I love your channel so much. It's easy to notice in my humble opinion just how how much you're both enjoying the martial arts, sharing some of it with the world and having a good positive laugh while at it. I actually started watching your korean videos without understanding a word, but it's just a pleasure to watch. Thanks for going through the additional effort of re-uploading with English subtitles for us!
I only learned of Daitoryu thanks to one of your previous videos, and now I'm really starting to like it and respect it. Also: Kim is a grappling natural! Wow! :D
In the west, Aikido and other techniques which do not physically manhandle/disable the opponent are often widely mocked for being unrealistic and ineffective. Here, however, with someone actually explaining why, who can show when it fails and when it succeeds, and showing the subtleties, I can believe that these techniques work, especially in the context of swordsmanship. Psychology, extreme subtle differences in positioning and balance, etc. They appear to be subtle techniques meant for people who've already mastered all the more basic techniques and want a leg up on their opponent next time they find themselves in such a scenario. Edit: I have been informed that Aiki-jujitsu is not exactly Aikido, so not sure if anything I said really applies anymore! Sorry! Just as if not more important is probably the skill of the relevant practitioners and whether or not they've been taught in an effective way. It looks reasonable here, for example.
The biggest teaching of Aikido that also came from Aiki jujutsu is that you always have Atemi (striking) to make it work. There simply won't be any kuzushi if you are free fighting against a skilled opponent without Atemi. Unarmed scenario, hit them in the face to the point they cannot resist your techniques anymore, then use your Aikido throws. Sword scenario, without knowing how to cut, thrust, engage, create pressure from your sword blows, none of the techniques showed here will manifest
The difference between good Aikido vs good Aiki-Jujitsu is the same as good Judo vs good Jujitsu. Maybe there’s a difference in todays practice, but the creators of the systems had the same root.
if you mean the "period" at 3:05, what it really means is that "the foot is just to make sure." a "finishing touch" if you will, as in it's not really necessary for it to work but just to make sure.
Sometime if possible can you try out Dacian Falx and sica. They were the bain of the Romans at one time and would love to see folks with your skill see how you would use them.
So, basically, instead of getting into a bind with the opponent's sword, you're using the same portion of the blade to bind against their neck. Interesting. 👍
You are allowed to strike your opponent in the moment after they have fallen. However unless you are in a police taikai you will likely receive hansoku for any of these techniques.
Listen, you guys are pretty okay! I really mean just okay. Not trying to troll you guys at all so please do not take any offence to what I am trying to express. Please read "The Book of 5 Rings". It is from your homeland but none of you display any of the techniques therein. You have to be able to wield a sword with one hand or both hands. Being varied in techniques with one or two hands on the handle the sword throughout different transitions of the fight is of great importance. Being able to handle your blade properly in both ways will allow you more balance on uneven ground, counter troughs and sweeps by being able to use the complementary (not Weak) hand to prevent losing the advantage in the sword grappling stages. Both hands on the sword causes a lock-up condition making it easier for the the attacker to take you down. There is also the problem with the actual sword grip when dual-wielding swords. The problem there is the blades or "boken" you are using is not of the right spec to handle properly. There is very little counter weight on the back end to make the blade perform a proper cut, chop, slice, clip (which is a back cut), or thrust. And yes you use all of them when engaging in combat with large blades. Also the handles are to long when expressing the "breaking point" of the the slice. This means that when you just past to point of the most powerful leverage you have at the striking position (just after the supposed contact of the specified target i.e., hand, leg, torso head, etc... when going with the momentum of the strike. The wrist is used to assist bringing the blade around again along the same path for second and third strikes. (You can (do something twice but not three times is from "The book of Five rings"). For instance when chopping from left to right at an angle downward, the blade will end up at your right hip and than back up to the shoulder in a single motion. This is easier to perform with one hand. From the right shoulder you can strike from that side and hit is right side as apposed to his left, (because the attacker is facing you.) This technique can be used as a faint as well and can be used in series for chained multiple attacks. I have way more on double sword techniques but you probably think I am a bullshitter. But I promise you I do not mean any ill will towards any of your team and this is a message from on blade person to another. With all my heart I really hope I did not upset you or any of your viewers. I spent a lot of years training and I still have lots to learn and do not know everything. This is just based on my personal experience. Thank your for your channel.
Normally i love your videos. But this has that well known fault of "compliant victim v's bigger stronger teacher 🤔". I am certain this move "could work ?" But to allow your opponent to place his blade on your shoulder or across the body 😱, so close to your neck ! !. I really don't understand this unless for competition and is a suicide move just for no lose points ?
Can we stop using "Most Deadly/Lethal, Dangerous" too appease *hite westerners. Their own honestly won't let them say 'The most dangerous..Is a squint and a finger pull on a trigger... Studying a martial art is for the continuation of the art. My first lesson was too learn Buddhism/Shinto.. Both teachers were about the betterment of the person through purpose, Not the quickest way too break a bone or concuss someone...🙏
I love your channel so much. It's easy to notice in my humble opinion just how how much you're both enjoying the martial arts, sharing some of it with the world and having a good positive laugh while at it. I actually started watching your korean videos without understanding a word, but it's just a pleasure to watch. Thanks for going through the additional effort of re-uploading with English subtitles for us!
I never knew these fighting styles could be combined.. thanks for teaching us!
It has always been one system
It was originally one system.
Thanks for the English translation! I saw this on the hogucouple channel, and I was dying to know what was going on lol
I only learned of Daitoryu thanks to one of your previous videos, and now I'm really starting to like it and respect it. Also: Kim is a grappling natural! Wow! :D
In the west, Aikido and other techniques which do not physically manhandle/disable the opponent are often widely mocked for being unrealistic and ineffective. Here, however, with someone actually explaining why, who can show when it fails and when it succeeds, and showing the subtleties, I can believe that these techniques work, especially in the context of swordsmanship. Psychology, extreme subtle differences in positioning and balance, etc. They appear to be subtle techniques meant for people who've already mastered all the more basic techniques and want a leg up on their opponent next time they find themselves in such a scenario.
Edit: I have been informed that Aiki-jujitsu is not exactly Aikido, so not sure if anything I said really applies anymore! Sorry! Just as if not more important is probably the skill of the relevant practitioners and whether or not they've been taught in an effective way. It looks reasonable here, for example.
The biggest teaching of Aikido that also came from Aiki jujutsu is that you always have Atemi (striking) to make it work. There simply won't be any kuzushi if you are free fighting against a skilled opponent without Atemi. Unarmed scenario, hit them in the face to the point they cannot resist your techniques anymore, then use your Aikido throws. Sword scenario, without knowing how to cut, thrust, engage, create pressure from your sword blows, none of the techniques showed here will manifest
The difference between good Aikido vs good Aiki-Jujitsu is the same as good Judo vs good Jujitsu. Maybe there’s a difference in todays practice, but the creators of the systems had the same root.
I like this one alot! One of my favorites so far!
I love your videos. They are fun, always new stuff to learn and increase my knowledge
Best greetings from Germany :)
I feel like I need to experience this to fully understand what's going on. Still, I can see that control the neck/head, control the body would work.
Another good video thanks
Awesome
This will be fun to learn 👁️
Oh daito.
This first class was an old aiki jujitsu in 20 century.
Aikido was a modern art in second class.
Like family tree
Excelente video, gracias por traerlo.
I love this, thank you ❤
thanks love your channel
I think Japanese Police Kendo allows for throws? Probably a variety of good stuff in that.
Excellent techniques thanks for teaching them. What are the follow up moves once you have thrown your opponent?
That's so cool. It's a shame it's not used in movies.
When your subtitles said period did it mean point?
if you mean the "period" at 3:05, what it really means is that "the foot is just to make sure." a "finishing touch" if you will, as in it's not really necessary for it to work but just to make sure.
This is legal in police kendo, but not in regular kendo, am I right?
Police Kendo? I gotta look that up.
Indeed, you are right
From 5 minutes on, I could see a lot of Fiore dei Liberi similarities.
niiice
Sometime if possible can you try out Dacian Falx and sica. They were the bain of the Romans at one time and would love to see folks with your skill see how you would use them.
So, basically, instead of getting into a bind with the opponent's sword, you're using the same portion of the blade to bind against their neck. Interesting. 👍
Love your content, but can you please put the subtitles two lines up thanks. the youtube bar gets in the way sometimes. Thanks and keep it up.
Ive always suspected that aikido works better in tandem with a weapon🤔
It’s a shame that such techniques won’t get you the ippon in shiai. 😅
You are allowed to strike your opponent in the moment after they have fallen. However unless you are in a police taikai you will likely receive hansoku for any of these techniques.
🙂
where can I find the spear fighting video starting 0:16?
Now make a video with using this texhnique in a real sparing match for us to see in practice
🐺🖤🐧🐧🐧🏆
3:13 the subtitles just laught in Brazilian 💀
코등이 싸움 원래 저렇게 하는 거구나
well, when your enemy lost head, they will be knocked down >:)
what is akido??
Thought the intro VO was by the Korean Englishman.
Listen, you guys are pretty okay! I really mean just okay. Not trying to troll you guys at all so please do not take any offence to what I am trying to express.
Please read "The Book of 5 Rings". It is from your homeland but none of you display any of the techniques therein. You have to be able to wield a sword with one hand or both hands. Being varied in techniques with one or two hands on the handle the sword throughout different transitions of the fight is of great importance. Being able to handle your blade properly in both ways will allow you more balance on uneven ground, counter troughs and sweeps by being able to use the complementary (not Weak) hand to prevent losing the advantage in the sword grappling stages. Both hands on the sword causes a lock-up condition making it easier for the the attacker to take you down.
There is also the problem with the actual sword grip when dual-wielding swords. The problem there is the blades or "boken" you are using is not of the right spec to handle properly. There is very little counter weight on the back end to make the blade perform a proper cut, chop, slice, clip (which is a back cut), or thrust. And yes you use all of them when engaging in combat with large blades. Also the handles are to long when expressing the "breaking point" of the the slice.
This means that when you just past to point of the most powerful leverage you have at the striking position (just after the supposed contact of the specified target i.e., hand, leg, torso head, etc... when going with the momentum of the strike. The wrist is used to assist bringing the blade around again along the same path for second and third strikes. (You can (do something twice but not three times is from "The book of Five rings"). For instance when chopping from left to right at an angle downward, the blade will end up at your right hip and than back up to the shoulder in a single motion. This is easier to perform with one hand. From the right shoulder you can strike from that side and hit is right side as apposed to his left, (because the attacker is facing you.) This technique can be used as a faint as well and can be used in series for chained multiple attacks.
I have way more on double sword techniques but you probably think I am a bullshitter. But I promise you I do not mean any ill will towards any of your team and this is a message from on blade person to another. With all my heart I really hope I did not upset you or any of your viewers. I spent a lot of years training and I still have lots to learn and do not know everything. This is just based on my personal experience. Thank your for your channel.
Normally i love your videos. But this has that well known fault of "compliant victim v's bigger stronger teacher 🤔". I am certain this move "could work ?" But to allow your opponent to place his blade on your shoulder or across the body 😱, so close to your neck ! !.
I really don't understand this unless for competition and is a suicide move just for no lose points ?
I love watching to pure jujutsu!
The west kinda ruined the thing to be honest...
Can we stop using "Most Deadly/Lethal, Dangerous" too appease *hite westerners.
Their own honestly won't let them say 'The most
dangerous..Is a squint and a finger pull on a trigger...
Studying a martial art is for the continuation of the art.
My first lesson was too learn Buddhism/Shinto..
Both teachers were about the betterment of the person through purpose,
Not the quickest way too break a bone or concuss someone...🙏
Failed the vibe test nice try