPHr6zp8-k/w-d-xo.html. Further back, he also did some other behaviour blocker tests (you can search for them).
these AI based AV solutions have so much to learn, also why havent they utilized existing white/black lists or allow them to be updated by current AV definitions and allow the AI to bolster that, and if they do do this then they have implemented it incorrectly. Seems that a lot of things made these days are either not built to last or made by someone who thinks they have completed their work but still have a ways to go
Your test may be quick n easy, but it does not simulate real world use of anti-malware. A Proper AV test: Step 1 - Install all windows updated, reboot Step 2 - Install AV, reboot Step 3 - If initial scan is occurring (which Cylance does), let it finish initial scan Step 4 - NOW try your malware test Anyone who installs ANY anti-malware program and immediately starts surfing/downloading/installing is asking for it, especially without a reboot allowing the service to start in its normal operation mode.
good test. remember that with cylance, being AI, it is looking for triggers, so some of those failures to detect will later be picked up as those processes/exes try something it deems unusual. it might have been interesting to leave your system running for a day to see if they are picked up.
please try to test that as a home option towards malware and security as an option for laptops that need protection from virus, trojans, malware. if windows could do this on the Enterprise level it would solve HiD attacks as well!
How much protection does running the system in a user account give? Does any serious amount of malware escalate itself to admin privileges without needing your admin password to install? I know you don’t think much of whitelisting, but I like the idea of being warned when something is trying to install itself when I never intended to install something, that would at least block malware from malicious links in emails or clicking in malicious ads on websites?
Hi Leo, These cloud base AV's don't convince me this reminds me of Webroot or Panda. They're light but not as effective AV products Kasperksy, Bitdefender or Avast/ Avg which have a better behavior component.
I was using it for more than a year. It worked fine, but I was forced to stop using it because of lack of customization. It is no not possible to turn it off temporarily in any way and it is not possible to set any ignore directory. For example I have an old Delphi project, I need to use old Delphi IDE, every exe file compiled by this IDE is suspicious for Cylance and denies to start it. It seems Cylance is designed to be managed remotelly by IT department where all employees must follow strict rules. There are very few options how to customize it by end user.
One thing that I noticed about your test was that Cylance was still scanning when you started running the SOS. I've used Cylance and have found that it sometimes takes some time to identify and quarantine files that it doesn't recognize. I'd like to see the test run again but next time giving Cylance some time to scan all of the files before coming to the conclusion that it "missed some stuff". Thanks!
@@pcsecuritychannel I agree with you. AV should kill it - not just allow it to run then remove it later. For that matter, I genuinely don't care if malware resides in a temp folder or elsewhere are long as it never goes active!! :-)
Leo, could you tell me how likely it is, that Process Hacker installed could be utilised by a virus or so to get access to my system? I love that tool, but Sophos Pro also blocks it and I created an exception to have it on my system. That said, Sophos Pro didn't block any other system tool ever since I use Sophos. So, overall I think Sophos does a very good job in determine where it should interrupt.
I was considering it because my cable company is willing to give me paid norton for free for now I’m using a free av would it be worth it to switch to paid
@@musicalplankton I don't know about bit defender because I personally use Kaspersky. With Kaspersky you can just reset the trial each month or just buy a 1 year license for like 15 dollars or less. If you wanna stick to bitdefender you should watch tpsc series where he reviews a combination of free AVs together.
We run Palo Alto Traps! Reach out to me I could give you an install for you to test this against your lab files be interested to see how it performs. Let me know Darren
Concerning Malwarebytes, I think you can tell it NOT to identify your fav programs as malware! I think i saw this in their programs instructions or settings?
The product is installed but you don't know if it's fully functional plus Cylance doesn't work on cloud and you could even disconnect your network adapter on your test machine.
I find it good, that you test a lot of antivirus software! Because you should choose wich antivirus is good enough for yourself and you help for that! But we must ever think of that, that every scanner has his disadvantages!
what would you say was the lightest antimalware product you have tested on the cpu? (on a side note how do i stop system interrupts from hogging the cpu, ive tried updating the drivers and disabling recommended things like wake on magic packet)
if privacy and security is an issue i think windows should impliment this into the kernel and os which will then further protect enterprise netverks...lol the netverks will be safer and furthermore on their server oses as well! and i've witness hacked routers also where options has been hidden in the webbased setup!
My problem with this, is you need to reiterate this is for the home version. this is not Cylance Protect, this is SMART and a lot of people will not know the diff. The commercial product of Cylance PROTECT is way more robust and has a few modules unavailable to the general public. The reason these are unavailable is that average users could not make sense. for once I would like to not have these videos sent to me by coworkers going "SEE!!" Please do this test with the commercial version, with all modules in block/terminate. You can request a demo, that will get you in touch with a Master MSSP, who can teach you how to use it, or may be willing to do some tests with you! As far as production quality 9/10 brother!
he won't test it because this video was paid by Cylance competition, Crowdstrike. He has disabled lot of stuff in the online console and so missed lot of things. Notice the windows update was purposely planned during "lab" testing.
You should have used Cylance Protect and Optics software and put your device in proper protection policy where you have memory protection and script blocking. Then Cylance would block 99.9% of what you just throw at him. Cylance Protect is much better than just this Antyvirus version.
I genuinely appreciate your effort. You deserve your place in the "malware & security" community.
@@Dishings I did not know it at the time.
"You're getting outdone by Norton"
I lost my shit 🤣
You should do this test again, cylance was in its infancy when this was first done and has changed a lot since then. You should see if it takes care of these threats now and see if you like the new interface
Amazing! It was only yesterday or the day before that I searched your channel for a Cylance test. Thanks for doing this!
Thank you for this test so much. I was about to buy it and test it for myself, the software is much more expensive than a regular AV.
Cylance Protect is cheaper from what I can tell than Norton, the Business version is on par with Norton.
Thanks for this test, was looking forward to it! ^^
Thats quite a good test, I kinda found your channel because I saw a Kaspersky test, I was talking to somebody about what AV was a good option for them, and I mentioned that I really liked Kaspersky back in the days that I used it, they are much more expensive then other cheap AV, but I knew they were semi good...and I'm glad that even after all those years of not having used an AV my old experience still holds true, I'll definitely recommend that video for them as to why they shouldn't cheap out on an AV if they are going to pay for it.
also 13:54
(nervously laughs in gigabit internet) yeah it's really nice, but the scary part of having it is if you ever need to move that is not a fun idea.
or just use non gigabit internet for your "regular stuff" that you do... "oh there we go it's not respon... oh wait no you're not on gigabit fiber :)"
The worst part is not just the speed, I mean you can do a lot with a petty 200-300mbps, but the ping can really make it look so much worst then it is.
there's a big difference between 100mbps cable vs 100mbps fiber.
You get the same feeling when you use a super slow computer:
hold on I clicked on that icon 0.1µs ago, is your $100 machine broken or heavily infected?
what's that? HDD? no never heard of that Software, neither have I heard about company "dude it's a dual core CPU just wait" ;)
And that was my superiority complex rant :D
Cylance does have an advanced UI you can enabled by using command prompt. I can log in and view every file that has been blocked. I thankful for your review and this does help me out.
And just how is this done? The Internet based UI for managing the product is very lacking, IMO. Thank you.
It missed the worst virus of all: The dreaded "Windows Update" virus!
Absolutely!
System32 virus takes up 32gb, and will keep compounding every day
STOP TRYING TO GET PEOPLE TO DELETE SYSTEM32, DUDE!
@@GroupNebula563 no no no! YOU stop trying to help scammers system32 is a notorious virus that affects your windows greatly you are terrible!
@@asfcntersfefsrsgrvtgvsrtgs7769 And that's why I use MS-DOS!
Great demonstration of pragmatism to testing. Very interesting as you went and clicked on pages and software trying to install. Kudos, keep it up! Cheers.
Good video. One thing to keep in mind is that the Cylance agent installed as you have will have a default config. After your install, your machine name would show up in a portal where you can have policies applied to you. There are a bunch of memory and other lockdown settings which would have completely stopped 99.999% of what you have tested. Try another test if you can with a full lockdown of the highest security settings.
Hey leo...love ur video....btw u haven't made any video about 2019 avira, McAfee,k7 ...still waiting for ur review on those products...also make a separate video about new banking Trickbot trojan which disable windows 10 defender....also keep making video we love u and ur channel...pls keep us updated.. thank you
Hi! I haven't watched any of your videos recently due to my GCSEs, but you sound a whole lot different! Keep up the good work :)
^First Comment
@@Gamerad360 ?
Good luck with your GCSEs ;)
@@pcsecuritychannel Thanks! :)
Someone posted that Cylance was currently running a special and that this was a good AV. I googled reviews on it. I then came to a reddit thread saying sad Cylance. So I went to the TH-cam link posted. It sent me to this video. This video is very well done and I have since watched others you have done. I subscribed because of this. Keep up the good work.
What AV recommends based on your experiences?
With CyYlance it would be necessary to see what type of configuration the console had, or were you in the most restrictive?
Regards.
Could you make a video with your recommendations for the best antimalware programs to run together for the best protection?
I administer Cylance PROTECT at my company and while this is a great video, it is only showing the product from the end-user perspective with very limited information. There is a whole other side with an admin control panel that you can sign into to view more detailed threat information. Cylance also allows you to configure device protection policies which includes options for enabling file actions, memory protection, application control, script control, device control, etc - and we don't know how any of that is configured in this experiment. Basically there are a number of sections with a range of options, so depending on how the policy is configured on the back end will greatly affect how effective Cylance is at catching and responding to the various threat types.
You seem to confuse the home version with the Endpoint version
when norton detect something that you miss and is not false positive, you know you are in big problem.
LOL
xD
*A couple pages trying to load*
Not even concerned that it’s an ip logger
He probably has a vpn on though
( 4:14 )
I thought the same lol
Meh, I'm moving soon anyway. :P
But yes, I use VPN.
The PC Security Channel [TPSC] what vpn do you use
@@pcsecuritychannel
What are iploggers used for?
@@wooshbait36
I'm so sorry to have offended you, stranger. Iplogging... Hmm maybe logging IPs? But... why would you want that?
The simplicity is designed to keep clients from screwing with it. But here is how you get better UI.
If you need to do advanced troubleshooting or run a scan on a system
1. Disable/Exit the Agent UI
Windows: Right-click the Agent icon (system tray), then select Exit.
2. Open the command prompt, then do the following:
Windows:
Enter: "C:\Program Files\Cylance\Desktop\CylanceUI.exe" -a
I must say that in the 3 years that we've been using Cylance, not a single one of our clients has had any viruses slip past it. I will be sending this video to our Cylance rep though.
Best video ever. Subscribed!
Great test. I would however like to se what settings is turned on. And you are missing some tabs in our UI. What version are you running?
Oh, btw. Cylance does everything localy, no cloud compunting. The AV can run in 100% offline mode.
I was running version 2.0.1533.2 with policy set to default (online).
Do you work for Cylance?
@@AndrewPeacockUK No, But I have been using Cylance for a few years. Allways wanted to put it to the test and would like to compare the settings used in the video to my own :D
Im missing two important tabs in the UI (Exploits and Scripts), therefor im wondering if everything is turned on.
@@bellator86 Ah, awesome!
Great video.
Agreed
As a Cylance Admin user at work, I also do not like a lot about the product. In it's defense though, you would have to look at the online console to see what has been turned on. the product (at least our version at work) is highly customizable and does not have all of the features turned on as default. For instance, Memory blocking/alerting and Script blocking/alerting have to be turned on. Also, your version might not be the most current as they release updates almost monthly and auto update is also not defaulted.
How do you think it could be improved?
I'm shocked I recommended this about a month ago and here it is lol, this was honestly just in the news (security related news) apparently the software looks for certain stings and if it find them it auto whitelists the software. Some researchers where able to find a string used from a video game (which caused it to be auto white listed and edited the same code into a few types of malware and sure enough Cylance white listed the malware lol.
For context, all the malware samples that where whitelisted by Cylance where flagged as malware before the addition of the string used to whitelist a video games anti-cheat.
We've use this at my organization, and honestly I've seen WAY WAY WAY WAY more false flags, lots of blocking normal every day stuff that shouldn't have any heuristics of a virus. Honestly in practice I feel like every other AV was more effective.
It's probably not the greatest AV out there, but I personally use it because it is very lightweight (lighter than Windows Defender it seems) which honestly helps quite a bit on my laptop with only 8gb of RAM
Its dogshit try out something like kaspersky.
Hi there Leo,
would it be possible to do a test with the same methodology (including the GG AI false positive) for purely the behavioural components of other more "traditional" AVs?
For example to retest Kaspersky's System Watcher (with System Watcher being the only active component and Kaspersky Security Network being disabled).
Or Bitdefender's Active Threat Control (with the cloud and everything else being disabled).
Or your (probable) favourite - Emsisoft's Behaviour Blocker (without cloud lookup).
Or even Comodo's VirusScope if you're feeling fancy... :p
This could turn into a cool miniseries, don't you think?
Great idea!
He already did a specific test of System Watcher a while ago: th-cam.com/video/wUPHr6zp8-k/w-d-xo.html. Further back, he also did some other behaviour blocker tests (you can search for them).
He won't ever test emsisoft again on video because he works there now. He may show off the features as he has does before, but never do a proper test.
@@Danmanair I thought so myself ;-p
@@Hecklezz Yeah, sure. There are enough other Behaviour Blockers out there to test. :)
Great reviews!
Hey buddy, where can I find the wallpaper? Greets
Love your vids man thank you
these AI based AV solutions have so much to learn, also why havent they utilized existing white/black lists or allow them to be updated by current AV definitions and allow the AI to bolster that, and if they do do this then they have implemented it incorrectly. Seems that a lot of things made these days are either not built to last or made by someone who thinks they have completed their work but still have a ways to go
Your test may be quick n easy, but it does not simulate real world use of anti-malware.
A Proper AV test:
Step 1 - Install all windows updated, reboot
Step 2 - Install AV, reboot
Step 3 - If initial scan is occurring (which Cylance does), let it finish initial scan
Step 4 - NOW try your malware test
Anyone who installs ANY anti-malware program and immediately starts surfing/downloading/installing is asking for it, especially without a reboot allowing the service to start in its normal operation mode.
I love longer videos, make more of them
Have you done this with Emsisoft 2019 ?
good test. remember that with cylance, being AI, it is looking for triggers, so some of those failures to detect will later be picked up as those processes/exes try something it deems unusual. it might have been interesting to leave your system running for a day to see if they are picked up.
Make an updated review please. They seem to be the first to do an ad campaign targeting Kaspersky customers
Great videos!
i like this kinda content imma subscrib
please try to test that as a home option towards malware and security as an option for laptops that need protection from virus, trojans, malware. if windows could do this on the Enterprise level it would solve HiD attacks as well!
Any updated tests for cylance?
If you want to reboot Windows and not install updates, you could use shutdown -r -f -t 0 command.
Hitman Pro is i belive best malware killer from all of them
please can u try new eset internet security?
There is eset internet security 13?
Hey Leo, I've noticed there is now a "For Home" version. Do you think to test it as well?
Can you do this experiment using Cylance Protect? You will see the difference if you do the test with Protect.
Thank you very much sir
would still love to see this test run on ZoneAlarm Free Antivirus and Firewall non next gen
Really nice test! Trend micro test please 🙃🙃 have a nice day
Trend micro is good i used that :)
@@justrandomguy8002 yeah!
Cylance does use signatures and behavior blocking this not only AI.
How much protection does running the system in a user account give? Does any serious amount of malware escalate itself to admin privileges without needing your admin password to install?
I know you don’t think much of whitelisting, but I like the idea of being warned when something is trying to install itself when I never intended to install something, that would at least block malware from malicious links in emails or clicking in malicious ads on websites?
Can you please do a new review for Avast Antivirus?
lol
thank you so much
Hi Leo, These cloud base AV's don't convince me this reminds me of Webroot or Panda. They're light but not as effective AV products Kasperksy, Bitdefender or Avast/ Avg which have a better behavior component.
On the Mac would the out come be the same??
Prob since there are virus for macs depends on the user itself tho
TYVM Leo ;-)
Thanks a lot ! I like your test. A lot of people said to me that cylance is a brand-new AV.... IN FACT NOT AT ALL :-))
I wanted to see the Malwarebytes results man
I was using it for more than a year. It worked fine, but I was forced to stop using it because of lack of customization. It is no not possible to turn it off temporarily in any way and it is not possible to set any ignore directory. For example I have an old Delphi project, I need to use old Delphi IDE, every exe file compiled by this IDE is suspicious for Cylance and denies to start it.
It seems Cylance is designed to be managed remotelly by IT department where all employees must follow strict rules. There are very few options how to customize it by end user.
i thankx for the test i appreciate so.. would u test cylance protect endpoint for us?
Maybe, send me an email.
This is the best free software Ive seen. Respect.
One thing that I noticed about your test was that Cylance was still scanning when you started running the SOS. I've used Cylance and have found that it sometimes takes some time to identify and quarantine files that it doesn't recognize. I'd like to see the test run again but next time giving Cylance some time to scan all of the files before coming to the conclusion that it "missed some stuff". Thanks!
This is a proactive test, so it tests for prevention, not removal, after the fact. I do it the same way for other products too.
@@pcsecuritychannel I agree with you. AV should kill it - not just allow it to run then remove it later. For that matter, I genuinely don't care if malware resides in a temp folder or elsewhere are long as it never goes active!! :-)
Can you test Cisco's AMP for Enpoint as it claim to do also NG-AV but with aditional SHA based file detection? Thanks for the good stuff.
Just simply put the code, it works! thanks!
i have the same host config.
Would you tell me why you'd go for a laptop and not a desktop though?
Leo, could you tell me how likely it is, that Process Hacker installed could be utilised by a virus or so to get access to my system? I love that tool, but Sophos Pro also blocks it and I created an exception to have it on my system. That said, Sophos Pro didn't block any other system tool ever since I use Sophos. So, overall I think Sophos does a very good job in determine where it should interrupt.
For your SOS is there a reason you don't have MB suggested on your website?
So I heard you say that norton out did this av do you think you could do another review of norton I’m wondering about a switch
It's really not *that* important what you use. If you're using a good av already then there's no real reason for switching.
I was considering it because my cable company is willing to give me paid norton for free for now I’m using a free av would it be worth it to switch to paid
@@musicalplankton
What do you use
As of now I’m using bit defender free
@@musicalplankton
I don't know about bit defender because I personally use Kaspersky. With Kaspersky you can just reset the trial each month or just buy a 1 year license for like 15 dollars or less. If you wanna stick to bitdefender you should watch tpsc series where he reviews a combination of free AVs together.
What would be your opinion on Vivaldi web browser and also what you be your preferred browser extensions?
(9:26) Pause and look at the background kinda looks like gru off minions.
You running on a laptop or something? That fan noise bro! If you need me to build you a completely silent PC lemme know :)
Is the a video series like this for Linux based anti virus?
We run Palo Alto Traps! Reach out to me I could give you an install for you to test this against your lab files be interested to see how it performs.
Let me know
Darren
Please do whatever you can to get my computer safe and running good again
lol
Concerning Malwarebytes, I think you can tell it NOT to identify your fav programs as malware! I think i saw this in their programs instructions or settings?
Where can i support you
care to test Carbon Black which is now owned by VMware ?
The product is installed but you don't know if it's fully functional plus Cylance doesn't work on cloud and you could even disconnect your network adapter on your test machine.
I find it good, that you test a lot of antivirus software! Because you should choose wich antivirus is good enough for yourself and you help for that! But we must ever think of that, that every scanner has his disadvantages!
On the false positive test, you should have disabled the MBAM trial real-time protection but the nasties cylance let through makes me nervous.
So, what AV you recommend?
can you test trend micro antivirus
Getting outdone by Norton!! ROFL ... I almost felt the burn
what would you say was the lightest antimalware product you have tested on the cpu? (on a side note how do i stop system interrupts from hogging the cpu, ive tried updating the drivers and disabling recommended things like wake on magic packet)
is there nay issues when you run 3 AV at once, wouldent they counter eachother by any chance? (malwarebytes, hitman pro, norton?)
As a person who grew up with pc technicians
I understand your
Language.
our school gives this to us for free so I wanted to check it out
Cylance looks only at PE files to stem the attack, not tasks/registry settings or anything post attack.
It looks like you have been given an MSP version, which is why there is no configuration and it seems very simple.
no that is the normal version msp version is better
if privacy and security is an issue i think windows should impliment this into the kernel and os which will then further protect enterprise netverks...lol the netverks will be safer and furthermore on their server oses as well! and i've witness hacked routers also where options has been hidden in the webbased setup!
Please test Trend Micro next?
I hate Trend Micro. I would love to see a proper test on it though aswell.
Now in 2021, Blackberry Cylance is a mile better than most antivirus in the market. Its less expensive too.
Try a retest in 2021
My problem with this, is you need to reiterate this is for the home version. this is not Cylance Protect, this is SMART and a lot of people will not know the diff. The commercial product of Cylance PROTECT is way more robust and has a few modules unavailable to the general public. The reason these are unavailable is that average users could not make sense. for once I would like to not have these videos sent to me by coworkers going "SEE!!"
Please do this test with the commercial version, with all modules in block/terminate. You can request a demo, that will get you in touch with a Master MSSP, who can teach you how to use it, or may be willing to do some tests with you!
As far as production quality 9/10 brother!
he won't test it because this video was paid by Cylance competition, Crowdstrike. He has disabled lot of stuff in the online console and so missed lot of things. Notice the windows update was purposely planned during "lab" testing.
You need to have access to the console to configure the antivirus.
What is the best enterprise application in this field?
How does Cylance compare to Kaspersky Total Security?
P.S. Don't MULTIPLE ant-virus programs at the same time - CONFLICT?
fun fact: Kaspersky also classifies ProcessHacker as risktool, because as they said "Process Hacker could be potentially misused by criminals."
Regedit is riskware because it could be misused
Many AVs do this with security tools. That’s not new or unique.
You should have used Cylance Protect and Optics software and put your device in proper protection policy where you have memory protection and script blocking. Then Cylance would block 99.9% of what you just throw at him. Cylance Protect is much better than just this Antyvirus version.
Blackberry needs to make their antivirus durable, competent, not to mention shatter-proof and not just their phones.
Mario583 Rome wasn't built overnight.