Discharging a Capacitor (RC Circuits)

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 80

  • @rodericksibelius8472
    @rodericksibelius8472 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome explanation on the 'mathematics/calculus applied'. You are very patient and show all the details and review of the algebra and calculus substitutions of the physics involved. You are an AMAZING teacher.

  • @JMCoMASK
    @JMCoMASK 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for these videos. My ap physics class is taught really fast and I miss a lot of concepts but your videos help fill in the blanks.

  • @surftahiti
    @surftahiti 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Clear and to the point.

    • @joeykelliher924
      @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      basically i can show you my phd ye

  • @essevideri
    @essevideri 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    your videos are amazing! you should really consider making videos on additional topics like electromagnetic waves!! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!

  • @AhmedMujtabaAwan
    @AhmedMujtabaAwan 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    keep up the good work....

  • @yuriyu279
    @yuriyu279 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow look what I've found! It's amazing! Thx!!

    • @HamzaKhan-sl7wj
      @HamzaKhan-sl7wj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I suggest u to study physics from physics wallah(indian youtuber) he's simple the best .. the only problem is that u won't understand him since he speaks hindi

  • @RanieroSupremo
    @RanieroSupremo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you!!! It helped me a lot to understand this topic.

  • @siftesema5722
    @siftesema5722 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you it helped a lot

  • @gvcallen
    @gvcallen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    For anyone confused about 4:03 where he simply adds a negative sign in front of the derivative, here is an explanation.
    The issue relates to the fact that, before the sign is added, dq / dt refers to the current through the resistor (a positive quantity, due to the passive sign convention) and therefore dq refers to a differential charge inside the resistor. Without applying the negative sign, you would be "mixing" your charges (or q's) by referring to both the charge in the capacitor and the charge in the resistor in the same equation (i.e. at this point q and dq do NOT refer to the same charges).
    If you want the term dq / dt to refer to the current through the capacitor (which is a negative quantity when it is discharging due to the passive sign convention) then you need to apply a negative sign in front of it, since dq / dt for the capacitor itself is negative, and the negative's "cancel" each other out to yield the correct KVL equation.
    A clearer way to have done it might have been to refer to the charge in the capacitor as qc, and the charge in the resistor as qr. Then you would simply substitute dqr / dt = - dqc / dt.

    • @alexandredemasure
      @alexandredemasure 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, I had trouble with that. Not perfectly sure still why would the variation of charges be opposite between R and C.

    • @gvcallen
      @gvcallen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexandredemasure Whenever using variables in an equation, independent of the sign before the variable, its obvious to see that the variable itself can "intrinsically" hold a negative sign, e.g. if I say -x = 3, x turns out out to equal -3 i.e. the negative sign was *inside* x itself.
      In the case of dq / dt for the capacitor, the quantity of dq / qt itself can be negative or positive, representative of negative current or positive current. Due to the passive sign convention, we represent positive current as a positive charge flowing through a component from the positive terminal to the negative terminal, and negative current as a positive charge flowing from the negative terminal to the positive terminal.
      For a resistor, charge always flows from the positive terminal to the negative terminal. However, for components such as batteries, charge flows from negative to positive when power is being provided to the circuit. When the capacitor is charging, the positive charges in the picture flow upwards and towards the negative terminal, however when we refer to the charge flowing "in" the capacitor we say it flows straight through from negative to positive. This represents a negative current, and therefore the "intrinsic sign" of dq / dt for the capacitor is negative.
      For the resistor current "i" in that equation, we can simply substitute dq / dt in place of i, because dq / dt is positive, and this matches our assumed sign for i, which is sort of positive by definition in this case. However, dq / dt is 'intrinsically negative' for the resistor, because of how the passive sign convention works. Therefore, if we want the equation which involves dq / dt to refer to dq / qt of the capacitor, we add a negative sign, therefore negating the intrinsic negative sign, and from then on dq / dt no "refers" to the capacitor.
      Hope this helps

    • @alexandredemasure
      @alexandredemasure 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gvcallen Thanks a lot, very helpful

    • @snotboogie2246
      @snotboogie2246 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I came to see the comments looking for this. Thanks a lot !!

  • @aveevu
    @aveevu 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!

  • @aweleuwagwu8602
    @aweleuwagwu8602 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God bless you man

  • @kaantembelcizer
    @kaantembelcizer 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so much!

  • @xXxserenityxXx
    @xXxserenityxXx 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So you plugged Ohms law into derivatives to make the relationship seem more complex?

  • @mercedesmalone973
    @mercedesmalone973 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    beautiful

  • @aniruddhagandhewar1367
    @aniruddhagandhewar1367 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful, TY!

  • @merym4117
    @merym4117 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    You just saved my life thak you

    • @joeykelliher924
      @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      YOU ARE THEREFORE HIS PROPERTY TO DO WITH AS HE PLAESES

  • @sofiagodinho924
    @sofiagodinho924 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man you're a lifesaver, I had to do a project about this, I'm in 12th grade and 12th grade maths doesn't include integrals so my physics book didn't really explain that part? so it just jumped to the final formula and I was so confused. Great video, clear as day and really easy to understand.

    • @omop5922
      @omop5922 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      12 grade maths doesn't include integration?wth ?which country ?

    • @sofiagodinho924
      @sofiagodinho924 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@omop5922 it included derivatives but not integrals. Portugal

    • @HamzaKhan-sl7wj
      @HamzaKhan-sl7wj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sofiagodinho924 oh .. but they should include these portions as the calculus(derivatives and integrals) is the backbone of maths.. in india things are far more tougher in 12th grade...anyways good to know that u can speak English as I thought that latins only speak their native language😂😂.. I was wrong brother..

    • @sofiagodinho924
      @sofiagodinho924 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HamzaKhan-sl7wj Spanish people have a really hard time with english, in portugal most people have a really good grasp of the language and can speak it effortlessly, even though our accent is very heavy

    • @HamzaKhan-sl7wj
      @HamzaKhan-sl7wj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sofiagodinho924 what is the language there ?

  • @monkeypoohonyou
    @monkeypoohonyou 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    good stuff!

  • @yolasbrenson1597
    @yolasbrenson1597 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love you, great video

  • @imfrommanndame
    @imfrommanndame 8 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    That's not an acceptable way of writing a q.

  • @surendrakverma555
    @surendrakverma555 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent lecture 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @khandaa005
    @khandaa005 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you so much sir

  • @sadiaraisa3026
    @sadiaraisa3026 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you 😭

  • @nourabbas1564
    @nourabbas1564 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    what are the steps of discharging a capacitor?

    • @joeykelliher924
      @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      firstly you have to do the discharging/charging practical 15 million toimes roight

  • @Yousungally
    @Yousungally 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is there no battery? also, how do you find the voltage across resistance when it is discharging?

    • @tentanus3938
      @tentanus3938 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The capacitor is the "battery". You can store charge in the capacitor.

    • @snotboogie2246
      @snotboogie2246 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tentanus3938 capacitors do not store charge. They store energy ma gueule.

  • @firasghotmi9168
    @firasghotmi9168 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    in which grade do you guys take these?

    • @CodedGames
      @CodedGames 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Firas Ghotmi Second year of college.

    • @aaa_agg1657
      @aaa_agg1657 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Firas Ghotmi 11th

    • @konev13thebeast
      @konev13thebeast 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      highschool or freshmen year of college

    • @joeykelliher924
      @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      basically in year one class, although i was a 20 year old ye

    • @fr0iler578
      @fr0iler578 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's not exactly based on the grade per se but rather the ability of the person. This specific video is for AP Physics C, which is a University/College Level Class taught in High School. People who take this class usually do some in 11th or 12th, but this is actually for first year physics in College

  • @shylildude
    @shylildude 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    at 2:49 why is i negative?

    • @2752RUMI
      @2752RUMI 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Current = rate of change of charge.
      Since the capacitor is being depleted here, the rate of change of charge is a negative quantity.
      That's why the current is negative.

    • @Deuce1042
      @Deuce1042 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Basically because there's a voltage drop across that resistor. Which is characterized by an energy loss. Kirchoffs analysis is basically a neat application of conservation of energy and voltage is of course potential energy per unit charge.

    • @Deuce1042
      @Deuce1042 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you were just talking about at 2:49 which is him setting up his equation. But Islam is definitely right about the capacitor being depleted.

    • @briangonzalez6432
      @briangonzalez6432 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      shylildude Kirchoff Voltage Law

    • @joeykelliher924
      @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      because basically you have to ask yourself what is charge

  • @tasosdiamantis
    @tasosdiamantis 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    but why do you write Vc + Vr =0 , in normal kirchoff analysis wouldn't we write Vc - Vr=0?

    • @satyamrai2577
      @satyamrai2577 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      he's right,since dq/dt is negative,thats why it becomes Ri+v(t)=0 .its correct .

    • @joeykelliher924
      @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      basically ye

  • @lynsikeye3714
    @lynsikeye3714 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why can't my proff teach it like this? It'd make so much more sense.

  • @kidusbahiru4369
    @kidusbahiru4369 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    where is the battery?

  • @mynameisjeff5050
    @mynameisjeff5050 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    333

  • @yamahaviola
    @yamahaviola 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    your q looks like drunken 8 ! xD

    • @joeykelliher924
      @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      YOU ARE A GHASTLY CHILD I AM NOT COVERED IN MY OWN GREASE

  • @joeykelliher924
    @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    yeah
    basically yeah

  • @joeykelliher924
    @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    yeah its basically just a phd school

  • @kennethchristie5167
    @kennethchristie5167 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    voltage source missing. ooops

    • @calebmuscavage9442
      @calebmuscavage9442 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      +kenneth christie Not showing a voltage source indicates the capacitor is being discharged, and no charged. He's correct.

    • @joeykelliher924
      @joeykelliher924 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ye basically kenneth has done alot of work on potential ye

  • @ahmedalbalushi8022
    @ahmedalbalushi8022 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your pen sound is annoying