@@syedatif8806 he is a dangerous character, he was a trainer and he knows what to say and when to say, us ne jaan bhuj ke muharam mai yazeee ko secular bana diya. Gussa tab atta hai jab us ke followers us ki in chapri bataun ke neeche comment karte hain ( one man army)
@@waseemijaz4087Pakistan proposal do sakhs ke khilaf tha: russo and luther...luther was religious anarchist and russo was political anarchyst ....so jinnah Pakistan ke base rakha : iman , ittehad o tanjim...faith , patriotism and discipline ...matlab jinnah ko discipline ki taraf ana para anarchy se chut pane ki liye...
Qaiser sb ny hr ocasion pe video bnane hoti. cricket season ho tou cricket me kia secular hai kia ni hai es pe video bnaega. bech me muharam agaya tou us me secularism guser dia. Ab Arshad Nadeem ka gold medal agaya, Allah sy dua hai k qaiser sb apny next video me javelin ko he secular na declare krden.
Though I dont listen jokers like raja.but I was looking some info about treaty ,thanx Taimur stay blessed.and stay strong, you are doing superb work ,though its realy hard
Secularism, that seperates role of religion from Politics, has contradictions within itself. Secularism affirms religion, but confines religion to personal worship alone. Secularism affirms the Creator, but restricts the relationship to private affairs alone. It affirms accountability before the Creator, but obstructs public deeds necessary for it. Secularism affirms man is a limited and incapable creation, but still makes him a law-maker for other men, as a deity on earth. Although it acknowledges the temporary nature of this worldly life, but nurtures a firm attachment to the mortal, worldly life, almost as if it will not end. It is no surprise that the West faces a deep spiritual crisis, stumbling over the bounds of religion in public life. In Islam, both the private and public life is for the pleasure of Allah ﷻ. Allah ﷻ said وَمَا خَلَقْتُ الْجِنَّ وَالْإِنسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ “And We did not create humans and Jinn, but for worship.” [ TMQ Surah ad-Dhaariyat 51:56]
"Secularism affirms religion/creator/accountability", under the auspices of which secular ideology is this true? What do you mean by affirmation? Secularism does not argue for the truth or untruth of religion, it merely argues for a political and social relationship where religion is not the driving thought behind our social contracts, this is by no means an affirmation of religion or a negation of it. It merely aims to distance itself from imposing religious ideology on those who do not hold it to be true. This is by no means affirmation, this is a negation of all religious "truth" as arbitrary or at the very least arbitrary to the apparatus of the state. This entire argument is but a caricature of what the ideas of secular thought are.
Contrary to the myth Secularism is not anti-religion, it allows all religions to co-exist without one imposing itself over another. It also allows for debate and dissent without fear.
@@Shams0748h USSR was a communist state. There are differences between Communism and secularism. One disallows the practice of any faith. The other allows the practice of all faiths without fear.
Pagan (i prefer to call them folk religions since the word pagan is derogatory) state religions were interesting in a sense that they were generally very tolerant of other folk religions, in a way like “you may create and worship as many gods as you like, just don’t mess with ours”. Christianity and Islam were like “absolutely not!”.
@@noumansaghir6382almost every religious follower thinks like that, its just that adherents of some religions don’t go so far as to condemn others’ dieties of falsehood. Just think about it, followers of two major abrahamic religions that believe in a single God, killing not just ‘pagans’ but also the people of different sects from their own religious pedigree. Whereas on the other hand followers of thousands of gods are tolerant of each other. Which one sounds more cultured and refined? People are naturally always going to fight over territory, resources and mating partners, so why complicate the things further by tussling over whose God is right or wrong? A good natured God will simply reward you for praying in his honour and respecting His creation, rather than shedding blood and insulting the non followers under the pretext of His divine commands.
Secularism is the most appropriate political stance for any modern nation. The separation of religion from the state-whether it be the church or the mosque-is crucial to curbing extremism. However, I sometimes wonder if the people of this nation, who have long enjoyed the privileges and special treatment afforded by religious influence, will be astute enough to recognize and accept this change, even if it means relinquishing their favored status.
I live in USA. State is separate from religion or church. Its in USA constitution. Protestant and non protestant live happily in USA. Never had issues. But i sm sure in past both fought. Who stands with poor tell that to saudi arbia today. king faisal was different who stood with poor . Things changed in Muslim world unfortunately
Sir, it is not a question of whether Yazid or Abu-Jahl was secular or not? The question is what is the link of these characters with Punjab, Sindh, KPK or Baluchistan.....
Respected sir,,,Term secularism has been emerged in modern era but the thought was old since when the concept of State came into being..... And agr man liya jaey abu jahl nd yahzid secular ni thy blky religious thy,,,then can you justify their actions by religious parameters,,, specially by principles of Islamic political concept.....?
@@Taimur_Laal ask me anything about India and Hindusnism. Cow is holy in India because for thousands of years cow is life line of Indians it gave us milk cheese curd butter works in farming also as loader as bullock Cart it dung use as fuel as pesticides. But why dirtiest animal pig is holy papa in Islam why they can't eat and kill it?
@@Taimur_Laal you are a flase according to India agar hindustan me Hindutva nahi hoga tho kya 57 islamic desho me hoga? 😀 For 20% muslims we gave 30% land of India we don't want low lvl muslims in India they only care about breeding
Dear Taimoor Sb, whatever your secularism definition is, or your thoughts on system can be or whatever system you prefer, one thing is sure; Islam in its origin, principle and Quran is guiding principle rather Code for an Islamic state. Islamic state cannot be secular as per Quran and its teaching and Hazrat Muhammad SAW. Rest you can debate for 100 yrs you like it or not, prefer it or not.
People have been using secularism interchangeably with outright kufr, and as a curse word. 😂😂😂😂😂 If i hear such a question, i would get up and go home listening to 'ye dunya, ye mehfil meray kaam ki nahin' in the car! 😂😂😂
6:26 you totally wrong about Hindusnism. not a single king in India call themselves that they are Hindu king. Hindus have many Geetha for example Krishna Geetha or astavkar geetha or Shiv Geetha etc but not a muslim nor a Christins can't able to write new Quran
In my opinion power turns pretty much everyone oppressive to varying degrees, be it left wing or right wing. The only difference is that left wing acts cute when out of power but right wing is ever militant.
Mr Taimur, Conservatives define secularism as "not every sin is a crime and not every crime is a sin". They believe that secularism is the separation of religion and politics, sin and crime and believe that "sin is a crime and crime is a sin", therefore, they identify religion and politics. Secular and conservatives are opposites. this is the general notion that is accepted in Pakistan. Change in definitions wont change the opposition.
Last statement kind of affirms the reason why Punjab prior to independence was ruled by leftist- stand with people who are victimised -- lots of Sikhs consider this very aspect crucial aspect of their religion- stand with weaker party
The Umayyads always used the religion of Islam to strengthen their government, which is why Imam Hussain (peace be upon him) called this system of government corrupt.
Yazeed aur iska khandan secular nhi tha balkay ye laug islam ki apni interpretation implement krna chahtay thay aur isi ka nateeja he k islam me aaj inki taleemat ko follow krne wala firqa bhi mujood he.
Sir apny kaha ky secularism ek phenomena ha jo ky grow hi 17th or 18th c ma krta ha so middle ages ma kissi insan ka secular hona possible nhi but i think secularism is all about thoughts iska direct link aapky mindset sa hota ha, ek insan duniya k nizam ko kis tarah dekhta ha. To chahy wo 18th ma ho ya phr 7th century ma ho. But i agree that abu jahal and yazid were not secular .
The difference is that in islam there is no vote or bay'ah without consent as zubayr ra stated. So yazeed took votes of people in madina through death threats and bribery. However this is not islamic.
and abu jahl nd yahzid ny Islam ka koi new self crested version b present ni kiya,,,,, if they did present then there would be a sperate sect,,based on abu jahl and yazid's Islamic political doctrine.......
Professor sahab question ko samajh nehi paya...keu ke agar Hitler , Mussolini and Stalin secular and territorial ho sakta hai , they are not spiritual , so why not Abu jahl and yazid not spiritual and secular ho sakta???
@@Taimur_Laal Iqbal ne religion and politics ki separation ko bohat kharab bataya keu ke Hitler , lyoed george , and clemensu ko dekh kar secular and not spiritual fox wits se tamam Indian Sub continent kap utha...keu ke Iqbal jubani: shafaq nehi hai Magrib ke afaq par, ye joo e Khun hai ,yehi Joo e Khun hai !!!
@@wahmad8211 ab crusade nehi HOTA, ye scientific age, iron age...ab Nazism , communism , fascism is the main problem, Taliban is the by product of afgan communism, sirian isis is the by product of bashars fascism ...
@@wahmad8211 this the problem of not understanding Iqbal and German philosophy...the problem is not lions heart but foxs wit, not personality but technicality...
@@Taimur_LaalWhy you need secularism Arabi ZEHNI GHULAM? Quran Surah At Tawbah 9.5- Kill the polytheists after the month of RAMADAN Quran Surah At Tawbah 9.123- O believers, fight against disbelievers around you Quran Surah AL BAYYINAH 98.6 - Polytheists are Worst of creatures and will be in hellfire Arabi political ideology book Quran is full of hatred against disbelievers
Pakistan proposal do sakhs ke khilaf tha: russo and luther...luther was religious anarchist and russo was political anarchyst ....so jinnah Pakistan ke base rakha : iman , ittehad o tanjim...faith , patriotism and discipline ...matlab jinnah ko discipline ki taraf ana para anarchy se chut pane ki liye...
Thank you for information lakin sr is tarah to saaf samaj ata ha k prophet s.a.w ne islam as a religion introduce ni krwaya balkay islam to ak system ha jisay arabic mn deen urdu mn aaeen or english mn constitution kehtay hn. is say saaf zahir ha k har muslim ko islam ko as a religion ni blkay as a constitution dekhna chahya. sr chahay ap is ko banu umayah k point of view say accept kren ya banu abbas k but I believe every Muslim should believe in the constitution of Allah rather then any secular or communist ideology. Thank you
بہت اچھے طریقے سے اپنے وجاہت کیا کے مسلمان کیسےاپنے مذہب میں رہ کر مائنوریٹی کافرو اور ملحد لوگو کو اور ان کے حقوق کو کٹر لوگو سے کیوں اور کیسے بچائیں یہ بات نوجوان نسل کو کیسے سمجھائیں اپ نے بہت اچھے طریقے سے سمجھایا 🙏🙏🙏
پاکستان میں اصل میں جو مسئلہ ہے وہ مذہب کا نہیں ہے وہ انصاف کا ہے کیا مسلمان کیا کرسچن کیا ہندو کیا سکھ سب ہی پسے جا رہے ہیں اور ساتھ جی بھی رہے ہیں اور فائدے بھی اٹھا رہے ہیں- اپ بھی جب بات کریں انصاف کا دامن ہاتھ سے نہ جانے دیں
Masla ya hai kay religion apnay faida kay liya interpret kertay hain aur logon ko ghumra kertay hain aur in kay follower bhi damag say padel hotay hain jo choti choti bat ker sir ten say juda kerna vhuro ker daitay hain
محترم اپ دو مختلف نظریہ اور تصور کو ملا رہے ہیں جب خلافت وجود میں ائی تھی اس وقت سیکولرزم کا نام و نشان نہیں تھا تو ان دونوں کو ملا کر لوگوں کو misguide کرنے کو یا تو بیوقوفی کہا جا سکتا ہے یا پھر چالاکی تاکہ اپنے موقف کو علمی ظاہر کیا جا سکے-
وہ یہ بھی کہتے ہیں کفر ماڈرن سوسائٹی میں سیکولرازم سے بہت ملتا ہے جلتا نظام ہے مزہبی پہلو تو نہیں ہے مگر کفر کی ساری خصوصیات ماڈرن سیکولرازم سے ملتی ہیں
This revelation was made by Dutch philosopher Qaisar Raja😂😂😂
He is a stupid character
Really
Dutch 😂😂😂
@@syedatif8806 he is a dangerous character, he was a trainer and he knows what to say and when to say, us ne jaan bhuj ke muharam mai yazeee ko secular bana diya. Gussa tab atta hai jab us ke followers us ki in chapri bataun ke neeche comment karte hain ( one man army)
qaisar new chawal in pakistan
And Prof Taimur has the courtesy of not even mentioning his name, after mopping the floor with Qancer Rajahs tweet 😂
Now the charlatan Cancer raja will. Come with his comedy response😂
Yaar woh banda bohat dangerous hai, us ne phir baat gol kar deni hai
Chlo hasne ko moka miljaye ga use Dekh k😅😅
@@waseemijaz4087😂😂😂
@@waseemijaz4087Pakistan proposal do sakhs ke khilaf tha: russo and luther...luther was religious anarchist and russo was political anarchyst ....so jinnah
Pakistan ke base rakha : iman , ittehad o tanjim...faith , patriotism and discipline ...matlab jinnah ko discipline ki taraf ana para anarchy se chut pane ki liye...
@@Enlightenedpersona zarur ye kachra pak studies me padha hoga. Grow up man.
Thank you sir g for educating us, for Free.
As usual your explanation is concise, crisp and clear.
Jazakallah ❤
Arabi baddu hazrat Muhammad spread Arabi political ideology called Islam in Arabic and destroyed secularism
Qaisar sahb wrong ha Lekin to bhi secular ka baap ha
Qaiser sb ny hr ocasion pe video bnane hoti. cricket season ho tou cricket me kia secular hai kia ni hai es pe video bnaega. bech me muharam agaya tou us me secularism guser dia. Ab Arshad Nadeem ka gold medal agaya, Allah sy dua hai k qaiser sb apny next video me javelin ko he secular na declare krden.
Though I dont listen jokers like raja.but I was looking some info about treaty ,thanx Taimur stay blessed.and stay strong, you are doing superb work ,though its realy hard
بہت اہم نکتے پر نظر ڈالی ہے ❤
You are a gem ❤❤❤❤
He is a gum
Secularism, that seperates role of religion from Politics, has contradictions within itself. Secularism affirms religion, but confines religion to personal worship alone. Secularism affirms the Creator, but restricts the relationship to private affairs alone.
It affirms accountability before the Creator, but obstructs public deeds necessary for it. Secularism affirms man is a limited and incapable creation, but still makes him a law-maker for other men, as a deity on earth.
Although it acknowledges the temporary nature of this worldly life, but nurtures a firm attachment to the mortal, worldly life, almost as if it will not end.
It is no surprise that the West faces a deep spiritual crisis, stumbling over the bounds of religion in public life.
In Islam, both the private and public life is for the pleasure of Allah ﷻ.
Allah ﷻ said وَمَا خَلَقْتُ الْجِنَّ وَالْإِنسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ “And We did not create humans and Jinn, but for worship.” [ TMQ Surah ad-Dhaariyat 51:56]
💯
Agree
But secularism wins.
"Secularism affirms religion/creator/accountability", under the auspices of which secular ideology is this true? What do you mean by affirmation? Secularism does not argue for the truth or untruth of religion, it merely argues for a political and social relationship where religion is not the driving thought behind our social contracts, this is by no means an affirmation of religion or a negation of it. It merely aims to distance itself from imposing religious ideology on those who do not hold it to be true. This is by no means affirmation, this is a negation of all religious "truth" as arbitrary or at the very least arbitrary to the apparatus of the state.
This entire argument is but a caricature of what the ideas of secular thought are.
Brother Taimur, you are an exceptional teacher. Thank you.
Don't know how the guy was...but calling Yazid and Abu Jahl a Secular is something which deserves grand laughter ovation.
مسلمانوں کی تاریخی کو اسلامی تاریخ کہنا ہی غلط ہے
The term secular emerged in 1500 around but the related ideas or concept visibly reflected in Yazid's action and thoughts.
the best comment i see here only
Mufti Tariq Masood is crying in corner😅.... Its a good response to Tariq Masood who said a ruler is a ruler no matter whatever he is....
Thanks this video was great, easy Urdu to understand
Amazingly explained. 😊
Contrary to the myth Secularism is not anti-religion, it allows all religions to co-exist without one imposing itself over another. It also allows for debate and dissent without fear.
😂As coexisted in USSR where churches were destroyed
There is huge difference between theory and practice of this concept
@@Shams0748h USSR was a communist state. There are differences between Communism and secularism. One disallows the practice of any faith. The other allows the practice of all faiths without fear.
@Shams0748h Did the Chechnyan and Dagestani Muslims cease to exist under all of USSR? Are there no Muslims in the Communist China today?
Pagan (i prefer to call them folk religions since the word pagan is derogatory) state religions were interesting in a sense that they were generally very tolerant of other folk religions, in a way like “you may create and worship as many gods as you like, just don’t mess with ours”. Christianity and Islam were like “absolutely not!”.
That is the difference between a man made and a Devine religion.
Then why Abraha invaded Makkah?
@@learningtape to destroy Kabba and to make (perhaps) his own Version of kabba more prosperous.
A Secular and Worldly reason.
@@learningtape Abraha was a Christian
@@noumansaghir6382almost every religious follower thinks like that, its just that adherents of some religions don’t go so far as to condemn others’ dieties of falsehood.
Just think about it, followers of two major abrahamic religions that believe in a single God, killing not just ‘pagans’ but also the people of different sects from their own religious pedigree. Whereas on the other hand followers of thousands of gods are tolerant of each other. Which one sounds more cultured and refined? People are naturally always going to fight over territory, resources and mating partners, so why complicate the things further by tussling over whose God is right or wrong? A good natured God will simply reward you for praying in his honour and respecting His creation, rather than shedding blood and insulting the non followers under the pretext of His divine commands.
Secularism is the most appropriate political stance for any modern nation. The separation of religion from the state-whether it be the church or the mosque-is crucial to curbing extremism. However, I sometimes wonder if the people of this nation, who have long enjoyed the privileges and special treatment afforded by religious influence, will be astute enough to recognize and accept this change, even if it means relinquishing their favored status.
Very interesting debate
Nicely explain. Congratulations.
I live in USA. State is separate from religion or church. Its in USA constitution. Protestant and non protestant live happily in USA. Never had issues. But i sm sure in past both fought. Who stands with poor tell that to saudi arbia today. king faisal was different who stood with poor . Things changed in Muslim world unfortunately
This video is awesome ❤❤❤
Lovely
luv u hogya sir.
keep debunking cults like cancer raja
تھینکس سر زبردست تجزیہ
Only Islam is the true and right path
Such an amazing and informative video Dr sahab ❤
It was my favorite topic
At last some common sense in our country. Great analysis 👍
Yehi to Karbala ka message hai, zulm aur jabr ke khilafat aor mazlum ka defa.
It's really excellent way to explain sir
Sir, it is not a question of whether Yazid or Abu-Jahl was secular or not? The question is what is the link of these characters with Punjab, Sindh, KPK or Baluchistan.....
Respected sir,,,Term secularism has been emerged in modern era but the thought was old since when the concept of State came into being..... And agr man liya jaey abu jahl nd yahzid secular ni thy blky religious thy,,,then can you justify their actions by religious parameters,,, specially by principles of Islamic political concept.....?
This video is Slap for Dutch Philosopher Qancer Raja😂
Kal se is video ko search kr raha tha aik baar samne aayi thi phir wapas ghayib ho gayi thi . Delete kr di thi kia?
@@Ikramellis scheduled it for today.
@@Taimur_Laal ask me anything about India and Hindusnism. Cow is holy in India because for thousands of years cow is life line of Indians it gave us milk cheese curd butter works in farming also as loader as bullock Cart it dung use as fuel as pesticides. But why dirtiest animal pig is holy papa in Islam why they can't eat and kill it?
@@Taimur_Laal you are a flase according to India agar hindustan me Hindutva nahi hoga tho kya 57 islamic desho me hoga? 😀 For 20% muslims we gave 30% land of India we don't want low lvl muslims in India they only care about breeding
True face of Intellectual in Pakistan ❤❤
Sir you are wonderful 👏
Sir Please also make a video on Karbala and what can we learn from this.
Good explanation ❤
Dear Taimoor Sb, whatever your secularism definition is, or your thoughts on system can be or whatever system you prefer, one thing is sure;
Islam in its origin, principle and Quran is guiding principle rather Code for an Islamic state. Islamic state cannot be secular as per Quran and its teaching and Hazrat Muhammad SAW.
Rest you can debate for 100 yrs you like it or not, prefer it or not.
Best lecture 😊
Sir in views k according to islam me Seclurism ha hi nhi.. Bcz islam religion ko state se alag ni krta.. Ya to ab ja k concept aya ha?
People have been using secularism interchangeably with outright kufr, and as a curse word. 😂😂😂😂😂
If i hear such a question, i would get up and go home listening to 'ye dunya, ye mehfil meray kaam ki nahin' in the car! 😂😂😂
In Pakistan secular bohat achcha ho sakta magar England me o waste land and hollow man ko Janam deta hai
The Umayyads always accepted mashab-e-islam,but the laws and political system of islam "deen-e-islam".
6:26 you totally wrong about Hindusnism.
not a single king in India call themselves that they are Hindu king. Hindus have many Geetha for example Krishna Geetha or astavkar geetha or Shiv Geetha etc but not a muslim nor a Christins can't able to write new Quran
You have created new content for Mr raja now he will made a response video with his funny logicd😂
Secular state doesnt remain a secular, it inevitably becomes secularizing state ie remove religion primacy from public life.
6:26 Hindus never says themselves that they are hindu kingdoms. Hinduism is open religion not based on any book nor any rule
In my opinion power turns pretty much everyone oppressive to varying degrees, be it left wing or right wing. The only difference is that left wing acts cute when out of power but right wing is ever militant.
@@alialvi7119 simplistic.
@@Taimur_Laal just my humble and possibly flawed observation Sir, you are ofcourse far more knowledgeable in these topics.
No sorry, not "necessarily"!
@@Nimmi23456 naturally. They were trying to make a revolution
Very well said.
Secularism bhi ek deen hi hai
Taagoot anek hai usme ye bhi ek hai
@@ShahidHussain-mt9zw of course not.
Mr Taimur, Conservatives define secularism as "not every sin is a crime and not every crime is a sin". They believe that secularism is the separation of religion and politics, sin and crime and believe that "sin is a crime and crime is a sin", therefore, they identify religion and politics. Secular and conservatives are opposites. this is the general notion that is accepted in Pakistan. Change in definitions wont change the opposition.
Last statement kind of affirms the reason why Punjab prior to independence was ruled by leftist- stand with people who are victimised -- lots of Sikhs consider this very aspect crucial aspect of their religion- stand with weaker party
The Umayyads always used the religion of Islam to strengthen their government, which is why Imam Hussain (peace be upon him) called this system of government corrupt.
Yazeed aur iska khandan secular nhi tha balkay ye laug islam ki apni interpretation implement krna chahtay thay aur isi ka nateeja he k islam me aaj inki taleemat ko follow krne wala firqa bhi mujood he.
Which firqa
@@ghauriofficial2172 ahlesunnat wal jamat
Great sr
Can you please make a video on pervez sb
Keeping Religion aside how was Abu jahal Umar bin Abdeywadh as a human....?? and why was he called Abul Hikmat till his death in jangh e Badar ....
sir, Y this video was deleted! 🤔
Dutch philosopher Qaiser raja😂😂😂😂
Sir apny kaha ky secularism ek phenomena ha jo ky grow hi 17th or 18th c ma krta ha so middle ages ma kissi insan ka secular hona possible nhi
but i think secularism is all about thoughts iska direct link aapky mindset sa hota ha, ek insan duniya k nizam ko kis tarah dekhta ha. To chahy wo 18th ma ho ya phr 7th century ma ho.
But i agree that abu jahal and yazid were not secular .
The difference is that in islam there is no vote or bay'ah without consent as zubayr ra stated.
So yazeed took votes of people in madina through death threats and bribery.
However this is not islamic.
and abu jahl nd yahzid ny Islam ka koi new self crested version b present ni kiya,,,,, if they did present then there would be a sperate sect,,based on abu jahl and yazid's Islamic political doctrine.......
Seems that you have got a new camera... :)
@@ArifHussainBalti no. Just adjusted the settings a little better.
@@Taimur_Laal Did well then
کمال است❤
Raja kya jaane adrak ka swad
QAR has challenged u for debate many times...y don't u accept it n go through very academic debate...So that every body can c who is right.
come on people, how can yazid and Abu Jehl be seculars...They were hard liners, fanatics and staunch followers of their respective religions
Yazid was hard liner follower of the religion what ??? Are you drunk ? Like yazeed ?
Please correct your statement of 360 days in one lunar year. Thanks
There are 354 days in one lunar year. Some academics believe that the Ka'aba had one deity for each lunar day which the sources rounded off to 360.
Professor sahab question ko samajh nehi paya...keu ke agar
Hitler , Mussolini and Stalin secular and territorial ho sakta hai , they are not spiritual , so why not Abu jahl and yazid not spiritual and secular ho sakta???
@@Enlightenedpersona because Yazid and Abu-Jahl never proposed the separation of religion and politics. I explained all this on the video. No?
Secular Matlab is Dunia ki, not separation of powers@@Taimur_Laal
@@Taimur_Laal Iqbal ne religion and politics ki separation ko bohat kharab bataya keu ke Hitler , lyoed george , and clemensu ko dekh kar secular and not spiritual fox wits se tamam Indian
Sub continent kap utha...keu ke Iqbal jubani: shafaq nehi hai
Magrib ke afaq par, ye joo e Khun hai ,yehi Joo e Khun hai !!!
@@wahmad8211 ab crusade nehi HOTA, ye scientific age, iron age...ab Nazism , communism , fascism is the main problem, Taliban is the by product of afgan communism, sirian isis is the by product of bashars fascism ...
@@wahmad8211 this the problem of not understanding Iqbal and German philosophy...the problem is not lions heart but foxs wit, not personality but technicality...
Western secularism is based on Christian values. French revolution persecuted religion
They know it. They just don't admit
Don't go to west. What will happen to your Arabi political ideology called Islam
@@laulaksiddique6160 but British secularism did not. Don’t you know that?
Read about Florence,Italy. Renaissance Era
@@Taimur_LaalWhy you need secularism Arabi ZEHNI GHULAM?
Quran Surah At Tawbah 9.5- Kill the polytheists after the month of RAMADAN
Quran Surah At Tawbah 9.123- O believers, fight against disbelievers around you
Quran Surah AL BAYYINAH 98.6 - Polytheists are Worst of creatures and will be in hellfire
Arabi political ideology book Quran is full of hatred against disbelievers
Very very unique question
Mutazillah sereis ka kya rha
Pakistan proposal do sakhs ke khilaf tha: russo and luther...luther was religious anarchist and russo was political anarchyst ....so jinnah
Pakistan ke base rakha : iman , ittehad o tanjim...faith , patriotism and discipline ...matlab jinnah ko discipline ki taraf ana para anarchy se chut pane ki liye...
Thank you for information lakin sr is tarah to saaf samaj ata ha k prophet s.a.w ne islam as a religion introduce ni krwaya balkay islam to ak system ha jisay arabic mn deen urdu mn aaeen or english mn constitution kehtay hn. is say saaf zahir ha k har muslim ko islam ko as a religion ni blkay as a constitution dekhna chahya. sr chahay ap is ko banu umayah k point of view say accept kren ya banu abbas k but I believe every Muslim should believe in the constitution of Allah rather then any secular or communist ideology. Thank you
@@ammarali1993 systems and laws change. What is unchanging in Islam is Tauheed.
ایک کثیر المذہبی، کثیراللسانی، کثیرالثقافتی، کثیر القومی، خطے میں ریاست اور نظام کی بنیاد کیا ہو گی؟
Us waqt tu ye concept he nahi thay
Sir wesay poori duniya main left wingers khud bhee oppressed hain.......
All BS until state gives u Justice don't matter what religion it has
Taimur Rehman and people supporting this ideology live in an ideological bubble. Please look at the world and see how secularism works.
@@3333-c6l please Look at Pakistan and see how sectarianism works.
Agreed @@uzone8571
بہت اچھے طریقے سے اپنے وجاہت کیا کے مسلمان کیسےاپنے مذہب میں رہ کر مائنوریٹی کافرو اور ملحد لوگو کو اور ان کے حقوق کو کٹر لوگو سے کیوں اور کیسے بچائیں یہ بات نوجوان نسل کو کیسے سمجھائیں اپ نے بہت اچھے طریقے سے سمجھایا 🙏🙏🙏
Bravo sir great job👍👍👏👏
Hakim mazheb ka chola pahen hue the ...awaam secular... thi hakim koi bhi zaani ho sharabi ho usse farq nhi padta uske khilaf awaz nhi uthani hai
Love you 💕
Mung drta lewani hkaru
Kha rata pata da che sa de pa mazgho ke rawan di
Time pass ke ....Zaan popular ke
Nor de sa kaar nishta
Amal de zero de
😢Yazid was 100% a secular as he kept the nizaam to his version and left religion to the people. That is what secularism is
sir lagta ha ap question he nhi smajy baichary ka ... wo to kehna chah rha ho ga ky shyad yazid sab mazhab ko ly kr chalna chah ra ho
Alas, in Bangladesh "Banye Bazu" was and is a fat hand of the Fascist Shekh Hasina regime. Your conclusion failed here😅.
پاکستان میں اصل میں جو مسئلہ ہے وہ مذہب کا نہیں ہے وہ انصاف کا ہے کیا مسلمان کیا کرسچن کیا ہندو کیا سکھ سب ہی پسے جا رہے ہیں اور ساتھ جی بھی رہے ہیں اور فائدے بھی اٹھا رہے ہیں- اپ بھی جب بات کریں انصاف کا دامن ہاتھ سے نہ جانے دیں
Masla ya hai kay religion apnay faida kay liya interpret kertay hain aur logon ko ghumra kertay hain aur in kay follower bhi damag say padel hotay hain jo choti choti bat ker sir ten say juda kerna vhuro ker daitay hain
محترم اپ دو مختلف نظریہ اور تصور کو ملا رہے ہیں جب خلافت وجود میں ائی تھی اس وقت سیکولرزم کا نام و نشان نہیں تھا تو ان دونوں کو ملا کر لوگوں کو misguide کرنے کو یا تو بیوقوفی کہا جا سکتا ہے یا پھر چالاکی تاکہ اپنے موقف کو علمی ظاہر کیا جا سکے-
Religion is opium
Make a video on anti muslim riots in England
Who said that?
Cancer ahmed raja
Does islam allow secularism?
Here you are wrong, they were secular, and Yazid only tried to maintain law and order.
I’m afraid, I’ve just watched your first unnecessary video sir
Hinduism pe video banao
Putr why dont you debate then? Bhag tay kyun ho. TH-cam pay wohi baat kar saktay ho laikin debate mai nahi?
ویسے یہ سوال کس نے کیا تھا نام بھی بتا دیتے تو بہتر تھا
Excellent response and well explained ❤❤❤
Qaiser Raja & his blind followers are satisfied Dheet
وہ یہ بھی کہتے ہیں کفر ماڈرن سوسائٹی میں سیکولرازم سے بہت ملتا ہے جلتا نظام ہے مزہبی پہلو تو نہیں ہے مگر کفر کی ساری خصوصیات ماڈرن سیکولرازم سے ملتی ہیں
Why you reupload the video sir😮